Vision builder AI engine takes so long to launch .

Hi all i am using Vision builder for my application .
(labview as api)
here i am using multiple Vision builder files .
if i do program like
(lauch - inspect ) together i takes (3000ms)
(launch ) intiall then inspect only means (300 ms)
for singple .vbai file its okay ..
in case of multiple .vbai files. the AI engine launch takes many time .(due to multiple Ai engines).
Help me to use of multiple files at a time . effiently

I remember when AI used to take forever to launch. Now I run in 64-bit, and since AI updates it is reasonably faster at launch. Are you running your iMac in 64-bit? or 32?

Similar Messages

Patch R12 on T4 engine takes a long time

Hi All,
I have patched R12 64bit (patch 8919491) on T4-1 machine takes a long time (not completed after 40 hours).
ram 16, sga 2g, another init.ora I set default, idle cpu concumption 99%
message alert.log : Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x3.1afee1.0], current log tail at RBA [0x3.1aff77.0]
please help

Hi Husein,
Thank you for your help.
I run adpatch as instruction on Readme.txt 8919491.
here are status 16 of workers:
96 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 48423 May 9 07:06 adwork004.log
134 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 67870 May 9 07:04 adwork007.log
148 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 74786 May 9 07:04 adwork005.log
124 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 63411 May 9 07:04 adwork008.log
54 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 27221 May 8 21:00 adwork002.log
162 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 82239 May 8 21:00 adwork003.log
224 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 102927 May 8 21:00 adwork001.log
16 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 7809 May 8 21:00 adwork012.log
14 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 7037 May 8 21:00 adwork014.log
14 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 7037 May 8 21:00 adwork013.log
20 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 9746 May 8 21:00 adwork011.log
14 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 7037 May 8 21:00 adwork015.log
20 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 10140 May 8 21:00 adwork010.log
68 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 34358 May 8 21:00 adwork006.log
22 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 10493 May 8 21:00 adwork009.log
14 -rw-r--r-- 1 oradev dba 7037 May 8 21:00 adwork016.log
I'll send you 2 workers status are adwork004.log and adwork016.log:
1. adwork004.log :
The Index in xdf-file and db match perfectly. No alteration necessary.
Index WF_USER_ROLE_ASSIGNMENTS_N3 exists under APPLSYS schema.
Checking for differences
Column_name and Uniqueness match for both file and DB Indexes
The Index in xdf-file and db match perfectly. No alteration necessary.
Index WF_USER_ROLE_ASSIGNMENTS_N4 does not exist in APPLSYS.
Skipping the creation of index WF_USER_ROLE_ASSIGNMENTS_N4 in current mode.
Index WF_USER_ROLE_ASSIGNMENTS_U1 exists under APPLSYS schema.
Checking for differences
Column_name and Uniqueness match for both file and DB Indexes
The Index in xdf-file and db match perfectly. No alteration necessary.
Performing AOL meta data updates
Attempting to update fnd tablespace meta data
Upload of Fnd_Object_Tablespaces is successful
AOL metadata updated successfully.
==========================================================
Done calling the utility function. Return Code = [0] TimeStamp = [Wed May 08 21:01:01 WIT 2013]
Updating task with status 0
Time when worker completed job: Wed May 08 2013 21:01:01
AdjavaWorker has reached the maximum wait timeout specified( 36000000 ). So Exiting.
2. adwork016.log :
Reading language and territory information from file...
Reading language information from applUS.txt ...
Temporarily resetting CLASSPATH to:
"/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/java/adjava.zip:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/u01/oracle/oradev/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes"
Calling /u01/oracle/oradev/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/bin/java ...
Exception in thread "main" java.sql.SQLException: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.logon(T4CConnection.java:412)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.PhysicalConnection.<init>(PhysicalConnection.java:531)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.<init>(T4CConnection.java:221)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CDriverExtension.getConnection(T4CDriverExtension.java:32)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:503)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:582)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:185)
at oracle.apps.ad.worker.AdJavaWorker.getAppsConnection(AdJavaWorker.java:1041)
at oracle.apps.ad.worker.AdJavaWorker.main(AdJavaWorker.java:276)
Caused by: oracle.net.ns.NetException: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection
at oracle.net.nt.ConnStrategy.execute(ConnStrategy.java:359)
at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAndExecute(AddrResolution.java:422)
at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.establishConnection(NSProtocol.java:672)
at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.connect(NSProtocol.java:237)
It's mean my machine is not enought for 16 workers ?
please help

Upgraded to OSX 10.9.1 and now Pages (iWork '08) takes much longer to launch.

