Using Decode in where clause in free hand sql

Hi,
I want to use decode in free hand sql.
for eg : this is a where condition
Outlet_Lookup.City = @variable('Enter City')
Requirement :
if we put the user prompt as "Enter City and % for all cities"
and the user enters % then the data display should be all cities or else it shld be the specific city entered in the prmpt..
Can we do that using Decode statement,
I have tried
Outlet_Lookup.City = Decode(@variable('Enter City'),'%',Outlet_Lookup.City,(@variable('Enter City')))
This is not working....
Pls guide on the same..
Thanks.

Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for the solution,
I tried the following
((Outlet_Lookup.City = @variable('Enter City or % for All') or @variable('Enter City or % for All')='%'))
This is working fine....
Thanks
Regards,
Aparna.

Similar Messages

Can i use Decode in Where clause

Hi,
Can i use Decode in Where clause Please Do the need full on the same.
Thanks,
Sanjeev.

set serveroutput on
DECLARE
posn PLS_INTEGER := 0;
empid PLS_INTEGER := 178;
x     NUMBER;
BEGIN
SELECT NVL(SUM(ah.quantity * ah.saleprice * ap.payoutpct), 0)
INTO x
FROM accessoryhistory ah, payoutpercentage ap,
sku s, store st
WHERE empid = DECODE(posn,
                          0, st.areadir,
                          1, st.areamgr,
                          2, NVL(st.storemgr1, st.storemgr2),
                          3, NVL(st.asstmgr1, NVL(st.asstmgr2,
                       st.asstmgr3)))
AND ah.statustype IN ('ACT', 'DEA')
AND ah.store = st.store
AND s.dbid = ah.dbid
AND s.sku = ah.sku
AND ap.productgroup = s.productgroup
AND ap.position = posn;
dbms_output.put_line(x);
END;
/http://psoug.org/reference/decode_case.html

Using decode in where clause

Hi all
We can use decode function in the Select columns as well as Group by Columns as well as Having Clause
Can we use decode function in the where clause also. If yes can u give small sample
Suresh Bansal

""DECODE in the WHERE clause"
http://psoug.org/reference/decode_case.html
WHERE empid = DECODE(posn,
                          0, st.areadir,
                          1, st.areamgr,
                          2, NVL(st.storemgr1, st.storemgr2),
                          3, NVL(st.asstmgr1, NVL(st.asstmgr2,
                       st.asstmgr3)))

Using decode in where clause with user defined function

Hi,
I have a below query which is failing as the function in the decode taking all cust_account_id as input parameter instead of the one which satisfies the condition in the inner query.So please provide a solution how can i pass only the selected one.
SELECT hca.cust_account_id
FROM hz_cust_accounts hca
WHERE hca.org_id=FND_PROFILE.value('ORG_ID')
AND hca.cust_account_id = (SELECT DISTINCT hcasa.cust_account_id
FROM hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcasa
WHERE hcasa.cust_account_id =hca.cust_account_id
AND hca.org_id = hcasa.org_id)
AND DECODE (hca.status , 'A', xx_ar_cust_audit_pkg.get_ship_to_order_type(hca.cust_account_id)) IS NOT NULL
Thanks,
Abhilash

I'm having to guess without access to your tables, but I think changing the IN to a join should produce the same results. The JOIN should be evaluated before applying the WHERE clause, so this may resolve your problem.
SELECT hca.cust_account_id
FROM   hz_cust_accounts hca
       INNER JOIN hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcasa
       ON    hcasa.cust_account_id = hca.cust_account_id
       AND   hca.org_id = hcasa.org_id
WHERE hca.org_id = FND_PROFILE.value('ORG_ID')
AND    DECODE (hca.status , 'A', xx_ar_cust_audit_pkg.get_ship_to_order_type(hca.cust_account_id)) IS NOT NULLAlternately, you could next part of the query and break the DECODE into the parent so it is evaluated after the inner query. This is likely uglier from a performance standpoint, though:
SELECT cust_account_id
FROM
SELECT hca.cust_account_id, hca.status
FROM   hz_cust_accounts hca
WHERE hca.org_id=FND_PROFILE.value('ORG_ID')
AND    hca.cust_account_id = (SELECT DISTINCT hcasa.cust_account_id
                              FROM   hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcasa
                              WHERE hcasa.cust_account_id =hca.cust_account_id
                              AND    hca.org_id = hcasa.org_id)
WHERE DECODE (status , 'A', xx_ar_cust_audit_pkg.get_ship_to_order_type(cust_account_id)) IS NOT NULL;

