T3/RMI packet size very large
In order to determine our bandwidth requirements, we recently placed a
sniffer on our network to analyze our message packets. We've noticed
that
our packets are very large and it appears that much of the overhead is
in
the overhead of RMI or T3.
Here are some sample numbers for similar message between a single client
and our WLS server.
T3: 3500 bytes
T3 w/ HTTP tunneling: 5500 bytes
IIOP: 1250 bytes (using VisiBroker ORB talking to Smalltalk ORB)
As you can see the T3 packet size is 65% larger than the same packet
sent
via Corba/IIOP. It also appears that with RMI, all of the full class
names
and variable names are also being passed along within the packet. Are we
missing something or is this an understood fact? Is there anything we
can
do to fix this problem? As it stands, our bandwidth requirements to
support
the larger T3 packet size are astronomical and this would not be
feasible
in a production environment. Does anyone know what is the typical
percentage
overhead increase per packet. It appears to be about 400%.
Our WLS environment is described below.
Edwin Marcial
Continental Power Exchange
Weblogic Environment
WLS Server
WLS 4.51 w/ Service Pack 7
NativeIO = true
ExecuteThreadCount = 40
readTimeoutMillis=5000
readTimeoutMillisSSL=10000
Dell Pentium III 600 w/ 512 MB memory
JavaSoft 1.2.2
-ms128 -mx350
WLS Client
Java Application
t3s and https (using WLS RMI)
JavaSoft 1.1.7b
typically Pentium 200 MHz or better w/ 64MB or more
I think you are kind of stuck with this. RMI is a heavyweight protocol in
comparision to IIOP. If the message sizes really bother you that much you
may want to look into and a EJB implementation that maps RMI to IIOP such as
the Inprise Application Server which sits atop the VisiBroker ORB.
-paul
Edwin Marcial <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
In order to determine our bandwidth requirements, we recently placed a
sniffer on our network to analyze our message packets. We've noticed
that
our packets are very large and it appears that much of the overhead is
in
the overhead of RMI or T3.
Here are some sample numbers for similar message between a single client
and our WLS server.
T3: 3500 bytes
T3 w/ HTTP tunneling: 5500 bytes
IIOP: 1250 bytes (using VisiBroker ORB talking to Smalltalk ORB)
As you can see the T3 packet size is 65% larger than the same packet
sent
via Corba/IIOP. It also appears that with RMI, all of the full class
names
and variable names are also being passed along within the packet. Are we
missing something or is this an understood fact? Is there anything we
can
do to fix this problem? As it stands, our bandwidth requirements to
support
the larger T3 packet size are astronomical and this would not be
feasible
in a production environment. Does anyone know what is the typical
percentage
overhead increase per packet. It appears to be about 400%.
Our WLS environment is described below.
Edwin Marcial
Continental Power Exchange
Weblogic Environment
WLS Server
WLS 4.51 w/ Service Pack 7
NativeIO = true
ExecuteThreadCount = 40
readTimeoutMillis=5000
readTimeoutMillisSSL=10000
Dell Pentium III 600 w/ 512 MB memory
JavaSoft 1.2.2
-ms128 -mx350
WLS Client
Java Application
t3s and https (using WLS RMI)
JavaSoft 1.1.7b
typically Pentium 200 MHz or better w/ 64MB or more
Similar Messages
-
Slow Performance or XDP File size very large
There have been a few reports of people having slow performance in their forms (tyically for Dynamic forms) or file sizes of XDP files being very large.
These are the symptoms of a problem with cut and paste in Designer where a Process Instruction (PI) used to control how Designer displays a specific palette is repeated many many times. If you look in your XDP source and see this line repeated more than once then you have the issue:
The problem has been resolved by applying a style sheet to the XDP and removing the instruction (until now). A patch has been released that will fix the cut and paste issue as well as repair your templates when you open them in a designer with the patch applied.
Here is a blog entry that describes the patch as well as where to get it.
http://blogs.adobe.com/livecycle/2009/03/post.htmlMy XDP file grow up to 145mb before i decided to see what was actually happening.
It appears that the LvieCycle Designer ES program sometimes writes alot of redundant data... the same line millions of times over & over again.
I wrote this small java program which reduced the size up to 111KB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (wow what a bug that must have been!!!)
Here's the sourcecode:
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.FileReader;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
public class MakeSmaller {
private static final String DELETE_STRING = " <?templateDesigner StyleID aped3?>";
public static void main(String... args) {
BufferedReader br = null;
BufferedWriter bw = null;
try {
br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(args[0]));
bw = new BufferedWriter(new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(args[0] + ".small")));
String line = null;
boolean firstOccurence = true;
while((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
if (line.equals(DELETE_STRING)) {
if (firstOccurence) {
bw.write(line + "\n");
firstOccurence = false;
} else {
bw.write(line + "\n");
firstOccurence = true;
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
if (br != null) {
try {
br.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
if (bw != null) {
try {
bw.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
File that gets generated is the same as the xdp file (same location) but gets the extension .small. Just in case something goes wrong the original file is NOT modified as you can see in the source code. And yes Designer REALLY wrote that line like a gazillion times in the .xdp file (shame on the programmers!!)
