Tag issue when upgrading from PSE 7 to 11

I've upgraded from PSE 7 to 11 and the tags for people, while there, do not appear in the "people" section fo PSE11. Any suggestions on how to get them all to show?

In PSE11, people tags have been moved to People view, this view contains all people tags along with categories. In case you want to view them along with tags panel, it can be enabled through View->Show People in Tag panel.

Similar Messages

Abap issues when upgrading from 4.7 to ecc6.0

hello All,
I am posting this question with intention of general issues we face that are abap related when upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6.0,
do the programs ahve to be adjusted, if sumone cud also throw some light on what is unicode and wat role does it play in the upgrade,
some specific examples wud be appreciated
thanks,
RS

hi,
Go through this
Unicode is an international standard that assigns characters from virtually every
language and script a unique Unicode Scalar Value, which is a number written in
hexadecimal notation.
     Character     Unicode Scalar Value     Unicode Character Name
     A      U+0041          LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
     Ä     U+00C4          LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
     α     U+03B1          GREEK SMALL LATTER ALPHA
Implementing the Unicode standard enables a single software product or a single
web site to be accessed across multiple platforms, languages, and countries without
the need for re-engineering. It allows data to be transferred across many different
SAP and non-SAP systems without corruption. To meet these requirements, the SAP
Unicode team continues to promote Unicode-enabled SAP systems, aid their
installation, and provide tools and full technical support for the smooth
conversion of existing SAP non-Unicode systems to Unicode.

How to maintain tags when upgrading from PSE 5 to PSE 12?

I'm upgrading from Photoshop Elements version 5 to version 12, as my current version is not working properly. (Possibly corrupted?). It will not allow me to backup my catalog - the software freezes after a period of time during the "Reconnecting Files" stage. I'm reluctant to proceed in fear of losing the thousands of tags I have if the installation process does not go smoothly (since I don't have a backup of my catalog). Any suggestions on how to proceed?

Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately my situation may be worse than I
originally thought. ALL of my files are showing that they are "Missing" and
need to be "Reconnected," however the software freezes when I try to
reconnect. I still have the photo files under "My Photos" on my hard drive
but if the "Reconnect" is not made before launching Version 12, doesn't
that mean that I will lose all the cataloging/tags made in Photoshop? I
plan to install PSE12 on the same machine. I'm at a loss on how to proceed.
It would be so disappointing to lose hundreds of hours of organization over
a ten year time period on thousands of photos.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, andaleebfatima1

How do you keep Tags organized when upgrading to PSE 9?

I installed PSE 9 after using PSE 7 for the last two years. Once it installed and I opened Organizer, Organizer found my existing PSE 7 Catalog and asked if I wanted to convert it. I did, but lost the organization of my Keyword Tags. All my photos retained their Tags (I write my Tags into each photo) but I lost my organizational tree. The Tags were all found, listed alphabetically and disorganized, in the "Imported Keyword Tags" Category. In other words, Tags in categories and subcategories were mixed together. I have over 50K photos and over 150 Tags. Needless to say, it was a pain re-organizing them. Unfortunately, I was unable to view Full Screen slide shows (hitting the Play button crashed Organizer) and was advised by Support to un-install and re-install PSE 9. I REALLY do not want to have to re-organize my Keyword Tags again. Is there any way to retain my catalog's organizational tree?

Thanks for the reply. I have used every PSE except PSE 8, in the past. When I purchased my current PC, I installed PSE 7 and rebuilt my catalog by using the "Get photos from files" function. Consequently, I had to rebuild my Keyword Tags organizational tree. When I installed PSE 9 on this same PC, it "found" my PSE 7 catalog and asked if I wanted to convert it. I clicked to agree. It converted my Catalog, which did contain Albums in PSE 7, but I lost my Tag's organizational tree and no Albums were present in PSE 9. They are still present in PSE 7. As I mentioned, tech support had me un-install and re-install PSE 9, which I did after your first reply, and indeed the Tags appeared and were organized when I re-installed PSE 9, but again, I have no albums in PSE 9.

