Using JConsole to Change Logger Level at runtime

Is it possible to use JConsole to change Java's Logger logging level at runtime?
If so could someone tell me how I could go about doing this?
Thanks,

Never mind, found a nice site to help out for this.
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/jconsole.html

Similar Messages

Change log level at runtime

Is there any way to change a logger's level at runtime?
I would like to change between INFO and DEBUG on some features I'm working on without restarting Kura.
Thanks

I know this feature has been added again, but its accessible only through OSGi console. I developed a simple web interface to change log levels at runtime.
I uploaded the project on my github page. It compiles with Maven 3.0.5 as deployment package, you can install it on any running kura instance.
I find it very useful when developing/debugging, hope it may help someone else.

How to change log level in log4j at runtime

Hi,
I have a small requirement where the default log level is info, but if the user wants to invoke the Java program with debug level, the Debug should start off. I am trying to achieve this using this code..
          Logger root = Logger.getRootLogger();
          root.setLevel(Level.DEBUG);
          log.debug("This is debug");When I do this, the debug statement at the end does not print.
Then I thought may be the root logger level is not propagated after the initialization at start up, so I tried this
          log.setLevel(Level.DEBUG);
          log.info("This is info");
          log.debug("This is debug");
          log.info("Log level is " + log.getLevel());
          log.info(log.isDebugEnabled());The info statement prints "this is info" then the next info statement prints "log level is DEBUG" the next statement prints true but the intermediate debug statement does not print.
I have done this before in a Web app and it works just fine. I do not understand what is going on. Can someone please help me understand this.

I am not really familiar with Log4J, but in java.util.logging you define both a loglevel on the logger and the Handler that is actually responsible for outputting. A quick look on the Log4J sites shows that those are called 'appenders' in Log4J. So you might want to look if your appender is actually configured to output DEBUG-level statements.

Change item level security using wwsbr_api.modify_item

Hi.
Im using wwsbr_api.modify_item for change item level security.
Its code for change type access for item of my procedure
l_masterid := portal30.wwsbr_api.modify_item(
p_master_item_id => 7061,
p_item_id => 7062,
p_caid => 136,
p_folder_id => 1,
p_display_name => 'test',
p_region_id => 5,
p_access_level => portal30.wwsbr_api.item_access,
p_text => 'test change item security',
p_addnewversion => true, -- My content area have item versioning
level is audit
After execute my procedure access type = folder.
I see in wwv_things table new record
masterthingid = 7061,
id = 7064,
security = 'folder'
How to change item level security programmatically?
Thanks

Jerry,
Please forgive me for persisting with this, and thankyou for your continued patience, but let me try to explain the issue I'm having in another way...
I have a function that calls wwsbr_api.modify_item to change, say, the description. In this case "description" is the one and only thing I want to change about the item. As you've described above, I am able to query most things associated with the item (via wwsbr_all_items, wwsec_api.grantee_list, etc) so that I can pass current values to the wwsbr_api.modify parameters. However, I haven't found a way to query the current level of access control for a given item (i.e. wether it is currently set to ITEM_ACCESS, FOLDER_ACCESS, or null). As documented, I can force the item to be ITEM_ACCESS or FOLDER_ACCESS. However, I don't want to force a value and as we have concluded, passing null will nullify the current state.
So, in summary, an answer to this question will solve my problem:
Is it possible to query the current access control level of an item (either directly via one of the published views or indirectly via one of the views)?
If the answer is yes - great that solves my problem. How please?!?!?
If the answer is no - this must be a bug is it would mean that it isn't possible to use wwsbr_api.modify_item without inadvertently altering the current access control level of the item.
Again thanks for your patience...
Mark

Granularity of change rules in CDC (using Oracle streams) at columns level.

Is it possible to implement granularity of change rules in CDC (using Oracle streams) at columns level.
E.g. table abc with columns a1, b1, c1 where c1 is some kind of auditing column. I want to use CDC on table abc but want to ignore changes on c1.
Is it possible? My other option is to split table abc into a child table that has the Primary key and c1 only but it needs additional table and joins.
Thanks
Shyam

The requirement can be implemented by a simple trigger.
You seem to plan to kill a mosquito by using a nuclear bomb.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Can I use User Exit u2013 IWOC0004 u2013 Change Single-Level List for TCODE IW37N?

