Tuxedo and MC/ServiceGuard

I am searching any kind of informations about the integration of Tuxedo in HP MC/ServiceGuard.
Is it possible to run on the same physical machine differents LMIDs (with differents @IP) which are in differents packages MS/SG ?
Thank you.

Hello Joey,
I would suggest that you use BEA WebLogic Server to provide a web interface to
your Tuxedo application. BEA has an API called "Jolt", which allows you to provide
a Java-based interface (via Servlets/JSP, etc.) to your Tuxedo application. I
am not familiar with how Tuxedo works with Apache/Tomcat, but I can assure you
that you will have a lot more support and features if you go with BEA's various
APIs and tools. Refer to the following links for more information:
http://dev2dev.bea.com/products/tuxedo/index.jsp
http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux81/jdg/dvintro.htm
http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux81/index.htm
Also, there is a newsgroup dedicated to BEA Tuxedo.
Best regards,
Ryan LeCompte
[email protected]
http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669
Joey <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
We developed a system that used tuxedo server to handle DB transactions
at around 1997, that client now requests an upgrade to allow web based
access to the DB.
There is one major concern about whether we should use Apache/Tomcat
or Weblogic. Anyone knows about the interoperability between Tuxedo
and Apache/Tomcat and Weblogic?
Moreover, since the installed Tuxedo is an old version, do we need to
upgrade the Tuxedo server, what sort of impact to the existing system
if we do that?
Thanks very much.
Joey

Similar Messages

Tuxedo and MS DTC

Has someone already used Tuxedo with MS DTC?
thanks,
Andre S. David

The MS SQL Server can be coordinated by an Open/XA Transaction
Manager (Tuxedo) OR MS DTC (Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator.
What´s happen if I use Tuxedo AND MS DTC?
Is it possible? example:
A Coordinator Tuxedo that already exist calling other
Coordinator that was made using MS DTC.
If it possible, Does someone know something about how can I do it?
Thanks for your reply,
ASD
"Manoj SASIDHARAN" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi,
Is it same as MS SQL Server?
rgds
MS

RE: Forte, Tuxedo and ACMS

Hallo Rick,
I have no confirmation about the actual status at Forté, but we
interfaced Tuxedo using a normal C wrapping.
It works very well, with good performances.
By the way, it exists a shareware about a Tuxedo interface. You can
download it from www.forte.com.
Let me know if you need more information,
Best regards
Fabrizio Genesio
Datasign AG für Informatik
Ch. d'Eysins 53a
CH-1260 Nyon, Switzerland
Tel. : +41 22 361 04 04
Fax : +41 22 361 01 10
Mobile : +41 79 601 81 31
E-mail : mailto:[email protected]
Web : http://www.datasign.ch
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Greenwald [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 1998 10:20
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Forte, Tuxedo and ACMS
All -
Does Forte have an interface to Tuxedo and/or ACMS? Have any of you
used it?
I would appreciate any information I could get. Please respond to me
directly, as I am not a regular member of the list.
- Rick Greenwald

If you look at the exception information in the iiop manual it
discusses exteneded propties DefaultThrowsClause, ThrowsClause and
IsThrowable.
If you mark your exception class with IsThrowable it will show up in the
IDL as an exception. If you use either DefaultThrowsClause(project) or
ThrowsClause(method) you will get the appropriate raises in the idl.
This will cause the idl2java to produce code which will allow you to catch
the exception.
Tom.
At 09:41 AM 1/29/99 +0100, Giuseppe Sorce wrote:
>
Hi all,
I am currently working to an architecture to establish a communication
between a Forte' server and a Java client, using Visigenic's Visibroker and
IDL mode.
I have problems when I try to raise a Forte' exception from a method
invoked by the Java client; I would like the exception class
(ProductException) not to inherit from the class GenericException, because
the IDL I want to generate must have this structure:
exception ProductException {
string message;
Using this solution, the client application gets blocked waiting forever.
I am currently working with:
- Forte' 3.0.G.2 plus WebEnterprise 1.0.B
- JDK 1.1.5
- Visibroker 3.1
My question is: is it possible to raise an exception from the Forte' side
that is
compliant to the IDL mentioned above?
Of course it should be caught from the Java side.
Thank you in advance
Giuseppe Sorce
CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
tel. +39-011-3168736
fax +39-011-3168212
e-mail [email protected]
url http://www.csi.it
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Forte, Tuxedo and ACMS

