[svn:fx-trunk] 16037: Per request of TLF, rewrote CSSTextLayoutFormat to extend TextLayoutFormat rather than implement ITextLayoutFormat .

Revision: 16037
Revision: 16037
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-11 11:55:08 -0700 (Tue, 11 May 2010)
Log Message:
Per request of TLF, rewrote CSSTextLayoutFormat to extend TextLayoutFormat rather than implement ITextLayoutFormat.  This will allow TLF to add new formats and continue to use Flex without requiring any immediate work on our part.
QE notes:
Doc notes: None
Bugs:
Reviewed By: Gordon
Tests run: checkintests
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/core/CSSTextLayoutFormat.as

Similar Messages

  • [svn:osmf:] 13514: Changed the the default flex SDK to the worksspaces' current, rather than a specific SDK.

    Revision: 13514
    Revision: 13514
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-01-14 17:52:04 -0800 (Thu, 14 Jan 2010)
    Log Message:
    Changed the the default flex SDK to the worksspaces' current, rather than a specific SDK.
    Modified Paths:
        osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/.actionScriptProperties

    There should be a 4.y branch on the opensource.adobe.com site.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10050: Per-Module Style Management: Create a style manager for each application/module.

    Revision: 10050
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-08 07:43:16 -0700 (Tue, 08 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    Per-Module Style Management: Create a style manager for each application/module.
    The singleton StyleManager is still the only style manager that is currently used.
    QE notes: None.
    Doc notes: None.
    Bugs:
    Reviewer: Alex
    Tests run: checkintests, Managers/StyleManager
    Is noteworthy for integration: no
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/SWFLoader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/FlexModuleFactory.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/IFlexModuleFactory.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/events/Request.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/managers/ISystemManager.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/modules/IModuleInfo.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/modules/ModuleLoader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/modules/ModuleManager.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/IStyleManager2.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/StyleManagerImpl.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/lang/StandardDefs.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/tools/PreLink.java

    Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them.  This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 15655: Merge rev 15646, TLF 1.1 Build 604, from 4.x to trunk .

    Revision: 15655
    Revision: 15655
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-04-22 05:57:19 -0700 (Thu, 22 Apr 2010)
    Log Message:
    Merge rev 15646, TLF 1.1 Build 604, from 4.x to trunk.
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/air-config.xml
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/flex-config.xml
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/libs/textLayout.swc
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/ReleaseNotes.txt
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/src/flashx/textLayout/BuildInfo.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/src/flashx/textLayout/elements/FlowLeafElem ent.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/src/flashx/textLayout/elements/SubParagraph GroupElement.as
    Added Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/rsls/textLayout_1.1.0.604.swf
    Removed Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/rsls/textLayout_1.1.0.603.swf
    Property Changed:
        flex/sdk/trunk/

    I had downloaded it for test, and requested for evaluation license...
    But I haven't got license, and also I am not able to find Flash Builder Plugins from HFCD site....
    I think those plugins are removed from site....
    Please help me, if anyone have those plugins...

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 9220: Change call to TLF's compose() to composeToPosition().

    Revision: 9220
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-08-11 07:52:34 -0700 (Tue, 11 Aug 2009)
    Log Message:
    Change call to TLF's compose() to composeToPosition().  They are suppose to be the same but they are behaving differently in edge cases.  Reported this to TLF and Rich filed bug 2401112.
    QE notes:
    Doc notes:
    Bugs: SDK-22473
    Reviewer: Gordon
    Tests run: checkintests, TextInput, TextArea
    Is noteworthy for integration: no
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22473
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/RichEditable TextEditManager.as

    Gordon, it looks like its been a while since you made this post.  Not sure how valid it is now...   I am particularly interested in the LigatureLevel.NONE value.  It seems that it is no longer supported.
    How do I turn of ligatures in the font rendering?
    My flex project involves trying to match the font rendering of Apache's Batik rendering of SVG and ligatures have been turned off in that codebase.  Is there any way (even roundabout) to turn ligatures off in flash?
    Thanks,
    Om

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 13304: When updating to TLF 584 forgot to add the new rsl and remove the old one.

