Syntax check of code

I am passing certain code in table itab and then doing a syntax check using SYNTAX-CHECK FOR itab MESSAGE mess LINE lin WORD wrd .The problem with this method is it check the code line by line and assign mess with the first error msg but I want to trap all the error message of the code in itab at once in another table.
Is it possible to trap all the error msg at once in a internal table.

Hi,
This is similar to what ABAP Editor sytax check does. You cannot check sytax of the "futher" code as the "closer" code may affect the "further". Unless you correct the first error you cannot therefore check if futher lines are correct. If this worked like you want it would have to correct "closer" errors first by itself, then it could check rest of the code. But how the compilator (generall meaning) would have to know what to place there. This is of course impossible. There is no such compliator doing so in none of known to me programming languages.
You may skip this by a trick. Looping at the table with a code and checking each line of this with a check syntax. Then collect all these errors within an error table.
Nevetherless be carefull !! You would have to place excatly one statement per line in code table. Otherwise it won't pass the exam. Moreover you cannot use any of chain statements i.e.
write: 'first line',
'second line'.
...should be replaced with
write 'first line'.
write 'second line'.
Hope this give you some idea:)
Regards
Marcin

Similar Messages

Error Message code 1900 in syntax check and code LV_ERR in user interface

In my webdynpro component when i did the code inspector check i have an error message in syntax check
which says "Message code 1900: ObjectType WDYN Object name ZXXXX Row 1 Column 0 the size of the PXA buffer reached a critical value at 158 percent. The maximum size is currently 4,194,304 bytes ==> The size of the PXA buffer reached a critical value at 158 percent. The maximum size is currently 4,194,304 bytes.
Another Error message in user interface
which says: "Message Code LV_ERR:ObjectType WDYN Object name ZXXXX Sub-Object Type Sub-Object Name Error Load unit of component is very large (generation limit).==> Error Load unit of component is very large (generation limit) .
Please help in resolving these issues.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
you need to discuss with the basis team to increase the abap buffersize.
there is a parameter in the transaction rz11.
go to RZ11 and then wirte parameter as abap/buffersize
check its value.
if you increase it, problem will be solved i guess.
thanks
sarbjeet

Error in Syntax check in code

Hi,
We are developing a report, where we have written the following piece of code:
LOOP AT lt_kondd2.
      DO.
       If lv_first = "X".                                            "1
          READ TABLE lt_kotd2 WITH KEY knumh = lt_kondd2-knumh.
       Else.                                                         "1
          READ TABLE lt_kotd2 WITH KEY knumh = lv_smatn.
       Endif.
      Some Statements.
     Enddo.
    Some statements
Endloop.
During syntax check the above code is giving the following error:
Field "READ" is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement.
Please help point out what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Peter

>
Peter Grosvenor wrote:
>
If lv_first = "X".                                            "1
You are using double quotes (") rather than single quotes (').
Next time, do more desk checking before posting here.
Rob

Extended Syntax Check in abap code

Hi Guys,
We are upgrading from 4.6 C to ECC 6.0. When I do the Extended Syntax check for the custom function module it gives me the following error. Please help.
The EXCEPTION "REPORT_NOT_EXISTENT" is not defined in the interface of the function module "RS_VARIANT_CONTENTS" "RS_VARIANT_CONTENTS". Internal Message Code: MESSAGE G-7.
(The message can be hidden with "#EC ARGCHECKED)
Regards,
Shankar

<b>Don't suppress the message. </b> You should only suppress messages if you are aware of why they are appearing, and they are not an error.
What it means is, that in your custom function module, there is some code like
CALL FUNCTION 'RS_VARIANT_CONTENTS'
EXPORTING
    report                     = v_report
    variant                    = v_variant
EXCEPTIONS
   VARIANT_NON_EXISTENT        = 1
   VARIANT_OBSOLETE            = 2
   REPORT_NOT_EXISTENT         = 3
   OTHERS                      = 4
But if you look at FM rs_variant_contents, you'll see this exception is not defined. The correct course of action is to remove it from your call.
matt

