VAT Issue with prepayment orders for China !!

Hi All,
The issue is specific with China country !
Today when we are create a Prepayment Order the VAT is triggered upon the Prepayment invoice. According to the auditors this is not the correct treatment of VAT. Tax should be triggered at the time of Revenue Recognition instead, which means at the time when the billing document is generated. But billing document is created with u201CZEROu201D value hence we canu2019t determine any tax there.
Would like to know if there is any way to solve this within the standard functionalities !
BR
Surendra

Hi Vishwa,
Thanks for your inputs. The view V_T496F is the same as seen in t-code OPK8 & in that i find fields only for Sapscript & PDF forms.
In the other link which i have pasted, Mr. Michael clearly specifies, that i cannot associate smart forms in OPK8. He suggests the use of NACE, but i am not quite sure how to go about it, so if you can provide me some inputs on how to proceed, it would be helpful.
Regards,
Vivek

Similar Messages

Issue with online order for the special offer "photography" (ie lighroom + photoshop) at 9.99 eur/mth.

I registered yesterday online for the special offer "photography" (ie lighroom + photoshop) at 9.99 eur/mth. And I received an email today saying that my order #AD005339091BE had been cancelled and that if I want to make a new order, I have to call a number 0805 770077.... but it's onyl open from 5 am to 5pm!
And I don't want to loose time again doing an online order if the system does not work....
I want to make sure that If I place the order after the end of the trial period, the amount won't be higher than the actual offer (9.99).
What's the issue & solution?
Txs
Chris.

i don't know how long that offer will last but it's been available for months.
in any case, you can use most (including lr and ps) for 30 days free. so you don't need to waste time waiting for 5am in your locale.

Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

We have an issue with sale order stock.
Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
We need to get rid of this quant.
I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
Thanks

Hi,
You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
(...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

Issues with Purchase order change documents

Hi Gurus,
I have some peculiar issues with Purchase order. The PO line item has deletion indicator set but I can't find who set the deletion indicator. The PO change documents doesn't show anything related to deletion indicator.
Please help to fix the Issue.
Regards,
Senthil

Hi
Check it in Tcode SE16
Table Name CDHDR and CDPOS
Regards,
Raman

I have an issue with disappearing option for 1920x1080 in Preferences / Displays.

Recently updated to 10.9 - have all updates installed - Mid 2010 iMac 21.5.
I have an issue with disappearing option for 1920x1080 in Preferences / Displays. - After overnight shutdown, my iMac woke up and the screen resolution of my 2nd was set at 800 x 600 - the display a Samsung S22B150 was previously working properly at 1920 x 1080. This option is no longer available in the system preferences - highest resolution available 1600 x 1200.
I use my mMac for Photography and use the second monitor for the interface, leaving the iMac screen as a full work area for the photos.
I have tried:
Power down Monitor & restart
Shutdown & restart
Shutdown & restart in Safe Boot Mode (options same in Prefs)
Power down Monitor & restart in Safe Boot Mode
Ran Disc Utility - Repaired Permissions, verified both HDD & Mac OSX
Udated Pram
I am now at a loss, I guess I could try a recovery, and download/install Mavericks again, but do not wish to do this if I can help it.
I have searched the net to see if there are any Terminal commands to enable the resolution, but can find nothing.
Anyone out there have any ideas, please.

Back up all data. Quit System Preferences if it's running.
Triple-click anywhere in the line below on this page to select it, then copy the text to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C:
~/Library/Preferences/ByHost
In the Finder, select
Go ▹ Go to Folder...
from the menu bar. Paste into the box that opens (command-V), then press return. A folder should open. If it does, look for a file with a long name that begins "com.apple.preference.displays2". There may be several such files. Move them to the Trash.
Test.

Issue with Visibility Settings for Backgrounds and Layers

I am using Acrobat Pro XI 11.0.10 (Windows) and having an issue with visibility settings for layers and backgrounds. I am attempting to get backgrounds to appear while viewing in Adobe Reader and Acrobat Pro but not be printed and so far have had no success.
When using a background the Appearance Options dialogue has "Show when printing" unchecked, but "Show when displaying on screen" is checked. This results in the background not showing on the screen, and the background will only appear once the box for "Show when printing" is checked. It looks like the option for printing is dictating whether or not the background is able to appear.
Using layers has not worked either. The background layer is set to "Never Prints", but will still show up when printed.
I was wondering if anyone else has run into this and has a solution, or has any recommendations.
Thanks in advance.

