Variant price not defaulting to contract

Hi
i have set up a new contract type, created a new material which is configurable, created characteristics, class and table, however, when i use the material in the contract - although i can pick the relevant variants no price comes through.... i have looked at the analysis on the conditions tab and get
Condition type     Message     Description
EK01     001     Manual condition
PR00     013     Manual condition / Condition record is missing
PB00     001     Manual condition
ZZ00     102     Access not made (initialized field)
condition ZZ00 has been created for the material and all variants
i know i must be missing something simple but not sure what -  maybe issue on material, customer master, contract type?
any ideas would be greatly appreciated
Karen

Hi,
Check that requirements have been met to access this condition record and also ensure that condition records have been maintained for this condition type.
You can create new variant condition by using the T.Code "VK30".Call these variants in Dependencies/variant tables to determine the price.
Regards,
Krishna.

Similar Messages

  • Price not copying from contract to maintenance order in IW31

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing issue in one of the client where Price is not copying from contract to maintenance order in IW31. But while doing the same in another client it is working fine.
    I did not find the settings for this change. Can any one please help me for which settings price is not copying to IW31 transaction?
    Thanks in advance!
    Best regards,
    Karun Kumar

    hi
    i think if you have assinged the contract the servies will not copied ,for this in the external tab select the serice selectionbutton ,here specify the agreement from their select the serives you required
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Variant  price not display

    Hi,
      Gays,
    I have a problem in variants, i maintain variant price records (VA),but  it did not display in order and PGI also not working.pls give some information to me.
    Regards.
    rao.

    Go to t-code CU50, In the characteristics assignment for the characteristics, select the desired characteristics value and click on the button, 'assign variant condition'. Enter a value here say 'example'.
    Next go to the t-code VK30, create the key here as 'example'.
    Next go to the VK11 and for your material use this key as the variant.
    This would resolve your problem.
    Regards,
    Gauravjit.
    reward points if the solution is helpful for you.
    Reward points if the set-up helps.

  • Price not adopted from Contract using Source list

    Hi all!
    I have read a few threads related to Source lists and why assignment does not pick up the price from the contract if the contract is the only source, but do still not understand this.
    I have a sourcelist with a fix source of supply (Vendor, Contract). During automatic assignment, this contract is picked up correctly, but the price from the material master is retained. Why does the system not adopt the price from the contract?
    Appriciate if someone could explain the logic behind this system behaviour.
    brgs Ziggy

    Hi
    Check whether any parameter id (EFB or EVO) is assigned to your id in SU01. If the price is copied from PO, then you will have a parameter id EFB in your user in SU01 which is defined in OMET. EVO is buyer's default. Standard SAP is it defaults from last PO. You define buyer default in customization and stop copying last PO price in your new PO.
    Regards
    Antony

  • Desired vendor in PR not defaulting in contract

    Hi,
    I am giving desired vendor in PR. On referring this PR, desired vendor is defaulting in PO but not in contract. Is there any settings that I've to do to appear it in contract ?
    Regards,
    Sat

    Hi,
    Do refer the below OSS Note.. which explains the detail solution for your query.
    864822 - ME31K: Contract ref to PR, does not come as source of supply

  • WHY Price is not defaulted from inforecord in a P.O with material group.

    When i tried to create P O for a material group & i mentioned material text, Price was not defaulted in PO from inforecord unless i mention inforecord number even if  i mentioned vendor & valid inforecord is exist for the same material group & vendor.

    Hi,
    Data will be adopted only from PR,RFQ & contract.Eventhough if u maintained inforecord, data will not flown from info record it is only the price picked from inforecord.
    thanks
    suresh

  • Why is information defaulting from Contract and not from PIR in the PO?

    Hi Gurus,
    As far as I knew, the information in the PIR (Purchase Info Record) should get importance, while getting defaulted into the PO. The planned delivery time in PIR is different than that in the material master and the price in the contract is also different from that in PIR. Now, when I am creating a Standard PO (doc type NB), and putting the contract and line item in the outline agreement column, and hitting enter, the price is pulled up from contract. Although, I can see the info record in the correct column, but price is not defaulting from there. Again, the delivery time is calculated based on the planned delivery days in the material master (GR processing time = zero) and NOT from the Planned delivery time value in the Info record.
    I think, I am doing something wrong or there is something wrong in my understanding. Please help.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    If there's 2 source in the PO (Contract and Info record), the system will take the source from Contract, as its SAP standard design that contract has a higher priority then PIR. To make sure it, check to your Contract document as well , if the info update is updating the condition or not.
    You can perform a simple test also, create a PO with only PIR and a PO with Contract and PIR, you will see the difference.

