Tax relief - Bad debt write off

Hi all,
For a customer with bad debt, it appears standard practice is to use a journal entry to write the debt off to a "Bad Debt" GL account, and then manually reconcile BP balance to zero.
However, the VAT(consumption tax) for the written off amount will still be showing as owed to the government, and will still appear in the TAX report.
In the UK as in other countries, I assume there is relief on bad debt, so the VAT(consumption tax) needs to be written off as well. The only correct way I can think of doing this at the moment is doing a service type credit note with matching tax code of the original invoice specifying the bad debt GL account. In this way, the VAT will also be reversed.
Can anyone advise what method they use, or if there is a proper methodology to do this?
Thanks,
Raj

Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the reply. So as an example, am I correct in thinking the below is the "correct way" to do a write off (if we wanted to avoid doing journal entries):
AR INVOICE - Item Type
Item A x 1 @GBP100.00
VAT/TAX @GBP17.50
-->
AR CREDIT NOTE - Service Type
Bad Debt Write Off     xxxxxxxxxx (GL a/c no)    @GBP100.00
VAT/TAX @GBP17.50 (assuming we specify identical tax code)
-->
Internal reconciliation to zero
Thanks,
Raj

Similar Messages

  • Dispute Case - Write-off entry

    Dear Experts,
    When we write off any invoice through UDM_AUTOWRITEOFF in FSCM, system Debits the Bad debts write off (P&L) A/c and Credits the Customer A/c. However, we want system to segregate VAT, Tax and Freight amount from Bad debts write off A/c. So that the entry would be VAT -Dr. Tax-Dr. Freight -Dr. Bad debts -Dr. and Customer -Cr. Please could you through some light on How to achieve this?
    Thank you.
    With Kind Regards,
    Naresh B. Pandya

    HI Naresh,
    To my understanding there is no configuration in FSCM by which you can achieve what you have stated, since we want to achieve something in FI area by doing an acitivity in FSCM, whereas vice-versa would probably work. I can possibly think of a work around. You can post a normal write-off entry giving the tax code therein, which will clear customer open item, and post to tax GL as well. Now, since the open item (document) which was "disputed object" in FSCM - Dispute case, that object will get updated with resolved object as the new document posted. Basically, the dispute case attribute will reflect the changes that has occurred in FI (FI-FSCM integration). However, I'm not sure whether this amount will get updated in field "paid amount" or "written off" amount. You can simulate and check out.
    I am also interested to know how you deal with this, so keep me posted.
    regards,
    TV.

  • Dispute Case write off to CO-PA

    Hi Experts
    I have an requirement, when writing off dispute case, for some reason code we need the write off to go to CO-PA. Could you please suggest how this can be done. I have tried the user exit, FDM_AR_DISP_WRITEOFF, but not sure how to start with. There is a field additional criterion in general ledger account folder where I specify the case type, reason,...... not sure what to fill in this field, this field is related to the badi.
    Can somebody provide me some directions, please.
    Thanks you in advance
    Jen

    Hi,
    So basically you need to information from the invoice right? If so, when you write off your open receivable you can have the system look at the original posting. Retrieve the information from there (and that could be many lines since you retrieve that info from the invoice) and post to the P&L with the relevant COPA information from the invoice and to the correct P&L account for Bad Debt Write off. This then can also be many lines depending on the COPA information on the invoice lines.
    Regards,
    Richard

  • Impact of Sales Write off amounts on Tax liability

    Hi Friends ,
                       Did any of you had tis situation at your client ? I want to know the impact of tax liabilitry on sales write off amounts  , will it reduce the tax liability if sales write off amounts or in other words the bad debts are considered for tax calcualtion. Any inputs greatly accepted,
    thank you ,

    I am trying to post the tax portion to the tax liability account during write-off in IS-U FICA. Is there a way I can post the tax portion on the invoice to the tax liability account instead of posting the entire amount to the expense account? Any help is highly appreciated.

  • Write off bad debt customers

    Hello
    Is there any workflow template for the following:
    Credit controller proposes an amount to written of on customer open items.
    Depending on amount the authorised person is looked up in an authorisation matrix (table)
    This person gets a message in his inbox/mailbox with the request to approve the write off.
    After approval the journal posting of the write off is made.

