WAS and multiple virtual Host

I am currently evaluating Oracle WAS on Linux.
It works fine except if I try to have Spyglass serve more than
one virtual host. When I do this it stops with an Internal error
after serving a few files.
Q. Does anyone have Spyglass serving for more than one virtual
host on the same port.
Q. What could be the problem
I use RH 5.1
Johnny Verhoeven
null

Web is stupidly easy - Apache has extensive support for multiple virtual hosts in a single server and will happily support as many domains/hostnames as you can throw at it.
Mail is a little trickier since it needs to hook into some kind of directory server to validate user addresses.
Mac OS X's Open Directory does support this, but it's a little cumbersome (basically every user has to exist in the main Open Directory domain as well as having a secondary email address(es) in the other domain(s).
This can get especially tricky when you have users with the same shortname in different domains - for example if you give [email protected] a secondary email address of [email protected] and you then get a new user [email protected], you can't give the third 'joe' the address 'joe' in Open Directory since that's already taken. This means he'll have to login using different credentials from his email address. Confused yet? You bet.
If you're prepared to eschew Open Directory you can just use Postfix's built-in support for virtual hosting, but it's a little more complex to setup and support and is entirely command-line based (i.e. there's no GUI for setting it up or supporting it).
So, for that reason you might be prepared to setup multiple virtual machines for each domain. It really depends on how much the domains are related (if at all).

Similar Messages

Oracle Portal Virtual Host Enhacement for Multiple Virtual Hosts

I open the TAR Number: 4326752.996
The TAR is related to " REQUEST ASSISTANCE FOR MULTIPLE VIRTUAL HOSTS AND MULTIPLE PAGE GROUPS CONFIG. "
This is the Scenario: We Have Oracle Portal installed in a single Box. yes I know I know... but Not everybody is Yahoo or Google for Clusters and all the good stuff, we just want our website managed by Oracle Portal since all our ERP is running Oracle Database. Anyway. 1 Box running Oracle Portal Infrastructure and MidTier.
It turns out that our previous configuration we have the LAMP Solution with PHP, Apache with Virtual Servers configuration very trivial for a regular web server however we have about 6 Virtual domains.
For example:
www.abc.com
www.def.com
www.ghi.com
www.jkl.com
www.mno.com
www.pqr.com
We also like to post all our Intranet Information in this great Portal:
http://intranet.com
Where intranet.com is the same server but setup in our Internal DNS without be a Real Internet Register Domain.
So bottom line we start doing great with Install our single box install, later [GRRRRRR does not come by default in port 80 GRRRRRR, ok need to move and setup the virtual host to resolve our main External website www.abc.com ]
For starters ok it worked we have our main website running Oracle Portal.
Now is time to go to the step number 2.
Setup another Page Group in Portal to be the Page_Group_INTERNAL.
I figure if Apache can setup Virtual Hosts pointing to Independent parts of the File System without be shared. I was expecting some kind of custom configuration where I can setup httpd.conf to point to some specific PageGroups to make sure
www.abc.com => Page_Group_External
never share information with:
intranet.com => Page_Gorup_Internal
My TAR was very quick closed with the Argument that is not what It supposed to do.
Since a virtual host is a common thing to do on Linux and Apache, I wonder if You guys could list this as one of the default features to have multiple virtual domains assosiated with Page Groups that they never talk or share Resources I think that would be really great.
In the mean time I guess we have no option but to put a password for every internal page or take the risk of share our Information to the Internet. Perhaps designate another box with Oracle Portal but In that case Is not really cost/bennefit to use a killer technology for our external site since we just have no more than 30 pages.
Anyway just figure drop you guys a note any advise will be really appreciated.
Best Regards Dino.

