VCR recording raw video data?????

Dear all,
First of all I would like to apologise if I am posting this topic in an entirely different section.
I am working on a video project. One of the modules I am working now is I have to record video data into a VCR. VCR will be connected to a decoder from where it will be receiving raw video data.
My project is a applet-servlet application. I dont want to use JMF, as every customer has to go thru the process of installing & other stuffs.
I totally dont have any idea on how it can be done.
If you have any idea on this regard or know any sites.. please do help me on this...
will be awaiting for yr suggestions...
Thanks in advance
Swarna

helloo ,
Please anybody have any idea on how it can be done...
Its real important..
Plzzzzzzzzzz..
Swarna

Similar Messages

  • Recording Internet Video from Mac to VCR

    Here's what I want to do ---
    There is some streaming video that I wish to be able to show to a class. I cannot download it and burn it to a DVD, so I was hoping to hook up my computer to my TV, play the video and record it to a VHS cassette.
    I have succeeded in using the TV as a monitor, with both video and sound, and I played the streaming video and hit the record button on the VCR.
    However, when I tried to play it back, I just got several minutes of a screen that was blank except for the words "Unusable Signal." Obviously it had not recorded the video.
    Does anyone know whether/how I can do what I am attempting?
    Or is there a way to connect the computer directly to the VCR and record that way?
    I realize this a backward process compared to what most people try to do with a Mac and a VCR. Please help!
    (FYI, I am using a G$ PowerBook, running OSX 10.3.9, and Samsung VCR.)
    Thanks.

    Yes, you need to hook up the Mac to the VCR directly, as if it were the TV. If you then connect the VCR output to the TV you'll be able to see what you're receiving on the VCR.
    Many VCRs have composite video connectors or S-Video connectors, to take video from handycams and the like so you should be able to do it without difficulty.

  • How do I send raw video and audio data to FMLE?

    Hi,
    I have raw video and audio data on CPU memory.
    How do I send them to FMLE?
    Is there sample code or SDK?
    Thanks for your answer.

    Hi, Burzuc.
    Raw video and audio data are from a video capture board like Blackmagic Design's DeckLink or other's.
    I want to stream them after some processing by my application.
    Regards.

  • Why does itunes say that my iphone has 9GB of video data even though I've deleted every video I've ever made

    Hello,
    When I use itunes on my macbook to view the contents of my iphone 5, the bar at the bottom of the window that shows me how much data is taken up for different categories says that I have 9 GB of video data. The thing is, I deleted all of the videos that I've ever recorded on my phone, but itunes still says I have 9.15 GB of video data! I ejected my iphone and plugged it back in multiple times to see if it was a problem with refreshing, but that didn't work. Itunes also says that I only have about 3 GB of free space left and when I go to the settings on my iphone, it says the same thing, so I know that there really are mysterious files on my iphone taking up 9 GB of space. Also, both itunes and my iphone says that I have 83 video files. I've deleted as much apps as I could, just incase there were apps that had video files included in them, but that didnt really work. I also opened the video app in utilitties on my iphone and it said that I do not have ANY videos. I don't really know what else to do.
    Is there any way to just see all of the files on my iphone? Itunes does not let me do that. It only lets me view certain files from apps like adobe reader. I need to find out what video files itunes is detecting on my iphone. Again, I've deleted all of the videos that I made on the phone by using the photos app. I never downloaded video files from safari either.
    Thanks in advance

    since moving to the mac from windows, this seems to happen less. I also found that having some videos marked as "remember playback position" resulted in a lot of updates to the ipod when i had watched them through itunes.

  • Record all the data acquired by DAQ

    Hi all,
    I have a problem when I tried to record all the data acquired by the DAQ card. My DAQ is NI 6259, and the Labview version is 2009.
    Basically, what I need do is using multiple channels to get the voltages of different point, then I subtract values of two channel (V+ and V-) to get voltage value between two points. In my vi, the sampling mode is continuous and the rate is 100 KHz, DAQmx reading is inside a while loop, and the numbers of samples per channel is set to be 100. After each loop execution I would get 100 data.  I just used the format into file to write the data into a .txt file. It seems after 1 loop only the last one data is recorded instead of 100.  Previously I averaged the 100 data inside the acquisition loop to get one data, so the writing function is OK but it really slows down the program. So I want to write all the raw data to txt file so later I can process them in Matlab.  Is there any way to achieve this? Thank you very much.
    The attached is the my vi for 2 channels voltage measurement and the current source control sub vi. I am new to Labview so the question really bothers me even after I read some similar topics in the forum.
    Regards,
    Hongxiang
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    Dual Channel Voltage Measurement.vi ‏33 KB
    Current Source 1.vi ‏49 KB

