Transaction FI13 is locked (in transaction SM01) - In Reality It's Not

This tcode (FI13) is showing locked when executed in PRD, SBX, or QAS while it is not locked in DEV config clients such as DEV 010, or 040. I have checked SM01 and report RSAUDITC or RSAUDITC_BCE, it did not show that tcode is locked. Can anybody shed some light how I can unlocked or make this tcode work in PRD.

Hi,
As per your query if you find in sm01 the t-code is not locked it means this is locked by any programe. I found this type case earlier also, some devloper was doing experiment to lock t-code through abap programe.
Pls cordinate with abaper if he can find the programe name.
Anil

Similar Messages

  • Transaction ME51 is locked (in transaction SM01)

    Help someone!
    i dont have a clue has to what is happening here?

    Dear Friend,
                     Type the Transaction in SM01 Below box, then u ger the SM01 in that u deactive that Indicator corresponding to that Transaction ..
    From sas..

  • Locking of Transactions for MM - FI Integration

    Every month, we do the closing of accounts. For this, we have to close all GRN related transactions, so that the accounting entries are not passed. We use trxn SM01, to lock, MIRO, MIGO, & ML81N, so that user does not book any entries for that month.
    Is there any other better way to achive this ?? if yes, can it be done by the user department , instead of coming to IT, to lock the transactions
    thanks
    amit

    Hello,
    There is fixed solution on for what you are asking.But its little bit tricky.
    If you are aware of Validation rule .you can go and customise your requirement or take ABAPERS help.
    Please use tcode GBB0 & Ob28 to create validation
    For e.g
    Prerequisite.
    If posting day is after last day of month & tcode is MIGO,MIRO,etc
    CHECK: User ids(only these user will have option to use this trx else it will give error.you can keep this access to only few like urself)
    Error: Posting not allowed in previous month.
    likewise you can custoimise your requirement.

  • ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock

    Hi,
    My name is Guneet and I'm working on an application running on BEA Weblogic Server 9.2 running on a Red Hat Linux box using Oracle 10g as the database. My problem is that recently our code started getting the following exception while updating a database table.
    java.sql.SQLException: [BEA][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock
    Application Details
    * Using Stateless Session EJB
    * Only one Business method in this EJB with transaction attribute set to "required"
    * This method executes two select queries & one update query
    * We are using JDBC to access the database.
    * We have configured a Data Source & are using it to get a database connection.
    * Weblogic's Oracle Driver is being used.
    More details
    * The application has been running well since a month.
    * Two days ago,the update query failed with the above error.
    * At that time, a single client was accessing the system.
    * Once this problem occurs, it starts appearing frequently.
    * Eventually a request to get a connection from the Data Source times out & the exception copied at the end is thrown
    * At this stage the application gets stuck and all requests trying to get a connection end up with this exception.
    * Fortunately, Restarting the Weblogic Server gets us out of this problem and transactions resume normally.
    Now my questions are
    # Why is this error happening & what does it mean?
    # It looks like the second exception (unable to get a connection from ds) is an after effect of the first problem (ORA-02049) once it appears for a couple of times. Can somebody validate this?
    # Though I don't understand JTA well but I don't think this application needs distributed transactions so, I'm thinking of modifying the driver type to non-XA oracle driver. Any advise/pointers/comments on this front is welcome !!!!!!!!
    Thanks
    Guneet Sahai
    Exception Trace
    Dec 27, 2006 4:47:50 PM | com.gisil.themis.db | SEVERE | Unable to load merchant DEL = 911168900164. Reason - java.sql.SQLException: Unexpected exception while enlisting XAConnection java.sql.SQLException: XA error: XAResource.XAER_RMERR start() failed on resource 'themis-ds': XAER_RMERR : A resource manager error has occured in the transaction branch
    javax.transaction.xa.XAException: Unexpected error during start for XAResource 'themis-ds': Transaction timed out after 29 seconds
    BEA1-252DE51AC930078CA638
    at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.XA.createException(XA.java:103)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.start(DataSource.java:753)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.start(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1182)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.xaStart(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1115)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.enlist(XAServerResourceInfo.java:274)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.enlistResource(ServerTransactionImpl.java:497)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.enlistResource(ServerTransactionImpl.java:429)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.enlist(DataSource.java:1408)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1332)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:440)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:396)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:359)
    at com.gisil.themis.db.impl1.DbManagerImpl.isPinValid(DbManagerImpl.java:872)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.ThemisBean.isPinValid(ThemisBean.java:185)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.isPinValid(Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.java:207)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:517)
    at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:224)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:407)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:403)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.access$300(BasicServerRef.java:56)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$BasicExecuteRequest.run(BasicServerRef.java:934)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.enlist(DataSource.java:1413)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1332)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:440)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:396)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:359)
    at com.gisil.themis.db.impl1.DbManagerImpl.isPinValid(DbManagerImpl.java:872)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.ThemisBean.isPinValid(ThemisBean.java:185)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.isPinValid(Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.java:207)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:517)
    at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:224)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:407)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:403)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.access$300(BasicServerRef.java:56)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$BasicExecuteRequest.run(BasicServerRef.java:934)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181)