  • Variant price is not picking?

    Hi All,
    iam working on variant configuration where iam facing a unique problem.
    if there are 2 charactaristics(charactaristics with variant and price) it is picking price for variant.
    If there are more than two charectaristics other than price variant either its picking one charataristics variant price or it is not picking variant price at all.
    What might have been wrong with me?
    Regards,
    Reddyy

    Hi,
    U r maintaing Price for Value of the Charecterstics....okay any number of values of Diff charecters you can maintain the Price...
    but be sure that ...THe price charecter should assign the Table and Filed....
    Let me know wr exactly r u facing problem.
    Regards
    raj

  • Variant price for one feature is missing -error in sales order

    Hello Experts,
    I am working on a SAP implementation project for a premier automobile company...
    I have stuck on one point here in this project SAP is a back end system. So sales order will generated based on the interface feed from a legacy system.
    We have Identified to have two different variant classes in SAP sales order. one will contained all vehicle specification, this will be used by PP for MRP and other variant class will have only optional features and all these features should have variant price in VA00 (maintained as pricing record) in pricing. if any of the feature don't have price then this sales sales order should through an error massage (we will customized this error message as per clients requirement)
    Can any one suggest the relevant sales order user exit or any other method to do this check?
    Thank & Regards,
    Sulabh

    Hi Sulabh,
    In standard procedure any component value of VA00 not picked by the sale order system doe's not show any kind of message.
    Use exit MV45AFZZ - USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMK.take the help of ABAPer he will write the logic where the VA00
    value missing in sale order system should through the error or warning and message which will illustrate the problem,according
    to that user will check and maintain the price.
    Ram

  • IMR7 : Creation of a new Screen Variant does not save Layout

    Hello,
    In IMR7, if I create a new screen Variant with a modified the default Layout field, the next time I log-in to SAP, system does not recognize my Layout selection.
    Do you have a suggestion?
    Thanks
    François

    Hello,
    Thanks for your support but it did not resolved my problem.
    When I save Layout I  have three fields:
    -Layout name
    -User-specific checkbox
    -Description
    Even though User-specific is not checked, next time I relog to SAP and choose my Variant, the layout I have chosen in this variant is not keeped in memory. A layout named 4_SAP_IM is always displayed.
    Do you have the same behavior?
    Thanks
    François

  • Net weight of the material is not copying from contract to sales order

    net weight of the material is not copying from contract to sales order?
    plz help me

    Hi,
    If the *CONDITION VALUES* are *manually* entered then the values will not be copied from the *SOURCE TO TARGET* document
    Please check in the  Contract whether the vales derived from Condition records are entered manually.
    If you want the prices to be copied automatically then they have to maintained through CONDITION RECORDS in *VK11*.
    Please maintain the CONDITION RECORDS and check whether they have copied or not
    Please also cehck the COPY CONTROLS from CONTRACT to SALES ORDER in VTAA transaction -- at item--->pricing type. and set it a s  D
    Please check the above settings and let forum know the feedback.
    regards,
    santosh

  • When creating a return by copying an order tax and charges are not defaulting?

    Hi,
    I have created a Return by copying sales order. But tax and charges are not defaulted from original sales order. Please note unit selling price is 0 for this item. I am using 11.5.10.2 version.
    Sales Order: 143674
    Item: UT1
    Quantity: 2
    unit selling price: $0
    Tax: $0
    Charges: $0
    Calculated price flag: Freeze Price
    But Return created as follows by using copy.
    Return Order: 6678
    Item: UT1
    Quantity: -2
    unit selling price: $0
    Tax: -$5
    Charges: -$20
    Calculated price flag: Partial Price
    Your help will be highly appreciated.

    Hi
    At sales order form, you select Action > Copy
    Change the order type to your "Return transaction type"
    Go to Line Tab
    Change the line type to Return type, enter return reason.
    Save
    This creates new RMA order.....this way this should copy the original tax amount.
    For the Charges part, check in the modifier definition whether "Include on Returns" is checked in the Discount/Charges TAB.
    Thanks
    -Arif.