Transport Organizer Syntax Check using the Code Inspector

dear fellows,
i'm facing a problem when i check the syntax of transport. When i'm using the option to check the syntax within the transaction se01 the system starts no longer the extended check but the code inspector.
is there any possibility to turn this code inspector check off and to get the extended syntax check again?
or on the othe hand, which variant is used for the check and is there any possibility to change the variant that is used?
thanks for your answers,
Robert

Nope... this is SAP standard code so I will reply to the OSS and wait for them to come back to you.
Regards
Juan

Syntax check error in the standard include

Hi,
I have modified one standard include using access key to insert one logic as per businness requirements.Now after inserting that code iam getting syntax error but while activating it is not showing the error and getting activated.
The include is V05XZZMO in that i have inserted code is as follows
FORM MOVE_USERFIELDS USING ZP.
CASE ZP.
    WHEN 'VBRK'.
    header
    MOVE LVBRK-XXXXX TO LFAMTV-ZZXXXXX.
*{   INSERT         GDVK934083                                        1
          MOVE LVBRK-ZUONR TO LFAMTV-ZZZUONR.
*}   INSERT
    WHEN 'VBRP'.
    item
    MOVE LVBRP-XXXXX TO LFAMTV-ZZXXXXX.
*{   INSERT         GDVK934083                                        2
   MOVE LVBRP-MATWA TO LFAMTV-ZZMATWA.
*}   INSERT
ENDCASE.
ENDFORM.
now it is throwing error saying that LFAMTV doesn't exist...when I double click on that it is taking me to the FM RV_INVOICE_VIEW_2 where it is defined....
Can anyone know the reason why it is throwing the error when we go for the syntax check but when u activate the program it is getting activated.. so can this error can be neglected?
Any help on this will be appreciated..
Regards,
Rohan.

Hi,
First comment ur code and then activate the include.
Now put a break point in the form and then in the debug mode check the structre LFAMTV is visible or not.
if yes then once again add ur code and then activate the whole program.
and now once again debug it and see...., whether the values are updated to the strurure LFAMTV.
Regards,
Nagaraj

SQL Developer 1.1.0.21: Issues with Data Grid and SQL syntax checking

In this new release of SQL Dev, when I execute a SQL in the SQL Worksheet and click in the Data Grid in the Results tab and try to navigate within a record using arrow keys, the grid cell enters into edit mode by default and so I cannot use the Left or Right arrow keys to navigate the grid. I am forced to use tab key to navigate. This is counter intuitive in my opinion.
Is there any option to change this behavior?
Another issue that I have come across is with SQL syntax checking. In some cases, when I press F9 to execute a SQL, it shows the SQL as executed i.e. shows something like 0.0134 seconds in the toolbar and no results displayed. In reality, the SQL had some syntax error which were NOT reported. This can be frustrating since now I have to fall back to SQL*Plus or TOAD just for syntax check.
I like the fact that SQLDev highlights the current SQL but it would be more useful if it just indicated the first line of the current sql instead of highlighting the whole sql.
Manish

"In this new release of SQL Dev, when I execute a SQL in the SQL Worksheet and click in the Data Grid in the Results tab and try to navigate within a record using arrow keys, the grid cell enters into edit mode by default and so I cannot use the Left or Right arrow keys to navigate the grid. I am forced to use tab key to navigate. This is counter intuitive in my opinion."
In the "Results" tab, Click Ctrl & Tab keys (at the same time) or with mouse click on any cell other than the first column (a sequence or rownum), you will be able to navigate using the arrow keys.
"Another issue that I have come across is with SQL syntax checking. In some cases, when I press F9 to execute a SQL, it shows the SQL as executed i.e. shows something like 0.0134 seconds in the toolbar and no results displayed. In reality, the SQL had some syntax error which were NOT reported. This can be frustrating since now I have to fall back to SQL*Plus or TOAD just for syntax check."
The 0.0134 seconds could be the result of the most recently executed successful statement. Check the Script Output tab for errors. Use F5 (Run Script option) instead of F9.
"I like the fact that SQLDev highlights the current SQL but it would be more useful if it just indicated the first line of the current sql instead of highlighting the whole sql."
On the SQL statement (or code), Right Click -> Format SQL (or press Ctrl & B), proper formatting would help.
I use version 1.0.0.15.57 and seems to be working allright.
- Babu Rangasamy

