Ways to improve the performance of my query?

Hi all,
I have created a multi provider which enables to fetch the data from 3 ods. And each ods contains huge amount of data. As a result my query performance is very slow..
apart from creating indexes on ods? is there any other to be carried out to improve the performance of my query. Since all the 3 info providers are ods.
thanxs
haritha

Haritha,
If you still need more info, just have a look below:
There are few ways your queries can be improved:
1. Your Data volume in your InfoProviders.
2. Dim table, how you have manage your objects into your dim table.
3. Query that runs from multiprovider vs cube itself. when running from multiproviders at the time of execution the system has to create more tables hence the query performance will be affected.
4. Aggregates into the cube, and they perfection of designing the aggregates.
5. OLAPCHACHE
6. Calculation formula
etc.
and also you can go thru the links below:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c8c4d794-0501-0010-a693-918a17e663cc
Hope this helps you.
****Assign Points*******
Gattu

Similar Messages

HI All, How to improve the performance in given query?

HI All,
How to improve the performance in given query?
Query is..
PARAMETERS : p_vbeln type lips-vbeln.
DATA : par_charg TYPE LIPS-CHARG,
par_werks TYPE LIPS-WERKS,
PAR_MBLNR TYPE MSEG-MBLNR .
SELECT SINGLE charg
werks
INTO (par_charg, par_werks)
FROM lips
WHERE vbeln = p_vbeln.
IF par_charg IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT single max( mblnr )
INTO par_mblnr
FROM mseg
WHERE bwart EQ '101'
AND werks EQ par_werks (index on werks only)
AND charg EQ par_charg.
ENDIF.
Regards
Steve

Hi steve,
Can't you use the material in your query (and not only the batch)?
I am assuming your system has an index MSEG~M by MANDT + MATNR + WERKS (+ other fields). Depending on your system (how many different materials you have), this will probably speed up the query considerably.
Anyway, in our system we ended up by creating an index by CHARG, but leave as a last option, only if selecting by matnr and werks is not good enough for your scenario.
Hope this helps,
Rui Dantas

Please help me how to improve the performance of this query further.

Hi All,
Please help me how to improve the performance of this query further.
Thanks.

Hi,
this is not your first SQL tuning request in this community -- you really should learn how to obtain performance diagnostics.
The information you posted is not nearly enough to even start troubleshooting the query -- you haven't specified elapsed time, I/O, or the actual number of rows the query returns.
The only piece of information we have is saying that your query executes within a second. If we believe this, then your query doesn't need tuning. If we don't, then we throw it away
and we're left with nothing.
Start by reading this blog post: Kyle Hailey &raquo; Power of DISPLAY_CURSOR
and applying this knowledge to your case.
Best regards,
Nikolay

Is there a way to improve the performance of a report group?

Hi gurus,
Is there a way to improve the performance of a report group?
Points will be given later....
Thanks!

Hi there,
Thank you for your response. I thought there's no answer for this issue and planning to change it to ALV.
I looked at the codes and debugged it. After the select statement from ZZUWT table (customized), there's a loop that takes much time (10-12mins) for 1000 records. and several nested perform routines. It's a standard program so I'm hesitant to edit it.
I'll be checking on the primary keys. If it's ok, may I ask for your assistance in this part? Though I'm not that familiar and haven't tried creating a report painter before.
Thanks anyway...:D

