TDS line items are not getting reflected in J1INCHLN

Hi Experts,
While generating TDS challan we are not getting advance line items in J1INCHLN screen
We made one advance payment which included 2 payment line items and two different tax codes, while generating TDS challan its is showing only one TDS line item that is Rs.1000/-, another TDS line item of Rs.966/- is not showing.
Below is the example
XYZ                                                                         43,000.00
XYZ                                                                         46,000.00
Bank                                                                        96,329.00-
S/Tax Interim-In Cr                                                    5,160.00
S/Tax Interim-In Cr                                                   3,864.00
ST Interim E.C-In Cr                                                 103.00
ST Interim E.C-In Cr                                                 77.00
ST Inter H E.C-In Cr                                                 52.00
ST Inter H E.C-In Cr                                                 39.00
TDS Pble Contractors                                              966.00-
TDS Pble Contractors                                              1,000.00-
I checked the below possibilities for reason why its not getting reflected
Vendor master having recipient type
WITH_ITEM table updated with recipient type
In the line item also having Business Place and section code
Please suggest me is there any way to resolve the issue.
Thanks & Regards,
AIM

Hi,
Check whether the recipient type CO or OT is updated in With_item table for the line items that are missing in J1INCHLN.
If Recipient type is not maintained in vendor master, at the time of posting the entry, then it does not get picked up in J1INCHLN. Even if you maintain in Vendor master later on, the With_item table does not get updated. This is one of the reasons why the line items does not get picked up in J1INCHLN. Check this, as you are confirming that Business Place, Section code etc.. are all present in line items and also that it is appearing correctly in With_item table.
Regards
Divya S

Similar Messages

  • TDS liability line items are not picking in u2013 J1INCHLN

    Hi Experts
    During depositing of TDS through J1INCHLN it is not picking all line items i.e. available in Ledger (FBL3N). We came to know after reconciliation even as all line items are available in table With_item as uncleared.
    We are facing this problem as the data from 01.03.2009u2026. Previously everything was working fine.
    One more thing I will stress here that we have started Purchase Order based invoice verification also from this period.
    Pl help ASAP.
    Regards
    Kuldeep Dubey

    check the line of TDS is having the Business Place, if the business place is not capturng in TDS line items , then the create the substitution for Business Place & Section Code.
    without business place in TDS line items you can't make the TDS payment.
    Regards
    Akmal

  • TDS line items are not Display in FB60

    Hi Experts,
    when in simulate a document in  T code- FB60. the TDS amount is calculated properly . DR , Cr is ok but the Line item of the TDS is not displayed.  when i post the document and open in FB03 all line items are dispalyed with TDS Line items also.. Proper Tax code of payment and invoice is attached.
    why not shown in FB60 when simulating a document??

    Hi
    If in FB60 you want to simulate tax items also, click on simulate from menu, you will be able to see the required details. If you click on simulate icon, it will not be visible.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    <a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">nature wallpapers</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>f in FB60

  • Asset Line items are not updating in table ANEP

    Hi friends,
    I found that asset line items are not getting updated in ANEP table,.
    This is my precedure for posting of depreciation.
    I'll create Asset through AS01, then i'll use the T.Code: F-90.. then i'll run the depreciation program thru t.Code: AFAB.
    In but i am unable to capture the values of Planned and Depreciated or Posted values in ANEP.. Is there is any other table for this...
    Where is the mistake in my process..
    thanks in advance..
    Naveen

    HI Naveen
    The FI-AA documents are stored in tables ANEK (document header), ANEP (document line items) and ANEA (proportional values). You can use FI-AA standard report RABEWG_ALV01 to list all transactions to an asset in one fiscal year, and report RAABGA_ALV01 to list only retirement postings.
    ANEA should be the solution you are looking for.
    Hope it helps!
    Cheers
    Z

  • Chnages in the Graph properties are not getting reflected in the Browser.

