Symbol gone for adding contacts

my + symbol is gone for adding contacts. i restored my phone and it's still not back... any suggestions?

install the Desktop Manager. you can download it from the software section of the Blackberry.com website.
take the one "without Media manager" and install it on your PC.
then after openingthe Desktop Manager :
first, do a backup of what's in your Blackberry Storm
then you can do a manual synchronization, just choose ascii file and follow the instructions.
The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

Similar Messages

Cisco Jabber 10.5 call pickup feature - just for added contacts?

Hi everyone,
we are checking out the new Cisco Jabber for Windows client. The call pickup feature is the best new feature so far.
The only issue we are running into: as we are using global pickup groups devided by office we now see every call coming in for everyone.
I would suggest that it would be much better if you could choose, for which group of contacts you would like to enable the call pickup.
Is there a roadmap for this in the future of Jabber call pickup feature? Would be a very appreciated Addon.
Thanks & Cheers!

Roadmap questions cannot be discussed here, either post this question on a partner forum, or reach your AM for this.

What happened to for adding contacts manually in io5 iphones

In both of my Iphones after loading io5, I am missing the + sign to add contacts manually. Has anyone else seen this. Fix ??

The menus that were part of the older version of DW using javascript have been deprecated. In addition, the CS6 Spry feature has also been deprecated. As a result you are left with a few options.
Option 1 - Get an addon from the exchange (Adobe Add-ons ) or from third party sources like PVII ( Projectseven.com - Products ).
Option 2 - Consider a framework or CMS that comes with a drop down menu code or UI admin option to maintain the menu.
Given that you still have a menu on your website, for the time being, you should be able to edit the code to maintain the menu, but moving forward I would definitely seek out an alternative solution.

TS3274 When I open the contacts app I don't have the add sign in the bottom of the screen that is necessary for adding contact info. Please help!

My iPad is about one week old and I am just beginning to use it. I am trying to put my contacts in the contact app but can't seem to find the add sign at the bottom of the page to get started. Any ideas on what I am doing wrong? Thanks for all help!p

The add sign may be at the top or the bottom (plus sign).
But note this from the iPad User Manual:
Add a contact: Tap . You can’t add contacts to a directory you’re only viewing, such as a Microsoft Exchange Global Address List.

Uploading CSV file for adding contacts

Is it possible to upload a csv file of my contacts to the contact on my storm? If so, how is that done?

install the Desktop Manager. you can download it from the software section of the Blackberry.com website.
take the one "without Media manager" and install it on your PC.
then after openingthe Desktop Manager :
first, do a backup of what's in your Blackberry Storm
then you can do a manual synchronization, just choose ascii file and follow the instructions.
The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

How can i get newly added contacts for a Mailbox User in Exchange Server 2013

Hi all,
I need to synchronize contacts in Exchange Server and Sugar CRM Application, for that
i need to get newly added contacts for a User in Exchange Server 2013 by using EWS Managed API.
I know how get the list of all contacts for a particular user , but in the list how i can find
new contacts ?

Hi Dora,
that's the fun thing:
You add your own property (and it'll be invisible to outlook users, not to worry).
Extended Properties allow you to define custom property on Exchange Items. And it has a
method for setting those too.
Here's a short post doing a very simple intro on using Extended Properties.
Glen's Exchange Blog is a generally useful resource when working with EWS, I'm confident you'll be able to find lots of tips there as well.
Cheers,
Fred
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

I just downloaded Itunes on my phone and it needed to update a os1. I have new icons now but it erased all my contacts. Is that normal? Are all my contacts gone for good?

I just bought a square and in order to use it I needed to download Itunes with OS1. I did it but now I have no contacts, is that normal? Are all my contacts gone for good?

There is no iTunes download for any iOS device.

Updated to the 7 version. Under contacts there is no option for adding Notes. How do you get it back?

I updated to the 7 version. When you add a contact now, you no longer have the option for adding notes. Also all the apps I purchased are no longer on my desktop. The apps are shown under settings but I do not see where you can add them to the desktop.