    Thank you for you reply. I tried that, it actually record more data per pulse than before, but less pulses were  recorded (there should be 8 pulses in 20 seconds time but only 2 were recorded), I think it was because the for loop inside slows down the program execution, and sometimes the error 200279 occurred.  I think it would be better to separate the reading and recording process. Someone suggests me rather than writing to the file inside the loop, accumulate the data from all of the loop iterations to generate one large array containing all of the samples then pass that to Format Into File outside the loop. Do you know how to achieve that? I tried the as below, it seems totally wrong , only two data was written. 
    (The subvi nameed 1 (see attachment) converts the 2D array to 1D ) Thanks.
    Attachments:
    2D_Data_Reader.vi ‏9 KB

  • I can't get my new iPad to record a video I see the video right above camera but it is not active yet I can't touch it to activate it.

    I can't get my new iPad to record a video I see the video right above camera but it is not active yet I can't touch it to activate it.

    Try this  - Reset the iPad by holding down on the Sleep and Home buttons at the same time for about 10-15 seconds until the Apple Logo appears - ignore the red slider - let go of the buttons. (This is equivalent to rebooting your computer.) No data/files will be erased.
     Cheers, Tom

  • How can I record a video with LAbview?

    Hi,
    I have a question: How can I record a video with labview?
    I have a camera (AXIS 221) connected via rj45 on PC. I see the video of the camera in a browser.
    And I would to acquire the video in labview.
    Could someone help me?
    Thanks
    Raf

    Unfortunately I haven't any experience with this camera. Iguess, you should install API, then crete new VI, place ActiveX container (palette Container->ActiveX) on the Front Panel, then right mouse click, then choose Insert ActiveX object..., then found you camera object and select it and press OK. Then you probably can see image from the on the front panel. Also probably you will be able to get image data in array (how easy is it - depends from the camera API).
    If you able to see image from camera in the Internet Explorer, then another method - you can put Microsoft Web Browser as ActiveX object, then you should also see the image. Disadvantage of this method - you will be not able to get image data.
    Andrey.

  • Raw video import

    Hi there,
    I use a canon M31 for my video recording. To date I have been importing a video into Imovie, then immediately exporting the full unedited video to a folder for safe keeping while I edit the original import.
    What I would like to do is save a step and copy the files from the canon flash memory straight to my hard drive, save them there and import them to imovie when i want to edit them. They are MTS files on the canon.
    Can someone recommend a converter that will convert the MTS files for import into Imovie? or will iMovie convert them upon import?
    Thanks in advance.
    Marc

    You should be able to use the Archive All function at the bottom of the normal imovie import screen.
    The Archive All function will make a copy of all the files on your sdhc card or hard drive so you can import later to imovie or the editor of your choice.
    Another way to do this is to create a disk image of your flash memory using Disk Utility, but since iMovie 09 introduced the archive function (continued in iMovie 11), I haven't needed the Disk Utility method.
    When you import into iMovie, either from your archive or directly from the card, iMovie will convert the AVCHD to Apple Intermediate Codec, which is editable.

  • Raw video for logging purposes

    Does anybody have a quick and easy way to deliver raw video to producers so they can log it?
    I'm constantly creating dvd's for producers that have hours of footage on it... and it takes forever! I'm hoping there's a way to deliver it to them on line. The quality doesn't have to be great. Just good enough so they can see the timecode of soundbites and b-roll.
    Thank you.

    Hi -
    Like Mr. Harbsmeier suggest above, I keep a cheap DVD recorder in my edit bay.
    I can quickly drag the clips to the timeline in order, slap a timecode reader filter on them and then play the output out to my Panasonic DVD recorder - I don't care if it drops an occasional frame or so as this is only for viewing. And it will even record up to 6 hours on a single DVD in super-duper compressed mode, which is certainly good enough for the clients to view and select takes from.
    This is the fastest way that I know of - make the DVD and FedEx or courier it off to the client.
    Making a real DVD, or compressing for use on and uploading to the web will all take much more time, IMHO.
    Hope this helps.

