Very low HD Performance

Hi,
Using arch a few days ago (Recent Instalation) I noticed that it was very slow, programs were taking quite some time to open, then I tested my HD performance with hdparm:
Cached Read is 680MB/s in Arch.
After this, I installed CentOS 5.0 and tested hdparm again:
Cached Read is 1700MB/s in CentOS.
Then I Tested hdparm in Ubuntu 7.04 and in Fedora 7 and:
Cached Read is ~ 622MB/s in both.
My problem is that I want Arch (Of course) with that HD performance found in CentOS.
I want some directions from you guys, I have already searched and tested this for a few days, but can´t make it work.
I can get needed data from bot, Centos or Arch.
Thank you!!
Last edited by William Koch (2007-09-19 16:52:03)

cactus wrote:
you likely have an ide hard drive, right?
You probably need to tune the hdparm settings a bit.
What is the output of hdparm -I /dev/sda 
Where sda is your drive.
My HD is a Serial ATA 5400RPM (My computer is a Notebook Toshiba Satellite A135-S2386)
hdparm -I /dev/sda in ArchLinux:
# hdparm -I /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: TOSHIBA MK8037GSX
Serial Number: 37NHF8VJS
Firmware Revision: DL230M
Standards:
Supported: 7 6 5 4
Likely used: 7
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 156301488
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 156301488
device size with M = 1024*1024: 76319 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 80026 MBytes (80 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Queue depth: 32
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16
Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0080)
DMA: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* SMART feature set
Security Mode feature set
* Power Management feature set
* Write cache
* Look-ahead
* Host Protected Area feature set
* WRITE_BUFFER command
* READ_BUFFER command
* NOP cmd
* DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE
* Advanced Power Management feature set
* SET_MAX security extension
* 48-bit Address feature set
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
* Mandatory FLUSH_CACHE
* FLUSH_CACHE_EXT
* SMART error logging
* SMART self-test
* General Purpose Logging feature set
* WRITE_{DMA|MULTIPLE}_FUA_EXT
* IDLE_IMMEDIATE with UNLOAD
* SATA-I signaling speed (1.5Gb/s)
* Native Command Queueing (NCQ)
* Host-initiated interface power management
* Phy event counters
DMA Setup Auto-Activate optimization
Device-initiated interface power management
* Software settings preservation
* SMART Command Transport (SCT) feature set
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
46min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT.
Checksum: correct
hdparm -I /dev/sda in CentOS:
# hdparm -I /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: TOSHIBA MK8037GSX
Serial Number: 37NHF8VJS
Firmware Revision: DL230M
Standards:
Supported: 7 6 5 4
Likely used: 7
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 156301488
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 156301488
device size with M = 1024*1024: 76319 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 80026 MBytes (80 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Queue depth: 32
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16
Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0080)
DMA: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* SMART feature set
Security Mode feature set
* Power Management feature set
* Write cache
* Look-ahead
* Host Protected Area feature set
* WRITE_BUFFER command
* READ_BUFFER command
* NOP cmd
* DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE
* Advanced Power Management feature set
* SET_MAX security extension
* 48-bit Address feature set
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
* Mandatory FLUSH_CACHE
* FLUSH_CACHE_EXT
* SMART error logging
* SMART self-test
* General Purpose Logging feature set
* WRITE_{DMA|MULTIPLE}_FUA_EXT
* IDLE_IMMEDIATE with UNLOAD
* SATA-I signaling speed ( 1.5Gb/s)
* Native Command Queueing (NCQ)
* Host-initiated interface power management
* Phy event counters
DMA Setup Auto-Activate optimization
Device-initiated interface power management
* Software settings preservation
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
46min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT.
Checksum: correct
hdparm -tT /dev/sda in ArchLinux:
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 680 MB in 2.00 seconds = 340.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 130 MB in 3.04 seconds = 42.74 MB/sec
hdparm -tT /dev/sda in CentOS:
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1632 MB in 2.00 seconds = 816.36 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 130 MB in 3.03 seconds = 42.85 MB/sec
Could it be some new driver, or something that has changed recently, CentOS is RHEL based, it uses older programs/drivers/kernel.
Thank you!
Last edited by William Koch (2007-09-19 21:09:01)

