The bounding box is too big

I have a bounding box that is 6in wide x 4 in height. the image that i have on that box is 4in wide by 4 in height. I have tried with the transform tool but it also
scales down the picture. I just want my picture to be 4in width by 4 in height

Might this image object be masked or grouped with other objects?
If push come to shove, just create a box at the right size, as a helper guide, then center your misbehaving image object on top of it and transform it, keep it centered as you do. Trial and error until done.

Similar Messages

Why are my Illustrator images getting thicker strokes when I take the bounding box and make them smaller?

Why are my Illustrator images getting thicker strokes when I take the bounding box and make them smaller? This has never happened to me. I'm not an expert at Illustrator, but I do know some fundamentals.

Thank you for responding so quickly. No apologies necessary - I know this Forum isn't McDonalds - don't expect an answer to be served up right away. You helped me out with a big issue yesterday.
I am using a mac - OSX 10.7.5
I have Adobe Creative Suites - CS5 - Illustrator version is 15.0.2
The contents I am placing are all Vector - Illustrator files
But, I wonder about some of the vector files I work with. Could a "line weight/thickness" be 'assigned' to the drawing and screw things up? I used 'simple' linear (line) drawings from SolidWorks that have been converted to ai files. It's just weird because I checked the stroke of the drawing and it's not out of line.
I am attaching part of some box labels. You can see how the drawings, of the products, on the 'left side' are "thick" after embedding them. I think the "Global Logo" was pasted into a template not linked that's why it's okay. But look at the Quiet Thunder logo - it looks terrible. These labels are only 2.25" X 6.5", so its important I keep the images lightweight.
Your help is very much appreciated. Thank you!

Can PB can calcute the bounding box as the needed region in AE?

Hi,
I wrote many small pixel bender that I use mainly in AE. However I need them to be as efficient as possible, so I wonder if Pixel Bender can obtain the bounding box of an image input as the needed region. This way, it will not calculate an entire frame when there is only a few pixels in the frame.
Thanks
Jocelyn Tremblay

Hi,
I did a major breakthrough by rethinking the model. Now I get a real speed improvment, and if the image is fully opaque, there is not too much drawback.
Instead of a simple bounding box, I'm creating a grid in which each cell represent a region of the source and is float4(1). if there is any non-zero transparent pixel. In the last kernel of the graph, i'm processing only when the corresponding value in the grid is float4(1.). I get really efficient results from that. I'm including two graphs. A basic one with a fixed grid of 16px (I didn't do any beanchmark for the grid size) where I output the original image composited over the scaled grid in green. The second one, where the last kernel is a box blur, the grid size equal the blur radius, and there is a convolution kernel between the grid and the box blur that expand the grid to fit the blur.
GridExperience.pbg
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<graph name = "GridExperience" xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/PixelBenderGraph/1.0">
    <metadata name = "namespace" value = "com.jocelyntremblay"/>
    <metadata name = "vendor" value = "Jocelyn Tremblay" />
    <metadata name = "version" type = "int" value = "1" />
    
    <inputImage type = "image4" name = "src" />
    <outputImage type = "image4" name = "dst" />
    
    <parameter type="float2" name="sourceSize" >
        <metadata name="minValue" type="float2" value="1"/>
        <metadata name="maxValue" type="float2" value="4096" />
        <metadata name="defaultValue" type="float2" value="634., 396." />
        <metadata name="aeUIControl" value="aePoint" />
        <metadata name="aePointRelativeDefaultValue" type="float2" value="1, 1" />
    </parameter>
        
    <parameter type="float" name="gridSize" >
        <metadata name="minValue" type="float" value="1"/>
        <metadata name="maxValue" type="float" value="64" />
        <metadata name="defaultValue" type="float" value="16" />
    </parameter>
     
