Tax code is not picked up while doing ERS with T. Code. MRRL

Hi Experts,
      I have got one Scheduling Agreement of certain material and based on goods receipt quantity user is performing ERS with T. Code MRRL. but when we are seeing different invoice documents generated by ERS with T. Code MIR4 for the same Scheduling Agreement, we are finding in some invoice document(In Basic data tab) didn't pick Tax Code and some invoice documents have picked Tax code.
Following things are already maintained.
1) Scheduling agreement is having tax code maintained.
2) ERS field is ticked in Scheduling agreement
3) Vendor is ticked for ERS
4) GR based IV is ticked in Scheduling agreement
     Can some body suggest why this is happening

Hi.,
have u maintained the info record & tax code in info record for that particular material.
please check it.
Regards,
Satpal

Similar Messages

  • Document type KR is not picking to Clear GL account with T-code F-03

    Hi all,
    My client wants to clear GL account Cash-in-Transit which is open item managed. He has posted two items. One is with KR document type like Intercompnay adjustment account debit (40) and Cash-in-Transit account credit (50). Second item is with SA document type like Cash-in-Transit accont debit (40) and Intercompany adjustment account credit (50). He did not give vendor number and appropriate posting key (31) while postings. With document type KR, he posted with posting keys 40 and 50. Now while clearing the GL account through T-code F-03, system is picking only SA document type. The system is not picking document type KR. He wants to clear the items with each other. I have checked the document type settings. Check boxes Intercompany postings and trading partner are active in both above document types.
    How can the GL account be cleared ? Are any configuration settings missing ? Kindly advice as soon as possible.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    K.S.K

    Hi,
    First of all..why would system need a Exchange gain/Loss Account..If your local currency is INR and you posted a debit and a credit document both in INR..then there is no question of a foreign exchange gain/loss account..
    BUT, if you have posted the document in any currency other than INR, ie: your local currency...then the system would need a exchnage gain/loss account when you try to clear the debits and credits.. i am giving an example below to explain better..
    You posted a debit of 100 USD @ 40 = Rs. 4000.00
    You posted a Credit of 100 USD @ 42 = Rs. 4200.00
    Now, if you clear this debit and credit then there is no difference in 100 USD, as the debit and credit is netting off.. but if you see INR there is a difference of Rs. 200.00 which system posts to Exchange gain/loss account..which we maintain in OB09.
    Hope it is clear to you now..
    Regards,
    SAPFICO.

  • Error ,Field catalog not found while doing billing with DP90

    Dear Guru's
    while doing billing with DP90 transaction code.i have given service order no xxxx and execute.Then i received the below error
    Field catalog not found , Message no. 0K530.Kindly help me in solving the issue.
    Thank u
    S Babu

    hi naga suribabu,
    I am also facing same issue. can you please help, where to  check the configuration for this issue

  • Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

    Hi All,
    I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
    Actual Issue:
    When creating the sales order manually,
    tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
    When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
    We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
    Can anybody solve this issue!
    What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi All,
    Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
    Working:
    When creating the sales order manually,
    tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
    Actual Issue:
    When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
    tax value is not picked .
    I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
    I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
    But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
    I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
    What can be the issue over here!
    Can anybody give me solution for the same!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

  • REG: while doing PGI with ref to OBD should pick stock from one location

    Hi experts ,
    I have a n issue while doing PGI with ref to OBD.
    1.We are purchasing Raw material Aluminium circle 1000 nos from "X" vendor & keeping stock in Main stores i.e 0001 location plant-1.
    2.From there we are issuing to production line i.e 0003 location(Plant 1)500 nos.
    4.Remaining stock of 500 nos is in 0001 location in under some Batches.
    5.Meanwhile we are suppose to transfer the aluminium circle to plant 2 .
    6.For this we are raising STO for aluminium circles  600 nos to Plant 2.
    7.With ref to STO we are raising OBD for Plant 2.
    8.With ref to OBD While doing PGI it should picks the stock from 0001(Main Stores)  location only.
    9.But the STO qty is 600 nos ,availablity of stock in 0001 is 500 nos only .
    10.While PGI  it takes 500 nos from 0001 location & remaining 100 nos picking from Production line 0003.It should not pick from Production line 0003 location .
    11.For this system should not allow to pick from 0003 location & also system should throw error message "Deficit of QTY in 0001 location"for 100 nos.
    KIndly suggest me asap.
    Thanks in advance
    vichu
    Edited by: viswanathan seenuvasan on Dec 10, 2009 7:01 AM

