UNIQUE constraint but with a condition?

Hi!
Is it possible to define a unique constraint in a table which would apply only under a condition (depending on row content only) ?
For example:
CREATE TABLE example
pk number,
a number,
b number,
c VARCHAR2(10),
x number
The constraint would be UNIQUIE (a,b), but only when x is > 10.
So if x is not above 10, then same values for a nd b should be allowed.
Maybe with a view ?
Like this?
create view example_view ( unique (a,b)) AS
select a,b from example where x > 10
with read only; -- ??? needed? Regards,
David

Hello David,
not on the table directly, but you can define a Materialized View with your condition
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW check_example
   BUILD IMMEDIATE
   REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT
   AS SELECT a,b
   FROM example
   WHERE x > 10On this MV you can define your unique constraint. The refresh will fail if the condition is not met and you will get an error for your changes in the example table..
Regards
Marcus

Similar Messages

ORA-00001: unique constraint @ impdp with table_exists_action=truncate

Hi everybody
I can't understand why my data pump import execution with parameter TABLE_EXISTS_ACTION=TRUNCATE returned ORA-00001 (unique constraint violation), while importing schema tables from a remote database where the source tables have the same unique constraints as the corresponding ones on the target database.
Now my question is "If the table would be truncated, why I get unique constraint violation when inserting records from a table where the same unique constraint is validated?
Here are the used parameter file content and the impdp logfile.
parfile
{code}
DIRECTORY=IMPEXP_LOG_COLL2
CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
NETWORK_LINK=PRODUCTION
PARALLEL=1
TABLE_EXISTS_ACTION=TRUNCATE
EXCLUDE=STATISTICS
{code}
logfile
{code}
Import: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Gioved� 22 Ottobre, 2009 15:33:44
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connesso a: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
FLASHBACK automatically enabled to preserve database integrity.
Starting "IMPEXP"."PROVA_REFRESH_DBCOLL": impexp/********@dbcoll SCHEMAS=test_pump LOGFILE=test_pump.log parfile=refresh_dbcoll.par JOB_NAME=prova_refresh_dbcoll
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
Total estimation using BLOCKS method: 523 MB
ORA-31693: Table data object "TEST_PUMP"."X10000000_TRIGGER" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (TEST_PUMP.SYS_C00726627) violated
ORA-31693: Table data object "TEST_PUMP"."X10000000_BASIC" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (TEST_PUMP.SYS_C00726625) violated
Job "IMPEXP"."PROVA_REFRESH_DBCOLL" completed with 2 error(s) at 15:34:04
{code}
Thank you
Bye Alessandro

I forgot to read the last two lines of the documentation about TABLE_EXISTS_ACTION where it says:
"TRUNCATE cannot be used on clustered tables or over network links."
So it seems that it ignored the clause for the use of NETWORK_LINK and unreasonably opted for an APPEND action instead of throwing an error to highlight the conflicting parameters in the used configuration.
Bye Alessandro

Loop at table with unspecified type but with where-condition

Hi,
Doing a loop over an internal table with unspecified type and in addition using a condtion may be done as follows: Thereby the
condition would be "... WHERE parentid EQ i_nodeid" if the type of <it_htab> would be static. However dynamic specification of a component through bracketed character-type data objects is not possible.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <it_htab> TYPE STANDARD TABLE,
                                <wa_htab> TYPE ANY,
                                <parentid> TYPE rsparent.
ASSIGN me->ref_htab->* TO <it_htab>.
LOOP AT <it_htab> ASSIGNING <wa_htab>.
    ASSIGN COMPONENT 'PARENTID' OF STRUCTURE <wa_htab> TO <parentid>.
    CHECK <parentid> EQ i_nodeid.
ENDLOOP.
Since you have to loop over the whole table and to check within the loop whether the condition is fullfilled, this is rather bad for performance.
Questions: Are there any tricks to do this better?
Best Regards and Thank you,
Ingo

>
Lalit Mohan Gupta wrote:
> you can put the condition in the where clause....
only if you have the upcoming 7.0 EhP2 (Kernel 7.02 or 7.20) the following dynamic where works:
DATA cond_syntax TYPE string.
cond_syntax = `parentid = i_nodeid`.
LOOP AT <it_htab> ASSIGNING <wa_htab>
                       WHERE (cond_syntax).
in older releases you would have to use program generation to achieve a dynamic where... .
Kind regards,
Hermann

Select-options with where condition

Hello ABAPers,
I want to create a select-options like s_operid for vbpa-kunnr but with a condition specified is VBPA-KUNNR where VBPA-PARVW = 'WE'.
Thanks in advance. Pls reply asap. Points will definitely be rewarded.
Ritu

hi,
use this
PARAMETERS : TAB_ID TYPE ZALOAD_PROD_COMB-TAB_ID OBLIGATORY.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR TAB_ID.
DATA : BEGIN OF INT_TAB_ID OCCURS 0,
            TAB_ID TYPE ZALOAD_PROD_COMB-TAB_ID,
         END OF INT_TAB_ID.
DATA : LOC_MAX TYPE ZALOAD_PROD_COMB-TAB_ID.
CLEAR INT_TAB_ID.
REFRESH INT_TAB_ID.
SELECT MAX( TAB_ID) INTO (LOC_MAX) FROM ZALOAD_PROD_COMB.
COUNT = LOC_MAX + 1.
DO 10 TIMES.
    MOVE COUNT TO INT_TAB_ID-TAB_ID.
    APPEND INT_TAB_ID.
    COUNT = COUNT + 1.
ENDDO.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
    EXPORTING
     RETFIELD            = 'TAB_ID'                        u201C Internal table field name
     DYNPPROG         = 'PROG_NAME                  u201C Program name
     DYNPNR              = SY-DYNNR
     DYNPROFIELD   = 'TAB_ID'                        u201C Field where u need F4 help
     VALUE_ORG       = 'S'
   WINDOW_TITLE = u2018Any descriptionu2019
    TABLES
      VALUE_TAB      = INT_TAB_ID.                   u201C Internal table name
Mark the post answered once ur problem is solved ....