    Hi,
    If the table is BKPF then the object is BKPF, FIPP or similar. If you look in transaction SWO2 and find object BKPF it is under the area "Financial Accounting". If you then goto PFTC and enter Workflow Template for Task Type and then F4 on Task and select Structure search, goto the area Financial Accounting and you will see all the workflow templates available.
    Regards,
    Eddie

  • FP04 : Write off and debiting Tax accounts

    Dear All,
    I have an issue with debiting tax account on write off.
    Scenario: Invoice posted $1000 including tax of $100.  i.e $900 consumption (revenue) + $100 tax.
    GL Postings:
    Customer account 1000 Dr
    Revenue Account   900 Cr
    Sales tax                 100 Cr.
    Write off( FP04  any reason codes).
    System posts the Following:
    Customer account 1000 Cr
    Expense Account  1000 Dr
    I need it to be like:
    Customer account 1000 Cr
    Expense Account   900 Dr
    Sales tax                 100 Dr.
    I've tried everything I can, but I think I'm missing something very obvious and silly.
    1) Maintained posting areas:
    0120 : Expense Account (No tax code specified and tried with tax code too)
    0121 : Expense Account for non tax related items (same expense account)
    0122 : Tax Adjustment Flag (Tested with both flag on and off)
    2) Define Act Assignments ReLU to Main Transactions
    Company     Division     Act Deter        Main       Acct
    1000     10          01-10               0090       Expense account
    1000     10          01-10               0095       Expense account
    3) ISU u2013 Define Acct Assignment Relv to Transactions
    Set Main receivable account (Customer account) for all combination  of 0090 and 0095. i.e. 0010 and 0020.
    Company     Division     Act Deter              Main/Sub      Acct
    So what am I doing wrong?
    Thank you very much.
    Edited by: JayUtility on Jan 31, 2012 2:53 PM

    Thank you Ivor. Tried that too.
    I'm still stuck at:
    Customer (AR) Account 1000 Cr
    Expense           Account 1000  Dr
    The entire invoice amount is debiting against the Expense / bad debt account.
    I need that only the consumption portion should debit Expense account and the Tax portion should debit the Tax account.
    Customer account  1000 Cr
    Expense Account    900 Dr
    Sales tax                 100 Dr.
    It seems like an easy enough thing. I must be missing something.