Is There any way to improve the performance on this code

Hi all can any one tell me how to improve the performance of this below code.
Actually i need to calculate opening balance of gl account so instead of using bseg am using bsis
So is there any way to improve this code performance.
Any help would be appreciated.
REPORT ZTEMP5 NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING LINE-SIZE 190.
data: begin of collect occurs 0,
       MONAT TYPE MONAT,
       HKONT TYPE HKONT,
       BELNR TYPE BELNR_D,
       BUDAT TYPE BUDAT,
       WRBTR TYPE WRBTR,
       SHKZG TYPE SHKZG,
       SGTXT TYPE SGTXT,
       AUFNR TYPE AUFNR_NEU,
       TOT   LIKE BSIS-WRBTR,
end of collect.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_BSIS,
       MONAT TYPE MONAT,
       HKONT TYPE HKONT,
       BELNR TYPE BELNR_D,
       BUDAT TYPE BUDAT,
       WRBTR TYPE WRBTR,
       SHKZG TYPE SHKZG,
       SGTXT TYPE SGTXT,
       AUFNR TYPE AUFNR_NEU,
END OF TY_BSIS.
DATA: IT_BSIS TYPE TABLE OF TY_BSIS,
      WA_BSIS TYPE TY_BSIS.
DATA: TOT TYPE WRBTR,
      SUMA TYPE WRBTR,
      VALUE TYPE WRBTR,
      VALUE1 TYPE WRBTR.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK B1.
PARAMETERS: S_HKONT LIKE WA_BSIS-HKONT DEFAULT '0001460002' .
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_BUDAT FOR WA_BSIS-BUDAT,
                S_AUFNR FOR WA_BSIS-AUFNR DEFAULT '200020',
                S_BELNR FOR WA_BSIS-BELNR.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK B1.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT.
LOOP AT SCREEN.
    IF SCREEN-NAME = 'S_HKONT'.
      SCREEN-INPUT = 0.
      MODIFY SCREEN.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
START-OF-SELECTION.
SELECT MONAT
         HKONT
         BELNR
         BUDAT
         WRBTR
         SHKZG
         SGTXT
         AUFNR
         FROM BSIS
         INTO TABLE IT_BSIS
         WHERE HKONT EQ S_HKONT
         AND   BELNR IN S_BELNR
         AND   BUDAT IN S_BUDAT
         AND   AUFNR IN S_AUFNR.
* if sy-subrc <> 0.
*    message 'No Data' type 'I'.
* endif.
SELECT SUM( WRBTR )
         FROM BSIS
         INTO COLLECT-TOT
         WHERE HKONT EQ S_HKONT
         AND BUDAT < S_BUDAT-LOW
         AND AUFNR IN S_AUFNR.
END-OF-SELECTION.
CLEAR: S_BUDAT, S_AUFNR, S_BELNR, S_HKONT.
LOOP AT IT_BSIS INTO WA_BSIS.
IF wa_bsis-SHKZG = 'H'.
   wa_bsis-WRBTR = 0 - wa_bsis-WRBTR.
ENDIF.
    collect-MONAT = wa_bsis-monat.
    collect-HKONT = wa_bsis-hkont.
    collect-BELNR = wa_bsis-belnr.
    collect-BUDAT = wa_bsis-budat.
    collect-WRBTR = wa_bsis-wrbtr.
    collect-SHKZG = wa_bsis-shkzg.
    collect-SGTXT = wa_bsis-sgtxt.
    collect-AUFNR = wa_bsis-aufnr.
    collect collect into collect.
    CLEAR: COLLECT, WA_BSIS.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT COLLECT.
    AT end of HKONT.
      WRITE:/65 'OpeningBalance',
             85 collect-tot.
      skip 1.
    ENDAT.
    WRITE:/06 COLLECT-BELNR,
           22 COLLECT-BUDAT,
           32 COLLECT-WRBTR,
           54 COLLECT-SGTXT.
    AT end of MONAT.
      SUM.
      WRITE:/ COLLECT-MONAT COLOR 1.
      WRITE:32 COLLECT-WRBTR COLOR 1.
      VALUE = COLLECT-WRBTR.
      SKIP 1.
    ENDAT.
    VALUE1 = COLLECT-TOT + VALUE.
    AT end of MONAT.
      WRITE:85 VALUE1.
    ENDAT.
endloop.
CLEAR: COLLECT, SUMA, VALUE, VALUE1.
TOP-OF-PAGE.
WRITE:/06 'Doc No',
         22 'Post Date',
         39 'Amount',
         54 'Text'.
Moderator message : See the Sticky threads (related for performance tuning) in this forum. Thread locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Oct 13, 2011 11:12 AM