Hi Martin,
1. To change the target URL of KM resources you can to the following:
Access the URL Generation Service Configuration by navigating to:
System Administration -> System Configuration -> Knowledge Management -> Configuration
Content Management -> Global Services -> URL Generator Service
Change the Host property to "portal.company.com".
2. You change the Port by opening the Visual Administrator and going to : Dispatcher -> Services -> HTTP Provider
Change there the "Ports" entry from (Port:50000,Type:http)to (Port:80,Type:http). Then go on "Save".
3. To remove the "/irj" from the portal URL you can create a index.jsp with the following content, and save it in the J2EE Documentation folder:
<Drive>:\usr\sap\<SAPSID>\JC<J2EE_instance_number>\j2ee\cluster\server0\apps\sap.com\com.sap.engine.docs.examples\servlet_jsp\_default\root
<%
//Send the redirect using server redirection (not client script)
//This will also send the HTTP GET parameters
String queryString = request.getQueryString() ;
if (queryString==null ) {
response.sendRedirect
("irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.portal.navigation.portallauncher.default") ;
} else {//redirect with HTTP GET parameters
response.sendRedirect
("irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.portal.navigation.portallauncher.default?" + queryString) ;
%>
Hope this helps,
Robert

Multiple virtual host impacting performance

Is there a performance issue with relation to the number of virtual hosts
which one server is hosting? If there is, how many can an average server
handle before one would see a performance hit?
Thank you.

Web is stupidly easy - Apache has extensive support for multiple virtual hosts in a single server and will happily support as many domains/hostnames as you can throw at it.
Mail is a little trickier since it needs to hook into some kind of directory server to validate user addresses.
Mac OS X's Open Directory does support this, but it's a little cumbersome (basically every user has to exist in the main Open Directory domain as well as having a secondary email address(es) in the other domain(s).
This can get especially tricky when you have users with the same shortname in different domains - for example if you give [email protected] a secondary email address of [email protected] and you then get a new user [email protected], you can't give the third 'joe' the address 'joe' in Open Directory since that's already taken. This means he'll have to login using different credentials from his email address. Confused yet? You bet.
If you're prepared to eschew Open Directory you can just use Postfix's built-in support for virtual hosting, but it's a little more complex to setup and support and is entirely command-line based (i.e. there's no GUI for setting it up or supporting it).
So, for that reason you might be prepared to setup multiple virtual machines for each domain. It really depends on how much the domains are related (if at all).

How to configure multiple virtual hosts for the same context root /

Hi,
I am using Glassfish V1 U1 - b14 on Solaris.
I am trying to configure two applications to be mapped to the / root context, each one in its own virtual host.
Two things I have noticed:
1. I have to manually add virtual-hosts="hostId" in domain.xml/application-ref ... looks like just simply deploying the app does not do that although the application is set as default for its particular virtual host. Is this a bug?
2. Although I have set for each virtual host the default web-app correctly, and they both respond fine, I cannot map both of them to the / context. The second application (chronologically deployed) does not respond when called with the / context ....
Any ideas? Is this a bug again?
Regards,
Rares
Message was edited by:
raresp

Wow, that's a shame. All mighty Application Server and two different apps on two different virtual hosts are considered ambiguous to have the same context root definition.... Fair play to Tomcat and 90% of the rest of servlet containers!
In my case I have the same EAR we are planning to deploy to many (up to 30) virtual hosts. Faking different context roots for each deployment will bring unnecessary overheads...
Should I file a bug or feature request?
Thanks again for your answer, although you're basically saying it is not possible I will wait and look a while for a possible solution before bringing this topic to a conclusion.

Corrupted wiki list with multiple virtual host

Hello,
I have several virtual hosts and I want each of them to only list of wikis which are associated with them using the Wiki Admin Settings -> Advanced : Specific Host Names.
This does not seem to work. As soon as a wiki is associated to a specific virtual host it disappears from the list of wiki (http://hostname/groups/) (on all virtual hosts actually). The wiki itself can still be accessed by its explicit address: http:/hostname/groups/wikiname
If I manually edit the sql3 file directoryIndex.db in /Library/Application Support/Apple/WikiServer
and replace the specific host name by "*", the wiki reappears in the wiki list but on ALL virtual host. Still it remains accessible only in the one designated in the wiki Settings.
Most frustrating. Any workaround ? Seems like a bug but the wiki implementation being so convoluted I am not completely sure.
Any help ?
Thanks
Paul