MDX Calculated Member With Multiple Conditions

I need to create a calculated member in my cube that spans multiple dimensions. A current calculated member looks like this:
[Employee Hours Category].[Utilization Category].[NON-PTO], [Measures].[Employee Hours]
This calculated member returns all the hours an employee worked that are not PTO.
I need to select employee hours but with multiple conditions:
- [DIM BILL STATUS][Bill Status] equals 0
- [Employee Hours Time Category].[Time Category] equals "Client Facing"
- [DIM PROJECT].[Client] isn't like "Olson"
I know this is probably pretty easy, but I'm horrible with MDX!
Thank you!!
A. M. Robinson

Thank you...
Your answer looks good but I was actually able to figure out most of it, but still looking how to incorporate a FILTER into the MDX. I would like to FILTER like this:
FILTER ([DIM Project].[Client].[Client].Members ,
NOT InStr([DIM Project].[Client].CurrentMember.MEMBER_NAME, "Olson")
Heres the MDX I have so far that is working fine:
([Employee Hours Time Category].[Time Category].&[Client Facing],
[DIM BILL STATUS].[Bill Status ID].&[1], [Measures].[Employee Hours])
Do you just wrap the whole MDX in the filter, and if so, how would that be formatted?
A. M. Robinson

Insert called before delete in a collection with unique constraint

Hi all,
I have a simple @OneToMany private mapping:
private Collection<Item> items;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Collection<Item> getItems() {
return items;
public void setItems(Collection<Item> items) {
this.items = items;
public void customize(ClassDescriptor classDescriptor) throws Exception {
OneToManyMapping mapping = (OneToManyMapping)
classDescriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("items");
mapping.privateOwnedRelationship();
I have a unique constraint on my Items table that a certain value cannot be duplicated.
My problem appears when I remove a previously saved item from the collection and add a new item containing the same data, at the same time.
After I save the parent and do a flush, I receive SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException because TopLink performs first an insert query instead of deleting the existing item.
I tested the application and everything went fine with: remove item / save parent / insert item / save parent
I checked on the Internet and the documentation but didn't find anything similar to my problem. I tried debugging TopLink's internal calls but I'm missing some general ideas about all the inner workings and don't know what to look for. I use TopLink version: Oracle TopLink Essentials - 2.1 (Build b60e-fcs (12/23/2008))
Does anyone have a hint of what to look for?
Edited by: wise_guybg on Sep 25, 2009 4:01 PM
Edited by: wise_guybg on Oct 5, 2009 11:22 AM

Thank you for the suggestions James
As I mentioned briefly I have done some debugging but couldn't understand how collections are updated. What I did find out is that setShouldPerformDeletesFirst() doesn't come into play in this case because this is not a consecutive change on entities.
What I have in my case is a collection inside an entity that the user has tampered with and now TopLink has to do a merge. I cannot call flush() in the middle since the user has not approved that the changes made to the entity should be saved.
I see that for TopLink it's not easy to figure out the order in which changes were made to a collection. Here is pseudo-code of when the constraint is touched:
entity.items.remove(a)
entity.items.add(b)
merge(entity)
And here is code that executes without a problem:
entity.items.remove(a)
merge(entity)
entity.items.add(b)
merge(entity)
So once again, I think that collection changes are managed differently but I don't find a way to tell TopLink how to handle them. Any ideas?

Table with unique Constraint

Dear All
i have a a project ADF-BC / JSF - JDeveloper 11.1.2.3.0 latest, and i have EO contains PK constrain in db in 2 fields (userid & Roleid) and i implemented bundle to handle error message with jbo error code and it works fine in AM test
and i have VO contains LOV in one attribute of this unique constrain columns (Roleid), now i dropped VO in jsf page as a af:table as below with input text with list of values for roleid and auto submit = true , and i face unexpected behavior from lov attribute in case of entering repeated value ..
when i enter another repeated value , it give me error message i created in the bundle and everything ok until now
but when i tab out of input text with list of values , it go back to old value as may be validation fired in back ground , it is not a problem until now
when i try to make anything else, he still gives me error message of duplicated key
i change the value again to correct value to avoid duplication error message , i am surprised , still i get the error message and shows me the repeated value again !!
simply it still save the old repeated value however i corrected , please any one help me to know what is happening and how to solve ?
Attribute in EO :
<Attribute
Name="RoleId"
Precision="10"
ColumnName="ROLE_ID"
SQLType="VARCHAR"
Type="java.lang.String"
ColumnType="VARCHAR2"
TableName="USER_ROLES"
PrimaryKey="true">
<DesignTime>
<Attr Name="_DisplaySize" Value="10"/>
</DesignTime>
<validation:ExistsValidationBean
Name="RoleId_Rule_1"
ResId="CS.model.BC.EO.UserRolesEO.RoleId_Rule_1"
OperandType="EO"
AssocName="CS.model.BC.ASS.UsersRolesFk2ASS"/>
</Attribute>
Interface af : table
<af:table value="#{bindings.UserRoles2.collectionModel}" var="row"
rows="#{bindings.UserRoles2.rangeSize}"
emptyText="#{bindings.UserRoles2.viewable ? 'No data to display.' : 'Access Denied.'}"
fetchSize="#{bindings.UserRoles2.rangeSize}"
rowBandingInterval="0"
filterModel="#{bindings.UserRoles2Query.queryDescriptor}"
queryListener="#{bindings.UserRoles2Query.processQuery}"
filterVisible="true" varStatus="vs"
selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.UserRoles2.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.UserRoles2.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"
rowSelection="single" id="t1" columnSelection="none"
columnStretching="column:c3">
<af:column sortProperty="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleId.name}"
filterable="true" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleId.label}"
id="c2">
<af:inputListOfValues id="roleIdId"
popupTitle="Search and Select: #{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleId.label}"
value="#{row.bindings.RoleId.inputValue}"
model="#{row.bindings.RoleId.listOfValuesModel}"
required="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleId.mandatory}"
columns="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleId.displayWidth}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleId.tooltip}"
autoSubmit="true" editMode="select">
<f:validator binding="#{row.bindings.RoleId.validator}"/>
</af:inputListOfValues>
</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleName.name}"
sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.RoleName.label}"
id="c3">
<af:outputFormatted value="#{row.bindings.RoleName.inputValue}"
id="of7" partialTriggers="roleIdId"/>
</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.Active.name}"
filterable="true" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.UserRoles2.hints.Active.label}"
id="c4">
<af:outputFormatted value="#{row.bindings.Active.inputValue}"
id="of8" partialTriggers="roleIdId"/>
</af:column>
</af:table>
Edited by: user8854969 on Oct 7, 2012 1:34 PM
Edited by: user8854969 on Oct 7, 2012 2:16 PM