You can also see that i also write the first occurrence to the small file just in case its needed... -
I've noticed that file sizes in Numbers are very large. I was using Excel for a long time and all the files I created were between 20-30KB. The files consisted of an Excel workbook, with 1-2 worksheets in it. The same files in Numbers are 200-300KB and if I save them over the network from another computer to my computer, they jump up to over 1MB. Any ideas on this?
Hello
Nothing to do with graphics items.
An XL file as well as an AppleWorks one is a compiled document in which many components are stored in a very compact shape. One byte was sufficient in AW to represent an operand as they where aboutone hundred.
In Numbers, everything is described in pure text with complementary delimiters.
When a formula uses the operand "COUNTBLANK" this one appears with its 10 letters.
In XL as well as in AW6, a date is stored as a floating number while in Numbers it's stored as the string "mercredi 23 janvier 2008 22:33:19"
Sama thing for every attributes of every cell.
So this results in a huge file store in XML format. To spare space, when we close a document, the XML file is packed in .gz format.
This is the Index.xml.gz file that we may see clicking a Numbers document wit ctrl depressed and selecting the contextual menu item "Show Package's contents".
Double click onto Index.xml.gz will unpack it.
giving the expanded Index.xml file.
I assumes that they are applications dedicated to XML files.
I don't know them so I just drag and drop the XML file onto a free text editor named Bean which I find really interesting.
Doing that, we may examine the file's contents.
If someone knows a correct free application able to open and display correctly the XML files, I'm interested
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE mercredi 23 janvier 2008 22:49:23) -
Compressor mpg 2 files sizes very large
I have just begun using FCP 7 and its version of Compressor for years.
I have produced two school videos on FCP X, (the latest updated version) and have to output to a file type to be taken to make a dvd from it.
Please correct me if there is any reason why this shouldn't be a MPEG 2Transport Stream from Compressor 4.1.2.
When I put out either file, both about 1.5 hours long they are about 8 GBs which surprised me. Why wouldn't they be closer to 4 GB since not everyone presses DL DVDs?
I feel the old compressor had more controls over how to handle the files to compress the size more. I oftenwent out to DVDSP and authored in there and it was rather idiot proof knowing that you could set that its a DVD and it HAD to fit.
How can I get this file smaller without killing its quality?
Thanks in advanced.There were more DVD presets in the older version…"Best quality 90 minutes", and s forth. But regardless of the preset, we could always adjust the bit rate in the encoder to your liking.
Now it's all in an integrated window and there is only a single preset to start the adjustments from. But even though it looks a little different, the flexibility of the tools is pretty similar.
Good luck with your project.
Russ -
Is there a way to split a very large 1 page pdf into letter size multiple page pdf?
I often have very large single page pdfs that need to be printed onto letter size paper. Usually I don't have access to the printer where I'm working so I have to send the file to someone for printing.
I have AXI pro, they don't.
I want to make sure the job is printed as I specify and most of the users are using Reader. So I want to give the someone the pdf ready to print sized in legal. This requires manipulation of the pdf that I don't seem to be able to figure out how to do.
In older versions of Acrobat, I could print to a new pdf and designate the page size. Acrobat would create the multipage pdf. The newer versions don't allow this.
With OSX 10.8 & AXI you can't save, export, split a one page (68" x 16") document into multiple page letter size (16 pages) pdf.
Perhaps this can be done by printing to eps and running through distiller again or something else, but I'm stumped at the moment.
Any suggestions of how to attach this would be appreciated.
Thanks.That's a tough one. Acrobat is not designed for tiling PDF files to create another PDF. That's really what you're asking. There is the option to PRINT to a PDF, and turn on the Poster feature. If were in Windows where there is a real Adobe PDF printer driver, you could probably use that feature. But for various reasons (too complicated to describe here), that was withdrawn on the Macintosh.
If you have a copy of Adobe InDesign, and if you installed an Adobe PDF 9 PPD file (see description below), it could be done in a somewhat awkward way. InDesign allows you to place PDF files so you would need to make a page of the proper size and place your large PDF:
Then after installing the Adobe PDF 9 PPD file, you could choose File > Print. Then choose to print a PostScript file to the Adobe PDF 9.0 PPD file. In the Setup panel, you'd choose a Letter size page. Then you'd choose the Tile option at the bottom and set the Overlap amount:
Then you'd save the PostScript file and process through Distiller.
My blog post below describes how to find and install the Adobe PDF 9.0 PPD file:
http://indesignsecrets.com/creating-postscript-files-in-snow-leopard-for-older-print-workf lows.php -
letters are very large. I have tried changing the font but it doesn't help. This is very annoying. How can I remedy this?
I use these settings, so try them:
Tools > Options > Display > Formatting tab
or
Menu icon > Options > Options > Display > Formatting tab
* eg: Default font: Arial
* size 14
Note: this sets the default font to be used in both display of messages and the font to use as default in composing messages.