  • Project Billing "write-off" options

    I'm attempting to determine the best method of "writing off" transactions on direct projects that have been reported as billable, accrued revenue but will never be billed. Please consider the following narrative as an example:
    A consultant (consultant x) charges April time and expense to project 10001 in a billable capacity (charged transactions to a billable task). The transactions are cost distributed, revenue distributed and an invoice is subsequently produced. All cost and revenue transactions are produced, interfaced and ultimately posted to the general ledger in April. The month of April is closed in PA and the invoices for the April billing cycle are produced. Project 10001's draft invoice includes those charges reported by consultant x and is distributed to the project manager for approval. The project manager reviews the invoice review and determines that consultant x's transactions will never be billed and instructs the accounting group to write off the transactions.
    Challenge: we need a way to "write-off" (reduce revenue and change billing status) transactions that will allow for consistent reporting and measurement. Specifically, we need to be able to determine all write-off's (revenue/billing reductions) in a given period that relate to original transactions from an earlier or different period. In short, we want to establish a policy and procedure for consistently processing and reporting these types of conditions.
    Proposed Options:
    1) use the "special" non-billable adjustment option from either expenditure inquiry or invoice review to change the billing status from billable to non-billable.
    Pros:
    a) transactions will remain on the project in the capacity they were reported by the employee
    b) an adjustment record will be created in the PA_Expend_Item_adj_Activities table which will include the adjustment activity code (i.e. Billable Reclass, Non-billable reclass, billing hold, billing hold release, etc.)
    c) history of who created original transactions and adjustments is available (full audit trail)
    d) a reversing revenue entry will be created in the PA_Cust_Rev_Dist_Lines_all table which will allow us to track the dates (gl period) of the revenue adjustment and compare it to the original transaction dates.
    Cons:
    a) to the average users the transaction on a billable task flagged as non-billable with no corresponding revenue may look unusual because there is no description explaining why the adjustment existed. the only way to determine that revenue existed and was subsequently reversed is to look at item details- revenue details.
    b)The revenue write-off will be charged to the same accounts (revenue and inventory) that the original transaction was booked to but in reverse. we don't have the ability to deflect the "write-off" to a bad debt account versus a direct write-off of revenue.
    c) The employee's utilization calculations will be impacted by changing the billing status of the transactions and reducing the corresponding revenue. we may need to update the utilization report to reflect these types of transactions differently.
    2) use the "special" transfer adjustment option to transfer the transaction from the originating billable task to a non-billable destination task on the project in question.
    Pros:
    a) the average user will easily see that the transaction in question has been reversed and b) the revenue subsequently written off by the negative revenue on the reversal transaction
    c) an adjustment record will be created in the PA_Expend_Item_adj_activities table which will include the applicable adjustment activity code(s) (Transfer Back-out, Transfer Originating, Transfer Destination).
    d) history of who created original and adjustments is available.
    a reversing revenue entry will be made via e) the negative reversal entry created in the PA_Cust_Rev_Dist_Lines_All table.
    Cons:
    a) the original transaction is being altered (transferred) by accounting. the integrity of the transaction as it was submitted by the source employee may be compromised.
    b) there is no easy way for the average end user to know where the transaction was transferred to. the information is available via ad hoc reporting from database tables but looking at expenditure inquiry for a given project you will not be able to determine where the transaction went if it was transferred to another task and many tasks exist or if it was transferred to another project entirely.
    c) The revenue write-off will be charged to the same accounts (revenue and inventory) that the original transaction was booked to but in reverse. we don't have the ability to deflect the "write-off" to a bad debt account versus a direct write-off of revenue.
    d) The employee's utilization calculations will be impacted by changing the billing status of the transactions and reducing the corresponding revenue. we may need to update the utilization report to reflect these types of transactions differently.
    e) As a common practice, each project will need at least one "non-billable" task to capture such write-off transfers.
    3) use a write-off event (both revenue and billing) to reduce the project by the aggregate amount of all transactions in question.
    Pros:
    a) employee specific transactions and ultimately utilization results will not be impacted by the independent event transaction.
    b) by modifying our autoaccounting rules we will be able to book the "write-off" to an account other than a revenue account. (I believe, more research necessary)
    Cons:
    a) No link back to actual transactions.
    b) original transactions will remain untouched and will appear as though they were billed and will show up on the invoice and detail reports to the client along with an aggregated event for the total write-off amount.
    Any thoughts or opinions you can provide about the best practice in Oracle will be greatly appreciated.
    null

    Diana,
    Here's another response from a (very) senior Projects consultant. Her comments are in CAPS, so they can be dinstinguished from your comments:
    "I recommend following the approach she outlines in Section 2, with the following additions:
    SECTION 2) use the "special" transfer adjustment option to transfer the Transaction from the originating billable task to a non-billable Destination task on the project in question. CORRECT.
    A) SET UP THE WBS TO HAVE A TOP LEVEL NON-BILLABLE TASK, ON EVERY PROJECT, WITH A TASK NUMBER OF :"WRITE-OFF".
    B) WRITE AUTOACCOUNTING RULE , BASED ON TASK NUMBER, TO ENSURE THAT ANY TRANSACTIONS CHARGED (TRANSFERRED) TO "WRITE-OFF" TASK WILL BE POSTED TO A "WRITE-OFF/BAD DEBT" ACCT IN GENERAL LEDGER.
    C) CREATE A DFF AT THE EXPENDITURE ITEM LEVEL WHICH CAN BE POPULATED AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER, TO INDICATE WHERE THE TRX IS BEING TRANSFERRED TO. IT IS TRUE THAT TRANSFER ACTIVITY REPORT WILL TELL YOU THIS AS WELL, BUT IF YOU
    WANT TO SEE IT ONLINE DURING EXPEND. INQ, THEN DFF IS FINE.
    D) AS TO CONCERNS ABOUT "THE INTEGRITY" OF THE TRANSACTION AS IT IS SUBMITTED BY THE EMPLOYEE BEING COMPROMISED, THIS IS CERTAINLY POSSIBLE, BUT IF THIS IS A SERIOUS BUSINESS CONCERN, THEN I WOULD CONSIDER CREATING AN ALERT TO THE EMPLOYEE WHO ENTERED THE ORIGINAL TRX, ADVISING THEM OF THE CHANGE AND REQUESTING THEIR REVIEW AND OR APPROVAL OF THE TRANSFERRED TRX. I CAN SEE THIS BECOMING QUITE CUMBERSOME THOUGH, AND, OVERALL, ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENTS MANIPULATE TRANSACTIONS FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ALL THE TIME AS STANDARD PRACTICE, SO I'M NOT SURE WHY THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE.
    E) AND LASTLY, IT IS TRUE THAT AS A COMMON PRACTICE, EACH PROJECT WILL NEED A
    'WRITE-OFF" TASK AS A STANDARD PART OF IT'S WBS-- SO WHAT? IT'S JUST ONE MORE TASK IN YOUR WBS. BUILD IT INTO YOUR PROJECT TEMPLATES, AND MAKE IT NOT CHARGEABLE UNTIL WRITE OFFS BECOME NECESSARY. AS TO UTILIZATION, THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFO IN THE CLIENT QUESTION TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE PROPERLY.
    THAT'S ABOUT IT. HOPE THIS HELPS.
    BEST REGARDS, PAT"
    null