Hi All,
Can I use User Exit u2013 IWOC0004 u2013 Change Single-Level List for TCODE IW37N?
In documentation of the User Exit I can see that I can use this user Exit for IW37(Program - RIAFVC20) , but I want to use this for IW37N (RIH_ORDER_OPERATION_LIST).
Please tell me is it possible.
With best regards,
Narendra

Hi Pete Sir,
I am on 4.7 , how to work with it. I am going to use screen exit IW0110018 and I want to add User fields in the IW37N.
Thanks with best regards,
Narendra

Unused log file using FileHandler for two Logger

Hi,
I'm having some troubles with the using java.util.logging classes. To demontrate my problem I prepared the following code:
package org.prove.system;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
public class Child
     private static final Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger("org.prove.system");
     public static void main(String[] args)
          Child.LOG.info("I'm ready too!!!");
package org.prove.logging;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.logging.FileHandler;
public class ParentFileHandler extends FileHandler {
     public ParentFileHandler() throws IOException, SecurityException {
          super();
package org.prove.logging;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.logging.FileHandler;
public class ChildFileHandler extends FileHandler {
     public ChildFileHandler() throws IOException, SecurityException {
          super();
}and the following is the configuration inside my logging.properties file
# Loggers configuration
org.prove.handlers = org.prove.logging.ParentFileHandler
org.prove.level = ALL
org.prove.useParentHandlers = false
org.prove.system.handlers = org.prove.logging.ChildFileHandler
org.prove.system.level = ALL
org.prove.logging.ParentFileHandler.pattern = %h/logs/Parent.%u.log
org.prove.logging.ParentFileHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
org.prove.logging.ParentFileHandler.append = true
org.prove.logging.ChildFileHandler.pattern = %h/logs/Child.%u.log
org.prove.logging.ChildFileHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
org.prove.logging.ChildFileHandler.append = trueNow, if you try my example you can find, inside the "logs" directory specified in the configuration file, some files:
- Child.0.log, which is the file for the org.prove.logging.ChildFileHandler;
- Parent.0.log, which is the file for the org.prove.logging.ParentFileHandler.
but you can also find:
- Parent.1.log;
- Parent.1.log.lck.
In particular the last two files are generated by the initialization of the org.prove.logging.ParentFileHandler, because inside the method addLogger of the LogManager class, after the initialization of the demanded logger there is a cycle to identify the parent of the logger itself.
Inside that cycle is invoked again the method demandLogger that, if not already initialized, creates the Logger, and after instantiates the handlers of that logger, generating the Parent.1.log and its lock file Parent.1.log.lck. This files are not used and at the end of the execution the lock file is not deleted as the others.
I hope my problem is clear and someone can help me to identify how to resolve it.
Thanks in advance
Alessandro Cristiani

It is not possible to redirect the two different type of logs by using same log level. you have to use to different log levels for both and then in your code you have to mark specifically.
to do this you can use log levels ERROR (for exceptions) and FATAL (for errors).
First define your own logger class that will be using the log4j API's
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
public class MyLogger {
   static Logger log = Logger.getLogger(MyLogger.class);
   public static logThrowable(Throwable th){
       if(th instanceof Exception) {
          log.error(th.getMessage());
       } else {
           log.fatal(th.getMessage());
}and for your log4j.xml
change the level for your ERROR_FILE to FATAL
in your LogExample
remove:
static Logger log = Logger.getLogger(LogExample.class);change:
}catch(Exception e){
log.error("Exception e");
}to
}catch(Throwable e){
MyLogger.logThrowable(e);
}Hope this helps. Or if you do not want to do in this way then you can also create your own log levels. It is not advisable but you can certainly do that.
Please visit [Log4j Manual|http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/manual.html] for more on this.

Best Practice: Dynamically changing Item-Level permissions?

Hi all,
Can you share your opinion on the best practice for Dynamically changing item permissions?
For example, given this scenario:
Item Creator can create an initial item.
After item creator creates, the item becomes read-only for him. Other users can create, but they can only see their own entries (Created by).
At any point in time, other users can be given Read access (or any other access) by an Administrator to a specific item.
The item is then given edit permission to a Reviewer and Approver. Reviewers can only edit, and Approvers can only approve.
After the item has been reviewed, the item becomes read-only to everyone.
I read that there is only a specific number of unique permissions for a List / Library before performance issues start to set in. Given the requirements above, it looks like item-level permission is unavoidable.
Do you have certain ideas how best to go with this?
Thank you!

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to change item level permission.
There is no out of the box way to accomplish this with SharePoint.
You can create a custom permission level using Visual Studio to allow users to add & view items, but not edit permission.
Then create a group with the custom permission level. The users in this group would have the permission of create & add permission, but they could no edit the item.
In the CodePlex, there is a custom workflow activities, but by default it only have four permission level:
Full Control , Design ,Contribute and Read.
You should also customize some permission levels for your scenario.
What’s more, when use the SharePoint 2013 designer, you should only use the 2010 platform to create the workflow using this activities,
https://spdactivities.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Grant%20Permission%20on%20Item
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

Change the level of isolation in a Informix connection

Post Author: mibarz
CA Forum: Data Integration
Iu2019m working over informix and I need to change de level of isolation befor make a Query.
The Informix instruction is SET ISOLATION TO DIRTY READ. In the Data flow we are using the SQL statement object for retrieve the data.
I try to change the level of isolation in the ODBC configuration, but its impossible.
¿Anybody can help me with this problem?
Thanks,
Martí

Post Author: bhofmans
CA Forum: Data Integration
Unfortunately this is not possible in Data Integrator today. We have several enhancement requests for this and similar functionality for several RDBMS. For MSSQL server a workaround is provided via a DSConfig parameter, for other RDBMS we don't have a solution yet.

