Tolerance error in miro
Dear Gurus,
What is the root cause for the error message in miro, "Price too low (below tolerance limit of 10.23 INR". How to rectify it.
Thanks & regards,
Kumar
Hi,
YOu will need to go to OMR6, to check about the tolerance limit you have set for the MIRO.
If your tolerance limit is less than 5 %, you will need to tell the user about this.
Hope this can help.
Thank you.
kah Fei
Similar Messages
-
Tolerance error..
Hi ,
Created Purchase order with account assignment V , having the total Qty 1 and Value of 624475
Vendor is send multiple invoice like below
Invoice No Amount
1 124175
2 138475
3 361825
Since PO qty is 1 , I need to proportnate the Qty according to Value i.e
Invoice No Amount Qty
1 124175 0.199
2 138475 0.223
3 361825 0.578
When i am doing MIRO for invoice number 3 ( last invoice) , system propose the Value of 360947 and Qty 0.578 , The proposed value is less than Vendor invoice value.. if i change the amount to vendor amt ( matching with PO Value ) , system is giving error message of Tolerance Key.
My Query is why system is throwing tolerance error since i am changing the value up to PO Value.
RegardsHello
The problem is not with the tolerance, it is with the calculation.
0.578X 624475 = 360946.55
So MIRO is doing what it's suppose to do.
Keep the amount the same and change the value
or undo the previous invoices and change the numbers to fit better.
And I have a suggestion for next time:
If it's not an inventory material change the way you make the PO so the value will be in the amount field and the price will be 1
that way when you get split invoices you make good receipt for the value that is invoiced and you have no problem in miro with impossible numbers .
Good luck -
Hi,
I am getting tax error in MIRO while posting transaction. "tax amount must not be greater than the tax base" msg FF747.
Invoice amount is 168.91(MIRO)
PO amount is 55.17
Tax amount is 113.74
This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
tax amount is greater than due to heavy import duty. User wants to post greater tax amount than actual PO amount, could you please suggest how can it be possible to post in SAP, i am trying to post but i am getting above error.
This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
Thanks,
Sam.Hi Sam,
I too have the same kind of scenario. The VAT value is more than the base amount. Please inform me the solution applied by you.
Thanks in advance,
Pravin. -
hi,
I am getting following error in MIRO transaction ....Can anybody please fix this ?
"In company code 3000, the number range 51 is missing for the year 2008"
Regards
VijayHI,
Please check the nuber ranges whether that has been selected as external for the Invoicing.
If external then please check whether the said no range starting from 51 is included in the external no assignment or no?
If not then yiu may have to add the same no range and then check.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Prasanna
Award pls if helpful. -
Error In MIRO GL account allows only output tax
Hello All,
We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as below.
FB60
There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
MIRO
Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
The systemshows an error that GL ***** allows only output tax.
TAX CODE settings in FTXP
The GL showing error is in tax code
GL settings
In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
QUERY
Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
please note in both the cases the entries are same
Vendor Cr
Expense / Stock Dr
VAT GL **** Cr
VAT GL-2 Dr
VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
Any Idea !!!
Thanks & Regards
Arun RHi,
The problem is resolved .
The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
The details are in note 373587
Thanks for the support
Regards
Arun -
CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST
Dear Friends
I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
Please guide me in this context.
Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
Regards
shaileshI have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
ERROR IS:
"Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
Any other solutions.
Thankz and regards
Shailesh -
Hi Experts,
We are facing a very strange problem with the message control 8I 478 as an error at MIRO with different behavior in different servers.
In dev the same scenario with same message control the message is not triggering and taxes also calculating but in PRD the message is coming error.
Scenario:
PO-Dealer scenario--qty 100
VL31N-100 qty
J1IEX_C with MRP indicator for 100 qty(Mat type raw material)
MIGO-90 qty
Then again with J1IEX_P part 2 posted for 90 qty.
doc status in tables J_1IGRXREF-posted,J_1IEXCDTL-in process,J_1IEXCHDR-in process.
Now at MIRO in Dev server taxes are getting calculated with proper tax code and part 2 posting not yet done error is not appearing(8I-478).
Same scenario in PRD at MIRO error part 2 posting not yet done is coming for 8I-478, message control are same in both the servers.
Kindly suggest.