  • Write Off Process

    Can anyone help me telling 'How Write off process with Tcode happens in FICA'. FP04 Tcode using for write off. What are the impact for this in CA, And how it displays in history.

    Hi,
    Please refer to the following documentation in help.sap.com-
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_utilities472/helpdata/en/14/08723521faee41e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
    There is no SAP standard process that triggers any change in the standard fields in the contract account level for a write-off.
    However, from accounting point of view the following entries gets posted-
    Bad debt A/c Dr
    To Customer A/c.
    Thanks
    Amlan

  • Write off

    Ability to offset auto write off.
    We need to see if a write-off payment comes back from the patient say after a year.  If customer pays back after write off is done. we want to reverse write off.
    Thanks
    Nik

    Configuration is available only for creating reserve for bad debts, probably this is more a common across the industry. This is done through OB04 and OBXD. There is nothing specific for writebacks. Only thing you may want to ensure it if you set the config for reserve for bad debts, make that GL account also to Supplement auto posting. Whe you receive the money back from the written off customer, the bank statement import would probably post to the customer account 'on account". You can use F-30, 'transfer with clearing' transaction to remove the credit from the customer and credit the provision account.

  • Write offs in AR

    is there any configuration needed to do write offs? what is the transaction used to to write off in SAP FI? If it is f-32, then do we jsut process it because when i doit, i have to ener the debit and credit side 40 and 50 and the respective accoutns for it. do I have to maintain special g/l indicator for this or we can do write offs without special gl indicator?
    is bad debts different from write offs. if yes, how are they different and what is configuraion needed for them?

    you need to use t code F-30.
    You need the radio buttion "transfer posting with clearing"
    You do need to use special G/L indicators.
    You also need to use postnig keys "19" and "09"
    Your special G/L will link to a different recon account, and you therefore move the customer debt from 1 standard recon account, to your doubtful debt GL account.

  • IS-Telecommunication RMCA - FI-CA Write offs

    Dear All,
    This is related to IS-Telecommunication. FI-CA
    Scenario: Invoice has been posted with 1121 $ including tax of 121. It means..
    Customer account    1121  Dr
    Revenue Account 1000 Cr
    VAT on sales 121 Cr.
    When I am trying to do the write off(FP04 by using reason codes). System is posting the document as below:
    VAT on sales account 121 Dr
    Expense account   1000 Dr
       To Customer Account 1121.
    I would like to transfer the total amount to the expense account instead of transfer to VAT account, if I use some specific reason codes (Like Bankruptcy).
    Expected account entry:
    Expense account 1121
    to Customer account 1121.
    I found there is a event 5070 (Write-off: Tax Special Features ) in order to meet the above requirement.
    If any one knows about the requirement and solution. Please advise.
    Thanks in advance
    Ravi

    HI Ravi,
    path is
    SPRO > Financial Accounting > contract A/R A/P > Basic functions > particular aspects of taxation procedure > tax adjustment for write offs
    or
    Tcode
    FQZ04T
    or
    FQC0 and type the posting area .
    thanks,
    VR

  • Asset write off in the current fiscal year.