All -
Does Forte have an interface to Tuxedo and/or ACMS? Have any of you used it?
I would appreciate any information I could get. Please respond to me
directly, as I am not a regular member of the list.
- Rick Greenwald

Hello Joey,
I would suggest that you use BEA WebLogic Server to provide a web interface to
your Tuxedo application. BEA has an API called "Jolt", which allows you to provide
a Java-based interface (via Servlets/JSP, etc.) to your Tuxedo application. I
am not familiar with how Tuxedo works with Apache/Tomcat, but I can assure you
that you will have a lot more support and features if you go with BEA's various
APIs and tools. Refer to the following links for more information:
http://dev2dev.bea.com/products/tuxedo/index.jsp
http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux81/jdg/dvintro.htm
http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux81/index.htm
Also, there is a newsgroup dedicated to BEA Tuxedo.
Best regards,
Ryan LeCompte
[email protected]
http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669
Joey <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
We developed a system that used tuxedo server to handle DB transactions
at around 1997, that client now requests an upgrade to allow web based
access to the DB.
There is one major concern about whether we should use Apache/Tomcat
or Weblogic. Anyone knows about the interoperability between Tuxedo
and Apache/Tomcat and Weblogic?
Moreover, since the installed Tuxedo is an old version, do we need to
upgrade the Tuxedo server, what sort of impact to the existing system
if we do that?
Thanks very much.
Joey

Tuxedo and tomcat/weblogic

Hi all,
We developed a system that used tuxedo server to handle DB transactions at around 1997, that client now requests an upgrade to allow web based access to the DB.
There is one major concern about whether we should use Apache/Tomcat or Weblogic. Anyone knows about the interoperability between Tuxedo and Apache/Tomcat and Weblogic?
Moreover, since the installed Tuxedo is an old version, do we need to upgrade the Tuxedo server, what sort of impact to the existing system if we do that?
Thanks very much.
Joey

Hello Joey,
I would suggest that you use BEA WebLogic Server to provide a web interface to
your Tuxedo application. BEA has an API called "Jolt", which allows you to provide
a Java-based interface (via Servlets/JSP, etc.) to your Tuxedo application. I
am not familiar with how Tuxedo works with Apache/Tomcat, but I can assure you
that you will have a lot more support and features if you go with BEA's various
APIs and tools. Refer to the following links for more information:
http://dev2dev.bea.com/products/tuxedo/index.jsp
http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux81/jdg/dvintro.htm
http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux81/index.htm
Also, there is a newsgroup dedicated to BEA Tuxedo.
Best regards,
Ryan LeCompte
[email protected]
http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669
Joey <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
We developed a system that used tuxedo server to handle DB transactions
at around 1997, that client now requests an upgrade to allow web based
access to the DB.
There is one major concern about whether we should use Apache/Tomcat
or Weblogic. Anyone knows about the interoperability between Tuxedo
and Apache/Tomcat and Weblogic?
Moreover, since the installed Tuxedo is an old version, do we need to
upgrade the Tuxedo server, what sort of impact to the existing system
if we do that?
Thanks very much.
Joey

ClarifyCRM Tuxedo and Weblogic Integration

Hi All
ClarifyCRM 8.0 include Tuxedo transaction process engine(Tuxedo version 6.5). Is that possible to connect tuxedo service thought by WTC or Jolt on Weblogic server?
Base on user manual. I know Tuxedo could integrate with Weblogic by WTC and Jolt. But I'm not sure the program for "Clarify CRM Tuxedo" and "Tuxedo" is the same!
many thanks
Andy Wu

