Table row with more than 1 UI elements

Hello Experts,
I want to include more than 1 UI element(say an input field and a button) in table row of a column.
More like having a column with merged UI elements in all the rows of the table.
Thanks in advance !!!
Best Regards,
Srini

hi ,
Check the standerd application
SALV_WD_TEST_TABLE_EVENTS
You can get the idea.
And Refewr this link
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c70444a-0801-0010-7688-9e4bd844b783
Regards
Vivekananthan.S

Similar Messages

Table cell with more than one component

how can i make table cell with more than one component
like below, cell in column 3 contains few button
col0 | col1 | col2 |
a | b |[btn1] [btn2] [btn3]|
a | b |[btn1] [btn2] |
and when i click on the any of the button a dialog box pop up saying something..

Here's link to someone who did a lot with tables. Not sure about multiple buttons, but it should get you started.
http://www2.gol.com/users/tame/swing/examples/SwingExamples.html

SQL to convert rows with more than one columns to columns

Hi All,
I have a typical question here. As must have been in most of the recent databases, the attributes of a master table are put in a child table. So an SQL query will return multiple rows with each row having each attribute.
Eg: Object OBJ has 5 attributes - A, B, C, D, E. The tables would be
TABLE OBJ
======
OBJ_ID (PK) (Say ID1)
OBJ_COL1
OBJ_COL2
TABLE OBJ_CHILD
========
OBJ_CHILD_ID (PK)
OBJ_ID(FK)
ATTRIBUTE (The data will be A,B,C,D,E for each OBJ_ID)
ATTRIBUTE_VALUE (Value for each attribute. say 1,2,3,4,5)
Query : SELECT OBJ_ID, ATTRIBUTE, ATTRIBUTE_VALUE FROM OBJ < OBJ_CHILD where OBJ.OBJ_ID = OBJ_CHILD.OBJ_ID
This will return 5 rows as :
OBJ ATTRIBUTE ATTRIBUTE_VALUE
=== ======== =============
ID1 A 1
ID1 B 2
ID1 C 3
ID1 D 4
ID1 E 5
I need to return rows as follows:
ID1 A 1 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 5
Is this thing possible in SQL? Even with a function ? (Its a transpose but with two columns in every row)
Thanks,
Midhun.
P.S. I am on Oracle 10g.

Hi
user8830587 wrote:
... I need to return rows as follows:
ID1 A 1 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 5How many columns is that?
If it's 11 or 12 separate columns, then look for Pivot .
If it's 2 or 3 columns (where the last one is all the data from obj_child concatenated together), then look for String Aggregation .
Either can be done with any number of columns.
If you have a choice, you'll probably want to do string aggregation rather than pivot.
If you'd like help, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) for both tables.
Also post the results you want from that data, clearly formatted to show the columns. When you post formatted text on this site, type these 6 characters:
\(all small letters, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on May 14, 2010 6:26 AM

Need to create Table Maintenance with more than 400 characters

I need to create table maintenance in which one filed have more than 400 characters. CHAR type support between 1-255 & STRING type not supported by Table Maintenance. Is there any alternative type or solution for that?

Hi,
If you assign TMG to the table, it will throw error as unable to display the field on screen. why because it can able to display upto 255 char length only.
For this requirement you have 2 solutions :
1) Create multiple fields and your Z table, split the data and store them as required.
2) Create a TEXT ID and store it as a long text using FM CREATE_TEXT.
or
This type of text should be treated as Long Text.
And the steps are:
1. Create Text Object Using SE75.
2. Create Text ID Using SE75.
3. Now you have to Save the text with FM SAVE_TEXT.
For example:
The Most simple solution for it can be that Divide the field REMARKS of size 1000 in multiples of 200 characters like REMARK1, REMARK2....REMARKn.
Now you can create two FMs :
zset_data: To Store 1000 char long data in Table
Here you will divide the data of Variable (type char1024) in multiples of 200 and will store in REMARK1, REMARK2.....
zget_data: To Get 1000 char long data back from Table
Here you will concatenate REMARK1, REMARK2..... and will store in Variable of Type char1024.
This is the best solution if Table is not going to be maintained by Table Maintenance Generator.
regards,
ravi

Can we create a table field with more than 1200 char length

Hi,
As per business requirement, need to create new table - and one of the field should contain 1200 char length. i found the sap data element but when i was activating it was throwing an error.. is there any alternative for this.
Thanks in advance.

hi jayasri,
Can you use datatype as LCHR for the character string.
before creating the string you need to decalre one INTEGER field.
you can refer to the table EDID4 where SDATA field declared.
check for the data type EDI_SDATA.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Regards,
Madhavi

Problem veryfing document with more than one signature element ...