  • How do I archive the raw video files from my camcorder to ext hd?

    I have a couple hours of video sitting on my Canon Vixia HF S10 HD camcorder. I don't need to edit them in iMovie (at least for now) but I would like to keep those raw video files for use at a later date and get them off my camcorder. I want to put them on my external HD if that's the best thing to do. Does anybody know the best way forward with this task?
    Many thanks.

    Open iMovie. Attach your camera via USB. The iMovie Import Screen will come up. Do NOT click Import All. But at the bottom of the import screen, you will see a button that says ARCHIVE ALL. Push this button with your mouse and select a folder on your external drive to store the Archive. (and give it a name). [See here for a picture from Ken Stone's Tutorial|http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/imovie_09stone.html#acquiring]
    Later on, when you want to edit your movie, you can open iMovie and select FILE/IMPORT...FROM ARCHIVE, and import this into iMovie just as if your camera is attached.
    The first time you do it, I would recommend going through the whole procedure and importing a least some of the archive into an iMovie Event. Once you are sure it is working for you, you can delete the files on the camera.

  • My raw video won't play in CS5? HELP PLEASE!

    Ok I'm new to after effects and I just got ae cs5 for christmas. I just installed it and I wanted to do a test so I took some raw footage from my JVC HD3 Everio video camera. The raw video is in .TOD format and when i try to open it in ae cs5 it says its not supported! How can it not be supported in one of the best video editing software? what can i do? is there a fix? any help appreciated thank you!!!!!!!

    Apparently, TOD is a flavor of MPEG2, used by JVC HD cameras from 2009 or older.
    I found this which might help you (FYI, Google is your friend):
    http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/273031-Anyone-having-JVC-GZ-HD7-TOD-file-conversion-pro blems-compatibility
    From the above link:
    "Stage 1 - download all movie data (files & folders in 'SD_VIDEO') from HD7 via USB
    Stage 2 (Optional) - Rename files - I find e.g. 'MOV03A' in folder 'PRG007' not very helpful (also the 'hex' suffix (e.g. 03A) tends to confuse some sorting processes). Therefore I bulk rename using PFRANK (from http://www3.telus.net/pfrank/) this is all amatter of choice, but as an example I include Project name, shooting date & time (actually file date/time), and the original 'hex suffix' (just to allow any back-track) in the new name.
    Stage 3 - De-mux TOD file - the TOD file is an MPEG video file wrapped up in Transport Stream (TS) packet data. To remove the TS packet data I use MPEGStreamClip (from http://www.videohelp.com/tools/MPEG_StreamClip) & QuickTime Alternative (needed by MPEGStreamClip) (from http://www.filehippo.com/download_qu...ernative/?2615).
    Startup MPEGStreamClip and load the TOD files via List/BatchList and then select the 'Convert to MPEG with MP2 Audio' option, select the destination, and hey presto! - full-quality mpeg2 file(s)."
    Another link:
    http://www.knowledge-download.com/JVCHD7/index.html

