TABS shared across Multiple apps?

Hi there,
I successfully implemented SSO to flick through several APEX applications without re-authenticating.
However, in order to mantain the navigation layout, I need to have a CORE application that holds common Navigation tabs and lists.
Is it possible to share tabs across applications? It is paradoxal that Tabs live under "Shared Components" however there is no Subscription feature for them.
Any hints?
Thanks

Is it possible to share tabs across applications?No. The Navigation Bar - Typical uses.
It is paradoxal that Tabs live under "Shared Components" however there is no Subscription feature for them.It's not that paradoxical as there are many other Shared Components that aren't included in the Subscription feature.
I'm definitely NOT a fan of APEX tabs: don't think navigation elements should submit, and the conceptual model and builder UI are incomprehensible. I'm therefore more into using lists, and would like them to be included in the Subscription feature.
A similar requirement is foreseen on a project I'm currently working on, and replacing the tabs with a PL/SQL region calling standard procedures across all the apps is one of the options under consideration. Other options might be to use a "region pull" from a master app, or some other AJAX approach...

Similar Messages

  • How do I configure my contacts to be shared across multiple emails?

    How do I configure my iPhone6 contacts to be shared across multiple emails accounts?

    By interface I simply mean connected to the contacts.  I have two different gmail accounts, one that uses the apple mail app and the new one that launches from the gmail icon that I downloaded from the app store.  The new one doesn't recognize the contacts.

  • How do you configure the DAM so it can be shared across multiple CQ instances?

    How do you configure the DAM so it can be shared across multiple CQ instances?

    You can use shared datastore http://dev.day.com/content/kb/home/Crx/CrxSystemAdministration/HowToCombineTheDatastoreToP reserveDiskSpace.html multiple CQ instance will use same file system to share asset
    clustering http://dev.day.com/docs/en/crx/current/administering/cluster.html multiple node will share repository.
    But you can not have something like one DAM and then have different CQ instance pointing to it (As not everything goes in to one location in file system)
    Yogesh

  • File sharing across multiple user accounts on the same machine

    Hello,
    I try to figure out how multiple users (my wife and I) on the same mac can have equal access to files on the local drive without granting that access to all users on that machine or even the rest of the world.
    My research sofar hasn't come up with a satisfying solution. Here are the solutions that I am looking at:
    1. Enable a permission system that ensures access to both users in all cases (file/directory creation, copy and move).
    I only found a suitable solution for creating and copying files/directories but not for moving them.
    See the following articles for reference:
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/20787617#20787617 Setting up a shared structure that works e.g. for iPhoto Library but not for moving files to and from
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/4005647#4005647 Helpful information on POSIX Permissions, ACL's an Permission inheritance
    This would be my first choice if I can get around the problem of moving files...
    2. Disk Image
    Create a disk image which ignores persmissions and set permissions for the file that contains the image instead.
    Read this article to get further details: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198
    This solution will work but has a few disadvatages:
    There's no mutual access from multiple user accounts since an image may only be mounted by one user at a time.
    One has to create a startup script that mounts the image upon login which would create a first come first serve for access to the image content.
    3. Using a file sharing protocol (e.g. afp or smb) locally.
    The idea behind it is to have a server providing the files mutually to multiple users one the same machine. At them moment this seems to be the most promising approach to me.
    Unfortunately I can get acces from another machine but not from the same machine. Has anyone ever tried to access the file sharing (afp or smb) from the same machine on which the server is located?
    Has anyone got some helpful hints for me?
    Thanks in advance.

    Sorry, but you didn't specify details, and it was worth checking whether or not you had overlooked this approach.
    The problem you're having (as I suppose you already know) is that any new disk item inherits the permissions of the folder it is originally created in in.  These permissions (sensibly enough) need owner or administrator permission to change once they've been established; that will happen when you copy a file to a new location (because that's essentially creating a new file) but not when you move it. any of the following would work:
    changing the permissions on newly created files for both users so that they all explicitly give r/w access to a particular group.
    writing a droplet that would change the permissions of files dropped on it and move them programmatically to the shared folder
    set up a folder action or launchd job that would watch the shared folder and automatically convert permissions on files placed in it.
    The last would be the approach I would take, but...  which appeals to you?