Similar Messages

  • Very low video performance

    Hello everyone. I have an intel gma 950 video card and I think it's not performing as it should.
    From what I've read here at the forums, this card should be getting ~1200 FPS in glxgears (a couple of owners of this same card reported that). Mine is getting about ~750. 
    I really don't know how to tweak my xorg.conf anymore so please help me. Maybe the owners of said video card could let me see their xorg.conf ?
    Here's mine:
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    Option "AIGLX" "true"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    RgbPath "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "glx"
    #Load "GLcore"
    Load "dri"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "xtrap"
    Load "record"
    Load "freetype"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    #DisplaySize 330 210 # mm
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "CMO"
    ModelName "1526"
    HorizSync 31.5 - 70
    VertRefresh 60
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "NoAccel" # [<bool>]
    #Option "SWcursor" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ColorKey" # <i>
    #Option "CacheLines" # <i>
    #Option "Dac6Bit" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DRI" # [<bool>]
    #Option "NoDDC" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ShowCache" # [<bool>]
    #Option "XvMCSurfaces" # <i>
    #Option "PageFlip" # [<bool>]
    Option "NoAccel" "false"
    #Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "true"
    Option "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
    Option "DRI" "true"
    #Option "DDC" "true"
    #Option "XVideo" "true"
    #Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
    Option "AccelMethod" "XAA"
    Option "TripleBuffer" "True"
    #Option "Legacy3D" "false"
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "intel"
    VendorName "Intel Corporation"
    BoardName "Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller"
    BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
    EndSection
    Section "DRI"
    Group 0
    Mode 0666
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Extensions"
    Option "Composite" "Enable"
    Option "RENDER" "Enable"
    Option "GLX" "Enable"
    EndSection

    Hmm, triple buffer doesn't seem to make a difference because enabling it was the last thing I tried, but no matter what I do, my FPS stays at ~750.....isn't that strange ? I know I've seen several posts here from Intel gma 950 owners that they get around ~1200 FPS.....
    Although,
    glxinfo | grep direct
    does return
    direct rendering: Yes
    Thanks for the response anyway....
    EDIT: Just tried disabling triple buffer and the composite extension, and glxgears still returns the same result! I just don't get it
    Last edited by moljac024 (2008-02-08 10:33:36)

  • Very low network performance (Solaris8)!

    I'm using two Solaris8(4/01) PC.
    Each PC consists of ASUS CUSL2-M (this mother board is listed in HCL) which has 3Com 3C920 onboard network controller.
    I tested the network thoughput between them by the netperf, I got only 2.7M bit per sec!
    I also tested following:
    Solaris8(3C920) - Solaris8(Intel Pro/100) 2.6Mbps
    Solaris8(3C920) - Linux(Dec tulip) 81.2Mbps
    What's wrong? Configuration problem? Device failure? Or driver problem?
    Anyone tell me the solution, please.
    Thanks, yuki.

    Well, in Netstat>Display Comprehensive Network Statistics for eac Protocol, the first one should be TCP:, and should look something like this...
    tcp:
    3371399 packets sent
    807507 data packets (593976003 bytes)
    18944 data packets (16877557 bytes) retransmitted
    1 resend initiated by MTU discovery
    2373294 ack-only packets (4 delayed)
    0 URG only packets
    32 window probe packets
    33802 window update packets
    137834 control packets
    3103297 packets received
    639050 acks (for 593661354 bytes)
    64836 duplicate acks
    0 acks for unsent data
    2256151 packets (2648078820 bytes) received in-sequence
    10197 completely duplicate packets (9475948 bytes)
    137 old duplicate packets
    727 packets with some dup. data (330463 bytes duped)
    153229 out-of-order packets (187771644 bytes)
    0 packets (0 bytes) of data after window
    0 window probes
    15843 window update packets
    568 packets received after close
    210 discarded for bad checksums
    0 discarded for bad header offset fields
    0 discarded because packet too short
    104937 connection requests
    470 connection accepts
    0 bad connection attempts
    0 listen queue overflows
    37590 connections established (including accepts)
    118775 connections closed (including 1322 drops)
    745 connections updated cached RTT on close
    745 connections updated cached RTT variance on close
    106 connections updated cached ssthresh on close
    67803 embryonic connections dropped
    635781 segments updated rtt (of 665339 attempts)
    30918 retransmit timeouts
    275 connections dropped by rexmit timeout
    37 persist timeouts
    0 connections dropped by persist timeout
    2828 keepalive timeouts
    0 keepalive probes sent
    2100 connections dropped by keepalive
    166226 correct ACK header predictions
    2074205 correct data packet header predictions
    Perhaps Info would be easier...
    Does it list any Recieve Errors or Collisions?