Hi
I am trying to use WLST tool for configuring Weblogic domain in 9.1 OFFLINE.
I have done with almost all except JTA configuration.
Can you please give me smaples for the same.
The following is part iof my script...
readTemplate('F:/AuctionDoc/Installer/inDomain.jar')
cd('/JDBCSystemResource/localNonTxPool/JdbcResource/localNonTxPool')
create('myJdbcDataSourceParams','JDBCDataSourceParams')
cd('JDBCDataSourceParams/NO_NAME_0')
set('JNDIName', 'jdbc/NonTxDataSource')
#JDBC settings and other JMS settings worked
But the JTA settings dint work
#=======================================================================================
# Set JTA timeout
#=======================================================================================
cd("/JTA/inInstDomain")
set("TimeoutSeconds", "1200")
set("AbandonTimeoutSeconds", "1200")
I have to do the above OFFLINE.
I could not locate the JTA folder or any thing related with JTA configuration to do offline using WLST
Can you please give an example of JTA settings
Thanks
Binu

About tuxedo and oracle8i

When Tuxedo and Oracle8i are on the same machine, they work well. But now Oracle8i
is moved to another machine. What should I do? modify ubb, RM or nothing?
please mail your suggestion to me!

When Tuxedo and Oracle8i are on the same machine, they work well. But now Oracle8i
is moved to another machine. What should I do? modify ubb, RM or nothing?
please mail your suggestion to me!

Oracle tuxedo and Oracle tuxedo message queue on top of a virtual machine.

Hi buddies.
how is it going?
A quick question.
So we are going to go live using Oracle Tuxedo 12.1.1.0 with Distinguished Bulletin Board Liaison and Oracle Tuxedo Message Queue 12.1.1.0 on top of a Virtual Machine (VMWARE) running Oracle Linux 6.2. However we want to know if there are any recommendations or mishaps in which we may face ahead by running Oracle Tuxedo on a virtual machine?
I mean, I am wondering if I have to worry about kernel parameters, virtual machine parameters or any other thing from which could mess up everything.
Another question.
Does oracle also provide virtual machines certification where Oracle tuxedo would run on top of ?
Todd Little-Oracle
Maurice G

Hi Bruno,
I'm not sure what you mean with Distinguished Bulletin Board Liaison. I'm guessing you mean a clustered or MP configuration? And is it truly a clustered configuration or just a single machine MP configuration?
Regarding configuration, are you using Tuxedo services as well or just Tuxedo Message Queue? The biggest issue related to OS configuration is around IPC resources. If you do a tmloadcf -c on your UBBCONFIG file, it will help you determine the minimum IPC resources required. In general I suggest configuring significantly more resources than the minimum to allow for future changes and for some of the parameters for heavier loads. In particular IPC message queue parameters are heavily dependent upon load. So make sure the maximum message size and queue size are large enough for your anticipated workload. You can monitor them under load using the ipcs command.
We don't certify virtual machine environment but support them as long as the VM vendor assures compatibility, which obviously VMware and Oracle VM both do.
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