     <kernel>
      <![CDATA[
         <languageVersion : 1.0;>
         kernel getProcessingGrid
         <
            namespace:"com.jocelyntremblay";
            vendor:"Jocelyn Tremblay";
            version:1;
         >{
            input image4 src;
            output float4 dst;
            parameter float2 sourceSize
            <
                parameterType : "inputSize";
                inputSizeName : "src";
            >;
            parameter float gridSize
            <
                minValue:float(1.0);
                maxValue:float(64.0);
                defaultValue:float(5.0);
            >;
            region changed(region inputRegion, imageRef inputIndex){
                return region(float4(0, 0, ceil(sourceSize.x/gridSize), ceil(sourceSize.y/gridSize)));
            void evaluatePixel(){
                float j;
                float4 pix;
                dst = float4(0.0);
                for (float i = 0.; i < gridSize; i++){
                    j = 0.;
                    for (j; j < gridSize; j++){
                        pix = sampleNearest(src, float2(floor(outCoord().x) * gridSize + i, floor(outCoord().y) * gridSize + j));
                        if (pix.a > 0.){
                            dst = float4(1.0);
                            i = j = gridSize;
      ]]>
     </kernel>
     <kernel>
      <![CDATA[
         <languageVersion : 1.0;>
         kernel drawProcessingGrid
         <
            namespace:"com.jocelyntremblay";
            vendor:"Jocelyn Tremblay";
            version:1;
         >{
            input image4 src;
            input image4 processingGrid;
            output float4 dst;
            parameter float gridSize
            <
                minValue:float(1.0);
                maxValue:float(64.0);
                defaultValue:float(5.0);
            >;
            void evaluatePixel(){
                float4 gridSegment = sampleNearest(processingGrid, float2(floor(outCoord().x/gridSize), floor(outCoord().y/gridSize)));
                if (gridSegment.a > 0.){
                                //process
                                dst = float4(0., 1., 0., 1.);
                                float4 tt = sampleNearest(src, outCoord());
                                if(tt.a > 0.){
                                    dst.rgb = tt.rgb;
                else{
                    //do not process
                    dst = float4(0.);
      ]]>
     </kernel>
    
    <node id = "getProcessingGrid" name ="getProcessingGrid" namespace = "com.jocelyntremblay" vendor = "Jocelyn Tremblay" version ="1">
    <evaluateParameters>
            <![CDATA[void evaluateParameters() {
                getProcessingGrid::gridSize = gridSize;
                getProcessingGrid::sourceSize = sourceSize;
            }]]>
        </evaluateParameters>
    </node>
    <node id = "drawProcessingGrid" name ="drawProcessingGrid" namespace = "com.jocelyntremblay" vendor = "Jocelyn Tremblay" version ="1">
    <evaluateParameters>
            <![CDATA[void evaluateParameters() {
                drawProcessingGrid::gridSize = gridSize;
            }]]>
        </evaluateParameters>
    </node>
    
    <connect fromImage = "src" toNode = "getProcessingGrid" toInput = "src" />
    <connect fromImage = "src" toNode = "drawProcessingGrid" toInput = "src" />
    <connect fromNode = "getProcessingGrid" fromOutput = "dst" toNode = "drawProcessingGrid" toInput = "processingGrid" />
    <connect fromNode = "drawProcessingGrid" fromOutput = "dst" toImage = "dst" />
</graph>
GridExperienceBoxBlur.pbg
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<graph name = "GridExperienceBoxBlur" xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/PixelBenderGraph/1.0">
    <metadata name = "namespace" value = "com.jocelyntremblay"/>
    <metadata name = "vendor" value = "Jocelyn Tremblay" />
    <metadata name = "version" type = "int" value = "1" />
    
    <inputImage type = "image4" name = "src" />
    <outputImage type = "image4" name = "dst" />
    
    <parameter type="float2" name="sourceSize" >
        <metadata name="minValue" type="float2" value="1"/>
        <metadata name="maxValue" type="float2" value="4096" />
        <metadata name="defaultValue" type="float2" value="1920., 720." />
        <metadata name="aeUIControl" value="aePoint" />
        <metadata name="aePointRelativeDefaultValue" type="float2" value="1, 1" />
    </parameter>
    <parameter type="float" name="blurRadius" >
        <metadata name="minValue" type="float" value="0"/>
        <metadata name="maxValue" type="float" value="25" />
        <metadata name="defaultValue" type="float" value="5" />
    </parameter>
     