hello everyone,
Sorry for my english. I've got a short question (but interesting).
I know how to write simple application which correctly sign and verify xml document (dsig and xades).
When I sign the same xml document for a few times it looks like this:
<data>
<Signature 1 />
<Signature 2 />
<Signature 3 />
</data>
But only last signature element I can verify correctly. I use Transform.ENVELOPED, and haven't got any ideas what I do wrong. Maybe I have to remove all signature elements before sign next ? Maybe I have to remove other signature elements before verify right ?
Best regards, kk

Take a look at business area and groupings in they payment program settings...
I am not sure what version you are on but the following link for 4.7 should provide some valuable information...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9be64455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9be64455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Grouping Open Items and Individual Payments
Wherever possible, the payment program will always group items together for payment.
The payment program can only group together open items for payment if the open items in an account have the same:
1. Currency
2. Payment method in the item
3. Bank in the item
4. Contents of the grouping fields (if a grouping key is specified in the customer or vendor master record)
You can also pay open items from different company codes together, as well as customer and vendor line items.
Items in an account are not grouped together if you:
1. Make payments separately per business area. This procedure entails separate payments being created per business area.
2. Want to make individual payments
Items in which a payment method is specified are not grouped with items in which no payment method is specified.
You define the required grouping key in the IMG for Financial Accounting under Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payments -> Payment Method/Bank Selection for Payment Program -> Define Payment Groupings.
In our system, if the business area is the same, there will be one ZP document with one line with a posting key of 25. Otherwise there will be many individual 25 posting key lines with.

Row chaining in table with more than 255 columns

Hi,
I have a table with 1000 columns.
I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
rows (we break really wide tables up)."
If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
Thanks
dyahav

user10952094 wrote:
Hi,
I have a table with 1000 columns.
I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
rows (we break really wide tables up)."
If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
Thanks
dyahavYesterday, I stated this on the forum "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." My statement needs clarification. It was based on the following:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
"Oracle Database can only store 255 columns in a row piece. Thus, if you insert a row into a table that has 1000 columns, then the database creates 4 row pieces, typically chained over multiple blocks."
And this paraphrase from "Practical Oracle 8i":
V$SYSSTAT will show increasing values for CONTINUED ROW FETCH as table rows are read for tables containing more than 255 columns.
Related information may also be found here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96524/c11schem.htm
"When a table has more than 255 columns, rows that have data after the 255th column are likely to be chained within the same block. This is called intra-block chaining. A chained row's pieces are chained together using the rowids of the pieces. With intra-block chaining, users receive all the data in the same block. If the row fits in the block, users do not see an effect in I/O performance, because no extra I/O operation is required to retrieve the rest of the row."
http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B14340_01/data.htm
"For a table with several columns, the key question to consider is the (average) row length, not the number of columns. Having more than 255 columns in a table built with a smaller block size typically results in intrablock chaining.
Oracle stores multiple row pieces in the same block, but the overhead to maintain the column information is minimal as long as all row pieces fit in a single data block. If the rows don't fit in a single data block, you may consider using a larger database block size (or use multiple block sizes in the same database). "
Why not a test case?
Create a test table named T4 with 1000 columns.
With the table created, insert 1,000 rows into the table, populating the first 257 columns each with a random 3 byte string which should result in an average row length of about 771 bytes.
SPOOL C:\TESTME.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL2,
COL3,
COL255,
COL256,
COL257)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=1000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWhat are the results of the above?
Before the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 166
After the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 166
After the select:
NAME STATISTIC# VALUE
table fetch continue 252 332 Another test, this time with an average row length of about 12 bytes:
DELETE FROM T4;
COMMIT;
SPOOL C:\TESTME2.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL256,
COL257,
COL999)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=100000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWith 100,000 rows each containing about 12 bytes, what should the 'table fetch continued row' statistic show?
Before the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 332
After the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 332
After the select:
NAME STATISTIC# VALUE
table fetch continue 252 33695The final test only inserts data into the first 4 columns:
DELETE FROM T4;
COMMIT;
SPOOL C:\TESTME3.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL2,
COL3,
COL4)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=100000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWhat should the 'table fetch continued row' show?
Before the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 33695
After the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 33695
After the select:
NAME STATISTIC# VALUE
table fetch continue 252 33695 My statement "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." needs to be clarified:
"Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows +(row pieces)+ if a column beyond column 255 is used, but the 'table fetch continued row' statistic +may+ only increase in value if the remaining row pieces are found in a different block."
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.
Edited by: Charles Hooper on Aug 5, 2009 9:52 AM
Paraphrase misspelled the view name "V$SYSSTAT", corrected a couple minor typos, and changed "will" to "may" in the closing paragraph as this appears to be the behavior based on the test case.

