Taxability Model - WV07

Hello all,
Might anyone have experience in setting up the custom taxes configuration for Fairmont, West Virginia - WV07?
I have all of the third party tax information configured but am now having issues with the Taxability Model and continue to get messages when simulating an employee that reflects that I have "No entry in Table T5UTO". I've created Tax Type 76 - City Service Fee for "Identification number" 2 - Tax in the table, but see that there are multiple entries for the 7 ID's and am wondering if I need to create the same for tax type 76 or if I only have to enter the ID #2?
I do also have questions relating to tax combinations, when I do a drop down of the codes, I see the tax type but don't have any idea what the codes equate to. Might there be any suggestions as to how to find the combinations behind them?
If anyone has any suggestions, directions or documentation for creating the custom configuration, it would be appreciated!!
Thanks for your time and consideration.....Vicki

Hi Surya,
Yes i checked payroll log from there i found this error.
Thanks,
Ankur.

Similar Messages

Duplicates in Tax Model per BSI

How do I find and correct Duplicates in the Tax Model/Tax Combos?
I have received BSI error 1401 in four states (CA, AZ, DE, MS) and have been told that I have "duplicates" but I have no idea how to identify the duplicate(s) in question.

Hi,
Maybe are you talking about BSI error 4101 instead of 1401? If so, here are some explanation about
your query:
Please check tables T5UTE, T5UTM and T5UTY for the authorities FED and state tax authorities.
T5UTE - Each tax authority is assigned to a taxability model
T5UTM - Each taxability model is assigned one or more tax type
        combinations
        For each model, different tax type combinations may be specified
        for different resident/work/UI tax areas, tax modifiers (TXMOD),
        and taxability classes (TXBCL).
        Taxability class is the value of processing class 71 in table
        T512W; thus, it is defined at the wage type level.
T5UTY - Each tax type combination is assigned one or more tax types.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Daniela.

Tax tables & model

All,
As my client is not operating in all states, i wanted to check if we still have to create all the tax tables (tax authorities,tax models etc) completely new? Or can i just delete the tax authorities where my client is not operating?
Any response will be appreciated.
Thanks

Hello,
You can have tax authorities in your system even though you dont operate in the authorities, but you dont need to create Taxability model for the authorities in T5UTM and T5UTY, so even if mistake tax authorities are added in IT 207 or 208, tax will not be calculated.
Kindly refer the WIKI link on the Taxability model
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/Taxability+Model
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/Tax+Authorities
With Regards,
S.Karthik

Tax Models

I need information about Taxablity Models.
Tax Config in SPRO has 2 Parts, First Time Generation and Subsequent Main. Whats the Difference?
Basically AZ Tax Type 15 , Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx is not there so i have updated table
V_T5UTD - Assignment of Tax Authorities to Tax Type
And it worked, now this is also available in First time config node.
Is it a good idea? or i am missing something/doing wrong.
In my Mind Subsequent can only be done if First Time is done.
i..e if i dont add to V_T5UTD and it is not in First time config i cannot do Subsequent. Correct?
But then i am thinking in which case do i need Subsequent maint.if it works with First Time?
Need Help, i m confused.

Hi ,
Can somebody help me to create new tax authorities(BSI version 10.0) in R/3 system. When i tried to enter below entries in the table V_BTXTAXC , system displays " there is no tax authoritiy " 391954 " in the BTXAUTH table .
TUB No.
BSI Code
SAP Code
Description
BSI TUB13
391954
OHTS
Butler Twp-Vandalia Jedz Towns
How do we maintain these entries, Please help.
Thanks
Mary

How to assign tax on Wagetype

Hi Friends,
I have an Issue with Tax. Till now I haven't got a chance to work Tax related issue.
I am creating a new WageType. User is saying this 25% taxable. I came to know by maintaing some Processing Classes it can be maintained.
But my doubt is we are not maintaining Taxes to any WageType in SPRO or either in any table for any WageType. As per my understanding that is done and take care by BSI. But I am confused is where we have to maintain the Tax percentages for various components.
If these are through Processing Classes please let me know where I can find the documentation for this. Any rules etc for these Processing classes.
Please let me know how to maintain Tax for WageTypes.
Thanks & Regards,
John

Hi John,
You can go through the documentation of FUNCTIONS like UTPRI, USTAX,UPAR1, UTXOR. these functions are used for the tax
determination process under subschema 10U0 which will help you to get some understanding.
You can also understand the Taxability Model of US which involves 3 Tables T5UTE, T5UTM and T5UTY to determine the tax
types applicable for a Wage type depneding on his Tax authority.
Thanks,
Vineeth

Puerto Rico Payroll

Dear Friends,
We are in the process of implementing Puero rico payroll in SAP. Please send any documentation you may have.
Appreciate your help.

