Update statement issue

Whenever I join two tables in update statement
following error occures ,However all columns exist
update bio1
set appl_uid = demdata.appl_uid
where bio1.cnic = demdata.cnic
ora-00904 demdataid.cnic invalid indentifier

no dear i am at the SQLPLUS prompt and i had the access the of of both of these tables and demdata is the table and appl_uid id is the column, i am just trying to update first_table.appl_uid column with the join of 2nd tables's appl_uid column on the basis of the common field CNIC in between both of these tables, the most simplest update is not working, i am getting late from lunch, plz help
Regards,

Similar Messages

How to track a column is not updated in a update statement issued.

Hello All,
Is there a way to write a trigger when a particular column is not specified in update statement.
For example, consider i have a table with 20 columns(Say Column1...column20). Trigger has to get fired only when column15(say) is not specified.
I know
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER test_trigger
BEFORE UPDATE
OF COLUMN1, COLUMN2......COLUMN20--Except COLUMN15
ON TESTTABLE
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
END of_clause; /
above trigger will solve my problem. But i don't want to mention all columns in this trigger. It will cause maintainance problem afterwards.
Is there any way to mention something like NOT OF COLUMN in the trigger ?
Regards,
Abhijit.

That trigger would get fired for every column except column 15.
What do you mean by "when a particular column is not specified in update statement"? Do you mean that the column is not mentioned at all in the update statement, or that the value of that column is not being changed even if it is mentioned in the statement?
If you mean the former, then I don't think there is any way to do that. however, if you want to do something only if the value in column15 is unchanged, then something along the lines of:
CREATE TRIGGER test_trigger
   BEFORE UPDATE OF testtable
   FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
BEGIN
   IF (:new.column15 IS NULL and :old.column15 IS NULL) OR
      (:new.column15 IS NOT NULL and :old.column15 IS NOT NULL and
       :new.column15 = :old.column15) THEN
      < do whatever for no changes >
   ELSE
      < do nothing or something else for changes >
   END IF;
END;John

Update statement issues.

Hi there I have written this code, the idea is that it does the update only on a certain requirement. However I can not get the update to run. The value I get is still null in the column. Even though I ask for it to be changed. If I run
the updates section on it 's own it works. So what am I doing wrong ?
DECLARE
@NameASVARCHAR(255)
Select@Name=NamefromtbAttributeTemplateDefinition
IF@Name='Occupant'
BEGIN
Update
tbRoom
set
KnownAs=cast(Valueasnvarchar(255))
From
tbAttributeValueA
Join
tbRoomR
ONA.ParentID=R.RoomID
where
R.RoomID=A.ParentIDandA.AttributeTemplateDefinitionLinkID=27
and(R.KnownAsisnullorR.KnownAs='')
and
R.RoomIDin(1317,16264,17182)
END
GO
PRINT
'Changed Columns'
GO
SELECT
*FROMtbRoomRwhereR.RoomIDin(1317,16264,17182)

Aside from the fact that you're missing almost all of the spaces?
What you have posted here shouldn't be able to execute at all or return anything, including a null.
If you want help, please post create table statements (including indexes and constraints) and sample/test data.
Jason Long

DB13 CheckDb and Update Stats Error

Hi,
I am getting below error in CheckDb and Update stats:
Update Stats:
BR0301E SQL error -20003 at location stats_tab_collect-20, SQL statement:
'BEGIN DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS (OWNNAME => '"SAPCRM"', TABNAME => '"WSSOAPPROP_DARK"', ESTIMATE_PERCENT => NULL, METHOD_OPT => 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE 1', DEGREE => NULL
ORA-20003: Specified bug number (5099019) does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 14537
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 14558
ORA-06512: at line 1
Check Db :
BR0301E SQL error -1031 at location BrDbdiffRead-1, SQL statement:
'PREPARE stmt_5 STATEMENT FROM'
'SELECT OBJNAME FROM "SAPSR3".DBDIFF WHERE DBSYS IN ('ORACLE', ' ') AND OBJTYPE = 'TABL' AND DIFFKIND IN ('02', '61', '99') ORDER BY OBJNAME'
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
BR0806I End of BRCONNECT processing: ceeuoqja.chk 2010-12-17 06.30.46
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-12-17 06.30.46
BR0804I BRCONNECT terminated with errors
Above both errors are of different System and both system are just get ready after System Copy of PRD Server.
Please suggest possible route cause of this error.
Shivam

for update stats issue check Note 1417124 - Error ORA-20001 in statistics class CL_SDB_ORA_UPDATE_STATS
for DB check error go through note 400241
Please search before you post your thread on SDN

