Locking of Transactions for MM - FI Integration

Every month, we do the closing of accounts. For this, we have to close all GRN related transactions, so that the accounting entries are not passed. We use trxn SM01, to lock, MIRO, MIGO, & ML81N, so that user does not book any entries for that month.
Is there any other better way to achive this ?? if yes, can it be done by the user department , instead of coming to IT, to lock the transactions
thanks
amit

Hello,
There is fixed solution on for what you are asking.But its little bit tricky.
If you are aware of Validation rule .you can go and customise your requirement or take ABAPERS help.
Please use tcode GBB0 & Ob28 to create validation
For e.g
Prerequisite.
If posting day is after last day of month & tcode is MIGO,MIRO,etc
CHECK: User ids(only these user will have option to use this trx else it will give error.you can keep this access to only few like urself)
Error: Posting not allowed in previous month.
likewise you can custoimise your requirement.

Similar Messages

How to Lock a Transaction for Editing AND VERY minor tab cont. help

Just two things I need to ask about
1. How to Lock a Transaction for Editing
I am currently using the fcode ENQUEUE_E_TABLE. The function works as once the transaction in opened, another cannot access it.
However, I have two modes in my transction (Display and Edit). What I need to do is If another user has already opened the transaction, the other user can still access the transaction but cannot access the edit mode.
 2. VERY minor tab cont. help 
I noticed in a table control is being used in a transction you can resize a colunm. How do you disable this ?
and how do you resize the horizontal scroll bar so that you can limit scrolling upto the point where there are field columns?
Thanks for you help ppl and take care

Hi chad,
This link will help u know abty different types of locks that are available:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/7b/f9813712f7434be10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
For resizing all u can go to the table settings and u can do it.
Hope tis helps u,
Regards,
Nagarajan.

Transaction for activate the integration model

hi,
i created integration model using cfm1 transaction , how to activate the model ? in which transaction.
regards
muthuraman.d

Hi Mathuraman,
you can use the transaction CFM2 to activate your generated Integration Model. This transaction is used both for activation and deactivation of the Integration model.
For Initial transfers you can use the program RIMODINI also.
Let me know if it helps.
Regards
Gaurav

Lock Transaction for Specifi Users

Dear All,
Good Day,
We are planning to lock the transaction for specific user who doesnot use the transaction more than 3 months.
Please suggest me what will be the procedure.
Thanks in advance,.
Best Regards,
Suresh Kumar K

Hi Suresh,
Your idea of restricting users in using t-code is good practice. But as of now there is nothing like you can restrict user by locking t-code only for tht user/users alone.
1. You can lock the T-code but this will affect entire system.
2, You can remove t-code from the role, but this affect other user and if you wanted to make another role for only this user it will start getting to be tedious job, since you have to delete some roles create some other and alos user may use some t-code once every quarter for some of quarter end results and you have to seperate these t-code from others which was not possible, this will not workout so easily.
The only option could be probably if user doesnot login for more than 3months just lock him.
Regards...

Lock a tcode for particular user

Hi Experts
i need to lock few transaction for particular users only. we have n number of roles and the transactions have been assigned to some tcodes to be reasticted for a list of users. is there any method or program to built to restrict the users for few tcodes.is there any more query pl trigger me
regards
bala

hi
sagar:
as you said if i start creating roles to restrict some users then there atleast 25 tcodes are there to restrict and 120 roles are to be analyzed and the job becomes hefty by creating roles and there will too many number of roles and it becomes confusion in future forecast. there fore i nedd any suggestion like that the userscan be restricted when they are trying to access that particular code or lock the screen or inform them to not access these tcodes thro some message or writing a program to restrict the users while the user exits. i have an idea but i dont know how it will work - ( I am not a ABAPER) there should be tcode or program which should list tcodes authorized for particular users and where they can be locked like SM01 ( but it will lock for all) but locking for particular users
Am i more advanced??
regards
bala

