Tidal 6.1 Web GUI performance issues

Hello,
We are noticing significant delays in the Web GUI of Tidal 6.1. We tried all usual suspects like hardware size, logs, etc, etc. and still no improvement in performance. We have about 5000 jobs and our infrastructure is windows based. Does any of you experienced this problem and how did you address it?
thank you
Raj

We are a small shop (about 1,000 jobs) and we were extremely slow. I worked with one of the engineers and here are the changes we made that helped us a lot - we have 1 master (8 GB), one CM (12 GB), windows based, external Oracle DB. Pretty much these changes are based on size. Hope this helps somebody!
tes-6.1.dsp
*** changes made
CacheSynchronizer.StreamCommitSize from 1000 to 3000
DataCache.ReadConnectionsMin from 5 to 10
DataCache.ReadConnectionsMax from 10 to 15
DataCache.WriteConnectionsMin from 5 to 10
DataCache.WriteConnectionsMax from 10 to 15
DataCache.PageCacheSize from 16384 to 32768
DataCache.ConnectionPoolMinSize from 5 to 10
DataCache.ConnectionPoolMaxSize from 10 to 15
DataCache.StatementCacheSize from 750 to 1500
ClientNode.MinSessionPoolSize from 5 to 10
ClientNode.MaxSessionPoolSize from 10 to 15
Clientmgr.props
*** changes made
JVMARGS=-Xms8192m -Xmx8192m -XX:PermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m to
JVMARGS=-Xms10240m -Xmx10240m -XX:PermSize=1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m
ClientSession.MinSessionPoolSize from 5 to 10
ClientSession.MaxSessionPoolSize from 10 to 15
DataSource.MinSessionPoolSize from 5 to 10
DataSource.MaxSessionPoolSize from 10 to 15
Master.props
*** changes made
MessageBroker.MemoryLimit from 256 to 1024
MessageBroker.StoreLimit from 4096 to 12288
ClientConnection.MinSessionPoolSize from 5 to 10
ClientConnection.MaxSessionPoolSize from 10 to 15

Similar Messages

Webi Reports - Performance Issues

Hi Experts,
       Right now we are using BO XI R2 version. We have 2 servers, server 1 is old and server 2 is new (AIX server u2013 new upgrade of old server).
      When I trying to schedule the report (webi) in both server, reports is running successfully. But problem is that the report scheduling time is more in new server (AIX) than old server (Server1).
There is some performance issues
Example:
Old serve     : 1 hrs (time taken)
New server : 2 hrs (time taken)
Could you please tell me how to increase the webi report performance in new server?
Regards,
Sridharan Krishnan

Hi,
How to enable Excel and Pdf option under Save as file in infoview.
When i trying to click modify option under public folder reports ,Report is getting open but i am not able to save that report as excel or pdf , since those option is disabled in infoview.
But it is enabled in user private folder Reports.
Right now we have upgraded the objects from XI R2 to BO 3.1, Since there is some difference in security rights in 3.1, Please tell me how to fix it.
BO Version u2013 3.1
Regards,
Sridharan

Webi Report Performance issue as compared with backaend SAP BW as

Hi
We are having Backend as SAP BW.
Dashboard and Webi reports are created with Backend SAP BW.
i.e thru Universe on top of Bex query and then webi report and then dashboard thru live office.
My point is that when we have created webi reprts with date range as parameter(sometimes as mandatory variable which comes as prompt in webi) or sometimes taking L 01 Calender date from Bex and creating a prompt in webi, we are facing that reports are taking lot of time to open. 5 minutes 10 minutes and sometimes 22 minutes to open.
This type of problem never ocurred when Backened was Oracle.
Also when drilling in webi report,it takes lot of time .
So can you suggest any solution?

Hi Gaurav,
We logged this issue with support already, it is acknowledged.
What happens is that whenever you use an infoobject in the condition
(so pull in the object into condition and build a condition there,
or use that object in a filter object in the universe and then use the filter)
this will result in that object being added to the result set.
Since the query will retrieve a lot of different calendar days for the period you selected,
the resultset will be VERY big and performance virtually non-existent.
The workaround we used is to use a BEX variable for all date based selections.
One optional range variable makes it possible to build various types of selections
(less (with a very early startdate), greater (with a very far in the future enddate) and between).
Because the range selection is now handled by BEX, the calendar day will not be part of the selection...
Good luck!
Marianne

WEB Gui logon issue.