Initial launch of Pages takes significantly longer to load after upgrading OSX. I have used 'software update', but nothing out there to download. Any ideas? The other components of my iWork '08 bundle work as expected, it is only Pages that seems to have performance issues under OSX 10.9.1.

If I remember, I believe I thought I had to upgrade to Mavericks for a feature related to sharing or FaceTime or something. I have an iMac, 2 MacBook Pro laptops (kids), an iPad (wife's) and Apple TV. So on Mavericks, everyone in the house is happy now; I just don't like that it takes 'forever' to launch Pages. Perhaps I will upgrade to iWork '09 to see if that takes care of the issue.

Why does Illustrator CC 2014.1 take so long to launch?

I work on an iMac and use OS X Yosemite. Every time I launch Illustrator CC 2014.1 it takes 11 minutes to open.
Does anyone else have this issue?

I remember when AI used to take forever to launch. Now I run in 64-bit, and since AI updates it is reasonably faster at launch. Are you running your iMac in 64-bit? or 32?

Takes too long to launch

My AI CS3 takes 2 minutes + to launceh on G5 Dual 2.5 PPC with 5 gig of Ram..
Is this normal for AI. Can you guys post time it launches here.
Perhaps for AI, PS, ID, etc.
Thanks. all..

Verify/repair the startup disk (not just permissions), as described here:
The Repair functions of Disk Utility: what's it all about?
Go to Apple Menu > System Preferences > Network, choose Network Port Configurations from the Show popup menu, and make sure that the configuration used to connect to Internet appears at the top of the list. Leave checked (enabled) only the port configuration needed to connect to Internet and Built-in Ethernet (in that order if not the same), uncheck (disable) the rest of network port configurations, and see whether that helps — if it doesn’t, turn ON again the ones you want enabled.
Finally, try launching Mail under the following conditions (you may need to force quit it first if it’s running) and post back with your observations:
1. Holding the Shift key down until the main window appears. This tells Mail to not select any mailboxes or load any messages upon start up.
2. With no Internet connection.

Mail takes too long to launch, hangs computer

For some reason, MAIL is the only app causing this problem. When I launch it, my computer freezes for about 20 seconds while Mail revs up, and once it's open everything's OK. But the extreme launch time is a problem.
I don't want to delete the com.apple.mail preference file because it resets everything in the mailbox & eliminates my folders.
Has anyone had a similar problem, and is there a fix?

Verify/repair the startup disk (not just permissions), as described here:
The Repair functions of Disk Utility: what's it all about?
Go to Apple Menu > System Preferences > Network, choose Network Port Configurations from the Show popup menu, and make sure that the configuration used to connect to Internet appears at the top of the list. Leave checked (enabled) only the port configuration needed to connect to Internet and Built-in Ethernet (in that order if not the same), uncheck (disable) the rest of network port configurations, and see whether that helps — if it doesn’t, turn ON again the ones you want enabled.
Finally, try launching Mail under the following conditions (you may need to force quit it first if it’s running) and post back with your observations:
1. Holding the Shift key down until the main window appears. This tells Mail to not select any mailboxes or load any messages upon start up.
2. With no Internet connection.

Muse CC startup takes too long (up to 35 seconds)

For some reason, Muse CC takes too long to launch: up to 35 seconds. The splash screen stays up for that long until the program actually starts.
Photoshop CC, with several plug-ins and presets, takes only 3 seconds. My previous Muse versions launched a lot faster.
I'm on Windows 7, 64 bit. Any recommendations on this? Anybody else experiencing this issue?

Please try to clear Muse's preferences/cache as detailed in the following article and see if that helps.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5086018#5086018
Thanks,
Vinayak

Labview 7.0 is compatable with Labview Imaq6.1 , vision builder 6.0 and Imaq run time engine 6.0.

Sir,
My system is PXI 8174 and i an using NI 1411 card for my application. I want to know the compatability of the softwares. Whether Labview 7 is compatable with Labview Imaq 6.1 , vision builder 6.0 and Imaq run time engine 6.0.

