Valuated SIT: Batch related error

Hi Experts
We use valuated SIT functionality.
The material moved is non-batch managed in supplying plant  and it is batch managed in receiving plant.
Due to this, when attempted to do PGI, getting the error "Enter Batch" (Message M7 018).
This error received due to the reason that during PGI, along with movement 683, movement 107 to get posted for placing in blocked stock.
Please sugges if any solution for this
Regards
ramSiva

please follow the instruction from OSS note 1835514 - SiT and batch management requirement only in receiving plant

Similar Messages

  • MM42 change material, split valuation at batch level, M301, locking table

    Dear All,
    I'm working on ECC 6.0 retail and I have activated split valuation at batch level.  Now in MBEW for this specific material I have almost 14.400 entries.
    If I try to change some material data (MM42) I receive an error message M3021 A system error has occurred while locking and then Lock table overflow.
    I used SM12 to see the table (while MM42 is still running) and it seems that MBEW is the problem.
    What should I do?  For any material modification the system has to modify every entry in MBEW? Is there any possibility to skip this?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Symptom
    Key word: Enqueue
    FM: A system error has occurred in the block handler
    Message in the syslog: lock table overflowed
    Other terms
    M3021 MM02 F5 288 F5288 FBRA
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The lock table has overflowed.
    Cause 1: Dimensions of the lock table are too small
    Cause 2: The update lags far behind or has shut down completely, so that the lock entries of the update requests that are not yet updated cause the lock table to overflow.
    Cause 3: Poor design of the application programs. A lock is issued for each object in an application program, for example a collective run with many objects.
    Solution
    Determine the cause:
    SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis (old)
    SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis (new)
    checks the effectiveness of the lock management
    SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis in update (old)
    SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis in update (new)
    checks the effectiveness of the lock management in conjunction with updates
    SM12 -> OkCode TEST -> Error handling -> Statistics (old, only in the enqueue server)
    SM12 -> Extras -> Statistics (new)
    shows the statistics of the lock management, including the previous maximum fill levels (peak usage) of the partial tables in the lock table
    If the owner table overflows, cause 2 generally applies.
    In the alert monitor (RZ20), an overrunning of the (customizable) high-water marks is detected and displayed as an alert reason.
    The size of the lock table can be set with the profile parameter u201Cenque/table_size =u201C. specifies the size of the lock table in kilobytes. The setting must be made in the profile of the enqueue server ( u2026_DVEBM.. ). The change only takes effect after the restart of the enqueue server.
    The default size is 500 KB in the Rel 3.1x implementation of the enqueue table. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
    Owner table: approx 560.
    Name table: approx 560.
    Entry table: approx 2240.
    As of Rel 4.xx the new implementation of the lock table takes effect.
    It can also be activated as described in note 75144 for the 3.1I kernel. The default size is 2000 KB. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
    Owner table: approx 5400
    Name table: approx 5400
    Entry table: approx 5400
    Example: with the
    u201Cenque/table_size =32000u2033 profile parameter, the size of the enqueue table is set to 32000 KB. The tables can then have approx 40,000 entries.
    Note that the above sizes and numbers depend on various factors such as the kernel release, patch number, platform, address length (32/64-bit), and character width (Ascii/Unicode). Use the statistics display in SM12 to check the actual capacity of the lock table.
    If cause 2 applies, an enlargement of the lock table only delays the overflow of the lock table, but it cannot generally be avoided.
    In this case you need to eliminate the update shutdown or accelerate the throughput of the update program using more update processes. Using CCMS (operation modes, see training BC120) the category of work processes can be switched at runtime, for example an interactive work process can be converted temporarily into an update process, to temporarily increase the throughput of the update.
    For cause 3, you should consider a tuning of the task function. Instead of issuing a large number of individual locks, it may be better to use generic locks (wildcard) to block a complete subarea. This will also allow you to considerably improve the performance.

  • An error occurred while executing batch. Error message is: There is not enough space on the disk.