     <kernel>
      <![CDATA[
         <languageVersion : 1.0;>
         kernel getProcessingGrid
         <
            namespace:"com.jocelyntremblay";
            vendor:"Jocelyn Tremblay";
            version:1;
         >{
            input image4 src;
            output float4 dst;
            parameter float2 sourceSize
            <
                parameterType : "inputSize";
                inputSizeName : "src";
            >;
            parameter float gridSize
            <
                minValue:float(1.0);
                maxValue:float(64.0);
                defaultValue:float(16.0);
            >;
            region changed(region inputRegion, imageRef inputIndex){
                return region(float4(0, 0, ceil(sourceSize.x/gridSize), ceil(sourceSize.y/gridSize)));
            void evaluatePixel(){
                float j;
                float4 pix;
                dst = float4(0.0);
                for (float i = 0.; i < gridSize; i++){
                    j = 0.;
                    for (j; j < gridSize; j++){
                        pix = sampleNearest(src, float2(floor(outCoord().x) * gridSize + i, floor(outCoord().y) * gridSize + j));
                        if (pix.a > 0.){
                            dst = float4(1.0);
                            i = j = gridSize;
      ]]>
     </kernel>
     <kernel>
      <![CDATA[
         <languageVersion : 1.0;>
        kernel ConvKernel
        <
        namespace: "After Effects";
        vendor : "Adobe Systems Inc.";
        version : 1;
        description : "Convolves an image using a smoothing mask";
        >
            input image4 source;
            output pixel4 result;
            const float3x3 smooth_mask = float3x3( 1.0, 1.0, 1.0,
            1.0, 1.0, 1.0,
            1.0, 1.0, 1.0);
            const float smooth_divisor = 9.0;
            float4 convolve(float3x3 in_kernel, float divisor) {
                float4 conv_result = float4(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
                float2 out_coord = outCoord();
                for(int i = -1; i <= 1; ++i) {
                    for(int j = -1; j <= 1; ++j) {
                        conv_result += sampleNearest(source,
                        out_coord + float2(i, j)) * in_kernel[i + 1][j + 1];
                conv_result /= divisor;
                return conv_result;
            void evaluatePixel() {
                float4 conv_result = convolve(smooth_mask, smooth_divisor);
                result = conv_result;
            region needed( region output_region, imageRef input_index ) {
                region result = output_region;
                result = outset( result, float2( 1.0, 1.0 ) );
                return result;
            region changed( region input_region, imageRef input_index ) {
                region result = input_region;
                result = outset( result, float2( 1.0, 1.0 ) );
                return result;
        } //kernel ends
        ]]>
      </kernel>
      <kernel>
      <![CDATA[
         <languageVersion : 1.0;>
            kernel BasicBoxBlur
            <   namespace : "AIF";
                vendor : "Adobe Systems";
                version : 2;
                description : "variable Radius Box Blur"; >
            input image4 src;
            input image4 processingGrid;
            output float4 dst;
            parameter float blurRadius
            <
                minValue:float(0.0);
                maxValue:float(25.0);
                defaultValue:float(5.0);
            >;
            dependent int radiusAsInt;
            void evaluateDependents(){
                radiusAsInt = int(ceil(blurRadius));
            parameter float gridSize
            <
                minValue:float(1.0);
                maxValue:float(64.0);
                defaultValue:float(16.0);
            >;
            region needed(region outputRegion, imageRef inputRef){
                float2 singlePixel = pixelSize(src);
                return outset(outputRegion, float2(singlePixel.x * ceil(blurRadius), singlePixel.y * ceil(blurRadius)));
            region changed(region inputRegion, imageRef inputRef){
                float2 singlePixel = pixelSize(src);
                return outset(inputRegion, float2(singlePixel.x * ceil(blurRadius), singlePixel.y * ceil(blurRadius)));
            void evaluatePixel(){
                float4 gridSegment = sampleNearest(processingGrid, float2(floor(outCoord().x/gridSize), floor(outCoord().y/gridSize)));
                if (gridSegment.a > 0.){
                    float denominator = 0.0;
                    float4 colorAccumulator = float4(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
                    float2 singlePixel = pixelSize(src);
                    for(int i = -radiusAsInt; i <= radiusAsInt; i++)
                        for(int j = -radiusAsInt; j <= radiusAsInt; j++)
                            colorAccumulator += sampleNearest(src,
                                outCoord() + float2(float(i) * singlePixel.x, float(j) * singlePixel.y));
                            denominator++;
                    dst = colorAccumulator / denominator;
                else{
                    //do not process
                    dst = float4(0.);
      ]]>
     </kernel>
    
    <node id = "getProcessingGrid" name ="getProcessingGrid" namespace = "com.jocelyntremblay" vendor = "Jocelyn Tremblay" version ="1">
    <evaluateParameters>
            <![CDATA[void evaluateParameters() {
                getProcessingGrid::sourceSize = sourceSize;
                getProcessingGrid::gridSize = max(1., blurRadius);
            }]]>
        </evaluateParameters>
    </node>
    <node id = "ConvKernel" name ="ConvKernel" namespace = "After Effects" vendor = "Adobe Systems Inc." version ="1"></node>
    <node id = "BasicBoxBlur" name ="BasicBoxBlur" namespace = "AIF" vendor = "Adobe Systems" version ="2">
    <evaluateParameters>
            <![CDATA[void evaluateParameters() {
                BasicBoxBlur::blurRadius = blurRadius;
                BasicBoxBlur::gridSize = max(1., blurRadius);
            }]]>
        </evaluateParameters>
    </node>
    
