Total transfer of equity consolidated unit using organizational change

Hi,
We have a scenario where we are doing total transfer of an equity consolidated unit (100% owned) from one company(old parent) to another (new parent)
The new parent is one level above the old parent in the hierarchy.
We've used organizational change logic and have set the divestiture dates/flag in the sender consolidation group and accordingly first consolidation dates/flag/OC number in the receiver consolidation group.
The investment AFD is submitted with "total transfer" with OC number.
There are multiple scopes of reported data for equity method in our configuration.
Each scope(equity pickup) is inturn created by reclassifying several equity accounts to a single BCS only item(the scope item)
When we run COI, the system posts one total divestiture document at the old conso group (where old parent is situtated) and posts a first consolidation, total divestiture, total transfer documents  at the new conso group level (which is one level above the sender conso group)
The total divestiture document at upper level is reversing the divestiture document posted at old parent.
The first consolidation document jas only statistical items posted in it.
The real document to check is the "Totals transfer document" which actually reads the investment (at old parent and new parent) , the equity holdings adjustment data(the scope items) and adjusts the investment in subs at new parent with offset going to divestiture account but of double the value than the expected scope vlaue.
Issues faced:
Q1. Consolidation group change tasks (at PL02, 12, 22) are not posting any documents. Is there an issue? Since I am using these tasks for the first time and dont know if this is possible.
Q2. The total transfer document is reading the equity holdings data as double the expected value( for each of the scopes of equity method). What could be the possible reason? How to fix this?
Q3. I would appreciate if someone can clarify what kind of postings the system makes as part of divestiture/transfer in case of equity consolidated unit transfer.
Please help!
Thanks,
AJ

Thanks Dan.
Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
The same activity number is there  for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Total Transfer between paralel consolidation groups

    Hello Gurus!
    We are using SEM-BCS for legal consolidation of our consolidation hierarchy. The hierarchy stands as shown below in 04.2014:
    CG00
         CU000
          CG20
              CU005
              CU001
         CG01
              CG19
                   CU018
         CG02
         CG03
    In period 04.2014, we have to make a transfer of one consolidation unit (CU001) from consolidation group CG19 to CG20.
    In consolidation group CG19 in 03.2014, company CU001 is hold at 100% by consolidation unit CU018.
    In consolidation group CG20 in 04.2014, company CU001 is transferred to this consolidation group, as well as the participation (100% of the shares) from company CU018 to company CU005.
    The holding of the hierarchy is CU000 in CG00.
    To execute the transfer, we created organizational change company and organizational change number in the master data tab. Afterwards, company CU001 was changed from consolidation group CG19 to CG20. In the company CU001 we set the mark for first consolidation with organizational change and indicated the ID of the organizational change.
    After this definitions in the master data tab, we executed the task for consolidation group changes, obtaining the following result:
    Balance sheet items were correctly posted in group CG20, as this the destination group of the transfer. But on the other hand, the elimination from the previous consolidation group (CG19) is being wrongly executed, as the elimination is being executed in consolidation group CG00, when this should be posted in CG19.
    Could you help us understand what is being wrongly made, for the post being made in CG00 and not in CG19.
    Thanks in advanced.

    Thank you for your reply Dan.
    Responding to your questions:
    1) The operation wasn't made with indication of divestiture in period 004/2014. However I tried to test it with that indicator (divestiture with OC), and the results weren't diferent from the ones i'm obtain now.
    2) The consolidation group changes were executed.
    3) The whole balance sheet accounts. The consolidation group changes were executed at levels 02, 12 and 22.