    Hello all,
    I execute a T-SQL query, which will retrieve large amount of data, however, I get an error message after a few seconde.
    The error message is :
    An error occurred while executing batch. Error message is: There is not enough space on the disk.
    Who can tell me the reason and waht's the steps to solve this issue ?
    Really thanks.
    Thanks, Jed deng

    The other two posters suggested that the problem with tempdb or you data/log files. This is not the case here. The error message relates to the client-side of things. Apparently SSMS needs to store data on disk. I don't recall exactly when this happens,
    but I seem to recall that the files appear in you %TEMP% directory.
    I would suggest that your correct action is to clean up the disk. Not the least there may be a lot of junk in your %TEMP% and %TMP% directories.
    Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]
    Thanks Erland, I was not aware of this earlier. Now, I am able to find out one of the resons for slowness of SSMS gird. Also, I have just checked it with process monitor, SSMS is creating tmp%.tmp files..
    - Chintak (My Blog)

  • Batch inconsistency error & loss of data

    Hi All,
    Almost all of our SFG and FG materials are batch managed. Suddenly we are facing batch inconsistency error which was not there earlier.
    When production order confirmation is being done, batches are created and batch characteristics results are entered. But in many cases these batch values are not being updated in MCH1 table and we are facing batch inconsistency error. For example, during UD in Quality, batch inconsistency error is not allowing to pass the lot.
    We are rectifying this using BMCC, but the major issue is that after running the transaction all batch characteristics data are lost. So we have to re-enter the results again.
    The frequency of this error is too high now, almost 4/5 times a day. As we are approaching Go-Live very very soon, this has become a critical issue.
    Please help with suggestions to rectify the problem.
    Thanks in advance!

    I usually find inconsistencies to be related to specific characteristics, usually those with procedures or functions attached used to infer values or check values.  Are you using characteristics in this way at all on the batch?
    Is this a brand new system or are you going live with a new business into an existing SAP system?  Is there any chance any of the internal tables used by the batch data have been corrupted somehow?  The batch characteristic tables are more complicated than most, using a lot of internal pointers to link tables together.  If a conversion program or upload program mucked around directly in any of these tables, that could have caused significant problems in your tables. 
    I'd look to see first if I could find a commonality among the problem batches.  I.e a similar characteristic, or same group of classes involved.  Maybe the materials were created and classified on the the same day?  Something that would indicate the problem.  Computer bugs are never random.  They just often appear that way!!!
    FF

  • An Error Occurred While Processing Your Request We're sorry. While processing your request, we encountered a system-related error. Your request was not processed. Error ID Code: b7bc5afa-ce52-434b-bfb6-3fb086b77a23

    Every time i log out of my Bank email after getting a copy of transactions, I get the following:
    An Error Occurred While Processing Your Request
    We're sorry. While processing your request, we encountered a system-related error.
    Your request was not processed.
    Error ID Code: b7bc5afa-ce52-434b-bfb6-3fb086b77a23
    If the error continues or you need to contact support, please provide them with the Error ID Code above.
    That's what I am doing. contacting support.

    Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
    "Clear the Cache":
    * Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Offline Storage (Cache): "Clear Now"
    "Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
    * Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"

  • Split valuation with batch management and project stock

    Dear Gurus,
    I need to combine two following requirements:
    1. split valuation with batch management (valuation type = batch number)
    2. project stock
    These two functionalities work fine separately but not together.
    I receipt PO for material with spiit valuation on a batch level into a project stock. Posting is OK and material document (MSEG table) seems to be OK (batch number, valuation type and project stock are in this table). The problem appears when I want to display material in this valuation type (MM03) or batch (MSC3n). They don't exist!!!  Short investigation showed that during goods receipt table MBEW (valuated stock) was not updated with this valuation type.
    But If PO is receipt into normal stock first and then posted into project stock everything is OK.
    Have you had or heart about such issue? I would appreciate any sugestion. 
    Thsnks in advance.
    Marcin Bernat

    Hi,
    As you already know ,u are using project stock and doing goods receipt against project, stock table QBEW will be updated and not MBEW. MBEW only updates in case of plant stock valuation. If u receive any goods against project stock it does not contribute to plant stock. Irrespective whether your material is managed in split valuation or not, If it is received against project stock it only updates QBEW. There is no need to update MBEW, if u r using split valuation in project. QBEW also have valuation type as another level like MBEW. If u want to see material price for project stock, it can be  seen in QBEW -valuation type and not in mm03.
    As u r receiving goods against project stock this is d only reason QBEW is updated and not MBEW.
    QBEW will store all information like MBEW for batch number, valuation type and project stock assignment.
    Hope it answers your question.
    Deepak.