    Hi,
    I have made some changes in the Graph properties in web template,
    Eg. : 1. change in color of a series for a columnar type graph
             2.change in the Text properties of Graph Series..
    When I save the template and try to run in the Browser, these changes are not getting reflected.
    Can anybody help me in this aspect ?
    Thanks.
    Regards.
    Amol Bade

    Same here :´(
    Thanks In Advance
    Juan

  • New changes are not getting reflected in the bam reports.

    Hi
    I have created a BPEL process and it polls the data from a table and populate an object created in Bam.I have accomplished the above task by createing two database adaptors.One is on 10g database and another one is on Bam database.I have created a view based on the bamobject and used a database adaptor to populate the data. BPEL process is populating the data properly to that bamobject but those changes are not reflecting to bam reports automaticaly. We need to refresh the report or reprompt the report to see the changes.Could some help me to reslove this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Laj Abraham

    Hi charles
    I have tried that option too.But that is also not working. BPEL Procees is able to populate the BAM object with the help of the sensor.But those changes are not getting reflected in BAM Reports.But if i create or update an existing record in BAM object through BAM Architect, those changes are getting reflected in BAM Reports(No manual intervention is required).
    Your help in this regard is highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Laj Abraham

  • Changes are not getting reflected in Process Chain after changes.

    Hello,
    I have modified a Process Chain in Development environment. I have created one new infopackage and included it in the process chain. I have also added two new change run variants in the process chain. I have collected the process chain and infopackage in a transport request and transported it to integration environment.
    Transport request has reached successfully in integration but the changes in process chain are not getting reflected. The infopackage has reached to integration after transport.
    I need some suggestion on this.
    Regards,
    Sanjay

    Hi Sanjay.......
    R u in Display mode..........click on Change mode...........
    If you can see the chain in Change mode............then ur process chain is imported in in-active version..........
    U can try activating it manually or re-transport the active version..........
    Regards,
    Debjani......

  • Few line items are not coming at the time of creation of delivery

    Dear Experts,
    When the user creating the delivery few line items are not picking in the delivery document
    the following checks i verified,
    Stock is available
    shpping condition is differ from sold to party and sales document
    Plants are same for all the line items
    why the few line items are not coming in the delivery document creation,
    please help me to sort out this issue
    Thanks and Best Regards,
    Muralidharan S

    Hi,
    Check below points.
    Point 1:
    When you create a delivery document, you create it for a Shipping Point.
    So whatever the line that came in to one delivery has determined same shipping point that you entered in VL01N screen.
    Others got a different shipping point and that's why it didn't come to the same delivery document.
    Shipping point determined based on below criteria
    - Shipping Condition - From customer master
    - Loading Group - Material
    - Plant  - Delivery Plant of the sales order line item
    You assign a proffered shipping point for above combination in configuration.
    If that combination is not find, those line items are not going in to the delivery.
    You can check the log of the delivery document for more information as well.
    Point 2:
    Check the line item Requested delivery date and the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
    Al  Requested delivery dates has to be on or before the  "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
    Those line items which has a date more than that will dropped in the delivery.
    Best regards,
    Anupa

  • Line items are not appearing for some users

    Hi
    In one module pool program some line items are not appering for specific users. For Ex: Out of 5 line items user1 is able to see only 3 and user2 able to see all the line items. what might be the reason.
    Regards
    John.

    Hi,
    What do you mean by line items? Are you talking about screen fields in your module pool program or output of the program?
    Please clarify your issue.
    Regards,
    RS

  • Line items are not coming on next page in Bill of Lading

    When I am printing Bill of Lading, if it has around 8 line items then its printing on the first page, but if line items are more then its not printing the remaining line items on second page.
    I have one delivery with 10 line items, when I am printing it then on first page 7 line items are coming and for 8 line item only material is printing and on second page its description is printing but last two line items are not printing at all.
    Kindly help me to resolve the issue as it is very critical.