Error while using REMAP_TABLE and WHERE clause together in IMPDP

I am trying to move some records from a very large table to another small table.
I am facing trouble while using REMAP_TABLE and WHERE clause together in IMPDP.
Problem is data filter is not getting applied and all records are getting imported.
here is how I have simulated this. please advice.
CREATE TABLE TSHARRHB.TMP1
A NUMBER,
B NUMBER
begin
Insert into TSHARRHB.TMP1
   (A, B)
Values
   (1, 1);
Insert into TSHARRHB.TMP1
   (A, B)
Values
   (2, 2);
COMMIT;
end;
expdp system/password TABLES=tsharrhb.TMP1 DIRECTORY=GRDP_EXP_DIR DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp REUSE_DUMPFILES=YES LOGFILE=EXP.log PARALLEL=8
impdp system/password DIRECTORY=GRDP_EXP_DIR DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=imp.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY='TSHARRHB.TMP1:"WHERE TMP1.A = 2"' REMAP_TABLE=TSHARRHB.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Import: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Fri Dec 13 05:13:30 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP, Data Mining
and Real Application Testing options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01": system/********@GRD6.RBSG DIRECTORY=GRDP_EXP_DIR DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=SSD_93_TABLES_FULL_EXP.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY=TSHARRHB.TMP1:"WHERE TMP1.A = 2" REMAP_TABLE=TSHARRHB.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
. . imported "TSHARRHB"."TMP3"                           5.421 KB       2 rows
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully completed at 05:13:33
here I am expecting only 1 record to get imported but both the records are getting imported. please advice.

The strange thing compared to your output is that I get an error when I have table prefix in the query block:
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01": system/******** DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=imp.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY=SYSADM.TMP1:"WHERE TMP1.A = 2" REMAP_TABLE=SYSADM.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
ORA-31693: Table data object "SYSADM"."TMP3" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-38500: Unsupported operation: Oracle XML DB not present
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" completed with 1 error(s) at Fri Dec 13 10:39:11 2013 elapsed 0 00:00:03
And if I remove it, it works:
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01": system/******** DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=imp.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY=SYSADM.TMP1:"WHERE A = 2" REMAP_TABLE=SYSADM.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
. . imported "SYSADM"."TMP3"                             5.406 KB       1 out of 2 rows
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully completed at Fri Dec 13 10:36:50 2013 elapsed 0 00:00:01
Nicolas.
PS: as you can see, I'm on 11.2.0.4, I do not have 11.2.0.1 that you seem to use.

Can a report be developed using free hand SQL(Sql Query) using a DB Link

Hello All,
A report to be developed based on query in OBIEE dashboards
Select Query -----1
UNION
Select Query------2
First select query is coming from one database schema and second is coming from the other.
Is there any way to develop the report using free hand SQL based on a DB link?
Is there any feature to use Database link (DB link)?
Thank in Advance,
SMA

What you ask is the direct database request capabilities :
http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/presentation_service/obiee_direct_database_request
But you can also use the federated query capabilities of the repository to model a star schema with two star schema from two different data source.
Cheers
Nico

Using function in where clause

I have created a function as follows
create or replace FUNCTION get_codes RETURN varchar2 IS
scodes varchar2(50) := 'A1,A2';
BEGIN
scodes := '('''||REPLACE(scodes,',',''',''')||''')';
return scodes;
END;
this function returns ('A1','A2')
now i want to use this in where clause, both below statements fetches no rows
select * from tablea where code in (select get_codes from dual);
select * from tablea where code in get_codes;
but the following will fetch rows
select * from tablea where code in ('A1','A2')
how to use function in where clause
Thanks

Hi,
The code that works:
where code in ('A1','A2')is testing whther code is either of two 2-character strings, A1 or A2.
The ones that don't work, such as:
where code in get_codes;are comparing code to one 9-character string: 'A1','A2', where characters 1, 4, 6 and 9 are single-quotes. (The function can only return one value.)
You can use dynamic SQL to embed that 9-character string in part of your query, where it will be interpreted as two 2-character strrings.
[Oracle Base|http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/DynamicInLists.php] and AskTom have good pages on the subject of dynamic IN-lists.
Of you can use INSTR or LIKE:
where INSTR ( get_codes
, '''' || code || ''''
) > 0

Using Date in where clause

Hello all,
I am new to Oracle, currently using 10G + aspvbscript.
I've been trying to query data using date in where clause but nothing seems to work.
The column is in date format.
It gets printed out like this: 5/1/2010 11:21:19 AM
I tried using this query:
SELECT * from table where TRUNC(user_date) > to_date('FEB-01-2010:00:00:00','mm-dd-yyyy:HH24:MI:SS') order by user_date asc.
It does return an output but it returns everything in table and does not take WHERE clause into consideration however, it does sort the date in ascending order.
I've tried getting rid of TRUNC tried to format date in a different way but no such luck.
Please point me to the right direction.
Thanks.