I see notes under "add instant message" when you are setting up a new contact. Notes appears between "add instant message" and "add field" . Perhaps you didn't scroll down far enough. This is on my iPhone 4 so I don't know about other phones.

Is there a Short cut Key for adding or removing contacts to or from Groups in Address Book

I'm just curious if there happens to be a Short-cut for either adding contacts to a Group and/or removing them from Groups as well? Seems extremely inefficient to not have this options available. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

You can look at these extensions:
*Show Parent Folder: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/7372
*Go Parent Folder: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/7377

To the Adobe MUSE team....Have you considered adding an "Upload File" field for the contact forms?

To the Adobe MUSE team....Have you considered adding an "Upload File" field for the contact forms?

But seriously...
Is there any development being done for this? I have a careers section on our website that I have been asked to "make easier for applicants" (right now, there is a link that just opens an email). I'm going to make a full version of an application, but I would really like a way to upload resumes and CV's.
I'm going to have to look into some kind of service if this isnt something on the Muse radar. A reply of some kind would be fantastic!

I downloaded Macfee security and parental control. The settings have gone back to basic settings but if I try to customise the toolbar by add the "home" icon or adding "contact" to bookmarks until I close and when I open they are gone. Any ideas

I downloaded Macfee security and parental control. The settings have gone back to basic settings but if I try to customise the toolbar by add the "home" icon or adding "contact" to bookmarks until I close and when I open they are gone. Any ideas

Make that four.
If you have any commercially advertised/available antivirus software installed on your Mac, completely uninstall this per the instructions on the AV developer's website.
Antivirus software can slow down the normal operation of OS X and can negatively affect OS X performance and operation.
Do you have apps like MacKeeper or any other maintenance apps like CleanMyMac 1 or 2, TuneUpMyMac or anything like these apps, installed on your Mac? These types of apps, while they appear to be helpful, can do too good a job of data "cleanup" causing the potential to do serious data corruption or data deletion and render a perfectly running OS completely dead and useless leaving you with a frozen, non-functional Mac.
Plus, these type of apps aren't really necessary. They really aren't.
There are manual methods to clear off unnecessary data off of your Mac that are safer and you have complete control over your Mac and not just leave a piece of auto cleaning software in charge of clearing off data off of your Mac.
Their potential of causing OS X issues outweighs the implied good and benefits these types of hard drive or memory "cleaning" apps are written to do.
Plus, the software companies that write these apps make it hard to easily uninstall these apps if something DOES go wrong and these apps work in a way where you have no recovery or revert function to return your Mac back to its former, working state in the event something does go wrong.
It is best to never, EVER download and install these types of apps.
The risk to your system and data is too great a risk!
Search the web to learn how to correctly and properly uninstall these kinds of apps.
They all uninstall differently.

Adding multiple email address for same contact to mail group

Is it possible (in Apple Mail) to add a second email (work) address for a contact to an email group, how?

Sorry, but Address Book does not allow you to select more than one email address to send to in a group. There's really no reason why people need multiple copies of a message, anyway; they have the option of forwarding email to another email address of theirs.
Mulder

How do I change the default folder for saving contacts?

I have happily used Outlook for several years for POP accounts. My recent addition of an Exchange account has hijacked several default behaviors that I was used to. For one, contacts are now saved by default in the exchange related contact
folder instead of the folder that is associated with my primary POP account. How do I reconfigure Outlook to saved contacts to my preferred folder, so that I don't have to constantly move the new contacts after they are saved? I do not want this
information on the exchange account. This bad behaviour occurs no matter what email account is read, from which I am saving the contact info.
To reproduce the problem: Open a message in the POP email, right click on the FROM email address, choose Add to Contacts from the menu, find the contact stored in the exchange contact folder instead of the contact folder for the POP account (the folder
that Outlook USED to save to prior to adding the exchange account).
Work around: (annoying the first few times, mentally unhealthy after more than a few) Save the contact, then manually move it to the correct folder.