Performance Issue: Update Statement

Hi Team,
My current environment is Oracle 11g Rac...
My application team is executing a update statement (ofcourse it is there daily activity) ...
updating rows of 1 lac, daily it takes about 3-4 minutes to run the statement.
But today its taking more time i.e more than 8 hours.
then I have generated the explain plan of the update statement and found that its taking full table scan.
Kindly assist me in fixing the issue by letting me know where and how to look for the problem.
**Note: Stats gather is updated
Thanks in advance.
Regards

If you notice there are no indexes to the below update statement -
UPDATE REMEDY_JOURNALS_FACT SET JNL_CREATED_BY_IDENTITY_KEY = ?, JNL_CREATED_BY_HR_KEY = ?, JNL_CREATED_BY_NTWRK_KEY = ?, JNL_MODIFIED_BY_IDENTITY_KEY = ?, JNL_MODIFIED_BY_HR_KEY = ?, JNL_MODIFIED_BY_NTWRK_KEY = ?, JNL_ASSGN_TO_IDENTITY_KEY = ?, JNL_ASSGN_TO_HR_KEY = ?, JNL_ASSGN_TO_NTWRK_KEY = ?, JNL_REMEDY_STATUS_KEY = ?, JOURNALID = ?, JNL_DATE_CREATED = ?, JNL_DATE_MODIFIED = ?, ENTRYTYPE = ?, TMPTEMPDATETIME1 = ?, RELATEDFORMNAME = ?, RELATED_RECORDID = ?, RELATEDFORMKEYWORD = ?, TMPRELATEDRECORDID = ?, ACCESS_X = ?, JOURNAL_TEXT = ?, DATE_X = ?, SHORTDESCRIPTION = ?, TMPCREATEDBY = ?, TMPCREATE_DATE = ?, TMPLASTMODIFIEDBY = ?, TMPMODIFIEDDATE = ?, TMPJOURNALID = ?, JNL_JOURNALTYPE = ?, COPIEDTOWORKLOG = ?, PRIVATE = ?, RELATEDKEYSTONEID = ?, URLLOCATION = ?, ASSIGNEEGROUP = ?, LAST_UPDATE_DT = ? WHERE REMEDY_JOURNALS_KEY = ?
Explain Plan -
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | | | 1055 (100)| | | | | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | REMEDY_JOURNALS_FACT | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10000 | 1 | 784 | 1055 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 4 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 1 | 784 | 1055 (1)| 00:00:05 | 1 | 10 | Q1,00 | PCWC | |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL| REMEDY_JOURNALS_FACT | 1 | 784 | 1055 (1)| 00:00:05 | 1 | 10 | Q1,00 | PCWP | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - storage(:Z>=:Z AND :Z<=:Z AND "REMEDY_JOURNALS_KEY"=:36) filter("REMEDY_JOURNALS_KEY"=:36)
Note
- automatic DOP: skipped because of IO calibrate statistics are missing
Edited by: GeetaM on Aug 17, 2012 2:18 PM

Update statement - no data found issue

Hello,
I have two tables (temp_A and temp_B), they both have two columns (col_1 and col_2)
The following is the data in temp_A:
(1,'A'), (2,'B'), (3,'C'), (4, 'D'), (5, 'E')
The following is the data in temp_B:
(1,'Z'), (2,'Y'), (3,'X'), (4, 'W')
When I run the following query:
update temp_A set col_2 = (select col_2 from temp_B where temp_A.col_1 = temp_B.col_1);
The outcome of temp_A is
(1,'Z'), (2,'Y'), (3,'X'), (4, 'W'), (5,'')
Is there any way that I can get this update statement to skip the row if no data is found instead of setting it to null (because the pairing does not exist in temp_B and thus (5,'') is misleading).
Thanks in advance,
Ivan

Try this -
MERGE INTO temp_a a
   USING (SELECT b.col_1, b.col_2
            FROM temp_b b) b1
   ON (a.col_1 = b1.col_1)
   WHEN MATCHED THEN
      UPDATE
         SET a.col_2 = b1.col_2;Tested -
SQL> select * from temp_a;
     COL_1 CO
         1 A
         2 B
         3 C
         4 D
         5 E
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
SQL>
SQL> select * from temp_b;
     COL_1 CO
         1 Z
         2 Y
         3 X
         4 W
SQL> MERGE INTO temp_a a
2     USING (SELECT b.col_1, b.col_2
3              FROM temp_b b) b1
4     ON (a.col_1 = b1.col_1)
5     WHEN MATCHED THEN
6        UPDATE
7           SET a.col_2 = b1.col_2
8        ;
4 rows merged.
SQL> select * from temp_a;
     COL_1 CO
         1 Z
         2 Y
         3 X
         4 W
         5 EEdited by: Sri on May 26, 2011 1:41 PM
Edited by: Sri on May 26, 2011 1:49 PM

Is their any limit on the number of column updates in a update statement!