How to send msgs to tuxedo and read from tuxedousing jca adapter at jboss6

Hi i had only Tuxedo ip and port number.i have to send messsages to tuxedo server and read from tuxedo server i did below changes at ra.xml and dmconfig.xml
what are the services i have to use plz give me reply .Thanks in advance.
my ra.xml is
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<connector xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/connector_1_5.xsd"
version="1.5">
<display-name>Tuxedo JCA Adapter</display-name>
<vendor-name>Oracle</vendor-name>
<eis-type>Tuxedo</eis-type>
<resourceadapter-version>11gR1(11.1.1.2.1)</resourceadapter-version>
<license>
<description>Tuxedo SALT license</description>
<license-required>false</license-required>
</license>
<resourceadapter>
<resourceadapter-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.TuxedoResourceAdapter</resourceadapter-class>
<config-property>
<config-property-name>traceLevel</config-property-name>
<config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
<config-property-value>80000</config-property-value>
</config-property>
<config-property>
<config-property-name>xaAffinity</config-property-name>
<config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
<config-property-value>true</config-property-value>
</config-property>
<config-property>
<config-property-name>keyFileName</config-property-name>
<config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
<config-property-value></config-property-value>
</config-property>
<config-property>
<config-property-name>dmconfig</config-property-name>
<config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
<config-property-value>D:\jboss-6.1.0.Final\server\mpayv4_dev\deploy\dmconfig.xml</config-property-value>
</config-property>
<outbound-resourceadapter>
<connection-definition>
<managedconnectionfactory-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.spi.TuxedoManagedConnectionFactory</managedconnectionfactory-class>
<connectionfactory-interface>javax.resource.cci.ConnectionFactory</connectionfactory-interface>
<connectionfactory-impl-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.cci.TuxedoConnectionFactory</connectionfactory-impl-class>
<connection-interface>javax.resource.cci.Connection</connection-interface>
<connection-impl-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.cci.TuxedoJCAConnection</connection-impl-class>
</connection-definition>
<transaction-support>NoTransaction</transaction-support>
<authentication-mechanism>
<authentication-mechanism-type>BasicPassword</authentication-mechanism-type>
<credential-interface>javax.resource.spi.security.PasswordCredential</credential-interface>
</authentication-mechanism>
<reauthentication-support>false</reauthentication-support>
</outbound-resourceadapter>
</resourceadapter>
</connector>
==========================
and dmconfig.xml is
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TuxedoConnector>
<LocalAccessPoint name="local_1">
<AccessPointId>dev_scurtis</AccessPointId>
<NetworkAddress>//ip:port</NetworkAddress>
</LocalAccessPoint>
<RemoteAccessPoint name="e1tst_tdtux01">
<AccessPointId>e1tst_tdtux01</AccessPointId>
<NetworkAddress>//ip:port</NetworkAddress>
</RemoteAccessPoint>
<Import name="TOUPPER">
<RemoteName>TOUPPER</RemoteName>
<SessionName>session_1</SessionName>
<LoadBalancing>RoundRobin</LoadBalancing>
</Import>
<Import name="ECHO">
<RemoteName>ECHO</RemoteName>
<SessionName>session_1</SessionName>
<LoadBalancing>RoundRobin</LoadBalancing>
</Import>
</TuxedoConnector>

Hi todd Thanks for your reply
iam using below java code in jsp ,iam not getting the response plz suggest me any changes
<%@ page import ="javax.naming.Context,
javax.naming.InitialContext,
javax.naming.NamingException,
javax.ejb.CreateException,
javax.resource.cci.ConnectionFactory,
javax.resource.cci.Connection,
javax.resource.cci.Interaction,
javax.resource.cci.InteractionSpec,
javax.resource.ResourceException,
weblogic.wtc.jatmi.TPException,
weblogic.wtc.jatmi.TPReplyException,
com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.TuxedoReplyException,
com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.cci.TuxedoStringRecord,
com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.cci.TuxedoInteractionSpec" %>
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Tuxedo Test</h1>
<%
System.out.println("Check Connection JNDI");
String result="";
result=Toupper("harikrishna");
%>
<%!
public String Toupper(String string_to_convert) throws TPException, TuxedoReplyException
Context ctx;
ConnectionFactory cf;
Connection c;
Interaction ix;
TuxedoStringRecord inRec;
TuxedoStringRecord outRec;
TuxedoInteractionSpec ixspec;
try {
ctx = new InitialContext();
cf = (ConnectionFactory)ctx.lookup("java:jca/tuxedo");
c = cf.getConnection();
ix = c.createInteraction();
     ixspec = new TuxedoInteractionSpec();
     ixspec.setFunctionName("TOUPPER");
     ixspec.setInteractionVerb(InteractionSpec.SYNC_SEND_RECEIVE);
     inRec = new TuxedoStringRecord();
     outRec = new TuxedoStringRecord();
     inRec.setRecordName("MyInputData");
     outRec.setRecordName("MyOutputData");
     outRec.setString(string_to_convert);
     ix.execute(ixspec, inRec, outRec);
     ix.close();
     c.close();
     String returned_data = outRec.getString();
     return returned_data;
     catch (NamingException ne) {
     throw new TPException(TPException.TPESYSTEM,
     "Could not get TuxedoConnectionFactory"+ne);
     catch (ResourceException re) {
     throw new TPException(TPException.TPESYSTEM,
     "ResourceException occurred, reason: " + re);
%>
</body>
</html>
=======================================
In tuxedo.lod at my jboo6/bin iam getting this informatin
e property Security.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use ON_STARTUP to create default session profile property ConnectionPolicy.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use 60,000 to create default session profile property BlockTime.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use false to create default session profile property Interoperate.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use 60 to create default session profile property RetryInterval.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 to create default session profile property MaxRetries.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use 2,147,483,647 to create default session profile property CompressionLimit.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use 0 to create default session profile property KeepAlive.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0188:INFO: Use 10,000 to create default session profile property KeepAliveWait.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSessionProfile]TJA_0189:INFO: Default session profile created.
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]factory = null
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]name = TOUPPER
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]iname = TOUPPER
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]rsvc == null, create new ArrayList with key= TOUPPER
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]factory = null
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]name = ECHO
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]iname = ECHO
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[,]rsvc == null, create new ArrayList with key= ECHO
4/30/12:2:59:09 AM:11:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSession]TJA_0193:INFO: Default session created between LocalAccessPoint local_1 and RemoteAccessPoint e1tst_tdtux01.