I believe there is a little confusion here. The error I am encountering has to do with a unique constraint violation and not a foreign key constraint. If I have the data:
PK FK sequence
1 5 1
2 5 2
3 5 3
with a unique constraint on (FK, sequence) and want to change it to:
PK FK sequence
1 5 1
4 5 2 --insert
2 5 3 --update on sequence
3 5 4 --update on sequence
I am currently getting a unique constraint violation because the insert is issued before the updates, and the updates alone cause problems because they are issued out of order (i.e. if I do the shifting operation without the insertion of a new record).

Unique constraint error but key when inserting unique keys!

Hi,
I am tring to update an existing database with some older data, I am getting an error which complains about a unique constraint being violated although there is no voilation evident after testing.
I am puzzled by this and was wondering if someone could give me any extra info on another possible cause.
I googled but found that this error is caused by duplicating primary keys which I am not doing though I still get this error.
I run this query then the update and get the output below:
desc test_sales;
desc sales_order;
SELECT order_id FROM sales_order WHERE order_id IN (SELECT order_id FROM test_Sales);
INSERT INTO sales_order
(order_id,order_date,customer_id, ship_date,total)
SELECT
      order_id,
      order_date,
      cust_id,
      ship_date,
      total
FROM
      test_sales;
desc test_sales;
Name                           Null     Type
------------------------------ -------- CUST_ID                                 NUMBER(6)
OLD_SYSTEM_ID                           VARCHAR2(25)
DESCRIPTION                             VARCHAR2(35)
ORDER_DATE                              DATE
SHIP_DATE                               DATE
QUANTITY                                NUMBER
ORDER_ID                       NOT NULL NUMBER(4)
ITEM_ID                        NOT NULL NUMBER(4)
SITE_COUNT                              NUMBER(2)
TOTAL                                   NUMBER(8,2)
PRODUCT_CODE                            NUMBER(6)
LIST_PRICE                              NUMBER(8,2)
12 rows selected
desc sales_order;
Name                           Null     Type
------------------------------ -------- ORDER_ID                       NOT NULL NUMBER(4)
ORDER_DATE                              DATE
CUSTOMER_ID                             NUMBER(6)
SHIP_DATE                               DATE
TOTAL                                   NUMBER(8,2)
5 rows selected
ORDER_ID
0 rows selected
Error starting at line 7 in command:
INSERT INTO sales_order
(order_id,order_date,customer_id, ship_date,total)
SELECT
      order_id,
      order_date,
      cust_id,
      ship_date,
      total
FROM
      test_sales
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
ORA-06512: at line 8
ORA-00001: unique constraint (MICHAELKELLY.SYS_C00210356) violatedMessage was edited by:
Mike1981
Message was edited by:
Mike1981

ORA-00001: unique constraint (MICHAELKELLY.SYS_C00210356) violated
=> check dba_cons_columns to see what the constraint actually exists off

PK with TIMESTAMP causes insert unique constraint error at DST switch

Hi,
I have a test that inserts rows in a table that has a TIMESTAMP in its PK.
When inserting rows that cross over the November DST change, it tries to insert these dates:
--- Sun Nov 02 02:00:00 EST 2008
--- Sun Nov 02 01:00:00 EST 2008
--- Sun Nov 02 01:00:00 EDT 2008
This is the output of 3 different UTC dates. We can see that there are 2 x 1am, but they differ in their DST. They are really 3 different UTC dates.
But I get this error:
--- Expected error: ORA-00001: unique constraint (DDLTEST1.SYS_C00142622) violated
But I can get around that error and can insert these same dates if I set my JVM to UTC. The inserts work so I suspect this to be a JDBC issue.
I am using the Oracle Thin driver in a spring app:
<property name="driverClassName" value="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" />
<property name="url" value="jdbc:oracle:thin:@localhost:db" />
I can post the sample code but wonder if there is an obvious answer to this.
Note that MySql had the same problem. I fixed it by specifying the UTC timezone in the connection string, like this:
jdbc:mysql://[host]/[db]?useLegacyDatetimeCode=false&useTimezone=true&sessionVariables=time_zone='UTC'
Any idea how to get around that problem without setting JVM to UTC ?
Claude
Edited by: user2678899 on 10 juin 2009 10:09
I removed #2 work around which was wrong
Edited by: user2678899 on 10 juin 2009 10:23

Timur Akhmadeev wrote:
Hi,
I suspect this to be a JDBC issue.Nope, this is your schema design gap. It breaks the main principle of PK: to uniquely identify a row in a table always. Your PK doesn't satisfy it, since it depends on client's settings.Why is setting the JVM to UTC working ? This is the part that confuses me.
I create the 3 dates in Eastern time, then change the JVM default to UTC: the 3 inserts work.
I create the 3 dates in Eastern time, then leave the JVM to Eastern time , the 3rd insert gets the unique constraint error.
To me, the PK principle is not broken: these are 3 different UTC dates.