    <connect fromImage = "src" toNode = "getProcessingGrid" toInput = "src" />
    <connect fromImage = "src" toNode = "BasicBoxBlur" toInput = "src" />
    <connect fromNode = "getProcessingGrid" fromOutput = "dst" toNode = "ConvKernel" toInput = "source" />
    <connect fromNode = "ConvKernel" fromOutput = "result" toNode = "BasicBoxBlur" toInput = "processingGrid" />
    <connect fromNode = "BasicBoxBlur" fromOutput = "dst" toImage = "dst" />
</graph>

My CS3/PS has started to change the cursor into a line of three VERY small icons when dragged over a picture or menu. Thus it is VERY difficult for instance to drag a layer in the layer list to the wastebasket - the cursor simply is too big for the waiste

My CS3/PS has started to change the cursor into a line of three VERY small icons when dragged over a picture or menu. Thus it is VERY difficult for instance to drag a layer in the layer list to the wastebasket - the cursor simply is too big for the waistebasket icon. Even all other exact work is impossible. Of course I have checked all the cursor presets but nothing seems to help. My OS is Windows7.

Have you tried resetting Preferences?
A logical next step would be to reset your Preferences.
To reset Preferences:
If Photoshop is already open on your screen, close it (Quit). Then hold down Shift+Ctrl+Alt (Win) / Shift+Command+Option (Mac) on your keyboard and start Photoshop.
A dialog box will pop up asking if you want to delete the existing Preferences file (the "Settings"). Click Yes in the dialog box. The existing Preferences file will be scrapped and a new one will be created.

Bounding box area too large for interactive button

Hello all,
I am new to InDesign interactive part and I'm creating my first ever interactive file. So the problem is that I have one path (which is a diagonal line basically) made into a button that should work on roll over mode. Now the the bounding box area is so large around it and it will react already when it shouldn't (when the mouse touches the bounding box area).
Is there a way how to manipulate with the empty bounding box area so it wouldn't react or should everything be made of squares?
Cheers,
Egert

Hey guys, thanks for the replys.
Bob's idea definately works. I am thinking of creating a line of buttons and then creating a group of them so they should react as "one" button.
And I just tried Manish-Sharma's thing too and it seems to be helping aswell. The bounding box is way smaller if I draw the button as horizontal as possible and I rotate it once created into a button.
Thanks guys!

Forcing onPress to react on the exact shape, rather then on the bounding box

If I have a clip with an imported image then clip.onPress
reacts on the
bounding box of the clip rather then on the exact shape of
the imported
image even if the imported image has a transparent
background.
To make it to react to in image shape only I have to use
Trace BitMap which
results in deterioration of the image quality and if the clip
is moving,
Trace BitMap also slows down computer perfprmance.
Is there other technique to make onPress to react on the
exact shape, rather
then on the bounding box?

An image is always rectangular, it just may have transparent
parts. So an MC containing an image is always as big as the whole
image (at least).
You could use the MovieClip.hitArea property, and create
another MC inside your clip that specifies the active area for
mouse clicks. This is easy if you have the image loaded into the
clip inside the Flash IDE.
If it's loaded on runtime, you might use the BitmapData class
(if you use Flash 8) to get the pixel value of the image at the
position where the image was clicked, check if it's transparent or
opaque, and decide whether to call the onPress action or not.
hth,
blemmo

I have 4 equal oblong shape created with borders How do I go about knowing what size the selection area is so that I can crop an image to fit. I don't want to use paste in then adjust the bounding box to suit

I have 4 equal oblong shape created with borders How do I go about knowing what size the selection area is so that I can crop an image to fit. I don't want to use paste in then adjust the bounding box to suit

What do you mean a moderator

In photoshop elements 13, the bounding box is very light and hard to see. Can this be darkened?

In photoshop elements 13, the bounding box is very light and hard to see. Is there anyway that this can be darkened?

