Want Document date in Translation date when we are doing MIGO.

Hi Expert,
While doing MIGO, my client needs "Document date" in "Translation date " when we click "FI Document" button.
Even i tried badi "FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE". but this is working fine for maximum transaction but not working for MIGO.
Could any body help me on this....
Regards
Sanjay Kr.

Hi Amaresh,
Without mapping its difficult to achieve, you have to create custom adapter module or you could try below steps.
1. Configure your receiver file adapter to create files with same source file name
2. Write script to rename the file based on your requirement.
3. Call the script in Run OS command after message processing in receiver file adapter.
Regards,
Praveen

Similar Messages

Why does the Date Created metadata change when images are exported?How do I stop it from changing?

why does the Date Created metadata change when images are exported? How do I stop it from changing? I must have a prefernce set up wrong.

I don't know what OS you are using, or what application you are using to view the data about your exported files, but on Windows and using Windows Explorer the "Date Created" field relates only to the date that the exported file was created, i.e. if viewed immediately after export it will show the date created as being the same date. In order to view "Capture Date" in something like Explorer, you first have to ensure you have included the Metadata as Conrad outlined above, then you have to adjust the display properties of Explorer to show the "Date Taken" field. Here is an example, part of a folder I exported back on March 3rd, note the difference between that last two dates:

*When we are doing the cross company code transaction it is hitting

Hi Experts,
Her my client having one requirment as follows,
When we are doing the cross company code transaction it is hitting the wrong Gl (i.e 109999999-suspense clearing a/c)
It should hit either (135060016-tie up control a/c or 241060001-tilaknagar industries ltd control ac) What can i do?
Regards,
Devendra
Edited by: Devendraachari on Jun 30, 2010 12:07 PM
Moderator: Give proper titles to your threads

hI,
check what is the gl account maintained for cross company code transactions. T.code may be OBA1
What transactions you are doing ex: Asset transfer, vendor postings .. ..
Regards,
Sankar
Edited by: Durgasankar.Innamuri on Jun 30, 2010 12:09 PM

What does the Merge Data Stream processor do when there are multiple input streams to it from the same reader?

Hi,
I have a process with a reader of master data that outputs 5 records that feeds simultaneously into 3 different lookup and return processors.
Each lookup and return processor brings some data back from a detail table. There can be multiple details so I follow each lookup processor with a split records from array processor. Hence I end up with 3 'streams' of data. Stream 1 has 8 records, stream 2 has 5 records and stream 3 has 6 records.
I join all these streams to a Merge Data Streams processor.
I end up with 9 records so although the help for the Merge Data Streams processor says 'Merge Data Streams does not perform any transformation, matching, or merging of records' there is clearly some merging going on.
What is the behaviour of the merge data streams processor in this scenario?
I have added attributes and flags into each of the streams. How many records should I see and what values should the added attributes/flags have (some records show attributes/flags from all 3 streams whereas others show just those attributes/flags from one stream).
I have developed a test case simply to understand what the processor is doing but it's not obvious and furthermore it's probably unwise to develop EDQ processes where the processor behaviour is not documented and guaranteed to remain consistent. What I am trying to achieve is to bring all of a person's (the master data) various details (assignments, employers, etc.) together so we can check the data (some rules require data from multiple details).
Thanks, Nik