    guneet sahai wrote:
    Hi,
    My name is Guneet and I'm working on an application running on BEA Weblogic Server 9.2 running on a Red Hat Linux box using Oracle 10g as the database. My problem is that recently our code started getting the following exception while updating a database table.
    java.sql.SQLException: [BEA][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock
    Application Details
    * Using Stateless Session EJB
    * Only one Business method in this EJB with transaction attribute set to "required"
    * This method executes two select queries & one update query
    * We are using JDBC to access the database.
    * We have configured a Data Source & are using it to get a database connection.
    * Weblogic's Oracle Driver is being used.
    More details
    * The application has been running well since a month.
    * Two days ago,the update query failed with the above error.
    * At that time, a single client was accessing the system.
    * Once this problem occurs, it starts appearing frequently.
    * Eventually a request to get a connection from the Data Source times out & the exception copied at the end is thrown
    * At this stage the application gets stuck and all requests trying to get a connection end up with this exception.
    * Fortunately, Restarting the Weblogic Server gets us out of this problem and transactions resume normally.
    Now my questions are
    # Why is this error happening & what does it mean?
    # It looks like the second exception (unable to get a connection from ds) is an after effect of the first problem (ORA-02049) once it appears for a couple of times. Can somebody validate this?
    # Though I don't understand JTA well but I don't think this application needs distributed transactions so, I'm thinking of modifying the driver type to non-XA oracle driver. Any advise/pointers/comments on this front is welcome !!!!!!!!
    Thanks
    Guneet SahaiHi Guneet. If you want to debug the JTA issue, I suggest opening an official
    support case. They will lead you through producing the JTA debug information.
    However, I believe you are correct that the transaction you describe is
    completely doable with a simple local transaction, so if you were to alter
    your pool to use the non-XA driver, it would probably be faster, simpler,
    and just work.
    Let me know...
    Joe
    >
    Exception Trace
    Dec 27, 2006 4:47:50 PM | com.gisil.themis.db | SEVERE | Unable to load merchant DEL = 911168900164. Reason - java.sql.SQLException: Unexpected exception while enlisting XAConnection java.sql.SQLException: XA error: XAResource.XAER_RMERR start() failed on resource 'themis-ds': XAER_RMERR : A resource manager error has occured in the transaction branch
    javax.transaction.xa.XAException: Unexpected error during start for XAResource 'themis-ds': Transaction timed out after 29 seconds
    BEA1-252DE51AC930078CA638
    at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.XA.createException(XA.java:103)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.start(DataSource.java:753)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.start(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1182)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.xaStart(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1115)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.enlist(XAServerResourceInfo.java:274)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.enlistResource(ServerTransactionImpl.java:497)
    at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.enlistResource(ServerTransactionImpl.java:429)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.enlist(DataSource.java:1408)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1332)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:440)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:396)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:359)
    at com.gisil.themis.db.impl1.DbManagerImpl.isPinValid(DbManagerImpl.java:872)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.ThemisBean.isPinValid(ThemisBean.java:185)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.isPinValid(Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.java:207)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:517)
    at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:224)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:407)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:403)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.access$300(BasicServerRef.java:56)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$BasicExecuteRequest.run(BasicServerRef.java:934)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.enlist(DataSource.java:1413)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1332)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:440)
    at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:396)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:359)
    at com.gisil.themis.db.impl1.DbManagerImpl.isPinValid(DbManagerImpl.java:872)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.ThemisBean.isPinValid(ThemisBean.java:185)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.isPinValid(Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl.java:207)
    at com.gisil.themis.ejb.Themis_aqqc4k_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:517)
    at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:224)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:407)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:403)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.access$300(BasicServerRef.java:56)
    at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$BasicExecuteRequest.run(BasicServerRef.java:934)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181)

  • How to lock a transaction code  in a report  ?