Dear Support,
I've activated the SAP Webgui and it is working fine. The problem is that the username and password textboxes on login screen are disabled with a message 'via popup' and when i click logon a popup ask me for the username and password. I want to enable these textboxes so that despite a popup occur user can input their information directly on logon page.
Please help me to resolve this issue. Thanks in advance
With best regards,
Basis Team

Dear Edgar,
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply. I've made the settings you specify and now the text boxes are visible. but when i enter username and password and press logon button then it give me the following error:
"Erorr start here
The URL http://172.16.100.180:8000/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/webgui was not called due to an error.
Note
The following error text was processed in the system T01 : Communication failure
The error occurred on the application server ideskesc_T01_00 and in the work process 0 .
The termination type was: IMC_CANCEL_TX
The ABAP call stack was:
      Method: IF_HTTP_EXTENSION~HANDLE_REQUEST of program CL_HTTP_EXT_ITS===============CP
      Method: EXECUTE_REQUEST of program CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP
      Function: HTTP_DISPATCH_REQUEST of program SAPLHTTP_RUNTIME
      Module: %_HTTP_START of program SAPMHTTP
Error ends here".
Please help and guide me to resolve this issue.
Thanks a lot.
Basis Team.
Edited by: Basis team on Jun 19, 2009 9:06 AM

Accessing BPEL processes via a proxy web service performance issues

Hello,
I have more BPEL processes implemented, each such a process implementing business functionality in a certain domain (generally, a domain has more business processes).
The request was to provide a single web service for each domain. It means that all the business methods (processes) in the same domain should be accessed through the same web service. This request doesn't make possible to expose the BPEL processes themselves as web services that could be directly consumed by different clients of the application.
The alternative will be to implement the "domain" web services through a Java class, for instance. With this approach, the Java based domain web services will expose the needed business methods to the clients. And the Java class will get the request input parameters and will call the corresponding BPEL process via SOAP. This scenario would be fine, but... this approach would imply a supplementary marshalling/unmarshalling process at the domain web service level. The data returned by the BPEL processes could be very large and in such a situation the Java based domain web service will introduce an important performance drawback.
Is there any other solution to this case that will allow the using of a "proxy" domain web services that will not introduce any important drawback via marshalling/unmarshalling?
Many thanks in advance!
Regards,
Marinel

Hello,
First, thank you Sandor for your answer.
I understand that it is possible to create a BPEL process that exposes multiple operations/messages. This would be exactly what I need: a single process (web service) that will expose many operations. Could anyone, please, point me to such an example?
So far I thought that there is possible to have only one operation exposed with a BPEL process, what is delimited between the receive/reply blocks (in the synchronous case).
Regards,
Marinel

Web.ProcessBatchData performance issue - optimised way to insert 20000 records.

Hi all,
I am trying following code for inserting the 20000 items into sharepoint list.
I have used the "Thread.Sleep(999999999)" for complete the processbatch inserting the items.
But after some time I am getting error: "Thread was being aborted"
I want to optimize the performance OR Is there any other way to use the thread with process batch.
Can anyone please help me out here how to do ?
Code:
string BatchToInsertPRProducts = string.Empty;
BatchToInsertPRProducts = BuildBatch(row, spPRProductList.ID);
string BatchPRProductReturn = web.ProcessBatchData(BatchToInsertPRProducts);
Thread.Sleep(999999999);
Thanks,
Harish Patil

Hi Harish Patil:
In a basic text editor such as Notepad, open the web.config file for example %SYSTEMDRIVE%\Inetpub\wwwroot -or- %SYSTEMDRIVE%\\Inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\80 folder
ress CTRL + F to open the Find dialog box.
Find the following tag:
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="51200" />
Replace it with this tag:
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="6000" maxRequestLength="51200" />