Hello All,
Is their any limit on the number of columns to set in a single update statement.+
am using oracle 11g .
example :-
UPDATE FMLY SET as_comp1 = v_as_comp1 , as_comp2 = v_as_comp2, as_comp3 = v_as_comp3, as_comp4 = v_as_comp4 , as_comp5 = v_as_comp5 , perslt18 = v_perslt18 , persot64 = v_persot64 , fam_size = v_fam_size , numchild = total_children , C_AGE1 = v_c_age1, C_AGE2 = v_c_age2, C_AGE3 = v_c_age3, C_AGE4 = v_c_age4 WHERE FAMID = fmly_famid(i) ;
and also is it good practice to issue single update or multiple updates ?
example for the above update i can have multiple statements like .. does the performance matters if so which is good
UPDATE FMLY SET as_comp1 = v_as_comp1 , as_comp2 = v_as_comp2, as_comp3 = v_as_comp3, as_comp4 = v_as_comp4 , as_comp5 = v_as_comp5
WHERE FAMID = fmly_famid(i) ;
UPDATE FMLY SET perslt18 = v_perslt18 , persot64 = v_persot64 , fam_size = v_fam_size
WHERE FAMID = fmly_famid(i) ;
UPDATE FMLY SET numchild = total_children WHERE FAMID = fmly_famid(i) ;
UPDATE FMLY SET C_AGE1 = v_c_age1, C_AGE2 = v_c_age2, C_AGE3 = v_c_age3, C_AGE4 = v_c_age4 WHERE FAMID = fmly_famid(i) ;
thanks/kumar
Edited by: kumar73 on Sep 25, 2010 8:38 AM

If you can do it in a single SQL statement then you should do that.
Here's a mantra that I found to work out pretty good:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:73891904732164

Error while schedulingg update stat in db13

Dear Experts,
Please look into my issue we are facing an error while scheduling update statistics in db13 and I tried to open detailed log
It is given
SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE failed for BRTOOLS - Reason: program_start_error: For More Information, See SYS
Please help me how to solve this my error
Regards

Hi,
Check the owner for BRBACKUP, BRARCHIVE, and BRCONNECT in kernel,
these files should be with SIDADM, if not change the owner to SIDADM and rerun the update stats.
and also Refer the note 446172
Regards,
Ram

Need help to write a query for Update statement with join

Hi there,
The following update statement gives me error as the given table in set statement is invalid. But its the right table .
Is the statement correct? Please help .
update (
       select distinct(vpproadside.VEHICLE_CRED_OVERRIDE.vin)
         from vpproadside.VEHICLE_CRED_OVERRIDE
         join vpproadside.vpp_vehicle
           on vpproadside.vpp_vehicle.vin = vpproadside.VEHICLE_CRED_OVERRIDE.vin
        where VPP_CARRIER_SEQ_NUMBER = 90
          and EXPIRY_DATE = '17-MAR-10'
   set vpproadside.VEHICLE_CRED_OVERRIDE.EXPIRY_DATE = '15-SEP-10';Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 12, 2010 1:00 PM
Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 12, 2010 1:22 PM
Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 12, 2010 2:35 PM
Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 15, 2010 8:04 AM
Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 15, 2010 8:06 AM
Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 15, 2010 8:28 AM

Ask Tom has very good discussion about this, if UPDATE does not work for PK issue, you can use MERGE
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:760068400346785797

