Targets/ADDM report

Is there a way to get a report of a list all database targets's ADDM report in one email report?

oracleRaj wrote:
Thanks I have checked it, I wanted to know How Can I Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID " XYZ " in EM ?The links provided to you will tell you how to do it, and the EM wizard is fairly self explanatory. I'm going to ask why you want to. You ran a report for 1/2 an hour on a system presumably with at least 2 CPUs (though you don't say) so that means you have most likely over an hours worth of CPU available to you. Your total database time is 6 minutes. That doesn't sound like a struggling database to me, does it to you? If you manage to save 66% of the time then you'll have saved 4 minutes. Is that a worthwhile goal.
However let's take a look at the most costly statement - the update - that consumes 112s or nearly 2 of your 6 minutes. However each execution only takes a twentieth of a second. Do your users notice that and want the update time to be (say) a fiftieth of a second instead? Where you might have an opportunity is in the fact that this statement is really quick, but is executed 2256 times in that half hour - that is 75 times a second. It's more than likely that this is a loop and that a more efficient way of doing this would be not to execute in the loop but execute a set based update. Unfortunately the SQL Tuning advisor isn't capable of making this sort of recommendation.
In total then it looks like you've only actually got 4 minutes of your half hour that the SQL Tuning Advisor is likely to be able to improve. The count(*) might be improvable - if say you haven't got an index on the send_unsend column and that column is selective - but you still have to ask is the potential improvement worth it.
Niall Litchfield
http:/www.orawin.info