Cheers Mike - and for the explanation of the terms.
I think I understand now how it's supposed to work.
What I'm finding however is that when I set a flag to Y at the beginning of a path (that includes a lookup and return and then split records from array processor) that flag is showing no (i.e. an empty) value in SOME of the records shown in the subsequent MDS processor (it's fine the very last split processor before we get to the MDS but then again there are fewer records in that split processor than the MDS).
In my case there are obviously more records in the MDS processor than there were in the original reader (because the lookup and returns are configured to have unlimited maximum matches). As mentioned, the different paths return different numbers of records before being combined in the MDS. Say a reader has 5 records and path 1 returns 8 records in total including a path-specific flag (flag1, set to Y) but path 2 (that again adds its own path-specific flag (flag2, set to Y) returns just 5 records (since nothing was added from the lookups) are you saying that flag2 would show as 'Y' for all 8 records shown in the MDS?
Hopefully you would be able to see what I mean if you try to create a process like the one I've described (or I can upload a package).
Re. the purpose of the separate paths approach it is simply to allow the visualisation ('showing the working' as Neil puts it) of the different checks being carried out by the process.
This is considered one of the benefits of the tool over writing SQL queries (with outer joins, query criteria, etc.).
Also, as mentioned I was following an example that Neil put together for us to ensure that we are doing things in a 'proper' and supported way.
If we put all the lookups, etc. for all the checks into one datastream then it no longer becomes so understandable and the value of joining processors in a process over simply writing SQL becomes questionable; arguably the EDQ process in fact becomes less easy to understand than simply writing SQL.
Also, to go down this route I will need to revise the (what was previously substantially working until I revised it) processes that I have already developed.
Thanks, Nik

TS3579 Finder is displaying wrong information on date of modification and when files are opened up, this did not help me. I am using Mavericks.

Never tried this before but this, the topic, is a little bit annoying at times.. any idea how to fix this or is this just how it will be? This is not OS X ML tho as stated in topic.

I've just reported that to Apple at https://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
It's fair to call it a bug I think. Opening a folder changes the modification dates of some, but not all, the folders enclosed.
Plays havoc with organising time series (backups, things one has just worked on, etc.).

How to suppress 'Do u want to save the changes?' When there are no changes

Hi All,
I have developed one form,which contains 3 blocks in that 2 are database blocks and one is control block.It's working fine.When I close the form without doing any change also it is showing an alert as 'Do you want to save the changes you have made?'. How can I suppress that alert when I haven't made any change to the form.
I am displaying one filed in the database block as 'null' until check box is checked.For that I have written code in when-new-block-instance trigger of that block.
There I wrote SET_RECORD_PROPERTY (GET_BLOCK_PROPERTY (:SYSTEM.TRIGGER_BLOCK, CURRENT_RECORD), :SYSTEM.TRIGGER_BLOCK, STATUS, QUERY_STATUS); also to change the block status as query.
But it is not working, still I am getting the alert,How can I solve this could anyone please give me a suggestion..
Thanks in advance.

So, this functionality can be done through CHECK BOX itself. Why you are making null by WHEN-NEW-BLOCK-INSTANCE. You can just set the update and insert property for that fields and rest things you can control from chexbox. And WHEN-BLOCK-INSTANCE-TRIGGER will fire once when you will access that block. If you want to set the same functionality for each record. Then you must use WHEN-NEW-RECORD-INSTANCE. for ex.
Trigger = WHEN-NEW-RECORD-INSTANCE (BLOCK-LEVEL)
Here i will assume that if check box is checked then he can update that fields.
IF :CHECKBOX='Y' THEN
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',INSERT_ALLOWED,PROPERTY_TRUE);
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',UPDATEABLE,PROPERTY_TRUE);
ELSE
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',INSERT_ALLOWED,PROPERTY_FALSE);
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',UPDATEABLE,PROPERTY_FALSE);
END IF;In the above code no need for set value to NULL.
And on CHECK BOX you can write like this...
Trigger WHEN-CHECKBOX-CHANGED (ITEM-LEVEL)
IF :CHECKBOX='Y' THEN
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',INSERT_ALLOWED,PROPERTY_TRUE);
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',UPDATEABLE,PROPERTY_TRUE);
ELSE
:FIELD_NAME:=NULL; -- here if check box is unchecked then it will set value to NULL
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',INSERT_ALLOWED,PROPERTY_FALSE);
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME',UPDATEABLE,PROPERTY_FALSE);
END IF;-Ammad

A" to view warnings click or open a document "box cant be moved when pages are open

This box has suddenly appeared and I cannot move it will get rid of it when I open Pages,
It just comes with a warning;- to view mornings click or open a document?
Any ideas thank you