Transactional Behavior of an Integration Process

Hi All,
As I have to optimise an existing BPM, to have some idea, I was going through the link describing 'Transactional Behavior of an Integration Process'.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/Helpdata/EN/25/a45c3cff8ca92be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
which tells tas follows.
'At runtime, the system normally creates a separate transaction for each step. The transaction then covers this step only. However, you can influence the transactional behavior of particular step types. In the step properties, you can define that the system is not to start a new transaction when the step is executed. The system then executes the step in the transaction that was started at the time of execution. Consequently, no background work item is created for the step and the database does not need to be accessed. In this way you can improve system performance'
But I am not able to understand, how to implement that for any steps. Could you please explain?
Regards,
Subhendu

Hi Subhendu,
i ve got some doubts it was in SP 17 available. Please search at [Release Notes for SAP Exchange Infrastructure|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c9/9844428e9cbe30e10000000a155106/frameset.htm]
Regards,
Udo
Edited by: Udo Martens on Feb 5, 2009 3:38 PM

How to lock a transaction code in a report ?

Dear Abapers ,
 i had a requirement to lock a transaction code in my Module pool programming . the requirement goes in this way ..
" if a single user is editing a report then that particular report has to be accesseble to only that concerned user , it cant be accessed to any other user who gonna run the report unless the first user exits the report . <removed>.
Thanks & Regards,
Sravani . Y .
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Apr 5, 2010 8:39 PM

Hi,
You have to verify the processes in execution. Here an exaple code:
DATA: BEGIN OF WP_TABL OCCURS 10.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE WPINFO.
DATA: END OF WP_TABL.
" This CALL verifyes the processes in execution:
CALL 'ThWpInfo' ID 'OPCODE' FIELD OPCODE ID 'TAB' FIELD
 WP_TABL-SYS ID 'CPU' FIELD WITH_CPU.
 " Now loop at table WP_TABL
 LOOP AT WP_TABL.
 " Inside this loop you have to check if the report field WP_TABL-WP_REPORT is been executed more than one time. The user field WP_BNAME tells you who is executing the program.
 ENDLOOP.
I suggest you, ask for an ABAPER help with this code example.
Hope it helps you...
Alexis Sánchez N.
SAP ABAP Developer Consultant
<please no company names in the posts, folks can view your business card if interested>
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Apr 12, 2010 4:50 PM

Lock between transaction branches of a global transaction

Hi,
I have an Oracle Database v.10.1.0.4, on which there are two schemas (A and B).
A table on schema A has a reference key on a table on schema B.
Now, i have a j2ee application that uses two distinct connection to performs inserts on both schemas within the same global transaction (using a JTATransactionManager), but i'm experiencing a lock in the following situation:
1 - On connection for schema B, a new ROW is inserted
2 - On connection for schema A, a new ROW is inserted referencing the new row in schema B, but the query is locked by the insert on schema B.
It is like the two transacions are loosely coupled and not tightly coupled as I would expect for distributed transaction on the same oracle instance (or at least they are not part of a global transaction and are treated as two distinct transaction).
Someone know if oracle jdbc drivers handle tightly coupled transactions for transaction branches on the same oracle instance that are part of the same global transaction?
Thanks,
Luca De Petrillo

http://www.myoracleguide.com/s/managelocks.htm

Defining Account Determination for Real-Time Integr

Dear all,
I haven't understood yet about Account determination for the real-time integration of Controlling (CO) with Financial Accounting (FI).
Please tell accounting process that use this account. And give me a detail example.
Thanks so much
Minhtb