    Revision: 13304
    Revision: 13304
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-01-06 07:59:22 -0800 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
    Log Message:
    When updating to TLF 584 forgot to add the new rsl and remove the old one.
    QE notes:
    Doc notes:
    Bugs:
    Reviewer:
    Tests run:
    Is noteworthy for integration:
    Added Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/rsls/textLayout_1.0.0.584.swf
    Removed Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/rsls/textLayout_1.0.0.571.swf

    iTunes needs QuickTime to work.
    I think you will be all set if you install QuickTime standalone, not regular
    http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
    Download the isntall file to your hard drive - don't install it over the internet.
    If you are running anything Norton, turn that completely off before installing.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 11058: Removed three vestigial TLF files from the trunk.

    Revision: 11058
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-10-21 13:39:51 -0700 (Wed, 21 Oct 2009)
    Log Message:
    Removed three vestigial TLF files from the trunk. They had been removed from TLF but I hadn't realized they were gone.
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes: SG, this should fix your ASDoc build problem
    Bugs: None
    Reviewer: None
    Tests run: ant checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Removed Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/FXGExporter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/FXGImporter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_edit/manifest.xml

    Camuzo, please go to the forum and just un-subscribe yourself.
    each of your emails is getting sent to everyone who does want to use this forum
    just sending messages is not going to do anything.
    GO to this url:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/opensource/flexsdk
    and simply tell your account not to be emailed.
    But, please kindly stop just sending us all your messages.

  • Payment Distribution to Artists by per user plays, rather than total plays

    Hello!
    I just had a thought about how payment is distributed to artists that I wanted to see if anyone might have some thoughts on. Spotify still does come under criticism on occasion for artist payment distribution - I've seen a couple of instances of people citing iTunes as providing more monetary compensation to artists since it is per download, rather than per play, among other things. This seems to be especially true for independent artists, and artists who are generally less well-known.
    I was wondering if Spotify has ever considered doing payment distributions using the
         sum[ (total artist streams per user) / (total streams per user) ] across all users
    ratio for payment calculation, rather than the currently used
         (total artist streams across Spotify) / (total streams across Spotify)
    approach, i.e. calculating the artists' play ratio by user, rather than in one giant pool. If you have considered this, I would love to hear why the current payment implementation was chosen rather than a per user method, such as the one listed above. But... 
    If a per user method has not been considered by Spotify previously, I think it would be nice - while I'm not an analyst myself, I imagine that it could lead to more revenue for independent artists, and maybe even less famous artists that are still beholden to rights owners for distribution of payment. I think it would do this because it could account for differences in number of plays per user - rather than users who tend to play more music over the course of a month contributing more all artists' payout, each user has an equal voice in how money gets distributed to artists.
    I understand that such a switch would be difficult, and possibly insurmountable in the instance of free users - so, I am positing this as an idea not for all users, but for Premium users only. With Premium, it is a feasible goal, since you have a finite number of plays, and a finite amount of money coming directly from that user, and do not have to worry about trying to calculate differences in advertisement impact for different users. Doing that ratio calculation would be relatively straightforward of a switch computationally (though quite a large change in the system nonetheless, of course). 
    I think this type of change would empower both users and artists to use Spotify more. Firstly, it would empower artists to allow Spotify to play their music because the metrics they would get per month would be more reflective of the size of their fan base, and how much importance that fan base puts on the artists' music than current metrics.
    Secondly, it would empower users more, which I think is especially important for users between 18-32 years of age. While I am not an expert on the subject, I often find that users in this age group (my age group) care a great deal about having control over where their money ends up, which in this case means knowing which rights holders and/or artists are getting the money they are spending. I know I do. Switching to this system, while still not addressing the injustices that are felt within the relationship between rights holders and artists by many, would still allow users to have more of a say in who gets their money than the current system. On top of that, it might be helpfult for Spotify itself - if using Premium is the only way for users to feel empowered by knowing how their money is distributed, it may encourage people in the free tier to upgrade to Premium in order to feel empowered.
    Just a thought. I'd love to hear what you and others have to say about this idea. 

    @Merik thanks for the warm welcome, and for the quick, informative response!
    I had the chance to take a look at that page you linked to before my original post, and saw that paragraph you quoted, as well as the bullet point about paid users having a higher "per stream" rate. I guess what I was more interested in (and perhaps this is not the right place to ask this question?) was if there was more of an in-depth "why" behind their decision (and thanks again for linking to it!) documented anywhere that I might be able to read more about. Maybe I was missing something on that page (and please let me know if so!), but the only "why" that I could find was a sentence in the paragraph you quote above:
    "We believe, however, that our service and the lives of artists will both be best if the World’s music fans enjoy more music than ever before in a legal, paid manner".
    While it's great to see their opinion, I was more curious about the line of reasoning behind that position is all. Because I do wonder whether empowering premium users to have more fine-grained control over how their money is allocated, such as by doing pay "per user", might lead to both more paid users and more revenue for independent and/or lesser-known artists - and if that's something that Spotify has researched already, I would love to hear more about the pros and cons behind such an approach!
    Thanks!

