TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS against /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107

Dear Experts,
I am testing the Charm configuration for 2 system landscape, both are real but test (if ok then it will be implemented on LIVE).
Everything is OK at SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN > System Landscape > Change Requests > Check except i am getting this error @ Check Logical Components:
System cancel RFC destination SM_SOLCLNT000_READ, Call TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS:
Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107
SOL is the SID for solman. I have tested RFC connections using SMSY > Systems > System Name > Server > Clients > Selected Client  > Check RFC Destination > everything is OK but with waarnings : [recommended but not essential] Expected system ID (ECC) does not match actual system ID (TSR)
RFC Connections maintained & Tested at DEV Client 000 and 600(customizing) && PRD Client 000 and 600(Production) with SOLMAN Client 000 and 100(Charm Client).
What could be the issue? Please help in this regard.
Thanks in Advance.

I reconfigured the CHARM with 3 system landscape now.
2 real systems, 1=DEV, 2.a=QA, 2.b=PRD, meaning DEV is on different instance but QA & PRD are on same instance with different clients.
Still im stuck here:
System cancel RFC destination SM_SOLCLNT000_READ, Call TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS:
Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107
and another error:
No track for project CH4RM with log. system TRN/600
Message no. /TMWFLOW/CM_CHECK038
Help will be appreciated,
Regards.
Zaman.

Similar Messages

  • System cancel RFC destination - /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107

    Hello Experts,
    In ChaRM, when i release transport request from DEV to QAS occurs the error below:
    "System cancel RFC destination SM_D01CLNT210_TMW, Call The name or password ins't correct.
    Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107"
    I've checked in the SM59 all connections to DEV and to QAS environment and all are OK.
    What's wrong with my ChaRM? Is possible to be a autorization problem?
    Thanks to all,
    FS.

    Hello Fabio
    'SM_D01CLNT210_TMW'
    check both, the connection test and the authorization test for the RFCs

  • The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created.

    Hi!
    I am trying to test a CHaRM for  3 real systems.
    I have followed every step of the guide.
    When clicking "create task list " at SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN, I get above message therefore the attempt to  created
    the maintenance cycle fails.
    If I do a check at solar_project_admin, there is ONLY one error: "No CTS projects found for project Z3SYSTEMS"
    I go txn slg1 and run against /TMWFLOW/CMSCV,  there is also ONLY one error: "No CTS projects found for project Z3SYSTEMS".
    What could be wrong here? How to debug?
    By the way,  if I use 3 clients in the same instance for CHARM, no problem at all to "create task list".
    Thanks for your help.

    To solve this issue, try to complete the maintenance cycle by switching the project phase to "in completion" and close the
    tasklist by closing the IMG and CTS projects, and create a new project, assign a new maintenance cycle.

  • ChaRM: Project Mandatory

    Hi Team,
    I am configuring ChaRM in Sol MAn (SP24, EHP1). When trying to set the project as "Mandatory" in t.code /tmwflow/cmsconf, i am getting below error. So i could not able to set the project as mandatory.
    System cancel RFC destination SM_RDDCLNT000_TRUSTED, Call TMW_CHANGE_PROJECT_SETTING: Screen output without connection to user.
    Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107
    Need your guidance to solve this issue.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    hi
    its clearly saying it not able to proceed the trusted RFC connection,
    can you please check those trusted connection and check al the authoirsation (like s_rfcacl)
    please read this before [Error while makingProject assignment Mandatory|Error while makingProject assignment Mandatory]
    Jansi

  • SolMan_system-TMW_VERSION_TEST

    In the SolMan system, I am facing the follwing error:
    Due to this error, data is not collecting in the SolMan system.
    System cancel RFC destination , Call TMW_VERSION_TEST: connection closed
    Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N107
    Best Regards,
    Eswar

    Hi,
    Check note 1001455. This note number is given in note 804198 under correction instructions.
    Rgds,
    Suman

  • TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS not found in satellite system running 4.6C kernel

    Hello.
    I am trying to set up Change Request Management. However I am getting an error in /TMWFLOW/CHARMCHK, which is "System cancel RFC destination SM_DD1CLNT000_READ, Call TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS: Function module "TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS" not foun".
    I have checked and that function module does not exist on the satelite system.
    The satelite system is running 4.6C kernel and its Basis SP level is 52.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Reenal

