Update more then one records in join

How to update more then one records in join query.
means each reocrds have different value.
Thanks

Can you give an example to illustrate your question?

Similar Messages

Insert more then one record on a Form in a Data Block

Hi,
How can I Insert more then one record in the DataBlock of a Form in a WHEN_BUTTON_PRESSED trigger. In the Trigger I have given "commit" but it just saves the record once regardlessly how many times you press the button.
Thanks in advance
Khawar

Hi,
You said
"**In the Trigger I have given (commit) but it just saves the record once regardlessly how many times you press the button.**"
I think u want to batch mode insertion if m not wrong?
1- Use Insert statment instead of commit and then next record.
Begin
Insert into <table> values (:Blk.Val1,:Blk.Val2,:Blk.Val3,:Blk.Val4);
Create_record;
End;
2-Use another object say button for commit record.
Acknowledege me
Best regards
Khurram Siddiqui

Can i update more then one column using select query.

Dear All,
Can i update more then one column of target table A from source table B. Like
Update table A set A.A1 = (Select B.B1 from B where A.A3 = B.B3).
Above stmt. I am updating only one column. But I want to update more then one column A.A1 and A.A2
Plz give me the possible ways.
Thanks,
Vikas

Yes you can do. Try the below Query
Update A set (A.A1,A.A2) = (Select B.B1,B.B2 from B where A.A3 = B.B3)

Updating more then one table

Is it possible to update more then one table (just out of curiousity)?
Something like (I know the following doesn't actually work but that's the basic logic):
UPDATE ps_vchr_hdr_stg a, ps_vchr_line_stg b
SET a.voucher_style = 'ADJ', b.po_id = ' '
WHERE a.key1 = b.key1
AND a.key2= b.key2
and a.gross_amt < 0

Hi, I don't think it is possible:
UPDATE {table_reference | [THE] (subquery1)} [alias]
SET
{column_name = {sql_expression | (subquery2)}
| (column_name [, column_name]...) = (subquery3)}
[, {column_name = {sql_expression | (subquery2)}
| (column_name [, column_name]...) = (subquery3)}]...
[WHERE {search_condition | CURRENT_OF cursor_name}] [RETURNING]
[row_expression [, row_expression]... INTO
{variable_name | :host_variable_name}
[, {variable_name | :host_variable_name}]...];If you need to perform 2 or more operations put it into procedure or function as separate statements.
Regards,
Tomas

How to retrieve more then one record from database

I am doing a SELECT FROM WHERE SQL statement on a database which returns more then one record. I want to retrieve certain column values from the selected records. How do I do that? If only one record is returned, I know I can do a data operation with operation set to 'Get-Retrieve Values from Record' and Record to operate on set to 'Current-Use current record'. I need to find out how to configure to data operation window in the case more then one record is returned by the preceding SQL statement. Depending on the number of records returned, I can dynamically create array variables to store the 'to be retrieved' column values, just dont know how to retrieve them.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Anuj

I apologize for not being clear in explaining my problem, perhaps I should have posted an example. Anyways, I was able to figure out the solution. I was doing an 'Open SQL' statement which was selecting multiple records (rows) from a table in the dB. I was storing the number of records returned in a local variable. Then, I wanted to retrieve certain columns of all the selected rows (records). In the "Data operation", I was choosing the 'Record to operate on' as 'Current-Use Current Record'. Changing this field to 'Next-Fetch next record' fixed the problem. I then retrieved the values of those columns into a dynamically created array variable whose dimensions came from the local variable which stored the number of records returned in the SELECT SQL statement.
Thanks
Anuj

Is it possible to retrieve report for more then one record at Bi Pub

is it possible to retrieve report for more then one record at a time using BI Publisher on siebel Application

Hi Sudhir,
We have tried this.
I think currently you can query for records you want on UI and run report , then you can see the result set of query in report.
But i think in future releases of BIP the feature to run a report for selected & Multiple Selected records will be provided.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Common diemsions and more then one fact table join problem