Hello
This is the new feature in New GL accounting
During allocations in Controlling, most of the postings created do not affect Financial Accounting. These postings do not update any G/L account transaction figures; they are postings within Controlling. If, however, an allocation in Controlling leads to a change in the functional area or any other characteristic (such as Profit Center or Segment) that is relevant for evaluations in Financial Accounting, a shift occurs between the affected items in the profit and loss statement. For this reason, this information has to be transferred to Financial Accounting. This reconciliation between Controlling and Financial Accounting takes place by means of real-time integration.
As a result of real-time integration, all Controlling documents that are relevant for General Ledger Accounting are transferred from Controlling to General Ledger Accounting in real time. This means that Financial Accounting is always reconciled with Controlling.
A document is created in Financial Accounting for each posting in Controlling. This means that the detailed information contained in the CO documents is always available in reports in New General Ledger Accounting. This information can be sorted by the following, for example:
●     Functional area
●     Cost center
●     Internal order
Real-time integration replaces the reconciliation postings from the reconciliation ledger. Consequently, you do not need a reconciliation ledger.
If, however, you do not set the Reconciliation Ledger Active indicator in Customizing for the controlling area, you cannot use the reports belonging to report groups 5A* (5AA1-5AW1). You set this indicator in Customizing for Controlling under General Controlling ® Organization ® Maintain Controlling Area. The reconciliation ledger serves as the data source for reports belonging to the report groups 5A*. You find these reports in the SAP Easy Access menu under Accounting ® Controlling ® Cost Element Accounting ® Information System ® Reports for Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
Replacement reports are available as follows:
●     You find the reports in the SAP Easy Access menu under Accounting ® Controlling ® Cost Element Accounting ® Information System ® Reports for Cost and Revenue Element Accounting (New).
●     You can create additional reports in report group 5A21. You can assign the report group to any drilldown report of New General Ledger Accounting using the report-report interface.
●     From the report Financial Statements Actual/Actual Comparison, you can call up the report Cost Elements: Breakdown by Company Code. You find the report Financial Statement: Actual/Actual Comparison in the SAP Easy Access menu under Accounting ® Financial Accounting ® General Ledger ® Information System ® General Ledger Reports (New) ® Balance Sheet/Profit and Loss Statement/Cash Flow ® General ® Actual/Actual Comparisons.
You can define account determination for each controlling area. You do this in Customizing for Financial Accounting (New) under Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) ® Ledgers ® Real-Time Integration of Controlling with Financial Accounting ® Account Determination for Real-Time Integration. In this way, you use the same account determination as for the reconciliation ledger (transaction OK17). You can then use the reconciliation ledger reports to compare FI balances with CO balances.
Prerequisites
If you use real-time integration in at least one company code, you need to have activated company code validation for the related controlling area. You do this in Customizing for Controlling under General Controlling ® Organization ® Maintain Controlling Area ® Activate Components/Control Indicators. Otherwise, the reconciliation between Financial Accounting and Controlling at company code level is not possible.
In Customizing for Financial Accounting (New), you have processed the IMG activities under Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) ® Ledgers ® Real-Time Integration of Controlling with Financial Accounting.
Activate real-time integration for all company codes between which you want to make CO-internal allocations.
In the IMG activity Define Variants for Real-Time Integration, do not select all CO line items for transfer. If the same line items are to be transferred as through the reconciliation posting from the reconciliation ledger, select the following line items:
●      Cross-Company Code
●      Cross-Business Area
●      Cross-Functional Area
●      Cross-Fund (if you use Public Sector Management)
●      Cross-Grant (if you use Public Sector Management)
Features
Value flows within Controlling that are relevant for General Ledger Accounting such as assessments, distributions, confirmations, and CO-internal settlements are transferred immediately. The FI documents are posted with the business transaction COFI. They contain the number of the CO document. This means that you can call up the CO document from the FI document, and vice versa.
Activities
If a document could not be transferred because the posting period was blocked in Financial Accounting or no account was found, for example, the document is included in a postprocessing worklist. You need to check this worklist regularly and process any documents in it. From the SAP Easy Access menu, choose Accounting ® Financial Accounting ® General Ledger ® Corrections ®Post CO Documents to FI.
Example
An internal order for business area 0001 is settled to a cost center of business area 0002. The document from this allocation is transferred in real time to Financial Accounting.
Reg
assign points if useful

"I" transactions for CRM-ISU connection

I am trying to further restrict my standard role that we use for the CRM-ISU connection. I have everything working except I have to add a seperate S_TCODE object with I* in order for the connection from CRM to ISU to work. Does anyone know which specific "I" transactions this would be using? Considering there are 9,204 of them, I would just leave it with an asterisk but mgmt wants it more restricted. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Andy