Similar Messages

  • Performance issue in DB need help with analysing this ADDM report

    Hi,
    My environment:
    Os: RHEL5U3 / 11.1.0.7 64 bit / R12.1.1 64 bit
    Issue:
    Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instance. Normally the issue will occur 5 to 10 minutes occasionally per day. At the time of issue we not able to access the EBS application its taking time to load. But backend all the oracle, listener and apps services are up and running. No locks at table and session level. Cpu and memory usage is normal.
    We have monitored using "Enterprise Manager" for this issue and we found the wait session present more in Active session tab. At this time EBS application is not able access its loading too time. After some time the in Active session tab the wait session came normal and when we try to access the EBS application its working fine.
    We try to find the cause of the issue by running addm report. But am not able to understand what its says. Kindly suggests me
    ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_42656'
    Analysis Period
    AWR snapshot range from 14754 to 14755.
    Time period starts at 17-APR-12 11.00.22 AM
    Time period ends at 17-APR-12 12.00.33 PM
    Analysis Target
    Database 'PRD' with DB ID 1789440879.
    Database version 11.1.0.7.0.
    ADDM performed an analysis of instance PRD, numbered 1 and hosted at
    advgrpdb.advgroup.ae.
    Activity During the Analysis Period
    Total database time was 18674 seconds.
    The average number of active sessions was 5.17.
    Summary of Findings
    Description Active Sessions Recommendations
    Percent of Activity
    1 Top SQL by DB Time 3.43 | 66.33 5
    2 Buffer Busy 2.52 | 48.81 5
    3 Buffer Busy 1.39 | 26.81 2
    4 Log File Switches .91 | 17.56 1
    5 Buffer Busy .56 | 10.87 2
    6 Undersized SGA .38 | 7.37 1
    7 Commits and Rollbacks .28 | 5.42 1
    8 Undo I/O .18 | 3.53 0
    9 CPU Usage .13 | 2.57 1
    10 Top SQL By I/O .11 | 2.21 1
    Findings and Recommendations
    Finding 1: Top SQL by DB Time
    Impact is 3.43 active sessions, 66.33% of total activity.
    SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
    Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
    Estimated benefit is 1.59 active sessions, 30.8% of total activity.
    Action
    Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" for possible
    performance improvements.
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
    SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
    P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
    R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
    R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
    E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
    P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
    DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
    R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
    R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
    R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
    R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
    O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
    A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
    HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
    R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
    R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
    R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
    R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
    R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
    TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
    Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
    NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
    'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
    R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
    R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
    R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
    R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
    R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
    X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
    X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
    X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
    X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
    X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
    X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
    X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
    X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
    X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
    X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
    X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
    X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
    X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
    X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
    X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
    NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
    fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
    A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
    fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
    fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
    ((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
    (R.OPS_INSTANCE =
    decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
    R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
    P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
    P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
    A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
    E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
    E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
    A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
    = C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
    :q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
    is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
    R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
    'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
    'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
    Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
    'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
    Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
    ((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
    (R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
    ((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
    ((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
    ((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
    60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
    R.status_code NoWait
    Rationale
    SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was executed 4686 times and
    had an average elapsed time of 1.2 seconds.
    Rationale
    Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
    accounted for 85% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
    statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
    Rationale
    Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
    class "Configuration" accounted for 9% of the database time spent in
    processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
    Recommendation 3: SQL Tuning
    Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.91% of total activity.
    Action
    Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" for possible
    performance improvements.
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
    UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
    Rationale
    SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" was executed 266 times and had
    an average elapsed time of 7.6 seconds.
    Rationale
    Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
    accounted for 86% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
    statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
    Rationale
    Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
    class "Configuration" accounted for 7% of the database time spent in
    processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
    Finding 2: Buffer Busy
    Impact is 2.52 active sessions, 48.81% of total activity.
    Read and write contention on database blocks was consuming significant
    database time.
    Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
    Estimated benefit is 1.42 active sessions, 27.44% of total activity.
    Action
    Trace the cause of object contention due to SELECT statements in the
    application using the information provided.
    Related Object
    Database object with ID 34562.
    Rationale
    The SELECT statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was significantly
    affected by "buffer busy" waits.
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
    SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
    P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
    R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
    R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
    E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
    P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
    DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
    R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
    R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
    R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
    R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
    O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
    A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
    HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
    R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
    R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
    R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
    R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
    R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
    TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
    Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
    NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
    'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
    R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
    R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
    R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
    R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
    R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
    X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
    X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
    X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
    X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
    X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
    X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
    X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
    X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
    X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
    X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
    X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
    X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
    X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
    X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
    X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
    NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
    fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
    A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
    fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
    fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
    ((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
    (R.OPS_INSTANCE =
    decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
    R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
    P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
    P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
    A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
    E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
    E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
    A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
    = C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
    :q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
    is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
    R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
    'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
    'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
    Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
    'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
    Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
    ((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
    (R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
    ((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
    ((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
    ((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
    60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
    R.status_code NoWait
    UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
    Recommendation 1: Schema Changes
    Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, .62% of total activity.
    Action
    Consider rebuilding the TABLE "APPLSYS.FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS" with object
    ID 34651 using a higher value for PCTFREE.
    Related Object
    Database object with ID 34651.
    Rationale
    The UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "cqc5crhxxt36t" was significantly
    affected by "buffer busy" waits.
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID cqc5crhxxt36t.
    UPDATE FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS FLRF SET END_TIME = SYSDATE WHERE
    FLRF.LOGIN_ID = :B2 AND FLRF.LOGIN_RESP_ID = :B1 AND FLRF.END_TIME IS
    NULL AND (FLRF.FORM_ID, FLRF.FORM_APPL_ID) = (SELECT F.FORM_ID,
    F.APPLICATION_ID FROM FND_FORM F, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE F.FORM_NAME
    = :B4 AND F.APPLICATION_ID = A.APPLICATION_ID AND
    A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B3 )
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
    Finding 4: Log File Switches
    Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
    Log file switch operations were consuming significant database time while
    waiting for checkpoint completion.
    This problem can be caused by use of hot backup mode on tablespaces. DML to
    tablespaces in hot backup mode causes generation of additional redo.
    Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
    Estimated benefit is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
    Action
    Verify whether incremental shipping was used for standby databases.
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Configuration" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.63% of total activity.
    Finding 5: Buffer Busy
    Impact is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
    A hot data block with concurrent read and write activity was found. The block
    belongs to segment "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" and is block 243489 in file 36.
    Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
    Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
    Action
    Investigate application logic to find the cause of high concurrent read
    and write activity to the data present in this block.
    Related Object
    Database block with object number 37562, file number 36 and block
    number 243489.
    Rationale
    The SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" spent significant time on
    "buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
    UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
    Rationale
    The SQL statement with SQL_ID "326up1aym56dd" spent significant time on
    "buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID 326up1aym56dd.
    UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
    Recommendation 2: Schema Changes
    Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
    Action
    Consider rebuilding the TABLE "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" with object ID 37562
    using a higher value for PCTFREE.
    Related Object
    Database object with ID 37562.
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
    Finding 6: Undersized SGA
    Impact is .38 active sessions, 7.37% of total activity.
    The SGA was inadequately sized, causing additional I/O or hard parses.
    The value of parameter "sga_target" was "4096 M" during the analysis period.
    Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
    Estimated benefit is .12 active sessions, 2.33% of total activity.
    Action
    Increase the size of the SGA by setting the parameter "sga_target" to
    4608 M.
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
    Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.51% of total activity.
    Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
    significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, .03% of total activity.
    Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
    Finding 7: Commits and Rollbacks
    Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
    Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations
    were consuming significant database time.
    Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
    Estimated benefit is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
    Action
    Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O to the
    online redo log files.
    Rationale
    The average size of writes to the online redo log files was 163 K and
    the average time per write was 68 milliseconds.
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
    Finding 8: Undo I/O
    Impact is .18 active sessions, 3.53% of total activity.
    Undo I/O was a significant portion (26%) of the total database I/O.
    No recommendations are available.
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than
    expected.
    Impact is .08 active sessions, 1.46% of total activity.
    Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
    Finding 9: CPU Usage
    Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
    Time spent on the CPU by the instance was responsible for a substantial part
    of database time.
    Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
    Estimated benefit is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
    Finding 10: Top SQL By I/O
    Impact is .11 active sessions, 2.21% of total activity.
    Individual SQL statements responsible for significant user I/O wait were
    found.
    Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
    Estimated benefit is .11 active sessions, 2.22% of total activity.
    Action
    Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5".
    Related Object
    SQL statement with SQL_ID b3pnc5yctv2z5.
    INSERT INTO ZX_TRANSACTION_LINES_GT( APPLICATION_ID ,ENTITY_CODE
    ,EVENT_CLASS_CODE ,TRX_ID ,TRX_LEVEL_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_ID ,LINE_CLASS
    ,LINE_LEVEL_ACTION ,TRX_LINE_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_DATE
    ,LINE_AMT_INCLUDES_TAX_FLAG ,LINE_AMT ,TRX_LINE_QUANTITY ,UNIT_PRICE
    ,PRODUCT_ID ,PRODUCT_ORG_ID ,UOM_CODE ,PRODUCT_CODE ,SHIP_TO_PARTY_ID
    ,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_ID ,BILL_TO_PARTY_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_ID
    ,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID
    ,SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID ,SHIP_FROM_LOCATION_ID ,BILL_TO_LOCATION_ID
    ,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,HISTORICAL_FLAG
    ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CODE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_DATE
    ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_RATE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_TYPE
    ,TRX_LINE_MAU ,TRX_LINE_PRECISION ,HISTORICAL_TAX_CODE_ID
    ,TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION
    ,LINE_INTENDED_USE ,PRODUCT_TYPE ,USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS
    ,ASSESSABLE_VALUE ,INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE ,ACCOUNT_CCID
    ,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,TRX_LINE_NUMBER
    ,TRX_LINE_DESCRIPTION ,PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION ,USER_UPD_DET_FACTORS_FLAG
    ,DEFAULTING_ATTRIBUTE1 ) SELECT :B4 ,:B3 ,:B2
    ,PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID ,:B1 ,PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID ,'INVOICE'
    ,NVL(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE,'UPDATE') ,'ITEM'
    ,NVL(PRL.NEED_BY_DATE, SYSDATE) ,'N' ,NVL(PRL.AMOUNT,
    PRL.UNIT_PRICE*PRL.QUANTITY) ,PRL.QUANTITY ,PRL.UNIT_PRICE
    ,PRL.ITEM_ID ,(SELECT FSP.INVENTORY_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
    FINANCIALS_SYSTEM_PARAMS_ALL FSP WHERE FSP.ORG_ID=PRL.ORG_ID)
    ,(SELECT MUM.UOM_CODE FROM MTL_UNITS_OF_MEASURE MUM WHERE
    MUM.UNIT_OF_MEASURE=PRL.UNIT_MEAS_LOOKUP_CODE) ,MSIB.SEGMENT1
    ,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID ,PV.PARTY_ID ,PRH.ORG_ID
    ,PV.PARTY_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID
    ,PRL.DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID ,(SELECT HZPS.LOCATION_ID FROM
    HZ_PARTY_SITES HZPS WHERE HZPS.PARTY_SITE_ID = PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID)
    ,(SELECT LOCATION_ID FROM HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS WHERE
    ORGANIZATION_ID=PRH.ORG_ID) ,PRL.VENDOR_ID ,PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,NULL
    ,NVL(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, :B9 ) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_DATE,
    SYSDATE) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE, :B8 )
    ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_TYPE, :B7 )
    ,FC.MINIMUM_ACCOUNTABLE_UNIT ,NVL(FC.PRECISION, 2) ,NULL
    ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY, NULL),
    NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_CATEGORY, NULL), NULL )
    ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION,
    NULL), NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.LINE_INTENDED_USE, NULL), NULL )
    ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_TYPE, NULL), NULL )
    ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS, NULL),
    NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.ASSESSABLE_VALUE, NULL), NULL )
    ,DECODE(:B6 , 'REQIMPORT', PRL.TAX_NAME,
    DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
    NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE,
    NULL), NULL ) ) ,NVL((SELECT PRD.CODE_COMBINATION_ID FROM
    PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PRD WHERE PRD.REQUISITION_LINE_ID =
    PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND ROWNUM = 1), MSIB.EXPENSE_ACCOUNT )
    ,PV.VENDOR_ID ,PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,PRL.LINE_NUM ,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION
    ,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION ,(SELECT 'Y' FROM DUAL WHERE :B6 = 'REQIMPORT'
    AND PRL.TAX_NAME IS NOT NULL) ,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
    PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL PRH, PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL PRL,
    ZX_LINES_DET_FACTORS ZXLDET, PO_VENDORS PV, PO_VENDOR_SITES_ALL PVS,
    MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSIB, FND_CURRENCIES FC WHERE
    PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = :B5 AND PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID =
    PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND ZXLDET.APPLICATION_ID(+) = :B4 AND
    ZXLDET.ENTITY_CODE(+) = :B3 AND ZXLDET.EVENT_CLASS_CODE(+) = :B2 AND
    ZXLDET.TRX_LEVEL_TYPE(+) = :B1 AND ZXLDET.TRX_LINE_ID(+) =
    PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID AND PV.VENDOR_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_ID AND
    PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID AND
    MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID(+) = PRL.ITEM_ID AND MSIB.ORGANIZATION_ID(+) =
    PRL.ORG_ID AND FC.CURRENCY_CODE(+) = PRL.CURRENCY_CODE AND
    NVL(PRL.MODIFIED_BY_AGENT_FLAG, 'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CANCEL_FLAG,
    'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') <> 'FINALLY CLOSED' AND
    PRL.LINE_LOCATION_ID IS NULL AND PRL.AT_SOURCING_FLAG IS NULL
    Rationale
    SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5" was executed 3 times and had
    an average elapsed time of 138 seconds.
    Rationale
    Average time spent in User I/O wait events per execution was 137
    seconds.
    Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
    Additional Information
    Miscellaneous Information
    Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
    Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
    Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
    time.
    The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
    period.
    Regards
    Athish

    Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instanceFor production issues, please log a SR.
    Was this working before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
    Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
    Please see these docs.
    AutoInvoice Performance Issue When Processing Tax [ID 1059275.1]
    R12 : System Hangs When Attempting To Save Blanket Release After Applying Patch 11817843 [ID 1333336.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Details about ADDM report

    Hi,
    I have a small 'orcl' database on my local machine, and I did not perform heavy activity on it. Today and yesterday I performed just some simple queries, like:
    SELECT COUNT(*)
    FROM   products p, (SELECT prod_id, AVG(unit_cost) ac FROM costs GROUP BY prod_id) c
    WHERE  p.prod_id = c.prod_id AND
           p.prod_list_price < 1.15 * c.ac;
    or
    select * from products;
    from the 'sh' schema. Today I run a ADDM report, and this is the result:
    ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_557'
    Analysis Period
    AWR snapshot range from 490 to 494.
    Time period starts at 17-JUL-13 11.00.34 PM
    Time period ends at 18-JUL-13 05.31.00 PM
    Analysis Target
    Database 'ORCL' with DB ID 1346555844.
    Database version 11.2.0.3.0.
    ADDM performed an analysis of instance orcl, numbered 1 and hosted at ROGER.
    Activity During the Analysis Period
    Total database time was 499 seconds.
    The average number of active sessions was .01.
    Summary of Findings
       Description                   
    Active Sessions
    Recommendations
    Percent of Activity
    1  I/O Throughput                
    .01 | 100      
    2
    2  Hard Parse                    
    0 | 29.47      
    0
    3  Hard Parse Due to Sharing Criteria  0 | 8.89       
    1
    4  Row Lock Waits                
    0 | 7.37       
    0
    5  PL/SQL Compilation            
    0 | 4.04       
    1
    6  Unusual "User I/O" Wait Event 
    0 | 4.02       
    1
    7  Commits and Rollbacks         
    0 | 3.08       
    1
    8  Shared Pool Latches           
    0 | 2.78       
    0
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Findings and Recommendations
    Finding 1: I/O Throughput
    Impact is .01 active sessions, 100% of total activity.
    The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected.
       Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
       Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 100% of total activity.
       Action
    Consider increasing the throughput of the I/O subsystem. Oracle's
    recommended solution is to stripe all data files using the SAME
    methodology. You might also need to increase the number of disks for
    better performance.
       Rationale
    During the analysis period, the average data files' I/O throughput was
    1.4 K per second for reads and 1 K per second for writes. The average
    response time for single block reads was 18 milliseconds.
       Recommendation 2: Host Configuration
       Estimated benefit is 0 active sessions, 17.55% of total activity.
       Action
    The performance of some data and temp files was significantly worse than
    others. If striping all files using the SAME methodology is not
    possible, consider striping these file over multiple disks.
       Rationale
    For file D:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\ORCL\SYSTEM01.DBF, the average response
    time for single block reads was 168 milliseconds, and the total excess
    I/O wait was 70 seconds.
    Related Object
    Database file
    "D:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\ORCL\SYSTEM01.DBF"
       Rationale
    For file D:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\ORCL\SYSAUX01.DBF, the average response
    time for single block reads was 16 milliseconds, and the total excess
    I/O wait was 16 seconds.
    Related Object
    Database file
    "D:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\ORCL\SYSAUX01.DBF"
       Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 30.87% of total activity.
    Finding 2: Hard Parse
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 29.47% of total activity.
    Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
    Hard parsing SQL statements that encountered parse errors was not consuming
    significant database time.
    Hard parses due to literal usage and cursor invalidation were not consuming
    significant database time.
    The Oracle instance memory (SGA and PGA) was adequately sized.
       No recommendations are available.
    Finding 3: Hard Parse Due to Sharing Criteria
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 8.89% of total activity.
    SQL statements with the same text were not shared because of cursor
    environment mismatch. This resulted in additional hard parses which were
    consuming significant database time.
    Common causes of environment mismatch are session NLS settings, SQL trace
    settings and optimizer parameters.
       Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
       Estimated benefit is 0 active sessions, 8.89% of total activity.
       Action
    Look for top reason for cursor environment mismatch in
    V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR.
       Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 29.47% of total activity.
    Finding 4: Row Lock Waits
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 7.37% of total activity.
    SQL statements were found waiting for row lock waits.
       No recommendations are available.
       Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Application" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 7.78% of total activity.
    Finding 5: PL/SQL Compilation
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 4.04% of total activity.
    PL/SQL compilation consumed significant database time.
       Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
       Estimated benefit is 0 active sessions, 4.04% of total activity.
       Action
    Investigate the appropriateness of PL/SQL compilation. PL/SQL
    compilation can be caused by DDL on dependent objects.
    Finding 6: Unusual "User I/O" Wait Event
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 4.02% of total activity.
    Wait event "Disk file operations I/O" in wait class "User I/O" was consuming
    significant database time.
       Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
       Estimated benefit is 0 active sessions, 4.02% of total activity.
       Action
    Investigate the cause for high "Disk file operations I/O" waits. Refer
    to Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event.
       Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 30.87% of total activity.
    Finding 7: Commits and Rollbacks
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 3.08% of total activity.
    Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations
    were consuming significant database time.
       Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
       Estimated benefit is 0 active sessions, 3.08% of total activity.
       Action
    Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O to the
    online redo log files.
       Rationale
    The average size of writes to the online redo log files was 21 K and the
    average time per write was 7 milliseconds.
       Rationale
    The total I/O throughput on redo log files was 0 K per second for reads
    and 0.7 K per second for writes.
       Rationale
    The redo log I/O throughput was divided as follows: 0% by RMAN and
    recovery, 100% by Log Writer, 0% by Archiver, 0% by Streams AQ and 0% by
    all other activity.
       Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 3.08% of total activity.
    Finding 8: Shared Pool Latches
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 2.78% of total activity.
    Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming significant
    database time.
    Waits for "library cache load lock" amounted to 1% of database time.
    Waits for "latch: shared pool" amounted to 1% of database time.
       No recommendations are available.
       Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
    Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
    Impact is 0 active sessions, 3.12% of total activity.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Additional Information
    Miscellaneous Information
    Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
    CPU was not a bottleneck for the instance.
    Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
    Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
    time.
    The database's maintenance windows were active during 94% of the analysis
    period.
    Being a small local database, my question is: do I really need to do something? For example at Finding 5: PL/SQL Compilation, what I really need to do? Or ar Finding 1: I/O Throughput
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Mainly in ADDM you can consider
    Recommendation
    Estimated benefit
    You have generated the report for ~18 hr time interval.
    for test/local  you can ignore this.

