Urgent: Tuxedo and multiple Resource Managers

Hello,
I have a tuxedo service which updates Oracle tables and also updates
queues of MQ-Series. Is it possible for this Tuxedo service to
control the commit and rollback for both Oracle and MQ-Series??
Will tpbegin, tpcommit and tpabort control the commit and rollback
of both Oracle and MQ-Series?? If yes, do I have to build the tuxedo
service in the following manner:
buildserver -r Oracle_XA -r MQSeries_XA_RMI -f ...
What else do I need to do to make sure the transaction covers both
Oracle and MQ-Series in the tuxedo service???
Thanks a lot in advance.. Please do let me know any information
regarding this.. I would highly appreciate any help in this regards...
Vipul

Hello Vipul,
Resource Managers are assigned at Tuxedo Server Group level using
OPENINFO and all Tuxedo Servers belonging to a group can access
only this Resource Manager.
So we can have only one resource manager connection from a Tuxedo
server.
But there is an exception to this rule:
You can have more than one RM connections provided u don't want
the XA features (Global Transactions). U can connect to one RM
using XA (tpopen) and rest of the RMs using native interface or
non-XA interface (EXEC SQL CONNECT....). But here, u will be able
to do Global Transaction only using XA connections. Non-XA connections
do not participate in Global Transactions and hence cannot be rolled
back incase of failure...
Now, coming back to ur requirement:
1. Create a Tuxedo Server Group for RM Oracle
2. Create another Tuxedo Server Group for RM MQ-Series
3. Build a Tuxedo server for RM Oracle operations and put into
group using RM Oracle. (use -r Oracle for buildserver)
4. Build another Tuxedo server for RM MQ-Series operations and
put into group using RM MQ-Series. (use -r MQ-Series for buildserver)
5. Now create a service that calls Services from these Tuxedo servers
in a Global Transaction. (this can be built without -r RMNAME incase
it does not interact with RM directly)
HTH
regards
MS
"Vipul" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hello,
I have a tuxedo service which updates Oracle tables and
also updates
queues of MQ-Series. Is it possible for this Tuxedo service
to
control the commit and rollback for both Oracle and MQ-Series??
Will tpbegin, tpcommit and tpabort control the commit
and rollback
of both Oracle and MQ-Series?? If yes, do I have to build
the tuxedo
service in the following manner:
buildserver -r Oracle_XA -r MQSeries_XA_RMI -f ...
What else do I need to do to make sure the transaction
covers both
Oracle and MQ-Series in the tuxedo service???
Thanks a lot in advance.. Please do let me know any information
regarding this.. I would highly appreciate any help in
this regards...
Vipul

Similar Messages

Export to MS Project and multiple resources to one role

Ok, after this rather cryptic title i will explain my problem:
We are currently in a project where we have the following requirement:
A download of cProjects needs to be imported into MS Project 2007.
When a project role is staffed with multiple resources in cProjects it is imported into MS Project as a single role with only the first resource attached to it. All the other resources are nowhere to be found.
Does anyone have a solution to this?
Edited by: Miel Claessens on Jul 16, 2010 12:57 PM
Edited by: Miel Claessens on Jul 16, 2010 12:58 PM

Hello Meil,
You can try to implement your requirement in BAdI DPR_MSP_CUST_FIELDS method CUST_CONVERT_DPR2MSPINT. Here you have to convert each and every Resource assigned to a Role as individual resource in MS Project. You have to use method CUST_CONVERT_MSPINT2DPR to convert it back in Project's format.
e.g. 1) Downloading Project to MSP --> Role 1 has Resource 1 and Resource 2 then in first method you need to Create entry for Resource 1 and Resource 2 and keep track of to which role these are staffed. But this will create individual entries for each resource and will not add the resources name to Project role. Other possible implementation would be that you can maintain the Employee number of each Resource in some Text field which is not used in Field Mapping and accordingly decode these Emplyee numbers while uploading the Project from Ms project.
2) Uploading Project from MSP --> Use second method CUST_CONVERT_MSPINT2DPR to decode the above implementation to fill the Project structure for Role and Resources.
You may check it if it is possible to implement it in that way.
As a standard, as metioned earlier, it is not possible.
Thanks and Regards,
Piyusha

(semi-urgent) RVS4000 and multiple (same port) NAT'ing

Hello -
I have a client who has one Internet connection and 2 different internal SMTP servers. Is there a way to NAT public mail/SMTP to each one? We have two public IPs.
Thanks