  • Canon 1DC vs. 5DIII vs. C300 & Raw Video resolution comparison

    I bought the C300 and C100 for what I paid?? Raw video che C 100!! CANON
    Canon did not give me the raw video wc 100 oc 300 but the 5D II and III is tucked away for a long time ... bad Canoan
    In the battle of the 1080p cameras, the game has changed. Here’s how the 5D Mark III in raw recording mode compares to the best 1080p output from the Canon C300 and 1D C.
    The Canon C300 is a very good albeit highly priced $15,000 HD camera, producing an ultra clean and detailed image by oversampling from the same 4K sensor as the C500.
    It is the current benchmark, so interesting to see how close the 5D Mark III raw gets in 1080p.
    ue to the way the crop mode framing works in the current Magic Lantern build we couldn’t do a final 100% perfect chart test for the 1:1 mode so please treat that last image as a work in progress not a final result!
    The Panasonic GH2 is third best on this test, certainly closer to the C300 and 5D Mark III raw than the other cameras, which is astonishing considering the price difference.
    The 5D Mark III is slightly cleaner than the GH2, with less aliasing, especially horizontally but it’s still a good result for the GH2.
    The Sony FS100 seems to have a soft default output and a strong anti-aliasing filter. The 7D and NEX 5N are a big step down with plenty of moire.
    To summarise, I’d put the cameras in order of resolution at 1080p as follows:
    Canon C300
    Canon 5D Mark III Raw (1080p)
    Panasonic GH2
    Sony FS100
    Canon 7D
    Sony NEX 5N / VG20
    I’d tentatively say the 5D Mark III in raw 1:1 crop mode has the Canon C300 beaten for resolution, but more development is needed with Magic Lantern before we can say for sure with any finality. For all I know they could have a Super 35mm 4K crop working eventually, it’s too premature to judge the final resolution of the crop mode. Exciting times ahead!
    Canon 1D C
    The 1D C uses a 1:1 crop (at APS-H) to achieve it’s 4K image, a huge 4096 x 2160. The aspect ratio is slightly narrower than 16:9 and the sensor area used quite a bit less than the 5D Mark III raw in full frame mode.
    When you scale 4K on the 1D C down to 1080p you get cinema standard 2K (2048 x 1080) rather than the full HD TV standard 1920 x 1080.
    Here’s how the field of view differs between the 5D Mark III in raw (full frame) and the 1D C in 4K MJPEG mode (APS-H). Shot with a Zeiss 25mm F2.0 Distagon.
    You have to bear this in mind and how it affects your lenses. The 1.3x crop of the 1D C makes the Zeiss 25mm a rather less exciting 32mm, and the crop vertically is even more due to the narrower aspect ratio compared to 16:9 (or especially 3:2) on the 5D Mark III in raw.
    The 1D C and 1D X can do a full frame 1080p image too of course, but the 5D Mark III raw is a lot nicer and more detailed for that.
    So 4K is what the 1D C is all about for me.
    We shot in 4K Canon LOG, 1080p raw on the 5D Mark III and noticed a few interesting pros and cons for both cameras
    I feel the 5D Mark III in raw is both amazing and feature packed relative even to the professional $12k and $15k C-series offerings let alone other DSLRs. It is a dream for anamorphic shooters, offering very clean 2.5K anamorphic images with a 1280p vertical resolution. Various shooting aspect ratios such as 3:2 and 4:3 are not offered on the C-series cameras. To utilise the full height of a 3:2 full frame sensor is a genuinely new feature, as even the factory 5D Mark III crops the full sensor to 16:9 with the standard video mode. The Nikon D800 also crops the full frame sensor. With anamorphic on the 5D Mark III with raw you have a larger sensor recording area than any other DSLR on the market, and considerably different to Super 35mm, APS-C or the 1D C’s APS-H 4K MJPEG.
    The 1D C is of course top dog for resolution but the image cannot be graded with the freedom of raw, even from Canon Log. Colour and gradation, especially when it comes to skin-tones are better on the 5D Mark III with raw.
    The cleanness of the full frame 1080p mode is also excellent on the 5D Mark III in raw, ahead of any other DSLR on the market and so close to the $15,000 Canon C300 that in the real world it makes no difference. Only on the most demanding test chart could I tell.