  • Photoshop CC2014 very low printing performance.

    Hello.
    After upgrading from CS2 and CS3 to CC2014 Photoshop and Illustrator send each copie separate to the printer.
    Originally the .PSD has 63MB but it gets send to the printer 10 times instead off one and copying it 10 times like it used to work under CS2 and CS3
    I already tried to use the latest printing driver without success. It is a Canon IR ADV C5250i.

    Here is a great video explaining the issue:
    I would recommend a resolution at 300dpi, but that is often dependant on the image you are printing. I often set it at 300ppi for a photo quality.
    Here is the link if the video doesn't display: http://psd.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-tips/pixels-image-size-resolution-photoshop/
    I hope that helps, please post back with any questions
    Janelle

  • Select single to RSEG with very low performance

    Hello experts,
    We have recently upgraded our sap basis from 701 to 740 and we are experiencing a very low performance with the following abap instruction:
    select single * from rseg into lw_rseg where ebeln = lw_output-pedido and
                                                                ebelp = lw_output-item and
                                                                kschl = lw_output-kschl.
    Could it be anything from the upgrade?
    Any suggestions?
    If we change the "*" for only one field of the RSEG table, would the improvement in te performance be significant?
    Thank you.
    Best regards,
    Raquel Oliveira

    Hi, Raquel!
    In SELECT statement you are not using the key fields for RSEG table.
    Replacing "*" by a single field won't do the trick.
    In our system we've got a table index on EBELN and EBELP fields in RSEG and it helps a lot.
    In case you don't want to set additional indexes you can find all incoming invoices for the purchasing document items in EKBE table and then go to RSEG having BELNR, GJAHR and BUZEI fields.
    If you already have table index on RSEG with EBELN & EBELP fields - you can trace SQL statement in ST05 and check whether it uses the index.
    And apart from that - anything can be from upgrade

  • Very Low performance Firewire

    Hi
    First.. sorry for Bad translating.
    i notes very low performance of my FW800/400 (i think after EFI/SMC Firmware Update)
    FW800/400 More slowly the USB2 and FW800 cannot see External Devices that working fine with my macbook pro.

    Hey Noorldin,
    I think I have a similar problem. I have always had some issues with the ports (owned the MacPro since the first month it came out) but several months ago things took a turn for the worse. External harddrives no longer work properly. USB drives won't mount, firewire drives will mount but the transfer rate is roughly 1MB a sec and after ~10 MB I get an error and the transfer stops. Other peripherals work for the most part but not well. My external usb microphone will not stop receiving audio signals when turned off and my canon HV20 drops frames during transfers. My awesome fujitsu scansnap scanner, printer, and usb mouse transmitter all work fine though. I used to be able to play many 1080p videos at the same time, now I can not play one without frames dropping even when booted into a new clean internal HDD. The MacPro will only sleep if I manually set it to sleep. The autosleep feature will have the internal hdds spinning up and down all night.
    I spent 20 min on hold to get an Apple rep and then 47 min on hold to get an Apple Specialist. The specialist was very kind and tried many things with me. In the end, the specialist concluded that my Logic board or CPUs were most likely bad and that I should get them tested and possibly replaced. You may need the same.
    One weird thing I tried just the other night was to unplug all USB and Firewire devices, including my 30 in display and wireless mouse hub, and then I plugged in just one firewire hdd. It worked fine!? So, I will continue testing on my own for a while and let you know what I find out from my tests or from the Apple repairs, as I have only seen one other person with an issue like mine and what I believe might be yours too. I have seen many issues with the front ports not working right though.

