User_catalog - object listed as both 'TABLE' and 'MATERIALIZED VIEW'

SELECT * FROM USER_CATALOG ORDER BY OBJECT_NAME
returns ...
OBJECT_NAME              OBJECT_TYPE
BLOBBY                   SYNONYM
BONUS                    TABLE
DEPT                     TABLE
EMP                      TABLE
EMPLOYEES                SYNONYM
EMPWITHDEPT              MATERIALIZED VIEW
EMPWITHDEPT              TABLE
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^Any ideas to show only the 'MATERIALIZED VIEW' row for the above query?
Thanks in advance,
Mike Norman

So, I would need some sort of logic to
check if the OBJECT_NAME from user_objects
is present in user_snapshots print 'MATERIALIZED VIEW'
otherwise take the OBJECT_TYPE from user_objects -
some sort of DECODE?

Similar Messages

Table and Materialized View in different namespaces?

I've just faced something completly new for me. It appears that there are two objects with the same name and owner. Table and Materialized View have the same names and when I look into system dictionary I can se sth. like that:
OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_ID DATA_OBJECT_ID OBJECT_TYPE NAMESPACE
USER_A USER_TABLE 159381 159381 TABLE 1
USER_A USER_TABLE 159382 MATERIALIZED VIEW 19
(I couldn't find how to write above with const length font).
Two object in different namespace? I thought that Tables and Materialized Vievs have the same namespace.
Can you please tell me how can I create objects to achieve above result? I would also be grateful if you tell me where to find that topic in documentation.

Perfectly normal.
SQL> select object_name, object_type from user_objects where object_name = 'TEST_MV';
no rows selected
SQL>
SQL> create materialized view test_mv
2 as
3 select sysdate from dual;
Materialized view created.
SQL>
SQL> select object_name, object_type from user_objects where object_name = 'TEST_MV';
OBJECT_NAME                                        OBJECT_TYPE
TEST_MV                                            TABLE
TEST_MV                                            MATERIALIZED VIEW
SQL>
SQL> drop materialized view test_mv;
Materialized view dropped.
SQL>
SQL> select object_name, object_type from user_objects where object_name = 'TEST_MV';
no rows selected
SQL>

Oracle equals_path condition NOT working with table and materialized view

The user i am using is xdb with dba role.
1.When i try to use the statement
SELECT PATH FROM xdb.path_VIEW
WHERE
EQUALS_PATH(res, '/home/OE/PurchaseOrders/2002')=1
the result is
/home/OE/PurchaseOrders/2002
2. When i drop the path_view and recreated it like materialized view with statement
create MATERIALIZED view path_view as
select /*+ ORDERED */ t2.path path, t.res res,
xmltype.createxml(xdb.xdb_link_type(NULL, r2.xmldata.dispname, t.name,
h.name, h.flags, h.parent_oid, h.child_oid),
'http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/XDBStandard.xsd', 'LINK') link,
t.resid
from ( select xdb.all_path(9999) paths, value(p) res, p.sys_nc_oid$ resid,
p.xmldata.dispname name
from xdb.xdb$resource p
where xdb.under_path(value(p), '/', 9999)=1 ) t,
TABLE( cast (t.paths as xdb.path_array) ) t2,
xdb.xdb$h_link h, xdb.xdb$resource r2
where t2.parent_oid = h.parent_oid and t2.childname = h.name and
t2.parent_oid = r2.sys_nc_oid$
then the equals_path condition STOP working !!!
3. The same experiment, but i recreate it like table
create table path_view as .... using the rest of the statement ...
Can someone help me to understand why equals_path is NOT working on table and materialized view !

Thanks Jonah. I was under the impression that I already had it but seems like it has to be a direct priv - thru a role doesn't work.
I granted the reqd privs and then it worked fine. Thx for your help!

Truncate table and materialized view log

I user oracle 10 R2
I have a table and on that table a materialized view log.
I execute in a pl/sql procedure:
1) execute immediate('drop materialized view log on tab1');
then:
2) execute immediate('truncate table tab1');
3) Now I insert a lot of records in tab1
4) execute immediate('create materialized view log on tab1 WITH rowid INCLUDING NEW VALUES');
When I create the materialized view log I recieved this message:
ora32321: refresh fast on tab2 unsupported after detail table truncate
Why?

Refresh fast after truncate operation on container table is not supported, regardless the container table is or is not partitioned.
Perform a refresh complete.
ORA-32321 :
Cause:     A detail table has been truncated and no materialized view
     supports fast refersh after a detail table has been truncated
Action:     Use REFRESH COMPLETE. Note: you can determine why your
     materialized view does not support fast refresh after TRUNCATE
     using the DBMS_MVIEW.EXPLAIN_MV() API.