Hi,
Seems to work on my test ASA
Attached it to my current LAN interface.
ASA(config)# packet-tracer input LAN tcp 10.2.11.1 12345 64.156.192.154 80
Phase: 1
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 WAN
Phase: 2
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype: log
Result: ALLOW
Config:
access-group outbound_access in interface LAN
access-list outbound_access extended permit object-group obj_Meraki_outbound object-group obj_Meraki_lan object-group obj_Meraki_pub
object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object tcp destination eq www
service-object tcp destination eq 7734
service-object tcp destination eq 7752
service-object udp destination eq 7351
object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
network-object 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240
network-object 10.5.11.0 255.255.255.240
object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
description: This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki.
network-object host 64.156.192.154
network-object host 64.62.142.12
network-object host 64.62.142.2
network-object host 74.50.51.16
network-object host 74.50.56.218
Additional Information:
access-list outbound_access line 1 extended permit tcp 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240 host 64.156.192.154 eq www (hitcnt=1) 0x4d812691
Also have used such configuration in some special cases where the customer has insisted on allow specific TCP/UDP ports between multiple networks. And nothing is stopping from adding ICMP into the "object-group service" also.
- Jouni

Which J2EE servers and shared virtual hosting

We currently host our clients websites on an IIS server., using sharded virtual hosting
I am looking to transfer these clients to a new dedicated server option made available by our hosting supplier. I would like to transfer those sites to a J2EE server that would then run on the new dedicated server.
My question is, which server to use? I have most expereince with the Sun App Server 8.1 - would the platform edition suffice for this task? i.e. for hosting multiple domains on a single hardware server?
Is it possible to setup virtual domains for use on the Sun platform edition server? I couldnt find any doc for this kind of thing anywhere.
Ive trawled google and yahoo and cant seem to find the answers I'm loking for.
Many thanks.
C.

Can I ask what kind of applications you're using
Tomcat for? The sites I have are all shopping cart
based, product catalogue etc - nothing too extreme.
If it were you would you just use servlets for the DB
accesses?I also have shopping cart and catalog applications. I'm using Hibernate for my database access. The servlets call into Hibernate to read and write to the DB.
I had read somewhere that using Entity EJBs resulted
in many more DB hits that were really neccessary, so
maybe I should just stick to JSPs and servlets.I feel that EJBs have a place but that for smaller sites it can be a bit of overkill. If you're running an amazon.com and you have a cluster of 20 machines upfront with some mongo database in the back then EJBs would be essential. But if you have an installation like I do with a single server talking to a single database and managed by a single person then I feel that the added complexity is more than it is worth.
For the begginer, J2EE can be a bit of a minefield!Yeah - there is alot to it. And, as we're talking about, the API's are just the first step.

BEA Proxy Plugin and Apache Virtual Hosts

I have a setup of different Apache (2.0.63) Instances with BEA-Proxy Plugin (10.0 MP1):
<VirtualHost *>
ServerName server1.tld
<IfModule mod_weblogic.c>
MatchExpression */app1/* WebLogicHost=app1.com|WebLogicPort=1234
</IfModule>
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost *>
ServerName server2.tld
<IfModule mod_weblogic.c>
MatchExpression */app2/* WebLogicHost=app2.com|WebLogicPort=1234
</IfModule>
</VirtualHost>
Now I can access to this applications through apache by:
http://server1.tld/app1/... and
http://server2.tld/app2/
this is ok, but it's also possible to access:
http://server1.tld/app2/... and
http://server2.tld/app1/
Is this still a know bug? I have found this issue also in the old BEA forum, but there was also no solution.
Does anybody know a workaround?
Thanks,
Chris

Hi,
I have a similar problem, I'm running apache 2.2 on windows and oc4j 10.1.3.4.0.
I'd like to map http://app1.example.com/home.html in apache to http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1/home.html and http://app2.example.com/home.html to http://10.1.1.3:8888/app2/home.html
I have the ProxyPass settings in my httpd.conf file
ProxyPass / http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1
ProxyPassReverse / http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1
This works fine for the first URL and the browser shows the correct page at http://app1.example.com/home.html however as soon as I click a link in the page the browser tries to go to http://app1.example.com/app1/page2.html
And since I have my ProxyPass mapping in apache, I think its trying to get to the following page in oc4j http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1/app1/page2.html which doesn't exist.
Is there any way to map a subdomain/virtual host to an oc4j context but hide from the browser the oc4j context in each of the URLs.
To make matters more tiricky (or maybe not), I'm using Struts 1.3.10 as my application framework, so I don't normally construct the <a> links myself but have Struts do that for me with <html:link> tags.
Thanks in advance for any pointers,
Andy.

