Unable to forward engineer logical to relational (no apparent error)

SQL Developer 3.0.03, rpm install onto Fedora 13 using the embedded data modeling feature.
The logical model has engineered before, but I messed around with the relational (closed it, opened it, deleted, and recreated "relational_1") model and now when I press ">>" button, nothing appears to happen. I see no errors in the messages (and the Preferences log stuff doesn't appear to work properly as I never get a log in the specified location) nor does editing logging.conf appear to alter what is shown anywhere.
Anyone have this issue and know how to resolve it?

Hi,
Check this Re: Engineer to Relational does nothing DM3 Production
It might help you.
For the log file try to set path in Preferences to /sqldeveloper/sqldeveloper/extensions/oracle.datamodeler/log
That's the default directory.

Similar Messages

Logical vs relational

hi,
There are two notations in logical model (Barker and Backman).
The Backman notation in logical model looks like relational model in look and feel.
I want to know the difference between logical and relational in oracle data modeler.
How can i correlate with design theory like (conceptual, logical, physical) ??
regards

It does depend on how you define conceptual and logical.
I always use Barker notation for conceptual and logical as the diagram does not look like the relational/physical model diagram plus it allows me the option of using box-in-box to represent subtypes and to display relationship verbs phrases on the relationship lines. This helps when reviewing with the business.
For me a conceptual model will only have primary entities without attributes (but occasionally with natural keys), and unresolved many-to-many relationships. For a logical data model I will add all attributes, UIDs, datatypes (domains), null/not null flags, resolved intersection entities for the M:M, and reference/lookup entities.
I prefer the Barker notation because it does not show the inherited attributes from the relationships which helps me remember I am doing an entity relationship model not a database or implementation design. I then can forward engineer the logical to a relational model for Oracle or SQL Server (etc). One thing that forward engineering does is to covert the logical data types to the correct physical data types for the selected database. It also creates the PK and FK constraints that can then be generated into DDL to build the tables. You also have options on how to implement the logical subtypes (single table, separate tables, master table with siblings, etc)

Forward engineer entity names to table names

In my logical models I have entity names like "Operational Area". When I forward engineer these to physical tables is there a way to get SDDM to put an underscore between the words? In the preference-> Data Modeler -> Naming Standards setting I have specified "space" as the seperator for logical models and "_" for Relational.
The same thing happens with attribute conversion to column names: no underscores.
Edited by: Kent Graziano on Apr 4, 2011 10:41 AM

Hi Kent,
you need to select "Apply name translation" in engineering dialog - "general options" tab.
Philip

Delete rule from logical to relational model

hello!
I use data modeler Version 3.1.0.700 and I have some problems with delete rule.
I have set delete rule in logical model on every relation (NO ACTION) but when i engineer it to relational there is everything randomized.
How do i change this to be as it is in logical model?
Thank you for your answer in advance!
Grega

as I explained in previous post "delete rule"in logical model is used in only one case:
the setting in logical model is used only when relationship will be transformed into optional foreign key with non mandatory FK columns.Settings in compare/copy options" tab are used to exclude some properties from compare and engineer process.
Philip

Views always appear as different when engineering from Logical to Relational

I created some views in my logical model. After I engineer them to relational model, they appear in relational with an exclamation mark near the upper left corner. If I try to generate ddl for them, I get an error (-- ERROR: Invalid View VwTest). I realized that I have to "validate selected views", in order for the eclamation mark to disappear, and then I am able to generate ddl for them. After that, when I engineer from logical to relational again, it always shows me that my views are different. The difference is that in logical, my entities are shown between double quotes ("), while in relational, after the validation, the tables are not between double quotes. Is there a way to overcome this?
Thanks

Hi,
Thanks for reporting this problem. It appears that this is happening when the Entity name contains lower-case letters.
David

Engineering (logical to relational) does not do name translation/variable population as expected

I am using OSDDM 3.3.0.747.
I have set up the following template formats, e.g.
Foreign Key: {table}_FK{seq nr}
Unique Constraint: {table}_UK{seq nr}
When I engineer from logical to relational model, I get generated names like the following:
{TABLE}_FK3
TENANTS_UK{SEQ_NR}
TENANTS_UK{SEQ_NR}v1
How do I stop this from happening?