Performance difference between tables and materialized views

hi ,
I created a materialized view on a query that involves partition table in it.
When i used the same query and created a table out of it <create table xyz as select * from (the query)> ,the table got created quickly.
So does that mean performance wise creating table is faster than creating/refreshing the materialized view ?or is that due to the refresh method i use ?Currently i use a complete refresh

I created a materialized view on a query that involves partition table in it.
When i used the same query and created a table out of it <create table xyz as select * from (the query)> ,the table got created quickly.
So does that mean performance wise creating table is faster than creating/refreshing the materialized view ?or is that due to the refresh method i use ?Currently i use a complete refresh Well, for starters, if you created the materialized view first and then the standard table, the data for the second one has already been fetched recently and so will reduce your I/O due to caching, and will therefore be quicker. There are also other factors such as the materialized view creating other internal bits that are required to allow for refreshes to be done quickly, such as the primary key etc which you haven't created on your second creation.
What you have shown is that two completely different statements running at different times, appear to operate with different speed. It is not a comparison of whether the materialized view is slower or quicker than the create table statement.

List of unused tables and procedures

Hi,
I am in the task of clean up of tables.
I need to find the list unused tables and procedures.
Is there any way where i can find when was the last time the table queried?
Also, Can you please give sql query to find the list of unused tables and procedures.
Appreciate your response.
Thanks...

There is not a definitive way to complete this task. This becomes especially complicated if you have SQL / PL/SQL embedded in your applications external to the database. You could start looking at DBA_DEPENDENCIES, and that will at least give you a start to identifying objects that might not be used in the database.
Another possibility is implementing auditing on suspected objects to see if there is any activity. You'll need to determine though if you have any business processes that have a long cycle (quarter, annually, etc) to ensure you aren't dropping an object that is actually used.

Need to get a dependent dependent objects list on a table

Hi
I am trying to get the dependent object list on a table like triggers ,indexes,synonyms etc.. through PL/SQL code.
Example :
For table per_all_people_f we need to list how many triggers are there.. and what all those... etc.
Can anyone help on this issue?
Thanks
Preeti

SQL> exec dbms_utility.get_dependency('TABLE', 'SCOTT', 'EMP');
DEPENDENCIES ON SCOTT.EMP
*TABLE SCOTT.EMP()
*   PROCEDURE SCOTT.P1()
*   PACKAGE SCOTT.PACK_CUR()
*      PACKAGE BODY SCOTT.PACK_CUR()
*   VIEW SCOTT.EMP_VIEW()
*   PACKAGE SCOTT.PACK_CUR1()
*      PACKAGE BODY SCOTT.PACK_CUR1()
*   PACKAGE BODY SCOTT.MANAGE_EMPS()
*   PROCEDURE SCOTT.DP_PR1()
*   FUNCTION SCOTT.TESTFUN()
*      PROCEDURE SCOTT.P1()
*   PROCEDURE SCOTT.CALC_BONUS()
*   VIEW SCOTT.TESTVEW()
*   FUNCTION SCOTT.SP_LISTEMP()
*   VIEW SCOTT.EMP1()
*   VIEW SCOTT.VW_RR()
*   TRIGGER SCOTT.TR_EMP_REC()
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

PO with both service and material

Dear all
Can anyone give a structure of PO which invoves both Service and Material component and both are inseperable.
Service tax is applicable on service portion and VAT is applicable on material.
Thanks in advance

hi,
As per your requirement create PO with 2 line items
Line Item 10 for service : item cat D, a/assignment K , material group etc
select service master or text (at service details tab in item level)
select relevant tax code with service tax. (invoice tab)
line item 20
here enter material master, price, plant etc.
select appropriate tax code with VAT ( invoice tab)
save
say PO created 4500018024
Now When you receive the service perform service entry sheet (ML81N) for 4500018024 item 10
accept and save
When you receive the material perform MIGO for 4500018024 item 20
finally when you got the invoice
Perform MIRO against PO no ( no need to enter item ) and select Goods/Service items
It will select both line item simulate and post
and if you want to Perform MIRO separately then
in MIRO enter 4500018024 item 10
and then 4500018024 item 20.
that's it

List of SQL tables and attributes used in SSRS reports

Hi,
I have around 450-500 reports deployed in SSRS reporting server.
All these reports are built on SQL from multiple databases, and these databases are having unnecessary tables and attributes.
My requirement is to clean the unused tables and attributes from the databases. For this, I need the list of SQL tables and attributes used in these 450-500 SSRS reports.
Is there any way to get this data?
Regards,
RK