    I bought the C300 and C100 for what I paid?? Raw video che C 100!! CANON
    Canon did not give me the raw video wc 100 oc 300 but the 5D II and III is tucked away for a long time ... bad Canoan
    In the battle of the 1080p cameras, the game has changed. Here’s how the 5D Mark III in raw recording mode compares to the best 1080p output from the Canon C300 and 1D C.
    The Canon C300 is a very good albeit highly priced $15,000 HD camera, producing an ultra clean and detailed image by oversampling from the same 4K sensor as the C500.
    It is the current benchmark, so interesting to see how close the 5D Mark III raw gets in 1080p.
    ue to the way the crop mode framing works in the current Magic Lantern build we couldn’t do a final 100% perfect chart test for the 1:1 mode so please treat that last image as a work in progress not a final result!
    The Panasonic GH2 is third best on this test, certainly closer to the C300 and 5D Mark III raw than the other cameras, which is astonishing considering the price difference.
    The 5D Mark III is slightly cleaner than the GH2, with less aliasing, especially horizontally but it’s still a good result for the GH2.
    The Sony FS100 seems to have a soft default output and a strong anti-aliasing filter. The 7D and NEX 5N are a big step down with plenty of moire.
    To summarise, I’d put the cameras in order of resolution at 1080p as follows:
    Canon C300
    Canon 5D Mark III Raw (1080p)
    Panasonic GH2
    Sony FS100
    Canon 7D
    Sony NEX 5N / VG20
    I’d tentatively say the 5D Mark III in raw 1:1 crop mode has the Canon C300 beaten for resolution, but more development is needed with Magic Lantern before we can say for sure with any finality. For all I know they could have a Super 35mm 4K crop working eventually, it’s too premature to judge the final resolution of the crop mode. Exciting times ahead!
    Canon 1D C
    The 1D C uses a 1:1 crop (at APS-H) to achieve it’s 4K image, a huge 4096 x 2160. The aspect ratio is slightly narrower than 16:9 and the sensor area used quite a bit less than the 5D Mark III raw in full frame mode.
    When you scale 4K on the 1D C down to 1080p you get cinema standard 2K (2048 x 1080) rather than the full HD TV standard 1920 x 1080.
    Here’s how the field of view differs between the 5D Mark III in raw (full frame) and the 1D C in 4K MJPEG mode (APS-H). Shot with a Zeiss 25mm F2.0 Distagon.
    You have to bear this in mind and how it affects your lenses. The 1.3x crop of the 1D C makes the Zeiss 25mm a rather less exciting 32mm, and the crop vertically is even more due to the narrower aspect ratio compared to 16:9 (or especially 3:2) on the 5D Mark III in raw.
    The 1D C and 1D X can do a full frame 1080p image too of course, but the 5D Mark III raw is a lot nicer and more detailed for that.
    So 4K is what the 1D C is all about for me.
    We shot in 4K Canon LOG, 1080p raw on the 5D Mark III and noticed a few interesting pros and cons for both cameras
    I feel the 5D Mark III in raw is both amazing and feature packed relative even to the professional $12k and $15k C-series offerings let alone other DSLRs. It is a dream for anamorphic shooters, offering very clean 2.5K anamorphic images with a 1280p vertical resolution. Various shooting aspect ratios such as 3:2 and 4:3 are not offered on the C-series cameras. To utilise the full height of a 3:2 full frame sensor is a genuinely new feature, as even the factory 5D Mark III crops the full sensor to 16:9 with the standard video mode. The Nikon D800 also crops the full frame sensor. With anamorphic on the 5D Mark III with raw you have a larger sensor recording area than any other DSLR on the market, and considerably different to Super 35mm, APS-C or the 1D C’s APS-H 4K MJPEG.
    The 1D C is of course top dog for resolution but the image cannot be graded with the freedom of raw, even from Canon Log. Colour and gradation, especially when it comes to skin-tones are better on the 5D Mark III with raw.
    The cleanness of the full frame 1080p mode is also excellent on the 5D Mark III in raw, ahead of any other DSLR on the market and so close to the $15,000 Canon C300 that in the real world it makes no difference. Only on the most demanding test chart could I tell.

  • How my clients can upload  raw video files to my linux server

    Any ideas or thoughts really welcome:
    I need to figure out a way or process for my clients to upload their raw video source files ( any known usual video formats and extensions) from their video cameras or devices or storage source  that is tied into or thru their computer with a firewire or USB 2+ connection    and then uploaded directly into my remote linux server.   my linux server hard drve space is not a problem..  
    Once client has finished uploading,  I would then download the resulting saved files to my computer for video/audio editing using Premiere 11
    I know that one restriction or problem would be their connection and ISP issues (throttling etc.) ,  My server permits basically unlimited up/download traffic,  so this should not be a problem and server has balancing.
    Do they need to use a typical ftp account and something like cuteftp???   however my understanding of FTP clients do not do streaming from a device????  yes or No??   I always thought just static files.....   aam I correct?
    how might my clients stream into my server.   i am wanting to set up an online video/audio editing website
    once i finish editing I would upload file probably as a zip file for them to unzip.  I can also build and send (mail)  out a DVD-CD or Blu-ray.  any other thoughts welcome on returning the finished edit.
    My tech people say that i cannot effectively load and operate Premiere onto my server to do the editing. 
    I would appreciate any feedback and ideas
    thanks