  • File sharing across multiple computers - is there an easier way?

    Have a small office that is getting bigger, so we purchased a new 20" iMac. Previously, we had an old iMac G4 and iBook G4. All three computers are part of the same LAN.
    In the past, we have shared files across the computers by first mounting a shared computer, then creating an alias to that share and copying the alias to the dock. This allowed us to just click an icon to have access to files on the other computer.
    As the office has gotten bigger and we have added a new computer, we need a more reliable solution. We need to be able to access common files (such as word documents and Excel spreadsheets) in a single location. For example, the iMac G4 has document templates that we are constantly changing, but we want to make changes only to a common copy.
    Can anyone make some suggestions?

    I know you can do this by exporting the common shared directory as an NFS share, and then configuring each client to transparently mount that share at a common point in the filesystem. For example, if you wanted to have a common set of fonts accessible to every client on your network, you could export /Library/Fonts on the server, and have every client mount it at ~/Library/Fonts. Applications running on the client access the fonts on the server, and don't know any differently.
    Unfortunately, its not a trivial thing to set up on either the server or the client. I could try to come up with a tutorial, but I haven't had time to get into it myself to really comprehend all of the possibilities with using NFS like that.

  • SFSB Instance Sharing across multiple servers/SFSB failover practices

    Hello:
    My question is in two parts. I have spent a great deal of time searching the forums without a satisfactory answer, so I thought I'd post my question directly.
    1) I have two clients that can potentially talk to two different servers, but they both need to interact with the same instance of a SFSB. For example, the first client calls the SFSB and causes it to save some state in its instance variables. The second client connects to a different server (because of a "network dispatcher" load-balancing architecture), but needs to use the same instance of the SFSB that the first client initialized. The two clients will not always talk to different servers, but the possibility exists that they might.
    2) What is the proper design pattern for "fail-over" for a SFSB. For example, a client establishes a session, tickles a SFSB and causes its instance variables to contain state, and then WHAMO the application server crashes or becomes unavailable for some reason. We have in place a mechanism to reroute further client request to a second application server, but currently it is a problem because even though the failover is transparent to the client, the backup server creates a new instance of the SFSB and therefore it has none of the previous state information.
    I'm thinking that the answer to one of these questions will be the answer to the other.
    A little bit of background: this is not a theoretical application. We are building 250+ cars per day, ramping up quickly to 500-650 cars per day. I'm hoping I can solve this problem from an architectural standpoint, without having to modify each individual bean, because we have on the order of 200-300 SFSBs that would have to be changed--not a pretty thing in a production critical application. We have two AIX servers, but one of them is currenlty just a hot standby because we cannot run both of them at the same time because of problem 1) from above. We'd like to be able to run both servers at the same time for load-balancing purposes. Furthermore, if one box fails then all SFSB data will be lost because of the problem is mentioned problem 2) above.
    (As a point of clarification, and only because I don't know if this affects any possible suggestions, but the clients do not use remote references to the EJBs. They simply pass "data containers" via HTTP to the server, and this data is passed to the various EJBs and returned back to the client via HTTP Response and in some cases TCP/IP. In either case, we do not use "remote object" references in the most typical sense. The servlet maintains the references to the EJBs.)
    I've read things about "session clustering" but have not pinned down the subject. I have the "Core J2EE Patterns" book on order.
    Any suggestions or pointers to reading materials would be greatly, greatly appreciated. I also welcome the "what you should have done" variety suggestions.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Doug Wilkerson

    Doug,
    Here are my thoughts, I hope they help.
    I don't think there is a possibility to have two different client (different sessions) talk to one and the same SFSB. A SFSB is specific to a users session and cannot be shared.
    The way I would tackle this problem is probably by using SLSB which might access either an entity bean or the DB directly. This way, you might cause DB overhead, but you can share the data between clustered servers and the users will work with the correct data.
    About the second question, I don't really now a pattern to provide fail-over for SFSB. To my opinion that is the weakest side of SFSB (beside all the load-balancing that needs to take place).
    Hope this helps.