  • Speaker very low sound

    The speaker of my HP slate 10 is very low...please help me!
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Dear Customer,
    Welcome to HP Support Forum and we are glad to assist you.
    It looks like you are having difficulties with regards to the volume of the Table [HP Slate 10]
    Please try rebooting the Table once to check if that resolves the issue
    OR
    How does your Slate perform with just audio files using the Play Music app?  And, have you tried playing a movie trailer from Google Play?  Just tap on a movie title and play the trailer by tapping on the > arrow.
    What about if you use earphones?
    Do you ear system sounds?  Go into Settings>Sounds>Touch Sounds where there is a checkbox on the right indicating whether Touch Sounds are on or off.
    The speakers on the Slate aren't all that, but they do produce sound that's loud enough to listen to TV shows and movies.  If you can't get enough volume from them with other apps such as Play Music, there may be a hardware issue.
    A couple other suggestions...try restarting it.  And back to earphones, try inserting an earphone plug all the way in, and removing it.
    Hope this helps, for any further queries reply to the post and feel free to join us again
    **Click the KUDOS star on left to say Thanks**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.
    Thank You,
    K N R K
    I work on behalf of HP

  • Very Low Disk Warning

    I recently received a Very Low Disk warning. I have seen this before on other macs when I perform a "Erase Free Space" operation on the Disk Utility. However, I was not doing that now. I appear to have about 45 gig of free space on my MacBook Pro. It appears that the warning came about 17 minutes after a Time Machine backup completed. Any ideas as to why this might pop up.
    Here is my free space:
    $ df -h
    Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
    /dev/disk0s2 186Gi 140Gi 46Gi 76% /
    devfs 108Ki 108Ki 0Bi 100% /dev
    fdesc 1.0Ki 1.0Ki 0Bi 100% /dev
    map -hosts 0Bi 0Bi 0Bi 100% /net
    map auto_home 0Bi 0Bi 0Bi 100% /home
    /dev/disk1s3 931Gi 445Gi 487Gi 48% /Volumes/Backup1
    Here is the last bunch of messages from my Console (All Messages):
    2/11/09 8:20:02 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Copied 15611 files (17.0 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    2/11/09 8:20:13 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] No pre-backup thinning needed: 1.25 GB requested (including padding), 486.50 GB available
    2/11/09 8:20:48 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Copied 15800 files (5.0 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    2/11/09 8:20:57 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Starting post-backup thinning
    2/11/09 8:22:13 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Deleted backup /Volumes/Backup1/Backups.backupdb/burns/2009-02-10-072449: 486.52 GB now available
    2/11/09 8:22:46 AM iChatAgent[179] [SASL] Level 5: DIGEST-MD5 client step 2
    2/11/09 8:23:32 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Deleted backup /Volumes/Backup1/Backups.backupdb/burns/2009-02-10-062810: 486.54 GB now available
    2/11/09 8:23:32 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Post-back up thinning complete: 2 expired backups removed
    2/11/09 8:23:32 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[6621] Backup completed successfully.
    2/11/09 8:40:27 AM KernelEventAgent[36] tid 00000000 received VQ_LOWDISK event (4)
    2/11/09 8:40:27 AM KernelEventAgent[36] tid 00000000 type 'hfs', mounted on '/', from '/dev/disk0s2', low disk
    2/11/09 8:40:27 AM KernelEventAgent[36] tid 00000000 found 1 filesystem(s) with problem(s)
    2/11/09 8:40:27 AM KernelEventAgent[36] tid 00000001 displaylowdiskwarning: generating warning for volume 'Macintosh HD'
    2/11/09 8:40:57 AM KernelEventAgent[36] tid 00000001 displaylowdiskwarning: warning for volume 'Macintosh HD' removed
    Thanks.

    Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda3 9.4G 8.8G 152M 99% /
    I would say that it's pretty low disk space.
    Partitioning is a personal thing, it depends on how much you install. Some need only 5 GB, some need e.g. 40 GB.
    Last edited by karol (2011-01-19 04:27:22)