Insert result of query into a table with unique constraint

Hi,
I have a query result that I would like to store in a table. The target table has a unique constraint. In MySQL you can do
insert IGNORE into myResultTable <...select statement...>
The IGNORE clause means if inserting a row would violate a unique or primary key constraint, do not insert the row, but continue inserting the rest of the query. Leaving the IGNORE clause out would cause the insert to fail and an error to return.
I would like to do this in oracle... that is insert the results of a query that are not already in the target table. What is the best way to do this? One way is use a procedural language and loop through the first query, checking to see if each row is a duplicate before inserting it. I would think this would be slow if there are lots of records. Other options...
insert into myTargetTable
select value from mySourceTable where ... and not exists (select 'x' from myTargetTable where value = mySourceTable.value)
insert into myTargetTable
select mySourceTable.value
from myTargetTable RIGHT JOIN mySourceTable
ON myTargetTable.value = mySourceTable.value
where ...
and myTargetTable.value IS NULL
any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Simon

Try doing a MINUS instead of not exists., ie Source MINUS Target.
Disabling the constraint will not help you since this will allow the duplicate rows to be inserted into the table. I don't think you want this.
--kalpana

ASCP erroring out with ORA-00001: unique constraint (MSC.MSC_SETUP_TRANSITI

Here is log
=====================================================
18-AUG 11:06:25 : ======================================== 18-AUG
11:06:25 : Error in PROCEDURE=LOAD_SETUP_TRANSITION, TABLE=MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS 18-AUG 11:06:27 : COLUMN=ORGANIZATION_CODE,
VALUE=TST:M1 18-AUG 11:06:27 : COLUMN=RESOURCE_ID, VALUE=14 18-AUG
11:06:27 : COLUMN=FROM_SETUP_ID, VALUE=1 18-AUG 11:06:27 :
COLUMN=TO_SETUP_ID, VALUE=2 18-AUG 11:06:27 : ORA-00001: unique constraint (MSC.MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS_U1) violated 18-AUG 11:06:27 :
======================================== 18-AUG 11:06:27 : Error in PROCEDURE=LOAD_SETUP_TRANSITION, TABLE=MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS 18-AUG
11:06:27 : COLUMN=ORGANIZATION_CODE, VALUE=TST:M1 18-AUG 11:06:27 :
COLUMN=RESOURCE_ID, VALUE=14 18-AUG 11:06:27 : COLUMN=FROM_SETUP_ID,
VALUE=2 18-AUG 11:06:28 : COLUMN=TO_SETUP_ID, VALUE=1 18-AUG 11:06:28 :
ORA-00001: unique constraint (MSC.MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS_U1) violated 18-AUG 11:06:28 : ======================================== 18-AUG
11:06:28 : Error in PROCEDURE=LOAD_SETUP_TRANSITION, TABLE=MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS 18-AUG 11:06:28 : COLUMN=ORGANIZATION_CODE,
VALUE=TST:M1 18-AUG 11:06:28 : COLUMN=RESOURCE_ID, VALUE=16 18-AUG
11:06:28 : COLUMN=FROM_SETUP_ID, VALUE=1 18-AUG 11:06:28 :
COLUMN=TO_SETUP_ID, VALUE=2 18-AUG 11:06:28 : ORA-00001: unique constraint (MSC.MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS_U1) violated 18-AUG 11:06:28 :
======================================== 18-AUG 11:06:28 : Error in PROCEDURE=LOAD_SETUP_TRANSITION, TABLE=MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS 18-AUG
11:06:28 : COLUMN=ORGANIZATION_CODE, VALUE=TST:M1 18-AUG 11:06:28 :
COLUMN=RESOURCE_ID, VALUE=16 18-AUG 11:06:28 : COLUMN=FROM_SETUP_ID,
VALUE=2 18-AUG 11:06:28 : COLUMN=TO_SETUP_ID, VALUE=1 18-AUG 11:06:28 :
ORA-00001: unique constraint (MSC.MSC_SETUP_TRANSITIONS_U1) violated 18-AUG 11:06:28 : Total resource transition = 167 18-AUG 11:06:28 : .1 minutes elapsed.
18-AUG 11:06:30 : Procedure MSC_CL_RPO_ODS_LOAD.LOAD_IRO_DEMAND;
started. 18-AUG 11:06:31 : <<LOAD_IRO_DEMAND>> 18-AUG 11:06:31 :
<<CURSOR>>INSERT /*+ APPEND */ INTO DEMANDS_TST( PLAN_ID, DEMAND_ID, DISPOSITION_ID, INVENTORY_ITEM_ID, ORGANIZATION_ID, USING_ASSEMBLY_ITEM_ID, USING_ASSEMBLY_DEMAND_DATE, USING_REQUIREMENT_QUANTITY, QUANTITY_PER_ASSEMBLY, ISSUED_QUANTITY, ASSEMBLY_DEMAND_COMP_DATE, DEMAND_TYPE, ORIGINATION_TYPE, SOURCE_ORGANIZATION_ID, RESERVATION_ID, OP_SEQ_NUM, DEMAND_CLASS, REPETITIVE_SCHEDULE_ID, SR_INSTANCE_ID, PROJECT_ID, TASK_ID, PLANNING_GROUP, UNIT_NUMBER, ORDER_NUMBER, REPAIR_LINE_ID, WIP_ENTITY_ID, WIP_ENTITY_NAME, WIP_STATUS_CODE, WIP_SUPPLY_TYPE, ASSET_ITEM_ID, ASSET_SERIAL_NUMBER, COMPONENT_SCALING_TYPE, COMPONENT_YIELD_FACTOR,null,null, REFRESH_NUMBER, LAST_UPDATE_DATE, LAST_UPDATED_BY, CREATION_DATE, CREATED_BY)SELECT -1, MSC_DEMANDS_S.nextval, NVL(ms.TRANSACTION_ID,-1) DISPOSITION_ID, t1.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID, msd.ORGANIZATION_ID, t2.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID USING_ASSEMBLY_ITEM_ID, nvl(msd.USING_ASSEMBLY_DEMAND_DATE,ms.new_schedule_date),
msd.USING_REQUIREMENT_QUANTITY, msd.QUANTITY_PER_ASSEMBLY, msd.QUANTITY_ISSUED, msd.ASSEMBLY_DEMAND_COMP_DATE, msd.DEMAND_TYPE, msd.ORIGINATION_TYPE, msd.SOURCE_ORGANIZATION_ID, msd.RESERVATION_ID, msd.OPERATION_SEQ_NUM, msd.DEMAND_CLASS, msd.REPETITIVE_SCHEDULE_ID, msd.SR_INSTANCE_ID, msd.PROJECT_ID, msd.TASK_ID, msd.PLANNING_GROUP, msd.END_ITEM_UNIT_NUMBER,
REPLACE(REPLACE(substr(msd.ORDER_NUMBER,1,62),:v_chr10),:v_chr13)
ORDER_NUMBER, REPAIR_LINE_ID , msd.WIP_ENTITY_ID, msd.WIP_ENTITY_NAME, msd.WIP_STATUS_CODE, msd.WIP_SUPPLY_TYPE, t3.inventory_item_id ASSET_ITEM_ID, msd.ASSET_SERIAL_NUMBER, msd.COMPONENT_SCALING_TYPE, msd.COMPONENT_YIELD_FACTOR,null,null, :v_last_collection_id, :v_current_date, :v_current_user, :v_current_date, :v_current_user FROM MSC_ITEM_ID_LID t1, MSC_ITEM_ID_LID t2, MSC_ITEM_ID_LID t3,SUPPLIES_TST ms, MSC_ST_DEMANDS msd WHERE msd.SR_INSTANCE_ID= 21 AND msd.ORIGINATION_TYPE = 77 AND msd.DELETED_FLAG= 2 AND t1.SR_INVENTORY_ITEM_ID= msd.inventory_item_id AND t1.sr_instance_id= msd.SR_INSTANCE_ID AND t2.SR_INVENTORY_ITEM_ID= msd.using_assembly_item_id AND t2.sr_instance_id= msd.SR_INSTANCE_ID AND t3.SR_INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)= msd.ASSET_ITEM_ID AND t3.sr_instance_id (+) = msd.SR_INSTANCE_ID AND ms.sr_instance_id= msd.SR_INSTANCE_ID AND ms.ORGANIZATION_ID= msd.ORGANIZATION_ID AND ms.DISPOSITION_ID= msd.repair_line_id AND ms.plan_id=-1 AND ms.ORDER_TYPE= 75 18-AUG
11:06:31 : ORA-01747: invalid user.table.column, table.column, or column specification 18-AUG 11:06:31 : .1 minutes elapsed.
===================================================
any help is appreciated. Just got this Bug 8661320, ref with no help. Its on R12 12.1.1

