Tuxedo domain issue

There is a very strange case here in my application. The GWTDOMAIN always terminated
abnormally and restarted again. I checked the core dump file it generated and
it showed me that it happened in '_tmrunserver()'. I do not know why.

Folks,
Hello. I am confusing !
There are 3 options ( sysdba, sysoper and sysasm ) for the command SQLPLUS.
Let me explain the commands one by one as below:
First, the command  $./sqlplus AccessId/myPwd cannot connect with SQL> and then we cannot start up Database Instance HRCS90 !
Second, I run sysdba option in the following order:
$./sqlplus AccessId/myPwd as sysdba
SQL>startup
SQL>@/opt/PT8.53/scripts/rel853.sql
SQL> select OPERPSDWSALT from AccessId.PSOPRDEFN;
Its output: OPERPSWDSALT: invalid identifier. I have checked the field is not created into table PSOPRDEFN.
Third, I run sysoper option in the following order:
SQL>shutdown immediate;
SQL>exit
$./sqlplus AccessId/myPwd as sysoper
SQL>startup
SQL>@/opt/PT8.53/scripts/rel853.sql
When run rel853.sql, I saw many insufficient priviledges regarding Create Tables.
SQL> select OPERPSWDSALT from AccessId.PSOPRDEFN;
Its output: OPERPSWDSALT : invalid identifier. This error is the same with option sysdba.
Fourth, I run sysasm option as below:
SQL>shutdown immediate;
SQL>exit
$./sqlplus AccessId/myPwd as sysasm
It returns: Logon denied.
As we see above, I have tried 3 options(sysdba, sysoper, sysasm) to run the command sqlplus AccessId/myPwd but the result of script rel853.sql  is not right.
My question is:
Can any folk tell me the correct order and commands to run the script rel853.sql ?
Thanks.
Folks,
Hello. All of the above 3 options are wrong. I have done below:
$./sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL>show user;
USER is "SYS"
SQL>startup
SQL>connect AccessId/myPwd
SQL>show USER;
USER is "AccessId"
SQL>@/opt/PT8.53/scripts/rel853.sql
Script completed.
Application Designer login into Database HRCS90 successfully now.
Tuxedo Application Server boot domain HRCS90 with 8 processes started.
The issue is solved. Thank you all very much.

Similar Messages

  • Remote tuxedo domain rejects connection from client only Tuxedo JCA Adapter

    I am trying to use a client only configured Oracle Tuxedo JCA Adapter 11.1.1.2.1 to connect to a remote tuxedo 10.3 domain. The connector is deployed to a JDeveloper 10.1.3.4 embedded OC4J container. The connector is failing silently when attempting to establish a connection with the remote domain. Locally, the JCA Adapter ntrace logs the following:
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[DMLocalAccessPoint,DMLocalAccessPoint]> (ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw==)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMLocalAccessPoint,DMLocalAccessPoint]_useSSL = false
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[DMLocalAccessPoint,DMLocalAccessPoint]< return(10)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createLocalAccessPoint]TJA_0233:Info: Default local access point for factory null created, access point id ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw==.
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createLocalAccessPoint]features = 159
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,startListeners]> ()
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,startListeners]< (20) return
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[DMSession,DMSession]> (__sess_0_0)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,myInit]_lap_name:ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw==
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,myInit]_rap_name:e1tst_tdtux02
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,myInit]_pro_name:__default_session_profile__
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]got _lap: com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.config.DMLocalAccessPoint@1f6bc1a
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]got _rap: com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.config.DMRemoteAccessPoint@1b75e54
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]got _pro: com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.config.DMSessionProfile@191f64b
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]sec = NONE
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[DMSession,DMSession]< return(60)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSession]TJA_0193:INFO: Default session created between LocalAccessPoint ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw== and RemoteAccessPoint e1tst_tdtux02.
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[DMSession,DMSession]> (__sess_0_1)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,myInit]_lap_name:ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw==
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,myInit]_rap_name:e1tst_tdtux01
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,myInit]_pro_name:__default_session_profile__
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]got _lap: com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.config.DMLocalAccessPoint@1f6bc1a
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]got _rap: com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.config.DMRemoteAccessPoint@1c0f654
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]got _pro: com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.config.DMSessionProfile@191f64b
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:DBG[DMSession,DMSession]sec = NONE
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[DMSession,DMSession]< return(60)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:INFO[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,createDefaultSession]TJA_0193:INFO: Default session created between LocalAccessPoint ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw== and RemoteAccessPoint e1tst_tdtux01.
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[TuxedoAdapterSupervisor,registerClientSideResourceAdapter]create default import
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[ServiceManager,registerImportedService]> (*)
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:INFO[,]factory = null
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:INFO[,]name = *
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:INFO[,]iname = *
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[ServiceManager,registerImportedService]register Default Import
    1/20/11:9:41:49 PM:10:TRACE[Route,Route]> (*)
    I can't determine if there are any problems from these log entries, but the remote tuxedo domain logs the following in the ULOG:
    155138.tdtux01!GWTDOMAIN.3495.4.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1073: ERROR: Unable to obtain remote domain id (ypjspNQ5QIPKmOyk1DlAgw==) information from shared memory
    155138.tdtux01!GWTDOMAIN.3495.4.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1509: ERROR: Error occurred during security negotiation - closing connection
    My understanding is that the client only configuration should connect to a remote tuxedo domain as an anonymous client instead of a peer tuxedo domain, but the remote tuxedo gateway domain listener is acting like the client has to be configured in its dmconfig file before it will allow the connection request. Is there a different kind of listener the client only configuration should connect to instead of the tuxedo gateway domain listener? How can a remote tuxedo domain accept a connection from an anonymous client if the client must first be specified in the remote domain's dmconfig file? Is this a tuxedo 11g only feature? I'm trying to connect to a tuxedo 10.3 server.
    The local ra.xml is reproduced here:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <connector xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/connector_1_5.xsd"
    version="1.5">
    <display-name>Tuxedo JCA Adapter</display-name>
    <vendor-name>Oracle</vendor-name>
    <eis-type>Tuxedo</eis-type>
    <resourceadapter-version>11gR1(11.1.1.2.1)</resourceadapter-version>
    <license>
    <description>Tuxedo SALT license</description>
    <license-required>false</license-required>
    </license>
    <resourceadapter>
    <resourceadapter-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.TuxedoClientSideResourceAdapter</resourceadapter-class>
    <config-property>
    <config-property-name>debugConfig</config-property-name>
    <config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
    <config-property-value>true</config-property-value>
    </config-property>
    <config-property>
    <config-property-name>traceLevel</config-property-name>
    <config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
    <config-property-value>100000</config-property-value>
    </config-property>
    <config-property>
    <config-property-name>xaAffinity</config-property-name>
    <config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
    <config-property-value>true</config-property-value>
    </config-property>
    <config-property>
    <config-property-name>remoteAccessPointSpec</config-property-name>
    <config-property-type>java.lang.String</config-property-type>
    <config-property-value>//tdtux01:9601/domainId=e1tst_tdtux01,//tdtux02:9601/domainId=e1tst_tdtux02</config-property-value>
    </config-property>
    <outbound-resourceadapter>
    <connection-definition>
    <managedconnectionfactory-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.spi.TuxedoManagedConnectionFactory</managedconnectionfactory-class>
    <connectionfactory-interface>javax.resource.cci.ConnectionFactory</connectionfactory-interface>
    <connectionfactory-impl-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.cci.TuxedoConnectionFactory</connectionfactory-impl-class>
    <connection-interface>javax.resource.cci.Connection</connection-interface>
    <connection-impl-class>com.oracle.tuxedo.adapter.cci.TuxedoJCAConnection</connection-impl-class>
    </connection-definition>
    <transaction-support>NoTransaction</transaction-support>
    <authentication-mechanism>
    <authentication-mechanism-type>BasicPassword</authentication-mechanism-type>
    <credential-interface>javax.resource.spi.security.PasswordCredential</credential-interface>
    </authentication-mechanism>
    <reauthentication-support>false</reauthentication-support>
    </outbound-resourceadapter>
    </resourceadapter>
    </connector>
    Thanks for any help.
    Steve

