TEMP tablespace is always full in Enterprise Manager

The TEMP tablespace is always (99.99%) full in Enterprise Manager console. How can I release it and check it?

Yes, Kamal did give the answer. owever, it still remains confusing to most people.
The temp tablespace, like all tablespaces, is used to hold SEGMENTS. There are several kinds of temporary segments, including sort segments and segments for global temporary tables.
WHen a segment is allocated, it takes time to find the blocks that are free and to format those blocks.
Oracle's performance measure to counter the cost of finding and formatting free blocks is to leave the segment allocated at that kind of block. When a session terminates, any temprary segments it holds will be released to the free pool of 'that type of temprary segment', and another session can then (as you say) reuse the space.
Still, this is frustrating for the new DBA who has not read the concepts manual and not searched the forum on 'v$sort' or 'temporary tablespace usage'.
http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/logical.htm#sthref399

Similar Messages

Managing TEMP tablespace

Hi Folks,
My temp tablespace is 100% full...what should i do? Pls keep in mind that the Auto Exted is ON & this is a 24x7 DB.
Please advice.

Sometime it really difficult to decide between temp tablespace or tempfile..
We also running 24*7 and customer make their own code to duplicate scheme using their Java code .
What happen is , some scheme is really big and sometime we allocate 12gig for database size of 20. because of 1 scheme which is big enough. 10 gig.
We did encounter lack of space after we increase their tempfile and we shrink their tempfile again to gain more space...
I don't think this is a good way..but till now i haven't find out a best way to handle it.

Temp tablespace issue

Hi,
We are facing continuous problem of slow performance in some applications...i found that temp tablespace is becoming full frequently...so after that reports are getting delayed..is there any permanent fix for this problem..
We have recreated the temp tablespace...
Regards,
Joshua

Hi,
pls find the details...
VERSION:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
some info abt temp tablespace:
TABLESPACE_NAME BYTES_COALESCED EXTENTS_COALESCED PERCENT_EXTENTS_COALESCED BLOCKS_COALESCED PERCENT_BLOCKS_COALESCED
TEMP_SCHEMA_USR 50724864 2 100 6192 100
is that means coalescing would solve the problem ?...
We have some limitation that we cant control the users since they are very critical in operation...
Is Adding datafile will solve the problem(bcoz b4 sometime i added one file....no improvement)...

Temp tablespace filling up

Hi,
The temp tablespace on our DB has suddenly started filling up.
There is 4gb ram on the server, roughly 1.3G is used by the OS,
, 1.7 bg the sga and 700mb by PGA target parameter.
We are using ASM, so the sort_area_size parameter does not come into play.
All the ratios are fine, but once the temp tablespace is nearly full, things grind to a halt.
Has anyone got any hints about best way forward.
I have set statspack to run on the hour.
I appreciate ram is low, but I am confused as to why this has suddenly started to happen.
Thanks for reading.

cleme1a wrote:
Hi,
The temp tablespace on our DB has suddenly started filling up.
There is 4gb ram on the server, roughly 1.3G is used by the OS,
, 1.7 bg the sga and 700mb by PGA target parameter.
We are using ASM, so the sort_area_size parameter does not come into play.
All the ratios are fine, but once the temp tablespace is nearly full, things grind to a halt.Ratios are mythical indicators of performance.
do as below so we can know complete Oracle version & OS name.
Post via COPY & PASTE complete results of the following:
sqlplus <username>/<password>
SELECT * from v$version;
exit

Releasing TEMP tablespace segments

Hi All
Due to some SQL Queries, the temp tablespace is getting full. I want to release the space in the TEMP tablespace by a command. I know SMON does it (correct me). I have Oracle 9i, and the TEMP tablespace is a local tablespace.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Bala

temp segment is full may be normal...you need to add some space! well, you can't clean the temp segments when it is used by some running process! smon allocates and deallocates space in temp segment, users doesn't have any control!! how did you define the temp segments...temporary or permanent? and why smon is not doing the cleanup...couple of stack dump of smon would be helpful. you can use any debugger in your system to dump the stack.
Thanks,
G