  • Reparenting - of equity consolidated units upward in hierarchy

    Hi experts,
    We're doing reparenting of a cons unit (upward in a hierarchy) : The scenario is explained as under:
    There are two hierarchies in a single version. The consolidation units falling under both hierarchies are same. Difference being - H1 is a flat hierarchy with parent A and all other as subsidiaries (100% owned and purchase method consolidated)
    H2: Has multiple levels (conso groups) with overall parent A. All other companies are equity consolidated (ofcourse parents in each group is assigned purchase method, ownership is again 100% of all units)
    In H2: we're doing a reparenting. From a lower conso group(cons group CGB with parent B) a unit(unit C) is moving to the top conso group(cons group CGA with parent A). The master data changes in both conso groups have been made(period/yr of divestiture and period/yr of acquisition set in the sender group and receiver group respectively; added the cons unit C in CGA group).
    The organizational change logic is being used.
    After the conso group change task and COI task are run, in the report there is a difference in the equity PY surplus at level A - overall parent) in both hierarchies.
    There are two equity pickups - A/c1 and A/c2
    The opening balances on these accounts are getting reversed in the divestiture period in old parent.
    Whereas the PY - RE(Previous year - Retained earnings) account is not getting reversed (in itself) but the balance is being posted to COI:Clearing item (COI clearing item defined in COI settings->Appropriation of retained earnings -> Net income tab)
    1. The client doesnt want PY equity surplus to change. In H1 , it is not changing (not reversing) whereas, in H2 it is reversing in the same accounts - balancing to zero.
    2. They'd ideally want the PY surplus to goto the COI clearing.
    They'd like the system to do this entry and not fix this by doing a manual PL30 journal.
    Can you tell me if there is anything in the configuration of COI that can fix this issue?
    Why is the system behaving differently for A/c1 (and A/c2)and PY - RE account?
    Another thing, when I look at the COI documents posted in the H2 hierarchy, I see the A/c1 and A/c2 (scopes of data for equity method) as double the amount in the new cons group (equity holdings data) whereas in the H1 (where only a total transfer doc is posted) I see the accounts (as part of equity data) with the actual value.
    Thanks, AJ
    Edited by: A J on Nov 17, 2009 3:17 PM

    Thanks Dan.
    Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
    1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
    For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
    These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
    Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
    Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
    2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
    The same activity number is there  for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
    Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
    Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
    Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
    Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
    Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
    Thanks.

  • Display of total ansal for each org unit using the sdepth (depth level)

    Hi all,
         We have a requirment in which we will be getting all the active employees related to a perticular org unit then  For every PERNR,we need to  find (as of run date) the org ID on PA0001- ORGEH and total the dollars at the org unit ID level started at the org unit defined on field ORGID and only as far down as defined on selection screen field SDEPTH.
           Example: $10k under Dept D, $9k under Dept C, $8k under Dept B and $7k under Dept A. If field SDEPTH was set to blank, each department would be assigned the above stated budget amount. If SDEPTH was set to 3, the budget would stop at the third level down the org chain (assuming A is the org unit defined in field ORGID, org unit C would be the third org down the chain). The total budget at level C would incorporate any dollars calculated from employees that fall below this org unit in the structure. In this example, the total for org unit C would be $19k, B would remain at 8k and A at 7k.
        We are making use of the FM :  RH_STRUC_GET  to get all pernr numbers related to a perticular org unit and sub level units separately and also RP_ANSAL_FROM_WAGETYPES for getting ansal based on the wahge types (multiple wage types can be provided by the user on the selection screen) .
    Please let me know how can i achive the requirement.
    Regards,
    Zareena.
    Edited by: zareena molla on May 20, 2008 7:14 AM

    Thanks Dan.
    Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
    1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
    For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
    These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
    Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
    Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
    2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
    The same activity number is there  for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
    Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
    Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
    Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
    Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
    Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
    Thanks.

  • Total transfer

    Hi all,
    We are using SEM-BCS 6.0 and we have a question.
    We are having an inconsistency in the Totals Records after a total transfer in a downwards movement.
    At the consolidation area GA01, consolidation unit PL01 has 100% participation in PL23 and PL23 has 100% participation in PL24.
    Now we have done a downwards movement of PL24 from GA01 to GA08 where we have a total transfer of participation from PL23 to PL22.
    We also execute the task "Change to Consolidation Group" in order to clear financial statement itens of PL24 at GA01.
    The error we get is that in the consolidation of investments the elimination of the investment (posting level 30) is being posted to an incorrect partner company.
    The partner company should be equal to the investee unit (that should be PL24) but is being posted to a partner company (PL22 and PL23).
    In the Totals Records, the investee is correct (PL24) but the partner company is incorrect, is being posted as PL23 and PL22.
    Example:
    Investee unit - PL24
    Company - PT23
    item - 51000000 (equity item)
    partner company - PL22 (should be PL24)
    posting level - 30
    Can you please help me?
    Thanks for your help.
    Best regards.