    Looks like this is an RTFM question. From:
    [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E18050_01/jca/docs11gr1/users/jca_usersguide.html]
    Is the following:
    Dynamic RemoteAccessPoint (RAP) Insertion
    In order to make default LocalAccessPoint to work, Oracle Tuxedo GWTDOMAIN gateway configuration is required in order to make this simplified /Domain configuration to work.
    GWTDOMAIN gateway must be modified to allow Dynamic RemoteAccessPoint (RAP) Registration. If DYNAMIC_RAP is set to YES, it will also update the in-memory database of the status of the connection from those dynamically registered RAP. If the connection from those dynamically registered RAP lost then the information about that RAP will be removed from the SHM database.
    GWADM must be modified to process the DM MIB correctly to reflect the connection status of those dynamically registered RAP. When the connection from those dynamically registered RAP lost their entries in the SHM database will also be removed so that the DM MIB query can return the connection status correctly.
    The dynamically registered RAP will be added to /DOMAIN configuration permanently. Their existence will only be known when the Session is established. Their existence will be lost when the connection is lost.
    The DM_CONNECTION Oracle Tuxedo /Domain DMIB call returns all the connected dynamically registered RemoteAccessPoint. All other dynamically registered RemoteAccessPoint that are not connected will not be shown.
    The OPENCONNECTION DMIB request will not be supported to connect to those dynamically registered RAP.
    The CLOSECONNECTION Oracle Tuxedo /DMIB request closes the connection and remove the session from those dynamically registered RemoteAccessPoint, and returns its connection status as 'UNKNOWN.
    The PERSISTENT_DISCONNECT type of CONNECTION_POLICY will be honored that means when PERSISTENT_DISCONNECT is in effect all connections request from any RAP, whether they are dynamically or non-dynamically registered, will be rejected.
    I must have overlooked this section when reading it. Looks like I've got more configuration to do.
    Thanks,
    Steve

  • What the best way to call twenty tuxedo domains from one weblogic server use WTC

    I need to call twenty tuxedo domains from one weblogic server use
    WTC. the Service be called in the twenty tuxdo domains are same, do I need to
    write twenty EJB in the weblogic server to call the same service? who have good
    adea to deal with this problem?