    Hi,
    Check below points.
    Point 1:
    When you create a delivery document, you create it for a Shipping Point.
    So whatever the line that came in to one delivery has determined same shipping point that you entered in VL01N screen.
    Others got a different shipping point and that's why it didn't come to the same delivery document.
    Shipping point determined based on below criteria
    - Shipping Condition - From customer master
    - Loading Group - Material
    - Plant  - Delivery Plant of the sales order line item
    You assign a proffered shipping point for above combination in configuration.
    If that combination is not find, those line items are not going in to the delivery.
    You can check the log of the delivery document for more information as well.
    Point 2:
    Check the line item Requested delivery date and the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
    Al  Requested delivery dates has to be on or before the  "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
    Those line items which has a date more than that will dropped in the delivery.
    Best regards,
    Anupa

  • 2LIS_02_ITM deleted line items are not reflected in BW

    Hi,
    Our current Data flow 2LIS_02_ITM-->DSO-->CUBE.
    I am analyzing a Invoice, When it is created 01.04.2014 it has got 10 Line Items and all the data is load to BW,Invoice with 10 Line items.
    In ECC I can now see the same Invoice only got 5 line items and from change log I can see 5 line items are deleted on 15.04.2014.These changes are not reflected in BW.In BW invoice data still shows 10 line items.
    If I perform setup table job and ECC RSA3 for that invoice I am getting only 5.
    I believe it’s something to do with 0RECORDMODE,Can you please let me know how to fix this in BW.
    Thanks

    Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
    For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
    To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
    Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
    Regards,
    AL

  • SAP Note 1486147 - TDS line item details not flowing in Form 16 A Samrtform

    1.     Old Form 16 certificate is printed before 01.04.2010 and new certificate after 01.04.2010. (its correct SAP has written code in such a manner Old one is SAP script and new on is Smartform.)
    Old FORM 16 A gets Acknowledgement No details correctly.
    2.     Acknowledgment No details are not flowing in the NEW Smart Form of Form 16 A.
    When I debug the program I can see PARTNER No details are copied in PAN NO field in TABLE : IT_LFA11[]
    BUT PARTNER NO details are copied to PARTNERNO field  in TABLE IT_LAFA1[].
    TDS line item details on Smart Form is printed based on Partner no. here partner no. is blank as IT_LFA11 table is passed to smartform..
    Program name : J_1IEWT_CERT
    Include name : J_1IEWT_CERT_F01.
    Code:
    FORM CALL_FORM .
      DATA: h_formname TYPE tdsfname,
              h_fmname TYPE rs38l_fnam,
              h_output_info  TYPE  ssfcrescl,
              h_spoolids TYPE LINE OF ssfcrescl-spoolids,
              h_output_options TYPE ssfcompop,
               spoolno(10) TYPE c.
      DATA : it_lfa11 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_LFA1 INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_printtab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_PRINTTAB INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_deduc TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_DEDUCTEE INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_qrtrtab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_QRTRTAB INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_challan TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_CHALLANDETAB INITIAL SIZE 0.
      SORT challandetab BY j_1iextchdt DESCENDING.
      it_lfa11[] = it_lfa1[].
      it_printtab[] = printtab[].
      it_deduc[] = it_deductor[].
      it_qrtrtab[] = qrtrtab[].
      it_challan[] = challandetab[].
      h_output_options-tdnewid    = 'X'.
      h_formname = layout.
      CALL FUNCTION 'SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME'
        EXPORTING
          formname                 = h_formname
    *   VARIANT                  = ' '
    *   DIRECT_CALL              = ' '
       IMPORTING
         fm_name                  = h_fmname
    * EXCEPTIONS
    *   NO_FORM                  = 1
    *   NO_FUNCTION_MODULE       = 2
    *   OTHERS                   = 3
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    * MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
    *         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ENDIF.
      CALL FUNCTION h_fmname
    EXPORTING
    *   ARCHIVE_INDEX              =
    *   ARCHIVE_INDEX_TAB          =
    *   ARCHIVE_PARAMETERS         =
    *   CONTROL_PARAMETERS         =
    *   MAIL_APPL_OBJ              =
    *   MAIL_RECIPIENT             =
    *   MAIL_SENDER                =
       OUTPUT_OPTIONS             = h_output_options
    *   USER_SETTINGS              = 'X'
    IMPORTING
    *   DOCUMENT_OUTPUT_INFO       =
       job_output_info            =  h_output_info
    *   JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS         =
        TABLES
          it_lfa1                    =   it_lfa11
          it_printtab                = it_printtab
          it_deductee                = it_deduc
          it_qrtrtab                 = it_qrtrtab
          it_challandetab            = it_challan
    * EXCEPTIONS
    *   FORMATTING_ERROR           = 1
    *   INTERNAL_ERROR             = 2
    *   SEND_ERROR                 = 3
    *   USER_CANCELED              = 4
    *   OTHERS                     = 5
      IF sy-subrc = 0.                                          "1375614
        CLEAR :spoolno,h_spoolids.
        READ TABLE h_output_info-spoolids INTO h_spoolids INDEX 1.
        IF h_spoolids IS NOT INITIAL.
          spoolno  = h_spoolids.
          CONDENSE :spoolno.
          MESSAGE i155(id_wt) WITH spoolno.
          PERFORM update_cert_tables.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    * MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
    *         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ENDIF.
    ENDFORM.     
    Can anyone Please help me to get TDS details on the Smartform.
    Regards,
    DivyaLalwani.
    Edited by: kishan P on Feb 23, 2011 1:28 PM