Error in Extended syntax check- Select Query

Hi all,
Iam getting this following error in Extended syntax check
" Large table PA0002: No field of a table index in WHERE
condition"
Code :SELECT SINGLE PERNR INTO (G_PERNR) FROM PA0002 WHERE ZZLEGACY_PAYROLL = I_FILETAB-PRNO
AND ZZLEGACY_PAYSYS = I_FILETAB-PRSYS
AND ZZLEGACY_PAYINS = I_FILETAB-PRINS.
can anyone help on this?

Hi,
Change the code like this and check............
For this u need put INSIDE LOOP.
Select single PERNR into G_PERNR from PA0002 where PERNR = I_FILETAB-PRNO and .......... and ......
Check like this...
Thanks.
If this helps you reward with points.
Message was edited by: KDeepak
Message was edited by: KDeepak

Extended program check and code inspector

Hi Gurus,
I developed on report . I wrote at end of and at new in loop but extended code checking it showing one error is:
1)The LOOP statement processing will be limited
(FROM, TO and WHERE additions in LOOP)
Interaction with group change processing (AT NEW, ...) is undefined
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
2)The LOOP statement processing will be limited
(FROM, TO and WHERE additions in LOOP)
Interaction with group change processing (AT NEW, ...) is
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
and I wrote select statement for input validation extended check showing warning as:
Syntax check warning
This warning is only displayed in SLIN
In "SELECT SINGLE ...", the WHERE condition for the
test for equality. Therefore, the single record in q
Internal Message Code: MESSAGE GSB
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
I want to remove those warnings and errors please can any body help me.
Regards,
Shashikumar.G

Hi Sashi,
1) The LOOP statement error is coming because, you must have used LOOP AT itab WHERE ... something like this.. this means that you are limiting theh records processed in the LOOP. Under this case you can not use AT events..
To use AT events, fill another internal table with the records that you want to process and use AT event in loop at that table..
2) You have used SELECT SINGLE in your code, but the select query does not have the full primary key in the WHERE condition.. it is mandatory to define complete primary key value so that the system will get only single record...
To remove this error, instead of SELECT SINGLE, use SELECT..UP TO 1 ROWS..
Let the query be as it is.. only remove SINGLE keyword and put UP TO 1 ROWS after the FROM clause and Before WHERE clause...
Thanks and Best Regards,
Vikas Bittera.

Syntax Check for *.java files

Hello erveryone,
I'm wondering if anybody has an advice how to enable (if possible) syntax check in JDeveloper 10.1.2.
For example:
public String toString() {
String result = "test";
The missing return statement is not shown in the editor. It's only shown by the compiler.
Thanks in advance
Alex

Thanks for your reply,
I checked out the links you mentioned, but I think the informations about the code editor and the code assist are not very detailed.
I checked out the tool you mentioned above (PMD) and it was quite fine unsing it for one class. But I tried to check about 300 classes at a time and it hangs after a few minutes.
So I think it's a little improvement, but I will still look for a tool compareable to eclipse.

Warning assigning 0 to BA... in ABAP syntax check on DELETE itab statement

Hello,
I didn't see an answer to that question in the forum/internet, nor in SAP notes, so I post it.
I have a 7.01 system, and this code:
TYPES : BEGIN OF ts_record,
          carrid    TYPE S_CARR_ID,
          employees TYPE p,
        END OF ts_record.
TYPES tt_record TYPE SORTED TABLE OF ts_record
      WITH UNIQUE KEY carrid.
DATA lt_record TYPE tt_record.
DELETE lt_record WHERE employees = 0.
The syntax check sends the following warning and places the cursor on the number "0" of the DELETE statement:
Assigning "0" to "BA" could result in data loss. It is therefore not
possible to optimize the LOOP. The components and values should have
identical types The types have identical types
Same thing if I make the internal table hashed or non-unique.
The warning is removed only if I replace 0 by a data object of same type as EMPLOYEES, or if I make the internal table standard.
Do you now why, I mean what is the intrinsec kernel algorithm that would make something slow? (and why a "data loss"?, what is "BA", is it a wrong translation or something else?)
Thank you
Sandra