    Because partner unit is not relevant for COI and only investee is relevant, partner unit is not changed with the total transfer. Only a manual entry will change the partner unit for posting level 30 records but it should not be necessary.

  • Total Transfer & Organizational Change (SEM-BCS)

    Dear colleagues!
    Got som challenge with processing a merger under consolidation of
    investments in SEM release 4.0.
    As I understand, the proper method to apply to mergers is a) a
    divestiture of the old consolidation unit and b) postings of account
    balances from old unit toward the new unit in the source system,
    with subsequent data load.
    Issue:
    In our case a subsidary of the old parent (merged)"follows" the
    merger
    towards another consolidation group (old parent divested, subsidary
    unchanged with new cons group assignment).
    Client expects the merger to be physically carried out in period 6,
    with a validity (back in time) starting with period 1, without
    processing period 1-5 in the monitor. Client also expects the income
    statement balances to be reversed from old cons group assignment and
    posted under new cons group for the accum. balance from period 1-6.
    Question:
    Would anybody know (could give us) a brief description on what to
    remember when setting the parameteres in preparation of the
    organization change (total transfer)!?
    Help is greatly appreciated.
    Frank

    Dan,
    What C/I activity are we supposed to use if we want transfer a unit vertically up in the hierarchy?
    And also,  we are still getting an error with Organization Change scenario when we run our COI. Can we please send you a detailed document of the issue we are facing to your email id?
    Thanks
    Ramesh

  • Balance carryforward consolidation unit with equity method

    Hi experts,
    One question in relation with balance carryforward in SEM BCS 4.0. Do Additional finantial data of Consolidation unit with equity method must be carried forward to following periods?
    I have a problem with AFD validation for equity method.
    Best regards,
    Beatriz B.

    Thanks Halim,
    I am not using consolidation unit combination. It is only Legal Consolidataion. However, I have fixed the problem by changing the master data of consolidation unit. I have enabled FCEP.
    I have one more question. Do I have to run Consolidation Group Change Task also when I am switching from Equity method to Purchase method for Associate companies?
    When I am changing from Equity to Purchase method all the previous C/I postings are reversed, but the profit of Associates which was already accounted by holding company in the previous period is transfered to Net Income-Method Change and second effect is given to Goodwill (GW is enhanced).
    Hence, post change of method, when I upload TB of Associate, the Net Income is not eliminated to the extent of the profit Adjusted on account of Method change.
    Please suggest,
    Thanks,
    USR

  • Managing organization unit using wlst or bpm webservice, is it possible?

    Anyone could help me with this doubt?
    Is possible add or del organization unit using wlst?
    Exist a Bpm Service for that?
    Thanks

    The BPM API exposes a IBPMOrganizationService that can be leveraged to maniuplate OU's - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/apirefs.1111/e25378/toc.htm. You could write some logic and deploy it as a WSDL.

  • My wife is using our daughters itouch.  My wife likes the old scrabble on the itouch and asked me to find out if she is allowed to somehow move or totally transfer the old scrabble from daughter's itouch to wife's iphone.  It was a free app,

    My wife is using our daughter's itouch.  My wife likes the old scrabble on the itouch and asked me to find out if she is allowed to somehow move or totally transfer the old scrabble from daughter's itouch to wife's iphone.  It was a free app,

    My wife is using our daughter's itouch.  My wife likes the old scrabble on the itouch and asked me to find out if she is allowed to somehow move or totally transfer the old scrabble from daughter's itouch to wife's iphone.  It was a free app,

  • Is there any way to subdivide Storage Unit using Transfer Orders

    Hi ,
    My client is asking about subdividing available storage units using Transfer Orders ( for their Prodn Process) ?
    I need your help in that regard
    Sandeep

    Hi,
    Please check this page of SAP help, maybe it can fulfill your requirement:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8471f4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Csaba