Hello Jeff,
Unfortunately the RVS4000 does not support One to One NAT. This restricts the router to only being able to use one of the IP addresses you have.
If you are intrested in a router that supports this feature, I recommend one of the following:
RV042
RV120W
RV220W

Multiple call managers and clusters sharing one application server

Hi
I need to program my application such that it can be shared by multiple call managers and clusters. That is, I can only have one application server, and as a result I need to tell my application from which call manager / cluster this "request" is coming from.
My question is how do we do that? do we have access to some parameters / variables, similar to "#DEVICENAME#", which can be used to pass the call manager identity to the application?
TIA

Use multiple instances of your application with different URIs (assuming the instances will not have to talk to each other), then, when configuring the service on each cluster, simply reference the specific URI of the application instance for that cluster. eg: Using Tomcat to host the PhoneMessenger application for Cluster1 and Cluster2, Deploy the same application twice: PhoneMessengerForCluster1 and PhoneMessengerForCluster2. The service URL on Cluster1 might be: http://app_server/PhoneMessengerForCluster1/servlet/PhoneMessenger , and for Cluster2 it could be http://app_server/PhoneMessengerForCluster2/servlet/PhoneMessenger

Tuxedo and MSDTC Problem

We are currently experiencing a number of problems in Microsoft SQLServer 7 which
are related to "orphaned" XA transactions (stuck Awaiting DTC Resource) which
have been created by Tuxedo 6.5 and distributed into SQLServer. Typically the
problem seems to occur when a transaction is timed out by Tuxedo.
Our application GROUP uses a tmsbuilt resource manager called TMS_SERV.EXE which
is linked against the Microsoft xa_switch.obj file (using the udataobj/RM file).
The application then uses the Microsoft DTC function 'dbenlistxatrans' to escalate
the transaction into SQLServer using a database connection. Our GROUPS section
is as follows...
AUDITSGRP
LMID=IHSAUDITL
GRPNO=18000
TMSNAME=TMS_SERV
TMSCOUNT=5
# Generate Guid with program called 'guidgen'
OPENINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
CLOSEINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
Note that the OPENINFO string is passed in accordance with Microsoft's documentation
on using XA transactions with SQLServer (and has been verified as working). However,
while trying to understand the problem we observed that the Microsoft Documentation
specifies... "If you run multiple instances of a program on a system, each instance
of the program must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid". This raises the following questions...
1. Tuxedo enforces us having more than one instance of TMS (i.e. at least two
per group). Why are two needed, and how does this fit with Microsoft specifying
that each must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid ? Or in other words, what is the RmRecoveryGuid
being used for?
2. When we run our servers, we have up to 10 instances of the application, each
of which will have a transaction in progress. How many resource managers (TMS_SERV
processes) should we have, and once again how is this affected by the RmRecoveryGuid?
3. Does each instance TMS_SERV correspond with one application instance? If not
then how do they interact with each other?
4. When the service call finishes successfully, but the transaction has been timed
out by a TMQFORWARD, are one or more of the TMS_SERV processes still tied up with
rolling back the transaction, even though the application service has finished?