Under Plain text Messages
* select: Style : Regular Size: Regular and colour Black
* Click on 'Advanced' button
* make sure all sizes - 14
* select; 'allow messages to use other fonts'
* Select; 'Use fixed width fonts for plain text messages'
* click on OK
Note: This will use the default eg: Arial to be used, but allows the display of messages to use other fonts if the sender specified them.
then at top click on 'Composition' > General tab
note: This sets the default composing text colour and background colour.
under HTML
* Font: Variable width
* Size : Medium
* Select a text colour for writing emails eg: Blue
* Select background colur eg: white
click on OK to save and close Options. -
File size is very large in 7.0 coamparing to 3.X
Hi,
When saving the query in 7.0 the file size become very large as compare to saving the same query with the same amount of data in 3.X. Is there any solution to take care of this problem and reduced the file size in 7.0. Please advice.
Thanks
IsacHi,
The file size increases due to the high formatting options in BI 7.0.
Remove the formatting option from the work book setting in the Bex analyzer in design mode.
REDDY -
Very large bdump file sizes, how to solve?
Hi gurus,
I currently always find my disk space is not enough, after checking, it is the oraclexe/admin/bdump, there's currently 3.2G for it, my database is very small, only holding datas of 10mb.
It didn't happen before, only currently.
I don't know why it happened, I have deleted some old files in that folder, but today I found it is still very large compare to my database.
I am running an apex application with xe, the applcaitions works well, we didn't see anything wrong, but only the bdump file very big.
any tip to solve this? thanks
here comes my alert_xe.log file content:
hu Jun 03 16:15:43 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5600.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:15:48 2010
Restarting dead background process MMON
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=5452
Thu Jun 03 16:15:52 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:16:16 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:20:54 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:21:50 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:25:56 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:26:18 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:30:58 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:31:19 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:36:00 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5452.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:36:46 2010
Restarting dead background process MMON
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=1312
Thu Jun 03 16:36:49 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:37:13 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:41:51 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:42:13 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:46:54 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:47:17 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:51:57 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:52:35 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:56:58 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1312.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:57:10 2010
Restarting dead background process MMON
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=3428
Thu Jun 03 16:57:13 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 16:57:52 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:02:16 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:02:48 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:07:18 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:08:01 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:12:18 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:12:41 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:17:21 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3428.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:17:34 2010
Restarting dead background process MMON
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=5912
Thu Jun 03 17:17:37 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:18:01 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:22:37 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:23:01 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:27:39 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:28:02 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:32:42 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:33:07 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:37:45 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_5912.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:38:40 2010
Restarting dead background process MMON
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=1660
Thu Jun 03 17:38:43 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:39:17 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:42:54 2010
The value (30) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
kupprdp: master process DM00 started with pid=31, OS id=6116
to execute - SYS.KUPM$MCP.MAIN('SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01', 'SYSTEM', 'KUPC$C_1_20100603174259', 'KUPC$S_1_20100603174259', 0);
Thu Jun 03 17:43:38 2010
The value (30) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
kupprdp: master process DM00 started with pid=32, OS id=2792
to execute - SYS.KUPM$MCP.MAIN('SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01', 'SYSTEM', 'KUPC$C_1_20100603174338', 'KUPC$S_1_20100603174338', 0);
Thu Jun 03 17:43:44 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:44:06 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:44:47 2010
The value (30) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
kupprdp: master process DM00 started with pid=33, OS id=3492
to execute - SYS.KUPM$MCP.MAIN('SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01', 'SYSTEM', 'KUPC$C_1_20100603174448', 'KUPC$S_1_20100603174448', 0);
kupprdp: worker process DW01 started with worker id=1, pid=34, OS id=748
to execute - SYS.KUPW$WORKER.MAIN('SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01', 'SYSTEM');
Thu Jun 03 17:45:28 2010
Memory Notification: Library Cache Object loaded into SGA
Heap size 5684K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)
KGL object name :SELECT /*+rule*/ SYS_XMLGEN(VALUE(KU$), XMLFORMAT.createFormat2('TABLE_T', '7')), KU$.OBJ_NUM ,KU$.ANC_OBJ.NAME ,KU$.ANC_OBJ.OWNER_NAME ,KU$.ANC_OBJ.TYPE_NAME ,KU$.BASE_OBJ.NAME ,KU$.BASE_OBJ.OWNER_NAME ,KU$.BASE_OBJ.TYPE_NAME ,KU$.SPARE1 ,KU$.XMLSCHEMACOLS ,KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.NAME ,KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.NAME ,'TABLE' ,KU$.PROPERTY ,KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.OWNER_NAME ,KU$.TS_NAME ,KU$.TRIGFLAG FROM SYS.KU$_FHTABLE_VIEW KU$ WHERE NOT (BITAND (KU$.PROPERTY,8192)=8192) AND NOT BITAND(KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.FLAGS,128)!=0 AND KU$.OBJ_NU
Thu Jun 03 17:45:28 2010
Memory Notification: Library Cache Object loaded into SGA
Heap size 5681K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)
Details in trace file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_dw01_748.trc
KGL object name :SELECT /*+rule*/ SYS_XMLGEN(VALUE(KU$), XMLFORMAT.createFormat2('TABLE_T', '7')), KU$.OBJ_NUM ,KU$.ANC_OBJ.NAME ,KU$.ANC_OBJ.OWNER_NAME ,KU$.ANC_OBJ.TYPE_NAME ,KU$.BASE_OBJ.NAME ,KU$.BASE_OBJ.OWNER_NAME ,KU$.BASE_OBJ.TYPE_NAME ,KU$.SPARE1 ,KU$.XMLSCHEMACOLS ,KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.NAME ,KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.NAME ,'TABLE' ,KU$.PROPERTY ,KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.OWNER_NAME ,KU$.TS_NAME ,KU$.TRIGFLAG FROM SYS.KU$_FHTABLE_VIEW KU$ WHERE NOT (BITAND (KU$.PROPERTY,8192)=8192) AND NOT BITAND(KU$.SCHEMA_OBJ.FLAGS,128)!=0 AND KU$.OBJ_NU
Thu Jun 03 17:48:47 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:49:17 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:53:49 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Jun 03 17:54:28 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_1660.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Dump file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\alert_xe.log
Fri Jun 04 07:46:55 2010
ORACLE V10.2.0.1.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=14 vsnxtr=3
Windows XP Version V5.1 Service Pack 3
CPU : 2 - type 586, 1 Physical Cores
Process Affinity : 0x00000000
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:1653M/2047M, Ph+PgF:4706M/4958M, VA:1944M/2047M
Fri Jun 04 07:46:55 2010
Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
Fri Jun 04 07:47:06 2010
LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 100
LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 80
Picked latch-free SCN scheme 2
Using LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_10 parameter default value as USE_DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST
Autotune of undo retention is turned on.