Hello,
There is no specific payroll for Puerto Rico, it is only the same payroll. You need to maintain IT 207 with PR and maintain the taxability model for PR as per the WIKI document
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/Taxability+Model
With regards,
S.Karthik

Us Payoll : Tax Model Changes : Creation Of A New Tax Class : Impact

Hi Experts,
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 for a wagetype so that it is taxed only for a particular tax authority , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries ( with the new specification ) for other tax authorities as well so that the existing tax calculations happen as it is.
The issue is explained IN DETAIL below :
We have one requirement to include certain wage types X Y Z for the calculation of Transit District Excise Tax /435 in the tax authority ABC
When we checked our system, for these wage types X Y Z the corresponding tax classification is set as 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) which is linked to tax type 1 and not linked to 35 tax type , so we need to assign it to a specification which is having both 1 and 35 tax types. We can assign this to 935 which is linked to both 1 and 35 however this will impact all the wage types that are linked to 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) specification in PC 71.
Our business does not want these other wagetypes to be impacted i.e the requirement is that ONLY X Y Z wagetypes should be included in the calculation of Transit District Exercise Tax /435 for the tax authority ABC.So the option is that we have is to create a new 71 tax class specificaiton say * and assign it to these wagetypes and then create a new entry assining this * in the table T5UTM to 935 for this tax authority so that it is taxed for Transit District Excise Tax /435.
However since we are assigning a new tax class specffication to these wagetypes, there will be a impact on ALL THE OTHER tax authorities where these wagetypes X Y Z are having an old specification of 0 ( Regular taxable wages ). So we have to create newe entries with this new specification * in the table T5UTM so that the current tax calcutions are not impacted.
We have about 500 tax authoties or 500 tax models where we will have to create new entries with the new tax class specirication '" * " , so that these wagetypes are taxed as they are being taxed today, for all of the other tax authorities.
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specirication of PC 71 , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries for other tax authorities., which is next to being impossible as we cannot create 500 entries.
Alternatively we are looking at using the TAX MODIFIER for this requirement , please advise if anyone has used TAX MODIFIER for this kind of a requirement mentioned above. Any suggestions are most welcome.
Regards,
Vineeth
Please Dont use Caps letters
Edited by: Moderator

Yes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities.

Model 415 for Canary Islands Tax Auth.

Hi all,
¿Anyone knows how to get the flat file of declaration form 415 for Canary Islands Tax Authorities?
This form is very similar to 'DAO 347', but whit different file format.
Thanks a lot.

Hi Manny,
               Thnx for the input. However I checked table T5UTX to see the ceiling there. The ceiling is 9000.00. However amt in RT Table for /715 wage type is much below the ceiling value i.e 1,210.51.
Amt in /615 = 1,213.47 . This diff of $ 2.96 is due to the presence of Gross-up wagetype 12SC. I have checked the Tax Model settings for DC thoroughly to see that this wagetype 12SC gets included in the taxable for Er Job Devmt Assessmt tax. And /615 is being calculated as expected in the RT Table. The problem lies with /715 !!
I am a bit confused by the presence of 2 entries for Tax Type 15 in the payroll log in Func USTAX:
Tax authority DC District Of Columbia DA01
Tax Category                                                  Tax.inc    Tax-free Inc.Declare Tax.earning         Tax
01 Withholding Tax                          (REG)     1213.47        0.00     1213.47     1213.47            57.00
10 Employer Unemployment Tax      (REG)     1213.47        0.00     1213.47     1213.47           15.78
15 Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx      (REG)        2.96            0.00        2.96        2.96                    0.01
15 Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx      (REG)     1210.51        0.00     1210.51     1210.51             2.42
41 Employee Disability Tax             (REG)        2.96             0.00        2.96        0.00                  0.00
Why are there 2 entries separately for Tax Type 15 ? The answer might be the solution to this issue.
Please help.
Thanks And Regards,
Somdeb Banerjee.