  • Very low on system memory warning with plenty of memory left

    Hi,
    I am using Premiere Elements 7 on Windows XP, AMD 3GHz dual core with 4GB memory. I create DVDs based on AVCHD files from a Canon HF100, almost no editing, 1 hour of DVD content (8 GB worth of AVCHD files) . I have done this with the same configuration in the past without problems, but lately Premiere has been very unstable, either crashing outright or giving me the following warning:
    Adobe Premiere Elements is running very low on system memory. Please save your project and proceed with caution.
    When I try to burn a DVD, this warning is always shows within minutes, followed by a transcoding error. I tried everything to free up more space, nothing else significant is running on my machine, and I have exited most other background processes. When the above warning is shown, physical memory consumption is is reported as following:
    Commit Charge: 1.8 GB
    Premiere Elements process: 1.1 GB
    Free memory: 1.5 GB
    I also have virtual memory set to 8GB. Premiere scratch directories are on a disk with 500GB free space. I uninstalled and reinstalled Premiere, but no improvement.
    Other relevant software on my machine, some of it installed after I had my last successful DVD burn:
    Norton 360 2010 (Disabled Firewall and Autoprotect)
    Adobe Web Premium CS3
    Adobe Lightroom 2.5
    Copernic Desktop Search (Disabled)
    A number of free video tools, like HandBrake, AutoGK, AVISynth, VobSub, DVD Decrypter, Xvid
    Tivo Desktop (Disabled)
    iTunes (Disabled)
    Could there be any side effect from the other software? Any potential hardware problems I should investigate? Everything else works perfectly, including the other Adobe products.
    I very much appreciate your help, Premiere is unusable at the moment and I have some DVDs I desperately want to create.
    Thanks,
    Alex

    Have you rendered your timeline?
    If you're sceneline mode, switch to timeline mode. Is there a red line above your clips? If so, press Enter and let the program render your timeline (the red line will turn green).
    This should greatly improve your program's stability and performance.
    Also, ensure that the disc where you are storing your video files is formatted NTFS and not FAT32 (as they are when they come from the factory). FAT32 drives have a file size limit that can choke video work.
    And, if this 500 gig drive is not your C drive, ensure that your C drive also has at least 30-50 gigs of free space, freshly defragmented and with its temp files regularly cleared.

  • Very low signal strength when using DLINK 2640t with mac mini

    i have a mac mini and i have been using it fine with a 2wire wireless modem. However i have just switched to a Dlink 2640t (54Mbps (802.11g) Wireless ADSL 2/2+ Router with Built-in Modem, 4-port 10/100Mbps Switch) and have been getting very low signal strengths on my mac mini, resulting in me not being able to surf the internet. The modem+ router is located in the next room. Does anyone know whether its the problem with the modem router or mac mini's airport wireless problems with the router itself. It worked perfectly fine with my previous 2wire wireless modem
    please help!

    Did you reset the router after you updated router's firmware? Its always recommended to perform a reset after firmware upgrade on the router.
    Please refer to the link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=eaa3127db5f4402584c959a7251e754c_4008.xml&pid=80&r...
    For wireless range and signal issues, try changing the channel on the router to either 1,6,9 or 11.
    Please refer to this link on changing wireless channel and SSID (network name)
    http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=a0fb6c64337e47eb9e3e1027f364e70c_154.xml&pid=80&re...

  • Audio very low

    I have issued with audio 
    the audio in my notebook is very low 

    Hello zain_9274,
    Welcome to the HP Forums!
    I understand the audio is low on your notebook. Have you tried turning it up?
    Seriously, you can turn up the volume on the bottom right-hand corner of the screen where the speaker is. Each program can also increase its own volume.
    If you still require assistance, please provide the following information:
    1. The computer's model number. If you require assistance locating this information, please reference this website: Guide to finding your notebook product number
    2. The computer's operating system. If you require assistance locating this information, please reference this website to determine your Windows operating system.
    3. Does this occur on certain programs, or all programs?
    4. Have you installed any new software or drivers on this computer, before the issue appeared?
    Additionally, if the issue just began occurring, I would perform a system restore. I want you to bring the computer back to the earliest restore point possible, in an attempt to dodge whatever caused the issue. Here is a document on how to perform a System Restore: System Restore
    Thanks
    Mario
    I worked on behalf of HP.

  • Very low audio quality after amber update

    After installing amber update audio quality and volume has dropped significantly! Volume through speakers is alot lower, and when plugged into headphones audio lacks quality and depth. There is barely any bass and volume is very low, sounds like listening to a clock radio very disappointing, as audio quality on my 920 was very very good the best of any phone so far before amber update!

    i haven't noticed that with my 920. have you tried performing a soft reset and also check that you are up to date with all the latest Nokia system app updates from the Store?