Hi,
Assuming you meant IMAQ Vision 6.1 instead of IMAC 6.1, this software was intended to run on LabVIEW 5.1, 6.0, and 6.1. I have heard of it being used with LabVIEW 7 on occasion, so it may be possible to make it work, but this has not been tested and is not officially supported. Vision Builder 6.0 should run; however, it was developed long before LabVIEW 7.x and will not generated code for LabVIEW 7.0 and later. The Vision RTE version should correspond to the version of Vision you are using. For instance, if the program was developed with Vision 6.1, the computer should have the Vision 6.1 RTE installed. With this being said, if you plan to use LabVIEW 7, I recommend updating your other software.
Regards,
Ryan M.
Applications Engineer

Application build takes very long time

Recently building applications has started taking a very long time. Before, similar applications took 30 seconds or less for a build, but currently 5-10 minutes is not uncommon.
The perplexing part is how the time is distributed. The builder will spend 3-5 minutes each on the first two "processing" tasks it undertakes, namely:
Processing NI_AALPro.lvlib...
Processing NI_Gmath.lvlib...
Which amount for about 1% of the progress bar. Once it finished processing these two libraries, the final 99% finishes in about 3 seconds.
Has anyone run into this issue before? I suspect I've misplaced files for the two libraries causing the hangup and the builder is having to go searching for them, but I don't know how to remedy this situation. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

I find that when I include DAQmx in my build it can take up to 30 minutes to build an Installer. I have not seen this with builds that dont include DAQmx though.
CLA, CLED, CTD,CPI, LabVIEW Champion
Platinum Alliance Partner
Senior Engineer
Using LV 2013, 2012
Don't forget Kudos for Good Answers, and Mark a solution if your problem is solved.

NI-1744 Smart Cameras go offline using Vision Builder AI and LV2010?

I've run into a perplexing and frustrating problem.
I have a set of 6 NI-1744 smart cameras used to monitor sample motion in an automated system
A central robot moves samples between 6 satellite chambers; there is a camera mounted above the entrance to each of the satellites; the sample carriers are drilled with up to 10 holes encoding their numbers in binary (0-1023). There is also an L-shaped registration mark drilled near the region for the number encoding. Matters are complicated somewhat in that the second generation of carriers has a slightly more complicated registration mark (which includes the simple L of the first generation).
What I would like to accomplish is this:
Most of the time, I just want to be able to see what's under each camera, illuminating from above using a ring light attached to the camera. Call that Inspection A.
I may need to capture an image without the ring light. Call that Inspection B
When a sample transfer is occurring, I need to run a more complicated inspection (Inspection C):
A light is turned on underneath the end of the sample transfer arm (the "fork"), backlighting the region where the hole pattern would be if a carrier is in fact present.
Acquire an image of the fork with the backlight on.
Check to see if the image shows the fork to be empty. If so, return that information and the inspection is complete.
If not, look for the (backlit) registration mark and establish a coordinate system for the holes. Look to see which holes are present, calculate the sample number, return the data and the inspection is complete
If not, look for the 2nd gen registration mark. If it is found, establish the coordinates as in step 4, calculate the number, return the data and complete.
If none of the registration patterns are found, turn on the ring light, capture an image and return it so the operator can intervene and enter the appropriate data.
I have successfully built the inspection, and it appears to work in the Vision Builder configuration interface, or if run from the Vision Builder inspection interface. If I attempt to *use* the inspection, accessing it via the VBAI interface in Labview, one or more of the cameras will hang after one or more inspections and stops responding to LabVIEW. It will take multiple reboots to get it back on line and visible to either VB or Labview.
Originally, I had thought to configure the camera to run inspections continously and select inspection A, B, or C based on a variable I could access using the Labview Shared Variable Engine. Every time I tried that the camera in question would hang. My current sort-of-successful software uses the VBAI functions in LabVIEW to open Inspection A, B, or C on the camera, run that inspection a single time and return the results and inspection image. That still ends up with one or more cameras hanging, especially if I've added the case to handle the more complicated registration mark.
I think I may be running out of memory in the camera. I have occasionally received an out of memory error message when running the inspection in debug (step) mode in the VB configuration interface, at which point the camera will disconnect from the VB interface. When I look at the system monitor tab for a camera in MAX, I can see that it is showing me 11.5M free/124M total memory, and 72.3Mfree/118M total disk space. If I understand those numbers, that means that less than 10% of the memory is free when the inspection starts!
I'm only communicating with the cameras via the ethernet interface. Are there any software components I don't need to have installed on the 1744 (MAX lists about 12 different things installed!) in that case?
Alternatively, it appears there are VBAI functions available that might let me acquire an image and then process it via a local copy of Vision Builder running on the host PC, rather than in the camera. Is that so, and if so, would it be faster than running the inspection in the camera?
I've attached a zipfile with the inspection that appears to stall the camera, and samples of typical images captured of the empty fork and a sample holder.
Kevin Roche
Advisory Engineer/Scientist
Spintronics and Magnetoelectronics group
IBM Research Almaden
Attachments:
Carrier Read Problem.zip ‏657 KB

