Warning during check table

hi everyone,
i create a new table and then check it, a warning like below will appear,"TABLES IS NOT YET CLASSIFIED". What will cause that? Any suggestion is appreciated.
Regards,
Julian

Hi,
"TABLES IS NOT YET CLASSIFIED".
this is because you have not classified your table
from menu EXTRAS->ENHANCMENT CATEGORY
now choose the one of the radio button ans press ok.
read the documentation of ENHANCEMENT CATEGORY also.
DE DE_RADIO_EXCLASS
Short Text
Enhancement Category Selection
Definition
Structures and tables that were defined by SAP in the ABAP Dictionary can be enhanced subsequently by customers using Customizing includes or append structures. The enhancements do not only refer to structures/ tables themselves, but also to dependent structures that adopt the enhancement as an include or referenced structure. Append structures that only take effect at the end of the original structure can also cause shifts - in the case of dependent structures - even within these structures.
You must select an enhancement category for the following reason: In programs where there is no active Unicode check, enhancements to tables and structures can cause syntax and runtime errors during type checks and particularly in combination with deep structures.
In programs where there is an active Unicode check, statements, operand checks, and accesses with an offset and length are problematic - for example, if numeric or deep components are inserted into a purely character-type structure and the structure thus loses its character- type nature.
Depending on the structure definition, the radio buttons allowed in the dialog box are ready for input. Choose one of the possible enhancement categories:
Cannot be enhanced
The structure must not be enhanced.
Can be enhanced or character type
All structure components and their enhancements must be character-type (C, N, D, or T). The original structure and all enhancements through Customizing includes or through append structures are subject to this limitation.
Can be enhanced or character-type or numeric
The structure and its enhancement must not contain any deep data types (tables, references, strings).
Can be enhanced in any way
The structure and its enhancement may contain components whose data type can be of any type.
Not classified
This category can be chosen, for example, for a transition status; however, it must not be chosen for creating structures.
The rules for defining the enhancement category result implicitly from the structure setup and the classification of the types used. These rules are as follows:
If the object contains at least one numeric type or a substructure or component (field has a structure/table/view as its type) that can be enhanced numerically, the object can no longer be enhanced character-type, but is itself, at most, enhanceable character-type or numeric.
If the object contains a deep component (string, reference, or table type), or it contains a substructure or component that is marked as enhanceable in any way, then the object itself is enhanceable in any way.
If the object does not contain any substructure or component that is marked as enhanceable, you can select cannot be enhanced. If the structure has not yet been enhanced, you can choose the categorycannot be enhanced in any case.
If you are creating new tables and structures in the ABAP Dictionary, the system proposes the category can be enhanced in any way as standard value for the classification of the enhancement options. If the developer chooses a more restrictive classification than can be enhanced in any way for a particular structure, then only the classification levels that adhere to the rules above are allowed. It is not possible to choose an enhancement option of a structure that is more restrictive than the classification resulting immplicitly from the structure setup and from the classification of the types used. Therefore, only the allowed categories are proposed for selection in the maintenance user interface.
If a structure depends on one or several other structures, the smallest category is chosen as implicit classification (in the order cannot be enhanced < can be enhanced and character-type < can be enhanced and character-type or numeric < can be enhanced in any way). This classification is greater than or less than the category in the other structures and also greater than or the same as the category that results from the actual setup in the original structure itself.
Regards
vijay

Similar Messages

Change error message to warning during pricing condition upper limit check.

Hi All,
I have a header condition ZFMN to which maximum amount that can be entered is set to $5000. When I enter the amount greater than this, it gives me error message.
Could we change it to warning message?

During Creation of PO when you click PO Check, What Include you are using.
Cann't you use the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and write the code whatever you want in PO_CHECK,
There during Check you use any FM POP_TO_CONFIRM OR POP_TO_INFORM or show any information Message too.
Try it once.
Thanks
Arbind

Error during Goods Receipt:Check table XMCHB: Entry 'Material no.', 'Plant

Dear All,
I am trying to post Goods Receipt for a Stock Transport Order.
The error message appears as " Check table XMCHB: entry 'material no.' 'plant', '____' , 'batch no.' does not exist. (message no. M7001)
The Supplying plant stock from which Goods Issue is done, is a Normal storage location Unrestricted stock.
The receipt has to be taken into Vendor stock (Goods Receipt movement type 101 O )
Inputs will be appreciated.

technically spoken.
table MCHB is the storage location segment of a batch record.
System tries to create an entry in MCHB without a storage location, which does not make sense.
Vendor stock does not go to MCHB, instead it is recorded in table MKOL.
If you do STOs then you may transfer vendor consignment stock, but you cannote issue own stock and receive into vendor consignment stock.