Welcome to the forums!
In cases like this it is helpful if you can provide the following information:
1. Oracle version (SELECT * FROM V$VERSION)
2. Sample data in the form of CREATE / INSERT statements.
3. Expected output
4. Explanation of expected output (A.K.A. "business logic")
5. Use \ tags for #2 and #3. See FAQ (Link on top right side) for details.
I'll try and take a stab at your request based on the data given. What your query says is that it will return all rows that have a date greater then 2/1/2010 (MM/DD/YYYY). If your query is returning all rows then maybe the possibility exists that all the dates in the table are greater then 2/1/2010. Have you checked all dates to see if this is the case?
Also, one note about your TO_DATE() function.to_date('FEB-01-2010:00:00:00','mm-dd-yyyy:HH24:MI:SS')The date format does not match the string you are using with respect to month. Your string has 'FEB' but the format is 'MM' which is the numeric representation of the month. Although Oracle was able to convert it to the proper date on my system you should try and maintain consistency between the string and the date format used.

Using distinct in where clause

Greedings,
I am trying to execute some kind of distinct using rowid in where clause but for some reason im not getting the appropriate result. Any guidance is welcome
SELECT acnt_code,cat,cat_desc,buc FROM so_budgets_cat where
Trim(buc)='S03'
and
NOT exists (SELECT 1
                   from   so_budgets_cat tab2
                   where ( tab2.cat     = so_budgets_cat.cat )
                   and    tab2.ROWID > so_budgets_cat.ROWID
ORDER BY cat,so_budgets_cat.rowidThanks in advance

Additionally to the fact that we don't have an idea on the expected output, I can't understand the comparison of ROWIDs in your query. These are the logical addresses where the data reside in the disks, comparing them doesn't make sense to me; Oracle DB defines where to store, based on space availability in the disk allocation to the database occupation - and NOT in a logical sequence.
Maybe the existing row is stored in an address that is not a higher number than other, and so it is not being retrieved in your sub-query - hence your test for distinction is failing.

Can both in-row and off-row LOBs be used in a where clause?

We are preparing to upgrade ASE from version 15.5 to 16.0. One of the features that is very appealing has to do with the changes made concerning the handling of LOBs. In particular, the ability to use a LOB column in search arguments (where clause) is something our developers have longed for since the retirement of the full-text search option. So, in version 16.0, can any column with a datatype of text be used as a search argument? Are there any restrictions.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Kevin,
The in-row LOB feature is mainly designed to save space when a text column has many short values, which is a particularly bad problem when the server uses a large page size (like 16K) as ASE would use a full 16K to store even a single bye "Y". I don't think the feature made any change in how text can be used in search arguments. i.e. you can still use LIKE and IS [NOT] NULL, but not others.
Example:
1> create table t (x text in row (8))
2> go
1> insert t values ("abc")
2> insert t values ("abcdefghijkl")
3> go
(2 rows affected)
1> select * from t where x like "%c%"
2> go
x
abc
abcdefghijkl
(2 rows affected)
1> select * from t where x !> "c"
2> go
Msg 257, Level 16, State 1:
Server 'redhead', Line 1:
Implicit conversion from datatype 'TEXT' to 'VARCHAR' is not allowed. Use the
CONVERT function to run this query.
Msg 306, Level 16, State 5:
Server 'redhead', Line 1:
TEXT, IMAGE and UNITEXT datatypes may not be used in a WHERE clause, except with
the LIKE expression and IS [NOT] NULL predicate on columns.

Using a dummy where-clause to force the use of an index

I notice that an index only gets used when I use the index key in the where clause. Should I use a dummy where clause to force the index to be used?
SQL> create table emp (
2 empno NUMBER(5),
3 empname VARCHAR2(15) );
Table created.
SQL> create index idx_emp_no on emp (empno);
Index created.
SQL> insert into emp (empno, empname) values (1, 'Peter');
1 row created.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly;
SQL> select empno from emp;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 1 | 13 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL> select empno from emp where empno > 0;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 434430053
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_EMP_NO | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
As you can see, using a dummy where clause (empno > 0), I manage to reduce the cost from 3 to 1.