Urgent: Tuxedo and multiple Resource Managers

Hello,
I have a tuxedo service which updates Oracle tables and also updates
queues of MQ-Series. Is it possible for this Tuxedo service to
control the commit and rollback for both Oracle and MQ-Series??
Will tpbegin, tpcommit and tpabort control the commit and rollback
of both Oracle and MQ-Series?? If yes, do I have to build the tuxedo
service in the following manner:
buildserver -r Oracle_XA -r MQSeries_XA_RMI -f ...
What else do I need to do to make sure the transaction covers both
Oracle and MQ-Series in the tuxedo service???
Thanks a lot in advance.. Please do let me know any information
regarding this.. I would highly appreciate any help in this regards...
Vipul

Hello Vipul,
Resource Managers are assigned at Tuxedo Server Group level using
OPENINFO and all Tuxedo Servers belonging to a group can access
only this Resource Manager.
So we can have only one resource manager connection from a Tuxedo
server.
But there is an exception to this rule:
You can have more than one RM connections provided u don't want
the XA features (Global Transactions). U can connect to one RM
using XA (tpopen) and rest of the RMs using native interface or
non-XA interface (EXEC SQL CONNECT....). But here, u will be able
to do Global Transaction only using XA connections. Non-XA connections
do not participate in Global Transactions and hence cannot be rolled
back incase of failure...
Now, coming back to ur requirement:
1. Create a Tuxedo Server Group for RM Oracle
2. Create another Tuxedo Server Group for RM MQ-Series
3. Build a Tuxedo server for RM Oracle operations and put into
group using RM Oracle. (use -r Oracle for buildserver)
4. Build another Tuxedo server for RM MQ-Series operations and
put into group using RM MQ-Series. (use -r MQ-Series for buildserver)
5. Now create a service that calls Services from these Tuxedo servers
in a Global Transaction. (this can be built without -r RMNAME incase
it does not interact with RM directly)
HTH
regards
MS
"Vipul" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hello,
I have a tuxedo service which updates Oracle tables and
also updates
queues of MQ-Series. Is it possible for this Tuxedo service
to
control the commit and rollback for both Oracle and MQ-Series??
Will tpbegin, tpcommit and tpabort control the commit
and rollback
of both Oracle and MQ-Series?? If yes, do I have to build
the tuxedo
service in the following manner:
buildserver -r Oracle_XA -r MQSeries_XA_RMI -f ...
What else do I need to do to make sure the transaction
covers both
Oracle and MQ-Series in the tuxedo service???
Thanks a lot in advance.. Please do let me know any information
regarding this.. I would highly appreciate any help in
this regards...
Vipul

Tuxedo and High Availability

Can you provide some information on how Tuxedo can be configured in a high availability
environment. Specifically running Tux 7.1 on AIX 4.3 with HACMP/ES. I am planning
on running with a 'cascading N+1' configuration and have concerns over the ability
of the standby node to take over a failed node succesfully due to config dependancies
on the machine name. Is there a white paper detailing use of Tux in a high availability
environment ?