    Hi,
    I have a question on the second case. When the client doesn't care of which
    Tuxedo domain it is hitting. What happens if one of the Tux domain is down ? What
    happens to the client request to that domain ?
    Another question is lets say i have a Tuxedo configuration as MP mode( Multi
    machine mode) how does WTC load balance between the Tuxedo domains.
    Thanks,
    Srinivas
    "A. Honghsi Lo" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi xcjing,
    One way to handle your needs is to use local service name to remote
    reservice name translation. For instance,
    (in 6.1,6.0 WLS)
    <T_DM_IMPORT ResourceName="TOUPPER1" LocalAccessPoint="WTC"
    RemoteAccessPointList="TUX-DOM1">
         <RemoteName>TOUPPER</RemoteName>
    </T_DM_IMPORT>
    <T_DM_IMPORT ResourceName="TOUPPER2" LocalAccessPoint="WTC"
    RemoteAccessPointList="TUX-DOM2">
         <RemoteName>TOUPPER</RemoteName>
    </T_DM_IMPORT>
    <T_DM_IMPORT ResourceName="TOUPPER3" LocalAccessPoint="WTC"
    RemoteAccessPointList="TUX-DOM3">
         <RemoteName>TOUPPER</RemoteName>
    </T_DM_IMPORT>
    etc
    With this configuration if your client have to call "TOUPPER" service
    in
    TUX-DOM1 then you code your client to call "TOUPPER1" and the request
    will be routed to TUX-DOM1. The same way for request has to go to
    TUX-DOM3, your client calls "TOUPPER3" service and WTC will route it
    to
    TUX-DOM3. In this remote name translation you may have to write 20 EJB
    although they are almost the same. However, if your EJB can analyze
    your client input to decide which Remote Tuxedo Domain to send the
    service request to then you probably only need one EJB.
    In the case that your client does not care which remote Tuxedo Domain
    provides the service then adding
    <T_DM_IMPORT ResourceName="TOLOWER" LocalAccessPoint="WTC"
    RemoteAccessPointList="TUX-DOM1">
         <RemoteName>TOLOWER</RemoteName>
    </T_DM_IMPORT>
    <T_DM_IMPORT ResourceName="TOLOWER" LocalAccessPoint="WTC"
    RemoteAccessPointList="TUX-DOM2">
         <RemoteName>TOLOWER</RemoteName>
    </T_DM_IMPORT>
    <T_DM_IMPORT ResourceName="TOLOWER" LocalAccessPoint="WTC"
    RemoteAccessPointList="TUX-DOM3">
         <RemoteName>TOLOWEr</RemoteName>
    </T_DM_IMPORT>
    etc
    Will load balance your client "TOLOWER" service request among your 20
    remote Tuxedo Domain.
    However, there is a bug in WTC that causes the Remote Service Name
    translation functionality not working properly. It is fixed in the
    upcoming release of WLS.
    Honghsi :-)
    xcjing wrote:
    Thank you very much! But I still have question, give an example,
    twenty Tuxedo domain is named domain1,domain2,....domain20. The
    same Tuxedo Service: TOUPPER is deploy on those twenty Tuxedo domains,some time
    I need call the TOUPPER Service on domain1,saome time I need call theTOUPPER
    Service on domain3 or
    other domain depend on the input from client. you mean I need to importThe TOUPPER
    Service from twenty Tuxedo domains in the console,then write one EJBto call the
    TOUPPER Service,but how can the EJB know which Tuxedo domain's TOUPPERto call
    from?
    Thank you!
    "A. Honghsi Lo" <[email protected]> wrote:
    hi xcjing,
    You don't have to write 20 beans or deploy 20 beans because there
    are
    20
    remote Tuxedo TDomain you need get the service from. Of course, WLSand
    WTC does not prohibit you from doing it though. Whether you need20
    beans or not depend more on you architecture.
    To access 20 remote Tuxedo Domain from one single WLS with singleWTC
    you can configure 20 remote Tuxedo Domain in the BDMCONFIG (6.1,6.0)
    or
    from the console (7.0). You import 20 services one from each remote
    Tuxedo domain. You write one bean, and deploy one bean. Your WLS
    clients will be able to access THE ejb, the EJB will access the WTC
    service, and WTC will load balanced the service requests among the20
    remote Tuxedo Domain.
    Regards,
    honghsi :-)
    xcjing wrote:
    I need to call twenty tuxedo domains from one weblogic server use
    WTC. the Service be called in the twenty tuxdo domains are same,
    do
    I need to
    write twenty EJB in the weblogic server to call the same service?
    who
    have good
    adea to deal with this problem?

  • Tuxedo domain sizing question

    Background:
    This is a Peoplesoft app (PT 8.5, Tux 10gR3, Weblogic 11g)
    We are moving from 4 app server virtual machines which each hosted a tuxedo domain (4 vcpu each, actually getting slices from 8 physical cpu each) to one physical server with 12 cores (2 6 core procs). We only need this horsepower for 7 30 minute events per year (course registration). Otherwise a single domain is fine.
    We ran a test last event that showed a physical machine significantly outperformed the virtual when given similar resources, So we have decided to employ a large physical server.
    We intended to configure 3 Tuxedo Domains, mostl;y as it helps us compare to where we came from (Webserver VM will still host one domain) so we are effectively throwing 4 cpu at each domain. This comes from an understanding that we shouldn't have too many appsrv processes in one domain. We currently run a a pre-spun 25 appsrv procs each domain, and we get ok performance. From the looks of our physical server test, our performance will improve.
    During the peak of the registration event, we have around 500 sessions, we limited to 225 active http sessions on the webserver, which acts as the valve to the event. Note: all previous events were on PT8.48, OAS 10g.
    So , on to my question.
    Is there a way to make a single larger domain, with say 50 or more appsrv processes (mostly to avoid the config maint) or does anyone have any recommendations here?
    Any and all input appreciated.

