Table for account types

Hi ,
What is the table for Account types and Texts for account types.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
The tables for account types is T071
Regards.
Jeetendra.
Edited by: JEETENDRA CHOUDHARY on Jul 21, 2008 12:12 PM

Similar Messages

Cross Company MIRO Transaction - BSEG-TXGRP Not Valued for Account Type "S"

I am working with the ABAP group to create tax reports for audits and sales tax charged by vendor. I am basically wanting a line item report of all purchases along with any tax applied to each line. Therefore, I am, for the most part, using tables BKPF, BSEG, and BSET. For our US transactions, we have one company paying the invoice on behalf of all other US companies. Essentially, every transaction is a cross-company transaction. The problem is I am having a hard time tying BSEG to BSET by line item. For FB60 transactions, I can tie BSEG-TXGRP to BSET-TXGRP; however, for MIRO transactions, BSEG-TXGRP is not valued for Account Type "S" (GL Accounts). Any ideas? I could not find a note to capture this issue. There was a note, but it was with regard to Account Types "D" and "K" I believe, vendor and customer accounts.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Deanna

So,
Did you ever resolve this. I have the EXACT problem right now. Inter-co. MIRO documents only getting TAXGRP popuplated for Original Co. Document (not cross-co. document).
Thanks,
- Tim

Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999

Hi friends
I am in SD. I am trying to create stock for newly created material, movement type 561. system give error Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999.
I use the T. Code OB52, i am confuse which combination i.e. variant, A, from Account, To Account, from per. 1 Year, To period, Year, from per. 2 year, To Period, Year, I should choose, can some one send me detail reply and solution which may display after this t. code OB52. I also have questin which movement type i should use.
Using T.Code MMPV, i have created new period (from company code 1000, To Company code 1000, period 01, Fiscal Year 1020.
I was reading previous solution, one of them was i should close period 2009. I tried to do this using using MMPV, i entered fiscal year 2009. Error display The specified year 2009 is not the current calender year.
Thanks
Raj

Hi
Hope you are doing this in test server
If this is a real time issue this needs to be addressed by a FI consultant
First see for your company code what is the posting period varient maintained in OBY6
Say if it is 1000
Then in OB52
Maintain a setting like this
1000-S-BLANK-ZZZZZZZZZZ-1--2010122010-13--201016--2010
Then save it
This is for Account type S that is GL accounts
Preferably maintain the same for A, + , D, K, M, V
Regards
Raja

While doing MIGO system giving error massage "No account was specified for account type "D" in item "0000000001"

Hello,
While doing MIGO system showing error " No account was specified for account type "D" in item "0000000001"
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi,
Your issue seems to be an issue in FI. Refer the similar thread: MIGO error for UNBW material and the note: 1027645 - Message F5670: Account not specified in item X
Found a similar issue in J1IS as explained in the KBA: 1932095 - Error : F5670 - ' No account is specified in item 0000000002 ' - in transaction J1IS
Regards,
AKPT

Postings for account type M ( posting key 99 ) are not defined

Hi,
I am trying to post vendor credit memo KG through FB01 using posting key 21 - Debit Vendor and posting key 99 - Credit Material.
I am getting the error "Postings for account type M ( posting key 99 ) are not defined Message F5204".
The posting key 99 is set for account type material. Is there anything else that need to be configured?
Is there any other way that i can debit a vendor and credit material through FI postings (without purchase order)
Thanks
Sukumar

Hi Ravi,
I am also having the same issue.
I want to load some costs to materials thorugh Finance module. In that case i am trying to post the values through F-43 document.
In posting key 89, but system not accepted. As per your suggestion i am trying to take 81 posting key. Then system is asking the GL, there is i select the Stock GL, system won't allow to post the values to the stock account.
So what will be the solution to add or to deduct any other charges to the material cost through finance module.

Create condition table for account determination

I would like to create a condition table which contains customer number as the key. However, I can only find the follow fields in field catalog.
Acct Key
AcctAsgnmt
AcctAssgGr
Cond. Type
Distr. Chl
Division
Ord. reason
Plant
Sales org.
Tax Code
Vendor
Is it possible to extend the field catalog? I have tried to added fields in KOMG according to note 21040, but it seems not work.