Found the answers and thought would share it.
1. Can load balancing be achieved in MP setup or is this a high availability configuration?
Both - MP supports load balancing and high availability 2. In an MP setup, can a workstation client continue to work even after the master node gets migrated? If so, can we have both (or all nodes and their WSL) listed in WSNADDR for this to happen
Correct.

Tuxedo and Network Address Translation(NAT) at Firewall

We made a sucessful connection through the firewall without Network Address Translation
(NAT)on the firewall, from one network to the other and what we found happened
was that the client machine makes a connection on port 8090 and then sets up a
successful connection to the server (WSL).The client then very soon afterward
makes another connection on
another high-port and everything works (WSH connection).
Whats not happening with NAT is that the second connection is not being made to
the firewall. The firewall and the router are not blocking the call. It is just
not being made.
Thanking you in advance!!!
Nathaniel

Nathaniel,
Take a look at the WSL -H option at
http://edocs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux80/atmi/rf540.htm#1534543
Regards,
Peter.
Got a Question? Ask BEA at http://askbea.bea.com
The views expressed in this posting are solely those of the author, and BEA
Systems, Inc. does not endorse any of these views.
BEA Systems, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of
the
information provided
and assumes no duty to correct, expand upon, delete or update any of the
information contained in this posting.
Nathaniel Sebolai wrote:
We made a sucessful connection through the firewall without Network Address Translation
(NAT)on the firewall, from one network to the other and what we found happened
was that the client machine makes a connection on port 8090 and then sets up a
successful connection to the server (WSL).The client then very soon afterward
makes another connection on
another high-port and everything works (WSH connection).
Whats not happening with NAT is that the second connection is not being made to
the firewall. The firewall and the router are not blocking the call. It is just
not being made.
Thanking you in advance!!!
Nathaniel

Tuxedo and Legacy Systems

Hi all,
My experience of legacy systems is very limited and was wondering if anyone can help.
Can tuxedo communicate with a legacy system (or does it depend on the legacy system) directly or is another product required? If so, what is this other product(s) and how?
Kind regards

Tuxedo supports interoperability with a wide variety of legacy systems.
The web page at
http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=index.htm&FP=/content/products/tux/learn/adapters/
describes the available Tuxedo mainframe adapaters. These adapters support
both IBM and Unisys mainframes, as well as any other system that can support
one or more of the protocols used.
In addition to these adapters, the WTC (WebLogic Tuxedo Connector) module in
WebLogic is available for interoperability with WebLogic, and
the Tuxedo Control is available for interoperability with WebLogic Workshop.
There is also a domain gateway process available to support interoperability
with the TopEnd transaaction processing monitor.
C, C++, and COBOL are all supported programming languages for writing Tuxedo
clients and servers.
<Mazhar Iqbal> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Hi all,
My experience of legacy systems is very limited and was wondering ifanyone can help.
>
Can tuxedo communicate with a legacy system (or does it depend on thelegacy system) directly or is another product required? If so, what is this
other product(s) and how?
>
Kind regards

TUXEDO and MQSeries 5.2 on AIX

I am currently trying to integrate TUXEDO 6.5 with MQSeries on AIX using global
transactions. Does anyone have te correct entries for the TUXEDO RM file, the
corresponding OPENINFO and the necessary environment variables to connect to a
remote QueueManager?
Thanks in Advance
Stevie

Based on the SunDS 5.2 Patch 6 release notes, looks like AIX 5.2 is the latest AIX version with official support from Sun:
http://docs.sun.com/source/820-3003
"The original release of Directory Server 5.2 has not been validated on IBM AIX 5.2. However, this update is validated on IBM AIX 5.2. The original release of Directory Server 5.2 has been validated on IBM AIX 5.1, but IBM AIX 5.1 is no longer supported by IBM."

