Valuation strategy for Split Valuation.

Dear SAP Experts,
We have split valuation for some of the raw materials.
Whaile running Std Cost estimate system gives following errors even if we have maintained the price under valuation type.
CK465: No price could be determined
CK240: Cost component split costed with value of zero
CK168: Cost estimate for material is Incorrect.
In Valuation varriant we have strategy 7 & 4 (ie price control as per material master & as per planned price). We dont want maintain any planned price.
I would like to know is there any Standard Valuation strategy exist in the valuation variant.
Best Regards
Nikhil

If you have maintained price at valuation type level then to consider them you will have to activate mixed costing for costing type and valuation variant you are using in configuration. You will also need to create a qty structure type for this. Once this is done, you will have to maintain procurement alternatives ( T code CK91N - process category BBV) and maintain mixing ratio (CK94). This will ensure correct costing.
Assign points, if useful.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar

Similar Messages

Vendor Consignment for Split Valuated Materials

Dear All,
We have a scenario where in our material is split valuated,we have 2 valuation type import and Domestic, both the valuation type is being supplied by a single distributor, the price of the import valuation type is different from the price of domestic valuation type.
We are trying to configure consiginment process for split valuted material.While maintianing consignment info record, we are not able to maintian separate info record for import and domestic valuation type (since material /vendor/plant/purchase organization are same).Hence while doing goods issue using 201 K, the system is taking the price from the info record.Is there any solution available, to post the goods issue for import valuation type at a different price and domestic valuation type at different price.
Thanks,
Vairavan.

How system will pick the info record price for movement type 201 K ?
As of my knowledge, system will create accounting entry as per the material price (MM03 - Accounting 1 view for the valuation type)
It may create problem for 411 K movement type, but not for movement type 201 K.
If you need to pick different price as per valuation type, then you can do this via condition table.
Have a look into the discussion Info record Price on the basis of Valuation type

Configuration steps for split valuation

Dear Gurus,
I have completed following steps in MM configuration.
A.Defining Enterprise structure
A1. Defining controlling areas
A1. Defining Plants
A3. Defining Storage Locations for Plants
A4. Defining Purchase Organization
A5. Assigning Purchase Organization to Plants
A6. Assigning Plants to company code
A7. Assigning purchasing organisation s to company code
A8. Assigning purchasing organisation s to plant
A9. Creating Purchase Groups
Now I am facing problem in Split evaluation.I am not able to create create valuation class & valuation type.
What is the role of split valuation ?
What are the configuration steps for split valuation?
Can anybody guide me on this/
Thanks & regards,
NB

Hi NB
A fruit company is importing apple from America & Europe. The price of apple imported from America is Rs.10 per Kg. The apple imported from Europe is Rs.15 per Kg. How do they maintain material master for Apple with two prices..?
A chemical factory produces methanol. The cost of methanol produced internally is Rs.20 per liter. But due to high production they purchases methanol from outside at Rs.30 per liter. How do they maintain material master for methanol with two prices..?
Petrol bunks have different varieties of petrol. Hi speed petrol costs Rs.52 and ordinary petrol costs Rs. 47. How do they maintain material master for petrol with two prices..?
If your answer is to maintain two material codes i.e. one for apple-America & one for apple-Europe then you are wrong. If your answer is Split Valuation, then you are right.!
Steps:
We have to activate split valuation if you want to use split valuation. But by default split valuation is Active.To activate the split valuation:
tcode OMW0.
To differentiate between material stocks, you must define valuation category and valuation type.
The valuation category specifies which criterion should be used as the basis for differentiating between the various partial stocks.
The valuation type specifies an individual characteristic of a partial stock.
Go to tcode OMWC, create global types, then global category. assign global types to global categ. and then attach them to valuation area(plant).
regards
Yogesh

Inforecord for Split valuated materials

Hi all,
How can i maintain different prices for split valuated materials
For Eg. I have a material split valuated based on its Quality vendor supplies two diff quality materials with different prices
how to maintain the prices in inforecords or any alternative to maintain both the prices.
With regards,
Krishna

hi..
Split valuation is for Valuation Purpose only...
SAP does not support....Procuring same material with Diff. Split Valuation Type from Single Vendor is not allowed by SAP standard..
You cannot Maintain Purchase Info for Material which is having 2 Split Valuation type......with One Vendor......
Because For One vendor and One material combination, you can maintain One split valuation type only....
Hope it works..
Thanks..

