Tolerance error in miro

Dear Gurus,
What is the root cause for the error message in miro, "Price too low (below tolerance limit of 10.23 INR". How to rectify it.
Thanks & regards,
Kumar

Hi,
YOu will need to go to OMR6, to check about the tolerance limit you have set for the MIRO.
If your tolerance limit is less than 5 %, you will need to tell the user about this.
Hope this can help.
Thank you.
kah Fei

Similar Messages

  • Tolerance error..

    Hi ,
    Created Purchase order with account assignment V , having the total Qty 1 and Value of 624475
    Vendor is send multiple invoice like below
    Invoice No                    Amount
    1                              124175
    2                               138475
    3                              361825
    Since PO qty is 1 , I need to proportnate the Qty according to Value  i.e
    Invoice No                 Amount             Qty
    1                              124175                  0.199
    2                              138475                  0.223
    3                              361825                  0.578
    When i am doing MIRO for invoice number 3 ( last invoice) , system propose the Value  of 360947 and Qty 0.578 , The proposed value is less than Vendor invoice value.. if i change the amount to vendor amt ( matching with PO Value ) , system is giving error message of Tolerance Key.
    My Query is  why system is throwing tolerance error since i am changing the value up to PO Value.
    Regards

    Hello
    The problem is not with the tolerance, it is with the calculation.
    0.578X 624475  = 360946.55
    So MIRO is doing what it's suppose to do.
    Keep the amount the same and change the value
    or undo the previous invoices and change the numbers to fit better.
    And I have a suggestion for next time:
    If it's not an inventory material change the way you make the PO so the value will be in the amount field and the price will be 1
    that way when you get split invoices you make good receipt for the value that is invoiced and you have no problem in miro with impossible numbers .
    Good luck

  • Tax error in MIRO

    Hi,
    I am getting tax error in MIRO while posting transaction.  "tax amount must not be greater than the tax base" msg FF747.
    Invoice amount is 168.91(MIRO)
    PO amount is 55.17
    Tax amount is 113.74
    This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
    tax amount is greater than due to heavy import duty.  User wants to post greater tax amount than actual PO amount, could you please suggest how can it be possible to post in SAP, i am trying to post but i am getting above error.
    This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
    Thanks,
    Sam.

    Hi Sam,
    I too have the same kind of scenario. The VAT value is more than the base amount. Please inform me the solution applied by you.
    Thanks in advance,
    Pravin.

  • Error in MIRO transaction

    hi,
       I am getting following error in MIRO transaction ....Can anybody please fix this ?
    "In company code 3000, the number range 51 is missing for the year 2008"
    Regards
    Vijay

    HI,
    Please check the nuber ranges whether that has been selected as external for the Invoicing.
    If external then please check whether the said no range starting from 51 is included in the external no assignment or no?
    If not then yiu may have to add the same no range and then check.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Prasanna
    Award pls if helpful.

  • Error In MIRO GL  account allows only output tax

    Hello All,
    We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as  below.
    FB60
    There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
    MIRO
    Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
    The systemshows an error that GL  ***** allows only output tax.
    TAX CODE settings in FTXP
    The GL showing error is in tax code
    GL settings
    In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
    QUERY
    Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
    please note in both the cases the entries are same
    Vendor Cr
    Expense / Stock Dr
    VAT GL **** Cr
    VAT GL-2 Dr
    VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
    Any Idea !!!
    Thanks & Regards
    Arun R

    Hi,
    The problem is resolved .
    The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
    The details are in note  373587
    Thanks for the support
    Regards
    Arun

  • CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST

    Dear Friends
    I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
    well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
    ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
    ..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
    Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
    Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
    we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
    Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
    Please guide me in this context.
    Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
    So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
    Regards
    shailesh

    I have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
    i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
    ERROR IS:
    "Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
    If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
    Any other solutions.
    Thankz and regards
    Shailesh

  • Message 8I 478 error at MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    We are facing a very strange problem with the message control 8I 478 as an error at MIRO with different behavior in different servers.
    In dev the same scenario with same message control the message is not triggering and taxes also calculating but in PRD the message is coming error.
    Scenario:
    PO-Dealer scenario--qty 100
    VL31N-100 qty
    J1IEX_C with MRP indicator for 100 qty(Mat type raw material)
    MIGO-90 qty
    Then again with J1IEX_P part 2 posted for 90 qty.
    doc status in tables J_1IGRXREF-posted,J_1IEXCDTL-in process,J_1IEXCHDR-in process.
    Now at MIRO in Dev server taxes are getting calculated with proper tax code and part 2 posting not yet done error is not appearing(8I-478).
    Same scenario in PRD at MIRO error part 2 posting not yet done is coming for 8I-478, message control are same in both the servers.
    Kindly suggest.
    Regards