IMODE=BR
ILAT =33
LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
SYS auditing is disabled
ksdpec: called for event 13740 prior to event group initialization
Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.1.0.
System parameters with non-default values:
processes = 200
sessions = 300
license_max_sessions = 100
license_sessions_warning = 80
sga_max_size = 838860800
__shared_pool_size = 260046848
shared_pool_size = 209715200
__large_pool_size = 25165824
__java_pool_size = 4194304
__streams_pool_size = 8388608
spfile = C:\ORACLEXE\APP\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\SERVER\DBS\SPFILEXE.ORA
sga_target = 734003200
control_files = C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\CONTROL.DBF
__db_cache_size = 432013312
compatible = 10.2.0.1.0
db_recovery_file_dest = D:\
db_recovery_file_dest_size= 5368709120
undo_management = AUTO
undo_tablespace = UNDO
remote_login_passwordfile= EXCLUSIVE
dispatchers = (PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=XEXDB)
shared_servers = 10
job_queue_processes = 1000
audit_file_dest = C:\ORACLEXE\APP\ORACLE\ADMIN\XE\ADUMP
background_dump_dest = C:\ORACLEXE\APP\ORACLE\ADMIN\XE\BDUMP
user_dump_dest = C:\ORACLEXE\APP\ORACLE\ADMIN\XE\UDUMP
core_dump_dest = C:\ORACLEXE\APP\ORACLE\ADMIN\XE\CDUMP
db_name = XE
open_cursors = 300
os_authent_prefix =
pga_aggregate_target = 209715200
PMON started with pid=2, OS id=3044
MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=3052
DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=3196
LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=3200
CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=3204
SMON started with pid=8, OS id=3208
RECO started with pid=9, OS id=3212
CJQ0 started with pid=10, OS id=3216
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=3220
MMNL started with pid=12, OS id=3224
Fri Jun 04 07:47:31 2010
starting up 1 dispatcher(s) for network address '(ADDRESS=(PARTIAL=YES)(PROTOCOL=TCP))'...
starting up 10 shared server(s) ...
Oracle Data Guard is not available in this edition of Oracle.
PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=3048
Fri Jun 04 07:47:41 2010
alter database mount exclusive
Fri Jun 04 07:47:54 2010
Setting recovery target incarnation to 2
Fri Jun 04 07:47:56 2010
Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 2601933156
Fri Jun 04 07:47:56 2010
Database mounted in Exclusive Mode
Completed: alter database mount exclusive
Fri Jun 04 07:47:57 2010
alter database open
Fri Jun 04 07:48:00 2010
Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads
Fri Jun 04 07:48:01 2010
Started redo scan
Fri Jun 04 07:48:03 2010
Completed redo scan
16441 redo blocks read, 442 data blocks need recovery
Fri Jun 04 07:48:04 2010
Started redo application at
Thread 1: logseq 1575, block 48102
Fri Jun 04 07:48:05 2010
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 1575 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0 errs 0: D:\XE\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_1_4CT6N7TC_.LOG
Fri Jun 04 07:48:07 2010
Completed redo application
Fri Jun 04 07:48:07 2010
Completed crash recovery at
Thread 1: logseq 1575, block 64543, scn 27413940
442 data blocks read, 442 data blocks written, 16441 redo blocks read
Fri Jun 04 07:48:09 2010
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES
ARC0 started with pid=25, OS id=3288
ARC1 started with pid=26, OS id=3292
Fri Jun 04 07:48:10 2010
ARC0: Archival started
ARC1: Archival started
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES COMPLETE
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1576
Thread 1 opened at log sequence 1576
Current log# 3 seq# 1576 mem# 0: D:\XE\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_3_4CT6N1SD_.LOG
Successful open of redo thread 1
Fri Jun 04 07:48:13 2010
ARC0: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES
Fri Jun 04 07:48:13 2010
ARC1: Becoming the 'no FAL' ARCH
Fri Jun 04 07:48:13 2010
ARC1: Becoming the 'no SRL' ARCH
Fri Jun 04 07:48:13 2010
ARC2: Archival started
ARC0: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES COMPLETE
ARC0: Becoming the heartbeat ARCH
Fri Jun 04 07:48:13 2010
SMON: enabling cache recovery
ARC2 started with pid=27, OS id=3580
Fri Jun 04 07:48:17 2010
db_recovery_file_dest_size of 5120 MB is 49.00% used. This is a
user-specified limit on the amount of space that will be used by this
database for recovery-related files, and does not reflect the amount of
space available in the underlying filesystem or ASM diskgroup.