    Hello Reenal,
    It is a pre-requisite for using Change Management that your domain
    controller for 46C Satellite systems is a system equal to or greater than
    610 release.
    Only a domain link will not help in case of 46C systems. The domain
    controller has to be a system 610 or above.
    Best regards,
    Dolores

  • Error in creation of purchase materials/Goods receipt against PO(FI-MM)

    Hi All,
    While processing FI - MM integration iam facing below errors,request to guide me with same
    1) While creation of purchase materials
    Valuation class 7920 not allowed for material type Raw material Message no. M3180
    Diagnosis
    The combination of values you have entered is not defined in the system.
    Procedure
    Check your entries, and choose a valid value or combination of values with F4.
    I have crossed checked in t code OMSK valuation class 7920 exists.
    2) Goods receipt against PO:
    Number range for trans./event type WE in year 2014 does not exist Message no. M7562
    Diagnosis
    The number range for document number assignment has not been maintained in the year 2014 for the transaction/event type WE.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    in second case i have maintained number ranges in OBA7,OMBT,still iam facing with the same issue
    Regards
    Santosh

    Hi Dev,
    Thanks for your reply...yea i have done the ground work before posting this query
    but bitt confused with the post i have come across..
    Problem was occurring due to the wrong updating of raw material instead of finished goods in  MM01 (CREATION OF PURCHASE MM)
    however i have over come my 2nd issue,hopefull will over come my 1st issue also
    Thanks a lot
    Santosh 

  • Payment by letter of Credit against Purchase order

    When we are purchasing from Foreign Vendors , we need to open a Letter
    of credit (LC) .
    Depending on the terms of Purchase order , Vendor will discount it /get
    payment from Bank on submitting LC and other necessary documents.
    Vendor's Bank, at appropriate Time will send the same to Customer's Bank
    How to mapped this scenario in SAP-MM and FI .
    Activities required to be updated against Purchase order :
    (1) Payment Terms : 100 % against LC on delivery
    (2) History should reflect LC opened - Date and Bank Name which
    Vendor has suggested, our company's Bank Name
    (3) LC discounted details
    (4) LC payment due date to our company Bank - as Procurement needs
    to inform to Finance for this.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Best Regards,

    When we are purchasing from Foreign Vendors , we need to open a Letter
    of credit (LC) .
    Depending on the terms of Purchase order , Vendor will discount it /get
    payment from Bank on submitting LC and other necessary documents.
    Vendor's Bank, at appropriate Time will send the same to Customer's Bank
    How to mapped this scenario in SAP-MM and FI .
    Activities required to be updated against Purchase order :
    (1) Payment Terms : 100 % against LC on delivery
    (2) History should reflect LC opened - Date and Bank Name which
    Vendor has suggested, our company's Bank Name
    (3) LC discounted details
    (4) LC payment due date to our company Bank - as Procurement needs
    to inform to Finance for this.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Best Regards,

  • Possible to clear vendor open item against already posted payment document?

    Hi
    Can you advise if it is possible to clear an open item against already posted payment/clearing doc? Here is the background to the scenario:
    An invoice was posted with transaction FB60. This was subsequently picked up in the payment run F110 and cleared by payment document number 200005678. The item went to the bank on the paymnet file and was paid out to the vendor. The transaction reference, which appeared on the incoming bank statemnet was the payment document number 200005678.
    Subsequently it was discovered that the original invoice should have been posted with reference to a PO using MIRO. The requirement now is to reverse the paymnet documnet 200005678 in SAP, then reverse the document that was posted using FB60. After this the invoice will be posted using MIRO. This will create an open item on the vendor account.
    This item will not be piad out again. Therefore the requirement is to try clear that open item against the previously posted payment document 200005678.
    Is there any way to clear this vendor open item against the originally posted payment document 200005678?? Or any other advice on how this scenario can be handled in SAP?
    Thank for your help.
    Mike

    Hi,
    I tried that option in our test system. I ran FBRA and entered Paymnet Documnet Number (+Clearing Doc Number), Company Code, Fiscal Year.
    Then chose menu option Clearing -> Reset Cleared Items.
    The system pops up a window asking for a reversal reason and reversal date.  I use 01 and posting date of today.
    The system now posts another cleared document. That document places the invoice as an open item on the vendor account. It does not place the Payment Document as an open item on the account.
    When I go to F-44 only the open vendor invoice is showing there. There is no open paymnet document.
    Is there perhaps some configuration setting that stops the placement of the paymnet document as an open item when reset?
    Thanks for your help again.