Hi
some additional information:
please check the documentation under customizing path:
IMG -> Sales and Distribution -> System Modifications ->
Create New Fields (Using Condition Technique) ->
New Fields For Account Determination
click on the icon
Notice that the userexits USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMKCV and
USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMPCV are useful only for revenue
account determination.
For reconciliation account determination you should use the userexit
EXIT_SAPLV60B_011 (enhancement SDVFX011) to fill the custom field.
The System modification documentation exaplins to add the new field
in the structure include KOMKCZ of KOMPCZ.
Notice that KOMKCZ is included in KOMKCV and KOMCV; KOMPCZ is included
in KOMPCV and KOMCV.
regards,
Ramana

Vendor payment doc type KZ looking for account type A which is not defined

Hi Experts
We are processing a Vendor payment where discount is received, howeve, the message "For document type KZ, account type A is not defined' in the job log.
Can anyone please put some light on this error.
Many thanks
Kind regards
Dawn

Hi,
T-code OBA7: there it is defined which doc. type is allowed to use which acount types.
SAP standard for KZ is to use vendor + GL account types.
So check your document that you are going tro post or, if you think its ok, post the same document in a test client and enable doc. type KZ in OBA7 to be used with asset account types to view the result of your posting.
Best regards, Christian

Wrong condition table for condition type

Hi,
I have a big problem during pricing. while creating the sales order the system takes the wrong condition table for the specified condition type (I have created a new condition table and changed the access seq, did the initial load and in customizing everything looks fine). To picture the customing i have created ZXXX access seq with a 901 cindition table (sales org, dist ch. and product hierarchy 2 with a standard field PRODH2) unfortunately I had to change the field to ZPRODH2 I decided to create a new table 902 with the Z field. The new access seq has now 902 table in customizing. In CRM the two condition tables and view exists for 901 and 902. Acording to customizing the system should take the 902 condition table but insteed he takes the old 901 which shouldn't be used.
Do anybody has some ideas why the system responds like that ? I have tried to delete the old table with the standard report and it didn't worked.
What can I do ?
Thanks for some ideas !!
BR
Tomasz

Hi Tomasz
Please check assignment of that new access seq to c.type in v/06
That table might hv used somewhere in another acc.seq so unable to delelte
Regards
Sachin

NESTED Tables for Sub-types when creating table for Super-type

If I create the following types, as an example:
Person with subtypes: Employee and Customer
Appointment
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Person_OT AS OBJECT (
person#                         NUMBER,
personSurname                    VARCHAR2(50),
personForenames               VARCHAR2(50),
personDateOfBirth               DATE,
personAddress                    Address_OT,
) NOT FINAL ;
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Employee UNDER Person_OT (
empSalary               NUMBER,
empNoSales          NUMBER,
makes               Appointment_List_OT
) FINAL ;
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Appointment_OT AS OBJECT (
some attributes
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Appointment_List_OT AS TABLE OF REF Appointment_OT ;
When creating the table to hold objects of Person type, how can the requisite nested table for representing 'makes' be declared? The below approach is not correct, however the table will not compile without naming the nested tables.
CREATE TABLE Person_TBL OF Person_OT (
Person#     PRIMARY KEY)
NESTED TABLE makes STORE AS Appointment_List_NTBL;
Advice very much appreciated!

CREATE TABLE Person_TBL OF Person_OT(
Person# PRIMARY KEY)
NESTED TABLE TREAT(SYS_NC_ROWINFO$ AS EMPLOYEE).MAKES STORE AS Appointment_List_NTBL
Table created.
SQL> select * from user_nested_tables
2 /
TABLE_NAME                     TABLE_TYPE_OWNER
TABLE_TYPE_NAME                PARENT_TABLE_NAME
PARENT_TABLE_COLUMN
STORAGE_SPEC                   RETURN_TYPE          ELEMENT_SUBSTITUTABLE
APPOINTMENT_LIST_NTBL          SCOTT
APPOINTMENT_LIST_OT            PERSON_TBL
TREAT(SYS_NC_ROWINFO$ AS "SCOTT"."EMPLOYEE")."MAKES"
                       DEFAULT                VALUE                         N
SQL> SY.

Table for accounts receivable

Hi experts,
Which table stores accounts receivable and accounts payable data mainly?
prasad

Dear,
It all depends upon what kind of data you look at, because if you want to know the data pertains to masters or transactions for account receivable and accounts payable.
Master data tables:
Vendor Master : LFA1, LFB1, LFBK, LFBW,ADRC, LFC1 etc
Customer Master : KNA1, KNB1, KNBK, KNC1etc.
Transaction data:
Customer
BSID - Customer Open Items
BSAD- Customer cleared items.
Vendor
BSIK - Vendor Open Items
BSAK- Vendor cleared items.