  • Sharing across multiple devices

    HI...I have 5 Apple devices in my home between me, my husband & my kids and we all purchase things on our individual devices.
    For some reason, I can't get music that my husband purchased on his iPad to go on my iPhone...It's in the library but won't be dragged to my device.
    I have the Home Sharing on our accounts but I'm missing something...Can anyone help? THX!!!

    At the present time iPhoto is not compatible with any know NAS (and I doubt if it ever will be since it is free with all new systems and $15 to purchase)
    You can give the Aperture forum a shot and see if the higher end users there ahve ideas - the also is a DAM forum (not an apple forum) where all DIgital Asset Managers are discussed - a better source for yoru questions
    LN

  • Internet tabs sharing across devices

    Hello,
    Two of the machines in our office have recently started sending Chrome and Safari tabs to each other every time a page is opened. If someone opens a page, an Icon pops up on the other computer's dock like this:
    When selecting this icon, the webpage then opens up on the other computer. We've been looking everywhere but can't find what this feature is called and how to turn it off. Could anyone who recognises this let us know?
    Thanks very much
    Owen

    In the General pane of System Preferences, uncheck the box marked
              Allow Handoff between this Mac and your iCloud devices

  • BSPs configuration with multiple apps servers

    Hi Masters,
    This is regrarding configure ICM and BSPs on our production box with multiple application servers.
    We have our production box in a cluster environment.
    The central instance is dbciSAP and apps servers are sapaps2 thru sapaps6. The database is on shared disks. Whenever the central instance fails sapaps2 takes the control and become as dbciSAP but the main dbciSAP never become a application server when ever sapaps2 acts as dbciSAP. Since we have configured load balancing concept in production environment the users can login to system thru any application server. This is waht our environment.
    As part of our production box to SAP 4.7 upgrade from 4.6C, we are asked to configure the environment to deploy BSPs. We have successfully configured and deployed the BSPs in our DEV and QAS system  (Both are central instances with no application servers) except production box which is due in the next month.
    The process we follow to activate BSPs is as follows:
    1.Define an ICM service port in /etc/services file.
    2.Add the ICM related parameters in instance profiles.
    3.Make sure the ICM status is active in SMICM tx.
    4.Activate the BSP services in SICF as per OSS note 571484.
    Now, the question is how to configure the same ICM service and activate the BSPs since we have multiple multiple application servers.
    Subsequently What I am enquirying is:
    Do I need to define ICM service ports on each and every hosts where the application servers are running?
    Do I need to make changes to each and every instance profile of the application server?
    What are the differences in configuring ICM services on central instance and application instances?
    Appreciate any help in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    Murty Patchipala

    Grasshopper,
    I think what you should really read up on is the SAP WebDispatcher.  If are serious about running BSP/ICM across multiple app servers, this is the key technology:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/5cfd3b0e59774ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm  This may also answer some of your questions about profile parameters.
    Other than that I can share what we did.  We did activate the ICM and services on all app servers and central instance.  The service ports of the individual servers aren't that important now because of the WebDispatcher (at least they aren't visible to the user).
    Yes we did make some of the ICM profile changes in each instance profile.  If your settings are the same, consider using the default profile.   Are their particular settings you are interested?  I will look over ours, but I don't remember any huge differences from APP server to Central Instance.