Again. Be careful with comparisons. But I like the discussion. It is usefull to carefully look at what happens "behind the scenes" and find a sensible explaination for that.
Your new scenario now is different. By selecting one specific row instead of selection all you already made an assumption. That only one or few of the rows are returned. Andre's statement still is correct. Now the CBO will prefere the index scan.
The CBO now has to decide between two options.
Option a) use the index.
This means =>
Step 1: Access the index to find the value
Step 2: Access the table using the rowid that was found in the index leaf entry.
Option b) scan the full table
This means =>
Step 1: Iterate over all rows of the table
Step 2: Apply a filter condition (empno = :x)
We can see this execution plan by adding a hint to the query.
select /*+ FULL(emp) */ * from emp where empno = 1;This hint will force the CBO to access the table emp using a full table scan.
The cost in my environment for option B is 3.
Option A has a cost with 2. Therefore the CBO prefers Option A.
However this can easily change.
Consider the following
begin
for i in 1..1000 loop
    insert into emp (empno, empname) values (1, 'Employee');
end loop;
end;
commit;
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'EMP');The run the select again.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> select * from emp where empno = 1;
1001 Zeilen ausgewõhlt.
Ausf³hrungsplan
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation         | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      | 1001 | 12012 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 1001 | 12012 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("EMPNO"=1)
Statistiken
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
         74 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      18356 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1250 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
       1001 rows processedThe CBO now prefers the full table scan and not the index access.
If we force it to use an index then the cost increases.
SQL> set linesize 100
SQL> select /*+INDEX(emp) */ * from emp where empno = 1
1001 Zeilen ausgewõhlt.
Ausf³hrungsplan
Plan hash value: 2426388914
| Id | Operation                   | Name      | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |           | 1001 | 12012 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMP       | 1001 | 12012 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_EMPNO | 1001 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("EMPNO"=1)
Statistiken
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
        139 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      30550 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1250 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         67 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
       1001 rows processed
SQL>The cost using the index range scan is now 5. WHile the FTS is still 3. Therefore the CBO prefers to use the FTS.

Can we create LOV using free hand sql with out hardcoding

Hi gurus,
Dear All,
For some of the reporst we don't have universe, so we use to get the report with the help of free hand sql,
but here I have to hardcode the list of values by using @prompt, but instead of hardcoding is there any ways to get the list of vaues by using @prompt, if then can any one help me out.

Yes and no.
When we use a LOV in a universe, the SQL is generated from the object definition. With Free Hand SQL (FHS) there is no universe. However...
If you create a very simple universe to host your LOV, and then reuse the same prompt text in your FHS then you can fake the LOV. This is not a great solution, but to be honest, FHS is never really a solution that I would consider. You might consider using Crystal to replace Deski in these cases.

Not Converted : Free-hand SQL connection problem

While converting a Free Hand SQL report from Desktop Intelligence to Web Intelligence report in BI XI 3.1, I am faced with the problem
Not Converted : <REPNAME> - Free-hand SQL connection problem
It is be noted that there are some other Free Hand SQL Reports, that go converted and published without any error. The subject report has two Data Providers; one referring to the Universe and other from the Free Hand SQL tagged to a DB Connection

Ajay,
Some more points that can be of consideration to you to help understand my problems.
The conversion from DeskI to WebI is in the same version BI XI 3.1 and not to BI 4.0 in which Free Hand SQLs is not supported.
I have converted one other Free Hand SQL Report with an error "Partially Converted : <REPNAME2> - Conditional or permanent Hide Header not available in Web Intelligence", for which I had to edit the report in InfoView and un-tick the "Show When Empty" property of the table ( http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?t=197157&view=next&sid=e6840aafa2d1267c66dae164d1dbf9db ). I think the solution mentioned in this link does not meet the purpose as the table is not displayed in the design time after the above untick.
Coming back to our issue, further probing into this aspect I stumbled upon this link meant for RCT for BI 4.0 version
https://csdwportal.dhhs.state.nc.us/downloads/Business%20Objects%20XI%20R4.0%20Docs/SAP%20BusinessObjects%20Report%20Con…
where in Section 3.4.9, there is a mention of the limitation in conversion as under
"Conversion of reports with free-hand SQL or stored procedures is only possible in Connected mode, since the Report Conversion Tool needs to use the secured connection to the database that is saved in the CMS."
I want to how the secured connection to the database in REPNAME2 is different from the subject report REPNAME1 as REPNAME2 got partially converted. The error reported for Subject report is "Free Hand SQL Connection Problem" and not conversion problem which can occur after the connection is established.
I did check the security properties of various FHSQL connections in the CMC and all of them are identical in nature.
Please advise