Fri Jun 04 07:48:31 2010
Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 1.
Fri Jun 04 07:48:31 2010
SMON: enabling tx recovery
Fri Jun 04 07:48:31 2010
Database Characterset is AL32UTF8
replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)
Starting background process QMNC
QMNC started with pid=28, OS id=2412
Fri Jun 04 07:48:51 2010
Completed: alter database open
Fri Jun 04 07:49:22 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:49:32 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:49:52 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:49:57 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:54:10 2010
Shutting down archive processes
Fri Jun 04 07:54:15 2010
ARCH shutting down
ARC2: Archival stopped
Fri Jun 04 07:54:53 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:55:08 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:56:25 2010
Starting control autobackup
Fri Jun 04 07:56:27 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\udump\xe_ora_488.trc:
Fri Jun 04 07:56:28 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\udump\xe_ora_488.trc:
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_21
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_20
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_17
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_16
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_14
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_12
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_09
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_07
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_06
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2009_04_03
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
Fri Jun 04 07:56:29 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\udump\xe_ora_488.trc:
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_21
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_20
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_17
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_16
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_14
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_12
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_09
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_07
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_06
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
ORA-17624: 无法删除目录 D:\XE\BACKUPSET\2009_04_03
ORA-27093: 无法删除目录
Control autobackup written to DISK device
handle 'D:\XE\AUTOBACKUP\2010_06_04\O1_MF_S_720777385_60JJ9BNZ_.BKP'
Fri Jun 04 07:56:38 2010
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1577
Current log# 1 seq# 1577 mem# 0: D:\XE\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_1_4CT6N7TC_.LOG
Fri Jun 04 07:56:56 2010
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 1578
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 1 seq# 1577 mem# 0: D:\XE\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_1_4CT6N7TC_.LOG
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1578
Current log# 3 seq# 1578 mem# 0: D:\XE\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_3_4CT6N1SD_.LOG
Fri Jun 04 07:57:04 2010
Memory Notification: Library Cache Object loaded into SGA
Heap size 2208K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)
KGL object name :XDB.XDbD/PLZ01TcHgNAgAIIegtw==
Fri Jun 04 07:59:54 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jun 04 07:59:58 2010
Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_3220.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []Hi Gurus,
there's a error ora-00600 in the big trc files as below, this is only part of this file, this file is more than 45mb in size:
xe_mmon_4424.trc
Dump file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_mmon_4424.trc
Fri Jun 04 17:03:22 2010
ORACLE V10.2.0.1.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=14 vsnxtr=3
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
Windows XP Version V5.1 Service Pack 3
CPU : 2 - type 586, 1 Physical Cores
Process Affinity : 0x00000000
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:992M/2047M, Ph+PgF:3422M/4958M, VA:1011M/2047M
Instance name: xe
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 11
Windows thread id: 4424, image: ORACLE.EXE (MMON)
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2010-06-04 17:03:22.265