  • How to make site root-relative links work in DW and Server both?

    See details on buggy DW image link behavior, below. My question is:
    1) how to make site root-relative links work in DW and Server both? Or…
    2) how to reliably automate the change of several hundred legacy root-relative links of the form
    /images/image.jpg  to document-relative?
    That is, to
    ../images/image.jpg or
    ../../images/image.jpg or
    ../../../images/image.jpg etc…depending on where the directory is.
    The old format (/images/image.jpg ) used to work fine in my previous DW 8 configuration but appear grey in DW after “upgrading” to DW cs5.5 mac. (they look fine on the server, but it’s hard to edit image-heavy pages locally when they are all grey).
    I tried changing the files to how DW creates root relative links now:
    /public_html/images/image.jpg, which is a very easy, attractive root flow since there’s a one-to-one mapping. These look great in DW but are broken on the server!
    I looked at the “advanced” site setup, and it looked like it might be possible to nuke the /public_html/ part of my server info…but it also looked like there was the potential for doing damage changing these settings, which are automatically generated from our server connection settings, which seem to work.
    The “links relative to document/ site root” toggle…does that change how DW interprets existing links, or just change the default when you are adding a link?  I have made 80% of the file links document relative…before wondering if root-relative isn’t better?
    It sure seems less ambiguous for all those images if theres a way to make root relative work for DW design view, DW link check, and server.
    Summary of buggy behavior: (see test with images here)
    "old style" site root link
          /images/img_book/WScover120x150_NEW.jpg
          Design veiw in DW: broken (grey w/ broken icon)
          Link check in DW: "external link" (i.e., uncheckable, + file could appear orphaned)
          Browser: good
          Ease of switching: n/a (existing format)
    "new style" site root relative link
          /public_html/images/img_book/WScover120x150_NEW.jpg
          Design veiw in DW: good
          Link check in DW: good
          Browser: broken
          Ease of switching: easy
    Document relative link
          ../../images/img_book/WScover120x150_NEW.jpg
          Design veiw in DW: good
          Link check in DW: good
          Browser: good
          Ease of switching: hard (how to automate?)
    Absolute link
          http://www.oasisdesign.net/images/img_book/WScover120x150_NEW.jpg
          Design veiw in DW: broken (grey w/ broken icon)
          Link check in DW: external (i.e., uncheckable, + file could appear orphaned)
          Browser: good
          Ease of switching: n/a...not a real option
    Thanks!
    Similar discussion on "/"

    Hello again Jon!
    Thanks for jumping on this.
    All clear and understood about where publc_html is etc.
    No contemplation of nuking the actual public_html directory on the server, just the "/public_html" text string at the start of the DW-generated links.
    "/public_html" is automatically added to the front of the link in DW if I create the link with any of the GUI tools, if I have "site root relative" selected. And ""/public_html" ends up in the code, and gets uploaded that way to the server, where it (obviously) doesn't work.
    Doesn't sound like it is supposed to work this way. Also, what seems to be the usual root relative format (/images/image.jpg) shows as a broken link in the GUI and an external link in the DW link check. All this togther makes me thinkI have some obscure setting incorrect?
    The setting that caught my eye is manage sites/ site setup/ advance settings/ local info/ web url,  which is automatically set to http://www.oasisdesign.net/public_html/
    it gives an option to change it but it makes every effort to make this NOT look like something users should mess with:
    Having gone through the more careful thought process during this post, I'm ready to do the experiment of changing the remote server web URL (why is it wrong by default?)...think I'll eat dinner first so there's 45 min to avert disaster if anyone knows this to be a bad idea!
    Art
    PS--don't  have a local testing server...don't think this will solve the GUI broken link/ link shows as external problems.
    Is there an easy, automated way to change links sitewide from document to root relative?