Dont allow to change item level data in sales order.

Hi all,
I have a requirement in which, users should not be allowed to change item level data or not allowed to add any new items in sales order on a certain condition. But they should be allowed to change the header level data.
How can i achieve this.
Can anyone help me?

Hi,
Check below exit.
MV45AFZZ and in form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP.
Here check for ur validation, If passes then CHECK variable SVBAP-TABIX. If it is 0 then item is created. If it is GT 0 then item is changed. Other way could be...
select data from VBAP for each sales document and item in xvbpa internal table.
If for any item u don't have data in VBAP table that means u r adding that item. So issue error message.
*       FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP                              *
*       This userexit can be used to move some fields into the sales *
*       dokument item workaerea VBAP                                  *
*       SVBAP-TABIX = 0: Create item                                 *
*       SVBAP-TABIX > 0: Change item                                 *
*       This form is called at the end of form VBAP_FUELLEN.          *
Thanks,
Vinod.

Issue with changing database location at runtime

I am having a similar issue to:
Re: Issue with changing database location at runtime
where I am using Crystal Reports 2008 SP 3 fix pack 3.3 and a OLE DB connection to a SQL 2008 R2 server. Running on a computer on the network where the report can see the original development server is fast, other computers where that server is not available are hanging 20 seconds before coming up.
I am using the same code from the Crystal Sample app to change the connection on each table. I found that the slowness comes the first time the ReportDocument object is accessed to get the collection of database tables, before the connection info is set.
Fix pack 3.4 was mentioned in that post. Does fix pack 3.4 fix that issue? I don't see fix pack 3.4 on the downloads page (https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap%28bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==%29/bc/bsp/spn/bobj_download/main.htm)

I just found on the reports that were having the issue there was a SQL Expression. Per this thread:
Re: Report load is slow after changing database servers
There was an issue with that and the fix is not out til the end of Feb so I found a way not to use the SQL Expression and the speed is much better.
However, your information provided led me to this post:
Cannot Change Table Location, but Only for One Report
And I am also experiencing an issue where the table location is not changing on one subreport and I will look into that as a possible solution.
Thanks so much for your help.

Changing Audio Levels

Good Morning,
I want to change the levels of audio within a single clip. I used to know how to set the points in the audio line, but for the life of me I can't remember how to do it.
Thanks for your help.
Andy

option-w will show keyframes in the timeline. You can then click on the pen tool (or hit p) to put in key frames directly in the track in the timeline. Shift-T will toggle thru different heights for the tracks in the timeline which can help you and doubleclicking of the audio clip in the timeline will load the clip in the viewer where adjusting keyframes can usually be done with greater ease and precision.

Cannot change Detail level of IMAP, SMTP, or Junk logs

I am running 10.4.7 Server and 10.4.7 version of Server Admin. When I go to the Mail -> Settings -> Logging Tab I cannot change the detail level. Or at least I can use the drop down menu, but when I press Save it either blanks out the drop down menus or just resets them back to their original levels.
Is there a command I can use to change the Logs detail level via command line? Thanks in advance.

changing log levels has been discussed here many times. use the search feature. if you have questions after you search, please post.

User exit to change item level data in purchase order

Hi,
Can anyone let me know the user exit to change item level data in purchase order . there is a badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for this but the issue is its method process_item gets triggered only when the item is changed. My requirment is
For purchase order document types u201CZSOu201D and u201CZCOu201D, where the purchase order is a u201CLimits Orderu201D only i.e. no materials or services on the purchase order, the print price indicator field should be set to u201Cblanku201D (unchecked). now i cant use ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST because process_item wont get triggered if there is no change in itemlevel data.
Regards,
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
Probably EXIT_SAPLMEKO_002.
hope it helps,
Edgar

Workflow for Changing Item Level Permission in SharePoint 2013 (Office365)

I am using OOTB Tasks List in SharePoint 2013 (O365). Now my scenario is like this:
I have two user groups: 1.Sales Managers 2. Sales Executives
Sales Managers can create & assign task to Executive. I want something like Sales Managers Can view all tasks (Which is by default view of tasks list i.e. perfact) but Executives can see only their tasks assigned to them. How can I achive this?
Can I use WorkFlow for this to Change item level permission or to assign permission to assigned to user? or JS
Can anyone have proper solution? thanks

1. make 2 SharePoint group 1>Sales Managers 2>Sales Executives
2. Show 2 WP of same task list in same page.
3. Use Audience Target for Sales Managers Sharepoint group in first Webpart property. (All
Iten view)
4. Show "My Task" view (assign to =[Me]) Bottom WP for same task list and use Audience Target for Sales Executives. Or if you want it to see
Sales Managers as well, the dont use any Audience Target.
Bottom line - SharePoint group use in Audience Target will do the trick. OOTB
Regards Sudip Misra [email protected] +1-412-237-5435 Pittsburgh, PA

Using JConsole to Change Logger Level at runtime

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for