    If the issue is not happening in DEV, then ask your MM / FI consultant to compare both DEV and PRD.  I feel, some MM/FI related setting is missing and hence the issue.
    You may also have a look at the following OSS notes
    Note 1535398 - 8I478 error when invoice is posted for service PO in MIRO
    Note 591587 - Message 8i478 appears even though Part II is posted
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Strange error in MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    I m facing a strange error in MIRO.
    I have created a PO in Co code A100 for vendor XYZ.
    The goods are received against this PO.
    But when the accounts payable accountant tried to book the invoice, he selected the PO, but the strange thing happened is Vendor ABC appeared.
    When I have created this PO for Vendor XYZ and done MIGO for this then why some different vendor ABC is appearing in MIR7 for the same PO.
    Why is this happening? pls giude me in which areas I need to look to reach to the root of this problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    go4S

    Hi Chandramohan, Mainpal
    Thanks for valuable replies.
    I have checked the Partner functions for both Vendors. Vendor ABC is not created as invoicing party for Vendor XYZ.
    I have even checked the company code, MIR7 is done for the same Co code for which the PO is created.
    Any more inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    go4s

  • Tolerance limit for MIRO document

    Hi Gurus,
    We have 3 below scenarios on Tolerance limit in MIRO document and need a guidance to setup in SAP.
    1. If the amt is less than Tolerance limit -- The user should select a seperate GL account manually instead of system adjusting the variance amt automatically to PPV account.
    2. If the amt is greater than Tolerance limit --- We should be able to add a line item in PO and enter a GL account manual or add an item in IR.
    3. If there is a high difference then it should return to the Vendor.
    The quick guidance will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    SP

    hi,
        u go to IMGpath - MM - inventory management and physical inventory - Goods receipts - Set Tolerance Limits, specify u copy to ur company code 0001 -B1, 0001 - B2, 0001 - VP,
    IMGpath - MM - logistices invoice verfication - incoming invoice -Configure vendor specific tolerance enter new entries,
    IMGpath - MM - logistices invoice verfication -invoice block - Set Tolerance Limits
    copy u specific c.code 0001 - BD, 0001 - VP enter and save
    after will go to check steps , get it output
    regards
    janu

  • Error in MIRO:  FF744

    Hello Gurus-
    We are receiving an error in MIRO 'Jurisdiction codes 1400000000 and 1800000000 have different cash discount base control'
    In checking the forum, I found a similiar post and the solution to was to update OBCP but when I go to this transaction, there is nothing to update.
    We are on ECC 6.0 and on Vertex. 
    Any insight will be greatly appreciated!

    Hi,
    Check if your customizing is correctly set in transactions
    OB70, OBY6, OY01.
    Also review F1 online help of field 'Discount base amount is the net
    value' and notes 514938, 300253 and 872130.
    Additionally, review following comments:
    <1> if the flag of  Activate Plants Abroad is activated, then
    'Discount Base Net' in transaction OY01 for the concerned company code
    must be ticked, otherwise, system will use gross amount as cash discount
    base.
    <2>if the flag of  Activate Plants Abroad is not activated, then system
    will read settings in OB70, if 'Disc Base Nt' flag is set, then system
    will use net amount as "ash discount base".
    See also note 882132.
    I hope I could be of assistance.
    Regards,
    Fernando Evangelista

  • Cost center error in miro

    Hey experts... when the user is running miro .. he gets the error like cost element requires a co assignment(KI235)... we made a config for particular element in okb9 which is based on business area vise... but still its getting error in miro.. please help me solve the issue

    hey dev thankss for the reply... i am posting three screenshots

  • Error in MIRO - Urgent

    Hi all,
    I had created a PO that contains an item i.e. cement. The price per kg is 171. The PO was old and the price changed when the material was recieved. so we want to post susequent debit in MIRO. while posting the difference, system is giving error that "Price too high (tolerance limit of 0.00 PKR exceeded) ". please suggest that  what we should do?. we have done the same things many time before.
    regards,
    AI.

    if u change the tolerance limits from 0 to any limit or do not check then the user willbe able to manipulate the price in the invoice generation thru miro which means in a normal scenario if a vendor is liable to get a sum of lets say rs.10/item,becoz of the generosity of ur user he can get rs.9 or rs.11/item.
    regards,
    indranil