RegardsIf the issue is not happening in DEV, then ask your MM / FI consultant to compare both DEV and PRD. I feel, some MM/FI related setting is missing and hence the issue.
You may also have a look at the following OSS notes
Note 1535398 - 8I478 error when invoice is posted for service PO in MIRO
Note 591587 - Message 8i478 appears even though Part II is posted
G. Lakshmipathi -
Hi Experts,
I m facing a strange error in MIRO.
I have created a PO in Co code A100 for vendor XYZ.
The goods are received against this PO.
But when the accounts payable accountant tried to book the invoice, he selected the PO, but the strange thing happened is Vendor ABC appeared.
When I have created this PO for Vendor XYZ and done MIGO for this then why some different vendor ABC is appearing in MIR7 for the same PO.
Why is this happening? pls giude me in which areas I need to look to reach to the root of this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
go4SHi Chandramohan, Mainpal
Thanks for valuable replies.
I have checked the Partner functions for both Vendors. Vendor ABC is not created as invoicing party for Vendor XYZ.
I have even checked the company code, MIR7 is done for the same Co code for which the PO is created.
Any more inputs will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
go4s -
Tolerance limit for MIRO document
Hi Gurus,
We have 3 below scenarios on Tolerance limit in MIRO document and need a guidance to setup in SAP.
1. If the amt is less than Tolerance limit -- The user should select a seperate GL account manually instead of system adjusting the variance amt automatically to PPV account.
2. If the amt is greater than Tolerance limit --- We should be able to add a line item in PO and enter a GL account manual or add an item in IR.
3. If there is a high difference then it should return to the Vendor.
The quick guidance will be appreciated.
Thanks,
SPhi,
u go to IMGpath - MM - inventory management and physical inventory - Goods receipts - Set Tolerance Limits, specify u copy to ur company code 0001 -B1, 0001 - B2, 0001 - VP,
IMGpath - MM - logistices invoice verfication - incoming invoice -Configure vendor specific tolerance enter new entries,
IMGpath - MM - logistices invoice verfication -invoice block - Set Tolerance Limits
copy u specific c.code 0001 - BD, 0001 - VP enter and save
after will go to check steps , get it output
regards
janu -
Hello Gurus-
We are receiving an error in MIRO 'Jurisdiction codes 1400000000 and 1800000000 have different cash discount base control'
In checking the forum, I found a similiar post and the solution to was to update OBCP but when I go to this transaction, there is nothing to update.
We are on ECC 6.0 and on Vertex.
Any insight will be greatly appreciated!Hi,
Check if your customizing is correctly set in transactions
OB70, OBY6, OY01.
Also review F1 online help of field 'Discount base amount is the net
value' and notes 514938, 300253 and 872130.
Additionally, review following comments:
<1> if the flag of Activate Plants Abroad is activated, then
'Discount Base Net' in transaction OY01 for the concerned company code
must be ticked, otherwise, system will use gross amount as cash discount
base.
<2>if the flag of Activate Plants Abroad is not activated, then system
will read settings in OB70, if 'Disc Base Nt' flag is set, then system
will use net amount as "ash discount base".
See also note 882132.
I hope I could be of assistance.
Regards,
Fernando Evangelista -
Hey experts... when the user is running miro .. he gets the error like cost element requires a co assignment(KI235)... we made a config for particular element in okb9 which is based on business area vise... but still its getting error in miro.. please help me solve the issue
hey dev thankss for the reply... i am posting three screenshots
-
Hi all,
I had created a PO that contains an item i.e. cement. The price per kg is 171. The PO was old and the price changed when the material was recieved. so we want to post susequent debit in MIRO. while posting the difference, system is giving error that "Price too high (tolerance limit of 0.00 PKR exceeded) ". please suggest that what we should do?. we have done the same things many time before.
regards,
AI.if u change the tolerance limits from 0 to any limit or do not check then the user willbe able to manipulate the price in the invoice generation thru miro which means in a normal scenario if a vendor is liable to get a sum of lets say rs.10/item,becoz of the generosity of ur user he can get rs.9 or rs.11/item.
regards,
indranil -
Hi ,
What tolerance key is to be used in case of my GR amount has very big difference with the amount in logistic invoice verification i.e. in MIRO so that system should always give me error message. And what is the way if i want to restrict this difference to 1 rs only.
