Using image stabilization in FCE

Can anyone help me with using the image stabilization filter in FCE. I have some pretty shaky ski footage I would like to eliminate the shake if all possible.

Hi
If You are using FinalCut 3.5.1 the ImageStabilazion is near OK.
Previous versions a joke.
In FCE 4 it's omitted.
Yes in FCE 3.5.1 it works but the result isn't impressing.
You set a high contrast spot as reference (eg a candle flame, lamp etc.) and the area that it moves around in.
Then render - a hourly task - take a walk, dinner and sleep and it will eventually
reach end.
In FinalCut Pro - There is SteadyCamera - This works more Pro like but here it
does not only calculate sequence on TimeLine but the whole material so one has to
do the Import/Capture right from beginning. eg 30 sec clip (30 min material) was
estimated to about 40 hours rendering.
Alt. is to use a Plug-in to FinalCut Express 4 - fxStabilizer™ (Google it).
also avaliable to iMovie HD 6 where it does a fairly good job - slight sharpness loss
In iMovie'09 - Well we have to see. Won't we ?
Yours Bengt W

Similar Messages

IMovie image stabilization and FCE 4.0

I imported some video in Imovie in order to stabilize the video. I'm so shaky without a tripod.
Anyway once all the clips have been detected for stabilization what do i do to get that into FCE? Do i have to export each file or can i do a makeshift sequence then save as an FCE file? Does it bring in the image stabilzation with it if i do it that way.

You can either export it as an XML file for use within FCE or as a separate Quicktime file. The Quicktime approach is the most foolproof, as FCE will simply treat it as another video file.

Multicam Clips in the Timeline and Image Stabilization

I've got a multicam clip in my timeline that I would like to use image stabilization on. What I'd like to do is:
double click on the clip which brings up the angle editor with the range and angle selected.
press cmd-B to blade the clip
turn on image stabilization.
Unfortunately, step one doesn't work. I'm forced to open up the angle editor and manually skim and search for the desired angle and time range. It would be okay if the playhead in the angle editor was slaved to the one in the timeline. Then when you went into the angle editor you'd be right at the desired source material, but no, the two seem to be independant of each other. It makes performing the task much slower and more tedious. So much so I am convinced more experienced users are going to know a quicker way to do it.
So, does anyone know an easier work-around for this?

Thank you Tom and Luis, but I'm not with any of this. I can add a clip to the timeline or insert a clip into it via the "arrow tools". If I attempt to shorten the clip IN the timeline there is a blank space representing the amount trimmed from the clip.
I want the next clip along to that I've trimmed to automatically move along the timeline albeit shortening the total project duration.
Pressing "A" on the keyboard doesn't achieve this.
I simply click on the clip in the timeline to highlight it with the yellow margin. I then click on one "edge" with the arrows symbol and drag the edge inwards. This then leaves the space I do not want.
As for "Preferences" when I click this under "Final Cut Pro" i see nothing either relevant to this problem or that I could trash.

Image stabilization setting by itself

I've got a strange problem in iMovie 9.0.2. I've done a picture in picture for a number of stills. I quit out of the project and then re-opened it the next day and all the PIP's have image stabilization applied to them with max zoom set to 105% with a little hand symbol inside each PIP. I don't quite understand why this happened, seems more and more like iMovie 9 (iLife 11) has a mind of it's own as I use it more and more. I didn't apply this, it just happened by itself.
So the question is, what is the image stabiliztion for -- the PIP or the still itself which is behind the PIP? Is there an advantage to using image stabilization? I've seen some people say it doesn't smooth the image out but does the opposite. I don't understand the max zoom relationship to image stabilization.

Can't tell you why it suddenly set itself, that seems odd. But the mechanism it uses to 'stabilize' video is to zoom into the video frame (cutting out stuff around the edges) then it tries to tilt the video frame left and right to keep everything oriented properly. That's why it has been zoomed in to the 105% level. It only really works for High Def video frames that already have a lot of extra space to work with and if the subject in the frame isn't in a very tight closeup but has a good deal of empty, 'whitespace' around it.