TEMP tablespace getting full while inserting a CLOB in Trigger

We have a Oracle 10g (10.2.0.4.0) DB on a Solaris 9 box which also runs our J2EE web-service application on Weblogic 8sp6 server.
We get around 220K web-service requests from upstream callers daily to insert data in the main table, say TABLE1, which has daily partitions on a date column. This table has around 21 columns out of which 1 is a CLOB column.
Now this table has an AFTER INSERT trigger which calls a package procedure to insert the same record into another table, say TABLE2.
From Java application insert statement in executed in below format using a weblogic jdbc connection pool :
INSERT INTO TABLE1(COLUMN1, COLUMN2, ........., CLOB_COLUMN,........, COLUMN21) VALUES (:1, :2, :3, :4, :5, :6, :7, :8, :9, :10, :11, :12, :13, :14, :15, :16, :17, :18, :19, :20);
Clob object is prepared in application using ojdbc14.jar.
We are observing a strange issue here. The TEMP tablespace utilization keeps on growing as more and more inserts are executed by application and after ~125K inserts the TEMP tablespace gets full and we start getting ORA-01652 error.
On further analysis we could see that there are only 7-10 session being maintained but as more and more inserts happen TEMP tablespace utilization goes on increasing for each of these sessions.
When we tried with inserting just few records and then watching the session details in v$session_wait then we could see that it is in INACTIVE state and waiting for the event ‘SQL*Net message from client’. This does not seem correct as the session has successfully inserted the data and committed the transaction and we can see the data in the tables as well.
The confusing thing here is when we modify the trigger to pass blank string('' ) instead of the CLOB column to TABLE2 then this issue does not occur. All 200K records are inserted properly and TEMP tablespace utilization also keep always below 1%.
Can you please help us in solving this issue. Is this related to any oracle issue?
Inside the package we have tried using DBMS_COPY statement to copy the CLOB column after insert but still same result.
Code for reference:
Trigger:
=====================================
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER trg
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE
ON TABLE1
REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF (:NEW.date_col > SYSDATE - 2)
THEN
IF (:NEW.cat IN (1001, 1002))
THEN
pkg.process_change
     (:NEW.COLUMN1,
          :NEW.COLUMN2,
          :NEW.CLOB_COLUMN,
FLAG
END IF;
END IF;
END;
=====================================
Package:
=====================================
procedure PKG.Process_change(
p_COLUMN1 number,
p_COLUMN2 varchar2,
p_CLOB_COLUMN clob,
flag boolean
) is
v_watermark pls_integer;
v_type varchar2(1);
begin
if (flag) then
v_type := 'U';
else
v_type := 'I';
end if;
select t_seq.nextval into v_watermark from dual;
insert into TABLE2(
COLUMN1 number,
COLUMN2 varchar2,
CLOB_COLUMN clob,
watermark,
dml_type
)values (
p_COLUMN1 number,
p_COLUMN2 varchar2,
p_CLOB_COLUMN clob,
v_watermark,
v_dml_type
end;
=====================================

My first thought on reading your post is that not only are you using a database version that is now so old it is in extended support and even then not even the most recent patchset for it.
The first thing I would do is move to 11gR2 and if you can't do that at least get to 10.2.0.5 and apply CLOB relevant patches as well.
Same goes for your operating system. Solaris 9 is ancient: So move to 10 which has vastly improved memory management.
To help you further it would be really valuable to know the table layout. For example is this a heap table or an IOT? Is it partitioned? Is this RAC? What size are the CLOBs? Are they stored in-line? Chunk size? etc.
This page should start you down the right road:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14249/adlob_tables.htm#sthref204
But I am also wondering why you would use a trigger to, as you say, "insert the same record into another table." This description is a poster child for "bad design."

Temp tablespace full at startup

Hi,
my temp tablespace appears full at database startup. I know it is full because the collecting statistics process can not be executed since temp tablespace can not grow (autoextend off). I had to add another temp datafile to get the statistics but first one continues full after each restart.
Is this any signal of malfunction?
Thanks for all.
Greetings.

ok. I think all is understood.
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SCHEMA_STATS probably needed more disk than 1.5 GB (my old temp tablespace), so the result was
ERROR en línea 1:
ORA-01652: no se ha podido ampliar el segmento temporal con 128 en el
tablespace TEMP
ORA-06512: en "SYS.DBMS_STATS", línea 9136
ORA-06512: en "SYS.DBMS_STATS", línea 9616
ORA-06512: en "SYS.DBMS_STATS", línea 9800
ORA-06512: en "SYS.DBMS_STATS", línea 9854
ORA-06512: en "SYS.DBMS_STATS", línea 9831
ORA-06512: en línea 1
Then adding new datafile (1.5 GB more) process could finish. Database continues growing, process always had finished not yesterday: the day of needing full temp tablespace came.
Tell me if I am wrong.
Thanks a lot.