Hi,
thanks for reporting the problem. I logged a bug for problem related to Unique constraint.
For foreign key - there is no variable {table} in template for FK. You can use {child} or {child abbr} instead.
As workaround for Unique constraint - you can apply naming standards for whole relational model - "Apply Naming standards for Keys and Constraint" in context menu for relational model in browser, or at table level - table dialog
Philip

Engineering to and from logical and relational models

I have tried to modify a logical model entity by adding an attribute or two, tried to engineer to the associated relational model, only to have the engineering process create a brand new table rather than adding the new column or two to the existing table.
Creating the column in the table first and engineering back to the logical model didn't appear to do anything, although I might have missed a new logical entity.
Is this how the product is supposed to work?

Hello,
I'm sorry but your steps are not evident for me.How it works - you can start from table or entity, it doesn't matter which one is first you should be able to synchronize changes.
Let's assume you have two relational models RM1 and RM2 and table TABLE_1 in RM1. if you engineer RM1 to logical model then entity will be created that corresponds to TABLE_1 in RM1 (and it will be named TABLE_1 if you don't use glossary that provides replacement of TABLE with something else).
You can add attribute to entity and engineer logical model to other relational model (RM2) - new table will be created in RM2.
Add one more attribute to entity and engineer to RM1 - two attributes will appear showing that two new columns can be created - they are not selected and you have to select them if you want columns to be created.
You'll get only one new attribute (column) if you engineer to RM2 - the first added attributed is already there as column.
Of course you can add columns in tables and can synchronize them with entity in logical model.
Philip

I am unable to forward message in ios8

I am unable to forward message in ios8. After updating an iPhone 5s to ios8 I am
unable to forward messages. Selecting the more button does not bring up the bottom menu. Any ideas?

If you have really done that, then the next step is unfortunately a restore:
Back up and restore your iOS device with iCloud or iTunes
Use iTunes to restore your iOS device to factory settings
If you can't update or restore your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch

Column Prefix from Logical to Relational Model

Hi,
is there any option, that data modeler append an prefix (table short name) to a column, when the logical model will be transformed to relational model? (Same behavior as Oracle Designer)
Example:
Logical Model
TABLE: PERSON
TABLE-SHORT: PERS
COLUMN-1: ID
COLUMN-1: NAME
Relational-Model
TABLE: PERSON
COLUMN-1: PERS_ID
COLUMN-2: PERS_NAME
Kind Regards,
Stefan

Thanks for your answer!
This Script is not really working for me, because of our foreign keys.
All our Foreign-Keys are named "ID" (for nummeric column) or "INDEX" (for a varchar column). After the transformation form logical to relational all the foreign-keys are named like "ID1", "ID2", "ID3", "INDEX1", "INDEX2" etc.
There is no way to apply this script before the foreign-keys where added in the tables?
The Second Way is to create a new script for this task.
am i the only one with this problem? :-/

I am unable to forward my photos through iMessage here lately. I have iPhone5 and started having this problem within last month. Anyone have a solution I can try?

I have been unable to forward photos and videos within the last month on my iPHone 5. Anyone else having this problem and does anyone have a solution?

Hello,
I found the exact solution. It is very simple thank you. But I want to remove the passcode on my phone can anyone help me.
Thanks
Srini.

Logical to Relational mapping

Is it possible to define mapping between Logical and Relational objects (Entity->Table, Attribute->Column) manually?

no, it's not possible.
Philip

E90 unable to forward text messages after software...

Hi,
I recently updated my e90 to 300.34.84 software and now I am unable to forward text messages. You can only forward by manually typing in the numbers. If you choose via the "add recipient" option, it brings you to your contacts list and you can mark "x" on the box beside the name however there is no "ok" option, just a "back" option which if chosen, brings you back to the text message you want to forward without any name on the top. Any help on how to solve this is much appreciated

try doing the following on the senders iPhone : http://ios.wonderhowto.com/how-to/fix-delayed-imessages-text-messages-after-upgr ading-ios-7-0148663/
then see if you can receive SMS from him.