Tax Model

Hi,
Existing process: GTLI creates two wage types -
/BT1 which is taxable but not taxed (creates Q01) which has a value of "5" for processing class 71 and 3405 which is Taxable but not taxed and has a value of "K".
Requirement: GTLI needs to be added along with /701 for MO02 tax model.
If I take out the entry for tax model 33 for "5" - /Q01 stops getting created but there is one more WT3206 also has this value. I need this to be added to /Q01.
Request suggestion how this can be done.
Thanks
Karthick

i have been researching and have found that NJ state taxes are like Puerto Rico taxes. The Schema UMOT may have to be used with a different modifier to calculate Withhoding tax for NJ , different from FED.
Has anyone of you used this schema ? I find that UTAXRAUTHY ( tax authority) is an Operation in the deecisison tree .Can anyone confirm if Tax type is also an operation?
I shall appreciate any related feedback.Thanks.

Taxable Wages

I need to know how I can get a wage-type to be taxable in Philadelphia, but NOT Taxable in PA.
Thanks

You will have to create a custom processing tax class 71 and attach this to the correct tax models with the correct tax combo. If you do not have any exisitng processing class that functions, per your new requirement.

Not Able To View Data in Web Service Model

Hi ,
   I m trying to view a table using web service model.
   When i write the same code for binding it to context , i m able to view its data.
   But not so while using Web Service Model(not adaptive web service model).
   The code is:
         Request_ZMANAGE_MAKT_ZMANAGE_ZMAKT object1 =new Request_ZMANAGE_MAKT_ZMANAGE_ZMAKT();
   wdContext.nodeRequest_ZMANAGE_MAKT_ZMANAGE_ZMAKT().bind(object1);
   object1.setResponse(new Response_ZMANAGE_MAKT_ZMANAGE_ZMAKT());
CAn anybody plz solve my problem.
Thanks..
Regards,
Ankita

Hi,
I have no problem with item :P15_EV_LCL this is having a value my probem here is i am using java script to display the value in different color based on the condtion case
eg:
select
case
TRUNC((
( (NVL(Z."AEWP",0) - NVL(Z."BEWP_Final",0) ) / DECODE(Z."BEWP_Final",0,NULL,Z."BEWP_Final") ) * 100
),2)
= :P15_EV_LCL
then
span style="background-color:lightgreen"
|| TRUNC((
( (NVL(Z."AEWP",0) - NVL(Z."BEWP_Final",0) ) / DECODE(Z."BEWP_Final",0,NULL,Z."BEWP_Final") ) * 100
),2) || '%' || /span
else
span style="background-color:yellow"
|| TRUNC(
( (NVL(Z."AEWP",0) - NVL(Z."BEWP_Final",0) ) / DECODE(Z."BEWP_Final",0,NULL,Z."BEWP_Final") ) * 100
),2) || '%' || /span
end "Effort"
from actuals Z
If i dont use this <Span style="Background-color:color"> i am able to generate data in excel sheet if i use this color coding i am not able to get data in spread sheet.
Please suggest
Thanks
Sudhir
Edited by: Sudhir_N on Mar 23, 2009 10:00 PM

Avoiding null and duplicate values using model clause

Hi,
I am trying to use model clause to get comma seperated list of data : following is the scenario:
testuser>select * from test1;
ID VALUE
1 Value1
2 Value2
3 Value3
4 Value4
5 Value4
6
7 value5
8
8 rows selected.
the query I have is:
testuser>with src as (
2 select distinct id,value
3 from test1
4 ),
5 t as (
6 select distinct substr(value,2) value
7 from src
8 model
9 ignore nav
10 dimension by (id)
11 measures (cast(value as varchar2(100)) value)
12 rules
13 (
14 value[any] order by id =
15 value[cv()-1] || ',' || value[cv()]
16 )
17 )
18 select max(value) oneline
19 from t;
ONELINE
Value1,Value2,Value3,Value4,Value4,,value5,
what I find is that this query has duplicate value and null (',,') coming in as data has null and duplicate value. Is there a way i can avoid the null and the duplicate values in the query output?
thanks,
Edited by: orausern on Feb 19, 2010 5:05 AM