Wish to clear tablespace alert at Enterprise Manager 10g

Is that a way to clear tablespace full alert at Enterprise Manager 10g?
I have added the required space to the database but the alert is still there.
Below is the screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/glve4.png
There is new and valid tablespace alert coming, and I am sure the space adviser is kept running. But I have no idea why the alert has not been cleared.
Note: I do not wish to change or disable the metric. If another tablespace nearly full, I want to be alerted.
Edited by: csmth96 on Jan 18, 2012 3:49 PM

This is the followup on the alert.
The alert is generated based on metrics behind "dba_tablespace_usage_metrics". Without fixing the metric collection process, removal of an alert only caused the alert to be shown some time later. The removal of alert looks working initially but it does not fixed anything.
My database is created at 10.2.0.2 but upgraded to 10.2.0.4 recently. Because the alert is created before the upgrade, it is reasonable to believe that the metric collection problem has started before the upgrade (rather than the upgrade has caused the problem). Having reviewed metalink DocID 736909.1, it is reasonabMyle to believe the view "dba_tablespace_usage_metrics" is the problem source. It summed up the max size of all files in tablespace as the tablespace size. However, before 10.2.0.4, extending a datafile does not increase the max file size (view "v$filespace_usage", the limit of autoextend). If the actual usage is large than the autoextend limit, the usage is more than 100%.
My action is to increase the autoextend limit (max file size) of datafile to the same as allocated file size. No autoextend is actually allowed. The autoextend limit is reset so that "dba_tablespace_usage_metrics" is corrected and it is no longer possible to have more than 100% tablespace usage. The alert is gone several minutes later.
I doubt whether it make sense to compare the actual usage vs autoextend limit. For any concerned DBA, patch 6759910 may be applied at a downtime window.
I conclude the solution provided by "N Gasparotto" is truly correct.
Edited by: csmth96 on Jan 26, 2012 3:26 PM

Difference between enterprise manager and temp space header

The enterprise manager shows temp tablespace usage 0% and v$temp_space_header shows 99% of use.
what is wrong

There's nothing wrong. Temporary tablespaces don't release space,space is reused,when necessary. That is reflected in v$temp_space_header. EM shows used temporary space in this very moment.
Werner