FSCM via WS-RM (without PI ) - Update termination issue

Hello experts .
We are trying to integrate SD with FSCM ( credit management) using WS-RM (without PI).
Details of the issue and steps followed so far.
Ideal Scenario :
Once we create / change a sales order ( in SD ) , the interface Creditworthinessquery_out (WS Consumer ) gets triggered (in SD) and the subsequent response CREDITWORTHINESSQUERY_IN(Provider) is triggered from FSCM (with the details of creditworthiness).Once the query response in received an notification is triggered from SD to FSCM (asynchronous service).
After receiving the query response the functionality of credit check happens while creating / changing the sales order .
Configuration steps followed in SOAMANAGER
We have created end points for all the relevant service interfaces (Providers) , and also created logical ports for the respective consumers.
During the creation of logical ports - for the consumers we used the WSDL (of the providers) as the inbound message action.
(This has been done to all the services query , notification that are relevant in our integration).
Current behavior / issue .
While creating sales order the sales order is not getting saved (getting updated in the database).System allows us to complete the sales order creation process and also we get a message as sales order saved successfully. But then there is a update terminated express document that pops up. Sales order is not getting updated in the database.
When I see the logs/traces in SOAMANAGER I see that the query out is successful , query in has the right response (in warning state though) . But no notification is being triggered ?? 
How to overcome this update termination issue ?
When we see the SM13 log , it points to SLD issue (LCR 010: Internal error in SLD API). why do we need a SLD without PI

Hi ,
Finally we are able to solve the update termination issue . But again we are using a work around .
Situation :
Once we executed the VA01 transaction we were getting update termination issue . After lots of debuggung we found that system was trying to get the Business system details ( Own business system data ) . The table lcrt_clntcache had no values.
Solution
We inserted appropriate values in the Table LCRT_CLNTCACH (business system data ) and now it works .This is a work around we got as of now.Credit checks are happening successfully and also integration is good .
(typically if we define business system in SLD (PI) , and run SLD_CHECK , this table gets populated , but in our case we are not using PI instead we are using WS-RM)
But now few questions arise .
a) Why do we need a business system in case we are not using PI ( typically we define business system and technical system in PI ) and instead using WS-RM ?
b) Is it a good practice to update the table ( as did in workaround above )?
c) Is this any bug and needs to be consulted with SAP ?
Please let me know your views .
Edited by: Vedula Adeep on Jan 16, 2012 8:42 AM

Use of ROWID in SQL Update Statement

Hi All,
I have an update statement which uses the rowid column to perform the selection on the target table. Given that a rowid represents the physical location of a row on disk we know that this reference can change when various activities are performed on the database/table/row etc...
Here is an example of the statement I am issuing:
UPDATE tabA outertab SET col1 = 'Value'
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM tabA innertab WHERE outertab.ROWID = outertab.ROWID AND ...)
Obviously the inner query is more complicated and uses other tables etc... but for the purposes of the example we dont need to include the detail.
My question is: When using rowid in a single SQL statement as a reference from a subquery to the outer statement is there a risk that external activities can change the rowid and those changes be reflected within the database session that my query is executing thus causing an inconsistency between the inner and outer SQL clause?
In response to the question which will follow this post: "Why don't you just use a PK", We would like to avoid maintaining a PK on the table as we are talking about very large volumes of data and we dont want to have to issue a call to a sequence if we can avoid it when we are inserting the data. If however there is a risk that this Update statement could fail or update the wrong rows then we may have to use a PK.
I know there is a lot of threads about this but I havnt been able to find one that someone has answered with any kind of confidence or clarity, any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Keith
Edited by: The Turtle on Mar 5, 2009 5:24 AM

When using rowid in a single SQL statement as a reference from a subquery to the outer statement is there a risk that external activities can change the rowid and those changes be reflected within the database session that my query is executing thus causing an inconsistency between the inner and outer SQL clause?No, it's safe to use rowid in this type of query. Docs
A row's assigned rowid remains unchanged unless the row is exported and imported using the Import and Export utilities. When you delete a row from a table and then commit the encompassing transaction, the deleted row's associated rowid can be assigned to a row inserted in a subsequent transaction.

ORA-01403: No data found (Occured in UPDATE Statement)

Dear All,
I am getting No data found error while executing the following UPDATE statement.
UPDATE DEAL
SET CLIENT_CD = 'HDMJARVN'
WHERE CA_REF_NO = 70728
AND CLIENT_CD = 'HDMJARVI';
Wheareas
SELECT *
FROM DEAL
WHERE CA_REF_NO = 70728
AND CLIENT_CD = 'HDMJARVI';
Gives me 1 row.
Please explain.....
Thanks in Advance.