Sundeep,
No similar errors are reported in Metalink, so I would suggest you log a SR.
Regards,
Hussein

HT201304 I want to buy new level from candy crush, but unfortunately apple required to accept terms and condition first before I can buy. But once I click yes no more option to click I agree with the condition. what should I do?

I want to buy new level from candy crush, but unfortunately apple required to accept terms and condition first before I can buy. But once I click yes no more option to click I agree with the condition. what should I do?

Perform a Reset... Try again...
Reset ( No Data will be Lost )
Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears. Release the Buttons.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1430

Create two logical columns with same LTS mapping but diff filter conditions

Hi,
Problem:
How to create two logical columns within same logical table mapped to same physical column but different filter conditions?
I have a scenario where in,
Physical layer columns
     - table1.employee
     - table1.emp_city
I need a columns in logical layer:
Logical layer - lt1.count_emp_delhi (counts distinct employees whose city_name = 'Delhi')
          lt1.count_emp_mumbai(counts distinct employees whose city_name = 'Mumbai')
My approach:
For Delhi column
1. Create a logical column lt1.count_emp_delhi mapped to the physical column table1.employee
2. Aggregate using countdistinct in aggregate tab.
3. Edit the mapping condition
     3.1. Use the where clause and set table1.emp_city='Delhi'.
For Mumbai column.
Followed the same approach as above but in 3.1 if I change the condition to 'Mumbai', even the delhi column is populated with mumbai count which is ERRONEOUS
Could some one please help?

Hi,
1. Create two alias tables for table1 in Physical Layer. Lets say TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi
2. Create a logical table in BMM layer (D1 Employee Cities )
3. Drag and drop the employee & emp_city columns from both alias tables (TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi ) into your newly created logical table.
4. Now you can see two Logical Table Sources (TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi )
5. Now using Where condition, write the condition on each table
NOTE: Don't write any condition on the Physical table Table1.
Hope it helps you.
Regards,
Kalyan Chukkapalli
http://123obi.com