QM UD Error Message: Check table XEKBN: entry 45039875220001003 does not exist.

Hello QM expert,
I encounter a error when I make a UD. (Please refer to below screenshot. )
Case 1: I did quantity post to unrestricted use, to scrap, to blocked stock, to new material, to reserves, return delivery. When I save this UD, there is a error message 'Check table XEKBN: entry 4503987522000100310100 does not exist.' (PS. 4503987522 is PO number, but I don't know what it is about 10031010.)
Case 2: I fill the same field like Case 1, but exclude to new material. It can be passed, no error message.
Case 3: I only fill one field [to new material. It can be passed, no error message.
Could you please give me some guidance? Thank you so much.
Best Regards,
Fanchao Bu

Hi Fanchao,
Form the inspection lot number range, I believe you are using GR form Purchase Order, right? Please confirm the below points -
1. Is this a normal PO or Sub-contractor's PO? Please confirm if this issue is happening for every stock posting like Unrestricted, Scrap, Blocked...? or just for one? Can you try one by one for example, move stock form QI => Unrestricted stock only (and do not combine all types together like the attached screenshot) and suggest if that is working.
2. If this is a non-valuated material you have used (NLAG) for testing? Are you trying to post materials for previous period? Storage Location SM10 is valid?
If still this issue exist, then potentially, there is some issue with valuation variant linked to valuation area, which is normally maintained in Configuration OPK9. Paralelly, you can request your ABAP team to check FM MB_UPDATE_VALUE_ENQUEUE_TABLE, Include LMBGBU04, as suggested by the below link -
SAP ABAP Function Module MB_UPDATE_VALUE_ENQUEUE_TABLE - SAP Datasheet - The Best Run SAP Run SAPDatasheet
You can also check SAP notes below, based on the business needs:
1. 403671 - Error M7001: 'Please check table &...'
    401462 - Error M7001: 'Please check table &...'
    201833 - M7001: 'Please check table XEKPO: Entry & &...'
    2072019 - Error M7001 raised during posting goods receipt
    407265 - Transfer parameter with BAPI BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL (this may be linked to your return Delivery of 1 PC...)
    439945 - GR w/ freight costs for stock transport ordr w/ML currencies
    521090 - FAQ: Stock transfer to stock transport order
    867878 - Inconsistencies in the EKBE table because of conversions
    214814 - M7001/M7361: Table T156M, entry MAA7 2
    1584493 - Overdelivery check for GR blocked stock with GR-based IV
    102863 - GI f.delivery f.a stock transfer w.delivery costs
2. 409529 - Price differences during goods receipt for purchase order
3. 1528009 - MAA: incorrect distribution of goods receipt quantities
4. 1569831 - MAA2: Composite SAP Note after Support Package SAPKH60504
5. 406973 - M7001: Please check table XEBEFU: Entry does not exist
6. 70577 - QA11: Error M7001 when posting qty in usage decision (OLD NOTE, May not be applicable)
7. 824322 - QAC1: Incorrect batch in material document (Old Note, may no be applicable)
Else, you can speak to MM team and/or FI team to help you better in this case, as I feel there is no much QM issues involved.
Thanks,
Arijit

MS05 transaction throws "SQL error: error during INSERT (table: &)"

Hi Team,
I am a BASIS engineer on MM system. we have a strange problem from customers we see an error on the MS05 screen with "SQL error: error during INSERT (table: &)" and when the support team runs MS01 transaciton this error gets resolved.
What I would like to know is what could be the likely cause of this error and how we can prevent it.
When I check the SM21 logs i noticed one log with "Transaction cancellation 61 204 ( PLAF )"
and under additional document section is the log I see the below information
Usually, the reason for this error is that an entry already exists
with the same key.
This problem can occur if the client was copied with the movement data
without adjusting the number range intervals.
Please check if the number ranges for this table have been set
correctly and, if necessary, correct the number range interval.
I am from BASIS and I have no clue in how the MM transactions are linked can any MM gurus help in identifying the root cause for this problem.
any help on this is highly appreciated
thanks
Vijay