Hi,
I have 5 common dimension and 3 fact table which in the same subject area. When I want to display results from more then one fact table sending database then query more then one and I think BI server join this two different result on OBI server. But I think if obi server sending database query for exp. WITH SAWITH0 .... the results get effective.
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea000f:----2009/03/14 10:12:59
-------------------- SQL Request:
SET VARIABLE QUERY_SRC_CD='Report';SELECT "- Common Dimensions"."Year Month" saw_0, "- Subs. Tariff"."Subscriber Current Tariff Type" saw_1, "- Common Measures".Arpu saw_2, "- Common Measures"."Gross Margin" saw_3, "- Call Out"."Callout Dur" saw_4, "- Case".Case_Info_Num saw_5 FROM "CUSTOMER PROFILING" WHERE ("- Common Dimensions"."Year Month" = 200901) AND ("- Subs. Tariff"."Subscriber Current Tariff Type" = 'PREPAID') ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea000f:----2009/03/14 10:12:59
-------------------- General Query Info:
Repository: Star, Subject Area: CUSTOMER PROFILING REV, Presentation: CUSTOMER PROFILING
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea000f:----2009/03/14 10:13:00
-------------------- Sending query to database named CENTRAVEA (id: <<471777>>):
select T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID as c1,
T221204.DIM_SUBS_CURRENT_TARIFF_TYPE as c2,
avg(T223490.FACT_CP_ARPU) as c3,
sum(T223490.FACT_CP_GROSS_MARGIN) as c4,
sum(T223490.FACT_CP_CO_DUR) as c5
from
DM.DIM_SUBSCRIBER T221204 /* A_DIM_SUBSCRIBER */ ,
DM.DIM_TIME_MONTH T223282 /* A_DIM_TIME_MONTH */ ,
DM.FACT_CUST_PROFILING_PART3 T223490 /* A_FACT_CUST_PROFILING_PART3 */
where ( T221204.DIM_SUBS_ID = T223490.DIM_SUBS_ID and T221204.DIM_SUBS_CURRENT_TARIFF_TYPE = 'PREPAID' and T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID = T223490.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID and T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID = 200901 and T223490.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID = 200901 )
group by T221204.DIM_SUBS_CURRENT_TARIFF_TYPE, T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID
order by c1, c2
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea000f:----2009/03/14 10:13:00
-------------------- Sending query to database named CENTRAVEA (id: <<471881>>):
select T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID as c1,
T221204.DIM_SUBS_CURRENT_TARIFF_TYPE as c2,
sum(T223294.FACT_CP_CASE_INFO_NO) as c3
from
DM.DIM_SUBSCRIBER T221204 /* A_DIM_SUBSCRIBER */ ,
DM.DIM_TIME_MONTH T223282 /* A_DIM_TIME_MONTH */ ,
DM.FACT_CUST_PROFILING_PART1 T223294 /* A_FACT_CUST_PROFILING_PART1 */
where ( T221204.DIM_SUBS_ID = T223294.DIM_SUBS_ID and T221204.DIM_SUBS_CURRENT_TARIFF_TYPE = 'PREPAID' and T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID = T223294.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID and T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID = 200901 and T223294.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID = 200901 )
group by T221204.DIM_SUBS_CURRENT_TARIFF_TYPE, T223282.DIM_TIME_MONTH_ID
order by c1, c2
I have another subject area and which defined like this subject area contain two dimension and 5 fact table. If I want to display results on this subject area I can see best sql for my database
My problem is why this two different subject areas create different queries. I think following query is the best for database.
Thanks for your help
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea0015:----2009/03/14 10:30:06
-------------------- SQL Request:
SET VARIABLE QUERY_SRC_CD='Report';SELECT "Dim - Segments"."Marketing Segment" saw_0, "Fact - Campaign Response"."Fact Campaign Award Amount" saw_1, "Fact - Customer Interaction"."Issue Response Cost" saw_2 FROM "AVEA ALL" ORDER BY saw_0
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea0015:----2009/03/14 10:30:06
-------------------- General Query Info:
Repository: Star, Subject Area: AVEA ALL, Presentation: AVEA ALL
+++002002:2ea0000:2ea0015:----2009/03/14 10:30:06
-------------------- Sending query to database named AVEA ALL (id: <<474694>>):
WITH
SAWITH0 AS (select sum(T51461.FACT_CMPGN_AWARD_AMOUNT) as c1,
T49384.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_DESC as c2
from
DM.DIM_MARKETING_SEGMENT T49384 /* DIM_BI_MARKETING_SEGMENT */ ,
DM.FACT_CMPGN_RESPONSE T51461 /* FACT_BI_CMPGN_RESPONSE */
where ( T49384.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_ID = T51461.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_ID )
group by T49384.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_DESC),
SAWITH1 AS (select sum(T51503.FACT_CUST_INT_ISSUE_RES_COST) as c1,
T49384.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_DESC as c2
from
DM.DIM_MARKETING_SEGMENT T49384 /* DIM_BI_MARKETING_SEGMENT */ ,
DM.FACT_CUST_INTERACTN T51503 /* FACT_BI_CUST_INTERACTN */
where ( T49384.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_ID = T51503.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_ID )
group by T49384.DIM_MARKETING_SGMNT_DESC)
select distinct case when SAWITH0.c2 is not null then SAWITH0.c2 when SAWITH1.c2 is not null then SAWITH1.c2 end as c1,
SAWITH0.c1 as c2,
SAWITH1.c1 as c3
from
SAWITH0 full outer join SAWITH1 On SAWITH0.c2 = SAWITH1.c2
order by c1