Maintaining different values for Accounting Type (KOART)

Hi experts,
I have several accounting tcodes such as FBV0, FB03, FB08, FV65,FV60 in one parent role.
FV60, FV65 are added to this role as FBV0 is checking internally for this authorization object.
All these tcodes share a same object F_BKPF_KOA which differ by activity and the accounting type (KOART).
The KOART field is an org level field defined by SAP and I have entered D,K,S as values.
But the auth object values should be different for the accounting types.
i.e 03 for D,K,S
01,02,03,77 for S
03,77 for K
All the derived/child roles for this parent should also have the same document type as the parent. How can I achieve this as this object is maintained at the org level.
I could not delete this obj from being an org level element as it is defined by SAP.
Appreciate your response.
Thanks
Kee

> If KOART is an org field you cannot differentiate between authorized activities for each of the KOART values in one role. Whether you maintain values in the parent or not only matters if you're planning to assign the parent roles to users or if you just use them as templates.
>
Parent Roles should not be assigned to any users. It should only be used as Template to grant and control Non-Organization Level authorizations centrally (you can see these option in Parent roles). Concept of Parent-Child role is to avoid creating same roles where all authorization field values are exactly same and differs only for Organization Values (different Site / Branch Office specific constants). So we can maintain the Org. levels as different sets for a single Parent role as I already explained.
For more details: Note#314513 - PFCG: Maintaining individual organizational levels
Note#532695 - PFCG: Incorrect organizational level values in derived roles
>
> Please elaborate on this one. I think we're running into an urban myth here....
>
> Organizational levels are only instruments to assist in building roles. For the final profile it does not matter whether a field is organizational or not. It will not influence the behaviour of the authority-check.
For the final profile it matters during loading of User authorization data to User Buffer. Think about the Parameter values stored for a particular user. How it behaves for all Objects containing a particular Auth. Field and providing default assignment for that user whenever he tries to perform any action where this field is required to populate.
If we delete any Object from SU24 proposal then it doesn't mean that the check will not be carried out or the Org. Field contained in that object will not be populated with it's values. I tried to make this clear to the requester.
Regards,
Dipanjan
Edited by: Dipanjan Sanpui on Jun 8, 2009 7:49 AM

Table for document type Number Range interval

Hi,
I want to know the number range interval for document type in the production system but I do not have authorisation for SPRO in the prd system.
Kindly let me know the table name to check this number range interval for the document type.
Table T003 stores only the number range and not the interval.
Thanks
Suresh

Hi,
The table which has document types is T003 but the number ranges are stored in a Structure IRDP. The number ranges are maintained directly in the production system.
regards,
radhika
Edited by: kolipara radhika on Aug 25, 2008 6:01 AM

Condition table for account determination

Hi,
I would like to know if there is any generic transaction to create condition tables.
Specifically, I would like to create a condition table for revenue account determination.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Aroop

Aroop,
Yes you can create IMG --> SD --> BF --> Revenue Account determination --> Define dependencies of revenue account determination --> Account determination create Tables OR Tcode V/12.
Try to create Table above 500 number.
Regards
Sathya

AQ table for complex type creation

I have a type containing nested tables, it looks like that:
create or replace type aq_student_reg_queue_type as object (
XML_ID varchar2(16),
trigger_name varchar2(32),
tm_transaction_id varchar2(30),
tm_transaction_type varchar2(30),
person aq_person_tm_type,
resources aq_community_resource_list);
aq_community_resource_list is table of aq_community_resource
aq_community_resource is another type containing table of resources
When I'm trying to create queue table for such payload I have an error that I have to specify nested table column or attribute. How to do that ? I can't find it somehow.