  • Error while creating a product group--Batch input error 9

    Hi,
       While creating a product group in T-code MC84, getting the error message" Product group can not be created (Batch input error 9)". Would appreciate providing yr help to resolve above issue.
    Thks,
    Nilesh

    Hi Neel,
       As ponited by you, the material type "PROD" is realted with creation of product group.I am able to resolve the error, "actually the work schedulling & MRP views were not activated for "PROD" resulting in the above error.
      Thks for yr help.
    Regards,
    Nilesh

  • Certificate Related Error Message/Please Help

    Today I received an "Unable to verify SSL server pop.gmail.com" message on my Mail server. I transfer mail from gmail to Mail.
    "Mail was unable to verify the identity of this server, which has a certificate issued to "pop.gmail.com". The error was:
    The certificate for this server has expired.
    You might be connecting to a computer that is pretending to be "pop.gmail.com", and putting your confidential information at risk. Would you like to continue anyway?"
    In the lower box, it lists the Version, Serial Number, Issuer Name (which is from Zaire, Western Cape, and lists the organization as Thawte Consulting cc and other info, Subject name is Google Inc, common name is pop.gmail.com, then gives a Signature Algorithm, Parameters, etc.
    It won't let me Copy and Paste so I have not hit the Continue button for concern of losing that info for reference.
    I went to Help which instructed me to do the following:
    I'm getting a certificate-related error message
    If you get an error message with the word "certificate" in it, make a copy of the message and contact your Internet service provider (ISP) or network administrator. The error message may help them diagnose your problem.
    If your mail server uses a self-signed Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificate, each time you open Mail you'll see an error message stating that the certificate is not valid. You can continue, but you'll see the same message every time you open Mail. To stop seeing this message, you can permanently accept the certificate.
    To permanently accept a self-signed SSL certificate:
    Click the Show Certificate button in the error message.
    The certificate appears with a certificate icon in the upper-left corner.
    Hold down the Option key and drag the certificate icon to the desktop.
    Double-click the certificate icon on the desktop, and choose X.509 Anchors from the pop-up menu. Click Add.
    The certificate is permanently accepted.
    You must have permission to administer the computer for this procedure to work.
    For information about encryption, click "Tell me more."
    Instead of asking for the "580 Anchors" , it asked simply "Do you want to add the certificates from pop.gmail.com.cer to a keychain?"
    I clicked "Add"
    The pop.gmail.com certificate AND Thawte Freemail Member AND Thawte Personal Freemail certificates is now entered in my Keychain.
    There are no dates listed under "Created" or "Modified" for those certs under Keychain.
    IS THIS OK OR DO I HAVE A PROBLEM SINCE THESE THAWTE CERTS ARE LOCATED IN ZAIRE???
    IF IT IS A PROBLEM, HOW DO I FIX/CHANGE/OK/DELETE/MODIFY, ETC. IT? PLEASE BE CLEAR.
    CAN I/SHOULD I JUST DELETE ALL THREE/SOME OF THE CERTS NOW IN KEYCHAIN?
    WILL I STILL BE ABLE TO GET MAIL AS BEFORE THIS MESSAGE IF DELETE THE CERTS?
    I believe this is the first time I have received a message concerning certificates so I am naive concerning this.
    THANK YOU.

    I had similar gmail/cert problem yesterday - not for the first time!
    I deleted the prefs (user/library/preferences), deleted the gmail account (mail prefernces), ran applejack ( http://applejack.sourceforge.net/ ) & added the account from scratch.
    Annoying I know, and my inbox was 200+ emails but nobody seems to know what or why this happens (my previous post) http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=243186&tstart=0
    Perhaps this is related to certain emails (an email scam), i run 3 macs & the mail account on the affected machine receives my business email & this is the only machine the gmail/cert problem occurs.