Problem with DNS and/or Virtual Host (works from inside, not from outside)

I am running several web sites (as virtual hosts) successfully on one Xserve (192.168.200), which are accessible internally and from the Internet (via forwarding port 80 on our firewall).
Now I am trying to add another web site (newmini.domain.com), which however is running on a Mac mini (also on the same subnet as the Xserve) at 192.168.100. What I did is make an additional entry under the Xserve's DNS for the domain (domain.com) (+ Machine..., pointing to 192.168.0.100). (I also made the necessary changes to the Mac mini's httpd and hosts configuration--no problem there).
Now, here's the strange thing: All computers on the subnet, whose DNS points to the Xserve, can see and browse newmini.domain.com fine. No problem. The computers ask the Xserve for the IP of the host in question, the Xserve says, "192.168.100", the request goes to the Mac mini, and it serves the web site as expected.
But this doesn't happen if the request comes from the Internet. Instead of seeing the Mac mini, the client sees the default web site of the Xserve... So it appears that somewhere, the virtual host part of the HTTP request is lost between our firewall and the Xserve.
Any ideas? Thanks.

It's not going to.
You say you've setup port forwarding on the firewall. Port forwarding only cares about the port number (80). It knows nothing about the nature of the request (e.g. the hostname that the web request is for). Therefore all extenal connections on port 80 get sent to the XServe. The newmini doesn't see the traffic at all.
If you only have a single public IP address you can only forward port 80 traffic to a single machine. Your options are to either use a different port number, or configure the XServe to proxy the connection to the mini (so now the traffic goes router -> XServe -> Mini -> XServe -> router), although that might not do what you want since it still places load and dependencies on the XServe.

Creating multiple virtual hosts on localhost failed

For developing a website I want to setup some virtual hosts on the localhost of the OS X Server.
Trying to setup them up via "Services -> Websites -> [+]" failed because the domain name won't be resolved.
I creates a virtual host called "thewebsite.site" some time ago - this virtual host works well although the bullet next
to the "thewebsite.site" within the domain name imput fields actually shows red (for my complete irritation it sometimes
the bullet turns to green for a while - I don't know why and when because I changed nothing)

Thanks for your explainations but it keeps frustrating me. I'll try to give an exact overview to my settings and my tries to implement your suggestions:
Computer name: MacBook Pro
Host: server.local
Wi-Fi: 192.168.178.100 (static, as I said no DHCP)
DNS-Settings:
Forwarding Servers: 192.168.178.100
Perform lookups for only some clients: "The server itself" and "Clients on the local network"
Host name: server.local
IP address: 192.168.178.100
(no aliases)
automatically created after setting this host name:
     Primary zone: server.local
     Machine: zone: server.local, host name: server.local, IP address: 192.168.178.100
     Nameserver: zone: server.local, Name-server: server.local
Now I create a new host:
Host name: thenewwebsite.site
IP address: 192.168.178.100
(no aliases)
automatically created after setting this host name:
     Primary zone: thenewwebsite.site
     Machine: zone: thenewwebsite.site, host name: thenewwebsite.site, IP address: 192.168.178.100
     Nameserver: zone: thenewwebsite.site, Name-server: thenewwebsite.site
Now going to "Web" service:
hit the [+] button
domain-name: thenewwebsite.site
--> and it gives me the red bullet again saying it could not resolve this and trying to load "thenewwebsite.site" from the browser consequently fails.
I also tried to set the machine-zone and the nameserver-zone for the thenewwebsite.site host to server.local - didn't changed anything, loading "thenewwebsite.site" fails.
Designed in California, designed to make ist easier ??? huu ???