The good news: thanks to some offline assistance from Brad, my cameras are no longer crashing.
The bad news: my labview VI using VBAI functions still fails for one or more cameras after a while (typically >12 hours of monitoring).
It's very odd: the cameras are still visible online.
I can ping them.
I can connect to them via VBAI, run inspections that way (either in configuration mode or inspection mode), and disconnect successfully.
My calling VI, however insists that it can't connect (usually with a -354700 error from VBAI Connect.vi, occasionally with a -354705).
I am using shift registers in the monitor loop of the main VI so that I can pass the VBAI session reference for each camera back to the subvis that actually load and run the desired inspection once a connection has been made. After an indeterminate time, one or more of those appears to go bad, but if I attempt to reset and connect to the camera again (I did include a control to let me close and reconnect if necessary from the monitor loop), I still get the above errors.
The only way to get them back online within LabVIEW this morning proved to be to stop the main VI and reset all the controls to default, reboot the cameras, and then restart the VI. At that point it was able to connect to all 6 again and has been running happily for over 8 hours.
I set up the persistent sessions using the shift registers because I have observed in the past continually opening and closing resources like that can lead to memory problems. It also dramatically reduced my cycle time when all I want to do is get the latest images from the cameras to under 2 seconds.
Any ideas? Is there some subtlety to disconnecting/reconnecting to the VB in the cameras via Labview that I'm missing?
I am working on a slightly smarter version of the inspection that can be allowed to run continously in a camera and simply return the appropriate result when asked, rather than having to start and stop different inspections as I do now, but that is not ready for deployment yet. It's the symptom of running just fine for X hours and then losing one or more cameras that is baffling me right now.
Kevin Roche
Advisory Engineer/Scientist
Spintronics and Magnetoelectronics group
IBM Research Almaden

Why does it take so long for the iPhone to recognize when space has been freed up for photos?