Hi Ben,
both BSIS selects would become faster if you can add Company Code BUKRS as 1st field of WHERE clause, because it's the 1st field of primary key and HKONT is the 2nd field of primary key.
If you have no table index with HKONT as 1st field it's a full database access.
If possible, try to add BUKRS as 1st field of WHERE clause, otherwise ask for an additional BSIS index at your basis team.
Regards,
Klaus

Improving the performance of this query

Hi, Do you see any change we could do on this to improve its performance, pls, I appreciate you taking few minutes to help with analysing and tuining it
select hoc.hoc_id,
hoc.mstr_key_id,
address.DISP_NME,
blck.st_blck_id,
blck.mstr_key_id as blck_mstr_key,
bldg.BLDG_ID,
hoc.BLDG_KEY_ID,
address.OCPD_IND,
address.TP_TYPE_CDE,
'' as cmbcNumber,
'' as tpSiteNumber,
case
when address.cmbc_id is not null then amsowner.ams_038_direct_connect.GetMobilierForCMB(address.cmbc_id)
when address.lbc_id is not null and address.cmbc_id is null then amsowner.ams_038_direct_connect.GetMobilierForLBC(address.lbc_id)
END as Mobilier,
choice.cnsmr_chce_ind,
hoc.SRT_IND,
hoc.DLVRY_IND,
case valRES_STAT_CDE
when 123444 then hoc.cse_sprtn_wdth
when 123555 then hoc_pend.cse_sprtn_wdth
when 123666 then hoc_pend.cse_sprtn_wdth
end as cse_sprtn_wdth,
case valRES_STAT_CDE
when 123444 then hoc.admail_color_id
when 123555 then hoc.admail_color_id
when 123666 then hoc_pend.admail_color_id
end as admail_color_id,
case valRES_STAT_CDE
when 123444 then hoc.tieout
when 123555 then hoc_pend.tieout
when 123666 then hoc_pend.tieout
end as tieout,
hoc.callr_Ind,
hoc.PCKUP_ind,
case
when hldout.hld_out_id > 0 then 33
else 34
end as HLDOUT_IND,
case valRES_STAT_CDE
when 123444 then hoc.BREAKER_CARD_NUM
when 123555 then hoc_pend.BREAKER_CARD_NUM
when 123666 then hoc_pend.BREAKER_CARD_NUM
end as BREAKER_CARD_IND,
Case
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123444 and hoc.MP_ID is not null and hoc.MP_ID <> 0 then 33
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123555 and hoc_pend.MP_ID is not null and hoc_pend.MP_ID <> 0 then 33
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123666 and hoc_pend.MP_ID is not null and hoc_pend.MP_ID <> 0 then 33
else 34 END as MP_IND,
case
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123444 then hoc.LCRMS_SEQ_NUM
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123555 then hoc_pend.DEL_SEQ
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123666 then hoc_pend.DEL_SEQ
END as DEL_SEQ,
case
when (hoc_type_cde = 154 and hoc.MP_ID is not null ) then (NVL(mp.SLCLRES_RATE , 0)+ NVL(mp.OSSDRES_RATE,0))
when (hoc_type_cde = 154 and hoc.MP_ID is null ) then (NVL(asmt.SLCLRES_RATE , 0)+ NVL(asmt.OSSDRES_RATE,0))