  • Is There any API in receivables payment will made against closed invoices ?

    Hi ALL,
    i have requirement as below.
    i am doing AR Invoice Data Migration for Instance 11.5.5 (as a Source Instance) to the new instance R12 (as a target instance).
    Both open and closed invoices will have to be migrated from 11.5.5 to R12 to provide the drill down facility for audit purpose.
    To meet the above requirement all the open and closed invoice will be picked up from 11.5.5 ; and imported into R12..
    Subsequently, full payment will be made in R12 against all closed invoices in 11.5.5 to close those invoices by using any APIs?
    can some one explain is there any API in receivables payment will made against closed invoices.
    Thanks,
    VSR.

    Hi,
    Can you be clear on your question: You want any API to make payment against closed invoices?
    To me, You are making things complex. We can achieve the Migration of Closed invoices using following two procedures:
    Procedure: 1
    Ask Functional Guy to create a Transaction Type 'Closed Invoices' with Open to Receivables Flag not checked. +(You can uncheck Post to GL flag also, if required depending on your migration strategy)+. Status at Transaction Type if taken as 'Closed' it will be appropriate.
    Invoices migrated using this Transaction Type shall not be shown as Outstanding but will be useful for Audit.
    Procedure: 2
    Consider the amount due Original of Closed Invoices and migrate them with the amount as Amount due remaining.
    While migrating populate Receipt Method,Payment Method and Instruments useful for Automatic Receipts.
    Once Create Automatic Receipts Program is run, it will close all these invoices. Note: We require dummy bank here which points to a Clearing account.
    Automatic Receipts program is also an API.
    In the above 2 ways, we are acheiving the Goal by using Functional knowledge rather than Technical. And I think following Functional way is better and less time consuming.
    Please discuss with your Functional consultant if required. You can succeed.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • How to use one query against multiple table and recieve one report?

    I have duplicate tables, (except for their names of course) with commodities prices. They have the same column headings, but the data is different of course. I have a query that gives me a certain piece of information I am looking for but now I need to run this query against every table. I will do this every day as well, to see if the buying criteria is met. There are alot of tables though (256). Is there a way to say run query in all tables and return the results in one place? Thanks for your help.

    hey
    a. the all 256 tables whuld be one big partitoned table
    b. you can use all_tables in order to write a select that will write the report for you:
    SQL> set head off
    SQL> select 'select * from (' from dual
      2  union all
      3  select 'select count(*) from ' || table_name || ' union all ' from a
      4  where table_name like 'DB%' AND ROWNUM <= 3
      5  union all
      6  select ')' from dual;
    select * from (
    select count(*) from DBMS_LOCK_ALLOCATED union all
    select count(*) from DBMS_ALERT_INFO union all
    select count(*) from DBMS_UPG_LOG$ union all
    remove the last 'union all', and tun the generated quary -
    SQL> set head on
    SQL> select * from (
      2  select count(*) from DBMS_LOCK_ALLOCATED union all
      3  select count(*) from DBMS_ALERT_INFO union all
      4  select count(*) from DBMS_UPG_LOG$
      5  );
      COUNT(*)
             0
             0
             0
    Amiel

  • Need BAPI for MIGO to create a Goods Receipt against PO &Outbound Delivery

    Hi Friends,
    GRN’s (Good receipt notifications) created in DHL (Non SAP system) will need to be communicated to SAP.
    I need to post goods receipt using input data in MIGO. Is there any BAPI that i can use.The requirement is like below:
    PO number field in output file is checked against entries in EKKO-EBELN, if a match is found the GR is posted against a Purchase Order otherwise LIKP-VBELN is checked and if a match is found GR is posted against an Outbound Delivery.
              If PO Number = EKKO-EBELN    GR against Purchase Order
                            = LIKP-VBELN      GR against Outbound Delivery
    Based on the above condition I need to create a Goods Receipt. 
    Could you please tell me the GM code, movement types and the required fields to be passed for the BAPI?
    The fields available are with us are...
    Header text. - Bill of Lading- Posting Date-Quantity- UOM--- Vendor Batch / Batch / Serial No --- PO Number or Delivery Number… SLED
    Are these fields sufficient for doing MIGO with the BAPI or do we require more fields???
    Please provide sample code if possible.
    Waiting for replies,
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sudha