    Hi,
    As I understand the picking is done automatically in outbound delivery. Am I right?
    a)
    If picking is not done automatically but manually, why the user defines the production storage location in the OBD? In this case some training would be necessary....
    b)
    If it is done automatically: which settings are you using? Batch determination only?
    1. In stock determination (SPRO > MM > IM > Stock determination > Define strategies for Stock Determination) you can define which storsage location should be used by system, and you can assign the stock determination rule to the applications (SPRO > MM > IM > Stock determination > Assign Stock determination Rule in the Applications)
    (you also have to assign the stock determination group to the material master (MARC-EPRIO))
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/d8/2f3746996611d1b5480000e82de955/frameset.htm
    2. You have to use batch determination
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/25/283aac4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
    3. You have to use availability check in delivery not to ship out goods for which reservation already exists (if goods are in production storage location I assume you have a PrdOrd...)
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/93/744cd9546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
    I haven't tries this but I assume it should work...
    Please check SAP online help.
    Regards,
    Csaba
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 1, 2010 11:02 AM
    Forget stock determination. Instead of it you should use picking location determination - suggested by Laksmipathi. It wokrks fine with batch determination.
    SPRO > LE > Shipping > Picking > Determine Picking Location > Assign Picking Location
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 1, 2010 5:03 PM

  • While doing MIRO with unplaned cost system is picking  accurel G/L account

    Dear All,
    While doing MIRO with unplaned delivery cost system is picking accural G/L account rather than cost element from PO.
    Thanks
    KMR

    Hi,
       It depeneds how the Unplanned Delivery Cost has been configured for the comany code.
    SPRO>Material Management>LIV>Incoming Invoice>Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost.
    Against Comapny Code put blank if : Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoice items ( here the Materil account or the Account in the PO will be used. )
    Put     2 if : Unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate general ledger   account  ( here the posting key UPF will be used to determine the g/l account ).
    Thanks and Regards

  • Delivery note of 105 while doing MIRO

    Hello,
    We follow 103 & 105 movement type while doing MIGO (103 for initial gate entry and 105 for final store entry).
    But when we go for MIRO, as a reference document (Delivery Note), it shows document generated at the time of 103 entry.
    And while doing MIRO with delivery note of Movement type 105, system does not show any line items to be invoiced.
    Can anyone let me know, why system is not picking the delivery note for 105 and picking the delivery note for 103.
    Thanks
    Prabhjot Singh

    Hi,
    why do you want reference materials from different po during miro then?
    Silas
    Edited by: Silas Ngcobo on Mar 31, 2011 12:18 PM

  • Breakpoint in example.jsp not stopping there while doing remote debuggig

    if i put breakpoint in example.jsp is not stopping there while doing remote debugging.
    i have deployed my jsp in oc4j standalone app server-9.0.4.
    c:\oc4j\j2ee\home\applications\bank\example.jsp
    i have imported this jsp file in c:\jdeveloper9.0.5\jdev\mywork\workspace\JSP\example.jsp
    which path should i set in java source directory and HTML directory in InputPaths of jdeveloper properies.
    remote debuging works well for EJB's and servlets.
    Is there any white paper published for doing remote debuging.
    i searched but i didnt find anywhere.

    i got it

  • Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP

    Dear team,
    While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Dear Sir,
    What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after  given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • Tax Rate is not picking in SD flow

    Hi,
    I have maintained the Tax code and Tax Jurisdiction Code in FTXP.But the system is not picking the Tax Rates in Sales Order
    What could be the reason for this.Kindly help me in fix this issue. I am getting the below error while releasing the Billing document in VF02.
    Why it is giving the below error even though i have maintained FTXP tax rates in with Tax code and Tax jurisdiction code
    Tax code  in procedure TAXUSJ is invalid
    Message no. FICORE704
    Diagnosis
    The tax code entered is not defined in the country for this company code.
    System response
    Procedure
    Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    1. Check whether the required tax determination procedure is assigned to the relevant country. the Procedure field is in the detail screen.
    2. Create a new tax code if required.
    Thanks
    SAP GURU

    ASSIGN TAX CODES FOR NON TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS
    PATH: SPRO  FINANCIAL ACCTG  FINANCIAL ACCTG GLOBAL      SETTINGS  TAX ON SALES/PURCHASE  POSTING  ASSIGN      TAX CODES FOR NON TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS
    TRANSACTION CODE     -     OBCL
    SELECT POSITION BUTTON
    GIVE YOUR COMPANY CODE          -     GES
    PRESS ENTER
    COMPANY CODE          -     GES
    ASSIGN INPUT TAX      -     V0
         OUT PUT TAX     -     A0
     SAVE & SAVE IN YOUR REQUEST

  • With holding line items are not picking up while clearing with F-44 (DP)