Analyse a partitioned table with more than 50 million rows

Hi,
I have a partitioned table with more than 50 million rows. The last analyse is on 1/25/2007. Do I need to analyse him? (query runs on this table is very slow).
If I need to analyse him, what is the best way? Use DBMS_STATS and schedule a job?
Thanks

A partitioned table has global statistics as well as partition (and subpartition if the table is subpartitioned) statistics. My guess is that you mean to say that the last time that global statistics were gathered was in 2007. Is that guess accurate? Are the partition-level statistics more recent?
Do any of your queries actually use global statistics? Or would you expect that every query involving this table would specify one or more values for the partitioning key and thus force partition pruning to take place? If all your queries are doing partition pruning, global statistics are irrelevant, so it doesn't matter how old and out of date they are.
Are you seeing any performance problems that are potentially attributable to stale statistics on this table? If you're not seeing any performance problems, leaving the statistics well enough alone may be the most prudent course of action. Gathering statistics would only have the potential to change query plans. And since the cost of a query plan regressing is orders of magnitude greater than the benefit of a different query performing faster (at least for most queries in most systems), the balance of risks would argue for leaving the stats alone if there is no problem you're trying to solve.
If your system does actually use global statistics and there are performance problems that you believe are potentially attributable to stale global statistics and your partition level statistics are accurate, you can gather just global statistics on the table probably with a reasonably small sample size. Make sure, though, that you back up your existing statistics just in case a query plan goes south. Ideally, you'd also have a test environment with identical (or nearly identical) data volumes that you could use to verify that gathering statistics doesn't cause any problems.
Justin

General Scenario- Adding columns into a table with more than 100 million rows

I was asked/given a scenario, what issues do you encounter when you try to add new columns to a table with more than 200 million rows? How do you overcome those?
Thanks in advance.
svk

For such a large table, it is better to add the new column to the end of the table to avoid any performance impact, as RSingh suggested.
Also avoid to use any default on the newly created statement, or SQL Server will have to fill up 200 million fields with this default value. If you need one, add an empty column and update the column by using small batches (otherwise you lock up the whole
table). Add the default after all the rows have a value for the new column.

Error while running spatial queries on a table with more than one geometry.

Hello,
I'm using GeoServer with Oracle Spatial database, and this is a second time I run into some problems because we use tables with more than one geometry.
When GeoServer renders objects with more than one geometry on the map, it creates a query where it asks for objects which one of the two geometries interacts with the query window. This type of query always fails with "End of TNS data channel" error.
We are running Oracle Standard 11.1.0.7.0.
Here is a small script to demonstrate the error. Could anyone confirm that they also have this type of error? Or suggest a fix?
What this script does:
1. Create table object1 with two geometry columns, geom1, geom2.
2. Create metadata (projected coordinate system).
3. Insert a row.
4. Create spacial indices on both columns.
5. Run a SDO_RELATE query on one column. Everything is fine.
6. Run a SDO_RELATE query on both columns. ERROR: "End of TNS data channel"
7. Clean.
CREATE TABLE object1
id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
geom1 SDO_GEOMETRY,
geom2 SDO_GEOMETRY
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata (table_name, column_name, srid, diminfo)
VALUES
'OBJECT1',
'GEOM1',
2180,
SDO_DIM_ARRAY
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', 400000, 700000, 0.05),
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 300000, 600000, 0.05)
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata (table_name, column_name, srid, diminfo)
VALUES
'OBJECT1',
'GEOM2',
2180,
SDO_DIM_ARRAY
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', 400000, 700000, 0.05),
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 300000, 600000, 0.05)
INSERT INTO object1 VALUES(1, SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(550000, 450000, NULL), NULL, NULL));
CREATE INDEX object1_geom1_sidx ON object1(geom1) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
CREATE INDEX object1_geom2_sidx ON object1(geom2) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
SELECT *
FROM object1
WHERE
SDO_RELATE("GEOM1", SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE';
SELECT *
FROM object1
WHERE
SDO_RELATE("GEOM1", SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE' OR
SDO_RELATE("GEOM2", SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE';
DELETE FROM user_sdo_geom_metadata WHERE table_name = 'OBJECT1';
DROP INDEX object1_geom1_sidx;
DROP INDEX object1_geom2_sidx;
DROP TABLE object1;
Thanks for help.

This error appears in GeoServer and SQLPLUS.
I have set up a completly new database installation to test this error and everything works fine. I tried it again on the previous database but I still get the same error. I also tried to restart the database, but with no luck, the error is still there. I geuss something is wrong with the database installation.
Anyone knows what could cause an error like this "End of TNS data channel"?