  • Cannot generate AWR/ADDM reports in Oracle 10g

    Hi,
    We are running 10.2.0.3.0 and troublshooted the performance problem for some queries. But when tried to run AWR/ADDM reports from OEM and got the following messages:
    Insufficient Data in Interval. For displaying data on this page, two historical snapshots are needed. Make sure that two snapshots are present in the target database instance. In addition modify the interval so that it is contained within two available snapshots
    I checked the scheduled jobs in this DB,
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, Oracle Label Security and Data Mining options
    SQL> select JOB_NAME from dba_scheduler_jobs;
    JOB_NAME
    PURGE_LOG
    FGR$AUTOPURGE_JOB
    GATHER_STATS_JOB
    AUTO_SPACE_ADVISOR_JOB
    Has anyone anyidea why AWR/ADDM reports cannot be run? Thanks
    Liz

    Hi,
    If you want you can execute snapshot at your required time as suggested by people.
    However Oracle 10g by default take snap at every one hour.
    To check
    select snap_id, to_char(BEGIN_INTERVAL_TIME,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI') BEGIN_INTERVAL_TIME,
    to_char(END_INTERVAL_TIME,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI') END_INTERVAL_TIME
    from dba_hist_snapshot
    You can generate AWR Report by executing following SQL, Connect as SYS
    SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/awrrpt.sql
    Input required details it asks, you can get AWR report in HTML or text format.
    ADDM Report:
    @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/addmrpt.sql

  • Error in generating ADDM Report(Oracle 11g 64 bit EE on linux RHEL 5)

    I collected .dmp file from production using awrextr.sql and imported in our development side using awrload.sql .
    I am able to generate awr snapshots report out of it without any trouble.
    But When I try to generate addm report using addmrpti.sql I am facing following error(Please see output pasted below)
    Specify the Report Name
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The default report file name is addmrpt_1_7149_7156.txt. To use this name,
    press <return> to continue, otherwise enter an alternative.
    Enter value for report_name:
    Using the report name addmrpt_1_7149_7156.txt
    Running the ADDM analysis on the specified pair of snapshots ...
    begin
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-13711: Some snapshots in the range [7149, 7156] are missing key statistics.
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", line 201
    ORA-06512: at line 27
    Generating the ADDM report for this analysis ...
    ERROR:
    ORA-13608: The specified name NULL is invalid.
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.PRVT_ADVISOR", line 3122
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", line 585
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    End of Report
    Report written to addmrpt_1_7149_7156.txt
    SQL>
    Any clue or help will be really helpful for us.

    hello,
    have a look at this'
    ORA-13711:Some snapshots in the range [string, string] are missing key statistics.
    Cause:      Some AWR tables encountered errors while creating one or more
    snapshots in the given range. The data present in one or more of these missing
    tables is necessary to perform an ADDM analysis.
    Action:      Look in DBA_HIST_SNAP_ERROR to find what tables are missing in
    the given snapshot range. Use the ERROR_NUMBER column in that view
    together with the alert log to identify the reason for failure and take necessary action to
    prevent such failures in the future. Try running ADDM on a different snapshot range
    that does not include any incomplete snapshots.thanks and regards
    VD
    Edited by: Dixit on Aug 31, 2009 1:52 AM
    Edited by: Dixit on Aug 31, 2009 1:53 AM

  • Multiple executions of a query found in the ADDM Report

    Hi,
    I generated an ADDM Report on my DB for the time when the DB performance was very slow. Below are some lines from it:
    RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 15% benefit (28820 seconds)
    ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
    "725bgkkhqs73v".
    RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 725bgkkhqs73v and
    PLAN_HASH 2688602638
    select column1,column2 from table1;
    ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "725bgkkhqs73v" for
    possible performance improvements.
    RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 725bgkkhqs73v and
    PLAN_HASH 2688602638
    select column1, column2 from table1;
    RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "725bgkkhqs73v" was executed 32 times and had an average elapsed time of 900 seconds.
    Can anyone help me out with the reason behind these repeated executions of the SQL query thus resulting in a avg elapsed time of 15 mins. Also, I could see that some queries ran on the DB even for 145,445,335 times, however the total time elapsed for executing these queries was only 0.000048 seconds.
    COuld it be because there was exclusive locks on those tables during the times there queries were getting executed or do I need to look at query tuning here? Kindly help.

    yeah. posting it here:
    select column1,column2 from table1;
    Plan hash value: 2688602638
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 4 (100)| |
    | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 77 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| column1 | 1 | 18 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 77 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | column2 | 1 | 59 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | x_abc | 1605 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    SQL_ID 725bgkkhqs73v
    select column1, column2 from table1;
    Plan hash value: 2947532035
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 4 (100)| |
    | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 41 | 1476 | 4 (50)| 00:00:01 |
    | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | column1 | 14 | 252 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 50 | 1800 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| column1 | 3 | 54 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | X_abc| 1602 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    | 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | XAK_def| 14 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Does this shed any light?
    Thanks in advance for all your help!