  • How to link ECC Company code with BCS Consolidation unit

    I have to create new consolidation unit in BCS, parallelly in SAP R/3 also I have created a company code.
    I could read following in the forum :-
    The Company Codes from ECC are assigned to the characteristic Company in BCS, thus creating a one to one relationship between ECC & BCS company codes.
    BUT HOW TO DO THE SAME.
    Also any advise on Profit centre and cost centre etc in BCS in line with ECC. This is first time I am configuring in BCS,

    Typically in ECC company codes are assigned to a company. The company is typically used for cons unit in BCS, but it is not uncommon for company code to be used as cons unit.
    When company code is used, it is an attribute of the characteristic company and thus in the load mapping, the company is mapped to the attribute company code. This results in company code being mapped to company.
    Otherwise, if company code is in the databasis as the cons unit role, then it is simply mapped to company code to company code.
    For profit center and cost center, these are typically assigned the role subassignment, but it is not uncommon for profit center to be a cons unit for a matrix consolidation. However, these characteristics must first be included in the totals/databasis infocube.

  • Merger of two Consolidation Unit

    Hi,
    I am working on a project where I need to Merge Two Consolidation Unit of the same Consolidation Group.
    For Example, Consolidation Group A1 & A2 is under Consolidation Group ABC. Now we need to Merge Cons. Unit A1 into Cons. Unit A2 under the same Cons. Group ABC. How to handle this in SEM - BCS?
    I cannot use Consolidation Group Changes as this is not transferring but it is merging of two Cons. Unit.
    Your input is highly apprecialbe.
    Regards,
    Viral Joshi

    Hi HI COLLET Thibaud ,
    Thanks for the reply and sorry for my late reply. I was gathering information that you asked from the client. Now picture is more clear.
    Ex.
    Consoildation Unit: A & Consoildation Unit: B. Both are under Consolidation Group AB
    Parent Unit : C
    Now Consoildation Unit: A is getting transferred to Consoildation Unit: B. Business wants to transfer Balance Sheet as on Date. There is no Goodwill. Everything is getting transferred at Book Value.
    Now for Share Capital purchase, there are two options suggested. One is to buy share of Consoildation Unit: A by Cash and second is to buy share of Consoildation Unit: A by issuing Shares of Consoildation Unit: B.
    If we go for option 1 of purchasing through Cash, then there will be impact only on Cash Outflow from Consoildation Unit: B and Share Capital Reduction from Consoildation Unit: A. This will happen becasue Consoildation Unit: B will pay Cash to Consoildation Unit: A and Consoildation Unit: A in turn will pay for Share Capital and reduce its Share Capital. But if we go for option 2 of issuing shares of Consoildation Unit: B, then there will be change in the Share Capital of Consoildation Unit: B and reduction in the Share Capital of Consoildation Unit: A. In any case, there will be reduction in Share Capital of Consoildation Unit: A.
    So what do you suggest in this scenario? What will be the BCS impact if we go for option1 or option2. Just to remind, we are transferring everything including Share Capital in FI. But I am wondering the steps and impact on BCS...
    Your input is highly appreciable and definately will be rewarded with points !!!
    Thanks..
    Best Regards,
    Viral Joshi

  • Dummy consolidation unit

    I have read that for every consolidation area it is needed to configure a dummy consolidation unit. But my question is: which data transfer method should I assing to it?
    Thanks in advance!
    Rushid

    Dan,
    In R/3 systems dummy PC very often presents. For data consistency during data load from R/3 to BCS it might be useful to have such PC in BCS also.
    Moreover, I met several times situation when data basis was constructed with a matrix for a future use. And in the current situation all PCs in a matrix were attributed to a dummy.