Tuxedo and MSDTC Problem

We are currently experiencing a number of problems in Microsoft SQLServer 7 which
are related to "orphaned" XA transactions (stuck Awaiting DTC Resource) which
have been created by Tuxedo 6.5 and distributed into SQLServer. Typically the
problem seems to occur when a transaction is timed out by Tuxedo.
Our application GROUP uses a tmsbuilt resource manager called TMS_SERV.EXE which
is linked against the Microsoft xa_switch.obj file (using the udataobj/RM file).
The application then uses the Microsoft DTC function 'dbenlistxatrans' to escalate
the transaction into SQLServer using a database connection. Our GROUPS section
is as follows...
AUDITSGRP
LMID=IHSAUDITL
GRPNO=18000
TMSNAME=TMS_SERV
TMSCOUNT=5
# Generate Guid with program called 'guidgen'
OPENINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
CLOSEINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
Note that the OPENINFO string is passed in accordance with Microsoft's documentation
on using XA transactions with SQLServer (and has been verified as working). However,
while trying to understand the problem we observed that the Microsoft Documentation
specifies... "If you run multiple instances of a program on a system, each instance
of the program must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid". This raises the following questions...
1. Tuxedo enforces us having more than one instance of TMS (i.e. at least two
per group). Why are two needed, and how does this fit with Microsoft specifying
that each must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid ? Or in other words, what is the RmRecoveryGuid
being used for?
2. When we run our servers, we have up to 10 instances of the application, each
of which will have a transaction in progress. How many resource managers (TMS_SERV
processes) should we have, and once again how is this affected by the RmRecoveryGuid?
3. Does each instance TMS_SERV correspond with one application instance? If not
then how do they interact with each other?
4. When the service call finishes successfully, but the transaction has been timed
out by a TMQFORWARD, are one or more of the TMS_SERV processes still tied up with
rolling back the transaction, even though the application service has finished?

James,
Good luck mate! I was unlucky enough to have to work with tuxedo, XA and SQL
Server a while back on a project. The eventual outcome was that SQL Server was
not suitable as an industrial XA capable database and so use of XA was scrapped.
However it was SQL Server version 6. I can't imagine microsoft would have spent
much effort making SQL Server XA compatible as interoperability and software cooperation
are not their priority. No doubt they'll claim SQL Server works brilliantly with
MTS.
"James Lockwood" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
We are currently experiencing a number of problems in Microsoft SQLServer
7 which
are related to "orphaned" XA transactions (stuck Awaiting DTC Resource)
which
have been created by Tuxedo 6.5 and distributed into SQLServer. Typically
the
problem seems to occur when a transaction is timed out by Tuxedo.
Our application GROUP uses a tmsbuilt resource manager called TMS_SERV.EXE
which
is linked against the Microsoft xa_switch.obj file (using the udataobj/RM
file).
The application then uses the Microsoft DTC function 'dbenlistxatrans'
to escalate
the transaction into SQLServer using a database connection. Our GROUPS
section
is as follows...
AUDITSGRP
LMID=IHSAUDITL
GRPNO=18000
TMSNAME=TMS_SERV
TMSCOUNT=5
# Generate Guid with program called 'guidgen'
OPENINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
CLOSEINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
Note that the OPENINFO string is passed in accordance with Microsoft's
documentation
on using XA transactions with SQLServer (and has been verified as working).
However,
while trying to understand the problem we observed that the Microsoft
Documentation
specifies... "If you run multiple instances of a program on a system,
each instance
of the program must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid". This raises the following
questions...
1. Tuxedo enforces us having more than one instance of TMS (i.e. at least
two
per group). Why are two needed, and how does this fit with Microsoft
specifying
that each must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid ? Or in other words, what
is the RmRecoveryGuid
being used for?
2. When we run our servers, we have up to 10 instances of the application,
each
of which will have a transaction in progress. How many resource managers
(TMS_SERV
processes) should we have, and once again how is this affected by the
RmRecoveryGuid?
3. Does each instance TMS_SERV correspond with one application instance?
If not
then how do they interact with each other?
4. When the service call finishes successfully, but the transaction has
been timed
out by a TMQFORWARD, are one or more of the TMS_SERV processes still
tied up with
rolling back the transaction, even though the application service has
finished?

Tuxedo and MC/ServiceGuard

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for