    Hi Friends,
    GRN’s (Good receipt notifications) created in DHL (Non SAP system) will need to be communicated to SAP.
    I need to post goods receipt using input data in MIGO. Is there any BAPI that i can use.The requirement is like below:
    PO number field in output file is checked against entries in EKKO-EBELN, if a match is found the GR is posted against a Purchase Order otherwise LIKP-VBELN is checked and if a match is found GR is posted against an Outbound Delivery.
              If PO Number = EKKO-EBELN    GR against Purchase Order
                            = LIKP-VBELN      GR against Outbound Delivery
    Based on the above condition I need to create a Goods Receipt. 
    Could you please tell me the GM code, movement types and the required fields to be passed for the BAPI?
    The fields available are with us are...
    Header text. - Bill of Lading- Posting Date-Quantity- UOM--- Vendor Batch / Batch / Serial No --- PO Number or Delivery Number… SLED
    Are these fields sufficient for doing MIGO with the BAPI or do we require more fields???
    Please provide sample code if possible.
    Waiting for replies,
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sudha

  • Manual Creation of  PO against Against Sales Order AAC - M

    Dear Gurus ,
    I am facing issue that , as in MTO scenario some of the components in my BOM material  is not fixed and they can be known after some time like labels of finish goods , now i want to create Manual PO with reference to sale order AAC is M , but i found that when MRP is creating purchase requisition , G/L account in acc. ***. tab is  stock G/L , but when i am creating manual PO it is taking G/L from  GBB  Acct modification  VKA (account as in acc. assignment cat. is  M.)
    But I want it should take G/L from BSX  as it is taking  in case of MRP generated PR  against same sales order.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Akshay

    Dear Sir ,
    As here we are taking valuated stock against sale order , we are using account assignment category M and requirement class with valuation M and account assignment category M , as per bellow link.......
    Valuated Sales Order Stock Configuration - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
    now i am facing problem , when MRP is creating purchase requisition , G/L account in acc. assignmrnt. tab is  stock G/L from BSX which is right , but when i am creating manual PO with respect to same sales order , it is taking G/L from  GBB  Acct modification  VKA (account as in acc. assignment cat. is  M.)
    But I want it should take G/L from BSX because stock is valuated stock.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Akshay

  • Block the goods receipt against a purchase order without a record condition

    Dear
    I need to block migo against a po if FRB1 record condition price have price value 0
    I need to block only MIGO not the creation of the purchase order.
    How can I do this ?
    Thanks.

    hi,
    Yeah its placed at the item level of the PO, which states wheather GR is possible for it or not...if we uncheck it GR will not be posted...Check Delivery tab in the PO item details...
    But in your case you have to go on with condition type...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P
    Edited by: Priyanka Paltanwale on Oct 18, 2010 5:10 PM

  • MIGO - Goods Receipt against Purchase order. PO rate dispaly.

    Is it possible to display purchase order line item rate in MIGO - Goods Receipt against purchase order - Quantity tab.
    In Quantity tab - System is showing Qty in Unit of Entry, Qty in SKU, Qty in Delivery Note, Quantity Ordered, alongwith these fields we also want display of Purchase order rate/each of that line item.
    Please guide.

    BTW you are getting PO number at MIGO and clicking over that you will get entire PO then why you want PO rate display here??

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to force a dialog box for a network share lot BTMM login

    Once OSX has remembered a network share with User and PW, I cannot find a way to force a dialog box to appear, that allow manual entry of a different User and PW.  This is the case whether for a LAN device or WAN device via Back to My Mac (BTMM.)  Th

  • Urgent Requirement: sd_invoice_release_to_account - how to use?

    I have a really urgent requirement.  I need to release my invoice using this function module.  What should be the value of the parameter WITH_POSTING?

  • E72 and WLAN (why does it not connect automaticall...

    Hello - I have an E72. In my connections settings, I have GPRS, my "work" WLAN and my "home" WLAN in my "Internet" destinations. They are in the following order: 1) Home WLAN 2) Work WLAN 3) Voadfone GPRS Internet is set as my "default". All the conn

  • Caledonia Arch Linux Wallpaper

    Hey guys, I made this quick Arch wall paper to match my KDE theme which is called Caledonia (created by Malcer, not me at http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/?content=142424). Let me know what you think and if you'd like to see any changes. Last edi

  • Email Forwarding Tool is missing

    I'm trying to avoid all the issues with the verizon.net email client by forwarding messages to another account.  But, the link to the email forwarding tool is broken.  Does anyone know how to get to it? I submitted an email to the Verizon web folks,