The short story:
I try to take a photo using the built in camera app. I get the dreaded 'no enough storage' message.
I then delete a bunch of photos, podcasts, etc. effectively freeing up plenty of space to take a photo.
Nope - iPhone Camera still things there is no space available.
After some unknown time delay - 10 minutes or more, in many cases, it will FINALLY let me take a photo.
The longer and more detailed story:
I know EVERYONE gets this message at one time or another and I know how to resolve it: "Cannot Take Photo - There is not enough available storage to take a photo. You can manage your storage in Settings."
Fine. I understand that. I'm out of space on my phone (not iCloud, as some users seem to confuse). It's a no brainer - you don't have enough space on your phone to take a new picture. Again - fine, I get that.
What I DON'T get, and what drives me absolutely NUTS, is that I will then go through my photos and delete a dozen or so that I don't really want, easily freeing up a good 20Mb or more, then when I try to take a photo again, I STILL GET THE out of space MESSAGE! Baloney. I am NO LONGER out of space. iPhone, you incredibly well designed and intelligent piece of hardware, why, for the love of all that is good, can't you figure out that I know have 20Mb free?
So, then I'll jump over to Podcasts, which I love, but take up lots of room on my phone. I'll delete a few of the large ones I've already listened to, easily freeing up a few HUNDRED MEGABYTES. We should be good to go, right? WRONG. The iPhone genius still tells me I don't even have enough space to eek out one lousy photo.
If I let my phone sit there long enough -- 10 minutes, 30 minutes, a few hours -- I haven't determined when the magic happens -- eventually the iPhone realizes that 'Hey, the user just deleted a bunch of junk and, wow, I'll be a son of a gun -- there IS enough space now to take a photo. iPhone -- happy!'
Thanks for nothing, iPhone. By this time, my daughter has stopped doing that amazing cute thing that I wanted to capture forever and quite possibly spawn the next generation of 'Charlie Bit Me' parodies. I freed up 500 Mb of prime photo snapping space 20 minutes ago. Thanks for finally realizing it. I realize you can only do like 170 quadrillion calculations a millisecond. I realize these things take time.
Can one of you iPhone engineers please, for goodness sake, please explain to me why this INFURIATING and seemingly unnecessary delay exists? I am no Windows fan boy but I can sure tell you that when I'm running low on hard drive space on my laptop and then delete 1GB of files, that 1GB INSTANTLY becomes available to me. I don't have to wait some interminable timeframe until it magically is usable.
One last thing that is puzzling -- so the native iPhone camera will refuse to let me take a photo because it things we're out of space (when we're not) but any third party photo app, like Camera+ or Camera Awesome, will happily snap pictures all day long. In fact, once I've taken them using one of these apps, I can then SAVE THEM TO THE CAMERA ROLL!
By the way -- when I started this well thought out rant, my iPhone said it was out of storage, and now, five minutes later -- you guessed it -- still out of storage, despite the fact that I deleted 10 photos and 4 podcasts.
So. Incredibly. Infuriating.
For you iOS 7 users, please let me know if this issue has been resolved at all with iOS 7. I've held off upgrading because iOS 7 messed up a bunch of things with the camera, at least on my wife's iPhone 5. Focus no longer works reliably -- touch to focus and touch to expose no longer work well -- the quality of photos took a big hit. I won't update until these issues have been resolved.

Thanks @pdroth. I did a quick Google search of DB indexing. I'm not sure I found exactly what you were referring to but I see where you're going with it. I can understand that indexing my database of stored photos can be time consuming. It's frustrating that the space can't be recognized as being free more quickly.
I notice that some items I delete seem to free up the space much more quickly. Removing an app entirely or deleting from my Music generally shows up as available space in Usage pretty quickly.
Deleting a photo or video from the Camera Roll will take MUCH longer, so I guess that has something to do with the indexing process you are referring to.
I'd like to point out that when I run out of space on an SD card on any budget point and click digital camera that I can quickly delete a picture or two and INSTANTLY be able to take a couple of new photos in their place. I guess I just have that same expectation for the $500+ engineering marvel I have in my hand right now.
Thanks for chiming in.

Mail takes considerably long time to download attachments

Hello,
Wondering if anybody has run into a solution for this problem:
Mail (Version 3.5, build 930.3) takes a VERY, VERY long time to download any attachments. I am using only ONE account - MobileMe.
Whenever I receive a message with an attachment (from Mac or PC) that is over 100K, Mail just crawls to a near stop when trying to download it. In fact, if the attachment is over 1MB, there is an excellent chance that the Mail program will hang altogether. I commonly will have to force quit the Mail application in order to get it working on the download again. THIS is the real problem. All other "text-only" messages come in at a normal speed and render almost instantly. In a message where there is a large attachment, the message and it's contents appear almost instantly, but the attachment(s) sits at the bottom, middle, or top of the message and remain "greyed out" while downloading. I get no indication that the attachment is downloading from the server in the mail activity pane either. It just sits there blank. Eventually the image will appear in the body of the message, but only if I click on another message in my inbox and then "click back" to the attachment message.
I just sent myself a message as a test. It was a 4.5MB Tiff file. It sent out from my account in about 45 seconds (ending in the "Swoosh" sound.) When Mail detected the new message a few seconds later, the download from MobileMe's servers took an astonishing 14 minutes to completely download and render in the body of my message. I can see no rhyme or reason as to why this is happening, but it has been present for over a year, even through OS updates, mail rebuilds, optimizations, and IMAP settings alterations.
The same download speed can be achieved on my wife's iPod Touch. Very fast.
The really strange thing is that my iPhone does NOT do this. I sent the same image again to my account and checked my mail with my iPhone instead. It took the same 45 seconds to send the image, but the iPhone was able to download and display the image in the iPhone mail App in just over a minute. This is using the exact same internet connection in my house, not Edge or 3G.
I have rebuilt my mailbox, deleted all accounts and settings, and have started from scratch several times. I am beginning to think that this is either an issue with the OS, or a major problem with my Mail application itself.
Any ideas on what may be causing this? I am using the standard MobileMe IMAP account settings that are provided when you set up a new Mail account.
Thanks for any help you can provide - this is driving me crazy. I have had to tell all of my friends to NOT send me any messages over 1MB or it will destroy my mail application for several minutes.
Message was edited by: nekosaur