  • Error trying to generate addmrpt (ADDM Report) on Oracle 10.1.0.4

    Hello,
    When I launch $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/addmrpt.sql on my Fedora 3 Oracle 10g connected using sys as sysdba (or system), I get the following error :
    Specify the Begin and End Snapshot Ids
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Entrez une valeur pour begin_snap : 210
    Begin Snapshot Id specified: 210
    Entrez une valeur pour end_snap : 211
    End Snapshot Id specified: 211
    Specify the Report Name
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The default report file name is addmrpt_1_210_211.txt. To use this name,
    press <return> to continue, otherwise enter an alternative.
    Entrez une valeur pour report_name :
    Using the report name addmrpt_1_210_211.txt
    Running the ADDM analysis on the specified pair of snapshots ...
    begin
    ERREUR a la ligne 1 :
    ORA-13711: Des statistiques de cle sont absentes de certains cliches dans la
    plage [210, 211].
    ORA-06512: a "SYS.PRVT_ADVISOR", ligne 1283
    ORA-06512: a "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", ligne 190
    ORA-06512: a ligne 27
    Generating the ADDM report for this analysis ...
    ERROR:
    ORA-14552: operation DDL, COMMIT ou ROLLBACK interdite dans une instruction DML
    ou une interrogation
    ORA-06512: a "SYS.PRVT_ADVISOR", ligne 1750
    ORA-13608: Le nom de tache ou d'objet NULL n'est pas valide.
    ORA-06512: a "SYS.DBMS_ADVISOR", ligne 569
    ORA-06512: a ligne 1
    Any help to solve this problem ?
    Oups, when I use awrrpt on the same snapshot, I get a correct report.
    Regards,
    Freddy

    Please refer to the patchnote.htm that is bundled with 10.1.0.4.0 patch set. Only you are aware of what type of database configuration you have. You will want to pay close attention to "7.2.1.3 Set the SHARED_POOL_SIZE and JAVA_POOL_SIZE Initialization Parameters" and "7.2.2 Upgrade the Release 10.1 Database".
    Basically, I believe you have missed these required steps after installing the 10.1.0.4.0 patch set from the OUI:
    (pasted from the patchnote.htm)
    13.     Enter the following SQL*Plus commands:
    14.     SQL> STARTUP UPGRADE
    15.     SQL> SPOOL patch.log
    16.     SQL> @ORACLE_BASE\ORACLE_HOME\rdbms\admin\catpatch.sql
    17.     SQL> SPOOL OFF
    18.     
    19.     Review the patch.log file for errors and inspect the list of components that is displayed at the end of catpatch.sql script.
    This list provides the version and status of each SERVER component in the database.
    20.     If necessary, rerun the catpatch.sql script after correcting any problems.
    21.     Restart the database:
    22.     SQL> SHUTDOWN
    23.     SQL> STARTUP
    24.     
    25.     Run the utlrp.sql script to recompile all invalid PL/SQL packages now instead of when the packages are accessed for the first time. This step is optional but recommended.
    26.     SQL> @ORACLE_BASE\ORACLE_HOME\rdbms\admin\utlrp.sql

  • ADDM report not being generated

    I noticed that addm reports are not being generated from last 2 days. So I did the following:
    SQL> exec dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot;
    BEGIN dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot; END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-13516: AWR Operation failed: only a subset of SQL can be issued
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 10
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 33
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    I got above error. I am not sure what that means. I also ran below SQL:
    SQL> select nam.ksppinm name, val.KSPPSTVL, nam.ksppdesc description
    2 from x$ksppi nam, x$ksppsv val
    3 where nam.indx = val.indx and
    4 nam.ksppinm = '_awr_restrict_mode'
    5 order by 1
    6 ;
    awrrestrict_mode
    FALSE
    AWR Restrict Mode
    What could be the reason that the reports are not being generated anymore

    Check Note:308003.1 - AWR Snapshots Not Generating

  • How to use awr and addm reports

    Hi,
    to use awr and addm reports does we should have separate license or oracle server software license is enough.
    which tool do we use to read this awr and addm reports in real time.
    please give your valuable suggestions.
    thank you!

    Seeing as you seem to want to continue the discussion on someone else's old thread rather than your own one
    AWR files in oracle
    If i don't then it is difficult to find the queries thata re related to my application as most of those are the sysqueries, i just need schema specific queries in the SQL ordered by Elapsed Time section. Perhaps you are using the wrong tool?
    A system-level report like AWR or ADDM is no use to you as it seems your application code is not significant at the system level.
    You might want to consider tracing the sessions from your application using client_id or module to identify sessions belonging to your application then possibly use TRCSESS and TKPROF.