Hi RK,
According to your description, you want to get a list of the tables and attributes used in all reports.
In your scenario, you can query the ReportServer.dbo.Catalog table to get Report name, data source name, dataset name, and query used in the dataset with query below:
WITH XMLNAMESPACES ( DEFAULT 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2010/01/reportdefinition', 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQLServer/reporting/reportdesigner' AS rd )
SELECT ReportName = name
,DataSetName = x.value('(@Name)[1]', 'VARCHAR(250)')
,DataSourceName = x.value('(Query/DataSourceName)[1]','VARCHAR(250)')
,CommandText = x.value('(Query/CommandText)[1]','VARCHAR(250)')
,Fields = df.value('(@Name)[1]','VARCHAR(250)')
,DataField = df.value('(DataField)[1]','VARCHAR(250)')
,DataType = df.value('(rd:TypeName)[1]','VARCHAR(250)')
--,ConnectionString = x.value('(ConnectionProperties/ConnectString)[1]','VARCHAR(250)')
FROM ( SELECT C.Name,CONVERT(XML,CONVERT(VARBINARY(MAX),C.Content)) AS reportXML
FROM ReportServer.dbo.Catalog C
WHERE C.Content is not null
AND C.Type = 2
) a
CROSS APPLY reportXML.nodes('/Report/DataSets/DataSet') r ( x )
CROSS APPLY x.nodes('Fields/Field') f(df)
ORDER BY name
For more information, please refer to this similar thread:
Extract metadata from report server database
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best regards,
Qiuyun Yu
Qiuyun Yu
TechNet Community Support

Not option for Transport under the tab Change list in both IR and ID

Hello All,
The option transport is missing in tab change list for both IR and ID. We have created the track, maintained the systems in the NWDI but still no luck. We have also included the SC SAP-INTDIR 3.0 for both the tracks (i.e.) IR and ID. Also we are running a seperate NWDI server for CMS and the SLD is with the XI production server.
Am I missing any configuration? Kindly suggest
Regards,
Anand

Hi Anand
Please check if the following link is of some good to you:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/45/f9f02cf3e41ecce10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
Also check for steps mentioned here:
http://www.saptechies.com/minisap-610-installation/
I hope it helps
Regards
Chen

Relations Between MLCD table and material movements type

Dear all,
I Have a question about relations between MLCD table and Material movements. For Example We have a movement type Z71 when we did a movevent with tis movement type from MB1C Transaction. System creates a record in Mlcd Table. in this table Category field is VN and PCat field is V. How system decides about VN and V
is there any table which contains these conversions or is there any custimization in MM or CO modules ?
Could you please help me if you have any information about subject.
Best Regards

Hi Anupam
Thanks for your speedy reply.sorry i forget to mention i need FG materials details for given plant,production version,metrial type.In
MKAL i am not able to give material type as input parameter
Regards
Bala

Need to get a list of PSA tables and change log tables existing in a PC

Is there a standars table to look up all active DSOs and the change log tables associated to those DSOs?
and also Data sources and the PSA tables associated to that DS.
I need to get a list of PSA tables and change log tables existing in a processchain(whioch deletes the data in them time to time)how do I do this in a quicker way?
Thanks in advance

Hi Ramya
Check RSTSODS table with filter of User App CHANGELOG ---> For change log tables