when (hoc_type_cde = 156 and hoc.MP_ID is not null )then (NVL(mp.SLCLCOM_RATE,0) + NVL(mp.OSSDCOM_RATE,0))
when (hoc_type_cde = 156 and hoc.MP_ID is null ) then (NVL(asmt.SLCLCOM_RATE,0) + NVL(asmt.OSSDCOM_RATE,0))
else 0
END As AvgMail,
Case
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123444 then hoc.drct_ind
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123555 then hoc_pend.drct_ind
when valRES_STAT_CDE = 123666 then hoc_pend.drct_ind
END as drct_ind,
Case
when pc.ldu_type_cde in (492, 564, 565, 566, 567 ) then 33
else 34
end as lvr_ind,
hoc.A12_CARD_IND,
hoc.DNC_CARD_IND,
hoc.CARD_IND,
hoc.FRCE_CARD_IND,
hoc.EXTRA_CARD_NBR,
hoc.TTL_HOC_CNT,
--(select BSNS_NME_EN from occupant where occupant.ADDR_MAIL_ID = address.addr_id and occupant.prmry_ind = 33 and rownum <= 1 )as PRIMARY_BUS_NME_EN,
--(select BSNS_NME_FR from occupant where occupant.ADDR_MAIL_ID = address.addr_id and occupant.prmry_ind = 33 and rownum <= 1 )as PRIMARY_BUS_NME_FR,
blck.blck_seq,
address.ADDR_NUM,
address.ADDR_SFX_CDE,
address.ADDR_STE_NUM,
hoc.HOC_TYPE_CDE,
hoc.CSE_SPRTN_GRP_ID,
pc.pc_id As pc_id,
pc.disp_nme as pc_disp_nme,
hoc.bag_ind,
hoc.CASETAG,
occupant.BSNS_NME_EN as PRIMARY_BUS_NME_EN , occupant.BSNS_NME_FR as PRIMARY_BUS_NME_FR
from amsowner.AMS_038_HOC hoc
left join amsowner.ams_038_hoc_pndng hoc_pend
on hoc.MSTR_KEY_ID = hoc_pend.MSTR_KEY_ID
inner join amsowner.AMS_038_ST_BlCK blck
on hoc.st_blck_key_id = blck.mstr_key_id
inner join amsowner.postal_code pc
on blck.pc_id = pc.pc_id
left join amsowner.AMS_038_bldg bldg
on hoc.BLDG_KEY_ID = bldg.MSTR_KEY_ID
inner join amsowner.address address
on address.addr_id = hoc.addr_mail_id
inner join amsowner.addr_lctn_to_mail locToMail
on locToMail.addr_mail_id = address.addr_id
inner join amsowner.addr_chce choice
on choice.addr_id = locToMail.addr_lctn_id
left join occupant on (occupant.ADDR_MAIL_ID = address.addr_id and occupant.prmry_ind = 33)
left join amsowner.ams_038_hld_out hldout
on (hldout.mstr_key_id = hoc.mstr_key_id and hldout.end_dte is null)
left join amsowner.ams_038_dm dm
on dm.dm_id = blck.dm_id
left join ams_038_assmt asmt
on blck.pc_id = asmt.pc_id and asmt.dpt_cde_nme = valDpt_cde_nme and ((asmt.case_type_cde = 1220 and dm.a62_cse_ind = 33) or (asmt.case_type_cde = 1219 and dm.a62_cse_ind = 34))
left join ams_038_mail_prfl mp
on hoc.mp_id = mp.mp_id and ((mp.case_type_cde = 1220 and dm.a62_cse_ind = 33) or (mp.case_type_cde = 1219 and dm.a62_cse_ind = 34))
where hoc.mstr_key_id = valMSTR_KEY_ID and blck.DPT_CDE_NME = valDpt_cde_nme and hoc.DPT_CDE_NME = valDpt_cde_nme and blck.RSTRCTR_STAT_CDE = restCode;
Thanks a lot :)