    Hi Friends,
    I hope you resolve my problem.
    I have a problem with With holding tax line items. Please see below for more details.
    1. Made advance payment to Vendors through F-48
    Vendor a/c dr 200,000
        To Bank a/c 196000
        To TDS a/c      4000
    2. Raised Vendor invoice through F-43
    Expence a/c dr    50000
        To Vendor a/c    49000
        To TDS Payable   1000
    3. Cleared Vendor invoice against the Down payment
    39A Vendor a/c dr 50000
    26 Vendor a/c 49000
    40 TDS Payable 1000
    While i am tryi ng to do the above invoice with WHT clearing, the system is saying that " With holding tax information is ignored"
    The entry while clearing Vendor DP is
    37 Vendor   a/c  dr 49000
    27  Vendor a/c   49000
    I have every seeting in the system
    1. Tax types, codes, Vendor master, FSG, FBKP, and posting key settings. All are looking fine
    Please help me how to clear the WHT automatically without manual intervention.
    Kindly correct me where ever u see mistakes
    Thank you so much for your advance help
    Regards,
    Narasim

    Hello Ray,
    I am very happy that some have taken tthe responsilibility of answering my query.
    When i do the F-54, I am able to clear the vendor invoice against with the down payment. But if i go and see the WHT in respective GL account, they are still showing as " Open".
    Please help me how to resolve it.
    If this is not the correct way, kindly suggest me the right way.
    Thanks for all your help
    Regards,
    Narasim

  • Blu-ray Object: "Sept-Nov_2008", Error: "invalid format", Code: "14", Note: "ERROR: This stream does

    I am trying to transcode a self contained FCP quicktime movie file and I get the message - Blu-ray Object: "Sept-Nov_2008", Error: "invalid format", Code: "14",
    Note: "ERROR: This stream doesn't include Picture timing SEI, Unit Offset = 785835706". I am going to use quicktime pro 7 to import  a quicktime movie instead of FCP self contained file into encore. But if anybody has any suggestions, please let me know. I have read about wrong field orders but I am using a custom preset with the field order set to upper (odd) - since I am using a Apple ProRes 422 (proxy) for the FCP sequence.

    This thread might be helpful:
    http://adobe.hosted.jivesoftware.com/message/3460426
    -Ramesh

  • Error while doing confirmation with cor6

    Dear PP gurus,
    I am getting following error while doing confirmation. please suggest.
    "Error while importing from memory QAPO SAPLQEEV
    0400000363"
    Thanks in advance
    Kailash T.

    Hi,
    The structure QAPO relates to Inspection operation records & the program - SAPLQEEV relates to Spec. tables for results recording. Hence would suggest to discuss this with your QM personnel.
    Also was able to find a link which had a same issue, but no solution posted, have a look if it helps in anyway
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=173200
    Also refer to OSS note - 334400. If all the above does not resolve the issue, raise an OSS message with SAP.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Error while doing commit with UnitOfWork

    Hi all,
    I get the following error while trying to do a commit with Unit of Work:
    I'm trying to Insert a Row into the table here.
    EXCEPTION DESCRIPTION: java.sql.SQLException: DSRA9350E: Operation Connection.commit is not allowed during a global transaction.
    INTERNAL EXCEPTION: java.sql.SQLException: DSRA9350E: Operation Connection.commit is not allowed during a global transaction.
    ERROR CODE: 0LOCAL EXCEPTION STACK:
    EXCEPTION [TOPLINK-4002] (TopLink - 9.0.3 (Build 423)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.DatabaseException
    EXCEPTION DESCRIPTION: java.sql.SQLException: DSRA9350E: Operation Connection.commit is not allowed during a global transaction.
    INTERNAL EXCEPTION: java.sql.SQLException: DSRA9350E: Operation Connection.commit is not allowed during a global transaction.
    ERROR CODE: 0
         at oracle.toplink.exceptions.DatabaseException.sqlException(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.commitTransaction(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.basicCommitTransaction(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.threetier.ClientSession.basicCommitTransaction(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.commitTransaction(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commitTransaction(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commitToDatabase(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commitRootUnitOfWork(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commit(Unknown Source)

    Are you trying to make use of TopLink's JTS integration for the UnitOfWork?
    How are you acquiring the UOW in code?
    non-JTS, make sure to use session.acquireUnitOfWork()
    for JTS, session.getActiveUnitOfWork() and never call uow.commit() since TXs are method based in an EJB.
    Also, for JTS - ensure you tell TopLink's session you are using an external TX controller in the sessions.xml, just consult the examples that install with TopLink for a sessions.xml that makes use of external TXs.
    Darren