*** SESSION ID:(284.23) 2010-06-04 17:03:22.265
*** 2010-06-04 17:03:22.265
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kjhn_post_ha_alert0-862], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Current SQL statement for this session:
BEGIN :success := dbms_ha_alerts_prvt.check_ha_resources; END;
----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
object line object
handle number name
41982E80 418 package body SYS.DBMS_HA_ALERTS_PRVT
41982E80 552 package body SYS.DBMS_HA_ALERTS_PRVT
41982E80 305 package body SYS.DBMS_HA_ALERTS_PRVT
419501A0 1 anonymous block
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
ksedst+38 CALLrel ksedst1+0 0 1
ksedmp+898 CALLrel ksedst+0 0
ksfdmp+14 CALLrel ksedmp+0 3
_kgerinv+140 CALLreg 00000000 8EF0A38 3
kgeasnmierr+19 CALLrel kgerinv+0 8EF0A38 6610020 3672F70 0
6538808
kjhnpost_ha_alert CALLrel _kgeasnmierr+0 8EF0A38 6610020 3672F70 0
0+2909
__PGOSF57__kjhn_pos CALLrel kjhnpost_ha_alert 88 B21C4D0 B21C4D8 B21C4E0
t_ha_alert_plsql+43 0+0 B21C4E8 B21C4F0 B21C4F8
8 B21C500 B21C50C 0 FFFFFFFF 0
0 0 6
_spefcmpa+415 CALLreg 00000000
spefmccallstd+147 CALLrel spefcmpa+0 65395B8 16 B21C5AC 653906C 0
pextproc+58 CALLrel spefmccallstd+0 6539874 6539760 6539628
65395B8 0
__PGOSF302__peftrus CALLrel _pextproc+0
ted+115
_psdexsp+192 CALLreg 00000000 6539874
_rpiswu2+426 CALLreg 00000000 6539510
psdextp+567 CALLrel rpiswu2+0 41543288 0 65394F0 2 6539528
0 65394D0 0 2CD9E68 0 6539510
0
_pefccal+452 CALLreg 00000000
pefcal+174 CALLrel pefccal+0 6539874
pevmFCAL+128 CALLrel _pefcal+0
pfrinstrFCAL+55 CALLrel pevmFCAL+0 AF74F48 3DFB92B8
pfrrunno_tool+56 CALL??? 00000000 AF74F48 3DFBB728 AF74F84
pfrrun+781 CALLrel pfrrun_no_tool+0 AF74F48 3DFBB28C AF74F84
plsqlrun+738 CALLrel _pfrrun+0 AF74F48
peicnt+247 CALLrel plsql_run+0 AF74F48 1 0
kkxexe+413 CALLrel peicnt+0
opiexe+5529 CALLrel kkxexe+0 AF7737C
kpoal8+2165 CALLrel opiexe+0 49 3 653A4FC
_opiodr+1099 CALLreg 00000000 5E 0 653CBAC
kpoodr+483 CALLrel opiodr+0
_xupirtrc+1434 CALLreg 00000000 67384BC 5E 653CBAC 0 653CCBC
upirtrc+61 CALLrel xupirtrc+0 67384BC 5E 653CBAC 653CCBC
653D990 60FEF8B8 653E194
6736CD8 1 0 0
kpurcsc+100 CALLrel upirtrc+0 67384BC 5E 653CBAC 653CCBC
653D990 60FEF8B8 653E194
6736CD8 1 0 0
kpuexecv8+2815 CALLrel kpurcsc+0
kpuexec+2106 CALLrel kpuexecv8+0 673AE10 6736C4C 6736CD8 0 0
653EDE8
OCIStmtExecute+29 CALLrel kpuexec+0 673AE10 6736C4C 673AEC4 1 0 0
0 0 0
kjhnmmon_action+5 CALLrel _OCIStmtExecute+0 673AE10 6736C4C 673AEC4 1 0 0
26 0 0
kjhncheck_ha_reso CALLrel kjhnmmon_action+0 653EFCC 3E
urces+140
kebmronce_dispatc CALL??? 00000000
her+630
kebmronce_execute CALLrel kebmronce_dispatc
+12 her+0
_ksbcti+788 CALLreg 00000000 0 0
ksbabs+659 CALLrel ksbcti+0
kebmmmon_main+386 CALLrel _ksbabs+0 3C5DCB8
_ksbrdp+747 CALLreg 00000000 3C5DCB8
opirip+674 CALLrel ksbrdp+0
opidrv+857 CALLrel opirip+0 32 4 653FEBC
sou2o+45 CALLrel opidrv+0 32 4 653FEBC
opimaireal+227 CALLrel _sou2o+0 653FEB0 32 4 653FEBC
opimai+92 CALLrel opimai_real+0 3 653FEE8
BackgroundThreadSt CALLrel opimai+0
art@4+422
7C80B726 CALLreg 00000000
--------------------- Binary Stack Dump ---------------------
========== FRAME [1] (_ksedst+38 -> _ksedst1+0) ==========
Dump of memory from 0x065386DC to 0x065386EC
65386D0 065386EC [..S.]
65386E0 0040467B 00000000 00000001 [{F@.........]
========== FRAME [2] (_ksedmp+898 -> _ksedst+0) ==========
Dump of memory from 0x065386EC to 0x065387AC
65386E0 065387AC [..S.]
65386F0 00403073 00000000 53532E49 20464658 [[email protected] ]
6538700 54204D41 0000525A 00000000 08EF0EC0 [AM TZR..........]
6538710 6072D95A 08EF0EC5 03672F70 00000017 [Z.r`....p/g.....]
6538720 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
Repeat 1 times
6538740 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000017 [................]
6538750 08EF0B3C 08EF0B34 03672F70 08F017F0 [<...4...p/g.....]
6538760 603AA0D3 065387A8 00000001 00000000 [..:`..S.........]
6538770 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 [................]
6538780 00000000 08EF0A38 06610020 031E1D20 [....8... .a. ...]
6538790 00000000 065386F8 08EF0A38 06538D38 [......S.8...8.S.]
65387A0 0265187C 031C8860 FFFFFFFF [|.e.`.......]
========== FRAME [3] (_ksfdmp+14 -> _ksedmp+0) ==========
and the file is keeping increasing, though I have deleted a lot of this, but:
as I marked:
time size
15:23 pm 795mb
16:55 pm 959mb
17:01 pm 970mb
17:19 pm 990mb
Any solution for that?
Thanks!! -
HELP!! Very Large Spooling / File Size after Data Merge
My question is: If the image is the same and only the text is different why not use the same image over and over again?