Hi and welcome to the forum.
I appreciate you taking few minutes to help with analysing and tuining itUnfortunatly it's not that simple.
We would need some more input here, like:
- database version
- optimizer settings
- execution plans
-etc..
Tuning is a complex matter, since many parameters come into play here.
If you want some useful responses then see:
[When your query takes too long...|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=3299435]
[How to post a SQLStatement tuning request|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=863295&tstart=0]
to understand what information would also be very useful to us (and, if needed, have your DBA participating in this as well).

A possible way to improve the performance of MainStage

Some of you may know that I haven't bothered much with MainStage and Logic recently having had a lot of grief with them over the last year.
However, I just discovered some articles written about OS X memory management and the positive impact of disabling the dynamic paging system on a Mac (meaning no more virtual memory). It seems to be the case that disabling dynamic paging is improving the general responsiveness of a Mac very significantly. While some are claiming that it's only good for Snow Leopard, others are saying it works with Lion as well. My experience is that it indeed works well.
Here's a link to an article that talks about the issue and describes how to disable paging. Mileage may vary but I think it might be worthwhile for those who have reported problems with MS and Logic due to overloads to try it out.
Here's where I first found out about it
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/20464780085/something-is-deeply-broken-in-os-x- memory-management
and here's a discussion in MacWorld about it
http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=201106020948369
I'd be very interested to know how it goes.
D

Hi there,
Thank you for your response. I thought there's no answer for this issue and planning to change it to ALV.
I looked at the codes and debugged it. After the select statement from ZZUWT table (customized), there's a loop that takes much time (10-12mins) for 1000 records. and several nested perform routines. It's a standard program so I'm hesitant to edit it.
I'll be checking on the primary keys. If it's ok, may I ask for your assistance in this part? Though I'm not that familiar and haven't tried creating a report painter before.
Thanks anyway...:D

I'm trying to improve the performance on a query that is running very slowly.

SELECT p.book_id AS payment_book_id, b.status AS book_status,
       p.status AS payment_status, p.supplier_ref_no AS data_cash_ref,
       f.train_pnr_no AS train_pnr, f.train_id AS train_ref_id,
       f.service_no AS train_service_no, h.hotel_pnr_no AS hotel_pnr,
       h.hotel_id AS hotel_ref_id, h.service_no AS hotel_service_no,
       b.total_book_amt AS hotel_amt, c.car_pnr_no AS car_pnr,
       c.car_id AS car_ref_id, c.service_no AS car_service_no,
       b.book_date, b.promo_code
FROM gk_payment p
LEFT JOIN gk_book b ON b.book_id = p.book_id
LEFT JOIN gk_train_itiner_det f ON p.book_id = f.book_id
LEFT JOIN gk_hotel_itiner_det h ON p.book_id = h.book_id
LEFT JOIN gk_car_itiner_det c ON p.book_id = c.book_id
WHERE ((b.status IN ('8') AND p.status IN ('2', '0', '1', '8', '7')) OR
       (b.status IN ('5') AND p.status IN ('3')) OR
       (b.status IN ('11') AND p.status IN ('4', '5')))
       AND p.service_no IS NOT NULL
       AND b.book_type = 1
ORDER BY train_id, car_id

Some small comments about the query.
1) The first left join is not needed, since the where filter " AND b.book_type = 1" eliminates all cases where table b would be outer join (=empty).
FROM gk_payment p
LEFT JOIN gk_book b ON b.book_id = p.book_id
2) The status comparison can be written in a different way. This will probably not change anything performancewise
instead of
WHERE ((b.status IN ('8') AND p.status IN ('2', '0', '1', '8', '7')) OR
       (b.status IN ('5') AND p.status IN ('3')) OR
       (b.status IN ('11') AND p.status IN ('4', '5')))
you can write
WHERE ((b.status,p.status))
    IN (('8','0')
        ,('8','1')
        ,('8','2')
        ,('8','7')
        ,('8','8')
        ,('5','3')
        ,('11','4')
        ,('11',53')
Which is imo much easier to read, maintain and checkable for completeness.
Furthermore: If the status fields are number columns then by all means compare them with numbers and not as strings.
3) Remove the order by condition
Is it faster without it? If yes, do you really need to order the output?

Please guide to improve the performance of XML column reading query.