IMovie shuts down at the end of image stabilization of a clip.

shuts down each time I use image stabilization for a clip......at the end of the process......

i have no idea how to fix this problem

5.1's Image Stabilizer

G'day,
When using Image Stabilizer in FCP5.1, am I right in thinking that it's not just a matter of adding a keyframe at the beginning and end of the clip, and positioning the sample square in a suitably contrasty area (the same spot for both keyframes)?
Instead I need to go through the entire clip, adding keyframes as the sample square deviates away from the chosen selected area?
The instructions in the manual aren't exactly a step by step... and I've just used the Motion tab's Centre option manually before to achive this result...
cheers
cosmic

well motion 4 (which comes with fcp7) does an incredible job of stabilizing video. I recently had an edit rejected because the clients didn't like the hand held footage. Not sure they understood what hand held footage looked like to begin with. I took it into motion and made the material look like it was shot on a tripod. And the edit was then accepted.
Motion 5 is available on the app store and might be worth investigating to stabilize your material. It's only $ 50.00. Just make sure your computer has the specs to run it.

I have just bought a new Imac and it will not load my copy of FCE 3.5 as it says "PowerPC applications are no longer supported". So how do I get to use the version of FCE I am used to and have paid for ?

I have just bought a new Imac and it will not load my copy of FCE 3.5 as it says "PowerPC applications are no longer supported". So how do I get to use the version of FCE I am used to and have paid for ?

I do not have any experience with Final Cut, but if you have existing projects that you MUST access; then you are in need of a solution on your new iMac in Mountain Lion!
Unfortunately you got caught up in the minor miracle of Rosetta. Originally licensed by Apple when it migrated from the PowerPC CPU platform that it had used from the mid-1990's until the Intel CPU platform in 2006, Rosetta allowed Mac users to continue to use their library of PPC software transparently in emulation.
However, Apple's license to continue to use this technology expired with new releases of OS X commencing with Lion (and now Mountain Lion). While educational efforts have been made over the last 6 years, the fact is that Rosetta was SO successful that many users were caught unaware UNTIL they upgraded to Lion or Mountain Lion.
Workarounds:
1. Purchase a used Mac that will run Snow Leopard (with the optional Rosetta installed) and continue to run FCE on that Mac (you can actually use Screen Sharing with a "headless" used Snow Leopard Mac Mini and use the 27" screen from your iMac to view and work FCE in the Mac Mini environment);
2. Upgrade to an Intel compatible version of FCE and hope it converts your existing projects to its newer format correctly. There is much debate that the newer version of Final Cut are eliminating many needed features; for example Final Cut Pro X vs. Final Cut Pro 6 -- many users are staying with version 6;
3. Install Snow Leopard (with Rosetta) into Parallels and then install FCE in the Snow Leopard environment:
[click on image to enlarge]
Full Snow Leopard installation instructions here:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1365439
NOTE: STEP ONE of the instructions must currently be completed on a Snow Leopard or Lion Mac and the resulting modified Snow Leopard.cdr install file can then be moved over to your Mountain Lion Mac for completion of the remaining steps.
NOTE 2: Computer games with complex, 3D or fast motion graphics make not work well or at all in virtualization.

Using images in Spry menus

Can someone please point me to instructions on how to incorporate button images in horizontal Spry menus?