    Hi Experts,
    I want to write off an asset in next 4 periods of the current fiscal year 2007. For example:
    Asset 11000
    APC value: 10000
    APC Date: 01.01.2005
    The useful life will end in fiscal year 2008.
    The book value left at the begining of the current fiscal year 2007 Rs. 4000.00
    In the current fiscal year this asset has already been depreciated for previuos 3 periods.
    Now Business wants to write off ( fully depreciated ) this asset in next 4 periods equally and then if the book value and tax value is nil, they want to scap the asset.
    Now can you please tell me how to make this happened. Its very urgent. If you need any more information, most welcome.
    Rgds,
    BABA

    Hi,
        You would have to set the asset to manual depreciation(Depr.Key MANU)
    and generate a posting via ABMA for each of the periods.
    Kind regards

  • Lockbox write-offs and reson codes

    Hi
    I have been looking at implementing reason codes to apply different gl's for automatic write-off for vendor and customer payments.     The tolerances are set and the reason codes and gl's are set,  however we want to apply this change for lockbox processing as well.  The file we are using is BAI2 and I have been advised that we can get a reason code added by the bank to process these write-off's automatically,  however I am looking at the file format and I can't work out which field on the file relates to the reason code,  I am not sure the format I have is correct.    Can some one please advise the correct BAI2 format and which field should hold the reason code.  Also if I then I manage to add a reason code is this the correct approach for differences with lock-box
    thanks.

    HI Ravi,
    path is
    SPRO > Financial Accounting > contract A/R A/P > Basic functions > particular aspects of taxation procedure > tax adjustment for write offs
    or
    Tcode
    FQZ04T
    or
    FQC0 and type the posting area .
    thanks,
    VR

  • Write Off in IS-U

    Hi Experts,
    When write off is carried out, the entire amount of invoice is written off or partial based on our selection(Full/Partial).
    The new requirement is
    While write off, the tax amount should be posted to its own tax account instead of going to write off account.
    i.e only the net invoice amount should go to write off account and tax amount should goto tax account only(if tax is credited in invoice, while write off, tax needs to be debited to tax account & vice versa)
    Your valauable suggestions are appreciated.
    Please forward any config document for the same.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Krishna,
    Your requirement is possible.
    You need to assign the relevant tax code in EK02 against the write-off main\sub combination.
    You also need to maintain the tax code aginst each combiantion of company code\write-off reason\division in posting area 0120.
    Hope it helps
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • Unable to process write off

    I am trying to write off a final billing item using FP04. It is giving me the error "tax amount in item 0036 is larger that the tax base amount"
    Any help is appreciated....
    Thanks,
    bhargavi

    Hi Bhargavi,
    The error message (msg class->0, msg no.-533) that you are getting is triggerred from a standard FM FKK_FKKOPK_COMPLETE_CHECK, which is called during the Write-off (FP04) via another standard FM-FKK_WRITEOFF.
    The error is happeneing because either of the follwing conditions is getting fulfilled for the particular line item (DFKKOPK_OPUPK)
          IF   DFKKOPK-BETRW > DFKKOPK-SBASW AND DFKKOPK-SBASW > 0
          OR DFKKOPK-BETRW < DFKKOPK-SBASW AND DFKKOPK-SBASW < 0
          OR DFKKOPK-BETRH > DFKKOPK-SBASH AND DFKKOPK-SBASH > 0
          OR DFKKOPK-BETRH < DFKKOPK-SBASH AND DFKKOPK-SBASH < 0. 
    I think there is some discrepancy in the generation of the invoice. as because this error would have come during the generation of the invoice itself.Please check the SAP note no.599558 for reference.
    Also check the SAP notes 1303245 and 914087 in relation to the error.
    Hope it Helps.....
    Thanks,
    Amlan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't send email from my Ipad

    Before today,  I could send/receive emails on my verizon account on my Ipad with no problem.  However, today, when trying to send an email I get "Cannot Send Mail. The user name or password for "SMTP....... is incorrect" .   I recently changed my ver

  • Right-click Google search - put in new tab or window??

    Safari has a feature that allows one to right-click on some text and then Google that text. When using that feature, it Googles the text, but the new webpage of the Google search for that text appears in the same browser window that one was originall

  • Need help getting mysql data

    I have two pages, page X has all the record and page Y has a record that is based  on a url paramater sent from page X, meaning at the end in the browser I have something like this: the_site/item_detail.php?item_name=KEDS, CHUKKA, BLUE SLATE The thin

  • CALENDAR ERASE ..... Giving phone to a friend

    I am giving my Curve to a friend and want to delete all calendar information.. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

  • Multimedia objects

    Hi there folks. Hope your year is going well so far. Has anyone used multimedia content (AVIs, WAVs, JPEGs, etc.) stored in BinaryData objects? Is there an easy way to 'play' these on a windows client? Are there any gotchas in terms of storing to/ret