Web Reporting Performance issue

Hello All,
We have some webreports, which contains "Dropdown Boxes" for filters. When I execute the report it is taking very long time, and i realized it is due to filling the filter(characterstic) values with dropdown boxes... Query execution time is more..
To solve this problem, I have removed all the "Dropdown boxes" for filters, and used "Navigation Block" with all the filters. After that the performance of the Webreport(initial screen) is improved by more than 50%.
Now the issue is, when I click on one of the filters of the navigation block, to open filter values window, it is again taking long time.
Is there anyway to improve the response time to open the filter values window of the Navigation block filter?
Is my approach to improve the performance of a webreport is suggestable or is there any other way?
Please suggest me.
Thanks
ravi

Hi Ravi,
try to use <param name="BOOKED_VALUES" value="Q"> in your Dropdown Box properties.
If you use more than one DDB in your webtemplate, you can send the request to the
server until all dropdown boxes with a sumbit button.
Here is the code example for this solution:
<form name="form_1" method="post" action="<SAP_BW_URL DATA_PROVIDER='DATAPROVIDER_1'
FILTER_IOBJNM_1=MYOBJ_1 FILTER_IOBJNM_2='MYOBJ_2'>">
<select name="FILTER_VALUE_1" size="1">
<object>
<param name="OWNER" value="SAP_BW">
<param name="CMD" value="GET_ITEM">
<param name="NAME" value="DROPDOWNBOX_1">
<param name="ITEM_CLASS" value="CL_RSR_WWW_ITEM_FILTER_DDOWN">
<param name="DATA_PROVIDER" value="DATAPROVIDER_1">
<param name="GENERATE_CAPTION" value="">
<param name="IOBJNM" value="MYOBJ_1">
<param name="ONLY_VALUES" value="X">
<param name="BOOKED_VALUES" value="Q">
ITEM: DROPDOWNBOX_1
</object>
</select>
<select name="FILTER_VALUE_2" size="1">
<object>
<param name="OWNER" value="SAP_BW">
<param name="CMD" value="GET_ITEM">
<param name="NAME" value="DROPDOWNBOX_2">
<param name="ITEM_CLASS" value="CL_RSR_WWW_ITEM_FILTER_DDOWN">
<param name="DATA_PROVIDER" value="DATAPROVIDER_1">
<param name="GENERATE_CAPTION" value="">
<param name="IOBJNM" value="MYOBJ_2">
<param name="ONLY_VALUES" value="X">
<param name="BOOKED_VALUES" value="Q">
ITEM: DROPDOWNBOX_2
</object>
</select>
<input type="submit" value="Submit ">
</form>
rgds Jens

1 core VS multi core in a web application: performance issue

Hi,
I'm having trouble with a web application in a multi cpu server (w2ksp4, iis+wl9.2)
I have prepared a set of JMeter stress tests, and the application is only capable to finish 5 transactions in a multi cpu (2 cpus with 2 cores each) but if I bind the JVM of the weblogic process to only 1 core, then the application can handle more than 60 transactions without errors.
I'm in production side; developers tell me "hardware problem" but it seems more likely a poorly designed application (as per my previous experience with them)
The syntoms are lot of null pointers exceptions and threads stuck when in multi core scenario.
Althought I have not put lot of details, any of you have ever seen something similar?
If anybody needs further information please feel free to ask
Thanks,
Antonio

What operating system are you using?
make sure you are trying a certificated configuration JDK and OS.
Oracle Fusion Middleware Supported System Configurations
If using unix/Linux OS based you migh be hitting low entropy issue, you can add
-Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom to JAVA_OPTIONS and retest the issue
Best Regards
Luz

Web Application Performance Issue (WLS 12)

Hello guys,
I am new to weblogic and i recently downloaded weblogic server 12.1.3.0 and i created a domain and successfully deployed my web application.
My web app is Java Based (Mainly Servlets , DWR Requests ..), the problem is that it takes for ever to start and it is very slow .
I deployed it on Tomcat 7 previously and had no problem it was very quick.
I tried changing the JVM Arguments (xms , xmx and XX:MaxPermSize) but no luck with that .
Kindly can anyone help me with this issue .
Thanks in Advance.