Here's the working model for the menu I created using images for the main menu tabs: http://mmfc.org/HomePage_CleanUp/index_working.html. And here is the style sheet: http://mmfc.org/HomePage_CleanUp/SpryAssets/working.css.
I have one remaining problem, and hope someone can help.
There are three states/images for the main menu tabs: normal state, hover state (when the cursor is over the tab), and visible state (when a submenu is open and the cursor is over a submenu item).
In OS10.6.4/Safari, it works correctly:
Normal state
Hover state
Visible state
In Windows XP/IE 6, the 3rd state works incorrectly -- the hover state doesn't get replaced by the visible state:
In OS10.6.4/Opera and OS10.6.4/Firefox, it also works incorrectly -- but this time the hover state gets replaced by the hover color, not the visible state image:
For reference, I've copied the CSS below.
@charset "UTF-8";
/* SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css - Revision: Spry Preview Release 1.4 */
/* Copyright (c) 2006. Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved. */
LAYOUT INFORMATION: describes box model, positioning, z-order
/* The outermost container of the Menu Bar, an auto width box with no margin or padding */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style-type: none;
font-size: 100%;
cursor: default;
float: right;
/* Set the active Menu Bar with this class, currently setting z-index to accomodate IE rendering bug: http://therealcrisp.xs4all.nl/meuk/IE-zindexbug.html */
ul.MenuBarActive {
z-index: 1000;
/* Menu item containers, position children relative to this container and are a fixed width */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style-type: none;
font-size: 100%;
position: relative;
text-align: left;
cursor: pointer;
width: auto;
float: left;
/* Submenus should appear below their parent (top: 0) with a higher z-index, but they are initially off the left side of the screen (-1000em) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style-type: none;
font-size: 100%;
z-index: 1020;
cursor: default;
width: auto;
position: absolute;
left: -1000em;
background-color: #FDE9BB;
/* Submenu that is showing with class designation MenuBarSubmenuVisible, we set left to auto so it comes onto the screen below its parent menu item */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul.MenuBarSubmenuVisible {
left: auto;
/* Menu item containers are variable width according to submenu item text */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul li {
width: auto;
/* Submenus should appear slightly overlapping to the right (95%) and up (-5%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul ul {
position: absolute;
margin: -5% 0 0 95%;
/* Submenu that is showing with class designation MenuBarSubmenuVisible, we set left to 0 so it comes onto the screen */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul.MenuBarSubmenuVisible ul.MenuBarSubmenuVisible {
left: auto;
top: 0;
DESIGN INFORMATION: describes color scheme, borders, fonts
/* No borders on all sides */
/* ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul
border: 1px solid #666666;
/* Menu items are a light colored block with no padding and no text decoration */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a {
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
white-space: nowrap;
text-decoration: none;
display: block;
cursor: pointer;
color: #000000;
padding-right: 0px;
padding-left: 0px;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
font-size: 11px;
/* For setting the background color of the spry menu you need to edit the background in the CSS pane. Click on the spry menu bar and then open up the CSS pane. Window > CSS Styles. There's a few CSS items that set the background by default. The "a" item sets the background for the items that don't have a dropdown and the MenuBarItemSubmenu sets the background for the items that have a dropdown. You can set the background to an image just like you would any other element in your HTML. */
/* The following selectors define images for the (orange) normal state of tabs */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #AboutUs {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_aboutus.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #Missions {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_missions.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #Help {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_help.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #NewsAndEvents {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_newsandevents.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #Media {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_media.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #PatientStories {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_patientstories.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a #ContactUs {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_contactus.gif);
/* The following selectors define images for the (bright) active state of tabs.*/
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #AboutUs, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #AboutUs, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #AboutUs {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_aboutus_vis.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #Missions, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #Missions, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #Missions {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_missions_vis.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #Help, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #Help, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #Help {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_help_vis.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #NewsAndEvents, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #NewsAndEvents, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #NewsAndEvents {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_newsandevents_vis.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #Media, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #Media, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #Media {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_media_vis.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #PatientStories, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #PatientStories, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #PatientStories {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_patientstories_vis.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover #ContactUs, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover #ContactUs, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible #ContactUs {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_contactus_vis.gif);
/* The following selectors define images for the (red) hover state of tabs.*/
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #AboutUs, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #AboutUs {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_aboutus_hover.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #Missions, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #Missions {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_missions_hover.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #Help, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #Help {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_help_hover.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #NewsAndEvents, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #NewsAndEvents {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_newsandevents_hover.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #Media, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #Media {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_media_hover.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #PatientStories, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #PatientStories {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_patientstories_hover.gif);
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover #ContactUs, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus #ContactUs {
background-image: url(../img/DropDownMenu_contactus_hover.gif);
/* Menu items that have mouse over or focus have a dark background and white text */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:hover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a:focus {
background-color: #bf2e1a;
color: #FFFFFF;
/* Menu items that are open with submenus are set to MenuBarItemHover with a dark background and white text */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemHover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible {
background-color: #bf2e1a;
color: #FFFFFF;
/* Sets width of submenus and makes text non-wrapping */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul li {
display: block;
float: none;
width: 12em;
white-space: nowrap;
SUBMENU INDICATION: styles if there is a submenu under a given menu item
/* Menu items that have a submenu have the class designation MenuBarItemSubmenu and are set to use a background image positioned on the far left (95%) and centered vertically (50%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenu {
/* background-image: url(SpryMenuBarDown.gif); */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 95% 50%;
/* Menu items that have a submenu have the class designation MenuBarItemSubmenu and are set to use a background image positioned on the far left (95%) and centered vertically (50%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul a.MenuBarItemSubmenu {
/* background-image: url(SpryMenuBarRight.gif); */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 95% 50%;
/* Menu items that are open with submenus have the class designation MenuBarItemSubmenuHover and are set to use a "hover" background image positioned on the far left (95%) and centered vertically (50%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover {
/* background-image: url(SpryMenuBarDownHover.gif); */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 95% 50%;
/* Menu items that are open with submenus have the class designation MenuBarItemSubmenuHover and are set to use a "hover" background image positioned on the far left (95%) and centered vertically (50%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover {
/* background-image: url(SpryMenuBarRightHover.gif); */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 95% 50%;
BROWSER HACKS: the hacks below should not be changed unless you are an expert
/* HACK FOR IE: to make sure the sub menus show above form controls, we underlay each submenu with an iframe */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal iframe {
position: absolute;
z-index: 1010;
/* HACK FOR IE: to stabilize appearance of menu items; the slash in float is to keep IE 5.0 from parsing */
@media screen, projection {
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li.MenuBarItemIE {
display: inline;
/* f\loat: left;
background: #FFF; */