    Hi,
    Take these comments with a large grain of salt as they are generalizations and not necessarily applicable to PeopleSoft. I'd really suggest asking this question in their forums as there may be PeopleSoft specific configuration constraints that I'm about to violate.
    In any case a Tuxedo domain can range from a single machine with a single 1 core processor, to many machines each with many cores. Once you move beyond a single machine, regardless of the number of cores, you are in a clustered environment, or what Tuxedo refers to an MP domain.
    Regards,
    Todd Little
    Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

  • WLS modifies Tuxedo domains configuration

    Hi,
    We are configuring WTC to connect WLS 6.1 to Tuxedo8. We alredy have a Tuxedo
    application than uses Tuxedo domains, so we have an Tuxedo domains configuraton
    (bdmconfig) before connecting to WLS. To connect, we configure the bdconfig.xml
    file (see below). We create the StartUp and Shutdown classes and run the simpapp
    aplication (using the Toupper EJB). When we startup the application again (and
    start the connection) whe realize that it modifies our own Tuxedo domains configuration
    dinamically.
    Why is this happening? Is there some way to avoid this?
    Any idea will be appreciate.
    Thanks in advance.
    Yol.

    "Yolanda Arroyo" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    Hi,
    We are configuring WTC to connect WLS 6.1 to Tuxedo8. We alredy have
    a Tuxedo
    application than uses Tuxedo domains, so we have an Tuxedo domains configuraton
    (bdmconfig) before connecting to WLS. To connect, we configure the bdconfig.xml
    file (see below). We create the StartUp and Shutdown classes and run
    the simpapp
    aplication (using the Toupper EJB). When we startup the application again
    (and
    start the connection) whe realize that it modifies our own Tuxedo domains
    configuration
    dinamically.
    Why is this happening? Is there some way to avoid this?
    Any idea will be appreciate.
    Thanks in advance.
    Yol.
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE WTC_CONFIG SYSTEM "http://www.bea.com/servers/wls610/dtd/wtc_config.dtd">
    <!--Java and XML-->
    <WTC_CONFIG>
    <BDMCONFIG>
         <T_DM_LOCAL_TDOMAIN AccessPoint="WTCSIFO01">
              <AccessPointId>WTCSIFO01</AccessPointId>
              <Type>TDOMAIN</Type>
              <Security>NONE</Security>
              <ConnectionPolicy>ON_DEMAND</ConnectionPolicy>
              <BlockTime>30</BlockTime>
              <NWAddr>//172.16.160.173:6511</NWAddr>
         </T_DM_LOCAL_TDOMAIN>
         <T_DM_REMOTE_TDOMAIN AccessPoint="SIFOWTC01">
              <LocalAccessPoint>WTCSIFO01</LocalAccessPoint>
              <AccessPointId>SIFOWTC01</AccessPointId>
              <Type>TDOMAIN</Type>
              <NWAddr>//172.16.160.173:6510</NWAddr>
         </T_DM_REMOTE_TDOMAIN>
         <T_DM_IMPORT
              ResourceName="TOUPPER"
              LocalAccessPoint="WTCSIFO01"
              RemoteAccessPointList="SIFOWTC01">
              <TranTime>600</TranTime>
         </T_DM_IMPORT>
    </BDMCONFIG>
    </WTC_CONFIG>

  • Tuxedo domain

    Hi all,
    I need help with a environment varible who I do not remember the name of,
    It preserve the timeout (TPETIME) between Tuxedo domains.
    Anyone know?
    Reagrds
    Mats

    Mats,
    You might be thinking of the TM_DOMAIN_KEEPTRANTIME environment variable. If this is set to y or to yes then GWTDOMAIN will use the transaction timeout for transactional request timeout instead of using the blocking timeout as it otherwise would.
    Regards,
    Ed