Hi setrev2012,
How are you adding the backgroud?
The only way I can think to accomplish this is via a watermark.
The basics...
Open PDF in Acrobat. Choose Pages > Watermark > Add Watermark.
Select a jpg or PDF of your background and adjust scaling options as desired.
Then click the Appearance Options.. and uncheck the Show When Printing option.
In this image the PDF is a blank page with the word "Test" on it. The watermark is the stamp and impression (a stock photo jpg).
If you want a solid color background, just create a flat image of the background color for use as the watermark.
If you have already followed the steps and still facing the issue then please share the file with me at [email protected] so that i can have a look.
Regards,
Rave

Hello every one, am having issue with my itunes, for some reason or another my icon in the itunes doesnt change, its stuck on Songs, and will not let me get playlist or anything else. can any one tell me if that can be fixed

hello every one, am having issue with my itunes, for some reason or another my icon in the itunes doesnt change, its stuck on Songs, and will not let me get playlist or anything else. can any one tell me if that can be fixed

http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3694#error-1
Error 1 or -1
This may indicate a hardware issue with your device. Follow Troubleshooting security software issues, and restore your device on a different known-good computer. If the errors persist on another computer, the device may need service.

Issues with Creative Cloud for teams deployment workflow

The Adobe Creative Cloud for teams IT Deployment Guide lists out steps for IT admins to deploy the CS6 applications and then have their end-users license the trial software with their Adobe IDs once they have been invited to the team. There are two major issues with this document.
First, the media that is on the FTP is not for North American English. We are working to get that posted on the FTP site ASAP. In the meantime, you can find the CS6 MC media from: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/
[Note: Getting media from that page requires the use of the Adobe Download Assistant which is very consumer focused. Sorry about that.]
Second, in order to have the ability to login properly with a Creative Cloud for Teams account the system needs to have the latest copy of Adobe Application Manager installed. If you do not do this step the end user will be prompted for a serial number.
Unfortunately the Adobe Application Manager can’t be packaged with AAMEE nor is it a native installer. I know, I know! Here are the links to the Adobe Application Manager installers:
Windows: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4773
Mac: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4774
It can be installed from command line by:
Win: <Path to Setup.exe>Set-up.exe –mode=silent –action=install
Mac: <path to ASU> /ASU/Install.app/Contents/MacOS/Install –mode=silent –action=install
Jody Rodgers | Sr. Product Manager | Creative Cloud for Enterprise | Adobe Systems

Hi Boncker,
I see that you have an active Subscription under your account . Please launch any of the installed product and when you get the trial prompt , please click on License this software and then Enter the Adobe Id & Password for the account that you have accepted the invite .
Please do let us know if that worked for you or not .
Cheers,
Kartikay Sharma

Issue with RTL order in hyperlinks on Pages 5.2

Hello,
I am having an issue with the Arabic order when trying to add a hyperlink to a text in Pages 5.2. When I type the sentence without the hyperlink the order is perfect, however when I add the the URL link to the selected text the sentence order becomes corrupted.
Could you please let me know if there is some feature that I am missing to apply or is just that the RTL support on Pages 5.2 is not very good?
Do you have a workaround to this problem?
So far the only way to solve it that I found it was to create a transparent text box with the link over the sentence. However I would like to found a better solution to this.
Screenshots for reference:
Correct order without link.
Incorrect order with link
Thanks in advance for your time and help.
Leo

negative101 wrote:
Unfortunately I need to work on Pages 5.2 due to client requeriments. And also like you mention playing with the Text Direction is does not work since it change the whole paragraph direction and not just a specific selection.
You client insists on .pages format?
See this for other potential options regarding text direction:
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14203