Not able to create a table with more than 64 fields in dictionary

Hi,
I have created a java dictionary in Netweaver Developer studio. I have to create a table with more than 64 fields in it. I was able to create the table in dictionary, but when i tried to build it, I am getting an error message as "more than 64 fields are not allowed". If i create the table with 64 fields or below 64 fields, i can build the dictionary and deploy it.
That is, when i create a table with more than 64 fieds, I am not able to compile the dictionary, But if i reduce the fields to 64 or below, i can compile the dictionary.
Kindly help me to solve the problem.
Regards,
Sudheesh

Hi,
Sudheesh,as far as I am aware creating of fields in the table actually depends on the total width of table that can be used for various Vendors.
So I actually tried out creating a table with too many fields,and I am reproducing the errors which I have obtained -
Error Dictionary Generation: DB2:checkWidth TMP_1: total width of table (198198 bytes) greater than allowed maximum (32696 bytes) TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: DB4:Table TMP_1: fixed length: 198366 (32767). TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: DB6:checkWidth TMP_1: total width of table (297200) including row overhead is greater than the allowed maximum for 16K tablespaces . TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: MSSQL:checkWidth TMP_1: total width(198215) greater than allowed maximum (8060) TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: SAPDB:checkWidth TMP_1: total width(198297) greater than allowed maximum (8088) TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: Table TMP_1 is not generated TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages 
I hope you can understand what the errors state.I am trying to create a table whose total width(sum of width all columns) is greater than the maximum allowed for various Vendors,such as DB2,MSSQL,SAPDB etc.
I hope this answer helps you create your table suitably
Regards,
Harish
(Please award points if this answer has been usefull)

Tables with more than one cell with a high number of rowspan (ej. 619). This cell can not be print in a page and it must be cut. But I don't know how indesign can do this action.

Tables with more than one cell with a high number of rowspan (ej. 619). This cell can not be print in a page and it must be cut. But I don’t know how indesign can do this action.

set the wake-on lan on the main computer
The laptop's too far away from the router to be connected by ethernet. It's all wifi.
No separate server app on the laptop, it's all samba
The files are on a windows laptop and a hard drive hooked up to the windows laptop. The windows share server is pants, so I'd need some sort of third party server running. Maybe you weren't suggesting to use Samba to connect to the windows share though?
I'm glad that you've all understood my ramblings and taken and interest, thanks The way I see it, I can't be the only netbook user these days looking for this kind of convenience, and I certainly won't be once chrome and moblin hit the market.
Last edited by saft (2010-03-18 20:38:08)

Can we have more than 1 UI element in a single table column?

Hi All,
For example, I want to have IMAGE, ProgressIndicator and LinkToAction together as a template in a table column.
I already tried without success. I could only add single UI elements. After that, tools won't let me do it.
Any help or suggestion will be appreciated.
Sub

Hi
You can have at one time only one UI element in the table.
if you want to have more than one type of editors in the table then you can use table cell editors as suggested above.
but i guess you are referring here to grouping more than one UI element in one editor or one column.
i think that is not possible as such.
How ever what you can do is, make use of the TABLECOLUMNGROUP.
instead of adding column directly to the table use TABLECOLUMNGROUP and add columns to this.
create three table column for three UI elements you are reffering here and put them in this one TABLECOLUMNGROUP.
and add rest of the column straight to the table.
thanks
sarbjeet

Table with more than 35 columns

Hello All.
How can one work with a table with more than 35 columns
on JDev 9.0.3.3?
My other question is related to this.
Setting Entities's Beans properties from a Session Bean
bought up the error, but when setting from inside the EJB,
the bug stays clear.
Is this right?
Thank you

Thank you all for reply.
Here's my problem:
I have an AS400/DB2 Database, a huge and an old one.
There is many COBOL Programs used to communicate with this DB.
My project is to transfer the database with the same structure and the same contents to a Linux/ORACLE System.
I will not remake the COBOL Programs. I will use the existing one on the Linux System.
So the tables of the new DB should be the same as the old one.
That’s why I can not make a relational DB. I have to make an exact migration.
Unfortunately I have some tables with more than 5000 COLUMNS.
Now my question is:
can I modify the parameters of the ORACE DB to make it accept Tables and Views with more than 1000 columns, If not, is it possible to make a PL/SQL Function that simulate a table, this function will insert/update/select data from many other small tables (<1000 columns). I want to say a method that make the ORACLE DB acting like if it has a table with a huge number of columns;
I know it's crazy but any idea please.

Spatial index creation for table with more than one geometry columns?

I have table with more than one geometry columns.
I'v added in user_sdo_geom_metadata table record for every column in the table.
When I try to create spatial indexes over geometry columns in the table - i get error message:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 8
ORA-06512: at line 1
What is the the solution?

I'v got errors in my user_sdo_geom_metadata.
The problem does not exists!

Table row with more than 1 UI elements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for