  • Creation of domain issues - migration from weblogic 10.3.0 to 10.3.5 versio

    Hello,
    i would like to kindly ask for a help with following issue:
    Basically we are migrating from the 10.3.0 to the 10.3.5 version. We are building the domain using the template in "silent mode". And when i try to create the domain with new weblogic 10.3.5 im getting some errors.
    The command to run the creation of the domain is following:
    ${WL_HOME}/common/bin/config.sh -mode=silent -silent_script=${SILENT_SCRIPT} -log=${WLLOGFILE} >> ${LOGFILE} 2>&1
    returnCode=$?
    SILENT_SCRIPT contains following commands:
    read template from "/local/wg372/BM/appl/config/NEW_DOMAIN_CONFIGURED.jar";
    write domain to "/local/wg372/BM/appl/BmDomain";
    set OverwriteDomain "true";
    close template;
    When i setup new env(solaris) with weblogic 10.3.5 im getting following error when the silent_script command (*write domain to "/local/wg372/BM/appl/BmDomain";*) is executed:
    2011-07-18 16:53:00,427 INFO [runScript] com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - succeed: read template from "/local/wg372/BM/appl/config/NEW_DOMAIN_CONFIGURED.jar"
    2011-07-18 16:53:00,427 INFO [runScript] com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - write Domain to "/local/wg372/BM/appl/BmDomain"
    2011-07-18 16:53:00,505 ERROR [runScript] com.oracle.cie.wizard.domain.silent.tasks.RunScriptTask - There was an error executing the script: /local/wg372/BM/appl/installer/silent_script
    java.lang.NullPointerException
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.security.SecurityGenerateLDIFT.buildSecurityInfo(SecurityGenerateLDIFT.java:460)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.security.SecurityGenerateLDIFT.<init>(SecurityGenerateLDIFT.java:119)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptExecutor.writeDomain(ScriptExecutor.java:718)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptParserClassic$StateMachine.processWrite(ScriptParserClassic.java:573)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptParserClassic$StateMachine.execute(ScriptParserClassic.java:429)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptParserClassic.parseAndRun(ScriptParserClassic.java:148)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptParserClassic.doExecute(ScriptParserClassic.java:110)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptParser.execute(ScriptParser.java:72)
         at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptParser.execute(ScriptParser.java:35)
         at com.oracle.cie.wizard.domain.helpers.Executor.runSilentScript(Executor.java:68)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at com.oracle.cie.wizard.domain.silent.tasks.RunScriptTask.runScriptWithExecutor(RunScriptTask.java:551)
         at com.oracle.cie.wizard.domain.silent.tasks.RunScriptTask.execute(RunScriptTask.java:335)
         at com.oracle.cie.wizard.silent.tasks.AbstractSilentTask.run(AbstractSilentTask.java:28)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    In Windows env im getting following error:
    create.domain:
    [exec] -mode="silent" -silent_script=J:/_dev/build/installer/silent_script
    [exec] << read template from "J:/_dev/build/config/NEW_DOMAIN_CONFIGURED.jar"
    [exec] >> succeed: read template from "J:/_dev/build/config/NEW_DOMAIN_CONFIGURED.jar"
    [exec] << write Domain to "J:/_dev/build/BmDomain"
    [exec] CFGFWK-60550: Script execution aborted. The script may contain an error.
    [exec] null
    CFGFWK-60550: - doc says
    CFGFWK-60550: Script execution aborted. The script may contain an error.
    Cause:
    Action:
    Level: 1
    Type: ERROR
    Impact: Configuration
    I tried to google for this issue, look into the weblogic documentation but with no luck.
    So i would like to kindly ask, if anyone of you perhaps could give me a hint/advise with this problem.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    thanks for the reply but im not sure if we are talking about the same thing. What i need is to upgrade the weblogic "DOMAIN" not the weblogic installation itself.
    Anyway,
    after some googling and testing im again stucked with another issue:
    1. First i have created the old doman (10.3.0)
    2. Then i have tested the domain with the new weblogic version 10.3.5 - as it should be (and is) compatible within those 2 versions
    ---> worked fine
    3. Then via offline WLST(of weblogic 10.3.5) i have managed to create new template with command writeTemplate(nameOfTemplate.jar)
    4. But when i try to create the new domain with the new template via WLST(of weblogic 10.3.5) im again stucked (im able to read the template in wlst but not able to writeDomain ) - error:
    wls:/offline> readTemplate('/home/wg372/tmp/new_template.jar')
    wls:/offline/BmDomain>writeDomain('/home/wg372/tmp/new_domain')
    Error: writeDomain() failed. Do dumpStack() to see details.
    wls:/offline/BmDomain>dumpStack()
    com.oracle.cie.domain.script.jython.WLSTException: com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptException: The application location must have write permission.
    at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.jython.CommandExceptionHandler.handleException(CommandExceptionHandler.java:51)
    at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.jython.WLScriptContext.handleException(WLScriptContext.java:1538)
    at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.jython.WLScriptContext.writeDomain(WLScriptContext.java:803)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at org.python.core.PyReflectedFunction.__call__(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.PyMethod.__call__(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.PyInstance.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.pycode._pyx3.writeDomain$15(/var/tmp/WLSTOfflineIni6651397525640719781.py:71)
    at org.python.pycode._pyx3.call_function(/var/tmp/WLSTOfflineIni6651397525640719781.py)
    at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.PyFunction.__call__(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.pycode._pyx24.f$0(<console>:1)
    at org.python.pycode._pyx24.call_function(<console>)
    at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.PyCode.call(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.Py.runCode(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.core.Py.exec(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.util.PythonInterpreter.exec(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.util.InteractiveInterpreter.runcode(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.util.InteractiveInterpreter.runsource(Unknown Source)
    at org.python.util.InteractiveInterpreter.runsource(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.management.scripting.WLST.main(WLST.java:173)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at weblogic.WLST.main(WLST.java:29)
    Caused by: com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptException: The application location must have write permission.
    at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.ScriptExecutor.writeDomain(ScriptExecutor.java:757)
    at com.oracle.cie.domain.script.jython.WLScriptContext.writeDomain(WLScriptContext.java:795)
    ... 29 more
    I tried to have a look around for the "The application location must have write permission." problem but again with no luck.
    Furthemore when i try to do the same with old domain template, with old version of WLST (of weblogic 10.3.0), i have no problems with creating of the domain.
    Any ideas?
    Ill keep you updated :-)

  • SharePoint 2013 multi App domain issues

    Hello,
    All urls on purpose have a space character, this is because the forum didn't let me enter URLs.
    We have a problem with the new feature of SharePoint 2013 March PU “New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain”.
    We are implementing this feature for a client in Windows Azure. This lead to several technical issues to overcome and in previous LAB tests it seems that we have overcome these problems, using named binding instead of wildcard, and SNI.
    Goal:
    1 Webapplication with three zones:
    Default zone: https: //portal-ntlm.contoso.com
    Intranet zone: https: //portal-adfs.contoso.com
    Extranet zone: https: //portal-fba.contoso.com
    Default zone in NTLM of course is to make Search work.
    With the new feature described in http ://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn144963.aspx we should be able to get App Domains working on all three (or at least two out of three zones).
    In my LAB (Single server farm, running SP2013 SP1) I currently configured two zones, both NTLM to test the basics.
    Default zone: https: //portal.contoso.com Intranet zone: https: //portal-ta.contoso.com
    I have enabled the feature using these commands:
    $contentService = [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPWebService]::ContentService
    $contentService.SupportMultipleAppDomains = $true
    $contentService.Update()
    Iisreset
    Then I do this:
    New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain -AppDomain app1.fabrikam.com -WebApplication https: //portal.contoso.com -zone default -port 443 –SecureSocketsLayer       (This command works)
    and then:
    New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain -AppDomain app2.fabrikam.com -WebApplication https: //portal-ta.contoso.com -zone intranet -port 443 –SecureSocketsLayer   (This one doesn’t)
    Then we get this powershell error in RED:
    New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain : The IIS Web Site you have selected is in use
    by SharePoint.  You must select another port or hostname.
    At line:1 char:1
    + New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain -AppDomain apps2-ta.talentenik.nl
    -WebApplication  ...
    + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : InvalidData: (Microsoft.Share...cationAppDomain:
       SPCmdletNewWebApplicationAppDomain) [New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain], Argum
      entException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAppCmdlets
       .SPCmdletNewWebApplicationAppDomain
    Extra info:
    I have tried using a single IP, multi IP, remove current IIS Binding, add the binding already etc. Nothing seems to work.
    When I change the PORT number of the second command to anything else it binds to the expected IIS Site but on the wrong port nr.
    The most strange thing also: I have a working set of VMs that actually works. I created a snapshot of the working situation. Reverted back to the before snapshot and tried to replay my steps but I keep running into issues when I try to add the second app-domain.
    Can anyone help me set this up.
    Thx
    Stefan Peters
                       