SIL_GLCOGSFact Failed with Unique Constraint

Hi,
A Task SIL_GLCOGSFact failed with ORA-00001: unique constraint (DW.W_GL_COGS_F_U1) violated
while insert into table W_GL_COGS_F.
There is not any record existing in the fact table. There is no way for such error. So weird.
Please help me out.
Roger
Error in Session log as following:
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute
SQL Stmt : INSERT INTO W_GL_COGS_F(GL_ACCOUNT_WID,BUDGT_ORG_WID,CUSTOMER_WID,CUSTOMER_FIN_PROFL_WID,TERRITORY_WID,SALES_GROUP_ORG_WID,CUSTOMER_CONTACT_WID,CUSTOMER_SOLD_TO_LOC_WID,CUSTOMER_SHIP_TO_LOC_WID,CUSTOMER_BILL_TO_LOC_WID,CUSTOMER_PAYER_LOC_WID,SUPPLIER_WID,SUPPLIER_ACCOUNT_WID,SALES_REP_WID,SERVICE_REP_WID,ACCOUNT_REP_WID,PRODUCT_WID,SALES_PRODUCT_WID,INVENTORY_PRODUCT_WID,SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_WID,COMPANY_LOC_WID,PLANT_LOC_WID,SALES_OFC_LOC_WID,LEDGER_WID,COMPANY_ORG_WID,BUSN_AREA_ORG_WID,CTRL_AREA_ORG_WID,FIN_AREA_ORG_WID,SALES_ORG_WID,PURCH_ORG_WID,ISSUE_ORG_WID,DOC_TYPE_WID,CLRNG_DOC_TYPE_WID,POSTING_TYPE_WID,CLR_POST_TYPE_WID,COST_CENTER_WID,PROFIT_CENTER_WID,BANK_WID,PAY_TERMS_WID,TRANSACTION_DT_WID,TRANSACTION_TM_WID,CONVERSION_DT_WID,ORDERED_ON_DT_WID,INVOICED_ON_DT_WID,DELIVERED_ON_DT_WID,CUSTOMER_REQUEST_DT_WID,GOODS_ISSUE_DT_WID,STOCK_XFER_DT_WID,CLEARING_DOC_DT_WID,BASELINE_DT_WID,PLANNING_DT_WID,ACCOUNT_DOC_ID,COGS_DOC_AMT,COGS_LOC_AMT,XACT_QTY,UOM_CODE,DB_CR_IND,ACCT_DOC_NUM,ACCT_DOC_ITEM,ACCT_DOC_SUB_ITEM,CLEARING_DOC_NUM,CLEARING_DOC_ITEM,SALES_ORDER_NUM,SALES_ORDER_ITEM,SALES_SCH_LINE,INVOICE_NUM,INVOICE_ITEM,DELIVERY_DOC_NUM,DELIVERY_DOC_ITEM,GI_DOC_NUM,GI_DOC_ITEM,STO_DOC_NUM,STO_DOC_ITEM,DOC_HEADER_TEXT,LINE_ITEM_TEXT,ALLOCATION_NUM,FED_BALANCE_ID,BALANCE_ID,DOC_STATUS_WID,POSTED_ON_DT_WID,POSTED_ON_TM_WID,CLEARED_ON_DT_WID,GL_RECONCILED_ON_DT,DOC_CURR_CODE,LOC_CURR_CODE,LOC_EXCHANGE_RATE,GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE,GLOBAL2_EXCHANGE_RATE,GLOBAL3_EXCHANGE_RATE,CREATED_BY_WID,CHANGED_BY_WID,CREATED_ON_DT,CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX1_CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX2_CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX3_CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX4_CHANGED_ON_DT,DELETE_FLG,W_INSERT_DT,W_UPDATE_DT,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID,ETL_PROC_WID,INTEGRATION_ID,TENANT_ID,X_CUSTOM,GL_RECONCILED_ON_PROC_WID) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute Multiple
SQL Stmt : INSERT INTO W_GL_COGS_F(GL_ACCOUNT_WID,BUDGT_ORG_WID,CUSTOMER_WID,CUSTOMER_FIN_PROFL_WID,TERRITORY_WID,SALES_GROUP_ORG_WID,CUSTOMER_CONTACT_WID,CUSTOMER_SOLD_TO_LOC_WID,CUSTOMER_SHIP_TO_LOC_WID,CUSTOMER_BILL_TO_LOC_WID,CUSTOMER_PAYER_LOC_WID,SUPPLIER_WID,SUPPLIER_ACCOUNT_WID,SALES_REP_WID,SERVICE_REP_WID,ACCOUNT_REP_WID,PRODUCT_WID,SALES_PRODUCT_WID,INVENTORY_PRODUCT_WID,SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_WID,COMPANY_LOC_WID,PLANT_LOC_WID,SALES_OFC_LOC_WID,LEDGER_WID,COMPANY_ORG_WID,BUSN_AREA_ORG_WID,CTRL_AREA_ORG_WID,FIN_AREA_ORG_WID,SALES_ORG_WID,PURCH_ORG_WID,ISSUE_ORG_WID,DOC_TYPE_WID,CLRNG_DOC_TYPE_WID,POSTING_TYPE_WID,CLR_POST_TYPE_WID,COST_CENTER_WID,PROFIT_CENTER_WID,BANK_WID,PAY_TERMS_WID,TRANSACTION_DT_WID,TRANSACTION_TM_WID,CONVERSION_DT_WID,ORDERED_ON_DT_WID,INVOICED_ON_DT_WID,DELIVERED_ON_DT_WID,CUSTOMER_REQUEST_DT_WID,GOODS_ISSUE_DT_WID,STOCK_XFER_DT_WID,CLEARING_DOC_DT_WID,BASELINE_DT_WID,PLANNING_DT_WID,ACCOUNT_DOC_ID,COGS_DOC_AMT,COGS_LOC_AMT,XACT_QTY,UOM_CODE,DB_CR_IND,ACCT_DOC_NUM,ACCT_DOC_ITEM,ACCT_DOC_SUB_ITEM,CLEARING_DOC_NUM,CLEARING_DOC_ITEM,SALES_ORDER_NUM,SALES_ORDER_ITEM,SALES_SCH_LINE,INVOICE_NUM,INVOICE_ITEM,DELIVERY_DOC_NUM,DELIVERY_DOC_ITEM,GI_DOC_NUM,GI_DOC_ITEM,STO_DOC_NUM,STO_DOC_ITEM,DOC_HEADER_TEXT,LINE_ITEM_TEXT,ALLOCATION_NUM,FED_BALANCE_ID,BALANCE_ID,DOC_STATUS_WID,POSTED_ON_DT_WID,POSTED_ON_TM_WID,CLEARED_ON_DT_WID,GL_RECONCILED_ON_DT,DOC_CURR_CODE,LOC_CURR_CODE,LOC_EXCHANGE_RATE,GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE,GLOBAL2_EXCHANGE_RATE,GLOBAL3_EXCHANGE_RATE,CREATED_BY_WID,CHANGED_BY_WID,CREATED_ON_DT,CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX1_CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX2_CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX3_CHANGED_ON_DT,AUX4_CHANGED_ON_DT,DELETE_FLG,W_INSERT_DT,W_UPDATE_DT,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID,ETL_PROC_WID,INTEGRATION_ID,TENANT_ID,X_CUSTOM,GL_RECONCILED_ON_PROC_WID) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Tue Nov 17 18:50:31 2009]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8425 ERROR: Writer execution failed.
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Tue Nov 17 18:50:31 2009]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8114
Row # [1] in bad file
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1053 : Rowdata: ( RowType=0(insert) Src Rowid=42 Targ Rowid=42
GL_ACCOUNT_WID (GL_ACCOUNT_WID:Double:): "271134.0000000000"
BUDGT_ORG_WID (BUDGT_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_WID (CUSTOMER_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_FIN_PROFL_WID (CUSTOMER_FIN_PROFL_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
TERRITORY_WID (TERRITORY_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
SALES_GROUP_ORG_WID (SALES_GROUP_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_CONTACT_WID (CUSTOMER_CONTACT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_SOLD_TO_LOC_WID (CUSTOMER_SOLD_TO_LOC_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_SHIP_TO_LOC_WID (CUSTOMER_SHIP_TO_LOC_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_BILL_TO_LOC_WID (CUSTOMER_BILL_TO_LOC_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_PAYER_LOC_WID (CUSTOMER_PAYER_LOC_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
SUPPLIER_WID (SUPPLIER_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
SUPPLIER_ACCOUNT_WID (SUPPLIER_ACCOUNT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
SALES_REP_WID (SALES_REP_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
SERVICE_REP_WID (SERVICE_REP_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
ACCOUNT_REP_WID (ACCOUNT_REP_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
PRODUCT_WID (PRODUCT_WID:Double:): "107667.0000000000"