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 5844: rename classes (again!) per Ely's last recommendation to avoid XML Library issues

    A new discussion was started by Alex Harui in
    Commits --
    [svn:fx-trunk] 5844: rename classes (again!) per Ely's last recommendation to avoid XML Library issues
    Revision: 5844
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2009-04-01 17:59:34 -0700 (Wed, 01 Apr 2009)
    Log Message:
    rename classes (again!) per Ely's last recommendation to avoid XML Library issues
    QE Notes: Rename mustella tests again (please)
    Doc Notes: Update names of classes in documentation.
    tests: checkintests
    Modified Paths:
    April Fool!
    View/reply at
    Replies by email are OK.
    Use the unsubscribe form at
    to cancel your email subscription.

    In the default php.ini is set open_basedir which limits work with php only to few directories (and directories bellow them). There is set /srv/http, /home,/tmp and /usr/share/pear by default.
    To allow your vhost you should add /data/www or set empty value.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10505: Update to TLF Build 516.

    Revision: 10505
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-22 10:35:30 -0700 (Tue, 22 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    Update to TLF Build 516. See textLayout/ReleaseNotes.txt.
    Updated build file so the manifest for textLayout_edit is removed since TLF did it with their build file.
    QE notes:
    Doc notes:
    Bugs:
    Reviewer: Gordon asked me to do this
    Tests run: checkintests, TextInput, TextArea, RichText
    Is noteworthy for integration: yes
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/ReleaseNotes.txt
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/build.xml
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/BaseTextLayoutImporter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/HtmlExporter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/HtmlImporter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/TextConverter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_conversion/src/flashx/textLayout /conversion/TextLayoutImporter.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/manifest.xml
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/Build Info.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/compo se/BaseCompose.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/compo se/ComposeState.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/compo se/ParcelList.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/compo se/SimpleCompose.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/compo se/StandardFlowComposer.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/compo se/TextFlowLine.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/conta iner/ColumnState.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/conta iner/ContainerController.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/debug /Debugging.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/FlowElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/FlowGroupElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/FlowLeafElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/LinkElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/ParagraphElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/SpanElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/TCYElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/TextFlow.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/ITabStopFormat.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/ITextLayoutFormat.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/TabStopFormat.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/TabStopFormatInc.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/TextLayoutFormat.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/TextLayoutFormatInc.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/forma ts/TextLayoutFormatValueHolder.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_edit/src/flashx/textLayout/EditC lasses.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_edit/src/flashx/textLayout/edit/ SelectionManager.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_edit/src/flashx/textLayout/opera tions/DeleteTextOperation.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_edit/src/flashx/undo/UndoManager .as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/tlf.properties
    Removed Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/LinkActiveFormat.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/LinkHoverFormat.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_core/src/flashx/textLayout/eleme nts/LinkNormalFormat.as

  • [svn:bz-] 24024: recreating the branch from BlazeDS4. 6 branch in place of trunk, as per the discussion from stake holders and Rohit's recommendation.

    Revision: 24024
    Revision: 24024
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2012-07-31 03:05:09 -0700 (Tue, 31 Jul 2012)
    Log Message:
    recreating the branch from BlazeDS4.6 branch in place of trunk, as per the discussion from stake holders and Rohit's recommendation.
    Removed Paths:
        blazeds/branches/4.6_Apache/

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10065: Comment out code causing an RTE in SWFLoader.

    Revision: 10065
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-08 13:14:26 -0700 (Tue, 08 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    Comment out code causing an RTE in SWFLoader. Will fix as part of per-module styles feature development.
    QE notes: None.
    Doc notes: None.
    Bugs: SDK-23081
    Reviewer:
    Tests run: checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: no
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23081
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/SWFLoader.as

    Hello, first post here..
    I maintain a java based lobby for an opensource RTS
    engine called spring at http://taspring.clan-sy.com
    You can find my lobbys source code at:
    https://taspring.clan-sy.com/svn/spring/trunk/AFLobby/
    Of note being the unitsync.dll/so library used to
    handle mods and maps. Implementing this library in
    pure java is not an option.
    I've dealt with quite a few JNi errors dealing with
    the linux users but we got through them all and it
    all worked great.
    I released a windows installer, and most users can
    run it fine with no issues with JNI, but 2 users seem
    to have problems, despite correctly installing
    everything.Does the JNI code use perl?
    This error message shows several hits on Google for perl related stuff.