Image stabilization only works half the time and is not consistent

When I access image stabilization, apply, and render it. Only sometimes will it work. Help.

daveypr
It looks like you have come up with the answer to your particular situation. Great.
But, so that your experience can be of benefit to those finding your thread
a. What version of Premiere Elements are you using and on what computer operating system is it running?
b. How were you not applying the video stabilizer to the whole video clip in the first place? Or, are you suggesting
that others apply the video stabilizer to all the clips on the Timeline instead of one video clip that may really need that effect?
Thanks.
ATR

Can 5 axis image stabilization be engaged with non system lenses for A7II and A7rII?

Many people use/will use their excellent non system manual focus non system macro lenses on the A7II and undoubtedly on the soon to be released A7RII. Stabilization in the X/Y planes is very very important for macro. Sony on the A7II only stablizes the X/Y planes for lenses that report the focus distance as best I can tell. Perhaps the lens compensation app or another can be modified so this data can be manually inputted or even change the firmware to allow this and thus stabilize all 5 axes. Focal length will need to be inputted of course as well. Perhaps there is another way around this that I have missed. Thanks for any comments.

Thank you for taking the time to answer. I have done more digging in reviews and recalled sony's announcments which implied on 3 axis IS is available w/o a lens that reports focsing distance. Not my favorite source, but review from PCMag: "If you're using a non-native lens, or even a native manual focus lens like the Zeiss Loxia 2/50, it's stabilized along three axes—yaw, pitch, and roll. There's a technical reason for that. In order to compensate along the x and y axes, the camera needs to know the distance to the subject, which requires electronic communication of the focal distance from the lens to the body. To compensate for the other three axes, the only data that needs to be transmitted is the focal length of the lens. Even if you're using a purely mechanical Leica lensit can be stabilized—you're able to manually enter the focal length via a menu. The only real downside to this is that the A7 II does not add that focal length to the recorded EXIF data, so if you like to track which lens a shot is captured with, you'll need to take notes." http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2475439,00.asp A friend informed me that on his A7II he must mount a non OSS Sony lens first to have any image stabilization with any of his totally manual lenses--seems the camera saves the settings of the last lens attached. Turning the cam off doesn't reset this--very odd---seems to be a bug in the firmware. I hope the A7rII is different. This whole issue is quite confusing. Appreciate any additonal clarification.

Allow 5 axis image stabilization for non system lenses in A7(r)II series

Many people use/will use their excellent non system manual focus non system macro lenses on the A7II and undoubtedly on the soon to be released A7RII. Stabilization in the X/Y planes is very very important for macro. Sony on the A7II only stablizes the X/Y planes for lenses that report the focus distance. Perhaps the lens compensation app can be modified so this data can be manually inputted or even change the firmware to allow this and thus stabilize all 5 axes. Focal length will need to be inputted of course as well. If the new field is left blank, no action is taken as not to affect users not interested in this feature. Olympus somehow allows all 5 axes to be stabilized just by putting in the focal length but it is not clear how they pull that off. Thank you for considering this.

Thank you for taking the time to answer. I have done more digging in reviews and recalled sony's announcments which implied on 3 axis IS is available w/o a lens that reports focsing distance. Not my favorite source, but review from PCMag: "If you're using a non-native lens, or even a native manual focus lens like the Zeiss Loxia 2/50, it's stabilized along three axes—yaw, pitch, and roll. There's a technical reason for that. In order to compensate along the x and y axes, the camera needs to know the distance to the subject, which requires electronic communication of the focal distance from the lens to the body. To compensate for the other three axes, the only data that needs to be transmitted is the focal length of the lens. Even if you're using a purely mechanical Leica lensit can be stabilized—you're able to manually enter the focal length via a menu. The only real downside to this is that the A7 II does not add that focal length to the recorded EXIF data, so if you like to track which lens a shot is captured with, you'll need to take notes." http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2475439,00.asp A friend informed me that on his A7II he must mount a non OSS Sony lens first to have any image stabilization with any of his totally manual lenses--seems the camera saves the settings of the last lens attached. Turning the cam off doesn't reset this--very odd---seems to be a bug in the firmware. I hope the A7rII is different. This whole issue is quite confusing. Appreciate any additonal clarification.