James,
Good luck mate! I was unlucky enough to have to work with tuxedo, XA and SQL
Server a while back on a project. The eventual outcome was that SQL Server was
not suitable as an industrial XA capable database and so use of XA was scrapped.
However it was SQL Server version 6. I can't imagine microsoft would have spent
much effort making SQL Server XA compatible as interoperability and software cooperation
are not their priority. No doubt they'll claim SQL Server works brilliantly with
MTS.
"James Lockwood" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
We are currently experiencing a number of problems in Microsoft SQLServer
7 which
are related to "orphaned" XA transactions (stuck Awaiting DTC Resource)
which
have been created by Tuxedo 6.5 and distributed into SQLServer. Typically
the
problem seems to occur when a transaction is timed out by Tuxedo.
Our application GROUP uses a tmsbuilt resource manager called TMS_SERV.EXE
which
is linked against the Microsoft xa_switch.obj file (using the udataobj/RM
file).
The application then uses the Microsoft DTC function 'dbenlistxatrans'
to escalate
the transaction into SQLServer using a database connection. Our GROUPS
section
is as follows...
AUDITSGRP
LMID=IHSAUDITL
GRPNO=18000
TMSNAME=TMS_SERV
TMSCOUNT=5
# Generate Guid with program called 'guidgen'
OPENINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
CLOSEINFO="SQL_SERVER:Tm=TUXEDO,RmRecoveryGuid=4FA189C0-B7B1-11d3-9873-009027938567"
Note that the OPENINFO string is passed in accordance with Microsoft's
documentation
on using XA transactions with SQLServer (and has been verified as working).
However,
while trying to understand the problem we observed that the Microsoft
Documentation
specifies... "If you run multiple instances of a program on a system,
each instance
of the program must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid". This raises the following
questions...
1. Tuxedo enforces us having more than one instance of TMS (i.e. at least
two
per group). Why are two needed, and how does this fit with Microsoft
specifying
that each must have a unique RmRecoveryGuid ? Or in other words, what
is the RmRecoveryGuid
being used for?
2. When we run our servers, we have up to 10 instances of the application,
each
of which will have a transaction in progress. How many resource managers
(TMS_SERV
processes) should we have, and once again how is this affected by the
RmRecoveryGuid?
3. Does each instance TMS_SERV correspond with one application instance?
If not
then how do they interact with each other?
4. When the service call finishes successfully, but the transaction has
been timed
out by a TMQFORWARD, are one or more of the TMS_SERV processes still
tied up with
rolling back the transaction, even though the application service has
finished?

TES 6.1.0.x Multiple Client Managers

Hello:
I am trying to find out if there is anyone else using multiple client managers on a load balancer and if we could have a discussion regarding such a setup. We have this in our envrionment and it does work, however sometimes I see oddities with in the client - even if I log directly into one of my client managers, by-passing the load balancer completely.
Looking forward to hearing from anyone with a similar setup.
Regards,
Ceceil Rufo

We haven't done a formal load testing yet. But we have conducted training with 10 - 15 users and would experience performance sometimes people just getting kicked out. At the time though we were still finagling with server configuration settings for threads, cache and java heap. During training too what seemed to impact performance more was the browser and version, and workstation memory. For a web app, TES 6.1 uses a LOT of memory so there were some suggested tweaks that had to be done on some machines. We have more consistent performance on IE 9 (than IE 10), and Firefox 18+ was faster.
I have installed Jconsole and am planning to conduct load testing sometime this month where i could monitor server resource from Jconsole to get an idea where bog down really is.
There is a TES 6.1 presentation doc that sort of outlines approx sizing based on concurrent users - we fit in the 10 -20 concurrent users given that our CM has 12GB RAM (allocated 10GB to TES) and 4 core. So hopefully with two CMs we can have upto 40. We are open to adding more mem if needed. So what tools do you use for Load testing? Also I wonder if it was possible to automate Load Testing like with Jmeter or something. For now we just plan on getting 20 users together to perform set functions at the same time and measure that with 1 CM up and me looking in Jconsole.
I also notice the multiple connections, even see myself twice even when I only have 1 browser session. Not having had a chance to dig to deeply i was chalking it up to maybe that I didn't exit properly last time so that it has to wait 30 minuts to totally clear me (with time to live setting) out but haven't really tested formally. I will see about adding that to my testing. I would also think it would impact system in that some folks may cause the number of concurrent connections allowed to be exceeded if you have too many of these lying around but since they are not doing anything perhaps not performance as much? It will be good to confirm though that a single web session really only takes 1 connection and won't potentially spawn another somehow.
Our implementation being highly distributed with workgroups having full autonomy over their jobs - means every team needs to have access to Transporter. We have over 15 teams. Which is scary since that also takes resources from the CM - and also from a management and training perspective. We also haven't load tested the Transporter server interms of number of concurrent users that can be running Transporter on it at one time. Nor have any clear idea yet how we'll manage the mapping files. But we are also opening up Transporter to be installed by teams on their team server (only that they have to patch themselves) - I really wonder if we should just restrict Transporter access to just the servers our team manage and no one else can install it anywhere else.

Multiple AP Managers Question

Hi,
I've got a question concerning the configuration of multiple AP manager interfaces on -for example- a cisco WLC 2504. I've read the configuration guide but I'm not sure whether this is the way the protocol works. Say I want to distribute AP's (and traffic) across various AP Manager interfaces on the WLC. I would configure the following:
Create one management interface (which will automatically also be an AP-Manager interface)
Configure 1 (or more) Seperate ap-manager interfaces, assign them to a port number, and select "Enable dynamic AP Management". VLAN ID's will be the same.
Create a WLAN and configure it's interface to "management"
Is it correct if I state that the LWAPP protocol takes care of the discovery from the Access Point and sends information about the available AP-manager interfaces back to the AP and the AP knows which ap-manager interfaces are available, connecting to the least loaded one?
Thanks in advance for your time.