Hi Experts,
The below query is taking 45 seconds to return 170 records.
Due to selecting XMLTYPE column in query.
select *
from RANGE where WSNO = 3
order by PREFERENCE desc;
The total number of records in the table is 1060.
Even it's a very small table why it's taking 45 seconds.
Can anybody please help me on how to get the output in 2 to 3 seconds.
I want all the columns from the table.
The problem only with REST column XMLTYPE.
If I am not selecting this column I am getting output in 1 to 2 seconds.
I am posting the execution plan and DDL for table and index.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3593186720
| SNO | Operation                    | EMPNAME                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |                        |    31 | 23281 |    21   (5)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |                        |    31 | 23281 |    21   (5)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | RANGE                 |    31 | 23281 |    20   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | INDX_WSNO              |    31 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (SNOentified by operation SNO):
   3 - access("WSNO"=3)
CREATE TABLE RANGE
SNO                              NUMBER,
BUSNO                            NUMBER,
EMPNAME                          NVARCHAR2(64),
PREFERENCE                       NUMBER,
TSNO                             NUMBER,
MEMBER                          CHAR(1 CHAR) ,
EQU                             CHAR(1 CHAR) ,
REMAIL                          CHAR(1 CHAR) ,
SSR                             CHAR(1 CHAR) ,
SUB                             CHAR(1 CHAR) ,
SPN                             CHAR(1 CHAR) ,
SEMPNAME                        NVARCHAR2(128),
FVL                             NUMBER(32),
TVL                             NUMBER(32),
ISD                             CHAR(1 CHAR),
CHANGED                         NVARCHAR2(64),
CDATE                           TIMESTAMP(6) ,
UDBY                            NVARCHAR2(64),
UDATE                           TIMESTAMP(6),
LSTU                            CLOB,
WSNO                            NUMBER,
ASTN                            CHAR(1 CHAR),
ASTNPL                          CHAR(1 CHAR),
AVAF                            CHAR(1 CHAR),
REST                            SYS.XMLTYPE
TABLESPACE USERS
PCTUSED    0
PCTFREE    10
INITRANS   11
MAXTRANS   255
STORAGE    (
            INITIAL          64K
            NEXT             1M
            MINEXTENTS       1
            MAXEXTENTS       UNLIMITED
            PCTINCREASE      0
            BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
XMLTYPE REST STORE AS CLOB
      ( TABLESPACE USERS
        ENABLE      STORAGE IN ROW
        CHUNK       8192
        PCTVERSION 10
        NOCACHE
        INDEX       (
          TABLESPACE USERS
          STORAGE    (
                      INITIAL          64K
                      NEXT             1
                      MINEXTENTS       1
                      MAXEXTENTS       UNLIMITED
                      PCTINCREASE      0
                      BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
        STORAGE    (
                    INITIAL          64K
                    NEXT             1M
                    MINEXTENTS       1
                    MAXEXTENTS       UNLIMITED
                    PCTINCREASE      0
                    BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
LOB (LSTU) STORE AS
      ( TABLESPACE USERS
        ENABLE      STORAGE IN ROW
        CHUNK       8192
        RETENTION
        NOCACHE
        INDEX       (
          TABLESPACE USERS
          STORAGE    (
                      INITIAL          64K
                      NEXT             1
                      MINEXTENTS       1
                      MAXEXTENTS       UNLIMITED
                      PCTINCREASE      0
                      BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
        STORAGE    (
                    INITIAL          64K
                    NEXT             1M
                    MINEXTENTS       1
                    MAXEXTENTS       UNLIMITED
                    PCTINCREASE      0
                    BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
MONITORING;
CREATE INDEX INDX_WSNO ON RANGE(WSNO);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX RULE_EMPNAME ON RANGE(BUSNO, EMPNAME);
Please help me how to improve the performance of this query.
Thanks.

Can you try something like this and check if its faster? (this is just my guess as I dont have your data )
SELECT SNO,
       BUSNO,
       EMPNAME,
       PREFERENCE,
       TSNO,
       MEMBER,
       EQU,
       REMAIL,
       SSR,
       SUB,
       SPN,
       SEMPNAME,
       FVL,
       TVL,
       ISD,
       CHANGED,
       CDATE,
       UDBY,
       UDATE,
       LSTU,
       WSNO,
       ASTN,
       ASTNPL,
       AVAF,
       xmltype.getclobval (rest) rest
FROM RANGE
WHERE wsno = 3
order by PREFERENCE desc;
Cheers,
Manik.