When my wife first logs in, this is the screen that comes up:
So we hit "Continue" and the next screen comes up:
So then we click "This is Okay" and the next screen comes up:
It doesn't matter what we select here; the next screen is always the following:
And here is where it dead ends. There's no place to enter an alternate name under 40 characters, there's nothing to click on. And this has been happening every time my wife has tried to log in.

Is there an adapter to hook up a firewire from a cannon gl2 to a MacBook Pro? The firewire end is too big to fit in the MacBook Pro laptop help.

Is there an adapter to hook up a firewire from a cannon gl2 to a MacBook Pro? The firewire end is too big to fit in the MacBook Pro laptop help.

After identifying the exact connectors you need, check the Apple Store online and/or eBay...you should be able to buy a cable with the correct connector on each end, rather than fooling with an adapter.

I am making a book in iPhoto using a double page spread and blank layout. I can't find a way to minimize the picture. it is too big in all the themes. I seems like there must be a way to shrink it not just zoom to make it fit?

I am making a book in iPhoto using a double page spread and blank layout. I can't find a way to minimize the picture. it is too big in all the themes. I seems like there must be a way to shrink it not just zoom to make it fit?

Command (right) - click on the photo and select Fit to Frame in the contextual menu:
Not all frames in a theme offer that feature but most do. The spread layout doesn't.
OT

Could not complete your request because the result would be too big - cs3

I exported 1.32 minute of quicktime movie file from FCP into photoshop CS3 about five weeks ago. Since then I've been diligently working on each individual frame. I've about 10 seconds left to the end of file. Unfortunately, I turned off my mac two nights ago and I can no longer open the file. The message says "could not complete your request because the result would be too big". The file size is 1.16 GB and saved as .psd. I'm working on Mac OS X 10.5.8. Any suggestion or solution would be appreciated.

Thanks c.pfaffenbichler! I did the command-alt-shift and I also increased the RAM in Performance-Preferences from 1963 (69%) to 1782 (90%). I got the same message. I've to admit that I'm not very technique about Photoshop. I'll have to search for the answers to your other questions. Such as the set up for the Scratch Discs, optimizing and System Maintenance? Your assistant would still be appreciated.
c.pfaffenbichler
1,137 posts since
Feb 20, 2009
1. Dec 22, 2009 12:20 AM in response to: vejoe
Re: could not complete your request because the result would be too big - cs3
How are You set for RAM and Scratch Discs?
Have You tried optimizing Your Performance-Preferences yet?
As with all unexplainable Photoshop-problems You might try trashing the prefs (after making sure all customized settings like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved and making a note of the Preferences You’ve changed) by pressing command-alt-shift on starting the program and/or starting as a new User.
Other than that System Maintenance (repairing permissions, purging PRAM, running cron-scripts, etc.) should not do any damage either.

Could not complete the Move command because the result would be too big

trying to move a picture and I get "could not complete the Move command because the result would be too big". It is the only layer.

This is for version 13.1
I am getting this error as well. I am trying to combine an ~19,000x3600pixel photo with an ~10,000x3600 pixel photo. I created a blank file 30,000x4000pixel to put the 2 photos together. I paste the larger photo into the blank file and position it to the vert center and horiz left of the blank file. I then paste the smaller picture into the new file. It goes in at the center in its own layer as expected. As soon as I try to move it left or right I get the above error message. I can move it ALL the way left and it will stay.
Also if I just create the blank file and paste the larger file in it and move to the right or left by just a little (say with the cursor controls or mouse but move slightly) I get the error. If I move all the way left it stays. If I move all the way right it gives an error BUT if I select undo move and redo move it goes to the right and stays. I tried that with the small file but could not get it to stay right.
all 3 are 72px/in

Changing the bounding box size

When I go to print an image in Photoshop CC, a dialogue box appears and on the left-hand side is the image to be printed. Bordering the image are small diagonal lines which I'm assuming are the bounding box. The distance between the edge of the page varies from side to side and I want to center the photo. I can't see how to do that.
Thanks.

The print dialog preview area show basically three areas. The Paper size the printer is set to and the sizes are displayed with numeric unites. If you see small diagonal lines these are showing the areas the printer can not print on with the current settings. With different printer setting this area may change for example if the printer support borderless the side non printable may go way but there still be some top and bottom non printable area. The Bottom non printable area may go away if you switch from sheet feed to roll paper feed. Inside the diagonal line is the printable area and inside that a bounding box of the image. If You check scale for media the image will be scaled to fit within the print area.

Why can't I see the bounding box for objects on the pasteboard?