The AP manager communicates with the AP's using CAPWAP. The use for multiple AP managers to me doesn't make sense to do especially since its a 2504. I have always just used the management interface for AP management and assign a primary and backup port. You can do it the way you have stated, but what is the benefit. I have seen 5508's deployed using only one gigabit port and over 250 AP's and they had no problem.
Thanks,
Scott Fella
Sent from my iPhone

Multiple resource objects provision issue in OIM10g

Hi Team,
We're facing an issue regarding multiple access policy trigger for a specific resource object in OIM.
The scenario is whenever we try to process the enablement or creation of users through flat file recon, users are created / enabled with multiple resource objects in their resource profiles.
When we checked in User Resource Access History report, we observe that the access policy has been triggering multiple times for these users resulting in users with multiple resource objects. Amongst these one shows provisioned/Enabled and the other shows provisioning/in some cases Provisioned/Enabled.
Please advise as this has become an ongoing issue and also has led into data mess-up.
Appreciate your help on this one..
Regards,
Sagar

The terminology sounds a little confusing to me:
If you mean you wanna create multiple IT Resources for a single IT Resource Instance so that the user can select the appropriate IT Resource during request creation -> All good upto here. But then since the Object/Request Form attached to a resource would be the same, so any user would always see the same form fields for creationg request.
Example: Users creating request for Oracle Database Accounts but different server locations
If it means you just need to create multiple Resource Objects then its a straighaway standard requirement and could be handled with normal Connector Development methodology.
Example: Users creating requests for different resources like Oracle Database Accounts & Active Directory Accounts

OIM 11g - Mail Notification for multiple resources

User will be provisioned to 5 target system through access policies.So instead of sending 5 different mail notifications to the manager on the Create User task about the account creation, is it possible to send one consolidated mail about the provisioned resources in OIM 11g.

Hi,
How abt for the following requirement for sending single mail for multiple resources provisioned.
We have 3 Access Policies which is defined as follows.
1) Policy 1 -> R1,R2,R3 Resources
2) Policy 2 -> R3,R5 Resources
3) Policy 3 -> R1,R4 Resources
In such a case we will not be able to put dependencies on Resources and adding a task for sending email.

Creating Multiple Resource Objects for OOTB Connectors

All,
I am trying to create a second AD User resource object for the OOTB connector. I would like to think that the AD Connector (and all connectors, for that matter) was designed to handle the creation of multiple Resource Objects for the same Resource Types, but am I wrong? It doesn't seem like the OIM Connector can handle this easily.
Has anyone created multiple resource objects for a connector? Is this a fairly simple task, or will it require a large effort? Is it even possible? Any pointers?
Thanks!

I will provide a little help with the duplication. I found the best way to do it is to import the original connector. Go through the different pieces making each one have a unique name, that is not part of any of the other piece names. You need to have unique names for the following:
1. Resource Object
2. Process Definition - Provisioning
3. IT Resource
4. Form - Process
5. Scheduled Task
After you import the connector, rename each of the following to something unique. I would also update your process form to have a default value of your IT Resource, as well as your scheduled task values to point to the new unique names. Export the 5 items, no dependecies. The adapters will all be the same. Use find and replace for the values and then import the new XML. If it works, duplicate the XML for each of the new workflows you want to create.
-Kevin

Multiple Resources for one role CATS scenario

Hi
We are on cPro 4.5 sp 006
the scenario is
One Role (say Consultant): Multiple Resources (say Niranjan, Amit) at a time (using Edit in parallel)
We have Time confirmation against Role
We have activated Confirmations against Project header as well
now when i try to enter time in CAT2 for Niranjan (who is staffed first) i get all attributes like Project, Project subobject, WBS element etc.
for Amit however I get project and WBS header and I get Subobject as Object does not have a de
It allows Amit to save data but when i try to transfer data to cProjects using Report the program throws error.
Thus for single resource staffing it works not for multiple staffed resources
Any inputs on this.
Niranjan