The same started happening with me today. It happens on opening Pages, so not a dialog box anywhere else as nothing is opening. I can go on to open a blank document, but the diaglog box is still on the top of the document, new message is "There are no warnings for this document", but I still can't get rid of the box

Document body text in email, when you are sending the PO by email

Hi
I folowed the note 191470 and sending PO by the mail works fine.
I just doesn't have nothing in the body text in the e-mail... I created the text at the output type, but I don't get nothing,
Any tip?
Thanks in advance
BR
Saso

Hi SF,
Your settings look correct,The Notify step should work fine.
Still you can refer the below link ,which will guide you in detail on how to use the Notify step in MDM Workflows.
I have used the Notification step in MDM workflows in the SP06 version and it works fine.I am not quite sure whether this will will work in the SP05 version.
Even after all the correct settings if it does not work as expected ,then i guess it should be a version problem.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90efe90c-b03f-2b10-65bf-e572fef651cb (email notification in wf)
The main reasons why the notify step may not work are:
Check for the following:
- The mds Settings are correct and mention the IP of the server instead of the Name.
- All the users to whom notification have to be send must have to complete email ,mention in console.
- Try Restarting the MDM server once after configuring the MDS.ini file
Hope It Helped
Thanks & Regards
Simona Pinto

Unusual Error,when doing MIGO

Hello Experts..
When we are doing MIGO,we are getting the following error.
" MARC-VMTRA EXCEEDED by 7.3 TO.".
Tried a lot.... but not understanding.
Pls GUIDE....
VERY VERY URGENT.....!
Rgds
sumanth.G

Dear Sumanth,
Your problem might be Plant Data for Material Stock in transit for prev. period is reached its level.
check your stock level as well material master settings mean MRP or Forecast settings
Hope problem will solve
Prem

Translation date from billing document

Hello,
We are setting up currencies in our system and i am facing a problem with conversion date used for posting documents.
The client would like to use the pricing date (set in VBRP-PRSDT) as conversion date.
I have checked taht conversion date type was set to 3 in OB22.
I have created a substituion rule for document header, trying just to check by using a constant.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work, I always get the document date as translation date (which is the default).
There should be a solution to set this translation date automatically for SD-> FI interface as you can enter it when posting manually by FB70.
I have found several posts on the forum for this topic but all solutions I have read did not fix the issue.
Any ideas ?

Hi
When you creating a order you can set a currency at Sales A. (double click on material).
It maybe solve your problem.
Best
Lukasz

Local Currency - Translation Date Type

Hi:
We are on ECC 6.0 with New GL.
I wanted to check if we can change the Translation Date Type for 1st local currency (10) from Translation date to document date? There are three options in this field - Posting date, document date and translation date. But when we maintain it (under additional local currencies for a company code), local currency has this grey out and comes default to translation date. Not sure where it is defined that local currency can be translated only based on translation date.
However for 2nd and 3rd currencies this field is open and allow to choose any date type.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Rahul

Hello Rahul,
For the local currency, it is hard-coded in the system to
choose the translation date as the transalation date (type 3). If you
change this translation date when you enter a document, the system will
use this new date. However, if you don't change this, the system will
always use the posting date as translation date for the local currency.
hope thic clarifies
Ray

Currency Translation date change.

Hi,
we use multiple currencies .For a sales organisation EUR currency, 2nd local currency isHUF, 3rd local is CZK. Translation happens on translation date. Invoices can be made in VF01.
These invoices use one important date, called billing date. This date is the key for few things, e.g. postings to FI happens on that, or baseline date calculation. Billing date is normally determine document date, document date determine translation date.
All these will bring that translation from document currency to 2nd local will happen on billing date. Is it somehow possible to change the logic? Can It somehow be defined which date should be used for translation? Can different date be used for translation than billing date?
Regards

Hi
When you creating a order you can set a currency at Sales A. (double click on material).
It maybe solve your problem.
Best
Lukasz

Help with MIRO Badi's and Translation Date (Exchange Rate Date Reference)