Sony TG5V vs Sanyo Xacti HD1010: A QUESTION ABOUT IMAGE STABILIZATION

i have decided to return my new Sony TG5V handycam since discovering that it does not have an external mic jack for interviews that I plan on doing. The return will not be a problem, but my new question is this:
I did some preliminary research last night and found that the Sanyo Xacti HD1010 is very similar to the Sony TG5V, and it/the Xacti HD1010 does indeed have an external mic jack, so that solves the microphone requirement.
Reviews have said, however, that the Sanyo HA1010 has poor IS (Image Stabilization) and that in fact, the Sony TG5V has a much better IS. I even saw some comparisons, and it is obvious that the Sony stabilizes better.
HOWEVER: *Since I am going to edit with iMovie '09, which has a fine Image Stabilizer/Non Shake feature, would that make up for the bad shake in the raw footage?* More precisely: Would the same footage I shoot come out just as smooth with the Sanyo Xacti HD1010 with poor IS as it would come out with my Sonya TG5V and the iMovie '09 Image Stabiizer, working double time, so to speak?
And also: I am still looking for a small, lightweight videocam that I can carry in my purse. I do not need or want a larger one. I have a larger Sony that I never use. I welcome any suggestions.
Thank you.
~L

I just bought an Xacti HD2000, convinced by what now seems to be pure "hype" about much more rapid transfer and editing in iMovie but don't see any improvement over my Canon HG20 which ricords in AVCHD. In any case, iFrame is 30fps. Sanyo made a big pitch about Xacti, iFrame and the Mac but turns out all the software and the manuals are about Windows. My requests for assistance of Sanyo got zero results, after the automated response. If you want I'll sell you my Xacti.

Camileo S10 Camera does not remember the image-stabilizer setting

Hello Forum reader,
Is it normal that my Camileo S10 Camera does not remember the image-stabilizer setting?
I mostly use the 720px setting and stablilizer on, but after the camera is turned off the stabilizer is off again.
Greetzz.. Ben

Hi
This might be possible.
I remember that the focus does not work if the stabilization has been enabled
So maybe its an intention of the manufacturer that the stabilizer would be disabled again.
Greets

Image Stabilizer for iMovieHD6 and OSX10.8.5?

I have a lot of 'wobbly' videos (Iknow I SHOULD use a tripod but these clips are when I've been filming while walking about) and the only one I've seen is by GeeThree Slick, but the problem is that it won't work with OSX10.8.5. as shown below:
I emailed them to ask if they would upgrade it soon and their reply was as follows:
So because Apple have this nasty attitude of blocking third party apps, as shown above, I really need to get an editing stabilizer like the GeeThree one as an alternative.
Can anyone help me please?

I have got a tripod but, as I explained in my post, the wobbly clips are caused by the fact that I was filming while walking about so my tripod would not be any help in that situation anyway. As the problem already exists in the video, I'd like to correct it.
Re your comment about me 'moaning', it's because (copy of information from GeeThree):
Slick Transitions and Effects
Volume Eight
Slick Stabilize
Amazing image stabilization takes out the shakes and jitters from your video. (does not work with Mac OS X 10.7 or later).
So there you have it 'Slick Stabilize does not work with Mac OSX 10.7 or later'. My second 'moan' refers to their reply about updating it (quote from GeeThree's email reply):
Hello,
Unfortunately there is no plan to update the Stabilizer plug-in for Mac OS X 10.7 or later. Since Apple closed the door for us to continue to develop plug-ins, we no longer have the resources to update plug-ins from iMovie HD 6 to the most recent versions of OS X.
Best Regards,
GeeThree Slick Team
For some reason my jpeg files cannot be seen as they would make everything clear about my complaints being justified. You say 'Apple do nothing of the kind', so why does GeeThree say Apple have closed the door to them?

Image stabilization question...

I have use the image stabilization in Motion and found it very good.
I have also got AE CS3 (Windows) which does not have a good comparitive image stabilization.
What 3rd party plug in should I buy for AE that would do a good job?
(At the moment I am testing out Mocha but the trial version would let me export more than 10 frames !!! So, I can't really tell what a good overall job its done?)
ps: I know its an Apple forum,but I know a lot of users here also have AE and would like to help me out)

You might have better luck at Creative Cow. Lot of AE users hang out there.
Andy

Using image stabilization in FCE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for