  • Aggregate tables have many partitions per request

    We are having some performance issues dealing with aggregate tables and
    Db partitions. We are on BW3.5 Sp15 and use Oracle DB 9.2.06. After
    some analysis, we can see that for many of our aggregates, there are
    sometimes as much as a hundred partitions in the aggregates fact table.
    If we look at infocube itself, there are only a few requests (for
    example, 10). However, we do often delete and reload requests
    frequently. We understood that there should only be one partition per
    request in the aggregate (infocube is NOT set up for partitioning by
    other than request).
    We suspect the high number of partitions is causing come performance
    issues. But we don;t understand why they are being created.
    I have even tried deleting the aggregate (all aggregate F tables and
    partitions were dropped) and reloading, and we still see many many more
    partitions than requests. (we also notice that many of the partitions
    have a very low record count - many less than 10 records in partition).
    We'd like to understand what is causing this. Could line item
    dimensions or high cardinality play a role?
    On a related topic-
    We also have seen an awful lot of empty partitions in both the infocube
    fast table and the aggregate fact table. I understand this is probably
    caused by the frequent deletion and reload of requests, but I am
    surprised that the system does not do a better job of cleaning up these
    empty partitions automatically. (We are aware of program
    SAP_DROP_EMPTY_FPARTITIONS).
    I am including some files which show these issues via screen shots and
    partition displays to help illustrate the issue.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Brad Daniels
    302-275-1980
    215-592-2219

    Ideally the aggregates should get compressed by themselves - there could be some change runs that have affected the compression.
    Check the following :
    1. See if compressing the cube and rolling up the aggregates will merge the partitions.
    2. What is the delta mode for the aggregates ( are you loading deltas for aggregates or full loads ) ?
    3. Aggregates are partitioned according to the infocube and since you are partitioning according to the requests - the same is being done on the aggregates.
    Select another partitioning characteristic if possible. - because it is ideally recommended that request should not be used for partitioning.
    Arun
    Assign points if it helps..

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 9895: Rewrote TLFTextField.

    Revision: 9895
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-01 18:02:10 -0700 (Tue, 01 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    Rewrote TLFTextField.
    It previously used a TLF StringTextLineFactory to implement the 'text' property; it now uses FTE directly, similar to SimpleText.
    In addition, it now uses TLF's HTML importer and exporter to implement the 'htmlText' property. (Until TLF changes its HTML support to be more like the quirky HTML in TextField, getting 'htmlText' won't necessarily give you what you expect.) It renders the TextFlow produced from the htmlText by using TLF's TextContainerManager, rather than a TextFlowTextLineFactory, in order to support clickable hyperlinks and URL-loaded images.
    TLFTextField does not, and will not, support scrolling, selection, editing, or setting a text format on a range with setTextFormat(). It is intended for use only in those Halo components that don't require this functionality.
    A number of methods not called by the Halo components for which TLFTextField is intended have also been left unimplemented.
    Since we are planning to move TLFTextField from TLF to Flex, I haven't bothered to put this code into the TLF depot. If we integrate another TLF before TLFTextField gets removed from TLF, please don't clobber this version with the older version.
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: None
    Reviewer: Ryan
    Tests run: ant checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/SparkClasses.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/textLayout/textLayout_textField/src/flashx/textLayout/ controls/TLFTextField.as

  • Envy133lover101: Per request, here's pics of my Voodoo Envy 133:

    Original thread: http://h20435.www2.hp.com/t5/Notebooks/Photo-Album/td-p/56886
    Per request, here's pics of my Voodoo Envy 133:
    http://myenvy133.shutterfly.com/pictures/8

    Hello PatrizioVenezia,
    Welcome to the HP Forums.
    I just sent you a private message. If you are not sure how to check your forum messages, this post has instructions.
    Thanks for your time.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" at the bottom of this post to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    W a t e r b o y 71
    I work on behalf of HP

Maybe you are looking for