These are the transactions needed; IC_LTX - IC integration
IC_LTXE - IC integration
ISU_CRM_IL_REMOTE - Dummy for Remote IL Access

XML scheme and Web services enhancement for MS Word integration in CRM 2007

Hi,
I am trying to use the Template designer and the web services tool in order to create a MS Word template for the quotation.
We have created a new web service, using the Web Service Tool
(transaction BSP_WD_CMPWB, type WS_DESIGN_TOOL). I can use this web service when creating a quotation word template and everything works fine.
I need to enhance the web service with some custom fields and logic. I found the blog:
Web-services enhancement for MS Word integration in CRM 2007
/people/community.user/blog/2008/11/18/web-services-enhancement-for-ms-word-integration-in-crm-2007
The blog describe how to enhance the web service, extend the output
structure etc.
We have done all the steps in the blog, and everything looks fine. When
we test the web service, using the Web Service Navigator, all the new
fields we added to the output structure are displayed. The WSDL
document also looks fine, displayed from the Web Service
Administration.
The problem occur when try to create the word template using the
Template Designer. The XML scheme is not displayed in the word
document. This only happens if we use an enhanced web service.
Anyone familiar with this issue?
Kind regards,
Johan Wigert

Hi,
You may have to upgrade your MS word 2003 to MS Word 2007.
Before you do that please opening View > toolbars > Task Pane and check if you can get XML Schema from the web service.
Regards,
Sandeep Chavan

Prodn Ord print prob (order locked under transaction CO02).

Hello,
The requirement is when I am releasing a producton order it should get printed. Now when I release and save production order, i get a message as "This order is locked under transaction CO02".
The release takes place (status is REL), but th print does not take place (no spool in work order case LV01). If I reprint this order, it is printed correctly.
If I double click on the message, I do not get any information.
In OPK8 Flow control for transaction, eveything is * and the radio button Online is selected. Does this have any relevance in this case?
I have not seen this message before during release of production order.
Thanks in advance fo your assistance.
Best Regards
Sameer

Hi ,
1st please check with your basis is the printer setup correctly.
2nd assume everything setup correctly in Basis also hardware , please check your user profile.
3rd please check in your printer spool sp01 is there any spool.
4th please check the configuration been setup ? default after release should print.
T-codes associated with this are
OID1 - Shop Papers
OID2 - Shop Papers by Document Type
OID3 - User-Specific Print Control
OID4 - Activate Print Diversion
OID5 - Print Diversion Values
OID6 - Print Control Online/Update
Please rewad point if useful.
TQ

SPRO (Customization) settings for PM-PP integration

Hi Everyone,
Though I know one or two customizing settings, I need to know all the SPRO settings for PM-PP integration. please be elaborative in your responses.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Please find standard scenario for SAP PM_PP integration.
The goal is to see maintenance work orders taking available capacity from
production work centers.
Production work center must be entered into the appropriate equipment master record(s).
The work order the 'system condition' must to set to "0" for PM
reservations.
Production work center is set to include "Proj:RqmtsNetwkMaint" (Standard formula SAP008) in both the Scheduling
view and Capacity view in the 'Other formula' field. The capacity requirements in "Extended" capacity evaluation
(transaction codes CM50 - CM55).
Let me know
Regards

Locking-Unlocking Transaction in APO

Experts.
Can anyone of you please help me with "user exits" that can be used for locking & unlocking of transactions in APO Demand planning .
We have a requirement where we want to lock & unlock transaction /SAPAPO/SDP94.
Please drop your valuable inputs.
Regards
Rahul Chitte

Hi ,
I don think locking //SDP94 is logical. Instead we have to lock the planning book that you are going to update. There is a standard FM available to lock the planning book. I don get the name of this FM. Please explore in this view.
Thanks
Seema

Transaction for Open Sales Orders

Hi Experts
can u let me know the Transaction for Open Sales Orders.
Regards,
kumar

you can check the tcode
VA05.
vijay

Locking of Transactions for MM - FI Integration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for