Adobe CC sucks. Why last week was I able to see the bounding box of objects that I had on the pasteboard in InDesign CC, including objects that didn't contain anything yet, and now suddenly this week I can't see them?
It seems as though every week something inexplicably gets changed around. First Save As had no shortcut, then suddenly the shortcut is back, but it doesn't work.
Get it together Adobe. I don't want to be paying a subscription for a product that feels as though it's still in Beta mode.

Hi Steve,
Yes thanks, I don't think I was clear in what I wrote. I knew that they could be turned back on, but why did I open InDesign this morning to find my workspace/preferences different than how I left them on Friday?
And I know it isn't a case of my mistakenly turning off the frame edges, because the operator that sits next to me had the exact same thing happen to her copy of InDesign this morning also.
I understand the requirement to update things, but it really does feel as though I'm using software that is still in testing.

Scanning: The image size is too big. Please reduce the image height, width, resolution, scaling or output type.

Good Day.
I have recently discovered an issue with scanning. I have tried scanning straight from the printer, through image capture, and through preview. All yeilding the same results since they are essentailly kicking off the same scanning applet. I can scan a jpeg formatted file as long as I applet is in the "Hide Details" mode. If I click on the "Show Details" button, which I need to do to scan to PDF, I immediately receive an error stating: The image size is too big. Please reduce the image height, width, resolution, scaling or output type.
I'm currently using an HP C5180 printer.   The most recently installed software was Adobe Digital Editions (I installed this to read an on-line e-book). Not sure if there is any correlation.    Thanks for any help.
Mac details are:
Model Name:          MacBook Pro
Model Identifier:          MacBookPro8,1
Processor Name:          Intel Core i5
Processor Speed:          2.3 GHz
Number of Processors:          1
Total Number of Cores:          2
L2 Cache (per Core):          256 KB
L3 Cache:          3 MB
Memory:          8 GB
Boot ROM Version:          MBP81.0047.B27
Printer access log:
Source:          /var/log/cups/access_log
Size:          174 bytes
Last Modified:          11/21/12 10:09 PM
Recent Contents:          localhost - - [21/Nov/2012:22:09:16 -0500] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 200 61628 CUPS-Get-PPDs -
localhost - - [21/Nov/2012:22:09:20 -0500] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 200 61628 CUPS-Get-PPDs -
Image Capture Support:
Image Capture Support:
Path:          /Library/Image Capture/Support/Hewlett-Packard/Devices/HPAiOScan.bundle/Contents/Info.plist
Version:          2.3.0
Path:          /Library/Image Capture/Support/Hewlett-Packard/Devices/HPAiOScan.bundle/Contents/Resources/Dev iceInfo.plist
Version:          2.3.0
Photosmart C5100 series:
Status:          Idle
Print Server:          Local
Driver Version:          4.0.0
Default:          Yes
Shared:          No
URI:          dnssd://Photosmart%20C5100%20series%20%5B960B9E%5D._pdl-datastream._tcp.lo cal./?bidi
PPD:          HP Photosmart C5100 series
PPD File Version:          4.0.0
PostScript Version:          (3011.104) 0
CUPS Version:          1.6svn (cups-327)
Scanning support:          Yes
Scanning app (bundleID path):          -
Scanning app version:          -
Scanner UUID:          CC8DD435-CC8D-D435-CC8D-D435CC8DD435
Printer Commands:          ReportLevels
CUPS filters:
Inkjet:
Path:          /Library/Printers/hp/cups/Inkjet.driver/Contents/MacOS/Inkjet
Permissions:          rwxr-xr-x
Version:          4.0.0
commandtohp:
Path:          /Library/Printers/hp/cups/filters/commandtohp.filter/Contents/MacOS/comman dtohp
Permissions:          rwxr-xr-x
Version:          2.1.1
Fax support:          No
Printer utility:          /Library/Printers/hp/Utilities/HP Utility.app
Printer utility version:          5.9.1
PDEs:
PDE.plugin:
Sandbox compliant:          Yes

Hello Sig
The scanner works with a Windows computer, which proves the device is functional at a cursory level. The drivers are now distributed by Apple and this is an Apple computer. There is no scanning software provided by HP. HP's answer is that Mountain Lion takes care of all of this. I anticipate that some setting or driver was somehow tweaked since the scanner had been working with Mountain Lion until a few days ago. The device in question is an Apple product. So, I'm pretty confident that I'm in the right place.
Regards

The bounding box is too big

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for