ME TOO!!!! This has been driving me nuts!!! I've been trying to streamline my workflow and integrate everything the way it's SUPPOSED to work, to no avail! Does anyone know anything about this at all? Is apple looking into this? Does anyone have suggestions?
With me, it's any msg that has an image file, which is every email my school sends me! The msg doesn't display, Mail hangs and I have to force quit.
HELP!!!

Snow Leopard 10.6.2 takes a long time to run 'X11.app' (with system log)

Hello everyone, English is not my mother tongue so may not be exactly correct, sorry about that.
Background:
I have a MacBook White (13-inch, Mid 2009) that isn't unibody, and was running Leopard 10.5.
I did a clean installation and now Snow Leopard 10.6.2, with iLife, iWork, and many many apps.
I am the only one who will use the Mac and my user account is as the 'admin'.
I previously had a problem concerning X11 too:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2343732
*What I've done:*
(1) rename my HD to 'Michaels_Home' under 'Get Info' from Finder (I can't rename in Disk Utility though)
(2) press return (enter)
(3) change my home folder path to the '/Volumes/Michaels_Home/Users/Michael' (http://eshop.macsales.com/Reviews/Framework.cfm?page=Tips/relocate3/relocate3.ht ml)
(4) restart
(5) log in and open X11
(6) problem solved!!
==========
*BUT NOW* I have a problem after:
(1) log in as the root user, and use command +ditto -V xyz xyz+ to copy my home folder from '/Volumes/Michaels_Home/Users/Michael' to '/Users>Michael'
(2) change my home folder path to the '/Users/Michael' (http://eshop.macsales.com/Reviews/Framework.cfm?page=Tips/relocate3/relocate3.ht ml)
(3) use the Mac OS X Snow Leopard USD$29 disc to boot my Mac up
(4) delete the 'Michaels_Home' partition (I had 3 partitions: (1) Macintosh HD (2) Michaels_Home (3) Windows XP Professional)
(5) resize the 'Macintosh HD' partition
(6) boot from Macintosh HD
(7) find that there's a problem about X11
_The problem:_
it takes a *long time* for X11 to start.
When I try to open the 'X11.app', the X11 icon begins jumping on the Dock, but nothing happens.
Jumping and jumping... finally, it doesn't jump any more, with just the X11 icon on the dock.
What's more, there is no white dot under the icon, which means the app isn't running at the moment.
I right-clicked the icon, it shows me 'application not responding'.
So, I open the *Activity Monitor*, and I can see there are 3 apps related to X11 are running:
(1) X11
(2) X11.bin
(3) xauth
*At the moment now, if you would wait for about 1.5 min., X11 will open.*
Please see below for the system log (from 'FREEZING' to 'WORKING')
==========
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app: main(): argc=2
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[0] = /Applications/Utilities/X11.app/Contents/MacOS/X11.bin
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[1] = -psn0139298
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: Waiting for startup parameters via Mach IPC.
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: font_cache: Scanning user font directories to generate X11 font caches
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: font_cache: Updating FC cache
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 org.x.privileged_startx[344]: font_cache: Scanning system font directories to generate X11 font caches
Mar 1 00:42:10 n219073058253 defaults[370]: \nThe domain/default pair of (org.x.X11, dpi) does not exist
Mar 1 00:42:12 n219073058253 org.x.privileged_startx[344]: font_cache: Updating FC cache
Mar 1 00:42:13 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: font_cache: Done
Mar 1 00:42:14 n219073058253 org.x.privileged_startx[344]: font_cache: Done
Mar 1 00:42:31 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: xauth: timeout in locking authority file /Users/Michael/.serverauth.335
Mar 1 00:42:51 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: xauth: timeout in locking authority file /Users/Michael/.Xauthority
Mar 1 00:43:31: --- last message repeated 1 time ---
Mar 1 00:43:31 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: xauth: timeout in locking authority file /Users/Michael/.Xauthority
Mar 1 00:43:51: --- last message repeated 1 time ---
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app: Listening on socket for fd handoff: (4) /var/tmp/tmp.0.9OYerf
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app: Thread created for handoff. Returning success to tell caller to connect and push the fd.
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app: Received new $DISPLAY fd: 6 ... sleeping to allow xinitrc to catchup.
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app: dostart_x11server(): argc=6
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[0] = /usr/X11/bin/X
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[1] =
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[2] = -nolisten
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[3] = tcp
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[4] = -auth
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[5] = /Users/Michael/.serverauth.335
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: Xquartz: Handoff connection established (try 1 of 5) on fd 6, "/var/tmp/tmp.0.9OYerf". Sending message.
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: Xquartz: Message sent. Closing handoff fd.
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: Xquartz starting:
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X.Org X Server 1.4.2-apple45
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: Build Date: 20090705
Mar 1 00:43:51 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: (EE) XKB: Couldn't open rules file /usr/X11/share/X11/xkb/rules/base
Mar 1 00:43:54: --- last message repeated 1 time ---
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app Handing off fd to server thread via DarwinListenOnOpenFD(6)
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: DarwinListenOnOpenFD: 6
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: Calling ListenOnOpenFD() for new fd: 6
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: X11.app: Launching /usr/X11/bin/xterm:
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[0] = /bin/sh
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[1] = -c
Mar 1 00:43:54 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: argv[2] = /usr/X11/bin/xterm
==========
I quit the X11:
==========
Mar 1 00:45:45 n219073058253 [0x0-0x22022].org.x.X11[327]: Quitting Xquartz...
Mar 1 00:45:45 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: /usr/X11/bin/xinit: connection to X server lost.
Mar 1 00:45:45 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: waiting for X server to shut down
==========
AFTER quitting X11, I can see something related X11 is stilling running:
==========
Mar 1 00:46:06 n219073058253 org.x.startx[335]: xauth: timeout in locking authority file /Users/Michael/.Xauthority
==========
So what actually causes this problem?
Thanks in advance!