  • Layout is not defaulted in ESS My Expenses

    Hi,
    I have gone to transaction POWL_QUERY to maintain the layout variant
    for FITV_POWL_TRIPS_EXP. After I saved the variant to be the default
    variant for all, I logged into ESS and try to access the query.
    However, the newly created variant layout is not defaulted.
    I have also executed POWL_D01 to refresh the cache.
    Anyone encountered this issue before or tried changing the default variant?
    Thanks.

    Hello folks,
    I hope you don't mind me jumping in to rant a bit, since this thread concerns two of my favourit pet hates, the Admin Personalization Layer and POWL
    I am not suprised it doesnt work and not sure any OSS note will solve the problem... I think it is because POWLs for FI-TV are "strangely" developed
    This, exactly.
    1/ Launch your fitv_powl_trips web dynpro application from se80
    2/ Add &sap-config-mode=X at the end of the URL path and type enter.
    3/ Use option buton to create your ivew as you did it in the layout (store it in a customizing TR).
    4/ Launch POWL_D01 and it should be working now.
    @ Matthieu: I object. IMO the approach Yvonne described in her opening post is the cleaner one. Doesn't matter much though, since the technical outcome of Yvonne's approach and yours is identical, only the 'functional point of entry' differs. However, implicit WDA Personalization that is supposed to be valid system wide and for all users should never never never be issued via the Admin Personalization Layer, i.e. &sap-config-mode=X, because:
    the Layer is overall superfluous and unstable
    it is a User Specific customiziation, even if the user scope is "A"
    Transporting Admin Personalization is a mess and scarcely works stable
    @ Yvonne: What you should do now to clean things up is:
    1. Delete your Admin Personalizations you've created via WDA WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_USER and Transport this Deletion (and hope the Transport works, otherwise delete the Personalizations on each subsequent system manually)
    2. Repeat what you wrote you did in your opening post, i.e. TA POWL_QUERY, Button Layout-Variant, but then before doing anything, in the URL change the parameter from "&sap-config-mode=X" to "&sap-config-mode=config". You'll notice that orange-like banner above the application changing from "Customizing-Mode" to "Configuration-Mode". Now repeat doing your adjustments, save them, make a Transport, enter the Layout IDs in the query (Note: enter them via the F4-help, not manually) and finally run POWL_D01.
    The outcome is an in-built component configuration that can be transported cleanly, isn't unstable and even works pretty well with the horrible POWL-technology. To verify that you've created configurations of the correct type, check WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_COMP, your configurations should be here. Subsequently check that the entries are NOT in WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_USER, if they are, things went wrong again.
    Hope that helps
    Cheers, Lukas

  • ERS indicator of PO item is not checked for Contract assigned SRM POs.

    Hi Team
    We have SRM PO which is assigned to contract as source of supply and vendor for the contract document is assigned with ERS functionality (Aut. setlement in vendor master) for Invoice settlement.
    Issue faced: When the contract is selected as sources of supply for Shopping cart and ordered as release order in MM (classic deployment) MM PO line ERS flag is not defaulted. Scenario works for normal procurement with vendor assigned Purchase orders.
    Did any one faced similar issue in their landscape.
    Regards
    Prashanth K Saralaya

    I think this  is one of the vendor data synchronisation issue like OA vendor .
    Vendor master team might change some data but in contract it will not be synched automaticaly. we may require action on CONTRACT equivalent to vendor master maintenance.
    if the contract has ERS .It might be available in PO too when you refer contract.
    debate come here like who takes precedence vendor master or contract ?
    However customer may expect this ERS falg has to set in the contract as well as it may replicate the same in po as well.
    for testing manually EDIT via ECC contract and flag ERS.
    muthu

  • InfoView not defaulting print settings from Crystal Reports XI

    I have a form/report created from Crystal Reports XI published to InfoView that has the print settings set for the manual tray when printed. When running the report in InfoView, it does not default to the manual tray when printing. I am publishing directly from Crystal Reports. I have the Process/Print Setup 'Set layout to: Report file default' and the Schedule/Format 'Use options saved with report' checkbox checked. I am not finding any other settings to tell InfoView to use the report page layout/printer settings. Anyone know of any other options I should check? Thanks!
    Edited by: Kelley Freelove on Oct 22, 2009 3:09 PM

    That would be the correct forum as this one is for SDK issues only.
    If you are not getting helped on the other BO forum you may want to consider creating a case if you have a valid support contract.
    Jason

Maybe you are looking for