OC4J and Apache Virtual Hosts

Server Setup
OS Version: Windows Server 2003 64bit
Server Version: Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.3.1.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server
API Version: 19990320:18
Run Mode: standalone
I have setup two seperate Apache VirtualHosts address1.mycompany.com and address2.mycompany.com I have also setup 2 seperate OC4J application groups appgroup1 and appgroup2. I need to tie appgroup1 to the virtualhost address1.mycompany.com and appgroup2 to address2.mycompany.com. There will be two seperate applications running on each app group and they both need to run at the root level of the address .... instead of running like so address1.mycompany.com/application1 ....
Is this possible to do with this version of Oracle Application Server. I have seen that in the Weblogic version there are ways in which to do this, but due to a deadline and my limited knowledge of Weblogic at this point I am unable to go that direction ... Any help with this would be greatly appreciated and well recieved.
Edited by: Steve Carlson on Jan 23, 2009 3:41 PM

Hi,
I have a similar problem, I'm running apache 2.2 on windows and oc4j 10.1.3.4.0.
I'd like to map http://app1.example.com/home.html in apache to http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1/home.html and http://app2.example.com/home.html to http://10.1.1.3:8888/app2/home.html
I have the ProxyPass settings in my httpd.conf file
ProxyPass / http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1
ProxyPassReverse / http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1
This works fine for the first URL and the browser shows the correct page at http://app1.example.com/home.html however as soon as I click a link in the page the browser tries to go to http://app1.example.com/app1/page2.html
And since I have my ProxyPass mapping in apache, I think its trying to get to the following page in oc4j http://10.1.1.3:8888/app1/app1/page2.html which doesn't exist.
Is there any way to map a subdomain/virtual host to an oc4j context but hide from the browser the oc4j context in each of the URLs.
To make matters more tiricky (or maybe not), I'm using Struts 1.3.10 as my application framework, so I don't normally construct the <a> links myself but have Struts do that for me with <html:link> tags.
Thanks in advance for any pointers,
Andy.

OAM Webgate installation on APache with multiple Virtual hosts?

Hi I have customer who is having One Single APache web server and having two different applications configured as different Virutal hosts in the single server.
requirement is , Each application should be protected by OAM Webgate and each application have seperate session configurations. So, How can we handle this ..
I am thinking to install webgate for each application virutal Host to fulfill this requirement but i am worrying about the Webgate installation since both applications on single Apache server and single httpd.conf file.
Really appreciated if anyone suggest me the approach of how to fulfil this requirement.
-Srini
Edited by: user567398 on Jun 17, 2011 3:00 PM

Hi Srini,
You can use a single WebGate - in the "Preferred HTTP Host" setting for the WebGate in the Access System Console, specify SERVER_NAME. OAM will then use the name of the Virtual Host (as returned by Apache) when evaluating policies, and you can have different policies by having different Host Identifiers for the two (or more) virtual hosts.
Regards,
Colin

V6 and Multiple Virtual Sensors

In a few places, we have a sensor both behind and in front of a firewall and both of them are underutilized. With v6, it would seem that monitoring both links using separate physical monitoring interfaces and virtual sensors would be possible. I'm concerned about problems this might cause. For example, I already know that today CSMARS doesn't include the interface from the original raw message, so I won't be able to differentiate based on that. Will CSMARS toss the "duplicate" event anyway? Any other reasons this configuration isn't advisable? Anyone doing this in production today?

Well the normalizer engine gets affected by putting your IPS in front and behind your firewall. With different Virtual sensor you would be able to take out this issue. I had some issues with this. So what i did was to have my IPS inline pair behind the PIX firewall and have promiscous port connect outside. Something like you have your Router connect to your hub and your pix outside connect to the hub too. Then you have a promiscous port connected to this hub. This way you would know the attacks happening outside of your Firewall. This is what i use, but my design is a bit more than this and i have a specific reason to use the hub here.
-Hoogen

2nd virtual host, and external Internet site

The first virtual host is setup for our internal users.
The plan is to setup a second virtual host for an external internet portal for customers.
Do I need a second SSL certificate, and second wallet ?
Should this run another IP and therefore need another NIC card in the application server host?