Raised to SAP
Note: 0001344595

Blocking calls to resource managers

We've build a bunch of inhouse eLink adapters. Some of these adapters listen for
outbound calls
from RMs like oracle pipe/AQ, MSMQ etc. Those RMs offer API calls to retrieve
a message from the RM.
These API calls are blocking, but offer a timeout flag also. We'd like to use
the timeout flags, since
otherwise shutting down such adapters requires brute force (-w flag in tmshutdown).
We plan on
setting the timeout, catching those timeout "errors" and doing tpforward back
to our service. We figure
this would give Tuxedo possibility to shutdown the adapter in a clean manner.
I assume TMQFORWARD
does something similar (except it's not blocking at all, but the tpforward part).
Can someone tell me if this tpforward is safe or if there's a better way to do
this.
R(o)isto

Hi,
We've used this tpforward method in one Tuxedo server (smarter
TMQFORWARD implementation with dispatching capabilities). It worked
on Tuxedo 6.5 like charm, but when we upgraded to Tuxedo 8.0 we
started getting errors when shutting down the server (normal tmshutdown
-s <server name>. I don't have the log file available here, but IIRC
the error message was:
"LIBTUX-CAT 6031
ERROR: Unable to pre-process buffer before tranmission. Error code(val/val)
Description
While handling a message before transmission (presend), the system was
unable to process the message.
Action
Contact BEA Customer Support."
Shutdown fails leaving the servers in SHUTDOWN state (viewed through
"echo psr | tmadmin"), but if we re-run tmshutdown with same options,
server goes down with no errors.
I think we also got an error message saying "...tpacall tpforward
failed..." meaning the tpacall done from within tpforward did not
succeed as the service was not available.
I think 8.0 and 6.5 behave somewhat different in shutdown situations.
We had problems with TMSYSEVT in 8.0 as well. When you do tmshutdown -y,
all services are suspended (including ..TMSYSPOST advertised by
TMSYSEVT). Servers try to post shutdown messages as part of their
shutdown procedure and as ..TMSYSPOST is no longer available, you get a
whole bunch of error messages in ulog. This used to work in 6.5. The
problem is, that these tend to kill some servers as well. For example
BRIDGE dies after these errors (ulog contains a couple of ..TPSYSPOST
failure messages and then "bridge exiting" message). This leaves all
servers and IPC resources on our non master nodes (HP-UX and W2K
machines) hanging.
We can live without TMSYSEVT, but I'd like to get this tmshutdown
problem for our /Q drainer fixed. Could someone (Scott?) give some
insight on how TMQFORWARD does the polling. Our server does tpacall(...,
TPNOREPLY) from tpsvrinit. Then from within the service function it does:
void MY_SVC(TPSVCINFO)
while (messages in queue)
processMessage();
sleep(delay);
tpforward(MY_SVC,...)
I assume BBL suspends MY_SVC when tmshutdown is called, so the tpforward
fails. TMQFORWARD comes down with no error messages, so I must do
something wrong in my service function. Since this worked in 6.5, the
code can't be complitely wrong. We plan to use this same mechanism in
several servers, so I hope we can implement it in consistent manner.
TIA,
R(o)isto
Peter Holditch wrote:
Risto,
I have used this technique myself, and seen others use it, in lots of
Tuxedo applications over the years.
In short, it's safe!
Regards,
Peter.
Risto Toivola wrote:
We've build a bunch of inhouse eLink adapters. Some of these adapters
listen for
outbound calls
from RMs like oracle pipe/AQ, MSMQ etc. Those RMs offer API calls to
retrieve
a message from the RM.
These API calls are blocking, but offer a timeout flag also. We'd like
to use
the timeout flags, since
otherwise shutting down such adapters requires brute force (-w flag in
tmshutdown).
We plan on
setting the timeout, catching those timeout "errors" and doing
tpforward back
to our service. We figure this would give Tuxedo possibility to
shutdown the adapter in a clean manner.
I assume TMQFORWARD
does something similar (except it's not blocking at all, but the
tpforward part).
Can someone tell me if this tpforward is safe or if there's a better
way to do
this.
R(o)isto

Question about multiple resource objects using the same OID target account

In Oracle Identity Manager 11g with OID connector as a target system.
Is it possible to create multiple resources that use the same OID IT Resource. Each resource is responsible for provisioning certain OID attributes of the same OID account. For example 'OID User' would provision the basic account and a separate resource called 'Department1 User' would provision attributes not provisioned by OID User.