Prerequisites for split valuation?

Dear Gurus,
what are the Prerequisites for split valuation?
thanks in advance..

Hi mate,
In split valuation you can valuate the material in MAP. The main accounting view should always be in MAP. The price control of the valuation types can be either of standard price or MAP.
In split valuation the number of accounting 1 views will be Number of valuation types +1.
Edited by: sriramkadiyam on Feb 3, 2010 6:22 AM

Different price for split valuation

hai
for split valuation material shal we define different pricing?
for ex :
materail - Pen
we split the category is "colour "
the valuation type is red , blue ,black (with different prices)
red - 12 Rs
blue -15 Rs
black -10 Rs
i know that we can maintain in material master record .
But we need while doing THE P.O for red colour pen the price must be Automatically taken from the system as 12 Rs,
and same as blue colour pen as 15 Rs , and for black colour pen as 10 Rs.
i searched in "INFO RECORD" .we can only define the "valuation type " .we cant able to dife different pricing for split valuation material in info record
where we have to maintain the different pricing for valuation material .kindly explain.
regards
christo.

hi,
you need maintain records for your pricing condition say (pb00).For that u need to create a table in m/03 with combination of material valuation type , price.and then assign the table in accesses sequence of the pb00. then maintain records in mek1 with key combination of the above created table.it will help u.

Only price control "V" is possible for split valuation'

Hi
For semi finished items price control has been assigned as 'V'.when i am trying to change the same to S' I got the error message is"Only price control "V" is possible for split valuation''.Even i checked and corrected the MRP views in Material master.
Can any one help me to sort out this issue
Regards,
P.Selvakumar

Hi,
I guess that you are getting the error message M3 185 ('Only price control "V" is
possible for split valuation').   This message is correct.
ONLY materials with Moving Average Price can use the split valuation
function.
The reason is the following one:
If there are 2 valuation types, named X and Y.
There is an equality:
Material pricetotal quantity = Price Xquantity X + Price Y*quantity Y
In order to balance,
When X and Y is 'V', the header material should use 'V'.
When X is 'V', Y is 'S', the header material should use 'V'.
When X and Y is 'S', the header material should use 'V'.
So only price control V is possible for split valuation.
In accordance with the text of the message M3185, split valuation
requires the price code 'V' (moving average price) for the header
record.
Please, refer to the SAP Library (http://help.sap.com) documentation
under the menu path (for your current release level, 470):
MM - Material Price Change (MM-IV-MP)
-> Split Valuation
   -> Creating Material Subject to Split Valuation
"Creating Material Subject to Split Valuation:
1. First create a valuation header record for this material. This is
   where the individual stocks of a material are managed cumulatively.
To do this, fill in the Valuation category field on the accounting
   screen when you create the material master record and leave the
   Valuation type field blank. In the Price control field, enter V
   (moving average price), since a moving average price is constructed
   in the valuation header record from the values and quantities of the
   individual stocks. When you save, the system creates the valuation
   header record.
2. Then create the material for a valuation type.
   To do this, call up the material in creation mode again. Due to the
   fact that a valuation header record exists, the system requires you
   to enter a valuation type for the valuation category.
3. Repeat step two for every valuation type planned."
In order for the system to take into account the different values of
the substocks, the material at the header level must necessarily have
a 'moving average price' (V) control.
Regards,
MLM

Physical inventory document creation for split valuated material

Hi
We are doing stock count in our company. We are using split valuation for some of the materials. When I tried to create a PID for split valuated material which are not in stock, system issued a standard error message. What I understood from that error message, we can create a PID for split valuated materials which are in stock. Is it so? If so, then how can we count split valuated material?
Let me know if you need any info.
Thanks in advance..
Jeny...