Hi
Are MS05 & MS01 you're referring is a T-code?. if so, then they are associated with planning and a PP consultant can give a more clear picture on it. Try posting this to a PP forum.
Based on the error log, i guess this may arise because of the number range problem, when the document is getting saved and record is being tried to inserted into a table.
Thanks
E.Avudaiappan

ME 808: System error: error during update Table EKAB

Hi,
Couple of years ago, during carve out, one of the contracts was deleted.
A PO created against that contract carries some open quantities. Now our purchasing wants to close this PO, either by changing the quantity to delivered quantity (delivered quantity is lesser than PO quantity), or by checking the delivery complete box. But they are not able to do so, as there was no contract number exists in the system table.
I propose to create a contract with the same number mentioned in the PO and then to change the quantity in the purchase req and PO. However now the system issues a dump error message "ME 808: System error: error during update Table EKAB".
Can anyone help how to resolve the issue?
Any body had similar situation?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Shiva

Hi,
I am not sure how the external consultants deleted this contract during carve out.
Our division was bought out from another company and moved the data to our SAP system.
I checked the OSS and found note 922427 could resolve the issue.
Thanks for your response.
Regards

Drop down ! check table validating ?

Hi,
For ALV edit mode i am creating a fieldcatalog-checktable field fill with value ! , then also while in the drop values are get validated with check table?
It is validating the entry with checktable? why ? after giving ls_fcat-checktable = '!'.
* Here YDROP_DOWN field have check tabke values " ", 1, 2
ls_fcat-fieldname = 'YDROP_DOWN'.
ls_fcat-datatype = 'INT4'.
ls_fcat-checktable = '!'.
ls_fcat-no_out    = c_x.
append ls_fcat to pt_fieldcat.
describe table pt_fieldcat lines v_rows.
call method cl_alv_table_create=>create_dynamic_table
    exporting
      it_fieldcatalog = pt_fieldcat
    importing
      ep_table        = g_hts.
assign g_hts->* to <i_status>.
Then during the first display
call method g_grid->set_table_for_first_display
    exporting
      is_layout            = gs_layout
      i_save               = 'A'
      it_toolbar_excluding = i_exclude[]
    changing
      it_fieldcatalog      = gt_fieldcat[]
      it_outtab            = <i_status>[].
call method g_grid->set_ready_for_input
    exporting
      i_ready_for_input = v_input. " it will be 1 or 0
a®

Hi ARS,
See the below link and i am sure it will help you lot
/people/srilatha.t/blog/2007/04/16/alv-grid-150-insert-row-function
/people/david.halitsky/blog/2007/04/24/so-youve-got-to-code-an-editable-alv-inside-an-sap-provided-exit-and-x-function-group
Problem in ALV
Thanks
Seshu
Message was edited by:
        Seshu Maramreddy

Domain vs. Check Table

I am a functional person but came across the topic of domains vs. check tables when discussing the addition of additional customer fields into ECC. What is the difference between these two and when should either be used?

Domain Values, refer to all the possible values that the particular domain can take. These values will be taken up from a table, that will be specified in the 'value table' field during the domain definition.
Check Table, refers to the foriegn key table that is associated with the corresponding table field.
Foriegn Key table, is the table with which any value being entered for the corresponding field, is checked. If this value is found in this table only then is it added/changed in the database table.
They are primarily used to restrict values on a field.
Example. If there is a Domain zemp_numb, which is used to store the employee numbers.
The Value table for this table - znumbers, has values defined from 1 to 9999.
If this domain is used in a table field, then the first filter is set the domain value, by restricting on the values present in znumbers ie 1 - 9999.
Additonally, if a foriegn key relationship is specified, then the values are futher restricted, to those present in the this table.
if the check table is say zemp_num having number only from 1 to 100. Then the field for which this is a check table can take values only from 1 to 100 and not from 1 too 9999.