Mail issues when upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion

Hello,
I'm hoping someone out there may be able to answer this question or offer some advice. I am being prompted by Apple to move over to iCloud which requires me upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion. I am extremely reluctant to do this as I have heard of problems when migrating to Lion, especially with Mail. I presently have over 30,000 emails in my inbox. These mails are divided into a multitude of folders all on my mac. I have a mac email account along with other non Apple email accounts (POP) on my Mac. These emails and the folder structure are fundamental to my work so losing any emails or even the folder structure would be disastrous for me. I have of course made a backup (2 in fact) but do like the idea of trying to rebuild everything from scratch. Any advice would be greatly welcomed. Thanks.

I'm no expert but at the moment I just woudn't do it as there appears to be lots of unexplained problems with mail and Lion. I have been a Mac user from the earliest days and have never ever had the kinds of problems I am currently having to work around since installing Lion. I wish I had stayed with Snow Leopard.

Preformance issues when upgrading from dbxml 2.3.8 to 2.4.13

I have recently upgraded my dbxml distribution from 2.3.8 to 2.4.13 (including the latest patch). I have noticed that many of the queries I issue take longer than they used to. Specifically if the query is complex it takes 10 times as long as it did with 2.3.8. Also I have noted a difference in speed between issuing the query via the dbxml shell (query takes ~45 seconds) vs issuing it through a c++ interface (query takes 4+ minutes). The query am issuing is:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
if I simplify the query by removing references to the obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high nodes:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
it returns much faster. I am wondering if this is an issue with optimization of the complex query?
The database is fully indexed and was re-indexed when I upgraded to 2.4.13

Doug,
I've got your container. It's a wholedoc container with document indexes (a lot of them). Here's what I see for query speeds for your large, slow query using the dbxml shell.
Query is:
query "for $i in collection('pdb.dbxml')/project where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test'] return $i"
2.3.11 -- 2.4 seconds
2.4.13 -- 60 seconds
That is a significant slowdown and it needs further investigation but is almost certainly related to the fact that it is wholedoc storage. The optimizer appears to be choosing unwisely. This will take a few days to work out.
I also changed the container to be node storage with node indexes and the times went to:
2.3.11 -- 13 sec (slower than wholedoc)
2.4.13 -- 40 sec (faster than wholedoc)
I do know why your application is slower than the dbxml shell. There is a new flag that should almost always be used for wholedoc container queries -- DBXML_DOCUMENT_PROJECTION. Add that to you query excecution.
Another thing -- query preparation is a bit slower in 2.4 so you should use prepared queries whenever possible to amortize that cost.
Regards,
George

Issues when Upgrading from SRSS 4.1 to 5.2.1

Hi There.
Yesterday I upgraded a client's environment from SRSS 4.1 to 5.2.1.
Environment:
Solaris 10 hosting Sun Ray Server, Kiosk Mode configured with Windows Connector pointing at Windows Server 2003 Terminal Server. Used utadm to remove the old firmware config and reconfigured with the new firmware config. All Thin Clients now have the new Oracle Branded Firmware.
After the Upgrade, the users can't seem to hold down the Backspace Key to erase text at a faster pace or use Page Down in an Excel Spreadsheet to get through their workbooks faster. When these buttons are used in their held down position the performance is really slow. Tapping these keys however works fine.
EG: Tapping backspace 20 times to erase 20 Characters is ok. Holding down the Backspace Key to do the same thing is very slow.
Anyone know of any issues or performance issues Post running this upgrade.
Cheers
- Joe.

have you looked at the following performance tuning?
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25745/html/Tuning-Performance-Improving-Network-Performance.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25745/html/Troubleshooting-Network-Switches.html
Some other options to consider
-D Disables the video acceleration path for Windows 7 and
Windows 2008 R2.
-M off
Specify which accelerated media paths to use (supported
only with Windows XP and Windows 2003).
-M off
Specify which accelerated media paths to use (supported
only with Windows XP and Windows 2003).
-F off|x11|xvideo|all|keep
Specify which flash acceleration paths to use and
allows to set the flash state to it's initial state
when session is disconnected.
So can't say that his is a bug. All known issues have been fixed by SRS 5.3. If you still have problems, please open a Service Request via My Oracle Support see
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25743/html/Support.html