Full temp tablespace

hi all,
i faced a problem regarding full temp tablespace, i added a tempfile as an immediate measure ,but the problem was with a query
i identified it
the query is
SELECT DISTINCT rt.po_unit_price item_price,
pl.unit_meas_lookup_code uom_code,
TO_NUMBER (porh.segment1) req_number,
msi.segment1 item_code, pl.item_description,
ph.po_header_id, TO_NUMBER (ph.segment1) po_number,
TRUNC (ph.creation_date) po_date, pv.vendor_name supplier,
pll.need_by_date, pl.quantity qty_ordered,
rt.quantity quantity_received,
(rt.quantity * rt.po_unit_price) pl_amount,
ph.currency_code, isd.ige_number ge_no,
isd.ige_date ge_date, rsh.receipt_num,
TRUNC (rt.transaction_date) receipt_date,
isd.lr_number gr_no, isd.transporter_name transporter,
(SELECT SUM (j.tax_amount)
FROM ja_in_receipt_tax_lines j
WHERE j.shipment_header_id =
rsl.shipment_header_id
AND j.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id
AND j.tax_name LIKE 'PO%Freight%') freight,
pvs.vat_reg_no, pvs.cst_reg_no,
pvs.service_tax_regno st_reg_no,
pvs.excise_duty_reg_no excise_reg_no,
pvs.st_reg_no lst_reg_no, ai.invoice_num, ai.invoice_date,
ai.invoice_amount invoice_amount, ai.invoice_currency_code,
TRUNC (ai.terms_date + atl.due_days) date_of_payment,
TRUNC (aca.check_date) payment_date, aca.check_number,
aca.bank_account_name mode_of_payment,
TRUNC (aip.accounting_date) gl_date
FROM po_headers_all ph,
po_lines_all pl,
po_line_locations_all pll,
po_distributions_all pod,
po_req_distributions_all pord,
po_requisition_lines_all porl,
po_requisition_headers_all porh,
mtl_system_items msi,
po_vendors pv,
ja_in_po_vendor_sites pvs,
rcv_transactions rt,
rcv_shipment_headers rsh,
rcv_shipment_lines rsl,
ja_in_receipt_tax_lines jirtl,
ja_in_tax_codes jitc,
ap_invoice_distributions_all aid,
ap_invoices_all ai,
ap_terms_tl att,
ap_terms_lines atl,
ap_invoice_payments_all aip,
ap_checks_all aca,
kpm_ige_security_details isd,
kpm_ige_purchase_orders ipo
WHERE ph.po_header_id = pl.po_header_id
AND ph.po_header_id = pod.po_header_id
AND pl.po_line_id = pod.po_line_id
AND pl.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id
AND pl.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id
AND pod.req_distribution_id = pord.distribution_id(+)
AND pord.requisition_line_id = porl.requisition_line_id(+)
AND porl.requisition_header_id = porh.requisition_header_id(+)
AND msi.organization_id = 136
AND
pv.vendor_id = pvs.vendor_id
AND ph.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
AND ph.vendor_site_id = pvs.vendor_site_id
AND rt.po_header_id = pl.po_header_id
AND rt.po_line_id = pl.po_line_id
AND rt.transaction_type = 'RECEIVE'
AND isd.ige_header_id = ipo.ige_header_id
AND ipo.po_header_id = ph.po_header_id
AND rsh.shipment_header_id = rsl.shipment_header_id
AND rt.shipment_header_id = rsl.shipment_header_id
AND rt.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id
AND rsl.shipment_header_id = jirtl.shipment_header_id
AND rsl.shipment_line_id = jirtl.shipment_line_id
AND jirtl.tax_id = jitc.tax_id
AND aid.po_distribution_id = pod.po_distribution_id
AND aid.rcv_transaction_id = rt.transaction_id
AND aid.invoice_id = ai.invoice_id
AND ai.invoice_type_lookup_code = 'STANDARD'
AND ai.terms_id = att.term_id
AND att.term_id = atl.term_id
AND aip.invoice_id(+) = ai.invoice_id
AND aip.check_id = aca.check_id(+);
i am unable to identify the main cause, i know some tables are large , but how do i optimize it
I CAN SEND THE EXPLAIN PLAN ON EMAIL AS IT WONT GET DISPALYED HERE PROPERLY
database is 10g and OS is HP UX 11.11
the query runs perfectly on 9i
Edited by: user7864753 on Dec 4, 2009 2:55 PM