  • Tolerance Key in MIRO

    Hi ,
    What tolerance key is to be used in case of my GR amount has very big difference with the amount in logistic invoice verification i.e. in MIRO so that system should always give me error message. And what is the way if i want to restrict this difference to 1 rs only.
    Right now if i am suppose to pay vendor rs 1000 and if i am posting invoice with rs 1 only still system is posting this and rest of amount is going to round off account. how this account is determined.
    Regards
    Vivek

    Hi
    Goto OMR6---> For your Company Code, Activate Tolerance Key.....BD and go into details---> There you can define upto what limit the diff. should go to small diff. account( Transaction Event Key: DIF)
    For eg.) Your Invoice Amount is 1000 INR.
    In Tolerance BD , you have given the upper limit value as  1 inr and you have checked the Check limt.....then the system will not allow you to post More than 1001 INR....
    Reward if useful
    Regards
    S.Baskaran

  • Error in MIRO for input tax calculation

    HI Gurus,
    We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
    1.     Purchase Order with  (PO no. 4700000010)
    1.1.     Account assignment category.
    1.2.     Tax code.
    2.     Goods Receipt – MIGO
    3.     Vendor Invoice booking – MIRO
    After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
    At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
    1. PO created
    Basic amount                   100.00
    + Basic Excise (16%)        16.00 (non-deductible)
    + Ecess             (02%)       00.32 (non-deductible)
    + Hcess             (01%)       00.16 (non-deductible)
    + CST                (03%)       03.49 (non-deductible)
                       119.97
    2. MIGO – Transaction
    Asset / Expenses A/c -
    Dr        119.97
      To Prov. For Liability                          119.97
    3. MIRO – Transaction
    Provision for Liability A/c -
    Dr   119.97
    To Vendor a/c.                                       103.97
    To Asset / Expenses a/c                           16.00
    (16.00 – Basic excise duty)
    At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
    Provision for Liability A/c -
    Dr   119.97
    To Vendor a/c.                                       119.97
    In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
    Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi All,
    Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
    Entry is generated
    GR/IR  Dr. 100
    Tax     Dr.    25.50
    Vendor          Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
    Vendor          Cr.   11.25 (10% split on total amount)
    Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
    GR/IR  Dr. 100
    Tax     Dr.    25.50
    Vendor          Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
    Vendor          Cr.   10 (10% split)
    Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
    How to do this in system?
    Thanks,
    Pushkar
    Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM

  • Runtime error in MIRO while using User/Screen exit

    Hello,
    I have implemented an exit in ABAP for MIRO which when transported to Quality server through runtime error.
    I have used EXIT (SMOD) : LFDCB001 which contains FM -> EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001 and include -> ZXM08U31. In this exit I have written my code to disable Inv. Party field. This field exist in Details Tab in Miro Transaction.
    Location of the field: MIRO -> Details (tab) -> Inv. Party (Field)
    Code written in include ZXM08U31 is:
    LOOP AT SCREEN.
      IF screen-name = 'INVFO-LIFRE'.
        screen-input = 0.
        MODIFY SCREEN.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    This exit is assigned to a project in CMOD and I tested the same in Development system. It is working perfectly.
    Now I transported the TR (Includes program ZXM08U31 and Customer enhancement projects ZMIRO). Now when I run MIRO in quality server it triggers the my logic and then through runtime error.
    Runtime error says:
    Short text
        Dynpro does not exist
    Error analysis
        The system attempted to use dynpro 0400 in program "SAPLXM08".
        This dynpro does not exist.
    I agree that screen 400 does not exists in program for MIRO but it does not exists in development system as well. So if the runtime error is valid in QEC server then why not in DEV server. And when it can run successfully in DEV server why cant it run in QEC server.
    Hope I have explained all the things in detail.
    Please provide me the solution since user can bombard anytime for the MIRO dump everytime in QEC.
    Regards,
    Harjeet Grover

    Hi Harjeet,
    Reason of your Dump is that the enhancement "LFDCB001" which you used contains one Function module exit "EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001" and another one screen exit in calling screen  "SAPLFDCB" number 0150.
    So when you activate your project these above mentioned both components were activated.
    So when you execute transaction SAP looks for called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 but as you havn't created and program go for DUMP.
    Solution - Just Create called screen  "SAPLXM08" No-0400 and activate.
    Thanks,
    Vijay

Maybe you are looking for