Yes, definitely. Here is how it would work:
- You would have to make sure that the resource OID User always gets provisioned first, so that the account exist when these additional attributes are being set for the user via the other resource Department1 User. You can do this with Resource Dependency in OIM.
- Now for using the same IT Resource, just create the new form and in the IT Resource type form field, map the properties to the same IT Resource Definition, so when the Provisioning Process gets invoked it uses the same IT Resource instead.
Thanks
SRS

Error to uncheck allow multiple resource object in design console

Hi
I need to uncheck the Allow multiple resource object in the Design Console, but operation generates an error and the change is not applied.
DB read: select distinct ugp.ugp_key, ugp.ugp_name, ugp.ugp_display_name from ugp ugp, gpg gpg where ugp.ugp_key = gpg.ugp_key and ( gpg.gpg_ugp_key in (23) )
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.516-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 0, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 0
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.516-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] DB read: SELECT count(*) as count FROM oug WHERE obj_key=7 and ( ugp_key in (1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23) ) and oug_write='1'
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.517-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 0, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 0
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.517-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] DB read: select evt.evt_key, evt.evt_name, evt.evt_package from dob dob, evt evt, dvt dvt where dob.dob_key=dvt.dob_key and dvt.evt_key=evt.evt_key and (dob.dob_name='com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOBJ' or dob.dob_name='com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj' or dob.dob_name='com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj' ) and dvt.dvt_pre_update_sequence>0 order by dvt.dvt_pre_update_sequence
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.518-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 1, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 1
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.518-07:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.SERVER] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcDataObj/save Error :Data Update Failed
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.518-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] DB read: select err_key, err_code, err_desc, err_rowver, err_remedy, err_count, err_last_occurance, err_action, err_help_url, err_severity from err where err_code='DOBJ.UPDATE_FAILED'
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.519-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 1, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 1
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.519-07:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcDataBase/rollbackTransaction encounter some problems: Rollback Executed From[[
java.lang.Exception: Rollback Executed From
at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.rollbackTransaction(tcDataBase.java:578)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.rollback(tcDataObj.java:904)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.doRollback(tcDataObj.java:867)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:538)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(tcTableDataObj.java:2906)

After applying BP06, Allow Multiple Option Cannot Be Changed From True To False [ID 1556385.1]

Error in uncheck allow multiple resource object in design console

Hi
I need to uncheck the Allow multiple resource object in the Design Console, but operation generates an error and the change is not applied.
OIM Version will be 11gR1.
DB read: select distinct ugp.ugp_key, ugp.ugp_name, ugp.ugp_display_name from ugp ugp, gpg gpg where ugp.ugp_key = gpg.ugp_key and ( gpg.gpg_ugp_key in (23) )
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.516-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 0, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 0
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.516-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] DB read: SELECT count(*) as count FROM oug WHERE obj_key=7 and ( ugp_key in (1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23) ) and oug_write='1'
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.517-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 0, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 0
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.517-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] DB read: select evt.evt_key, evt.evt_name, evt.evt_package from dob dob, evt evt, dvt dvt where dob.dob_key=dvt.dob_key and dvt.evt_key=evt.evt_key and (dob.dob_name='com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcOBJ' or dob.dob_name='com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj' or dob.dob_name='com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj' ) and dvt.dvt_pre_update_sequence>0 order by dvt.dvt_pre_update_sequence
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.518-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 1, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 1
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.518-07:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.SERVER] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcDataObj/save Error :Data Update Failed
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.518-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] DB read: select err_key, err_code, err_desc, err_rowver, err_remedy, err_count, err_last_occurance, err_action, err_help_url, err_severity from err where err_code='DOBJ.UPDATE_FAILED'
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.519-07:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Query: DB: 1, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 1
[2013-03-21T06:24:27.519-07:00] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [XELLERATE.DATABASE] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: xelsysadm] [ecid: 91039ee4d5030ad9:6a4e2a3a:13d88717e95:-8000-0000000000005521,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Class/Method: tcDataBase/rollbackTransaction encounter some problems: Rollback Executed From[[
java.lang.Exception: Rollback Executed From
at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.rollbackTransaction(tcDataBase.java:578)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.rollback(tcDataObj.java:904)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.doRollback(tcDataObj.java:867)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(tcDataObj.java:538)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(tcTableDataObj.java:2906)

After applying BP06, Allow Multiple Option Cannot Be Changed From True To False [ID 1556385.1]

Urgent: Tuxedo and multiple Resource Managers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for