Issues with trade in for promotion of iPhone 6

I have had nothing but issues while trying to purchase the iPhone 6. I have been a Verizon customer for over 4 years. First is was my data plan had to change, I’m like ok… but the info. i was given by 3 different people was incorrect. I was downgraded from an unlimited dat plan to a 2GB for the same price. I was told by since I was downgrading from unlimited I would be able to purchase a 2GB plan but receive 6GB …. well that was “mis-informed” as I was told when I put in my pre-order for my iPhone 6 and then had to wait 2 hours to speak with someone about the data plan because my online order would not go through until the dat plan was fixed.
I pre-order my phone and fallout the trade in form for my iPhone 4 (which was still working). My trade in was canceled after i received the new iPhone! Apparently the system couldn’t catch up fast enough and then when you call the Trade in # you can not get through. I fill out a 2nd application and this was sticks. I mail the iPhone 4 in…. and 3 weeks later is it received and processed - but apparently in the shipping process the phone was damaged and now I am being “penalized”. I was supposed to receive $40 for the iPhone 4 and $160 for the new phone as a promotion.
I am being told that my screen is cracked and the phone doesn’t turn on. After calling numerous times again and finally getting through my case is being escalated to support - I reply to the support email about the situation…. the next day i get an e-giftcard for $36 - unacceptable. I write again …. now a week later still no response. I call back the trade in #. I explain everything all over again… “Sorry Ma’am we have a picture of the device and there is a small crack at the bottom corner of the screen”. So because the phone was damaged in shipping (in their packaging… a plain paper envelope no bubble wrapping, I am getting duped. I am told to call customer service for help. I call, a very nice woman answers on the phone 15 minutes she is trying to contact her supervisor, with no luck…. and she is not sure why they told me to call customer service, because it is a different dept and they can’t help anyway.
So now I sent another email in. This is ridiculous! I would have never sent in my phone for a “rebate” or order the new phone if it had not been for that promotional offer. My phone worked just fine, no cracks, no dropped calls, no Bluetooth issues, etc. like i have with this new iPhone.
This lack of customer service is unacceptable. I would have never signed up for a new 2yr contract with them if I knew all the issues I would have. 4 years of loyalty and this is how they treat their customers.

The phone was an iPhone 4, and we were informed that the Find My iPhone feature was on. However, my wife turned it off, and I double-checked this before the phone was sent in. When the feature was turned off, the instructions provided by Verizon were followed exactly, however we were informed that the feature also needed to be turned off on iCloud (even though there were no directions indicating this in any of the Verizon documentation or on the website).
At this point it isn't as much about getting the $111 as it is about letting someone know how rudely my wife was treated by Adam (he was at station 34 on Monday, February 10 - she noted this, because he refused to give out his last name). She was told several times by Adam that he does not report to anyone, that he had no supervisor, and there was no one higher up we could speak with. He was rude, condescending, and obviously blatantly lied. Additionally he intentionally kept my wife on hold for 30 minutes hoping she would give up and hang up. The reason we know that he did so intentionally, is because he also indicated that it was "actually pretty slow" in the call center. He also indicated that she had no additional recourse and should just "hang up" and "give up."
It's really just that we don't feel like we can trust the trade-in program, and won't be trading in any additional phones through that program. Thank you for responding, at least we can be sure that there is some customer service still happening at Verizon. We have just had our faith in Verizon's customer service pretty rudely shaken.

Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.

Hi Experts,
we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure 0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
{ Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock and Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero. Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
Many Thanks in advance.
Jeswanth

Hi Srini,
I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
Let me explain with an example
Material : XYZ
Plant      : A
Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
> 12th April 2009.
So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
Calendar Day     Total stock                                                                Received stock                                          Issued Stock
28.12.2005 ---> - 2640 EA
29.12.2005 --->    2000 EA                                                                       640 EA                                                        0
10.04.2009 --->      0                                                                                0                                                               2000 EA
11.04.2009 -
>    0                                                                                0                                                                0
                             (For making
                              the earlier record of initilization to 0 a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) ---> 2640 EA                                                 0                                                                0
13.04.2009
the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values... On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
This is happening only if we use both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF for loading into BW.....
If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
Thanks.
regards,
Jeswanth

SCM Issues with Sales Orders Created through CRM

Hi All,
I'm trying to ascertain any issues with ERP processing that will not update orders created through CRM, i see there was a OSS Note some time back informing that the backorder reschedule program would not update orders created in the CRM system. Is this still the case and are there any other process that we should be marking as an issue?
Thanks