How to improve the Performance of Swing Components

Hi
I have developed a GUI Framework with Swing components. I observed that when number of components are more, the GUI is slow. Could anybody suggest me the ways to improve the performance of Swing Components
Thanks

Hi There - I haven't found issues so far with the speed of the GUI building, it seems fast when compared with .NET applications
Are you doing any database querying on form load? This can slow down the loading of the GUI, I use persistence in an application and before the GUI is shown the persistence unit logs in to the database and registers itself - it does take 2/3 seconds to register and complete whatever it does before the form builds and shows
Also check if you are loading/using any network based files on form load, this can also slow down the building considerably as well. Apart from that it's hard to say where your issue may lie apart from removing controls and checking build speed until you find the one that's slowing it down (not a good approach though) I sometimes had to load csv files from a network drive and if the file server is slow or LAN speed isn't great this can also cause a delay, hope you find it.....

Improve the performance of filter

Hi All,
We are using Oracle Coherence Standard Edition in our application.
Any way to improve the performance of NamedCache.keySet(filter) configured as distributed?
I know there is no scope for indexing since we are using Standard Edition.
Thanks

user1096084 wrote:
Hi All,
We are using Oracle Coherence Standard Edition in our application.
Any way to improve the performance of NamedCache.keySet(filter) configured as distributed?
I know there is no scope for indexing since we are using Standard Edition.
ThanksNot only is there no indexing, but also, I believe, all data is sent to the querying node for filtering instead of filtering on the storage nodes in parallel. If you upgraded, then you could benefit from parallel querying which is only available in a higher edition.
Best regards,
Robert

How can we improve the performance while fetching data from RESB table.

Hi All,
Can any bosy suggest me the right way to improve the performance while fetching data from RESB table. Below is the select statement.
SELECT aufnr posnr roms1 roanz
    INTO (itab-aufnr, itab-pposnr, itab-roms1, itab-roanz)
    FROM resb
    WHERE kdauf = p_vbeln
    AND   ablad = itab-sposnr+2.
Here I am using 'KDAUF' & 'ABLAD' in condition. Can we use secondary index for improving the performance in this case.
Regards,
Himanshu

Hi ,
Declare intenal table with only those four fields.
and try the beloe code....
SELECT aufnr posnr roms1 roanz
INTO table itab
FROM resb
WHERE kdauf = p_vbeln
AND ablad = itab-sposnr+2.
yes, you can also use secondary index for improving the performance in this case.
Regards,
Anand .
Reward if it is useful....

How to improve the performance of policy import process

Hello OES 10g Experts,
I have an application specific policy XML of OES 10g. While importing it to OES using policyIX.sh command, the process is taking around 3.5 hrs in DEV servers. The policy XML size is around 2 MB. However there are other applications which are being imported in less than 30 mins.
Perhaps it is due to the size of the XML, the policy import process is taking huge time which may not be viable in production systems. But I would like to know if there is a way to improve the performance of import process. The command syntax I am using is
./policyIX.sh -import -disableTransaction config.xml policy.xml
I have tried removing the parameter -disableTransaction but there is no performance improvement.
Appreciate any inputs.
Thanks
Mahendra.

Go through following link:-
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/doc.1111/e14316/org_mangmnt.htm#OMUSG2741

How to improve the performance of 11i?

Dear all,
We just upgraded from 10.7 to 11i and found that the performance is not acceptable. Currently there are about 120 staff in our company. Can someone kindly suggest some way to improve the performance?
Thanks,
George

Dear Alan,
The reports are running slowly when more than one hundred users are logged in. Should we tune the database or setup another report server to shorten the report running time?
Thanks,
George

How to improve the performance in Xcelsius

Hi ,
I have nearly 5000 records in excel and when I try to import this data in to xcelsius its taking nearly 3 hrs to get imported and after that when I try ti select the sorce data again its taking more than 3 hrs .I think this is happening because I have increased max. no. of rows to 5000 but is there any way to improve the performance
Regards,
Sany

hi sany
5000 records is much to much. Xcelsius is designed for highly aggregated small data sets.
Although 5000 records may work, think about that the default maxrows value is about 512. I think this is a kind of sign.
Try to reduce you data set or dynamically refresh the data you really need at runtime.
Best regards
Ulrich
http://www.xcelsius-insight.com

Ways to improve the performance of my query?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for