Cross Company MIRO Transaction - BSEG-TXGRP Not Valued for Account Type "S"

I am working with the ABAP group to create tax reports for audits and sales tax charged by vendor.  I am basically wanting a line item report of all purchases along with any tax applied to each line.  Therefore, I am, for the most part, using tables BKPF, BSEG, and BSET.  For our US transactions, we have one company paying the invoice on behalf of all other US companies.  Essentially, every transaction is a cross-company transaction.  The problem is I am having a hard time tying BSEG to BSET by line item.  For FB60 transactions, I can tie BSEG-TXGRP to BSET-TXGRP; however, for MIRO transactions, BSEG-TXGRP is not valued for Account Type "S" (GL Accounts).  Any ideas?  I could not find a note to capture this issue.  There was a note, but it was with regard to Account Types "D" and "K" I believe, vendor and customer accounts.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Deanna

So,
Did you ever resolve this.  I have the EXACT problem right now.   Inter-co. MIRO documents only getting TAXGRP popuplated for Original Co. Document (not cross-co. document).
Thanks,
- Tim

Similar Messages

  • Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999

    Hi friends
    I am in SD. I am trying to create stock for newly created material, movement type 561. system give error Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999.
    I use the T. Code OB52, i am confuse which combination i.e. variant, A, from Account, To Account, from per. 1 Year, To period, Year, from per. 2 year, To Period, Year, I should choose, can some one send me detail reply and solution which may display after this t. code OB52. I also have questin which movement type i should use.
    Using T.Code MMPV, i have created new period (from company code 1000, To Company code 1000, period 01, Fiscal Year 1020.
    I was reading previous solution, one of them was i should close period 2009. I tried to do this using using MMPV, i entered fiscal year 2009. Error display  The specified year 2009 is not the current calender year.
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi
    Hope you are doing this in test server
    If this is a real time issue this needs to be addressed by a FI consultant
    First see for your company code what is the posting period varient maintained in OBY6
    Say if it is 1000
    Then in OB52
    Maintain a setting like this
    1000-S-BLANK-ZZZZZZZZZZ-1--2010122010-13--201016--2010
    Then save it
    This is for Account type S that is GL accounts
    Preferably maintain the same for      A,   + ,   D,   K,   M,   V
    Regards
    Raja

  • Maintaining different values for Accounting Type (KOART)

    Hi experts,
    I have several accounting tcodes such as FBV0, FB03, FB08, FV65,FV60 in one parent role.
    FV60, FV65 are added to this role as FBV0 is checking internally for this authorization object. 
    All these tcodes share a same object  F_BKPF_KOA which differ by activity and the accounting type (KOART).
    The KOART field is an org level field defined by SAP and I have entered D,K,S as values.
    But the auth object values should be different for the accounting types.
    i.e  03 for D,K,S
         01,02,03,77  for S
         03,77 for K
    All the derived/child roles for this parent should also have the same document type as the parent. How can I achieve this as this object is maintained at the org level.
    I could not delete this obj from being an org level element as it is defined by SAP.
    Appreciate your response.
    Thanks
    Kee

    > If KOART is an org field you cannot differentiate between authorized activities for each of the KOART values in one role. Whether you maintain values in the parent or not only matters if you're planning to assign the parent roles to users or if you just use them as templates.
    >
    Parent Roles should not be assigned to any users. It should only be used as Template to grant and control Non-Organization Level authorizations centrally (you can see these option in Parent roles). Concept of Parent-Child role is to avoid creating same roles where all authorization field values are exactly same and differs only for Organization Values (different Site / Branch Office specific constants). So we can maintain the Org. levels as different sets for a single Parent role as I already explained.
    For more details:  Note#314513 - PFCG: Maintaining individual organizational levels
    Note#532695 - PFCG: Incorrect organizational level values in derived roles
    >
    > Please elaborate on this one. I think we're running into an urban myth here....
    >
    > Organizational levels are only instruments to assist in building roles. For the final profile it does not matter whether a field is organizational or not. It will not influence the behaviour of the authority-check.
    For the final profile it matters during loading of User authorization data to User Buffer. Think about the Parameter values stored for a particular user. How it behaves for all Objects containing a particular Auth. Field and providing default assignment for that user whenever he tries to perform any action where this field is required to populate.
    If we delete any Object from SU24 proposal then it doesn't mean that the check will not be carried out or the Org. Field contained in that object will not be populated with it's values. I tried to make this clear to the requester.
    Regards,
    Dipanjan
    Edited by: Dipanjan Sanpui on Jun 8, 2009 7:49 AM