    I was in the same situation with my on-premises environment. I did a little bit more investigation and checked the code behind New-SPWebApplicationAppDomain. I wrote a full article about this issue
    http://www.vioreliftode.com/index.php/new-spwebapplicationappdomain-the-iis-web-site-you-have-selected-is-in-use-by-sharepoint-you-must-select-another-port-or-hostname/
    I also provided a way to bypass the limitation and be able to reuse the 80 and 443 ports for multiple app domains.

  • Windows 8.1 Pro join to domain issues....

    We bought some Windows 8.1 laptops and purchased the upgrade to the Pro version.  When I attempt to join the laptops to the domain, it prompts me for domain credentials, I enter them, and I get an error....
          Changing the Primary Domain DNS name of this computer to "mydomain.com" failed.
          The name will remain "mydomain.com".  The error was:
          The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted.
    Of course, the domain DOES exist and we have plenty of Windows 7 workstations signed into it just fine.  I hit OK then login to the laptop using a domain account.  At this point, I get an error telling me that no logon servers are available to authenticate.
    This is a Windows 2008 domain controlled environment.  Everything works fine otherwise for the Windows 7 systems, only these Windows 8.1 systems are having any issues.  The new laptops are even showing up in DNS on the domain controller.
    Any ideas what I might be missing?  Is there something special about joining Windows 8.1 Pro systems to a domain?

    OK; took a couple of more days than planned to get back on site.  We're continuing to do testing, but here's the IPConfig /ALL that was requested.  10.0.0.1 is the gateway, 10.0.0.10 is the DC.  The laptop is "Me-L" and the domain is "mydomain.com".
     The below was pulled after getting IP information assigned via DHCP.  The laptop is not joined to the domain at the moment and login is a local account.
    Windows IP Configuration
       Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Me-L
       Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . : mydomain.com
       Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
       IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : mydomain.com
    Wireless LAN adapter Local Area Connection* 3:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Wi-Fi Direct Virtual Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : A0-88-69-46-A4-CF
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Ethernet adapter Bluetooth Network Connection:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Bluetooth Device (Personal Area Network)
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : A0-88-69-46-A4-D2
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : mydomain.com
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : EC-F4-BB-9C-36-56
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.108(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:29:52 AM
       Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, August 27, 2014 11:29:50 AM
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.1
       DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.10
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.10
                                           10.0.0.10
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Wireless LAN adapter Wi-Fi:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : A0-88-69-46-A4-CE
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

  • Apply network settings join domain issues

    I create a default task sequence in CM 2012 R2. On the apply network settings there is the option to join the domain. If I select to join to the domain, there is an account to set.  I set the account and test the account (test button right there) and
    the test to ad succeeds.
    I then apply and close the task sequence.  if you go back into the task sequence, and check the account to join domain, the password is now much longer than the original (only dots shown of course) and if I click test, the test FAILS.
    I am not sure if that is the expected behavior or the root of my issue. 
    My issue is my machines are failing to join the domain.  Under Windows\Pather\UnattendGC, I see a log file with the error, failed to join domain, error code 5 (something like that).  When I look up that error, I see it means access denied. 
    Any ideas?

    The task sequence will never show the correct length of the password for security reasons, so that's the expected behavior.
    Could you share what permissions you've given that account?
    These are the permissions that I use:
    Scope: This Object and all descendant objects
    - Create Computer Objects
    - Delete Computer Objects
    Scope: Descendant Computer Objects
    - Read All Properties
    - Write All Properties
    - Read Permissions
    - Modify Permissions
    - Change Password
    - Reset Password
    - Validated write to DNS host name
    - Validated write to services principal name
    This will work for every kind of deployment scenario that you may have to use the account in.
    Regards,
    Nickolaj Andersen | www.scconfigmgr.com | @Nickolaja

  • WLC 802.11a/n Radio Regulatory Domain Issue

    Dear All
    We are facing an issue with a customer where a Cisco 4400 Series controller is blocking the 802.11a/n Radio Interface of a 1250 AP. The radio shows as down on the controller GUI. The error message on the GUI is that the 'Regulatory Domain' is not supported. This can be seen from the attached screenshot. Also relevant parts of the WLC configs are attached.
    WLC: Cisco 4402  Wireless
    WLC Country: SA
    Device: Cisco Lightweight Access Point 1250 (LAP) is controlled through the 4402 Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC)
    The operating system version of the LAP: c1250-k9w8-mx.124-18a.JA version of the WLC: Software Version 5.2.178.0
    The problem is that the controller shows that the 802.11a/n Radio Interface in Radio Slot # 1 is always down ,  the customer tried to manually 'no shut' the AP interface from the console and it worked , but obviously this solution would not work as the configuration cannot be saved (LW AP).
    Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards
    Farrukh