>
database is 10g and OS is HP UX 11.11
the query runs perfectly on 9iDid you compare 9i and 10g plan ?
What changed ?
Was the DB migrated ? How ?
Were statistics recalculated ?
>
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 547 | 1224 (4)|
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 31 | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | JA_IN_RECEIPT_TAX_LINES | 1 | 31 | 4 (0)|
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | JA_IN_RECEIPT_TAX_LINES_N2 | 4 | | 3 (0)|
| 4 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1 | 547 | 1224 (4)|
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 547 | 1223 (4)|
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 543 | 1223 (4)|
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 527 | 1220 (4)|
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 491 | 1219 (4)|
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 473 | 1216 (4)|
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 465 | 1214 (4)|
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 460 | 1213 (4)|
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 400 | 1211 (4)|
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 388 | 1204 (4)|
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 376 | 1203 (4)|
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 364 | 1202 (4)|
| 16 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 351 | 1200 (4)|
| 17 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 297 | 1192 (4)|
| 18 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 274 | 1190 (4)|
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 1050 | 1185 (4)|
| 20 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 985 | 1180 (4)|
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 935 | 1175 (4)|
| 22 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 885 | 1170 (4)|
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 954 | 1158 (4)|
|* 24 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 684 | 1029 (4)|
|* 25 | HASH JOIN | | 29 | 3045 | 898 (4)|
|* 26 | HASH JOIN | | 7077 | 483K| 90 (6)|
| 27 | VIEW | index$_join$_010 | 4217 | 123K| 57 (4)|
|* 28 | HASH JOIN | | | | |
| 29 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | PO_VENDORS_U1 | 4217 | 123K| 19 (0)|
| 30 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | PO_VENDORS_U2 | 4217 | 123K| 37 (3)|
| 31 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | JA_IN_PO_VENDOR_SITES | 7077 | 276K| 32 (7)|
| 32 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PO_HEADERS_ALL | 52500 | 1794K| 805 (4)|
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 33 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | KPM_IGE_PURCHASE_ORDERS | 10824 | 97416 | 130 (3)|
| 34 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | KPM_IGE_SECURITY_DETAILS | 14910 | 655K| 128 (4)|
|* 35 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL | 1 | 18 | 3 (0)|
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_N3 | 4 | | 1 (0)|
| 37 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL | 1 | 10 | 1 (0)|
|* 38 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 39 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL | 1 | 10 | 1 (0)|
|* 40 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PO_REQUISITION_LINES_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 41 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)|
|* 42 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
|* 43 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_LINES_ALL | 1 | 64 | 1 (0)|
|* 44 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PO_LINES_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 45 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B | 1 | 23 | 2 (0)|
|* 46 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 | 1 | | 1 (0)|
|* 47 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RCV_TRANSACTIONS | 1 | 54 | 8 (0)|
|* 48 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | RCV_TRANSACTIONS_N5 | 7 | | 2 (0)|
| 49 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)|
|* 50 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_N1 | 2 | | 1 (0)|
|* 51 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RCV_SHIPMENT_LINES | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)|
|* 52 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | RCV_SHIPMENT_LINES_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 53 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)|
|* 54 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
|* 55 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL | 1 | 12 | 7 (0)|
|* 56 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_N17 | 7 | | 2 (0)|
|* 57 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | AP_INVOICES_ALL | 1 | 60 | 2 (0)|
|* 58 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | AP_INVOICES_U1 | 1 | | 1 (0)|
|* 59 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | AP_TERMS_TL_U1 | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)|
| 60 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | AP_TERMS_LINES | 2 | 16 | 2 (0)|
|* 61 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | AP_TERMS_LINES_U1 | 2 | | 1 (0)|
| 62 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_ALL | 1 | 18 | 3 (0)|
|* 63 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_N1 | 1 | | 2 (0)|
| 64 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | AP_CHECKS_ALL | 1 | 36 | 1 (0)|
|* 65 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | AP_CHECKS_U1 | 1 | | 0 (0)|
| 66 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | JA_IN_RECEIPT_TAX_LINES | 1 | 16 | 3 (0)|
|* 67 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | JA_IN_RECEIPT_TAX_LINES_N2 | 4 | | 2 (0)|
|* 68 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | JA_IN_TAX_CODES_U1 | 1 | 4 | 0 (0)|
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("J"."TAX_NAME" LIKE 'PO%Freight%')
3 - access("J"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID"=:B1 AND "J"."SHIPMENT_LINE_ID"=:B2)
23 - access("ISD"."IGE_HEADER_ID"="IPO"."IGE_HEADER_ID")
24 - access("IPO"."PO_HEADER_ID"="PH"."PO_HEADER_ID")
25 - access("PH"."VENDOR_ID"="PV"."VENDOR_ID" AND "PH"."VENDOR_SITE_ID"="PVS"."VENDOR_SITE_ID")
26 - access("PV"."VENDOR_ID"="PVS"."VENDOR_ID")
28 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
33 - filter("IPO"."PO_HEADER_ID" IS NOT NULL)
35 - filter("POD"."REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID" IS NOT NULL)
36 - access("PH"."PO_HEADER_ID"="POD"."PO_HEADER_ID")
38 - access("POD"."REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID"="PORD"."DISTRIBUTION_ID")
40 - access("PORD"."REQUISITION_LINE_ID"="PORL"."REQUISITION_LINE_ID")
42 - access("PORL"."REQUISITION_HEADER_ID"="PORH"."REQUISITION_HEADER_ID")
43 - filter("PH"."PO_HEADER_ID"="PL"."PO_HEADER_ID")
44 - access("PL"."PO_LINE_ID"="POD"."PO_LINE_ID")
46 - access("PL"."ITEM_ID"="MSI"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID" AND "MSI"."ORGANIZATION_ID"=136)
47 - filter("RT"."TRANSACTION_TYPE"='RECEIVE' AND "RT"."PO_HEADER_ID"="PL"."PO_HEADER_ID")
48 - access("RT"."PO_LINE_ID"="PL"."PO_LINE_ID")
50 - access("PL"."PO_LINE_ID"="PLL"."PO_LINE_ID")
51 - filter("RT"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID"="RSL"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID")
52 - access("RT"."SHIPMENT_LINE_ID"="RSL"."SHIPMENT_LINE_ID")
54 - access("RSH"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID"="RSL"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID")
55 - filter("AID"."PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID" IS NOT NULL AND
"AID"."PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID"="POD"."PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID")
56 - access("AID"."RCV_TRANSACTION_ID"="RT"."TRANSACTION_ID")
filter("AID"."RCV_TRANSACTION_ID" IS NOT NULL)
57 - filter("AI"."INVOICE_TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE"='STANDARD')
58 - access("AID"."INVOICE_ID"="AI"."INVOICE_ID")
59 - access("AI"."TERMS_ID"="ATT"."TERM_ID")
61 - access("ATT"."TERM_ID"="ATL"."TERM_ID")
63 - access("AIP"."INVOICE_ID"="AI"."INVOICE_ID")
65 - access("AIP"."CHECK_ID"="ACA"."CHECK_ID")
67 - access("RSL"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID"="JIRTL"."SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID" AND
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
"RSL"."SHIPMENT_LINE_ID"="JIRTL"."SHIPMENT_LINE_ID")
68 - access("JIRTL"."TAX_ID"="JITC"."TAX_ID")
Note
- 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
117 rows selected.