  • Period 002/2009 is not open for account type S and G/L 399999

    I am getting this error while doing GR with 561 movment type, how to overcome this?
    Thank You.

    You need to ask for a FI consultant to open this period for you...

  • Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

    Dear Friends,
    In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
    eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
    I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
    In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
    In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
    But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
    Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
    Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
    Regards
    Shammi

  • Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

    Hello Guys,
    I have a  problem related to cross company code transaction.
    In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
    Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
    But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks
    Rafael B.

    Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
    The document was created in 2010.
    This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
    More suggestions?
    Regards.
    Rafael

  • Cross Company code Transaction error

    Hi,
    When I am posting below Cross company code transaction getting error - Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled.
    Vendor A/c - Company code1
    To Bank clearing A/c - Company code2
    Problem is profit center is not deriving for Vendor reconciliation A/c. We cannot make a default profit center this.
    When I am posting cross company code invoice it is correclty deriving the profit center for the same reconciliation a/c.
    Also I do not see any mistake in document splitting configuration.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Regards
    Shanu

    Hi
    Check the following things:
    1. In KE52, the profit center entered in Bank Clearing Account Item in Co Code B is also assigned in Co Code A. Then system will allow you to post the cross co code document
    2. Are you using the correct Document Type while posting the transaction. IN your Document Type Definition in OBA7, the check boxes for Inter Co posting and Trading Partner (Trading Partner only if inter co elimination is being used) have been ticked
    3. You have assigned the correct item category to vendor reconcilliation account (Should be Vendor GL), Inter co Clearing account (Balance sheet Account ) and Bank Clearing account (balance sheet) have been assigned in your configuration
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    <a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">sai baba wallpaper</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>

  • Cross company code transaction in cash journal

    Hi,
    Is it possible to do cross company code transactions in cash  journal ?
    Eg:
    i want to make a  payment ,from cash journal of cocd 1000  to  cocd5000.
    i should book the payment  only thro cash journal .
    Regards
    Guru

    Hi Guys,
    No cross company code transactions can be made thru CJ. Reason being, CJ is created under a company  code & generally related to a specific BA and handles petty cash. But u r not using BA.
    So we cannot post corss company code transactions in CJ
    Regards,
    Ajay

  • Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
    In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
    While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
    Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
    Message no. F5786
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
    System Response
    You cannot enter this kind of document.
    Procedure
    Enter the transaction in two documents.
    For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
    The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
    Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
    JBC.

    Hi Mamta,
    Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
    For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
    I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
    Posting        GL                   Co Code
    Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
    Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
    For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
    I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
    Thanks,
    Bapu

  • Transfer posting of tax in a cross company code transaction

    Has anyone used the program RFBUST10, that transfer postings of tax in cross company code transactions?  If so , can you give some detail in how to populate the table TBUVTX in config?  There is not much documentation on this  -
    Thanks Pavi

    Adi  -
    That works as you say -
    I have also awarded points as you have been extremely helpful and i very much appreciate your input.
    We use i/c customers and vendors for our obya i/c auto post and that looks to be an issue here with the program generated postings for the tax items.   
    I have some additional VAT related questions- would you be willing to consult further with me briefly? I have a couple of questions around processes that you have seen used in the EU.  For example - if we use cust/vendors in our obya config and that prevents us from using rfbust to shift taxes between co codes (?), have you seen companies just use rfbust to calculate the amounts and then make some type of month end journal entry upload ? 
    Thanks ,Pavi

  • Sales invoice hitting cross company code transaction

    Hi,
    Material and customer maintaining in the same company code and sales order raised accordingly.
    but when we are trying to post delivery it is generating cross company code transactions.
    what are the possible reasons.
    sairavi