Hi Gautham,
So, it would mean something like "hey do you know you could access the internal table by using = on the key fields and it will be optimized", like a kind of advertisement, but sent only in a few cases, I don't see why in other ones they are not sent... Hopefully we don't have this warning with READ TABLE. Maybe this warning is more useful in 7.02 with secondary index... ( BTW could somebody test if the warning is sent in 7.02 systems? )
In German, I get a better message I think, so "BA" is a bug:
Die Zuweisung von "0" nach "EMPLOYEES" ist potentiell nicht
verlustfrei. Es sind deshalb keine Optimierungen beim LOOP möglich.
Bitte eine identische Typisierung bei Komponenten und Werten benutzen.
which is google-translated:
The assignment of "0" after "EMPLOYEES" is potentially not
without loss. It is therefore not possible to use optimizations for LOOP.
Please identical components and typing in values.
which seems a better translation.
Hi Maximilian,
you're right, <= keeps the warning from being displayed, that's fun!
Well, I guess the warning is not very welcome, I hope that will be changed in the future!
Thanks for your valuable answers
Sandra
Edited by: Sandra Rossi 1 minute later
One more question: Is there a way to suppress this warning from the syntax check?

Doubt in Extended Syntax check

Hi all ,
              I am facing a problem when i do a Extended Syntax check for a program . The message i am getting is as follows :
Messages for CALL FUNCTION interfaces(Todo Prio3)
Program: SAPLZC_BWSPI Include: LZC_BWSPIF01 Row:    496 [Prio 3]
No EXCEPTION to set SY_SUBRC Declared for CALL FUNCTION 'FIRST_DAY_IN_TP_GET'
Thus the value of SY-SUBRC is always 0
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
can anyone suggest me how to correct it .
thanks,
kumaran

SUPPOSE IF YOU HAVE YOUR CODE AS :
CALL FUNCTION XYZ
IMPORTING -
EXPORTING----
JUST WRITE
CALL FUNCTION XYZ                  "#EC *
IMPORTING -
EXPORTING----
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
ENDIF.
THATS ENOUGH.
OR ELSE TRY.
CALL FUNCTION XYZ
IMPORTING -
EXPORTING----
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.                       "#EC *
ENDIF.

Extended syntax check

In ECC 6.0, I have two errors in my extended syntax check
1).   Char. strings w/o text elements will not be translated:
'Store%'
(The message can be hidden with "#EC NOTEXT)
with below coding
SELECT kunnr name2 j_3astcu
    FROM kna1
    INTO TABLE gt_kna1
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_soldto1
    WHERE ( name2    LIKE 'STORE%'
     OR     name2    LIKE 'Store%'
     OR     name2    LIKE 'store%'
     OR     name2    LIKE 'DC%'
    AND     land1    =    'US' )
    OR   ( j_3astcu = gt_soldto1-store_no
    AND    land1     = 'US' ).
2).
SELECT-OPTIONS : s_mail1 FOR somlreci1-receiver NO INTERVALS.
The current ABAP command is obsolete
With "LOOP AT itab", one of the additions "INTO", "ASSIGNING", or "TRANSPORTING NO
FIELDS" is required in the 00 context
Internal Message Code: LOOP 012
(The message cannot be hidden using pseudo-comment "#EC .., bzw. durch SET
EXTENDED CHECK OFF/ON)
    LOOP AT s_mail1.
*-----If email id entered on the selection screen doesnot contain
    '@' and '.', then give relevent message to user as popup.*
      IF s_mail1-low NA gc_at OR s_mail1-low NA gc_dot.
        MESSAGE e038(zs) WITH text-m08 text-m09 text-m13.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
Please suggest me howcan I avoid string Store% as well as select-option.