Hi Sirisha,
The solution depends on the exact issue you are facing.
The CRM Sales Order is created OK, but you only see the error when you open the Sales Order?
If this is the case, then you can follow the steps below:
1. Find the Message ID and Message No for the error message
2. Use Program - CRM_MESSAGES_DELETE to delete error messages from the error producing Sales Orders.
Let me know if this is not the issue you are facing.
Regards,
Nelson

Production order overlapping with purchase orders for outside process

I set up the overlap option in a router so we can send 50 pieces (total order quantity is 200) of material ahead to an outside heat treat operation. When we try to create the purchase order for the 50 to be sent out for heat treat two problems occur.
1. The quatity in the purchase order is for the entire order of 200, not 50.
2. We get a message "Date /23/2010 period D is not valid.
We currently do not use the functionality of splits and overlaps so if anyone can help or guide me to a good resource I would appreciate it.
Regards.
Gail
Edited by: Gail Weeks on Nov 12, 2010 4:19 PM
If anyone could help with this question I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

Gail:
the next operation would be an external operation in your order ? That is, has some external Operation Control Key?
Then the PurReq for this operation is created at creation or release of the production order by the total operation quantity. Ovelapping allows you to reduce some total time in order, but I don think that can be applied for the purpose you describe. Let us know more details about your requirement.
Regards

Issue with Apps adapter for Create_Cust_Account API

Hi ,
I need to invoke this package from apps adapter in BPEL(10.1.3.5).
Create Customer: HZ_CUST_ACCOUNT_V2PUB. create_cust_account. This is a Over loaded procedure. Look for the Procedure with these Parameters.
PROCEDURE create_cust_account (
p_init_msg_list IN VARCHAR2:= FND_API.G_FALSE,
p_cust_account_rec IN CUST_ACCOUNT_REC_TYPE,
p_organization_rec IN HZ_PARTY_V2PUB.ORGANIZATION_REC_TY
PE,
p_customer_profile_rec IN HZ_CUSTOMER_PROFILE_V2PUB.CUSTOMER
PROFILEREC_TYPE,
p_create_profile_amt IN VARCHAR2:= FND_API.G_TRUE,
x_cust_account_id OUT NUMBER,
x_account_number OUT VARCHAR2,
x_party_id OUT NUMBER,
x_party_number OUT VARCHAR2,
x_profile_id OUT NUMBER,
x_return_status OUT VARCHAR2,
x_msg_count OUT NUMBER,
x_msg_data OUT VARCHAR2
But I’m getting the following error,
An error occurred while running Jpublisher.missing method
· I’ve tried with Database adapter. But in the runtime I’m not able to pass oracle apps initialization parameter in spite of using transaction and idempotent property in partnerlink.
· Then I’ve tried to invoke fnd_global.apps_initialize first then call the package from database adapter, but it fails again, apparently its not able to execute both DBadapter in same database session although they are in same BPEL transaction.
When I’m passing the initialization parameters in adapter created wrapper procedure then its working fine and customer got created.
Please let me know where I’m going wrong or issue with apps adapter.
It’s urgent …
Thanks in Advance,
Shreekanta

Thanks for the reply.
I'm able to execute the BPEL flows using DB adapter in same session and customer got created.
But I'm wondering why I cant invoke the API using Apps adapter though its standard one.
wsdl file is not getting generated as the adapter wizard not get completed.
Do u have any idea why its giving ' error occurred while running Jpublisher.missing method' error?should I conclude that apps adapter does not support overloaded procedure.

Freegoods issue with internal order CO

Dear Experts,
I am facing a Problem with free goods issue,
When I am doing sales order VA01 I am entering internal order number, once I complete the process flow it is crediting stock account (24240000) and debiting the COGS FG (50014000) account.
When I am doing sales order VA01 without internal order once I complete the process flow it is crediting Stock account (24240000) and Debiting the Free goods expenses account(60014010) (as per business process it is correct)
With internal order also it should post to free goods expenses account.
Kindly help me on this I am not able to trace.

Hi
Please check item category TANN settings.Also check in VTLA copy control there is a feild "Update Cost", tick the feild.
Please go through the links which may help you
PGI accounting
Regards
Srinath

VAT Issue with prepayment orders for China !!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for