  • Spilt valuation with batch management?

    Gurus,
    I want to activate split valuation with batch management..
    i know the configuration of doing split valuation..
    but, i need help on batch management configuration...

    hi,
    Why do you want both at the same time??
    Either split val. or batch management independently can solve your issues...
    Please let me know the reason...
    For split valuation :
    To select split valuation ('OMWC'), proceed as follows:
    1. Determine the valuation categories and valuation types that are allowed for all valuation areas:
    global valuation categories via menu "Goto --> Global Categories"
    global valuation types via menu "Goto --> Global Types"
    2. Allocate the valuation types to the valuation categories.
    a) Select "Goto --> Global Categories".
    b) Position the cursor on a valuation category and select
    "Goto --> Global Categories --> Assignments --> 'Types->Category'".
    c) Activate the valuation types you want.
    3. Determine the local valuation categories for each valuation area.
    a) Select "Goto --> Local definitions".
    b) Position the cursor on a valuation area and select
    "Goto --> Local Definitions --> Allocate Categoires->Org.units (button Cats->(OU)".
    You obtain a list of the global valuation categories.
    c) Activate the categories to be used in this valuation area.
    The system creates the local valuation types based on the allocations under point 2.
    Only now can you create a master record with split valuation.
    Specifying Split Valuation by creating Material Subject to Split Valuation
    1. Create a material master record, selecting the Accounting View 1.
    2. Enter your data as required on the Accounting data screen, specifying a valuation category.
    (If you can't find the valuation category field, it might be hidden, use OMSR to define the Field Groups.
    Look for the field MBEW-BWTTY for Valuation category).
    3. Be sure that the price control indicator is V for moving average price and enter a moving average price.
    4. In the case of split valuation, you can create only one valuation header record with price control V because the
    individual stock values are cumulated, and this total value is written to the valuation header record. This is where the
    individual stocks of a material are managed cumulatively. To do this, fill in the Valuation category field on the accounting
    screen when you create the material master record and leave the Valuation type field blank.
    5. Save your data and the system creates the valuation header record.
    6. The initial screen appears.
    7. Extend the material by creating new material master records from the Accounting view 1. For the first material, specify a
    valuation type in the Organizational Levels dialog box and enter the respective accounting data on the data screen.
    Proceed likewise for the other materials, distinguishing between them by valuation type. To do this, call up the material in
    creation mode again. Due to the fact that a valuation header record exists, the system requires you to enter a valuation
    type for the valuation category.
    8. Repeat step seven for every valuation type planned.
    You want to valuate the stock of material XYZ that you obtain from manufacturer A in Los Angeles at a different price than the stock you obtain from manufacturer B in Detroit. In this case, the valuation category is H for origin. Your valuation types can be LOS ANGELES and DETROIT.
    If a material is subject to split valuation, every quantity (sub-stock) of this material must be assigned to a valuation type (for example, country of origin).
    For every valuation type, there are two types of data in the system, as follows:
    Valuation data (for example, valuation price, total stock quantity, total stock value), which is defined for every valuation type at valuation-area level and applies to all dependent storage locations.
    Stock data, which, like batch data, is managed separately for each storage location. If a material that is subject to split valuation is also subject to management in batches, its stock data is not managed by valuation type, but rather by batch. Every batch is assigned to a valuation type.
    The stock quantity, stock value, and valuation price for all valuation types are managed cumulatively at valuation-area level
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Material maintained in split valuation and batch management

    Dear Seniors,
      I have maintained a material with both split valuation and batch management. If i check in MMBE, only batch management is getting preference. Valuation type is not coming. Why is it so ? why maintaining both is not possible in SAP ??? kindly explain me please.
    Regards,
    JanaMM

    If you  Mantain both Split valuation as well as batch mgmt for  a material, then  all stock  reports will show  "Batch "  and  Not valuation type  since  batch  is relevant to inventory  mgmt  and split valuation is relevant for account determination and valuation. ,  the only  report which  wil show you both  is BMBC(batch info cockpit).
    You  can however run MB5B  w.r.t  valuation type in the input screen.
    In such cases , The  Valuation Type  forms a part of the batch master which  you can see in MSC3N .