    Dear Abapers ,
         i had a requirement to lock a transaction code in my Module pool programming . the requirement goes in this way ..
    " if a  single user is editing a report then that particular report has to be accesseble to only that concerned user , it cant be accessed to any other user who gonna run the report unless the first user exits the report . <removed>.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sravani . Y .
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Apr 5, 2010 8:39 PM

    Hi,
    You have to verify the processes in execution. Here an exaple code:
      DATA: BEGIN OF WP_TABL OCCURS 10.
              INCLUDE STRUCTURE WPINFO.
      DATA: END OF WP_TABL.
      " This CALL verifyes the processes in execution:
      CALL 'ThWpInfo' ID 'OPCODE' FIELD OPCODE ID 'TAB' FIELD
        WP_TABL-SYS ID 'CPU' FIELD WITH_CPU.
        " Now loop at table WP_TABL
        LOOP AT WP_TABL.
           " Inside this loop you have to check if the report field WP_TABL-WP_REPORT is been executed more than one time. The user field WP_BNAME tells you who is executing the program.
        ENDLOOP.
    I suggest you, ask for an ABAPER help with this code example.
    Hope it helps you...
    Alexis Sánchez N.
    SAP ABAP Developer Consultant
    <please no company names in the posts, folks can view your business card if interested>
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Apr 12, 2010 4:50 PM

  • How to Lock a Transaction for Editing AND VERY minor tab cont. help

    Just two things I need to ask about
    <b>1. How to Lock a Transaction for Editing</b>
    I am currently using the fcode ENQUEUE_E_TABLE. The function works as once the transaction in opened, another cannot access it.
    However, I have two modes in my transction (Display and Edit). <u> What I need to do is If another user has already opened the transaction, the other user can still access the transaction but cannot access the edit mode.</u>
    <b> 2. VERY minor tab cont. help </b>
    I noticed in a table control is being used in a transction you can resize a colunm. <u> How do you disable this </b>?
    and <u> how do you resize the horizontal scroll bar </u> so that you can limit scrolling upto the point where there are field columns?
    Thanks for you help ppl and take care

    Hi chad,
    This link will help u know abty different types of locks that are available:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/7b/f9813712f7434be10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    For resizing all u can go to the table settings and u can do it.
    Hope tis helps u,
    Regards,
    Nagarajan.

  • OWB9.0.4-- ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock

    I'm running a simple mapping that copies all columns of data (using a filter on date for just current records) from one table in SQL Server into a staging table on my Oracle DW schema. It's using a dblink with transparent gateway for SQL Server, which works fine from SQL*plus.
    The map is in default mode (bulk-failoverto-row) with bulk size and commit frequency = 1000.
    The audit details show the first 1000 rows selected on the source, with an error on both the source and target tables:
    Target--
    ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock
    Source--
    ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence ORA-02063: preceding line from INTERGRATION@JXNSQL01
    (INTERGRATION@JXNSQL01 is the dblink name)
    Any ideas on how I can clear this up?
    Thanks,
    Paul

    Hi,
    After having upgraded to 9.0.4 (from 9.0.3) I'm running into exactly the same problems with some of my mappings. Actually I don't get any rows transferred from the mappings that fail.
    Out of 7 mappings, 3 worked just liked before while the 4 others just keep on running until I cancel them and I then see the BUSY/ORA-02049 in the Audit Browser.
    When comparing the mappings I see that the 3 that works all use some custom Procedures I have made.
    The 4 that doesn't work are all very simple - one of them just loads all the content from a table with two columns in my source to another table with two columns in my target! Two of the other mappings that doesn't work includes some simple CASE-expressions.
    Both my source and my target resides in a Oracle 9.2.0.3 database (not the same).
    Regards,
    Bent Madsen