Here is what happens...
Using CS3 and XP (P4 2.4Ghz, 1GB Ram, 256MB Video Card) I have taken a postcard pdf (the backside) placed it in a document, then I draw a text box. Then I select a data source and put the fields I wish to print (Name, address, zip, etc.) in the text box.
Now, under the Create Merged Document menu I select Multiple Records and then use the Multiple Records Layout tab to adjust the placement of this postcard on the page. I use the preview multiple records option to lay out 4 postcards on my page. Then I merge the document (it has 426 records).
Now that my merged document is created with four postcards per page and the mailing data on each card I go to print. When I print the file it spools up huge! The PDF I orginally placed in the document is 2.48 MB but when it spools I can only print 25 pages at a time and that still takes FOREVER. So again my question is... If the image is the same and only the text is different why not use the same image over and over again?
How can I prevent the gigantic spooling? I have tried putting the PDF on the master page and then using the document page to create the merged document and still the same result. I have also tried createing a merged document with just the addresses then adding the the pdf on the Master page afterward but again, huge filesize while spooling. Am I missing something? Any help is appreciated :)The size of the EMF spool file may become very large when you print a document that contains lots of raster data
View products that this article applies to.
Article ID : 919543
Last Review : June 7, 2006
Revision : 2.0
On This Page
SYMPTOMS
CAUSE
RESOLUTION
STATUS
MORE INFORMATION
Steps to reproduce the problem
SYMPTOMS
When you print a document that contains lots of raster data, the size of the Enhanced Metafile (EMF) spool file may become very large. Files such as Adobe .pdf files or Microsoft Word .doc documents may contain lots of raster data. Adobe .pdf files and Word .doc documents that contain gradients are even more likely to contain lots of raster data.
Back to the top
CAUSE
This problem occurs because Graphics Device Interface (GDI) does not compress raster data when the GDI processes EMF spool files and generates EMF spool files.
This problem is very prominent with printers that support higher resolutions. The size of the raster data increases by four times if the dots-per-inch (dpi) in the file increases by two times. For example, a .pdf file of 1 megabyte (MB) may generate an EMF spool file of 500 MB. Therefore, you may notice that the printing process decreases in performance.
Back to the top
RESOLUTION
To resolve this problem, bypass EMF spooling. To do this, follow these steps:1. Open the properties dialog box for the printer.
2. Click the Advanced tab.
3. Click the Print directly to the printer option.
Note This will disable all print processor-based features such as the following features: N-up
Watermark
Booklet printing
Driver collation
Scale-to-fit
Back to the top
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section.
Back to the top
MORE INFORMATION
Steps to reproduce the problem
1. Open the properties dialog box for any inbox printer.
2. Click the Advanced tab.
3. Make sure that the Print directly to the printer option is not selected.
4. Click to select the Keep printed documents check box.
5. Print an Adobe .pdf document that contains many groups of raster data.
6. Check the size of the EMF spool file. -
"Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted"
I get this error message whenever I try to access very large threads at my favorite debate site using Firefox vs. 4 or 5 on my desktop or laptop computers. I do not get the error using IE8.
The only fixes I have been able to find are for servers that have Wordpress and php.ini files.It works, thanks
-
Is it possible to change the size of the icons in Launchpad? Mine seem very large.
Thanks for the reply UKoC. You are close on the size. I would say they are about an inch to an inch and a half in width and only seven across the row. They just seem quite large on my display and I figured there would be an easy way. I kept thinking I just had to be missing the way for adjusting them since everything else seems to be so easy to personalize. Funny thing is that I have watched an online tutorial twice now on Apple's web site showing Launchpad and the icons shown there are smaller and more of them. I just thought I was missing the fix somehow. Thanks for confirming this.
-
All of the input fields in the browser are very large while other text is normal size. How do I fix this?
In some cases some sites headers will run together and sometimes overlap. Other sites will just show a portion of the site in a vertical box but not the full width of the screen and I can't adjust it.Applications -> Utilities -> Audio MIDI Setup; select the desired output device and click on the gear icon at the bottom, select 'Play alerts and sound effects through this device'.
-
I get a very large icons when I received a call. How can I get them normal size
I got a very large icons after receiving a call. How can I get normal size again?
You have Zoom on... double tap with three fingers to turn it off. Go into Settings > General > Accessibility to disable it.
See p. 243... http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iPhone_iOS4_User_Guide.pdf -
Mac Scanner file size is very large
I have recently scan some documents to my computer, however, I have notice some document file size are large, and some documents are small.
I accidentally scan a duplex document and single page. I find out that combine page increase each page by 100KB, consider the scanned single page is 20KB.
Both Scan do not have difference in scan quality.
It really bothers me because all previous scan unnecessary tripple in size.
Can any body explain about the anomaly?Hi,
The file size increases due to the high formatting options in BI 7.0.
Remove the formatting option from the work book setting in the Bex analyzer in design mode.
REDDY -
ORA-00385: cannot enable Very Large Memory with new buffer cache 11.2.0.2
[oracle@bnl11237dat01][DWH11]$ sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.2.0 Production on Mon Jun 20 09:19:49 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to an idle instance.