  • Connection pooling & multiple apps in single instance - many sessions

    Any feedback would be much appreciated from anyone with experience already with this situation and/or can provide some insight on this:
    Adhering to the trend of consolidating instances, we have a single consolidated instance with multiple apps. With connection pooling (we use apache & mod_perl), I suppose you have an option of creating some oracle db accounts that can be shared among multiple apps - that benefits you in reducing the numbers of total pooled db connections to the instance - but one very big drawback is that you have some apps, if sharing generic db userids, having access to tables they have no need to access.
    On another hand, you have the option (which is the approach we've taken thus far and, in my view, is definitely the way to go) of a distinct oracle account for each app - on the downside, that could produce many more total db sessions (& os processes) on the server as each new set of unique persistent pooled connections are created - but it benefits you in terms of security - which has a lot of weight - since each app account only has access to what it needs & nothing beyond that (the "least privilege" concept).
    We're not an "amazon.com" so we haven't had to deal with thousands of sessions within an instance so there's an element of the unknown here for us - some questions I have are: How can I accurately predict how many db sessions (& os processes) this particular solaris server can support? I realize kernel parameters need to be set high enough for this sort of environment but simply setting the parameters cannot be a true indication of what the server can support. How much memory is required for thousands of sessions? I'm trying to gauge how many sessions & processes we can currently support - and at what point we'll need additional memory, or an updated server, or at what point we need to start thinking about an additional server environment for new apps.
    I realize connection pooling is, by it nature, reducing the overall sessions required but as each unique db account is created, there will be set of persistent sessions out there and that will grow.
    Also if you have any insight on other things to think about when heading into the direction of lots of sessions (beyond kernel settings, other OS or db parameters that need to be reviewed, or some features to enable).
    I'm rambling so I'll stop right there; sorry about the length of the post. It's possible that the things to look at and consider are pretty straight-forward.
    Thanks in advance for any feedback on any of the above.
    -Rick Papaj
    [email protected]

    You better check the documentation available on OTN
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B25221_03/web.1013/b14432/threadpool.htm
    There are several options you can setup with pooling.
    hope this helps.

  • Keyboard Freezing on Multiple Apps

    Not sure what caused this. Been running everything fine for months. I did do the most recent update (to version 4.5.602.MB810.Verizon.en.US), but it worked fine for a few days.
    I'm finding my keyboard freezing, in all applications (Handcent, Facebook, Twitter, Gmail), when I try to use any form of punctuation mark (period, comma, question mark, etc). It happens sporadically and seems to have no common denominator. If it happens while replying in Handcent (quick text mode or full app mode), I can still hit send - but then it ends up sending duplicates of the text message. Facebook it will post the comment only once it seems.
    As it's across multiple apps, this seems more like a system issue. I've gone through and cleared my cache and data for the multi-touch keyboard. I've also downloaded a third party app to clear out all my cache as I, too, had the problem with the disappearing keyboard. But none of this seems to fix it.
    Any suggestions? Is there a way to rollback to the previous Android version, even though it worked fine for a few days?

    Try disabling vibrate/sound on keypress if you have it enabled.
    I've also heard that clearing the Learned Words from your keyboard app will help with this as well.
    The easiest way that would work would be to get a keyboard app from the market. There are plenty of free ones that are great. I personally use Smart Keyboard Pro and love it. It's got a free trial version to see if you like it.
    Going back to a previous version is a violation of this forum and cannot be discussed here, although there are other Android forums that allow it.

  • Sharing an iTunes Library across multiple user account and a network.