  • Handling Locking for transaction in Middle Tier versus Database backend

    Hi,
    If we implement middle tier with C# as the programming language and backend as SQL Server database, if we now wanted to implement locking where we take the classic case of money withdrawal from a bank account, we could implement this as a single atomic transaction
    using locks / monitor in the middle tier or we could do this in a stored procedure and handle it using a begin tran commit tran in SQL Server.
    What would be the recommended way? middle tier or sql server database backend?
    Thanks

    > the two different servers having the same middle tier executing the same code at the same time will be handled by the backend by putting one on hold while the other is being serviced.
    Yes.  A SQL Server database provides a single coherent state repository for the whole application.  And you can use the database transactions to control which business transactions run concurrently, and which do not.
    David
    David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/

  • Lock between transaction branches of a global transaction

    Hi,
    I have an Oracle Database v.10.1.0.4, on which there are two schemas (A and B).
    A table on schema A has a reference key on a table on schema B.
    Now, i have a j2ee application that uses two distinct connection to performs inserts on both schemas within the same global transaction (using a JTATransactionManager), but i'm experiencing a lock in the following situation:
    1 - On connection for schema B, a new ROW is inserted
    2 - On connection for schema A, a new ROW is inserted referencing the new row in schema B, but the query is locked by the insert on schema B.
    It is like the two transacions are loosely coupled and not tightly coupled as I would expect for distributed transaction on the same oracle instance (or at least they are not part of a global transaction and are treated as two distinct transaction).
    Someone know if oracle jdbc drivers handle tightly coupled transactions for transaction branches on the same oracle instance that are part of the same global transaction?
    Thanks,
    Luca De Petrillo

    http://www.myoracleguide.com/s/managelocks.htm

  • Transaction errors: The lock operation ended unsuccessfully because of deadlock.

    Hi,
    One of our process is getting "Transaction errors: The lock operation ended unsuccessfully because of deadlock." error while processing Partitions in AS 2005.
    We have a process that processes dimensions and partitions based on a SQL table.  Sometimes when the it is processing two partitions at the same time (multi-threaded) for same measure group, server throws deadlock error.    This does not happen all the time.
    Both partitions are bound to different tables in relational database and I also traced the SQL Server and did not get any deadlock error.
    I searched for this error on Google and did not find anything.
    Anyone have any idea about this error?
    Thanks

    Hi All,
    when i  execute the job for cube refreshment,sometimes it is executing successfully,but sometimes it is getting failed with below error  
    Started:  4:08:08 AM  Error: 2015-01-14 04:55:21.03     Code: 0xC11D0005     Source: Analysis Services Processing Task Analysis Services Execute DDL Task     Description: Transaction errors: The lock operation
    ended unsuccessfully because of deadlock.  End Error  DTExec: The package execution returned DTSER_FAILURE (1).  Started:  4:08:08 AM  Finished: 4:55:21 AM  Elapsed:  2832.18 seconds.  The package execution failed.  The
    step failed.
    If any find the solution please post on it.
    Thanks
    Rambabu

  • Locking of transaction code

    How can I lock any  transaction code
    Regards
    Amitava

    Hi
    Go to T.Code SMO1.
    enter the t.code that you need to lock in the below tab. and in the screen the t.code will come
    select the lock option and tick over there.
    so that t.code wil be locked . you cannot use the t.code henceforth

  • DatabaseError: ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock

    Hi all
    There is script running in my database 'A' that will select some data from tables in other database through DBLINK and update some tables too. The script which 6 I am running for the past 6 monts succesfully. Yesterday I got error saying that,
    DatabaseError: ORA-02049: timeout: distributed transaction waiting for lock
    ORA-02063: preceding line from test
    I have tested the Link and its active no issues in DBLINk
    I understand the objects which I am accessing the table in locked mode,
    SQL> select OBJECT_ID,SESSION_ID,PROCESS,LOCKED_MODE from v$locked_object where
    SESSION_ID=121;
    OBJECT_ID SESSION_ID PROCESS LOCKED_MODE
    77391 121 21394 3
    i
    I killed the session 121 and in v$session status is Killed, but I am getting the same error repeating while running the script. And the session_id is still in locked_mode.
    Could please add some light on this?
    -Thanks
    Antony

    Hi,
    I have killed the session which caused blocking and the status is KILLED for the past two days. But still the object is in locked mode
    SQL> select OBJECT_ID,SESSION_ID,PROCESS,LOCKED_MODE from v$locked_object where
    SESSION_ID=121;
    OBJECT_ID SESSION_ID PROCESS LOCKED_MODE
    77391 121 21394 3
    How would I resolve this any idea
    -Thanks & Cheers
    Antony

  • Prodn Ord print prob (order locked under transaction CO02).