Please refer to SAP note 30254 and it should help.
Symptom
If you create a physical inventory document for a material in a storage
location without existing storage location segment, error message M7006
is displayed: 'Material & (material number) & (plant) & (storage
location) does not exist'. Thus, a storage location segment is not
created automatically for this material.
The same also applies to the batch segment. The batch segment is also
not created automatically but, if a batch is specified for a material
when creating a physical inventory document, that is not yet created for
this material, error message M7042 is generated: 'Batch & & & & does not
exist'.
The same applies to the special stock segments which are also not
created automatically. Different error messages are generated here
depending on the special stock (see also Note 64448).
Additional key words
MI01, MI09, MI10, M7076, M7183, M7184, M7185, MARD, MCHA, MCHB, MSKA,
MKOL, MSKU, MSPR, MSLB
Cause and prerequisites
If no storage location segment or batch segment or special stock segment
exists to a material, this then means that a goods movement did never
occur before in the system to this material (batch) to this storage
location (special stock), that is that the material (batch) never had a
stock to this storage location (special stock) in the system before and
that it was never posted before on this segment. It is therefore not
possible to carry out a physical inventory for such a material (batch).
It is different, if a goods movement has already occurred to a material
(batch) to this segment and if only the present stock is zero. A
physical inventory is then necessary and also feasible for this material
(batch) since the different segments are not deleted automatically in
the moment in which the stock becomes zero.
Solution
For a material for that no storage location segment, batch segment or
special stock segment exists, it is not necessary, to carry out a
physical inventory on this storage location or for this batch or this
special stock. If, however, a quantity is physically found to such a
material, the corresponding segment must be created before the physical
inventory.
There are 3 options to create storage location data:
       - maintain the 'Storage' view in the material master for the
          material and storage location or
                                                                  Page 2
       - use the 'Enter storage locations' function in the material
          master or
       - post the first goods receipt (providing, the automatic
          creation of storage location data is permitted in the plant
          and for the movement type).
There are 2 options to create batch data}:
       - create the batches in the material master manually via
          function 'Create batch'.
       - post the first goods receipt for the batches to the respective
          material.
You can only post the various special stock segments via posting a goods
receipt. An exception is special stock 'K' (vendor consignment). You
must define a consignment price in the material master for this special
stock using the 'Create vendor consignment' function before a goods
receipt can be posted for this special stock.

Go Live Strategy for CO/MM

Hi,
Please suggest the Go Live strategy for CO / MM especially from Product costing point of view.
I have an issue, whether material prices of FG and SFG should be uploaded along with the quantity?
1.Whether, these prices are to be maintained in material master before executing the standard cost estimate?
2.What would happen if std prices are maintained (based on legacy stock valuation) and thereafter std cost is run. Whether the differential would be recorded as material revaluation?
3.Suppose Go live is on 1st.. the stock valuation of 31st would be available only on 3rd.. then in such cases, I would have to execute the std cost.. to ensure production/despatches are not stopped on 1st and 2nd. In such case how would the FG/SFG value as per initial upload match with Material master.
Please suggest the implications as well as the best practice.
Regards

Hi Swapnik,
Your understanding is correct. Pls go through the following...
But, there are two strategies for this...
1. Which I explained previously...in this case, you need to explaine the Core Team to estimate the expected PDiff in SAP and make suitable JV and neutralise the balances at the time of upload itself. See, literally when you released the Cost Estimate for the Products and Inventory Qty balances are available in Excel (or legacy) you would definitely come to know what is going to be the difference between legacy Inventory Value and SAP Inventory Value. Even the Business will have an option to reconsider their Quantity Structure and other things.
This would be suggestible to Core Team when they have very systematic data and approach available with them about the Standard Costs of the Products.
2. The second one is your strategy...
Upload the Inventory with Values, then run the Std Cost Estimate. In this method, you should be sure of how much PDiff is going to hit your P&L. You can even change the sequence of steps you mentioned as follows...
1. You upload Material (inputs) Qty and value
2. Stock of FG and SFG with value is uploaded - This would tally with GL balance upload
3. Std cost of SFG and FG would be run and released. Difference is posted in material revaluation account.
The decision whether you have to follow method 1 or 2, you are the best person to choose depending on your client. It is an open secret that there would be lot of manipulations to be done in data by them so that they would not face any problem they get into SAP. Method 1 will be more suitable for such instances....
Hope you got it...revert back for futher explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri
Edited by: Srikanth Munnaluri on Apr 18, 2009 12:16 AM