In my opinion, the answers given to your first question so far, are wrong. When there is a specific reason for using a text string in a select, then it should remain precisely as that. So you should use "#EC NOTEXT. It is wrong to put them in a text element, as they will never be translated.
The extended syntax check doesn't exist so that you can remove the cause, it is so that you can address it. Many violations of the extended syntax checker have a valid reason. That's why you get the "#EC exceptions. But if you use them, then make sure you can justify it.
matt

How to Disable Syntax Checker for DDL Generation

Would like to include shell script commands before a create table statement. Modified the .xdb but PowerDesigner does not recognize this code as it is not native to the database. Is there a way to disable the syntax check so that the create table script can include these statements rather than a number of errors? Running v15.2 of PowerDesigner. Any feedback would be appreciated!

Hello. Yes. To be more specific, want to be able to run the create table DDL for Teradata from BTEQ. I added the following statements to a customized version of the Terada .xdb for the table BeforeCreate:
.logon ${TD_SERVER}/${TD_USERNAME},${TD_PASSWORD}
select 1
from dbc.tables
where DatabaseName = [%QUALIFIER%]
and TableName = '%TABLE%'
.if errorcode > 0 then .goto error
.if activitycount <> 1 then .goto create_tbl
drop table %TABLE%;
.if errorcode > 0 then .goto error
.label create_tbl
The DDL shows up with syntax errors as follows. So clearly, there is something that is attempting to validate the code:
3 error(s), 0 warning(s)
(1) (Table "DATE_DIM"):
   [syntax error] unknown macro: logon ${TD_SERVER}/${TD_USERNAME},${TD_PASSWORD}
(8) (Table "DATE_DIM"):
   [syntax error] condition parsing error
(16) (Table "DATE_DIM"):
   [syntax error] expecting .endif

Text Editor & ABAP Syntax Check

Hi all,
I've included a text editor box into my project to allow the user to key in ABAP codes. i got the codes of a sample program but i'm not sure how it works. can anyone kind enough to explain to me how to add buttons or assign functions to the buttons?
secondly, because i allow free-text for the user to key in ABAP codes, is there a function to check the syntax of the codes entered by the user?
i'll reward handsomely for any help rendered and it will be better if you could include sample codes as well(:
thanks!!! (:
SAMPLE CODE FOR TEXT EDITOR:
IF CODE_EDITOR IS INITIAL.
    CREATE OBJECT CODE_EDITOR_CONTAINER
       EXPORTING
         CONTAINER_NAME = 'GEN_CODE'
       EXCEPTIONS
         CNTL_ERROR = 1
         CNTL_SYSTEM_ERROR = 2
         CREATE_ERROR = 3
         LIFETIME_ERROR = 4
         LIFETIME_DYNPRO_DYNPRO_LINK = 5.
    CREATE OBJECT CODE_EDITOR
      EXPORTING
        PARENT = CODE_EDITOR_CONTAINER
        WORDWRAP_MODE =
        CL_GUI_TEXTEDIT=>WORDWRAP_OFF
          CL_GUI_TEXTEDIT=>WORDWRAP_AT_FIXED_POSITION
        CL_GUI_TEXTEDIT=>WORDWRAP_AT_WINDOWBORDER
        WORDWRAP_POSITION = G_EDITOR_LENGTH
        WORDWRAP_TO_LINEBREAK_MODE = CL_GUI_TEXTEDIT=>TRUE.
ENDIF.
Edited by: Leslie Koh on Jan 18, 2008 4:28 AM

Hi Leslie
There is a abap key word which may help your purpose to do the syntax check. Please check the key work "SYNTAX-CHECK FOR itab " to be more in details,
Basic form :
SYNTAX-CHECK FOR itab ...MESSAGE f ...LINE g ...WORD h.
Extras:
1. ... PROGRAM f1
2. ... INCLUDE f2
3. ... OFFSET f3
4. ... TRACE-TABLE itab1
5. ... DIRECTORY ENTRY f4
6. ... REPLACING f5
7. ... FRAME ENTRY f6
8. ... MESSAGE-ID f7
9. ... ID id TABLE itab2
10.... SHORTDUMP-ID f8
11.... FILTER f9
This syntax will help you to check the syntax errors of ABAP program passed as internal table. You can get the entries keyed in by user in editor control through class method CL_GUI_TEXTEDIT->GET_TEXT_AS_R3TABLE in your PAI.
Hope this helps !
Kind Regards
Ranganath

Syntax check of code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for