    Hi,
    Achnowledgement details comes in table it_qrtrtab at run time in the smartform, you can dibug the program j_1iewt_cert and smartforms J_1iewt_cert where at run time you will able to see data avaialability, If values are not available in this internal table then check related notes given by SAP, I have already implemented this note and also faced same issue but my FI consultant has given me the related note and my issue was resolved.
    Please checkout related notes and data population in the dibugger.
    Regards,
    Umang Mehta

  • Sales Order Line item category not getting Re detemining Correctly

    Dear all,
                I need  help regarding the Sales order item category redetermination.
                we are having two item categories YNAE and YNAG and it contains schedule  line categories CP and CB ( i.e for item         category  YNAE schedule line category is CP and for item category YNAG schedule line category is CB),
    for YNAG Purchase Requisition is automatically created becz of functional setting on save and it is working fine.
    For every line item in sales order line item level item category YNAE will be determined by default as per functional settings.
             Now my requirement is that, if sales order line item doesn't contain 100% confirmed quantity, than i needs to change the default line item category YNAE to YNAG which i am trying to do it in USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP becz in this exit i am getting the values in XVBAP and XVBEP and  it is working fine .
             But schedule line category is not getting redetermined automatically what i mean is, if i change the item category to YNAG from YNAE in user exit corresponding schedule line category CB of YNAG is getting determined automatically at the schedule line level and if ichange the schedule line categories in XVBEP in exit USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP, changes are reflecting at the schedule line level but Purchase requisation is not getting created for schedule line on SAVE and its delivary dates are also not getting determined properly. If i press the option ATP check at the schedule line level than very things will getting corrected.
       I feel that i am not doing this in proper way, do u have any idea about how to redetermine item category. please let me know if u have any idea .
    Regards,
    Vaddepally Manoj

    USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP is the wrong location - that exit is for pricing communication preparation only.  Your primary location for item category determination is USEREXIT_SOURCE_DETERMINATION (MV45AFZB).  In your simple scenario, you could consider making an availability check at this point with some assumptions and then assign the item category accordingly.  Otherwise, you can re-assign item category and schedule line category in USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBEP.  The exit is called once before ATP (for ATP-relevant schedule line categories) and once afterwards.  The call is recursive if you re-assign another ATP-relevant category.

  • The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

    Hi,
    We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
    We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in  SRM system.
    But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
    Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
    Best Regards,
    Siddappa

    Hello Siddappa,
    I am a little confused here with the scenario.
    I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
    So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
    So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
    However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
    So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
    I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
    Regards
    Pramod

  • Special Ledger: Open Line items are not being loaded in BW

    Hi all.
    We are loading Special Ledger information from R/3 to BW, and for many accounts, the data is not reconciling between the two systems.
    We have found out that none of the Open Line Items are being transferred.
    Do you know which could be the cause for this?
    Thanks and Regards

    Hi Daniel,
    Could you give some more details about the extractors and the "Open Line Items"?
    -Bikas

Maybe you are looking for