Dump_area_size is unlimited but Enterprise manager showing 57% full in

Hi,
I am working on oracle 10g 10.2.0.1 on Linux 32 bit, In Enterprise manager it is showing Dump Area used (%) 60%, when i removed all of my trace file from bdump,cdump,dpdump,adump. My archive log files are also in this dump area, so i removed most of archice and from rman delete expired archivelog too.
But it is still showing 57%
When i look at parameter MAX_DUMP_FILE_SIZE=unlimited
Then why there is a full % IN Enterprise Manager

Type of Dump area Dump area directory Total Dump area Dump area used
Dump area used% Free Dump area
background /u01/app/oracle/admin/test4/bdump 69171924 37290596 57
31881328
core /u01/app/oracle/admin/test4/cdump 69171924 37290596 57 31881328
user /u01/app/oracle/admin/test4/udump 69171924 37290596 57 31881328
Can we change the the dump area size and if we let it reach 100%, what will be the consequences, whether Oracle database automatically delete the older one or database will not be available for use

Temp tablespace 99%full

What are the suggestion for temp tablespace, if its 99%full, should we keep adding space in it or it will use existing space?
TABLESPACE TOTAL_MB USED_MB FREE_MB PCT_USED GRAPH (X=5%)
TEMP 17,500.00 17,444.00 56.00 99.68 [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-]

Hi,
>>What are the suggestion for temp tablespace, if its 99%full, should we keep adding space in it or it will use existing space?
I think that you don't need worry about, unless you're receiving some ORA- error about out of space in TEMP tablespace. You can see below an SQL output from a database used here in my company for development and tests purposes. The database is up uninterruptedly by 7 months and the space size for the TEMP tablespace have been configured to use 900 MB.
LEGATTI@ORACLE10> SELECT tablespace_name, SUM(bytes_used), SUM(bytes_free)
2 FROM   V$temp_space_header
3 GROUP BY tablespace_name;
TABLESPACE_NAME                SUM(BYTES_USED) SUM(BYTES_FREE)
TEMP                                 943718400               0Cheers
Legatti