You can use Virtual Hosts in SAP systems to deliver a specific set of ICF services. In the same host:port running the WAS you can have multiple virtual hosts each delivering a set of ICF services.
Check this documentation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/85/5c543aa24b511ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
You use external aliases to give meaningful name for the running services. The external alias can be used to access the service.
Check this documentation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/78/9852bdc06b11d4ad310000e83539c3/content.htm
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards,
Prasanna Krishnamurthy

How to confiture virtual hosts with multiple domain names

hello,
I've read through some of the postings here on virtual hosts, but I thought I'd better solicit advice before I actually try some of the things I've read about.
In a nutshell, I've purchased multiple domain names that I'd like to alias to a new site (currently it is just a subfolder in the main site directory) on my OS 10.3.x server. There is only the one main site configured right now on the box, so I know I need to set up a second "virtual site" pointing to the files in this subfolder to make it function as its own site.
I've dabbled around with the sites settings in the GUI, but I'd probably be most comfortable setting all this up in the httpd.conf by hand if I could. But I'm weary of this because I know it might be better to use the GUI because of OS X Server's flavor of WebObjects and Apache (sigh).
So, I have two main questions:
1) How would I set up this second site using the GUI in server settings? Do I need to first move the subfolder out of the main folder before it can be designated its own site? Or can I just point to it in the GUI? Can I use one of my purchased domain names in the domain field?
2) Currently, I have URL Forwarding set with my multiple domain names, but I'm thinking there might be a better way to do this? For SEO I'd rather use some type of redirect rather than being penalized by search engines for having what looks to be multiple domains pointing to the same site.I'm thinking I should create virtual sites for each domain name I've purchased with a hard redirect back to the main site?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 10.3.9 Server
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 10.3.9 Server

thank you for your reply.
> You can create each site as a new Site in Server
Admin. When you do this you can choose any
directory on disk as the document root for each
site.This means you can move the sites' folders out of
/Library/WebServer/Documents if you like - you could
create /Library/WebServer/site1,
/Library/WebServer/site2, etc. (or even be outside of
/Library/WebServer if you want).
so, are you are saying that I could designate one site to be
/Library/WebServer/Documents/site1
and another to be
/Library/WebServer/Documents/site1/directory1
even though directory1 is contained within site1's structure? I'm not advancing this as a good idea, necessarily. I'm just wondering if Apache would complain.
> Each site should have the domain name set as per your
registered domains. Apache will need this to
determine the correct site to serve for each
request.
Well, after some additional research I'm thinking I'm missing a critical piece of the puzzle. That being access to the DNS host server that manages the context of my server. I have purchased domain names through an outside registrar that point to my site and I can create virtual hosts on my server, but I don't have the ability to add the new virtual host names into the DNS server that manages my box. If that makes sense. Or maybe I'm missing something?
>
I'm not sure why you're using URL forwarding at all.
Without that piece of information it's impossible to
tell you whether you should continue using them or
not - in general there's no need to use URL
forwarding if you have multiple Virtual Hosts setup,
but it sounds like you have multiple hostnames
pointing to the same content, so your needs may be
different.
I'm using forwarding for the reason I list above. I didn't purchase hosting with the registrar where I purchased my domain names, so they are parked on the registrar's name server with URL forwarding to my server. The DNS server that manages my box resides in a different location and I don't have the ability to add DNS entries pointing to virtual hosts that I want to set up. Am I stuck?
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 10.3.9 Server

PlsqlCGIEnvironmentList for multiple apache virtual host

a question that's still related to the following thread
APEX Charts - Error XML Loading falied
APEX Charts - Error XML Loading falied
Hi,
I have multiple apache virtual host for my apex instance. I have trouble loading the flash chart in my virtual hosts.
I followed the instruction on the above link, it works.
PlsqlCGIEnvironmentList HTTP_HOST=<my friendly URL>:80
My question is what if I have multiple virtual hosts?
Has anyone done this before?
Thanks.
-Joel

Hi Jari,
You mean these parameter
PlsqlCGIEnvironmentList SERVER_NAME=external.server.com
PlsqlCGIEnvironmentList SERVER_PORT=80
How are those different from HTTP_HOST and what if I have multiple host (virtual)?
Cheers,
-Joel

WAS and multiple virtual Host

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for