I find solution on Oracle® Business Intelligence Suite Enterprise Edition Release Notes.
If you use a version of Oracle Database 10g Release 2 prior to 10.2.0.3, then you might encounter an issue with a Full Outer Join that causes severe database performance issues and appears to hang the database when the Oracle BI Server sends to the database SQL queries that include WITH clauses.
To work around this issue when using Oracle Database 10g Release 1 or 2, upgrade to Oracle Database 10g Release 2 Patch Set 2 (for 10.2.0.3). For performance reasons, this is the preferred workaround.
To work around this issue without installing Patch Set 2, modify the Database Features table using the Administration Tool. This configuration prevents the Oracle BI Server from sending SQL constructs that expose the issue in an unpatched Oracle Database 10g.
To modify the Database Features table:
In the Administration Tool, open the properties of the Physical Database metadata object.
Navigate to the Features tab.
Ensure the values for the PERF_PREFER_MINIMAL_WITH_USAGE and PERF_PREFER_INTERNAL_STITCH_JOIN entries are selected, that is, set to True.

How to update more than one records at one time

hello guys..
how to update a few records (more than one) with different
IDs at the same time? i tried to make a query like this (see
below), but only one record (more than one data in the same
field)has been updated.
<cfquery name="rec" datasource="DatKoku">
select *
from tbl_pilih
where id_pel = '#form.idpel#'
</cfquery>
<cfquery name="updtrecord" datasource="DatKoku">
update tbl_pilih
set
kptsn = '#form.suk_pil#',
trkh_kptsn =
'#Dateformat(TodayDate,"dd/mm/yy")#|#TimeFormat(Now(),"hh:mm:ss
tt")#'
where id_pel = '#rec.id_pel#'
</cfquery>
<cfquery name="outputrecord" datasource="DatKoku">
select *
from tbl_pilih
where id_pel = '#form.idpel#'
</cfquery>

Take the query,
<cfquery name="rec" datasource="DatKoku">
select *
from tbl_pilih
where id_pel = '#form.idpel#'
</cfquery>
If every row in the table has a distinct id_pel, then what
you ask is actually an impossible question. It will have no answer.
Distinct IDs imply that the resultset will contain
at most one distinct value of id_pel. That means, there can
be at most one row that satisfies the condition,
where id_pel = '#rec.id_pel#' in the update query. That in
turn means the update query can update at most one row at a time.
If, however, the resultset of
rec consists of multiple rows, it will mean that there are
multiple rows in the table that have the same
id_pel . Then, your update query,
updtrecord, should update all the rows that share that value
of id_pel.

OIM reconciliation fails when more then one record in trusted source table

I've create a reconciliation connector against an oracle table with 2 colums:
user_id
email
When I run the connector with only one record exists in the table everything works fine and the user is propogated to the OIM user store. If I add a second record and run the reconciliation again I get:
ERROR,18 Jun 2010 10:15:58,715,[XELLERATE.JMS],The Reconciliation Event with key -1 does not exist
ERROR,18 Jun 2010 10:15:58,716,[XELLERATE.JMS],Processing Reconciliation Message with ID -1 failed.
I'm fairly certain this is something simple.
Does anyone have any thoughts?

How about performing the update IN the database using a stored
procedure?
By using non-database fields on your form to get the
information, you can then call the procedure in the database to
perform the updates. If an error occurs in the procedure you
rollback, if necessary, and send a message or status back to the
form. If it succeeds you might wish to commit and then re-
execute the form's query -- using either the original key values
or the new key values...
null

Can more then one ipod be stored/updated and dowloaded on itunes

can more then one ipod be stored/updated and dowloaded on itunes

yes per How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with ... - Support - Apple

Updation of more then one table at a time

Hi,
Can we Update more than one table at a time with a single query????
and pl Note my server is : SQL Server

pls note that you are in a Oracle forum (FYI Oracle is not a MS product).
Alos I'm sure that there are plenty of MS SQL Server forums on the WWW where you ll find an answer to your question.

How can I restrict more then one user to access the table?