Hi,
What version of Outlook are you using?
I have test this in Outlook 2010/ Windows 7.
If set POP as default outlook data file(.pst),
Open a message in the POP email, and right click "Add to Contact" in FROM with External email address, it will save to POP contact folder.
If the Email address end with @Exchange.com, it always save to Exchange contact folder, no matter what is default email account, maybe this behavior by default.
Hope this helps.
William Zhou
TechNet Community Support

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Process for adding a boolean option to the web service API

Hey guys,
Here's a little background:
I'm currently working on adding an optional "strict" mode to some of the unmarshalling functions in SchemaMarshaller that will throw exceptions when receiving bad data for certain fields, and also improving the date handling while I'm at it (I want null instead of mangled dates when receiving bad data when strict mode is off).
This is for my benefit at the moment as I'm tired of spending time debugging Flex code when XFire and Oracle are spitting out rubbish (like empty xsd:DateTime nodes, DateTimes in xsd:Date nodes, etc) - but I'm sure other people would like to use it too while we don't have a response validator, so I'd like to do it in a way that I can submit as a feature request (with patch) on Jira.
My questions are about the procedure for stuff like this- where should this option be made public in the API, and who would I talk to about it? Or would it be best for it to always be strict? - That's how I'd like it :) Perhaps it should just log errors when it encounters bad data?
This is the first thing I'd like to "add" to the SDK rather than a simple bug-fix, so I just want to do things in a kosher manner. Sorry if I come across like a total noob :)
Cheers,
-Josh
"Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee."
:: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
:: 0437 221 380 ::
[email protected]

Hey Josh, I'm swamped at the moment but appreciate your interest and your contributions to Flex and WebServices thus far. I'll try and get some time to look into your specific request and what you're hoping to do at the code level, but to answer your question about test cases, you should consider the NIST testsuite for XML Schema datatypes. BlazeDS has historically maintained the WebService implementation, so it appears their test case for NIST based schema tests starts out here (and refers to many data type test cases in the /nist subdirectory). http://opensource.adobe.com/svn/opensource/blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/app s/qa-regress/testsuites/flexunit/src/tests/flexunit/xml/NISTXMLSchemaTes t.as Pete ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 8:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Process for adding a boolean option to the web service API A new message was posted by Josh McDonald in Developers -- Process for adding a boolean option to the web service API Yeah I knew it'd have to be somewhere outside of SchemaMarshaller, as it's [ExcludeClass] anyway so end users don't see it, nor is it documented in the api docs. Just wasn't sure where it should be. I'll have a think about it some more when I get some down time to work on it, but webservice was where I was thinking it should be too. Didn't think about having it settable on operation as well though, so thanks for that :) Anybody know a good source of valid values for various XSI types (date and DateTime mainly) for testing purposes? Or even who I should contact to get access to that sort of thing? I assume the W3C will take 6 months to answer me, and the answer will be "buy our $10,000 compliance testing suite" or something along those lines. -Josh On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Matt Chotin <[email protected]> wrote: A new message was posted by Matt Chotin in Developers -- Process for adding a boolean option to the web service API I think for a top-level user option I would put the new option on the mx.rpc.soap.Operation class (I think that's the name). You'd then have that propagate through to the underlying schema classes as they are used. I'd then also add an option to the WebService class itself, and basically in the Operation it should see if it has its own value set and if not check the value on the WebService. We do this for a couple of other flags too I think. End users in general wouldn't look at any classes other than the WebService and maybe the Operation classes, so asking them to set options on the schema classes themselves probably wouldn't work. Matt -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [email protected] ________________________________ View/reply at Process for adding a boolean option to the web service API <a href=http://www.adobeforums.com/webx?13@@.59b5be89/1> Replies by email are OK. Use the unsubscribe <a href=http://www.adobeforums.com/webx?280@@.59b5be89!folder=.3c060fa3> form to cancel your email subscription.

Symbol gone for adding contacts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for