  • While doing scd2 with ikm oracle slowly changing get this error plz help me

    ODI-1217: Session INT_EMP1_SCD2 (574001) fails with return code 936.
    ODI-1226: Step INT_EMP1_SCD2 fails after 1 attempt(s).
    ODI-1240: Flow INT_EMP1_SCD2 fails while performing a Integration operation. This flow loads target table ODI_EMP1_SCD2_TGT.
    ODI-1228: Task INT_EMP1_SCD2 (Integration) fails on the target ORACLE connection DS_DEV_TGT.
    Caused By: java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00936: missing expression
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:462)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:405)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.processError(T4C8Oall.java:931)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.receive(T4CTTIfun.java:481)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.doRPC(T4CTTIfun.java:205)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.doOALL(T4C8Oall.java:548)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:217)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForRows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:1115)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1488)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3769)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.execute(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3954)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.execute(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1539)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.execution.sql.SQLCommand.execute(SQLCommand.java:163)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.execution.sql.SQLExecutor.execute(SQLExecutor.java:102)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.execution.sql.SQLExecutor.execute(SQLExecutor.java:1)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.execution.TaskExecutionHandler.handleTask(TaskExecutionHandler.java:50)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessTaskSql.processTask(SnpSessTaskSql.java:2913)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessTaskSql.treatTask(SnpSessTaskSql.java:2625)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessStep.treatAttachedTasks(SnpSessStep.java:558)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessStep.treatSessStep(SnpSessStep.java:464)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSession.treatSession(SnpSession.java:2093)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.processor.impl.StartSessRequestProcessor$2.doAction(StartSessRequestProcessor.java:366)
         at oracle.odi.core.persistence.dwgobject.DwgObjectTemplate.execute(DwgObjectTemplate.java:216)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.processor.impl.StartSessRequestProcessor.doProcessStartSessTask(StartSessRequestProcessor.java:300)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.processor.impl.StartSessRequestProcessor.access$0(StartSessRequestProcessor.java:292)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.processor.impl.StartSessRequestProcessor$StartSessTask.doExecute(StartSessRequestProcessor.java:855)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.processor.task.AgentTask.execute(AgentTask.java:126)
         at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.support.DefaultAgentTaskExecutor$2.run(DefaultAgentTaskExecutor.java:82)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)

    Hi Cnu
    Let me work through an example. A table named EMPLOYEE may have a natural key of EMPLOYEE_ID. When loading this table as a target in ODI, you will need to define the key that will be used by the KM for Updates and Deletes. This key will be defined on the Datastore as a constraint.
    If you expand the Model, expand the EMPLOYEE Datastore, you will find the Constraints section under the Datastore. Create a new constraint. In the case of an SCD integration type, you should have a surrogate key as well as the natural key. EMPLOYEE_ID, being the natural key for EMPLOYEE, would most likely need to be setup as an Alternate Key constraint. So, set the constraint type as such and add the column EMPLOYEE_ID to the list of key columns. Save the constraint.
    Open the Interface that loads the EMPLOYEE table, click on the Target Datastore (EMPLOYEE), and in the Property Inspector you should find a property named Update Key. This dropdown will list all of the available constraints from the Target Datastore. You will want to choose the constraint that the Interface will use to perform updates and deletes on in the Target (depending on your KM). In this case, the Alternate Key constraint setup based on the EMPLOYEE_ID should be chosen.
    A long answer, but I hope it explains it well for you.
    Regards,
    Michael Rainey

Maybe you are looking for

  • Production Order BOM with Variant Configurable Material

    Hi, I have a requirement to process the document items in the Production Order BOM for a variant configurable martial. I am not sure which Function Module will do this purpose. I checked the FM: CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 and does not seem to be working. Can

  • What is the permission to restrict end user to use Report builder

    Hi experts,  What is the permission to restrict send user to user report builder in SSRS? Thanks

  • BLAREL IDOC is failing to post in SRM

    Folks, We are trying to update the Release Orders from backend PO into the SRM GOA. From the sourcing in SRM we create a GOA and distribute the GOA to backend system. After distribution a contract is created in the backend system. In the backend from

  • Error when installing Incredibles game on Snow Leopard

    Have the Incredibles game for the kids... Trying to install on the new iMac 27 incher... Getting the following error/message. Initializing InstallShield Wizard... Searching for Java(tm) Virtual Machine... ..........A suitable JVM could not be found.

  • Information about objects

    Hi, In analisy, I verified that the BI database is growing very fast. I need to do a data cleaning and I would like to know if there is a s_tcode where I can to see where is localized the most data, in wich object (COPA, PSA, ... ) is concentrate the