Right now if i am suppose to pay vendor rs 1000 and if i am posting invoice with rs 1 only still system is posting this and rest of amount is going to round off account. how this account is determined.
Regards
VivekHi
Goto OMR6---> For your Company Code, Activate Tolerance Key.....BD and go into details---> There you can define upto what limit the diff. should go to small diff. account( Transaction Event Key: DIF)
For eg.) Your Invoice Amount is 1000 INR.
In Tolerance BD , you have given the upper limit value as 1 inr and you have checked the Check limt.....then the system will not allow you to post More than 1001 INR....
Reward if useful
Regards
S.Baskaran -
Error in MIRO for input tax calculation
HI Gurus,
We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
1. Purchase Order with (PO no. 4700000010)
1.1. Account assignment category.
1.2. Tax code.
2. Goods Receipt MIGO
3. Vendor Invoice booking MIRO
After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
1. PO created
Basic amount 100.00
+ Basic Excise (16%) 16.00 (non-deductible)
+ Ecess (02%) 00.32 (non-deductible)
+ Hcess (01%) 00.16 (non-deductible)
+ CST (03%) 03.49 (non-deductible)
119.97
2. MIGO Transaction
Asset / Expenses A/c -
Dr 119.97
To Prov. For Liability 119.97
3. MIRO Transaction
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr 119.97
To Vendor a/c. 103.97
To Asset / Expenses a/c 16.00
(16.00 Basic excise duty)
At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr 119.97
To Vendor a/c. 119.97
In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
Thanks in advanceHi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax Dr. 25.50
Vendor Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor Cr. 11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax Dr. 25.50
Vendor Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor Cr. 10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM -
Runtime error in MIRO while using User/Screen exit
Hello,
I have implemented an exit in ABAP for MIRO which when transported to Quality server through runtime error.
I have used EXIT (SMOD) : LFDCB001 which contains FM -> EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001 and include -> ZXM08U31. In this exit I have written my code to disable Inv. Party field. This field exist in Details Tab in Miro Transaction.
Location of the field: MIRO -> Details (tab) -> Inv. Party (Field)
Code written in include ZXM08U31 is:
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF screen-name = 'INVFO-LIFRE'.
screen-input = 0.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
This exit is assigned to a project in CMOD and I tested the same in Development system. It is working perfectly.
Now I transported the TR (Includes program ZXM08U31 and Customer enhancement projects ZMIRO). Now when I run MIRO in quality server it triggers the my logic and then through runtime error.
Runtime error says:
Short text
Dynpro does not exist
Error analysis
The system attempted to use dynpro 0400 in program "SAPLXM08".
This dynpro does not exist.
I agree that screen 400 does not exists in program for MIRO but it does not exists in development system as well. So if the runtime error is valid in QEC server then why not in DEV server. And when it can run successfully in DEV server why cant it run in QEC server.
Hope I have explained all the things in detail.
Please provide me the solution since user can bombard anytime for the MIRO dump everytime in QEC.
Regards,
Harjeet GroverHi Harjeet,
Reason of your Dump is that the enhancement "LFDCB001" which you used contains one Function module exit "EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001" and another one screen exit in calling screen "SAPLFDCB" number 0150.
So when you activate your project these above mentioned both components were activated.
So when you execute transaction SAP looks for called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 but as you havn't created and program go for DUMP.
Solution - Just Create called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 and activate.
Thanks,
Vijay
Maybe you are looking for
-
Error while running the OA Tutorial.
Hi , I downloaded the new OA J Developer 10.1.3.1 from metalink using the patch 5856648.. I also has access to Release 12 vision instance which i'm trying to run the tutorial againist.. I did setup the jdeveloper on my machine as per the manual and t
-
Hi I am a new user to Oracle and trying to save a deal into database but getting an error stating "the contents are not saved"? What are the possiblities of this error? Is this database problem or an application problem? PLs help. Cheers!
-
HT1430 how can you tell if your iphone is hacked
My phone is acting very strangly and the Diagnostic tools show errors that i have never seen before.
-
I have reset all the settings, and there is no change. Please help!
-
Home Role in Development server not appearing
Hi Experts, I found a role called "Home" in my production server and I would like to have the same role in development server as well. I assigned same roles to my user id which availabe in the production server to my user id in development server.