The problem is that you need to specify a storage clause for nested tables when you use a nested table inside a database table. When creating a queue, a table is created under the hood, which lacks a storage clause for the nested table. I don't know a way to provide this clause to AQ. A workaround is to use varrays instead. See this example:
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_tm_type as object(
2 resource_code varchar2(30)
3 );
4 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_tm_list as table of aq_community_tm_type;
2 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_resource as object(
2 subscriber varchar2(30),
3 resource_list aq_community_tm_list
4 );
5 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_resource_list as table of aq_community_resource;
2 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_person_tm_type as object (
2 PERSON_LDAP varchar2(30),
3 FIRST_NAME varchar2(30),
4 MIDDLE_NAME varchar2(30),
5 SURNAME varchar2(30),
6 GENDER varchar2(1),
7 TITLE varchar2(16),
8 DATE_OF_BIRTH date,
9 PREFERRED_EMAIL varchar2(100),
10 PREFERRED_PHONE varchar2(20),
11 ORIGINATING_GROUP varchar2(50),
12 SUB_GROUP varchar2(2000),
13 LMS_DOMAIN_ID integer,
14 LMS_ROLE_ID integer,
15 COURSE_CODE varchar2(16),
16 COURSE_INSTANCE_CODE varchar2(16),
17 COURSE_INSTANCE_DATE date,
18 REGISTRATION_DATE date,
19 REF_OBJECT_ID number
20 );
21 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_person_queue_tm_type as object (
2 XML_ID varchar2(16),
3 trigger_name varchar2(32),
4 tm_transaction_id varchar2(30),
5 tm_transaction_type varchar2(30),
6 person aq_person_tm_type,
7 resources aq_community_resource_list
8 );
9 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> begin
2    dbms_aqadm.create_queue_table
3    ( queue_table        => 'my_queue_table'
4    , queue_payload_type => 'aq_person_queue_tm_type'
5    );
6 end;
7 /
begin
FOUT in regel 1:
.ORA-22913: must specify table name for nested table column or attribute
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AQADM_SYS", line 2830
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AQADM", line 58
ORA-06512: at line 2This probably is the error you are experiencing (hint: next time please provide it with your question).
When you use varrays, it will work:
SQL> drop type aq_person_queue_tm_type
2 /
Type is verwijderd.
SQL> drop type aq_person_tm_type
2 /
Type is verwijderd.
SQL> drop type aq_community_resource_list
2 /
Type is verwijderd.
SQL> drop type aq_community_resource
2 /
Type is verwijderd.
SQL> drop type aq_community_tm_list
2 /
Type is verwijderd.
SQL> drop type aq_community_tm_type
2 /
Type is verwijderd.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_tm_type as object(
2 resource_code varchar2(30)
3 );
4 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_tm_list as varray(100) of aq_community_tm_type;
2 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_resource as object(
2 subscriber varchar2(30),
3 resource_list aq_community_tm_list
4 );
5 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_community_resource_list as varray(10) of aq_community_resource;
2 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_person_tm_type as object (
2 PERSON_LDAP varchar2(30),
3 FIRST_NAME varchar2(30),
4 MIDDLE_NAME varchar2(30),
5 SURNAME varchar2(30),
6 GENDER varchar2(1),
7 TITLE varchar2(16),
8 DATE_OF_BIRTH date,
9 PREFERRED_EMAIL varchar2(100),
10 PREFERRED_PHONE varchar2(20),
11 ORIGINATING_GROUP varchar2(50),
12 SUB_GROUP varchar2(2000),
13 LMS_DOMAIN_ID integer,
14 LMS_ROLE_ID integer,
15 COURSE_CODE varchar2(16),
16 COURSE_INSTANCE_CODE varchar2(16),
17 COURSE_INSTANCE_DATE date,
18 REGISTRATION_DATE date,
19 REF_OBJECT_ID number
20 );
21 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace type aq_person_queue_tm_type as object (
2 XML_ID varchar2(16),
3 trigger_name varchar2(32),
4 tm_transaction_id varchar2(30),
5 tm_transaction_type varchar2(30),
6 person aq_person_tm_type,
7 resources aq_community_resource_list
8 );
9 /
Type is aangemaakt.
SQL> begin
2    dbms_aqadm.create_queue_table
3    ( queue_table        => 'my_queue_table'
4    , queue_payload_type => 'aq_person_queue_tm_type'
5    );
6 end;
7 /
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> begin
2    dbms_aqadm.drop_queue_table('my_queue_table');
3 end;
4 /
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.Hope this helps.
Regards,
Rob.

Table for Accounting Document of Invoice Document

Dear All,
We have accounting doc. table of material document as BKPF(HEADER) & BSEG(ITEM).
In the same way, can any one share, whats the accounting doc table for Invoice/MIRO??
Regards
Mahesh
Re

Hi Dear
actually what table you have mentioned in your thread that table is for Accounting document, it doesn't matter whether the accounting document is created during good receipt or Invoice receipt
hence BKPF and BSEG is accounting table for invoice as well
Thanks

Table for account types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for