The manner that JBuilder names for ejb isn't seem canon

Question

below is JBuilder auto produce
abstract public class LockerBean implements EntityBean{
public interface LockerHome extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome {
........} //"LockerHome" should correct "LockerLocalHome"
public interface LockerRemote extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {
...........}//"LockerRemote"should correct "Locker"
public interface LockerRemoteHome extends javax.ejb.EJBHome {
............}//"LockerRemoteHome"should correct "LockerHome"
but book says
remote interface names:<bean-name>Home
local interface:<bean-name>LocalHome
remote bean interface:<bean-name>
local bean interface<bean-name>Local
implementation classes:<bean-name>EJB
I have never seen <bean-name>Remote and <bean-name>RemoteHome
but JBuilder can compiler and run above class! why

Answer 1

From a compilation perspective,
It does not matter what you call the interfaces. You could call them larry, moe and curly for the different home interfaces.
All that matters is that they are indicated properly in the descriptors and used appropriately in the code.
Of course from a readability, usablility and maintainability perspective, use appropriate names.
What JBuilder does is a standard for JBuilder. (I think specifically the release of JBuilder you have)
It need not match what is there in your book.
Vijay