    Hello,
    The requirement is when I am releasing a producton order it should get printed. Now when I release and save production order, i get a message as "This order is locked under transaction CO02".
    The release takes place (status is REL), but th print does not take place (no spool in work order case LV01). If I reprint this order, it is printed correctly.
    If I double click on the message, I do not get any information.
    In OPK8 Flow control for transaction, eveything is * and the radio button Online is selected. Does this have any relevance in this case?
    I have not seen this message before during release of production order.
    Thanks in advance fo your assistance.
    Best Regards
    Sameer

    Hi ,
    1st  please check with your basis is the printer setup correctly.
    2nd assume everything setup correctly in Basis also hardware , please check your user profile.
    3rd please check in your printer spool sp01 is there any spool.
    4th please check the configuration been setup ? default after release should print.
    T-codes associated with this are
    OID1 - Shop Papers
    OID2 - Shop Papers by Document Type
    OID3 - User-Specific Print Control
    OID4 - Activate Print Diversion
    OID5 - Print Diversion Values
    OID6 - Print Control Online/Update
    Please rewad point if useful.
    TQ

  • Locking-Unlocking Transaction in APO

    Experts.
    Can anyone of you please help me with "user exits"  that can be used for locking & unlocking of transactions in APO Demand planning .
    We have a requirement where we want to lock & unlock transaction /SAPAPO/SDP94.
    Please drop your valuable inputs.
    Regards
    Rahul Chitte

    Hi ,
    I don think locking //SDP94 is logical. Instead we have to lock the planning book that you are going to update. There is a standard FM available to lock the planning book. I don get the name of this FM. Please explore in this view.
    Thanks
    Seema

  • Locked tcode with SM01

    Hello everyone,
    I'm trying to figure out why a tcode has been unlocked magically
    Actually, to upgrade our custom program, before transporting the change request, I decided to lock the tcode related to our program via SM01 so that end users won't have any problems if using it.
    The initial tcode was MYTCODE and was linked to PRG1.
    The upgrade was to change MYTCODE to be linked with PRG2.
    When looking at the security audit log (SM20N), the only thing I could find out, is that as soon as I transported the change request order, MYTCODE got unlocked.
    I contacted SAP Customer service and they said that STMS per se, cannot unlocked a tcode.
    So my guess is that when changing "the link", it automatically unlocked MYTCODE.
    Can anyone tell me if I'm correct ? or could give me possible other explanation ?
    Thanks and best regards,

    Hi,
    According to me when u locked a Transaction in one system any of the user can not access to that Tcode as it says it is locked in SM01 and this is irrespective to the Clients. like in which so ever Client you log in and try to access to that Tcode is throws tha same message ya.
    When you import the Change Reques to another system and here by default the Tcode is unlocked here and again you have to lock the Tcode again here.
    Kindly navigate in steps to the eror which you are facing.
    WIith Regards,
    Prashanth

Maybe you are looking for

  • Maximum Allowed Text Length for JTable Column

    Can you please help me with a JTable Doubt How do I set the Maximum Allowed Text Length for a Particular Column of a JTable?

  • How to get image in the matrix column.

    Dear All,                  I am using an add-on for displaying image in a matrix column. When user selects an item in the matrix, image corresponding to that item should be displayed in the matrix column. How can I do that.? Please help me regarding

  • Order of steps in retouching a photograph

    I am new to the entire graphics arts area.  (I do network design for a living).  I have been reading the "Adobe Photoshop CS5 Classroom in a Book" and I don't understand their logic for the order they say to use to retouch a photograph. Their order i

  • 32 bit Migration to 64-bit

    Hi all, We are currently building a recovery process for our Oracle 10gr2 32-bit software upgrade to Oracle 10gr2 64-bit. In the event something goes drastically wrong in our 64-bit environment, we would revert back to our 32-bit environment. The que

  • Database Control: File System Alert -

    I am using 10.2 on HP UNIX 11. My development database is installed on a server, which is hared by many other applications/database. DB Control sends me alerts when file system is more than 80% used or so. I do not want to receive any file system ale