Hi !
I have a problem and two solutions and I am a bit confused as to
which one is the best one and/or can there be any better way of
handling the problem ?
Problem : I have to update a key field of a table when I update
it in the form 5.0 screen. I am basically doing a maintenance of
a table and if a certain field is updated then the change has to
be reflected in two more tables. But the issue is that the field
is a part of the key in those two tables. So all I can think of
is that I need to insert new set or rows for that new value of
the field and delete the old set of records for old values of
the field.
There are two ways of doing it;
1.One option can be to explicitely define two cursors separately
and fetch the values in them one by one and then insert the new
records and then delete the old records in both the tables. This
I feel will be a cumbersome process both in terms of processing
time and the coding.
2.Second option I was thinking can be to create two flat tables
(without keys) and insert the values in them and update the
changed field there and then insert the rows in the respective
tables. Delete the old records in the main tables and delets the
records in these flat tables. This is a bit more faster and
easier to predict and code. This seems to be a better option for
me.
Any comments on these ?
In both the cases I was thinking of making some provision so
that more then one person can't update the table simultaneously.
Since if there are more then one persons doing the processing
then some inconsistency might creep into the whole process.
This is easier to do in the second process as if I check the
data in the flat tables and if there is some data then I can
presume that some one is doing the processing and I can ask the
other person to hold for a while. But in this case how can I
stop more then two people to simultaneously check for the empty
table and start inserting the record ?
I was just thinking of having a sepatare table having only one
field and this will be a key field and as the process begins the
process will insert a fix value say 'Y' in the key field and at
the end of the process the record will be deleted and this way
we can restrict the user to access the process more then one at
a time..? Since you can't have same value of the key in a table
more then once.
Any better way of handling it will be deeply appreciated.
How about locking the table at the begining and releasing the
lock at the end ? Will there be any issue in that? since I am
inserting and deleting the rows in the same transaction.
Comments welcome,
Shobhit
null

How about performing the update IN the database using a stored
procedure?
By using non-database fields on your form to get the
information, you can then call the procedure in the database to
perform the updates. If an error occurs in the procedure you
rollback, if necessary, and send a message or status back to the
form. If it succeeds you might wish to commit and then re-
execute the form's query -- using either the original key values
or the new key values...
null

Deceptive Shipping pratices for orders of more then one phone

Verizon basically cheated anyone if they bought more then one phone. I had the issue associated with the discounts, so I was unable to get my order though till 2:45 central. I ordered 2 phones one sliver 16gb 6 and one gold 16gb 6+. They Sliver 6 said deliver on 9/19 and the 6+ was 10/15. I was upset that it would be delayed cause of the errors on Verizon end but still wanted to save my place in line so I ordered. I considered splitting the order but didn't want to be delayed again. What I'm most upset about is even after confirming with Verizon that I would still receive my 6 on 9/19 I did not. I'm now being told that they can not separate the order and they have to be shipped together. This is a very deceptive practice and it basically gave them another iPhone to sell on opening day. Imagine waiting in line to buy two phones but them selling one of the phones you wanted to someone in line behind you cause they didn't have the other in stock. I fully understand that this was an extremely popular phone but to not have the most basically shipping practices is unacceptable. It is also not right that I was lied to about the shipping practices before launch day. I'm hoping that Verizon will be willing to do something to make this right but I expect a canned answer directing me to the order status page.

unfortunately, there is no option or feature yet in Skype which allow users to login in one computer or device only at a time.
IF YOU FOUND OUR POST USEFUL THEN PLEASE GIVE "KUDOS". IF IT HELPED TO FIX YOUR ISSUE PLEASE MARK IT AS A "SOLUTION" TO HELP OTHERS. THANKS!
ALTERNATIVE SKYPE DOWNLOAD LINKS | HOW TO RECORD SKYPE VIDEO CALLS | HOW TO HANDLE SUSPICIOS CALLS AND MESSAGES
SEE MORE TIPS, TRICKS, TUTORIALS AND UPDATES in
| skypefordummies.blogspot.com |

HOW DO I USE MORE THEN ONE ITUNES WITH MY IPHONE WITHOUT ERASING MY MUSIC?

I have two different laptops with iTunes on it. I use both of them but my iPhone only works with one iTunes. I plug it into the computer and it says that my iPhone cannot use more then one iTunes. Is there a way I can use both or no?
YES I AM CLICKING MANUELLY ADD SONGS TO MY iPhone.
I just bought my iPhone about a week or so ago.
Please help ASAP.

I clone my library to a portable drive using SyncToy 2.1, a free tool from MS. I run this both at home & work so that I essentially have three identical copies of my library for backup redundacy, any of which I can use to update my iPods and my iPhone. I use iTunes Folder Watch occasionaly in case I've managed to download, for example, a podcast at one location but overwrite the library with a newer copy updated at the other. It can be done but you need to take considerable care...
tt2

Can I use more then one apple ID on my computer/osx app store

Hi,
I use my MBP/iMac/ipad/iphone for both business and home. Right now everything is setup to my home apple id (and I have made quite a few purchases with that). With the release of the osx app store and FCPX, my company wants to buy these for my computers. But they want to do this on their apple id. Can I run more then one id on a mac? How can I make this work as I know they will want me to start getting more apps as they are released.

You can have apps from multiple Apple IDs on one Mac. The issue will be that to update Mac apps bought with A ID #1 will require signing into A ID #1 in the MAS. And later when apps bought with A ID #2 need an update you will need to sign into A ID #2 in the MAS to update them. If you can keep that straight and can abide that requirement, there should be no issues.
The same will be true to update iOS apps, but using iTunes.

Update more then one records in join

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for