SALES_PRODUCT_WID (SALES_PRODUCT_WID:Double:): "5093039.000000000"
INVENTORY_PRODUCT_WID (INVENTORY_PRODUCT_WID:Double:): "4376743.000000000"
SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_WID (SUPPLIER_PRODUCT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
COMPANY_LOC_WID (COMPANY_LOC_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
PLANT_LOC_WID (PLANT_LOC_WID:Double:): "2147.000000000000"
SALES_OFC_LOC_WID (SALES_OFC_LOC_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
LEDGER_WID (LEDGER_WID:Double:): "2030.000000000000"
COMPANY_ORG_WID (COMPANY_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
BUSN_AREA_ORG_WID (BUSN_AREA_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CTRL_AREA_ORG_WID (CTRL_AREA_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
FIN_AREA_ORG_WID (FIN_AREA_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
SALES_ORG_WID (SALES_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
PURCH_ORG_WID (PURCH_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
ISSUE_ORG_WID (ISSUE_ORG_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
DOC_TYPE_WID (DOC_TYPE_WID:Double:): "6111.000000000000"
CLRNG_DOC_TYPE_WID (CLRNG_DOC_TYPE_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
POSTING_TYPE_WID (POSTING_TYPE_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CLR_POST_TYPE_WID (CLR_POST_TYPE_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
COST_CENTER_WID (COST_CENTER_WID:Double:): "3317.000000000000"
PROFIT_CENTER_WID (PROFIT_CENTER_WID:Double:): "2025.000000000000"
BANK_WID (BANK_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
PAY_TERMS_WID (PAY_TERMS_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
TRANSACTION_DT_WID (TRANSACTION_DT_WID:Double:): "20090211.00000000"
TRANSACTION_TM_WID (TRANSACTION_TM_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CONVERSION_DT_WID (CONVERSION_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
ORDERED_ON_DT_WID (ORDERED_ON_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
INVOICED_ON_DT_WID (INVOICED_ON_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
DELIVERED_ON_DT_WID (DELIVERED_ON_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CUSTOMER_REQUEST_DT_WID (CUSTOMER_REQUEST_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
GOODS_ISSUE_DT_WID (GOODS_ISSUE_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
STOCK_XFER_DT_WID (STOCK_XFER_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
CLEARING_DOC_DT_WID (CLEARING_DOC_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
BASELINE_DT_WID (BASELINE_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
PLANNING_DT_WID (PLANNING_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
ACCOUNT_DOC_ID (ACCOUNT_DOC_ID:UniChar.80:): "2899322~12389~Feb-09~230"
COGS_DOC_AMT (COGS_DOC_AMT:Double:): "30.00000000000000"
COGS_LOC_AMT (COGS_LOC_AMT:Double:): "30.00000000000000"
XACT_QTY (XACT_QTY:Double:): "1.000000000000000"
UOM_CODE (UOM_CODE:UniChar.50:): ""
DB_CR_IND (DB_CR_IND:UniChar.30:): "DEBIT"
ACCT_DOC_NUM (ACCT_DOC_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
ACCT_DOC_ITEM (ACCT_DOC_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
ACCT_DOC_SUB_ITEM (ACCT_DOC_SUB_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
CLEARING_DOC_NUM (CLEARING_DOC_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
CLEARING_DOC_ITEM (CLEARING_DOC_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
SALES_ORDER_NUM (SALES_ORDER_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
SALES_ORDER_ITEM (SALES_ORDER_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
SALES_SCH_LINE (SALES_SCH_LINE:Double:): "(NULL)"
INVOICE_NUM (INVOICE_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
INVOICE_ITEM (INVOICE_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
DELIVERY_DOC_NUM (DELIVERY_DOC_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
DELIVERY_DOC_ITEM (DELIVERY_DOC_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
GI_DOC_NUM (GI_DOC_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
GI_DOC_ITEM (GI_DOC_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
STO_DOC_NUM (STO_DOC_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
STO_DOC_ITEM (STO_DOC_ITEM:Double:): "(NULL)"
DOC_HEADER_TEXT (DOC_HEADER_TEXT:UniChar.255:): "(NULL)"
LINE_ITEM_TEXT (LINE_ITEM_TEXT:UniChar.255:): "(NULL)"
ALLOCATION_NUM (ALLOCATION_NUM:UniChar.30:): "(NULL)"
FED_BALANCE_ID (FED_BALANCE_ID:UniChar.320:): "12389~10004~BUDGET~~10004~~"
BALANCE_ID (BALANCE_ID:UniChar.320:): "10004~12389~"
DOC_STATUS_WID (DOC_STATUS_WID:Double:): "102006.0000000000"
POSTED_ON_DT_WID (POSTED_ON_DT_WID:Double:): "20090211.00000000"
POSTED_ON_TM_WID (POSTED_ON_TM_WID:Double:): "20090211.00000000"
CLEARED_ON_DT_WID (CLEARED_ON_DT_WID:Double:): "0.00000000000000"
GL_RECONCILED_ON_DT (GL_RECONCILED_ON_DT:Date:): "(NULL)"
DOC_CURR_CODE (DOC_CURR_CODE:UniChar.30:): "USD"
LOC_CURR_CODE (LOC_CURR_CODE:UniChar.30:): "USD"
LOC_EXCHANGE_RATE (LOC_EXCHANGE_RATE:Double:): "1.000000000000000"
GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE (GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE:Double:): "1.000000000000000"
GLOBAL2_EXCHANGE_RATE (GLOBAL2_EXCHANGE_RATE:Double:): "33.96700000000000"
GLOBAL3_EXCHANGE_RATE (GLOBAL3_EXCHANGE_RATE:Double:): "1.000000000000000"
CREATED_BY_WID (CREATED_BY_WID:Double:): "11254.00000000000"
CHANGED_BY_WID (CHANGED_BY_WID:Double:): "11254.00000000000"
CREATED_ON_DT (CREATED_ON_DT:Date:): "02/11/2009 14:56:23"
CHANGED_ON_DT (CHANGED_ON_DT:Date:): "(NULL)"
AUX1_CHANGED_ON_DT (AUX1_CHANGED_ON_DT:Date:): "02/11/2009 14:56:23"
AUX2_CHANGED_ON_DT (AUX2_CHANGED_ON_DT:Date:): "(NULL)"
AUX3_CHANGED_ON_DT (AUX3_CHANGED_ON_DT:Date:): "(NULL)"
AUX4_CHANGED_ON_DT (AUX4_CHANGED_ON_DT:Date:): "(NULL)"
DELETE_FLG (DELETE_FLG:UniChar.1:): "N"
W_INSERT_DT (W_INSERT_DT:Date:): "11/17/2009 18:39:40"
W_UPDATE_DT (W_UPDATE_DT:Date:): "11/17/2009 18:39:40"
DATASOURCE_NUM_ID (DATASOURCE_NUM_ID:Double:): "41.00000000000000"
ETL_PROC_WID (ETL_PROC_WID:Double:): "16.00000000000000"
INTEGRATION_ID (INTEGRATION_ID:UniChar.80:): "46214900~12389~2899322~Feb-09~230"
TENANT_ID (TENANT_ID:UniChar.80:): "DEFAULT"
X_CUSTOM (X_CUSTOM:UniChar.10:): "(NULL)"
GL_RECONCILED_ON_PROC_WID (GL_RECONCILED_ON_PROC_WID:Double:): "(NULL)"
)