    Sharing an iTunes Music Library across multiple user accounts.
    Hello Everybody!
    Firstly, this was designed to be run in Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger. It will not work with earlier versions of Mac OS X! Sorry.
    Here's a handy tip for keeping your hard drive neat and tidy, it also saves space, what in effect will be done is an iTunes music library will be shared amongst multiple users on the same machine. There are advantages and disadvantages to using this method.
    • Firstly I think it might be worthwhile to state the advantages and disadvantages to using this approach.
    The advantages include:
    - Space will be saved, as no duplicate files will occur.
    - The administrator will be able to have complete control over the content of the iTunes library, this may be useful for restricting the content of the Library; particularly for example if computer is being used at and education institution, business or any other sort of institution where things such as explicit content would be less favorable.
    - The machine will not be slowed by the fact that every user has lots of files.
    The disadvantages to this system include.
    - The fact that the account storing the music will have to be logged in, and iTunes will have to be active in that account.
    - If the account housing the music is not active then nobody can use the iTunes library.
    - There is a certain degree of risk present when an administrator account must be continually active.
    - Fast User Switching must be enabled.
    Overview:
    A central account controls all music on the machine/network, this is achieved by storing iTunes files in a public location as opposed to in the user's directory. In effect the system will give all users across the machine/network access to the same music/files without the possibility of files 'doubling up' because two different users like the same types of music. This approach saves valuable disk space in this regard and may therefore prove to be useful in some situations.
    This is a hearty process to undertake, so only follow this tutorial if you're willing to go all the way to the end of it.
    Process:
    Step 1:
    Firstly, we need to organize the host library, I tidied mine up, removing excess playlists, random files, things like that. this will make thing a bit easier in the later stages of this process.
    Once the library is tidied up, move the entire "iTunes" folder from your Home directory to the "//localhost" directory (The Macintosh HD) and ensure that files are on the same level as the "Applications", "Users", "Library" and "System" directories; this will ensure that the files in the library are available to all users on the machine (this also works for networks)
    Optionally you can set the ownership of the folder to the 'administrator' account (the user who will be hosting the library.), you may also like to set the permissions of 'you can' to "Read & Write" (assuming that you are doing this through the user who will host the library); secondly you should set the "Owner" to the administrator who will be hosting the library and set their "access" to "Read & Write" (this will ensure that the administrator has full access to the folder). The final part of this step involves setting access for the "Others" tab to "Read Only" this will ensure that the other users can view but not modify the contents on the folder.
    Overview:
    So far we have done the following steps:
    1. Organized the host library.
    2. Placed the iTunes directory into a 'public' directory so that other users may use it. (this step is essential if you plan on sharing the library across multiple accounts on the same machine. NOTE: this step is only necessary if you are wanting to share you library across multiple accounts on the same machine, if you simply want to share the music across a network, use the iTunes sharing facility.
    3. set ownership and permissions for the iTunes music folder.
    Step 2:
    Currently the administrator is the only user who can use this library, however we will address this soon. In this step we will enable iTunes music sharing in the administrator's account, this will enable other users to access the files in the library.
    If you are not logged in as the administrator, do so; secondly, open iTunes and select "Preferences" from the "iTunes" menu, now click the "Sharing" tab, if "share my library on my local network" is not checked, the radio buttons below this will now become active, you may choose to share the entire libraries contents, or share only selected content.
    Sharing only selected content may be useful if their is explicit content in the library and minors use the network or machine that the library is connected to.
    If you have selected "share entire library" go to Step 3, if you have selected share "share selected playlists" read on.
    After clicking "share selected playlists" you must then select the playlists that you intend to share across your accounts and network. Once you have finished selecting the playlists, click "OK" to save the settings.
    Overview:
    In this step we:
    1. Enabled iTunes sharing in the administrator's account, now, users on the local network may access the iTunes library, however, users on the same machine may not.
    Step 3:
    Now we will enable users on the same machine to access the library on the machine. This is achieved by logging in as each user, opening iTunes, opening iTunes preferences, and clicking "look for shared music". now all users on the machine may also access the library that the administrator controls.
    This in effect will mean that the user will not need to use their user library, it will be provided to them via a pseudo network connection.
    As a secondary measure, I have chosen to write a generic login script that will move any content from the user's "Music/iTunes/iTunes Music" directory to the trash and then empties the user's trash.
    This is done through the use of an Automator Application: this application does the following actions.
    1. Uses the "Finder" action "Get Specified Finder Items"
    1a. The user's "~/Music/iTunes/iTunes Music" folder
    2. Uses the "Finder" action "Get Folder Contents"
    3. Uses the "Finder" action "Move to Trash"
    4. Uses the "Automator" action "Run AppleScript"
    4a. with the following:
    on run {input, parameters}
    tell application "Finder"
    empty trash
    end tell
    return input
    end run
    IMPORTANT: Once the script is adapted to the user account it must be set as a login item. in order to keep the script out of the way i have placed it in the user's "Library" directory, in "Application Support" under "iTunes".
    Overview:
    Here we:
    1. Enabled iTunes sharing in the user accounts on the host machine, in effect allowing all users of the machine to view a single iTunes library.
    2. (Optional) I have created a login application that will remove any content that has been added to user iTunes libraries, this in effect stops other users of the machine from adding music and files to iTunes.
    Step 4:
    If it is not already enabled, open system preferences and enable Fast User Switching in Accounts Options.
    Summary:
    We have shared a single iTunes library across multiple user account, while still allowing for network sharing. This method is designed to save space on machines, particularly those with smaller hard drives.
    I hope that this hint proves to be helpful and I hope everybody will give me feedback on my process.
    regards,
    Pete.
    iBook G4; 60GB Hard Drive, 512MB RAM, Airport Extreme   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   iWork & iLife '06, Adobe CS2, Final Cut Pro. Anything and Everything!!!