    How people upload files to your server is really a question for your server company... you need to find out from your server company how they handle permissions and uploads
    Yes, no current version of Premiere Pro or Elements is written to EITHER install on, or directly use files resident on a server
    No current version of Premiere works properly over a network
    -you may NOT "map" your My Documents folder to a network drive
    -you MUST give all users administrator accounts to use Premiere
    -you MAY also need to... http://forums.adobe.com/thread/969395
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/771151
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/851602
    -a work around, of sorts http://forums.adobe.com/thread/957523
    -and not on a "domain" http://forums.adobe.com/thread/858977
    -also PreEl see #5 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1017199
    -more PreEl problem http://forums.adobe.com/thread/975117
    Adobe Anywhere http://forums.adobe.com/message/4682127
    -Announced September 2012 for "future versions" of Premiere Pro
    -NO information on pricing or availability date
    Once you and your server company figure out permissions and the software your clients need to use for uploads, you will then need to download the files to your video data hard drive to edit

  • Heads up: I have started to use CR 7 for RAW video

    Just a heads up. Interesting times over at Magic Lantern, where they've cracked the Canon DSLR's to deliver RAW video. The resulting .RAW file is converted to a DNG sequence of custom dimensions. The way I develop these is just like I do my photos: I use Bridge to browse, open up a representative frame in CR, do my settings, and sync up the rest in Bridge. Then I use Image Processor to output a JPG sequence for final rendering in Premiere (I use premiere 5, but Photoshop CS6, that is why I dont import the DNG sequence directly in, say after effects or Premiere).
    Anyway, lots of people have suddenly started using Camera RAW for grading RAW video over the past week or so.
    Just wanted to let you know. Its pretty big news. Here's my first tests: https://vimeo.com/66414746

    It's much better to use After Effects to grade Canon RAW/DNG footage, as you can maintain a 100% nondestructive workflow.
    You can import a DNG frame sequence into After Effects (and it will display the ACR interface automatically, as if you were opening a single image in Photoshop). Whatever you 'develop' in ACR is applied identically to every frame, so yes there are problems if you do something like add grain as it'll produce a static pattern. That doesn't matter for stills, so nobody in the ACR team bothered to add a random seed to the grain function. Maybe if this workflow catches on we'll see it added to future versions, but right now you should add grain later with AE's effects.
    The DNG 'footage' always imports in 32-bit space even though the data from Canon's sensor isn't that deep. If you put it onto a 16-bit comp in AE you can adjust tone/exposure with the same effectiveness as the sliders in ACR, and the non-32 effects such as Add Grain will be happier. There's no real point working in 32-bit comps for these files unless you're doing something extreme. Replicating the shadow/highlight/clarity sliders with curves requires some skill, but you can get some amazing one-click effects on these DNG sequences from plugins such as MB Looks.
    Personally I would make the overall pre-grade in ACR (white balance, approximate exposure, lens correction) but I'd do everything else (denoise/curves/grade/grain) in AE once the footage is on the timeline (I'd apply a little bit of MB Denoiser II, then Colorista or Looks, then AE's Add Grain or MB MisFire). Note that you need to set the lens correction manually, as the DNGs from Raw2dng don't include the EXIF tags.
    One thing I've been asked is how to get the ACR dialog open again once the footage is imported to AE. You do that by right-clicking the footage in the project bin and choosing Interpret Footage > Main (Ctrl+Alt+G). On the dialog that appears, press the More Options button on the bottom left.
    btw - Premiere Pro CS6 does not import DNGs. A previous version did, but Adobe reduced their activities on the emerging CinemaDNG standard and removed the plugin.

  • Working with raw Microphone data...

    so I'm creating an audio recorder and I'm writing the floats from the SampleDataEvent to a byteArray.  Everything works fine locally, but we need to store these files on our server.  I have tried to use Sound.load with the url of the byteArray however I get an IO Error which I assume is prob. because this file is not an mp3.  What I need to do is either find out what type of file the byteArray actually is, so that we can have our backend re-encode from this file type to an mp3, or I need to convert on the front end, to an mp3 and just send that new byteArray along.  I found Thibalt's WaveEncoder library, but this encodes to Wav files, not mp3's.  Any help or suggestions out there about how to resolve this issue?
    Thanks,
    BK

    It is not in a popular format.  It is simply RAW audio data in FLOATS.
    A WAV file is really a container, not a format in it self, it can store multiple types of formats, with or without compression.
    Do note the second sentence.  A good part of audio conversion tools expect raw audio data to be in integers, while the raw data that you get from the mic is actually in FLOAT, which is not the same a DOUBLE.  Flash's Number is a Double.
    You also have to be carefull with Endianes of your ByteArray, as this is also very important.

Maybe you are looking for