Hi,
Try this code.
with
t as ( select substr(value,2)value,ind
        from test1
        model
        ignore nav
        dimension by (id)
        measures (cast(value as varchar2(100)) value, 0 ind)
        rules
        ( ind[any]= instr(value[cv()-1],value[cv()]),
        value[any] order by id = value[cv()-1] || CASE WHEN value[cv()] IS NOT NULL
                                           and ind[cv()]=0     THEN ',' || value[cv()] END
select max(value) oneline
from t;
SQL> select * from test1;
        ID VALUE
         1 Value1
         2 Value2
         3 Value3
         4 Value4
         5 Value4
         6
         7 value5
         8
8 ligne(s) sélectionnée(s).
SQL> with
2   t as ( select substr(value,2)value,ind
3          from test1
4          model
5          ignore nav
6          dimension by (id)
7          measures (cast(value as varchar2(100)) value, 0 ind)
8          rules
9          ( ind[any]= instr(value[cv()-1],value[cv()]),
10          value[any] order by id = value[cv()-1] || CASE WHEN value[cv()] IS NOT NULL
11                                             and ind[cv()]=0     THEN ',' || value[cv()] END
12          )
13        )
14   select max(value) oneline
15   from t;
ONELINE
Value1,Value2,Value3,Value4,value5
SQL>

How do I access the web utility with model cisco sf302-08p ?

Hi,i have a problem with the model Cisco SB SF302-08PP Switch , i connect a cable rj45 to my pc and configure the adapter local area connection (ip address:192.168.1.252), the LEDs blink green, and go to the address bar and get the IP by default, which according to the manual is 192.168.1.254 and the result is: page not found. Is there any way to change the web utility? How do I access the web utility?

restore the switch by holding more than 30 seconds and try accessing with ip 192.168.1.254. username and password is "cisco". before change your base ip to 192.168.1.2-253.try to ping and check the connectivity

Excel Workbook with Excel Data Model stored on SharePoint - daily refresh

I'm not sure if this is exactly the right forum but I'm hoping that someone here can either answer or point me in the right direction.
I have an Excel Workbook with an Excel Data Model.
The Excel Data Model uses SQL to contact our data warehouse and pull through data into tables.
We are storing the Workbook on a SharePoint site and viewing it using Excel Services.
The data in our data warehouse is updated daily and so I would like to refresh the workbook daily and remove the option to refresh the data in the browser.
Is this possible with a workbook that has an Excel Data Model (I've seen lots of posts that relate to workbooks with connections to tabular models).
Thanks
Paul

Hi Paul,
I have answered this issue in this thread that you posted in SQL Server PowerPivot for SharePoint forum, please see:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/9627939c-e9f1-48ae-a6ed-0c238d8f2d69/excel-workbook-with-excel-data-model-stored-on-sharepoint-daily-refresh?forum=sqlkjpowerpointforsharepoint
Furthermore, this issue is more related to PowerPivot for SharePoint. If you have any more questions about PowerPivot for SharePoint, I would sugget you open a new thread in the forum below for better support:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=sqlkjpowerpointforsharepoint
Thanks for your understanding.
Regards,
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

What is the correct part number for dvi to vga adapter for macbook pro model A1260

Can someone tell me the Apple part number for the DVI to VGA adapter that came with a Macbook Pro model A1260? (Early 2008)
My adapter has reached the end of useful life.
Thanks!

You have a MacBook Pro 15" Early 2009 (MacBook Pro 4,1)
The Mac's port is a Dual-link DVI (VGA, Composite and S-video with adapter)
The DVI connector connects to the Dual link-DVI port,thus you need a DVI to VGA adapter.
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Micro%20Accessories/DVIVGA/
You also can search the Apple store online for the part, but it's so basic and simple that paying more for Apple's version is just for looks.

Taxability Model - WV07

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for