    how to share music between different accounts on a single computer

  • Sharing one iTunes library across multiple accounts on the same Mac

    Hello, I've poked around at some of the posts dealing with sharing one iTunes music library across multiple accounts on the same Mac but it seems like this can only be done if the libary is moved to a shared folder. I realize this can be done but I was trying to share it the way it is described in a post on Apple support (See link below.). That post seemed to imply that you don't have to move the library from its original location (owned by account A, e.g.), rather just make a couple preference changes in the accounts, use fast user switching and voila. That doesn't seem to work. So my question is this: Is the only way to share one iTunes music library across multiple accounts on the same Mac to move it to a shared folder? I'm running 10.4.8 on an Intel iMac. Thanks in advance!
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93195

    After reading this and several other related threads, I am becoming thoroughly confused about all of this. I have a situation similar to the one that pokerpal described in the post dated January 7 at 8:06 pm, except that the music files on my system are located on an external hard drive. Everything else is pretty much the same though - I am the admin user (and the main iTunes user and maintainer) and my girlfriend is a standard user who has no music in her own iTunes library. She can see and listen to and make playlists from and sync her iPod with the music in this library from her account, and I can do the same thing, independent of her, from my account. And if I make a change to information within a song, she doesn't see it, and vice versa, and I understand that. What I don't understand is why when I add a song or an album to the music files by importing a CD or downloading something from the iTunes Music Store, she has no way of knowing that unless I tell her, and then she can add it to her library by using the "Add to Library" function. Is there no way of automatically updating her library files to add the new song(s)? We have almost 15,000 songs and videos in that library, and I don't even want to think about what might have to happen if the answer to my question is "no." Interestingly enough, if I put an update to a Word document in the same exact location (on the hard drive), we can update that and pass it back and forth all day - why is that such a difficult task for iTunes to accomplish?
    Sorry I went on so long, but this has been building up for some time, and none of the solutions I've read about here have really been of any help, so I'm a bit frustrated and, as I said at the beginning, confused.
    iMac G5, MacBook   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Syncing safari tabs across multiple macs

    I have a Mac Mini as my primary mac and a MBA as my "leisure" Mac. I thought with syncing that all my Safari tabs would be the same in both, like is done well with Mail, Contacts, and Calendar. However, I've just changed my Mini Safari tabs, and I went to my MBA expecting to see the same framework, and it has not updated. What do I need to do to sync across multiple macs?

    The tabs are not synced, just the bookmarks. Tabs are not data or content, just a window frame for different URLs.

  • Kobo APP download Docs, PDF's Kobo said to convert the PDF using Adobe Digital Editions, then I'd be able to upload to the Kobe APP via iTunes. Where is File Sharing under the Apps tab located?

    I've uploaded my PDF to Adobe Digital Editions, but can't find where on iTunes to select file sharing under the Apps Tab... as specified in the instructions in the Kobo APP for the iPhone... and a rep from Kobo told me it was possible.

    For future questions, this forum is for questions from those managing sites on iTunes U, Apple's service for colleges and universities to post educational material in the iTunes Store. You'll be most likely to get help with an issue if you ask in the general iTunes forums.
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for