  • Transfer from one consolidation sub-group to another

    Hi,
    I wish to transfer a consolidation unit from one sub-group to another. To do this, I know that i need to divest the entity in one sub-group and post first consolidation in another group.
    For this, i change the divestiture period in the master of consolidation unit. What are the further steps for posting first acquisition? Should i change the organizational hierarchy (by dragging the consolidation unit from old sub-group to new??
    Specifically, the organization structure consists of the following Sub - Groups
    CG1
    CU - 1000 - Parent Unit
    CU - 1100
        CG2
        CU- 2200 - Parent Unit
        CU - 2300
        CU - 2400
                CG3
                CU - 3000 Parent Unit
                CU - 2100
    Currently CU 2100 is a 100% subsidiary of CU 3000. .For CG3, consolidation happens at 3000 level and then the results are passed on to CG2. In CG2, the parent unit is 2200 and then the results are passed on to CG1.
    In this month, CU-3000 sold it's investments in CU 2100 to CU 2400 (at a profit). There was no goodwill during acquisition of 2100 by 3000.....
    I wish to know how i can tackle this in BCS..
    Regards,
    Shreepati
    Edited by: Shreepati Shenoy on Mar 21, 2011 7:34 AM

    Thank you for your response!
    I read about this in the forum. But i am unable to understand how consolidation unit 2100 can be part of CG3 (with divestiture period) and CG2 (for new acquisition). I tried doing the following in our system -
    1) Enter a divestiture period (current period) for CU 2100 in CG3
    2) In AFD - I entered First Consolidation data for CU 2400 (which acquired CU 2100 at a profit)u2026
    3) When I execute Consolidation Group Changes u2013 Entries are posted only in CG3 (at PL02, 12, 22)..No impact can be seen in CG2..
    4) When I execute COI, I get an error which says that investment in 2100 exceeds 100% (i.e. it is 200%)
    I tried to drag and drop CU 2100 from CG3 to CG2. However this does not help either (as CU 2100 appears in CG2 only)
    Please help me understand if I am going wrong somewhere..

  • Concept of Integrated Consolidation Unit of SEM BCS

    HI Experts,
    I'm now in the SEM BCS 4.0 and BW 3.5 implementation. Previously I was the ECCS specialist and before the FI and AM specialist.
    Now I'm in SEM BCS implementation.
    I have one question in connection to the integrated consolidation unit. As the reference, I take the concept of this using the ECCS.
    As you might know, the creation of integrated consolidation unit for using realtime update method in ECCS, is pulled from FI company ID.
    Meanings if I set the configuration properly, I can pull out the company master data as the consolidation unit master data in consolidation monitor.
    Now, in SEM BCS, I want to do the same thing. I mean, off course I can create company ID in R/3 and then create the consolidation unit manually using UCWB. But this scenario can create inconsistency, and I also think this is not the right concept of doing integration between R/3 and SEM BCS.
    My question is : what is the concept of this master data integration, and what is the proper way to do it?
    Any advise on this question is highly appreciated.
    Thank you in advance.
    regards,
    Halim

    Hi Halim,
    You need to build properly your data basis in data model.
    Assign your company to a consolidation unit role:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sem350bw/helpdata/en/dd/f3783bcfef4a2de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    I sent to you the file concerning BCS that you asked for in another thread.
    Best regards,
    Eugene

Maybe you are looking for

  • My 13 hour old brand new iPod touch 5g 32gb won't turn on!

    I just got my iPod 13 hours ago and when I woke up and tried turning it on the screen just stayed blank

  • 6509 SYS-4-SUPERVISOR_ERR: How can I trace to a port ?

    Hi, I seeing these errors daily on one of my 6509's SYS-4-SUPERVISOR_ERR: Forwarding engine IP length error counter = 93 This is caused by a malformed packet from a bad nic or app etc being dropped by the supervisor. My question is how can I troubles

  • BPM - Async/Sync Bridge

    I'm trying to implement the scenario in this blog - http://www.riyaz.net/blog/a-step-by-step-guide-to-bpm-asynch-sync-bridge/technology/sap/170/ It involves a File  - RFC - File scenario using BPM . File Async Receive  -> Sync Send to RFC ->  Transfo

  • How to "select a Directory" from Browse button

    Hi all, I am new to Swing API. All I want is to create a TextField and a Browse button. User has to select a directory from Browse button and upon selection of the directory and clicking OK, the directory should be placed into TextField. Hope this is

  • Sync iPad with an internal network via WIFI and file exchange?

    Hi all, Our architects firm is currently trying to cut down on its paper waste. One sollution we are exploring is a system by which Ipad's can be synced with our internal file network (via wifi), we can download onto an Ipad PDF files which can be vi