  • A strange Java related error occured when I tried to install a software

    When I tried to install Maple 12 on my PC, I got a Java-related error as follow:
    java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.swing.UIManager
         at javax.swing.JPanel.updateUI(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JPanel.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JPanel.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JPanel.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JRootPane.createGlassPane(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JRootPane.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JFrame.createRootPane(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JFrame.frameInit(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JFrame.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.g(DashoA10*..)
         at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.h(DashoA10*..)
         at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.a(DashoA10*..)
         at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.main(DashoA10*..)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at com.zerog.lax.LAX.launch(DashoA10*..)
         at com.zerog.lax.LAX.main(DashoA10*..)
    My OS is Windows XP Professional with SP3. However, I managed to install this version on a virtual machine (which also runs Windows XP SP3) therefore the problem does not come from the installer.
    What can I do now to install Maple 12? I really need this software...
    Thanks!
    Edited by: uhobasa on Sep 28, 2008 6:41 PM

    Did you find the solution for this problem? I am experiencing the same behavior trying to run Freemind.

  • Pro Ver 6 Batch Processing Error

    When running batch processing on .doc files, at the end of the run the batch processor errors and warnings window shows a "bad parameter" message for each document. But it does not say what the bad parameter is. I can successfully convert the same document manually, so not sure what to do. The log file is no help, as that just contains the same error messages. Running version 6.0.6 of Acrobat Pro, WinXP Pro and Office 2003. The documents are all single page Word files with an embedded .tif file. The manually converted .pdf files look fine.

    hi TAJ0808,
    there is a fix for it go and ask support we already have it installed.
    regards chris

  • Special stock T for valuated SIT

    Hi Experts
    The valuated SIT is referred with special stock indicstor T.
    But i am unable see the special stock indicator in MB52 as like consignment stock/subcontractor stock.
    Please give any clue.
    thanks
    ramSiva

    Hello,
    you can also see special stock T in MMBE. It´s necessary to add field KASIT to one of the Display version (you can customize it in path Material management --> Inventory Management --> Reporting --> Define Stock List Display --> Rules for display of stock balances).
    You can see final result in attached screen shot.
    To resume. You can analyze T special stock in:
    MBBS
    MB5SIT
    MMBE (customizing Display version with new stock type).
    Best regards.

  • [svn] 1978: Bug: vendors. properties file which is used in vendor specific login commands was not being read properly and as a result some login related error messages were not being displayed correctly .

    Revision: 1978
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-06-06 08:05:34 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jun 2008)
    Log Message:
    Bug: vendors.properties file which is used in vendor specific login commands was not being read properly and as a result some login related error messages were not being displayed correctly.
    QA: Yes - we need automated tests to make sure that errors.properties and vendors.properties in BlazeDS/LCDS are loaded properly.
    Doc: No
    Modified Paths:
    blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/common/src/java/flex/messaging/util/PropertyStringResource Loader.java
    blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/opt/src/jrun/flex/messaging/security/JRunLoginCommand.java
    blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/opt/src/tomcat/flex/messaging/security/TomcatLoginCommand. java

    I have a lot of grief with this version of Windows Media Player.
    It is very buggy and frustrating to use.
    I have my Music library on a QNAP NAS, which is as reliable as they come.
    System notifications make it not save changes.  It also does not do a good job of interpreting albums and artists from folders.  Changes to track names are not saved, nor are tracks moved to other albums, renamed albums, changes to genre, artist
    or date.  It separates and merges albums/tracks without sense or reason.  Some changes I've made up to 4 times, then closed WMP and re-started my machine to check if it has/hasn't saved the changes.  Often it has not.
    This is the first time I've used WMP in this capacity, and I do not recommend it.
    New service pack please.

Maybe you are looking for