    Hello
    This is sort of like a testbed setup, so can you tell me which country/reg domain I can set on my controller in order to make our access point work. There is only one AP connected to this controller.
    LAP:  AIR-AP1252AG-N-K9
    Also as per the guide, we can configure the country on a per-AP basis, would this be a viable option?
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/5.2/configuration/guide/c52lwap.html#wp1147805
    Regards
    Farrukh
    P.S I think South Africa is ZA

  • IChat domain issue

    I am having an issue with iChat where I can't clients to login with (username)@(domain name) when the user name is a Open Directory user account. It works fine if local account. I can get Open Dir user to login if I use a fqdn (ichat.domain name.org). I do have the domain name listed in the Host Domain's list via Server Admin tool. DNS is hosted internally off the server and Externally by a hosting provider. Seeing that the local account works just fine externally and internally, I wondering if there is something other than DNS that is causing the issue. The only error I is: ODKVerifyClientRequestFixed: Unable to authenticate.
    I have search the forum and not been able to find anyone having this kind of issue. Does anyone have any ideas what could cause this issue?

    Hi,
    The problem is DNS related. You need to log in with a FQDN.
    [This |http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2298811&tstart=-1] is probably the most extensive thread that talks about the problem.
    If you still need help after reading that - please post real details from *sudo serveradmin settings jabber*, and *sudo changeip -checkhostname*
    Tim

  • Tuxedo Production Issue:LIBTUX_CAT:5005

    Dear friends,
    Problem : We getting the Tuxedo Error LIBTUX_CAT:5005 , in our Production Environment , frequently .
    The Impact : Tuxedo Is not at all responding , even tmadmin/tmipcrm/tmshutdown commands are not responding .
    Please help us to identify the root cause for this issue.
    Here is the Details of our Tuxedo Production environment
    TUXEDO MACHINE DETAILS
    Tuxedo Version : TUXEDO 8.0
    Patch : No Patch Applied
    Operating System : AIX Version 5.3 level 04
    oslevel -r : 5300-04
    Oracle client : SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.3.0 - Production on Sat May 12 19:25:18 2007
    System Model: IBM,9119-590
    Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER5
    Processor Clock Speed: 1654 MHz
    CPU Type: 64-bit
    Kernel Type: 64-bit
    Firmware Version: IBM,SF235_206
    Paging Space Information
    Total Paging Space: 4096MB
    DATABASE MACHINE DETAILS .
    Oracle Version : 10.2.0.3 (10g release2 patch 2 )
    Operating System : AIX Version 5.3 level 04
    oslevel -r -> 5300-04
    System Model: IBM,9119-590
    Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER5
    Processor Clock Speed: 1654 MHz
    CPU Type: 64-bit
    Kernel Type: 64-bit
    Firmware Version: IBM,SF235_206
    Paging Space Information
    Total Paging Space: 10240MB
    Entry details from ULOG .
    63924.mware02!bnatrx.11628728.1.0: Starting service BNATRX [Key = 0220B472201108A1A00000000000040000805402000000000180000000000000000.000000003241163925051268200000000588845     7132160032410376    BNAQTF4803550376            ]
    163924.mware02!bnatrx.11628728.1.0: NAZIM - Before calling stored procedure --- INPUT-FIELDS = [0220B472201108A1A00000000000040000805402000000000180000000000000000.000000003241163925051268200000000588845 7132160032410376 BNAQTF4803550376 QATIF 0151003|5001|10001SARSAR1040248100 1040248100 0001175.75 002008010810000000000000000000]
    163924.mware02!bnatrx.11628728.1.0: DEBUG: Just before bna_caller [Key = 0220B472201108A1A000000000000400008]
    163924.mware02!bnatrx.11628728.1.0: JUN B - Reply of bna_caller OUTPUT-FIELDS = [ATMFINUPD0320070512163925B003241             000000001001001000000000000000000000000000000025   BNA0376                         555500000000000000NOR66660000864UBCH2007051220070512SAR0000000000180.000000000000180.00BNA SEC Bill  # 1040248100              48              /025                    00000000000000000000SAR0000000000000.0001.00000020070512N      00000000000000000000SAR0000000000000.0001.00000020070512N      SAR0000000000000.0000000000000000000000SAR0000000000000.0000000000000000000000                    163925         000000         000000NNNNNNNNNN      085000000000000000                          NN1040248100     04        00C0001            0000000000000000000000000180.000020080108]
    163924.mware02!op2trx.14397630.1.0: DEBUG: About to call service 'GFCUPD'
    163937.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    163944.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: Entering service SDDTRX: [Key = BDSFININQ1120070512163944878800    ]
    163944.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: SDDTRX: TranCode/Numentries is SDDTRX01 0
    163944.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: DEBUG: Forward to GFCINQ: [BDSFININQ1120070512163944878800              000000001001001000000000000000000000000000000067   02BSF7690                       555500000000000000NOR6666000002901        26577893       03  ]
    163944.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: Entering service SDDTRX: [Key = BDSFININQ1120070512163944878805    ]
    163944.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: SDDTRX: TranCode/Numentries is SDDTRX01 0
    163944.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: DEBUG: Forward to GFCINQ: [BDSFININQ1120070512163944878805              000000001001001000000000000000000000000000000067   02BSF7690                       555500000000000000NOR6666000002901        26577893       03  ]
    163947.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    163948.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: Entering service SDDTRX: [Key = BDSFINUPD0320070512163947878810    ]
    163948.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: SDDTRX: TranCode/Numentries is SDDTRX01 0
    163948.mware02!sddtrx.12288238.1.0: DEBUG: Forward to GFCUPD: [BDSFINUPD0320070512163947878810              000000001001001000000000000000000000000000000067   02BSF7690                       555500000000000000NOR66660000864UBCH2007051220070512SAR0000000000703.450000000000703.45STC Bill Bill # 265778933                                                       00000000000000000000SAR0000000000000.0001.00000020070512N      00000000000000000000SAR0000000000000.0001.00000020070512N      SAR0000000000000.00                    SAR0000000000000.00                                        163947         000000         000000NNNNNNNNNN      022000000000000000                          NN265778933      01        00C03            0000000000000000000000000703.450020070415                 000000002007041520000000000000.0000   00000000000            00                                                                                                                        ]
    163957.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164007.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164017.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164027.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164037.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164047.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164057.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164107.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    164117.mware02!BBL.4866204.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:5005: WARN: USEM[0] lock appears stuck: held by pid=4096190
    Thanks In Advance for your help and support
    Nadeer
    Edited by nadeer78 at 05/13/2007 2:49 AM