  • Query regarding the ADDM Report

    Hi All,
    My DB performance was quite slow during the last weekend because we had a major data load job and dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats jobs running simultaneously. So, we got an ADDM report generated for these 2 days and from that i could extract 2 things:
    1. The performance was slow because the dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats job was running simultaneoulsy on it.
    2. I could see that some of the SELECT queries on the tables in the schema got executed 145445335, 35, 30 and 20 times repeatedly on the DB. Now this leaves me shocked. Can anyone possibly explain the reason behind it? Was it because a gather_schema_stats was also running on the DB? But how would a select be affected by it? Would it be because it had a exclusive locks on those DB objects during the time it was running?
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Thanks for your response.
    No, i cannot see any of the terms like library cache locks and library cache pins with those SQL statements. The only things is see is:
    RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 15% benefit (28820 seconds)
    ACTION: Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID
    "725bgkkhqs73v".
    RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 725bgkkhqs73v and
    PLAN_HASH 2688602638
    SELECT column1 from table1;
    ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "725bgkkhqs73v" for
    possible performance improvements.
    RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 725bgkkhqs73v and
    PLAN_HASH 2688602638
    RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "725bgkkhqs73v" was executed 32
    times and had an average elapsed time of 900 seconds.
    Also, my DB is 10.2.0.3.0 and OS is HP-UNX B.11.23.

  • How to apply recommendations given by addm report

    Hi Gurus
    Actually the addm report of my test database is giving some recommendations and i am not getting ,how to apply those on my database.
    so i am putting some data here,if anybody could give me some hint regarding that it would be of great help as i am new in dba.
    Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations were consuming significant database time. RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 9.9% benefit (147 seconds) ACTION: Investigate application logic for possible reduction in the number of COMMIT operations by increasing the size of transactions. RATIONALE: The application was performing 112 transactions per minute with an average redo size of 3655 bytes per transaction. RECOMMENDATION 2: Host Configuration, 9.9% benefit (147 seconds) ACTION: Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O to the online redo log files. RATIONALE: The average size of writes to the online redo log files was 3 K and the average time per write was 4 milliseconds. SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING: Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time. (9.9% impact [147 seconds]) FINDING 6: 8% impact (119 seconds) ---------------------------------- Wait event "process startup" in wait class "Other" was consuming significant database time. RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 8% benefit (119 seconds) ACTION: Investigate the cause for high "process startup" waits. Refer to Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event. Use given SQL for further investigation. RATIONALE: The SQL statement with SQL_ID "NULL-SQLID" was found waiting for "process startup" wait event. RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID NULL-SQLID RECOMMENDATION 2: Application Analysis, 8% benefit (119 seconds) ACTION: Investigate the cause for high "process startup" waits in Service "SYS$BACKGROUND". FINDING 7: 6.3% impact (93 seconds)
    NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Hard parses due to cursor environment mismatch were not consuming significant database time. Hard parsing SQL statements that encountered parse errors was not consuming significant database time. Parse errors due to inadequately sized shared pool were not consuming significant database time. Hard parsing due to cursors getting aged out of shared pool was not consuming significant database time. Hard parses due to literal usage and cursor invalidation were not consuming significant database time. FINDING 8: 4.3% impact (63 seconds) ----------------------------------- The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected. RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 4.3% benefit (63 seconds) ACTION: Consider increasing the throughput of the I/O subsystem. Oracle's recommended solution is to stripe all data file using the SAME methodology. You might also need to increase the number of disks for better performance. Alternatively, consider using Oracle's Automatic Storage Management solution. SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time. (13% impact [191 seconds]) FINDING 9: 4.1% impact (60 seconds) ----------------------------------- Buffer cache writes due to small log files were consuming significant database time. NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING: The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected. (4.3% impact [63 seconds]) Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time. (13% impact [191 seconds]) FINDING 10: 3.5% impact (51 seconds) ------------------------------------ Wait event "class slave wait" in wait class "Other" was consuming significant database time. RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 3.5% benefit (51 seconds) ACTION: Investigate the cause for high "class slave wait" waits. Refer to Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event. Use given SQL for further investigation. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ---------------------- Wait class "Administrative" was not consuming significant database time. Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time. Wait class "Cluster" was not consuming significant database time. Wait class "Concurrency" was not consuming significant database time. Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time. Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time. Wait class "Scheduler" was not consuming significant database time. The analysis of I/O performance is based on the default assumption that the average read time for one database block is 10000 micro-seconds. An explanation of the terminology used in this report is available when you run the report with the 'ALL' level of detail.
    regards
    Richa

    I'm not sure what about the recommendations you don't understand as what you posted seems quite clear. Take #1 for example:
    Investigate application logic for possible reduction in the number of COMMIT operations by increasing the size of transactions.is telling you that it appears you are doing incremental commits. Are you? Can you change it if you are?
    When you respond please include full version information.