SQL> startup mount pfile=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/dbs//initDWH11.ora
ORA-00385: cannot enable Very Large Memory with new buffer cache parameters
DWH12.__large_pool_size=16777216
DWH11.__large_pool_size=16777216
DWH11.__oracle_base='/u01/app/oracle'#ORACLE_BASE set from environment
DWH12.__pga_aggregate_target=2902458368
DWH11.__pga_aggregate_target=2902458368
DWH12.__sga_target=4328521728
DWH11.__sga_target=4328521728
DWH12.__shared_io_pool_size=0
DWH11.__shared_io_pool_size=0
DWH12.__shared_pool_size=956301312
DWH11.__shared_pool_size=956301312
DWH12.__streams_pool_size=0
DWH11.__streams_pool_size=134217728
#*._realfree_heap_pagesize_hint=262144
#*._use_realfree_heap=TRUE
*.audit_file_dest='/u01/app/oracle/admin/DWH/adump'
*.audit_trail='db'
*.cluster_database=true
*.compatible='11.2.0.0.0'
*.control_files='/dborafiles/mdm_bn/dwh/oradata01/DWH/control01.ctl','/dborafiles/mdm_bn/dwh/orareco/DWH/control02.ctl'
*.db_block_size=8192
*.db_domain=''
*.db_name='DWH'
*.db_recovery_file_dest='/dborafiles/mdm_bn/dwh/orareco'
*.db_recovery_file_dest_size=7373586432
*.diagnostic_dest='/u01/app/oracle'
*.dispatchers='(PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=DWH1XDB)'
DWH12.instance_number=2
DWH11.instance_number=1
DWH11.local_listener='(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=bnl11237dat01-vip)(PORT=1521))))'
DWH12.local_listener='(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=bnl11237dat02-vip)(PORT=1521))))'
*.log_archive_dest_1='LOCATION=/dborafiles/mdm_bn/dwh/oraarch'
*.log_archive_format='DWH_%t_%s_%r.arc'
#*.memory_max_target=7226785792
*.memory_target=7226785792
*.open_cursors=1000
*.processes=500
*.remote_listener='LISTENERS_SCAN'
*.remote_login_passwordfile='exclusive'
*.sessions=555
DWH12.thread=2
DWH11.thread=1
DWH12.undo_tablespace='UNDOTBS2'
DWH11.undo_tablespace='UNDOTBS1'
SPFILE='/dborafiles/mdm_bn/dwh/oradata01/DWH/spfileDWH1.ora' # line added by Agent
[oracle@bnl11237dat01][DWH11]$ cat /etc/sysctl.conf
# Kernel sysctl configuration file for Red Hat Linux
# For binary values, 0 is disabled, 1 is enabled. See sysctl(8) and
# sysctl.conf(5) for more details.
# Controls IP packet forwarding
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 0
# Controls source route verification
net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1
# Do not accept source routing
net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0
# Controls the System Request debugging functionality of the kernel
kernel.sysrq = 0
# Controls whether core dumps will append the PID to the core filename
# Useful for debugging multi-threaded applications
kernel.core_uses_pid = 1
# Controls the use of TCP syncookies
net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 1
# Controls the maximum size of a message, in bytes
kernel.msgmnb = 65536
# Controls the default maxmimum size of a mesage queue
kernel.msgmax = 65536
# Controls the maximum shared segment size, in bytes
kernel.shmmax = 68719476736
# Controls the maximum number of shared memory segments, in pages
#kernel.shmall = 4294967296
kernel.shmall = 8250344
# Oracle kernel parameters
fs.aio-max-nr = 1048576
fs.file-max = 6815744
kernel.shmmni = 4096
kernel.sem = 250 32000 100 128
kernel.shmmax = 536870912
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 9000 65500
net.core.rmem_default = 262144
net.core.rmem_max = 4194304
net.core.wmem_default = 262144
net.core.wmem_max = 1048586
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 262144 262144 262144
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4194304 4194304 4194304
Please can I know how to resolve this error.CAUSE: User specified one or more of { db_cache_size , db_recycle_cache_size, db_keep_cache_size, db_nk_cache_size (where n is one of 2,4,8,16,32) } AND use_indirect_data_buffers is set to TRUE. This is illegal.
ACTION: Very Large Memory can only be enabled with the old (pre-Oracle_8.2) parameters
Maybe you are looking for
-
Images not getting displayed!...Urgent
Hi, While developing code on my local machine, update, delete, etc images are not getting displayed. I am having problem while testing code on my machine. But the same code when i am deploying on the server works fine. How do i resolve this. Thanks i
-
How do I use the App store with macbook pro and mac pro
I currently use the app store with the mac book, but want to buy (share?) apps and music with the mac pro. I can't find anything that specifically outlines how this works. I use SplashID with the macbook and an iPhone, and want to use it (and sync it
-
# Question We like to play games with Spigo. But the games do'nt come totaly on the PC. I think they are 75 %. Can you help us? [email protected]
-
hi,
-
Caller I'd shows different number
I renewed my number for the 3rd time and after the most recent renewal it shows up as a completely different number on caller ID by my info says it's the same number. No one will answer my calls because of this. What is going on?