Webservice publish issue when upgrading from 11.1.1.4.0 to 11.1.2.0.0

Was working fine in 11.1.1.4.0 then I upgraded to 11.1.2.0.0 and now when I click on "Webservice Properties" then go to methods some are grayed out. I click the "Why Not?" button and it says.
There was an error validating the SEI, but no specific error messages were reported.
Go back, open the same project up in 1.1.1.4.0 and no problems. I even cut the service down to one simple method to publish and still get the error.
Any ideas?
Edited by: bartmc on Aug 26, 2011 11:24 AM

I have the identical issue. Is there any solution? I am o on a clean install of 11.1.2.1 and it is doing this. If I add another dummy method to the class, I can get one step further and select the method I want, but then I get the same SEI error.

MAXDB issue when upgrading from SP14 to SP15

Hello,
I am trying to upgrade my local WAS to SP15. I am getting the following DB error during the installation (excerpt from callSdmViaSapinst.log file):
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating connections to database "J2E".
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating vendor connection to database.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Vendor connection created successfully.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating openSQL connection to database.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:03... Info: OpenSQL connection created successfully.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGHEADER[START]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!HELP[Manual modification of the header may cause parsing problem!]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGGINGVERSION[1.5.3.7186 - 630]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!NAME[C:\usr\sap\J2E\JC00\SDM\program\log\jddilog20060215103203.log]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!PATTERN[jddilog20060215103203.log]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!FORMATTER[com.sap.dictionary.database.dbs.DbTraceFormatter(%s %m %-30l %24d)]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!ENCODING[Cp1252]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGHEADER[END]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: E R R O R ******* (DbObjectSqlStatements)
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: 10:32:04 2006-02-15 dbs-Error: Exception caught during SQL execution [-6000] (at 15): Duplicate table name:BC_CMSRTS CREATE TABLE "BC_CMSRTS"("VENDOR" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "NAME" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "PROVIDER" VARCHAR(40) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CMSNAME" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CMSURL" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "TRACKNAME" VARCHAR(8) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "SYSTYPE" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "LOCATION" VARCHAR(40) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CONFIGTYPE" VARCHAR(5) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "RELEASE" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "SERVICELEVEL" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "PATCHLEVEL" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "APPLYTIME" VARCHAR(20) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' )
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: E R R O R ******* (DbModificationManager)
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: 10:32:04 2006-02-15 dbs-Error: Statements could not be executed successfully
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Aborted: development component 'tc/SL/UTIL_JDD'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'6.4015.00.0000.20051027101403.0000':
No further description found.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: -
Deployment was successful -
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: Summarizing the deployment results:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Admitted: C:\Documents and Settings\DKEISERlocal\My Documents\Portal\installs\WAS15\J2EE-RUNT-CD\J2EE-ENG\OFFLINE\SAPJEECOR15_0.SCA
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Admitted: C:\Documents and Settings\DKEISERlocal\My Documents\Portal\installs\WAS15\J2EE-RUNT-CD\J2EE-ENG\OFFLINE\JRFC.SDA
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:06... Error: Processing error. Return code: 4
Have tried everything I know of (restarting, etc.). Also tried to drop the duplicate table and it won't let me. Anyone have any ideas??
Thanks in advance...

Hi,
you could try (re)loading the MaxDB system tables. You can do that using either the Database Manager GUI, or from the commandline:
dbmcli -d <SID> -u <dbm-user>,<pwd> load_systab -u <dba-user>,<pwd> -ud DOMAIN
The standard dbm-user is called 'control', the standard dba-user 'superdba'.
Kind regards,
Roland

Lost tags, etc. when upgraded from Elements 2 to 6, and XP to Vista on new computer.

I was using Photoshop Album 2 on old XP computer. About a year ago, I got new computer with Vista and I installed Photoshop Elements 6 on it. I had copied files from old computer onto a flash drive, then from the flash drive to the new computer. The pictures came over fine, but I lost all of the tagging. Any way to get that back?