    Ya right , but when i am trying to post the enteries ,  the clearing item is having different profit center ( i.e which i have assigned in the t.code FAGL3KEH ), but  the vendor line item is still taking the dummy profit center.
    Vendor line item should actually take the profit center from the clearing line item ... but it it not taking ..
    Edited by: muscan S on Mar 3, 2010 6:48 AM

  • Derive profit center in cross company code transaction into clearing items

    Dears,
    I have one condition where I want to copy profit center from first line item to second line item in a cross company code transaction for example.
    I have two company codes XX10 and XX20
    two profit centers XX50 for company code XX10 and XX60 for company code XX20
    I am creating cross company code transaction. Now I want when giving XX50 for company code XX10 so upon creating cross company line items this profit center given in first line be copied automatically in the cross company code line item accordingly.
    example:
    Dr company code XX10 with profit center XX50
    Cr company code XX20 with profit center XX60
    Required:
    These profit centers be copied automatically in the cross company line items automatically. I am using same controlling area as the company code not cross company codes.

    Ya right , but when i am trying to post the enteries ,  the clearing item is having different profit center ( i.e which i have assigned in the t.code FAGL3KEH ), but  the vendor line item is still taking the dummy profit center.
    Vendor line item should actually take the profit center from the clearing line item ... but it it not taking ..
    Edited by: muscan S on Mar 3, 2010 6:48 AM

  • Report painter,cross company code transactions

    Hi Masters,
    1,  Please send material of  REPORT PAINTER ?
    2,  Please  Send material of CROSS COMPANY CODE TRANSACTIONS
    3.  Please send material of  FUNCTIONAL SPECTS
    my  mail id [email protected]
      Thank you friends

    Hi,
    Hi,
    Cross-Company-Code Configurations
    Step1: T Code: OBYA
    We have to maintain Receiver Company Code as Customer in Sender Company Code and Sender Company Code as Vendor in Receiver Company Code. Then problem will be solved.
    Step2: T Code: OB60
    There you can find 4 line items, Copy all the 4 Line Items using Copy As button and customize to your company code.
    Cross-Company-Code Transactions
    1. To Change Cross Company Code Document: T Code: FBU2 - Change
    2. To Display Cross Company Code Document: T Code: FBU3 - Display
    3. To Reverse Cross Company Code Document: T Code: FBU8 - Reverse
    regards,
    Santosh kumar

  • Cross company code transactions

    All gurus,, I have one problem in Cross company code transactions:
    Ex: I have Company code A and B,,, where A pays on behalf of B. how to configure and what is process to follow in APP for making payment to vendor of B...
    A pays to vendor of B... how it happens in APP.
    Santosh.

    Hi,
    Hi,
    Cross-Company-Code Configurations
    Step1: T Code: OBYA
    We have to maintain Receiver Company Code as Customer in Sender Company Code and Sender Company Code as Vendor in Receiver Company Code. Then problem will be solved.
    Step2: T Code: OB60
    There you can find 4 line items, Copy all the 4 Line Items using Copy As button and customize to your company code.
    Cross-Company-Code Transactions
    1. To Change Cross Company Code Document: T Code: FBU2 - Change
    2. To Display Cross Company Code Document: T Code: FBU3 - Display
    3. To Reverse Cross Company Code Document: T Code: FBU8 - Reverse
    regards,
    Santosh kumar

  • FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)

    Hi expert,
    I am going to reverse a document (after resetting through LSMW,useing -F.80 as for mass reversal) and getting a error massage below(this document has been generated after F110)
    FU 065:-Document belongs to cross company- code transaction(error massage)
    Please advise me how can I reverse this document and also advise me what does it mean,
    Will it be done by FBU8? (But when I am using it,showing two documents what does it mean and advise should I select both document for reversal)
    Please advise
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi
    Thanks for your quick advise,
    I am trying to do that through FBU8 but I am getting there two documents numbere inside for reversal (it contained two documents)
    Should I reverse both documents or I should select one one only
    Please advise why it is showing two documents inside
    Thanks & Regards

Maybe you are looking for