Temp tablespace 98% full

Hy
My temp tablespace (1 GB) is 98% full.
A.)How can I find out which user uses at a certain point of time in percent the tablespace.
B.)Does a full temp tablespace lead to performance problems reduces the "reply velocity" of a database
lutz
null

Lutz,
a) By using the following query you can determine who are all the users who have created their objects in TEMP tablespace..
SQL> SELECT OWNER, SEGMENT_NAME, SEGMENT_TYPE
from dba_segments
where tablespace_name like 'TEMP';
Once u get the names of the objects u can move to the tablespace u want.
b). According to me YES. Try to restart the database after moving the objects if any.. and this should give some space to u.
There is a bug in 8.1.6 related to the use of TEMP tablespace while using the sort operations.. Check it if u r using 8.1.6
Hope this helps,
Shiva
null

Temp Tablespace Extent Management and workarea_size_policy / sort_area_size

So, in the past (8i etc) we used to size temporary tablespace like (n*sort_area_size) + db_block_size.
Now in 9i / 10g we have the workarea_size_policy setting and pga_aggregate_target. How would we set extent sizes for the temporary tablespace? We let Oracle control the areasize parameters on the fly.
Any suggestions out there? Typically, I like 1MB for no particular reason other than it matches my stripe size on the underlying disk. However, oracle will only write in chunks of your sort_area_size.
Are there any guidelines out there where we can guess at what Oracle will use for the Sort_area_size?
Thanks,
BradW

Thanks. I realize that. The only thing I was wondering about is what to set the extent sizes to be for the locally managed temp tablespace.
I was curious what Oracle will set the sort_area_size to be during run time with in the PGA aggregate we specify....
Just curious on the internal mechanisms so that I can tweak my temp tablespace a little bit.
Thanks,
BradW

Oracle (R) Enterprise Manager Console Version 9.2.0.1.0 Error?

Hi
I just took over from someone the role of a DBA and I would like to clarify an issue I saw in Oracle (R) Enterprise Manager Console Version 9.2.0.1.0 Production.
My Default Temporary Tablespace, TEMP.DBF is currently sized at 6144 MB, Used size is 6140 MB, 99.93% with full auto extend on.
Automatically extend datafile when full (Auto extend) 20480 K Bytes.
Maximum Size - 8192 K Bytes. (------> Issue to clarify here<------)
I think most probably my ex-staff clicked wrongly and chose "K Bytes". It should be "M Bytes". However, I would like to know how is it possible that OEM console Version 9.2.0.1.0 allows the Maximum Size (8192 K Bytes) to be below 6144 MB? Is this allowed? If so and left uncheck, what will the repercussion be on the TEMP tablespace?
Has anyone ever come across this issue?
Regards
Hahnhahnhahn

See an small example below
"Tablespace Created"
SQL> create temporary tablespace temp_test tempfile 'C:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\CKPT\temp_test01.tmp' size 100m autoextend on
next 10m maxsize 200m;
Tablespace created.
SQL>
"check below size, user bytes,maxsize"
TABLESPACE_NAME                FILE_NAME                                                    BYTES/1024/1024 USER_BYTES/1024/1024 MAXBYTES/1024/1024 AUT
TEMP_TEST                      C:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\CKPT\TEMP_TEST01.TMP                            "100                      99                200" YES
SQL>
"Now resized to more than maxsize so further maxsize supprssed"
SQL> alter database tempfile 'C:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\CKPT\TEMP_TEST01.TMP' resize 250m;
Database altered.
SQL> select tablespace_name,file_name,bytes/1024/1024,user_bytes/1024/1024,maxbytes/1024/1024,autoextensible from dba_temp_files where tablespace_name='TEMP_TEST';
TABLESPACE_NAME                FILE_NAME                                                    BYTES/1024/1024 USER_BYTES/1024/1024 MAXBYTES/1024/1024 AUT
TEMP_TEST                      C:\ORACLE\APP\ORADATA\CKPT\TEMP_TEST01.TMP                            "250                     249                200 YES"
SQL>
Now Bytes is more than Maxsize , its common behaviour of oracle database. When you resize tempfile, you have to again mention what is the maxsize.

TEMP tablespace is always full in Enterprise Manager

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for