You need to find the PSA2 catalog file, and copy that as well. I believe the default name of the file is My Catalog.psa, but I don't know where it would have been stored. You could search your hard disk for *.psa (turning on the feature to search in hidden fodlers). Then, you will have to convert the catalog to PSE6 (File->Catalog->Convert).
Or, in PSA2, File->Backup Catalog and then in PSE6 File->Restore Catalog

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Trouble upgrading from PSE 3.0 to PSE 8.0

I'm getting an unusable format of my ver 8.0 when upgrading from ver 3.0. My 3.0 PHOTO browser is OK but my 3.0 FILE browser is a mess because I moved many files by "getting" pictures and "deleting from catalog" rather than using the FILE browser in Editor. Does ver 8.0 look at the PHOTO browser or the FILE browser when installing. If this is the problem, is there a way to re-initialize or update the ver 3.0 file browser before I install ver 8.0. I'm using Windows XP SP3. I'll appreciate any help. I'm stuck.

I have used Windows Explorer to managemy directories and files for some time. Last night while trying to get a handle on what was happening I found two troubling things. First, adding or deleting categories and sub-categories in PSE 3 Organizer does not add or delete them in the Editor File Browser. Not having used the File Editor for some time I never discovered this. I'm sure that somewhere, early on in my use of PSE 3, I found information that lead me to believed that the two browsers held the same information.
The second thing has also escaped me for some time because I ignored the File Browser. There was a second copy of the Documents folder and the My Pictures folder in the File Browser. These were relics from a long time ago when I had placed shortcuts to both the Documents folder and the My Pictures folder on my desktop because it made it easier to access them. As I grew more familiar with using the program I realized that a shortcut to Windows Explorer was all I needed. So, I sent both the Documents and Pictures shortcuts to the Recycle bin. That, of course, as I found with Categories and Sub-categories, did not remove the short cuts from the File Browser. I was not aware that the shortcuts were still in the File Browser. All of this simply means that when I tried to upgrade to PSE 8 it was confused. When I removed PSE 8 after the bad install things got more scrambled.
I have removed the second copies of Documents and Pictures and am now starting on the, I'm afraid, long process of getting my files in order. It's clear to me why the two browsers didn't agree. Thanks for your help. I appreciate it.

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

Best way to upgrade from PSE 5.0 to PSE 8

I have installed, as an administrator, PhotoShop Elements 5.0, for a user. I wan to upgrade that to PhotoShop Elements 8.
What is the best way to do this?
When I did this several years ago, going from PhotoShop Album 2.0 to PSE 5.0 it was suggested to do this, which I did:
I backed up the catalog through the menu option in PhotoShop Album. Uninstalled PhotoShop Album, Installed the new PhotoShop Elements 5.0. Restored the catalog. This worked perfectly fine. Is this a good route to go for an upgrade from PSE 5 to PSE 8? Is there a better way?
Thanks for any tips.
Mark Miesfeld

Thanks for the quick response.
The user on this system mostly uses PhotoShop Elements 5.0 to orgainize her photos. I don't think she does much editing of the photos. She has over 20,000 photos.
I thought that upgrading ti PSE 8 would give her better performance. But, I now see several reviews saying that the orgainizer performance in PSE 7 and PSE 8 is worse.
Do you have any comment on that?
Thanks again.
Mark Miesfeld

Upgrading from PSE 9 to 12

I tried to do this several times but each time it failed. When I checked my account it said that "It may take 24 hours for my order to be processed. Is this the reason why my download failed?

Hi Kuideep, thanks it is fixed now. I downloaded it again last night and it worked.
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:42:26 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Upgrading from PSE 9 to 12
    Re: Upgrading from PSE 9 to 12
    created by Kuldeep Kandpal in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up - View the full discussion
Hi donlancs,
Could you please let us know the exact error message when you are downloading the software.
Regards
     Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5794701#5794701
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5794701#5794701
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5794701#5794701. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
           Start a new discussion in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Tag issue when upgrading from PSE 7 to 11

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for