How to disable free hand sql option in deski stanadalone mode

I have a requirement where in i need to disable free hand sql option in deski standalone mode. Id this possible?
Regards,
AK

Hi Alok,
Kindly implement the following steps:
1. Logon to CMC > Applications > Desktop Intelligence > User Security.
2. Click on Add Principals and add the user account/user group to which you want to restrict the access > Add and Assign Security
3. If the account/group is already there, Click on Assign Security > Advanced > Add/Remove Rights
4. Select Advanced tab and click on 'Add or Remove rights'
5. Under Application, Click on Desktop Intelligence and deny the following rights.
Edit Free-hand SQL --> Denied
Use Free-hand SQL --> Denied
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Nakul Mehta

Problem in prompt value assignment in free hand SQL full client report in BO 6.5

Post Author: simarora
CA Forum: Desktop Intelligence Reporting
I automated the generation of reports using the perl, XML and java servlet. A perl script is invoked by a batch file , URL of BCA scheduler and name of XML file are passed as parameters to perl script. This perl script invokes a java servlet which reads the parameters from XML and pass them to BCA. BCA generates the reports and save the external formats to a specified location.
Two of the reports that are free hand SQL reports fail to generate saying that prompt value assignment failed. Not, sure whether it is due to free hand SQL / shared conenction or something else. I have tried assigning date prompt values in different formats and even in the same format that is set in report SQLs, but it always fails.
NOTE: When generated through BO, these free hand SQL reports got generated successfully without any issues and other reports that are based on Universe get generated by this automation / API without any issues.
Log messages are as below. Please take a look and advise:
Thu Jul 26 05:32:56 2007 INFO read xml file ./XML/ABC.xml Thu Jul 26 05:32:56 2007 INFO content dump of raw xml file:
<ReportingBatch><BroadcastAgent>ABCDEG</BroadcastAgent><BobjUser
name>POIUYT</BobjUsername><Documents><Document><DocumentName>Rank
ing
Report</DocumentName><DocumentType>rep</DocumentType><DocumentId
/><Domain>Domain1</Domain><DatePostFix>false</DatePostFix><Refres
hInNameOfRecipient>true</RefreshInNameOfRecipient><Prompts><Promp
t><PromptName>1. Select Business
Date:</PromptName><PromptValue>7/3/2007 12:00:00 AM</PromptValue></Prompt><Prompt><PromptName>2. Select Cluster:</PromptName><PromptValue>US Interest Rate Products</PromptValue></Prompt></Prompts><Actions><Action>refres
h</Action><Action>ftp</Action><Action>pdf</Action></Actions><Grou
ps><Group>ABC</Group></Groups><FtpServers><FtpServer><Name>Server
1</Name><UserName>user1</UserName><Password>password</Password><D
irectory>/Reports/ABC</Directory></FtpServer></FtpServers><Emails
><Email><Subject>Test</Subject><Body>Test</Body><FromAddress>
email@removed
</FromAddress><Attachments><Attachment>pdf</Attachment></Attachm
ents><Destinations><DestinationTo> email@removed
</DestinationTo></Destinations></Email></Emails></Document></Doc
uments></ReportingBatch>
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 FAIL Return Code For ./XML/ABC.xml : -1
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
BeginningProcessingofbatchfeedonservlet.........
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
INFO%3AAttemptingtocreatea+session
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
INFO%3ARetrievedWebiServerObject
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
INFO%3AValidsessionopenedforuseruser1
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
INFO%3ASessionandContextretrieved.
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO INFO%3ADocumentRanking
Report%2CBeginprocessing******************
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
INFO%3AThisisaFull-Clientreportforin-lineprcessing
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO
INFO%3ADocumenthasbeenopened+successfully
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO ERROR%3ARanking Report%2CExceptionraisedduringprocessingWebIntelligence+SDK
%2FJSPException-Number%3A1410+-javaError%3AWISDKSpe
cificException---Description%3APromptrequiredtoaccess+thi
s+document.
Thu Jul 26 05:33:07 2007 INFO INFO%3A+Ranking
Report%2CEndprocessing******************

Hi David, this is a difficult taks to answer all these questions in a forum. I suggest if you have valid SAP support you log a case for each issue and BO support will assist.

Using Decode in where clause in free hand sql

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for