What operating system are you using?
make sure you are trying a certificated configuration JDK and OS.
Oracle Fusion Middleware Supported System Configurations
If using unix/Linux OS based you migh be hitting low entropy issue, you can add
-Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom to JAVA_OPTIONS and retest the issue
Best Regards
Luz

Performance issue and data getting interchanged in BO Webi report + SAP BW

Hi,
We are using SAP BW queries as the source for creating some BO reports.
Environments :
SAP - SAP BI 7.1
BO - BO XI 3.1
Issues :
The reports were working fine in Dev and Q with less data. But when we point the universes to BW prod ( where we have much data), the reports are taking quite a long time to refresh and getting timed out. This query has some key figures which are having customer exits defined to show only one month data. And also BW accelerators are updated for the infocubes pertaining to this query. The BO report is giving data if we apply a filter in 'Query Panel' of Webi to show only current month dates. But then the issue is the values are getting interchanged for many objects. For ex: there are 2 objects- ABS version and Market region. The values are getting interchanged in the BO level.
Please let us know if anything needs to be done in BO or BW to fix this issue if anyone has faced the same
Also Please let us know if customer exits and accelerators works fine with BO
Thanks
Sivakami

Hi,
Thanks Roberto. We'll check the notes
@Ingo,
We are able to solve the performance issue by removing unused Key figures and dimensions from the query, but the column value interchange issue still persisits
The build version is - 12.3.0
Query Stripping
Where should we enable query stripping? When i went through some documentation it was written that it'll be enabled automatically from XI 3.1 Sp3. Can you please let us know if its so and what we need to do to enable it.
The coulmn interchange is happening when we use dimensions in a certain order. When product type is used along with Market region. Market region shows values of Product type also in Webi report.
Thanks & Regards,
Sivakami

Webi Performance Issues on XI 4.0

Hello,
We're running XI 4.0 on a VM (Windows 2008 R2) and have serious performance issues opening Webi reports. The java Query Panel takes 30-40 seconds to open. Reports take 15 seconds to open. The same reports displayed no issues whatsoever on XI 3.1 SP 3 FP 3.5.
Could any of the following be the cause?
1. Running it on a VM (VMWare 4.5)
2. Using NAS for FRS?
Also, would it help at all if we were to install the CMS db on the BO server itself ? tnsping to Oracle for the CMS db returns in 0ms right now.
The environment we use is:
Dual Quad-core running at AMD Opetron 2.3Ghz with 32 GB of RAM on 3 servers.
Server 1: BOE full stack
Server 2: BOE full stack
Server 3: Explorer
BO XI 4.0 (build 565)
Windows 2008 R2 on VM
Oracle 11G 64 bit.
Tomcat 6
Java 1.6.29
I'd appreciate any help at all.
Thank you,
Srinivas

Hi Dennis,
Thanks for sharing the document it was really helpfull in understanding the new concepts.
Tried tracing network did not find any latency. As we have whole application deployed on tomcat can we deploy the static content to apache or else should we redeploy to tomcat again. My other question is if we deployed in split mode will there be any performance improvement in webi applet load time, is there a way to load java from local machine. In our environment webi applet load time is taking more than two mins. we want to reduce the load time. Upon a friends suggestion we started experimenting on diffrent browsers and found that IE9 was giving approximately the same performance as 3.1, on report opening, the java load is still slow. So is there a way to improve applet load times.
Thanks
Reddy
Edited by: reddygk on Feb 28, 2012 3:25 PM

Performance issue at Webi/Universe

Hi BO Experts,
I am new to Business objects.
I have developed a new universe and webi reports, but I am facing some performance issues at webi side. Below I am furnishing my development details; please let me know how I can overcome with the performance issues.
1. Created a Query on Multiprovider (query is having nearly 125 objects (Info objects (restricted with hierarchies), navigational attributes & restricted key figures).
2. Developed a new universe on the query.
3. As part of performance- restricted the some fields at query filters and also applied conditions at universe level.
4. Created a webi report and it is generating the results for 8 fields (4 characteristics (hierarchy levels) + 4 restricted key figures) and also I used 5 conditions at webi report filters.
Finally, my Webi results are matching with BW query results, but Webi report is taking more time ( approximately 15 min. ) when I compare with BW query results( approximately 1min. ) and MDX query(approximately 2 min.) results. Requesting t you to please let me know, if I need to do any changes at universe or webi or bw query level to overcome with this performance issue.
Awaiting for your response.
Regards,
PRK