Values from check table to Dropdown

Hi Experts,
                I have a requirement like, i want to show the values from a check table in dropdown list. i have two transparent table of which i made a foreign key relation with the second one with some value restrictions. That all working fine.
    I tried creating an input box with reference to the field in the first table.then the search help is comming correctly with the valus from check table. But when i tried to attach the same to dropdown its not displaying the value.
please suggest a solution to display the values in drop down.
Regards
Sarath
Message was edited by:
        sarath satheesan

hi sarath.........
          consider you want to have some 10 purchase order numbers in your drop down.
          you will be assigning a node to your drop down.
          in its supply function, write the codings to fill your node by using a select query.
           just like filling a table.
           in this case, your drop down gets filled automatically.
--regards,
alex b justin

Check table TFBEFU_CR: entry 10 does not exist

Dear all
When i am doing GR for Order (T.Code : MB31),the system displays the following message.
Check table TFBEFU_CR: entry 10 does not exist
plz give me the solution as early as possible,bcaz it is very urgent to me.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Basava sreenu

Dear Mr.Basava,
I'm not sure,but try with this.
For the particular material which you are using in MB31 for Good's receipt for
Order,check whether the storage location is present in T code MMSC-Extend
material storage location.If not add and save,then try in MB31.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal

How can we restrict the f4 help from check table in the pop up form.

Hi,
I am trying to control the F4 help values from check table coming in the form of pop up.

When a user uses SM30 to add an entry into table, you often need to add more checks. If you were to add code inside, there is a big chance that it would be overwritten.
The solution: go to table maintenance generator ( se56) => Enviroment => add event.
[To add event in table main.|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8129f164-0a01-0010-2a8e-8765287250fc]

Maintenance View & Viewcluster & Check Table

Hi all,
I created a Viewcluster which includes three Maintenance Views. As you know after running the Viewcluster and when you enter a value to a field, the program checks the value according to the check table.
In my example for REVUS field check table is USR02. So whenever I enter a value to REVUS, it checks USR02 table, and it gives an error if I enter incorrect value. The question is if enter just space (blank), it accepts is - it doesn't give error. What is the situation here? How can I prevent to enter blank value to REVUS.
Thanks in advance.

Narendran,
Yes, this solves the problem. When I did like that it gives this error : Message no. 00 055 (Make an entry in all required fields).
I found another solution too. I'd like to share with you.
In the Maintenance View, we can define a Selection Condition for REVUS field. It should be like that Operator: NE Comparative Value: <blank>. So when we do this the Clusterview doesn't allow to enter blank value and gives this error: Message no. SV 033 (Specify the key within the work area)
It seems that second solution is better because if I choose the first solution when I need to change or modify the maintenance dialog I think I will need to change the screen again.
Thanks,

Inserting records into Table with check table logic in place

I want to insert records into a table, and have the check table to not allow invalid entries. Is there a function out there that will allow this? I am currently using the insert statement and it is working except that it is not giving an error when the value does not exist in the check table for the particular fields.
INSERT INTO ZSD_XREF VALUES WA_XREF.
That is the basic statement I'm using ZSD_XREF has several fields one being the material number field tied to the check table which happens to be MAKT file. The insert statement is not validating the material numbers using the check table, or at least it is not giving an error. Any ideas?

Paul,
Unfortunately, open SQL statements such as INSERT, UPDATE do not go through the check table logic as they directly hit the database layer. Check table checks are performed only if you go through application layer that is when you enter the same data through a screen.
You have to do the checks yourself.
Happy checking!!!
Srinivas

Files moving to NFS error folder - Could not insert message into duplicate check table

Hi Friends
Have anyone faced this error, could suggest me why.
The CSV Files failed on Sender Channel and moves to NFS error path and in the log it says as below.
Error: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Could not insert message into duplicate check table. Reason: com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlTransactionRollbackException: DB2 SQL Error

Hi Uma - is that a duplicate file? have you enabled duplicate file check in sender channel?
please check if the below note is applicable
1979353 - Recurring TxRollbackException with MODE_STORE_ON_ERROR stage configuration

Error While Doing GR "Check table YMSEG:"

I am getting following error while doing GR for sales set article 303387.
Check table YMSEG: entry 303384 0001 does not exist
Sales set header 303387
sales set Component 303384 & 303386.
can't find any issue with the article (material) setup

YMSEG is a standard internal table used in import and export of function modules.
if you search SAP notes on YMSEG then you get about 230 hits.
Unfortunately the info given is by far not enough to tell you the reason for this error.
The number from the error explains just that it is one of the sales set Components
But you need to describe the process and what changes you eventually did compared to standard process. Only then we might be able to help you further.

Warning during check table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for