Dear experts
This is a problem I have read a lot about, but none of the answers work properly and I wanted to create a new thread in order to try to compile a final answer for this problem (at least in version 6.0)
As you know Standar SAP uses posting date as translation date in MIRO for foreign currency.
This is not always true (imagine Crude Imports with 3 dates: Invoice date, posting date and Bill of Lading date. The last one happens to be the fiscal date for exchange rate in my county and the other two are also mandatory).
I am proposing thus to use 3 dates: Document date as invoice date; posting date as posting date and Invoice Receipt Date
(REINDAT - RBKP) as Bill of Lading date. I would like to implement this third date as translation date.
Lot of ways to do it, but none works properly as for the end user it is complicated to enter data in a certain way so that BADI's work properly. I have implemented note 574583 and only works with some restrictions.
I have also used some more BADI's like MRM_HEADER_CHECK, FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE, INVOICE_UPDATE,... and all of them have some restrictions (depending always in data header taps data introduction or saving the exchange rate properly in MM TABLES but not in FI TABLES).
I would really appreciate if anyone could help with this, ensuring that the Badi get's always the data and makes it work with no screen selection dependance.
Thanks in advance.

Dear All,
I have found the solution with the help of ABAPer. The system has a bug for which SAP has given a Sap Note no 22781.
Actually what happened in the Invoice is, the system by default fetched the exchange rate for the Exchange Rate Type 'M' for the rate last maintained. Since we were using different Exchange rate it did not match. Also we came to know about the difference only because off-late the users had stopped updating Exchange Rate 'M' .
The funny part is in the Invoice if we click on each tab at the header and come back to the first tab where we find the Exchange rate for accounting, the system picks up the actually rate as per the Exchange Rate maintained.
Regards,
Karthik.

Translation date in MIRO

Dear experts
This is a problem I have read a lot about, but none of the answers work properly and I wanted to create a new thread in order to try to compile a final answer for this problem (at least in version 6.0)
As you know Standar SAP uses posting date as translation date in MIRO for foreign currency.
This is not always true (imagine Crude Imports with 3 dates: Invoice date, posting date and Bill of Lading date. The last one happens to be the fiscal date for exchange rate in my county and the other two are also mandatory).
I am proposing thus to use 3 dates: Document date as invoice date; posting date as posting date and Invoice Receipt Date
(REINDAT - RBKP) as Bill of Lading date. I would like to implement this third date as translation date.
Lot of ways to do it, but none works properly as for the end user it is complicated to enter data in a certain way so that BADI's work properly. I have implemented note 574583 and only works with some restrictions.
I have also used some more BADI's like MRM_HEADER_CHECK, FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE, INVOICE_UPDATE,... and all of them have some restrictions (depending always in data header taps data introduction).
I would really appreciate if anyone could help with this, ensuring that the Badi get's always the data and makes it work with no screen selection dependance.
Thanks in advance.

hI,
Hope the below link will be extreamly useful for you for the transalations .Better stick on to the sap logic .If your requirement is really needed try crreate a user exit based upon your logic to get the exchange rates as per your requiremsnts.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/a8/b997be452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards

Exchange rate not updated with posting date, translation date updated

Hi,
I have the follwoing problem in F110. Currency documents are posted with exchange date of the docuemnt entry date. Translation date is updated with Posting date, just exchange rate is not updated. the systems calculates according entry date. Why entry date is one day before the date of posting, I cannot understand. The system takes the exchage date from entry date, which is one day before (docuemnt, posting and translation date)
Thank you,
Desimira

Hello,
This means, that the exhange rate is missing your local currency vs USD in the system. Your Business Partner or any of items you are adding to the invoice is using USD (price list or customer is in USD).
My tip is some of the items has USD price set or USD Purchase price used.
DO the following:
Check the POsting date of your invoice
Go to Administration -> Exhnage rate, and locate the posting date and USD from the matrix, and enter the rate.
Post your invoice.
it will work
Regards
János.

Want Document date in Translation date when we are doing MIGO.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for