ETL will do a commit for every 10k records i believe. Might be when it is trying to insert the first 10k records it is having the duplicates. So check in the staging table whether that unique column combination is having any duplicates.

Help with unique constraint ERROR!!!

This error occurs after invoking a Stored Procedure program. When it tries to insert, the PK table goes beserk:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (HASUNI.THA_OTHER_ACTIVITY_PK) violated
ORA-06512: at "HASUNI.POPULATE_GDW_ACTIVITY", line 203
ORA-06512: at "HASUNI.GDW_MASTER", line 21
ORA-06512: at line 9
I tried to clear the PK table to get past the unique constraint error, but I can't seem to delete contents.
PLEASE HELP!!!!

The other queries are erroring out. It doesn't like the HASUNI.THA_OTHER_ACTIVITY_PK. It says this is an undefined table.
Insert Statement:
INSERT INTO HASUNI.THA_OTHER_ACTIVITY <-- line 203
SELECT
viewActivity.GROUPID,
SUBSTR(viewActivity.MEMBERID,11,9)||SUBSTR(viewActivity.MEMBERID,21,9),
viewActivity.ACTIVITYSEQUENCE,
val_first_day,
TO_DATE('31DEC9999'),
viewActivity.PRODUCTID,
viewActivity.PRODPLANTYPE,
SUBSTR(viewActivity.MEMBERID,11,9),
SUBSTR(viewActivity.MEMBERID,21,9),
viewActivity.CLASSVAL,
viewActivity.PCC,
viewActivity.BRANCH,
viewActivity.ARC,
viewActivity.LOCATION,
viewActivity.MEMBERID,
viewActivity.DOB,
viewActivity.GENDER,
viewActivity.MEMBERSTATUS,
viewActivity.CHPNID,
viewActivity.SSN,
NULL,
NULL,
SUBSTR(viewActivity.ZIPCODE,1,5),
SUBSTR(viewActivity.ZIPCODE,7,4),
viewActivity.ST,
viewActivity.SOURCESYSTEMID,
viewActivity.SOURCE,
viewActivity.INITIATEDBY,
viewActivity.OUTCOMES,
viewActivity.OUTCOMESDATE,
viewActivity.INITACTDATE,
viewActivity.INITACTTAKEN,
viewActivity.INITACTTAKENDATE,
viewActivity.INITUSERID,
viewActivity.LASTMODUSRID,
viewActivity.LASTMODDATE,
'HAS',
val_last_day,
NULL
FROM
HASUNI.VW_GDW_ACTIVITY viewActivity,
HASUNI.HA_OUTREACH outreach
WHERE
viewActivity.MEMBERID IN (SELECT viewActivity.MEMBERID FROM HASUNI.VW_GDW_ACTIVITY viewActivity)
AND outreach.MMBR_ID = viewActivity.MEMBERID
AND viewActivity.INITACTTAKEN = 'OTHER'
AND (TRUNC(viewActivity.INITACTDATE) BETWEEN val_first_day AND val_last_day
OR (TRUNC(viewActivity.INITACTDATE) < val_first_day
AND TRUNC(viewActivity.LASTMODDATE) BETWEEN val_first_day AND val_last_day));

UNIQUE constraint but with a condition?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for