    Hi Lin,
    I do know there was a problem with the Tuxedo 8.1 restart server under certain conditions (mostly related to having to restart large numbers of servers in a short period of time) that might have caused a problem like you are seeing.
    I suggest you contact BEA support and open a case with them. They'll have access to the best information regarding this type of a problem and will be able to help you get this resolved.
    Regards,
    Todd Little
    BEA Tuxedo Chief Architect

  • Moble me domain issue

    Hi Folks:
    I've got a weird issue. My iWeb publishes to a domain name, and that works fine, however, the domain name that defaults to my mobile me account is http://www.ebracco.com, which is not mine and I've never heard of it. I can't publish to it, and can't see a way to get rid of it either though the me.com interface, or the iweb interface.
    The site publishes where it supposed to, however, I can't "view" the pages from inside iWeb without going to http://www.ebracco.com...
    Any one else have the same problem?
    Thanks!
    Artem

    If I understand you correctly when you click the "Visit" button in iWeb it takes you to http://www.ebracco.com/ which is not your web address and the site displayed here is not your website. Is that correct?
    If that is the case then try the following:
    Reset your browser and visit again. (In Safari go to Safari > Reset Safari)
    Ensure all your software is up to date (Apple Menu > Software Update).
    Go to www.com.com and make sure this domain name is not on your account.
    Remove the following to the trash and restart the computer:
    Home > Library > Caches (I remove the whole folder. It will be re-generated upon restart.)
    Home > Library > Preferences > com.apple.iWeb (There may be more than one. Remove them all.)
    Launch iWeb.
    Click on your site on the left.
    Click on File > Publish Entire Site.
    Hope that helps.

  • Weird domain issue...

    So I had issues (who doesn't?) setting up my domain with GoDaddy but in the end with the help of some of you great people here I finally was able to. I know it worked this week, I had a co-worker visit the site using that addy. However, suddenly today I can't get to my site via the address I set up for it... that being this:
    http://halcyon7.com/
    Now I have noticed when I click on the "visit" tab in iWeb it takes me to this:
    http://www.halcyon7.com/halcyon7/Home.html
    Which is where it took me before. But I used to be able to access it from the first address as well, it just, what's the word, redirected me to the second address.
    So I don't know what to do. I have looked (but not touched) at the godaddy account settings, but nothing has changed since I set it up and it worked so I find myself at a loss.
    Anyone have any words of wisdom for me?
    Thanks,
    Stephen

    Hi Stephen,
    http://www.halcyon7.com/
    is working fine
    http://halcyon7.com/
    isn't
    So the questions would be:
    - How can I have them to work both?
    - Do I have to submit to .Mac halcyon.com rather than www.halycyon.com?
    - Do I have to contact godaddy?
    (sorry no answers as I don't have .Mac but maybe the questions will help to go further)
    Regards,
    Cédric
    Toooooo late....
    Message was edited by: Akdream

Maybe you are looking for

  • Different content iTunes Stores

    hi, it is very ridiculous, i just buy apple product (iphone), but why there are different content between itunes in each country..?? then I must doing syncronize music from my CD/MP3 collection just because I can't buy such items in iTunes US or any

  • Why is one file so large?

    Hey, Something has been going on... it's driving me crazy cause I can't figure it out, so hopefully someone out there can help solve it. I shot a video of a local event using three cameras. There were two shows that I video taped, both were exactly t

  • Create Delivery not allowed-status

    for an SD Order (Make to Order scenario), we are getting an eror that : ""Create delivery" not allowed (Syst Status Cost, object VB001776271717).  I am unable to understand this.  Can you please guide me.

  • Special effects editing question for iMovie '09

    Hi, I understand that iMovie '09 doesn't support many (any?) add-on software packages for special effects editing. Meanwhile, I'm editing some sports clips in iMovie '09,, in which I'd love to have a "spotlight" on a player, (where the other action/b

  • Is Logic 8 not optimized for dual core processing duties ?

    Running MacBook Pro 2.4 ghz, 2 gig Ram 200 gig HD external eSATA or FW 800. No other apps running. I am consistently seeing Logic 8 use ALL of the first core and barely tough the other - sometimes freezing up - saying that the CPU(s?) can not handle