  • ADDM Report is not produced by SQL DEV 4.0 if logged in user does not have SYSDBA privilege

    Hello -
    In SQLDEV 4.0 (Early Adapter), I logged in as user with no SYSDBA privilege granted. But ADVISOR granted and  execute on DBMS_ADDM granted and "select any dictionary" granted, etc.
    Then i go to the menu View --> DBA --> Performance --> Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor
    Select ADDM report from the available choices.
    Out of 3 menu options: Summary, Findings and ADDM Report, I can see the first two, but I am getting a grey screen for ADDM Report.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    If i do exactly the same but login as SYSDBA, then ADDM Report can be produced and can be seen. So the issue is in the missing grants and privileges.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    The goal that we are pursuing in our shop is to empower developers to work with ADDM reports by having them login as non-SYSDBA user.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Please advise what privilege should be granted to get this working for non-SYSDBA login
    The same user can successfully execute $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/addmrpt.sql and produce file with complete ADDM report. But not able to get the ADDM from SQL DEV 4.0
    Thank you,
    vr

    Thank you, Phil.
    This worked for me in my quick test case.
    Great help, as DBA group wants to allow NON-privileged users (like Developers and QA) to execute ADDM on demand.
    Here is my observation for RAC database with two instances.
    I have followed your instructions:
    "Performance / Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor -> Run ADDM"
    Then
    - Uncheck box "By Creating New Snapshot" (this box was checked by default)
    - Provide new "Task Name" (let's say "vr1")
    - Select "Start Snapshot" (this is where my first confusion is: each screen shot # is shown twice, may be because i have two instances of RAC)
    - Select "End Snapshot" (the same way: each SNAP_ID is shown twice)
    - and finally APPLY button is pressed
    This creates 3 reports:
    vr1
    vr1$1 (for instance_id=1)
    vr1$2 (for instance_id=2_
    So, my question is: this expected and normal behavior of the tool?
    What if my RAC database has 8 instances? Then I would generate 9 separate ADDM reports?
    Is this correct observation?
    Thank you,
    vr

  • How to generate addm report using grid

    Hi,
    how to generate addm report using grid, please provide any relevant doc/links etc.
    Thanks in advance.

    how to generate addm report using grid, please provide any relevant doc/links etc.When you start with the wrong question, no matter how good an answer you get, it won't matter very much.
    what is best way to divide board into 2 pieces using a hammer?
    Edited by: sb92075 on Oct 25, 2010 7:22 AM

  • CPU wait events on ADDM report

    Hello,
    My Oracle version is:
    Connected to Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 Yesterday I was taking a look on an ADDM report and spot the following:
       Rationale
          SQL statement with SQL_ID "0mgk8gx9hj71d" was executed 777 times and had
          an average elapsed time of 42 seconds.
       Rationale
          Waiting for event "resmgr:cpu quantum" in wait class "Scheduler"
          accounted for 34% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
          statement with SQL_ID "0mgk8gx9hj71d".After that, I started looking for how ADDM could know that the SQL_ID "0mgk8gx9hj71d" waited 34% on "resmgr:cpu quantum" event. No lucky with that...
    The only wait event information related to a given SQL_ID I've found on v$active_session_history (or the AWR persisted table for it), but in the ASH there is no information about CPU wait events like "cpu quantum". When the session is waiting for CPU, there is no event related in v$ash.
    So, my question is: where ADDM got the information that the SQL waited 34% of the time on "resmgr:cpu quantum"?
    Thanks,
    Heitor Kirsten

    Hi,
    Is a session waiting for CPU resources ("res:cpu quantum") considered as an active session ? Maybe not.
    I guess (I made no test) that this maybe the reason why this kind of wait is not shown in the active session history .
    Regards
    Maurice

  • No automatic ADDM Report

    Hi all,
    I'm a little bit confused and hopefully you can tell me how to solve my issue, if possible.
    I have a 10.2.0.4 Database running on Windows W2K3 64bit.
    The database runs quite fine but since the setup I experienced a "little" problem.
    I think that I remember, from a very previous 10g installation, that the ADDM report were created automatically on interval base to provide suggestions.
    The AWR snapshots are already created in 15 minutes interval, more than 700 snapshots are available and I can run the ADDM report manually.
    Also STATISTICS_LEVEL is set to typical but still ADDM report is not created automatically on interval base.
    Also on the Database Homepage I can also see that "No ADDM Runs available".
    So, does someone has an idea how I can archive that ADDM report is running automatically on regular base?
    Thanks for your help.
    Br
    Joerg

    Hi all,
    so this issue is solved..... I have run again the database upgrade an now everything is fine.
    br
    Joerg

Maybe you are looking for

  • Jca Ftp Adapter - XA support

    Hi, I have requirement to move files between two ftp servers. I have implemented this using OSB services configured with jca ftp adapter. After reading the files from the source system the adapter is configured to delete the file from source director

  • Checking User rights in CMC 3.2 : How to search for a user ?

    Hello, We are in XI 3.2, and the rights applied on Public Folders are based on user groups, not individuals (hopefully). In the CMC, when we want, for support purpose, to check what is the results of these rights for a given user, the "Select" panel

  • MacBook Pro doesn't see my Ipad

    Forgive if this has been posted elsewhere but i looked and could only find Ipod issues. All of a sudden my MacBook doesn't see my Ipad (1st generation). it just worked yesterday and I've done no updates and the cable is in working order. When i plug

  • Drop insert in receiver system with multiple clients

    Hello, does TDMS handle drop-insert technology in a multiple client receiver system automatically? What can be the impact for the other clients when they are working while data deletion in the receiver client? Regards Karlheinz

  • [MBA 2013]sound crashes and restart after a few seconds

    Hi guys, I bought a Macbook Air in June 2013 and 2-3 months ago, I started having problems with the sound. Basically, there is always one of those things running : iTunes, VLC or youtube/soundcloud so I always use the sound. After some time, the soun