Release strategy for PO and Contract

Hi,
I maintain characteritic for PO
Plant
Doc Type
Net Order Value
Purchasing Group
I maintain characteristic for contract
Company code
Target Value
Doc Type
Purchasing group
My class consist of
Plant
Doc Type
Net Order Value
Purchasing Group
Company code
Target value
Q1: Do i need to maintain ALL characteristic value when i define my release strategy for PO or Contract as some characteristic only apply to PO only or contract only?
Q2: What option do i have if i need to maintain all characteristic value ? leave it blank ? empty
Currently my PO release is working fine but when i try to maintain the contract release inside the class . my PO release is not triggering . I maintained diffrent release group for both PO and Contract .
Thank for your advice

First of all
For purchasing like PO,pr,contract you can able to get in ekko table.No need to maintain separate release unless if it your business requirement.Take Document type as one of the characteristics it will distinguish whether it is PO or contract.
You have to maintain all the characteristic value then only it will trigered release.
Check the release indicator as well.
Hope it will help.

Release strategy for quantity contract

Hi Gurus,
In quantity contract .. target value will not filled by the value(in header details) as it is quantityt contract.
We may have different line items with different cost..
my doubt is how the release strategy will be triggered for the quanityt contract and how the system will consider the whole value of the contract..
please explain/clarify
regards
subbu

Hi,
The release strategy for the contract will work in the exact mechanism as for the PO i.e. it will be determined based upon the total net value of the entire purchasing document.
Cheers,
HT

Release Strategy for SA/Contract/PO

Hi friends,
Should we have different release groups and release codes in contracting/ SA/ PO.
Because...
I have maintained 4 characteristics in release strategy for PO _[ Comp Co, plant, porg, total net order value].
But i want to maintan only 2 characteristics in release strategy for contract [plant, total net order value]
because the same is reflecting in contract config also.
Is it possible..please help me frnds.
Prabhu

Hi Prabhu,
Unfortunately you need to maintain characteristics of all possible values for company code and plant for contractsu2019 to subject the release.
Wish that SAP would be more flexible with release of PO, Contract and RFQ but it does not.
Regards

Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
Satish

S0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you

Data conversion strategy for new SOB

Dear Viewers
on 11.5.10
We are creating a new SOB with a change in currency from Feb-11 as this is the requirement
For the same, we need to do data conversion.
I have a confusion for Purchase Orders and Sales Orders
Purchase Orders:
Open purchase orders will be converted, means the unfulfilled PO`s i.e the ones not received and are fully open.
The PO`s which have been recieved but not delivered, Requested the users to clear the intransit receipts.
The PO's which are partially received, what to be done for them?
If a PO is fully received and Delivered will not me converted to the new SOB as its not an open PO
but If invoice comes after Feb-11, than how the matching will be done?
What if a return has to be made moving forward in FEB-11 under new SOB
Sales Orders:
Open sales orders will be converted, that is the ones that have been entered and not yet booked.
Users have been requested to clear off the Sales order lines which are already pick confirmed but not yet shipped, hence they will be shipped and interfaced to AR
For the Sales orders that have been booked, those lines that are not yet processed further will also be converted.
Now what if a receipt comes after feb 11, how to handle this as the sales order wiould not have been converted?
Please give your advise on the data migration strategy for PO`s and SO's.
Please do add any point that may have been missed by me
Appreciate your help
Thanks
Emm

Hi David,
for master data conversion you can use LSMW and the RE-FX BAPIs. (please refer to SAP note [782947|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/782947] ).
Regards, Franz

Release strategy for Schedule lines in SD

Hello All
Can we create a release strategy for Schedule Lines in Scheduling Agreement? If Yes How?
I have already maintained a release strategy for Item Level... which I want to put it for Schedule line as well....
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
I think you are in the wrong forum. Please choose the right forum category and post it there.
Matthias

Valuation strategy for Split Valuation.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for