  • 2012 R2 DirectAccess with very low client throughput

    I have a three-node Windows NLB Server 2012 R2 DirectAccess farm.  These three single purpose servers have good specs (8 cores, 32GB RAM, etc etc).  The problem that I am seeing is that the clients all have very low throughput on each session (between
    6 and 8 MBit "aka 1 MByte" per second).  This performance spec is linear since for each concurrent client that you add their throughput is also in that range.  Clients are all high-spec notebooks with Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64.  Performance
    on these clients is excellent except when transiting the DirectAccess server.  If the same client connects through AnyConnect VPN their throughput is excellent.  Additionally, when clients connect to the DA server plugged into the external traffic
    switch (aka same network as the DA external interface) the performance is identical so this isn't a WAN performance issue.  The utilization on all devices (DA servers, DA clients, network hardware) is very low so it does not appear to be a resource problem. 
    I confirmed that NULL CIPHER is used on clients so the traffic isn't being double encrypted.  This NLB started life 2 years ago as a Windows Server 2012 environment on different hardware and I've had the exact same issue.  It works "ok"
    but not the throughput that the capacity planning documentation indicates.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Mark Ringo

    Hi Mark,
    Which transition technologies does the client use to connect the DirectAccess Server?
    Using IP-HTTPS for DirectAccess connectivity has higher overhead and lower performance than Teredo. If the DirectAccess client is using IP-HTTPS instead of Teredo, the DirectAccess client will have a lower performance connection.
    When examining performance issues, one of the first places to look is the display of the
    ipconfig command on the DirectAccess server, which indicates the type of encapsulation based on the interface that has a global IPv6 address assigned.
    For detailed information, please refer to the link below,
    DirectAccess Client Connection is Slow
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee844161(v=WS.10).aspx
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee
    TechNet Community Support

  • Speed dropping to very low levels continually

    Hi!
    I have this wireless router for about a week now.   I have rarely been able to operate at the 54mbps capacity.  It continually rises and drops - sometimes to very low levels and it is REALLY frustrating.
    I have Cox cable in California as an internet provider.    I have the router protected by WEP. 
    Does anyone have this problem too, or know what could be causing this?
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    I have a second issue that I will post separate regarding Vonage compability.
    Thanks.
    Kate

    Try this info I found another website:
    I have found the fix to this problem. I had forgotten the "tcp receive window" size issue of yore (usually called RWIN). Win XP is supposed to dynamically manage this parameter to allow maximum performance, but in my case that did not happen for the wireless network adapter. My RWIN was sitting at 17520, which is too low for a 6Mbps internet connection with even average latency. I boosted it to 65700 and eventually to 131400 and am now seeing wireless internet download speeds equal to wired speeds. In my case both are averaging around 5.5Mbps with peak data rates of 6.6Mbps (the cable modem cap).
    Based on my experience, I suspect many folks with high bandwidth connections (>1.5Mbps) may not be getting the wireless performance they should.
    There are a number of sites with information on how to measure, optimize and set the RWIN parameter. Here are a few:
    http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks
    http://www.dslreports.com/drtcp
    http://forums.speedguide.net/showthread.php?t=73799
    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314053
    "You tried your best and you failed miserably! "

  • Very Low Connection with WRT54GS / WMP54GS

    I have a WRT54GS Router in one brick building and a WMP54GS adapter about 60 ft. away in another brick building. What is the effective range in this situation. I'm getting a "very Low" signal.  Also, I had problems setting this network up. In order to get the adapter to work I had to change the channel on the router from (default 6) to channel 2. Does this have something to do with my low signal? Any help would be appreciated!
    Thanks

    the 3 channels that do not interfere with each other are 1,6 and 11. 6 is the cleanest channel being in the middle of the band, but is the most popular. have you tried using only the windows utility to manage your wireless connection? this has been known to rectify poor wireless performance.
    Regards, Carl.
    www.thibor.co.uk
    Hyperwrt Dev for the WRT300N, WRTSL54GS, WRT54GS/G/GL

Maybe you are looking for