Unable to determine the value of component ''! Workflow error, please help

Hi All:
I am getting the error "Unable to determine the value of component ''" and workflows are not getting processed. I found OSS notes 879100 related to this issue but I am new to workflow and not sure where to start from! Here is the notes description:
The workflow WS20500025 ('Service Connection Order Processing') encounters an error directly after being started. The following error messages are displayed in the workflow log:
SWP102: Error at start of an IF branch
WL821: Work item 000000100012: Object FLOWITEM method EXECUTE cannot be executed
SWF_RUN535: Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
SWF_RUN534: Problems occurred when generating a mail
WL863: Notification of completion cannot be generated
SWF_EXP_001073: Unable to determine the value of component 'QUOTATION'
SWF_EXP_001072: Error in the evaluation of expression '<???>' for item 1
SWF_RLS_001101: Operator 'GT': The value of the left operand cannot be determined
SWP085: Error when starting work item 000000100012
SWP010: Error when evaluating the IF condition for node 0000000075
Other terms
Service connection processing, service connection workflow
Reason and Prerequisites
This is due to a program error.
The checks in the workflow Basis have been made stricter. A query of the type 'Quotation.number > 0' now causes an error if the container element 'Quotation' is not set. This is always the case if the workflow is is running without quotation prcessing, for instance.
Solution
The error is corrected in the next Support Package.
If you want to implement the corrections manually in your system, change the condition in step 000075 of workflow WS20500025 as follows:
&IS-U: Kundenangebot& EX
and &IS-U: Kundenangebot.Verkaufsbeleg& > 0
Save and activate the workflow.
I am new to workflow and not sure where to start from! Could someone please help me with this? Rewards assured.
Thanks.
Mithun

ANy ideas? Please help me if anyone knows the answer.
Thanks.
Mithun

I am unable to open my illustrator - I am getting the error 194:100

I am unable to open my illustrator - I am getting the error 194:100
can anyone let me know what this error is?

Chat Transcript:
Chetan C: Hello! Welcome to Adobe Customer Service.
Chetan C: Hi Ross.
Chetan C: We appreciate your patience and regret the inconvenience due to high wait time.
Chetan C: May I please have your email address registered with Adobe?
Ross: yes
Ross: sorry
Ross: ok
Ross: so you have the issue that i mentioned earlier?
Ross: my email address is ****************************
Chetan C: Yes, I will be glad to help you with the information.
Chetan C: Thank you for the email address.
Chetan C: We regret any inconvenience caused to you, we are facing the Technical issue regarding this and we re working on this issue to fix as earliest, please try to activate the applications after few hours
Ross: i did that. i spoke with someone at about 5am this morning and it's now almost 10
Ross: and now i'm at work and I'm remotely accessing this computer
Ross: and it's still having the same issue
Ross: despite the fact that I CAN log in and run programs on my other computer here at work
Ross: so when i access it from this computer here at work, it works fine
Ross: just not at my home computer
Ross: so WHAT is the issue?
Chetan C: I understand your concern. We are still working on this issue, we will notify you regarding this issue at the earliest.
Chetan C: This is a technical issue and we are working on it.
Ross: WHAT is the issue, though? and why would it ONLY be effecting my home computer and not other ones?
Ross: Can you tell me what error code 194:100 stands for?
Ross: ???
Chetan C: Ross, the issue which you are facing is an ongoing problem which our technical specialist is working on it.
Chetan C: This problem will be fixed within 24 hours.
Chetan C: Please allow us some times to fix this so that it can be fixed at the earliest.
Chetan C: Once again I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused to you.
Ross: Is there ANY detailed information you can give me in regards to why a server-related issue would only be affecting a single computer?
Ross: Or what the error code in question roughly translates to?
Chetan C: I am sorry, since we are from Adobe Customer Service we are not aware of the error which you are getting however, our technical specialist are working on it to get it fixed.
Ross: Can I speak with someone in the Tech Department via chat?
Ross: And if you're not aware of the error which I am getting, how do you know that it's an ongoing problem which people are working on and will have a solution to within 24 hours? That doesn't makes sense.
Chetan C: If I transfer this chat to technical team, you will get the same response.
Chetan C: But I want to assure you that it will be fixed within couples of hours.
Chetan C: The 24 hours which I said above is the maximum timeframe to get it fixed, however, it will sooner be fixed before the above timeframe as well.
Chetan C: I hope you can understand what I mean.
Ross: I just wish I could speak with someone who could tell me what the code stands for. Other than that, every time I contact Adobe I'll probably get the same blanket statement until they DO figure out what's going on. It's very frustrating.

Unable to browse OPC Server from the selected machine / Error -2147221163 occurred at GetOPCServerList.vi

Hallo,
I just installed LabVIEW 8.2 DSC-Module and tried to configure a OPC Client Instance. I get the Error "Unable to browse OPC Server from the selected machine / Error -2147221163 occurred at GetOPCServerList.vi". I have no OPC-Server installed, but is there no Demo-Server?
Thank you
Thomas

This issue might be related to opcenum not being registered correctly. Please follow the steps explained in this document to fix this problem.
As OPCdemo follows the OPC 1.0 standard it is not supported by the OPC client in LV DSC 8.x which supports OPC 2.0 and 3.0 servers. You can download an OPC 3.0 compliant demoserver from Matrikon.
I hope that helps,
Jochen Klier
National Instruments Germany

Unable to forward engineer logical to relational (no apparent error)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for