Hi,
Here are few steps to improve the performance:
Try to build the aggrregrates at Cube leve for those Characterstics which u are using frequenlty in WEBI Reports.
As you are using Hierarchy, the report performance will be always not good.
I suggest this can be best handled in BI Modelling Level only instead of handling the same at WEBI Report Level as at WEBI Reports we dont have much options to improve the performance
Also, I suggest you to look into the Query performance at BEX Level and then use the Query for further connections
Regards
Sindhu

Performance issue in Webi rep when using custom object from SAP BW univ

Hi All,
I had to design a report that runs for the previous day and hence we had created a custom object which ranks the dates and then a pre-defined filter which picks the date with highest rank.
the definition for the rank variable(in universe) is as follows:
<expression>Rank([0CALDAY].Currentmember, Order([0CALDAY].Currentmember.Level.Members ,Rank([0CALDAY].Currentmember,[0CALDAY].Currentmember.Level.Members), BDESC))</expression>
Now to the issue I am currently facing,
The report works fine when we ran it on a test environment ie :with small amount of data.
Our production environment has millions of rows of data and when I run the report with filter it just hangs.I think this is because it tries to rank all the dates(to find the max date) and thus resulting in a huge performance issue.
Can someone suggest how this performance issue can be overcome?
I work on BO XI3.1 with SAP BW.
Thanks and Regards,
Smitha.

Hi,
Using a variable on the BW side is not feasible since we want to use the same BW query for a few other reports as well.
Could you please explain what you mean by 'use LAG function'.How can it be used in this scenario?
Thanks and Regards,
Smitha Mohan.

Performance issue webi report-BOXI3.1

Hi,
We have a requirement for a report where we will give user a set of objects (26 u2013 31) to do analysis using interactive viewing feature. Here we are facing severe performance issues and memory issues as the data that we are calling is huge( around 6 million records). At the report level we will be summarizing the data.
No of rows in the report is depending on the no of objects.
Mode of view : Interactive view.
Note:
1. Objects which are using in conditional level those have indexes.
2. No of report level variable are two.
3. Version of Business objects: BOXI3.1
4. OS: Sun Solaris
Please let me know if there are any means by which the memory requirements for the report can be minimized/ performance of the report can be improved.
Thanks,
Subash

Subash,
At the report level we will be summarizing the data ... any means by which the memory requirements for the report can be minimized/ performance of the report can be improved
Is there any way that you can summarize this on the database side versus the report level? The database should be sized with memory and disk space properly to handle these types of summarizations versus expecting the application to perform it.
Thanks,
John

ATA190: Web GUI page options are greyed out

ATA190: Web GUI page options are greyed out and device failed registration to CM 10.5
do anyone have a resolution o this issue?

Options Greyed out issue can be due to the below Bug, which is listed as just cosmetic:
ATA190: Web GUI page options are greyed out
CSCur53864
Description
Symptom:
ATA190: Web GUI page options are greyed out.
Most of the options in the Web GUI of the ATA 190 are greyed out and cannot be configured. There is no option in CUCM configuration page or the ATA190 Web GUI to unlock the configuration options.
Here is a list of a few of the pages that are greyed out and do not allow any editing:
Network Setup > Basic Setup > Internet Settings
Network Setup > Basic Setup > Time Settings
Network Setup > Advanced Settings > VLAN
Network Setup > Advanced Settings > CDP & LLDP
Administration> Log > Log Module
Administration> Log > Log Setting
Administration> Log > Log Viewer
Conditions:
ATA 190 Devices running firmware version running 1.1.0 (006)
Workaround:
These options are not configurable and are supposed to be view only. The issue is cosmetic.
Most of the Configurable settings are available under the Voice Menu and Administrative Menu.
-Terry
Please rate all helpful posts

Tidal 6.1 Web GUI performance issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for