UPDATE DEAL
t line 1:
ORA-01403: no data foundHi Yogesh,
I created a trigger on a table "CHILD" which fires during UPDATE statement. As you may notice, the trigger raises "no data found" exception which is not handled as a result the update ends up with an error.
Similar is your case, investigate the trigger to resolve the issue.
SQL> desc child
Name                                      Null?    Type
B                                                  NUMBER
SQL> create or replace trigger child_trig
2 after update of b on child
3 referencing old as old new as new
4 for each row
5 declare
6    l_dummy number;
7 begin
8    select 1 into l_dummy from dual where dummy = 'TEST';
9 end;
10 /
Trigger created.
SQL> select * from child;
         B
         1
SQL> update child set b = 5;
update child set b = 5
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at "TEST.CHILD_TRIG", line 4
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'TEST.CHILD_TRIG'
SQL>Regards

Case in Update statement

hi,
How to use the case or decode statement in Update statement.

Welcome to Oracle Technology network!
This forum is for SQL*Developer issues - things realed directly to Oracle's SQL*Developer product. Your quesiton about CASE statements in UPDATES is a general SQL question. You will get a better answer if you close this thread and open it again in the SQL and PL/SQL forum which is for SQL questions

Performance degradation in Update statement

Hi
I have a table t1 with 3 of the columns as :- c1 ,c2,c3.
there is a non unique index on c2 ,c3.
I am using an update statement as : update t1 set c1="value" where c2="some_value" and c3="some_value2" ;
this works fine in case the number of rows for the same c2 and c3 are less (~100) but takes a large time when ~30,000.
And it has to be run many times in my application (time out is occuring now)
Can anybody suggest a solution ?
Thanks
Message was edited by:
user580975

First off, setting a table to NOLOGGING does not affect the rate of redo generation unless you are also doing direct-path inserts (which is obviously not the case here and which come with their own set of issues). Note that the amount of redo being generated in these two examples is quite similar.
SCOTT @ jcave102 Local> create table all_obj_cpy as select * from all_objects;
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:10.78
SCOTT @ jcave102 Local> set autotrace traceonly;
SCOTT @ jcave102 Local> alter table all_obj_cpy logging;
Table altered.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SCOTT @ jcave102 Local> update all_obj_cpy
2 set last_ddl_time = sysdate - 1;
42511 rows updated.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.45
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1645016300
| Id | Operation          | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT   |             | 43776 |   384K|   137   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 | UPDATE            | ALL_OBJ_CPY |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| ALL_OBJ_CPY | 43776 |   384K|   137   (3)| 00:00:02 |
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
        556 recursive calls
      46075 db block gets
       1558 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
   13575764 redo size
        924 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        965 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          6 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          6 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      42511 rows processed
SCOTT @ jcave102 Local> alter table all_obj_cpy nologging;
Table altered.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SCOTT @ jcave102 Local> update all_obj_cpy
2 set last_ddl_time = sysdate - 2;
42511 rows updated.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.32
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1645016300
| Id | Operation          | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT   |             | 43776 |   384K|   137   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 | UPDATE            | ALL_OBJ_CPY |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| ALL_OBJ_CPY | 43776 |   384K|   137   (3)| 00:00:02 |
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
        561 recursive calls
      44949 db block gets
       1496 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
   12799600 redo size
        924 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        965 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          6 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          6 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      42511 rows processedSecond, if you did manage to do an unlogged operation, make absolutely certain you understand the recovery implications. You must do a complete backup of the database after an unlogged operation or the table will not be recovered in the event of a database failure. If you have a standby database for disaster recovery, unlogged operations would cause the standby to be useless (hence the option to force logging at the tablespace and/or database level).
While it's certainly possible that this is an Oracle server configuration problem, it would be relatively tough to configure a system so that a 30,000 row update would force excessive log switches. If it were a configuration problem, you'd expect that any update of 30,000 rows would be slow and that multiple sessions running smaller updates would also be slow, but I don't believe that describes the symptoms the original poster is concerned about.
Justin

Weird problem when executing an update statement

Please help me out with this issue. This a very weird problem i'm facing while executing the following update statement.
update tblo.S_TABLE c
SET (ACCNT_NAME, ACCNT_LOC)
=
(select NAME, LOC from S_TABLE1 p
where p.ROW_ID = c.ACCNT_ID)
where ROW_ID = 'XXXXX'
The statement executes perfectly fine in "SQL Plus" but when i try from my application or any SQL Tool that uses ODBC, it fails with the following error
<eb1>ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected
State:S1000,Native:923,Origin:[Oracle][ODBC][Ora]</eb1>
ODBC Driver Used: 9.2.0.2.0

Yes this could most probably be resolved by upgrading the driver. I'hv tried MS Oracle ODBC driver but that is even more problematic!
The applications works fine in another environment which uses a Merant ODBC driver. Thanks for your time and advice.

Update statement issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for