Help with query rewrite and materialized views

Hello everybody,
I'm currently learning how to use Oracle (10G Enterprise) and in particular, Materialized Views.
I seem to have a problem making the optimizer use a materialized view. I have already set the OPTIMIZER_MODE, QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED and QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY as needed.
I need to create a materialized view for the following query:
Q1:
SELECT PS_SUPPKEY, PS_PARTKEY, PS_SUPPCOST
FROM PARTSUPPLIER E, PART WHERE PS_PARTKEY=P_PARTKEY and (lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE ''_o_a\%'' or lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE ''_o_u\%'')
and PS_SUPPCOST =
(SELECT min( PS_SUPPCOST)
FROM PARTSUPPLIER I
WHERE E.PS_PARTKEY=I.PS_PARTKEY)'
I created it using the following code:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_q1
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS SELECT PS_SUPPKEY, PS_PARTKEY, PS_SUPPCOST
FROM PARTSUPPLIER E JOIN PART ON (PS_PARTKEY=P_PARTKEY)
WHERE lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE '_o_a%' or lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE '_o_u%'
and PS_SUPPCOST=
(SELECT min( PS_SUPPCOST)
FROM PARTSUPPLIER I
WHERE E.PS_PARTKEY=I.PS_PARTKEY);
I have created the statistics using:
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('frandres',' mv_q1');
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('frandres','PARTSUPPLIER');
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('frandres','PART');
Both partsupplier and part are tables and not views.
When executing Q1, the plan does not use the materialized view. Furthermore, when using explain rewrite:
DECLARE
qrytxt VARCHAR2(3000) := 'SELECT PS_SUPPKEY, PS_PARTKEY, PS_SUPPCOST
FROM PARTSUPPLIER E, PART WHERE PS_PARTKEY=P_PARTKEY and (lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE ''_o_a\%'' or lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE ''_o_u\%'')
and PS_SUPPCOST =
(SELECT min( PS_SUPPCOST)
FROM PARTSUPPLIER I
WHERE E.PS_PARTKEY=I.PS_PARTKEY)';
BEGIN
dbms_mview.EXPLAIN_REWRITE
(qrytxt,'MV_Q1','MV_Q1');
END;
I get the following message:
MESSAGE
QSM-01150: query did not rewrite
QSM-01263: query rewrite not possible when query references a dictionary table o
r view
QSM-01219: no suitable materialized view found to rewrite this query
What I can't understand is why it says I am referencing the dictionary or a view?
If I remove the (lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE ''_o_a\%'' or lower(P_COMMENT) LIKE ''_o_u\%'') condition to the query (using the same materialized view), I get the following message from EXPLAIN_REWRITE:
MESSAGE
QSM-01150: query did not rewrite
QSM-01219: no suitable materialized view found to rewrite this query
Which is reasonable.
I don't know if the like condition is messing up my materialized view. Can anyone please help?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Edited by: user12072111 on Oct 29, 2009 9:43 PM

Bingo!
The 10.2.0.3 patch set is supposed to fix this ( [List of bugs fixed (MVs)|http://www.dbatools.net/doc/bug10203.html#MVIEW] )
In particular:
5052568 Query rewrite does not work for SQL with LIKE clause.
Thank you very much for your message!
The downside is that I'm only using Oracle for educational purposes and consequently have no Metalink id, so I can't install the patch. Thanks a lot though!

Authorization for material type and material views

Hello all,
I would need to restrict a user group, in creation (MM01) and modification of material master, based of type material and material views.
The authorization, for each user should be:
- view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER;
- view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF.
I tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects:
1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B)
2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
but the effect is to be authorized, to all view for material type ZFER and ZOFF.
I have already updated the authorization group of the type materials (OMS2).
Is there a solution for this problem?
(component version SAP ECC 6.0)
Thanks.
Regards,
Luca

I tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects: 1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) 2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
- Are both these roles assigned to the same user? then your purpose is not solved, It is more or less like giving full authorization.
- One role should be
M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) for view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER. This should be assigned to one user
- Second role should be
M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZOFF and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = * for view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF. This role should be assigned to the second user.
Regards,
Subbu

What is the difference between view and materialized views

Hi
What is the difference between view and materialized view ? can we update the base table using views

can we update the base table using viewsYes:
VIEWS
1. an updatable view is one that lets you perform DML on the underlying table
(see Oracle Database Concepts 10g - 5 Schema Objects)
2. non-updatable view requires INSTEAD OF Triggers
(see Oracle Database Concepts 10g - 22 Triggers)
SNAPSHOTS
You can have updateable (and writeable) snapshots - in updateable (writeable) MV replication.
Oracle uses snapshots (Materialized Views - MV) for two different purposes:
1. replication
2. automated Query Rewrite facility (first introduced in Oracle Discoverer, later included in Oracle database 8i).
Replication types in Oracle are:
a) Basic replication (MV replication)
- transaction based
- row-level
- asynchronous from master table to MV (Materialized View)
- DML replication only
- database 7 / 8.0 / 8i / 9i / 10g
- Standard and Enterprise Edition
1. Read-only MV replication
2. Updateable MV replication:
2.1 asynchronous from MV to master
2.2 synchronous from MV to master
3. Writeable MV replication
b) Multimaster replication
- transaction based
- row-level or procedural
- asynchronous or synchronous
- DML and DDL replication
- database 7 / 8.0 / 8i / 9i / 10g
- Enterprise Edition only
1. row-level asynchronous replication
2. row-level synchronous replication
3. procedural asynchronous replication
4. procedural synchronous replication
c) Streams replication
- (redo) log based
- row-level
- asynchronous
- DML and DDL replication
- database 9i / 10g (10g has Down Streams Capture)
- Enterprise Edition only (Standard Edition 10g can execute Apply process)
Regards,
Zlatko Sirotic

User_catalog - object listed as both 'TABLE' and 'MATERIALIZED VIEW'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for