It turns out that there's something wrong about permissions.
Here's the fix:
(1) log in as the +root user+
(2) type +chown -R Michael:staff ~Michael+
(3) log out the +root user+
(4) log in your account
(5) done!
Hope this thread will help those who encounter the same problem as me!

When a process flow activity takes a long time to run.

Hello,
I have a process flow activity that sometimes takes a long time to run so that the process flow never ends. Is it possible that I can set the activity so that during a certain time that this has not been executed automatically flow process to continue?
I'm Using Oracle Warehouse Builder 11g on Windows Server 2003 R1.
Greetings and thanks.

What I've done in the past is just use a small polling procedure (PL/SQL) and a conditional transition in the process flow, depending on what the proc returns (Continue or Fail) then the flow of control in the Process is changed.
I think the key also is to not have too much paralellism going on too, that way it's easy to streamline the PF and remove slow moving processes to a more linear path (stopping bottle necks on your logical AND).
Edited by: NSNO on Apr 29, 2010 2:31 PM

What's wrong with this Forum? Why does Adobe take so long to reply to posts?!

What's wrong with this Forum? Why does Adobe take so long to reply to posts?!
This is actually "specific" to this Photoshop Forum.
I typically get responses back from other Adobe forum promptly.
Chime in.

The Adobe engineering folks DO duck in here from time to time - and that's a BLESSING! Please name any other big company where you get to interact with the engineers AT ALL. I can't. But I suspect the engineers actually have a lot oof real work to do, and their time here is necessarily limited.
Your comments are more along the line of "I pay a huge amount, for that I expect better support". These are very valid comments. But reality is different from what we may expect, and this forum is not the place to expect Adobe support participation AT ALL. In fact, the technical support people at Adobe often direct users to come here (something I've always found amusing).
At the higher level, Adobe may simply not be spending enough on support for literally millions of users. Is is greed or smart business to try to minimize support cost? That's up for individuals to decide.
I suggest you write a snail-mail letter to the Adobe president if you're not getting the support you need.
-Noel

Vision builder AI engine takes so long to launch .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for