Web module: exporting keywords to a template not possible?

I want to use the web module to generate my photoblog, however I need to be able to export the keywords or collections used to tag each image. The dialog box for changing the image caption allows you to export all sorts of EXIF and IPTC metadata but not the lightroom keywords.
I've already made a template for my website but the generated xml file produced by lightroom for the transformer XSLT script to process seems to have no information about the image keywords in it so I'm stuck.
I know the keywords are embedded into the actual jpegs that are exported but extracting them would be more effort than its worth, I dont want to have to run more software after exporting from the web module just to get the keywords.
Any ideas?

Looking at the XMP for a recent file, the keywords are stored as follows
     castle
     cloghan castle
     couple
     matrimony
     september
     wedding
So you'd need to figure out how to extract them from there.

Similar Messages

Web module exports all the different preview sizes

Trying out the web module - I select a flash template with extra large previews. When I export to Dreamweaver, not only are the Extra large previews exported but also large, medium etc. This means that if I upload to my server I will use far more space than necessary. Can I prevent this? Or can I simply delete all but the extra large pictures?

When exporting a Flash gallery it does export three sizes. Those three sizes are "relative" to the "preview size" setting, which you could kind of think of as setting the size for the "largest" of the three. When the gallery is loaded into a browser, the gallery automatically detects the size of the window, looks at the rendition sizes available, and then downloads the largest rendition size that will fit into the window. It then does some pretty sophisticated pre-fetching of the other images of that size based on user behavior (linear vs non-linear browsing of the gallery). The gallery does not download the other renditions at all - unless the end user changes the size of their browser window such that a different rendition size should be used. The gallery does not real-time scale the images inside Flash - except in the case where the browser window is made too small for even the smallest rendition, in which case it will scale down the image in real time (this is why your "trick" works). In Beta 4, the gallery threw scroll bars on the images themselves if the window was too small. I think the 1.0 approach is much better.
Granted this takes up extra room on the web server, (pretty cheap these days though) but if there were only one rendition, it really should be a size that will fit on 800x600 monitors - which is still well over 10% of web users, which would mean it would need to be pretty dang small given OS chrome, browser chrome, headers, etc - and then if you had thumnails across the bottom... Is all this overkill? When I look at galleries like the one at http://www.computer-darkroom.com/antarctica_2007/index.html in a maximized window on my hi-res monitor, I grow to really love the multiple rendition approach.

WEB module export image size

Team, I am
exporting just two images from the Web Mo
dule...using the basis HTML
gallery template.
The original image size is 4972K (4.9Mb)
After I select export in the web module, the resulting image is around
200K in the content\images\large directory.
I have the "Large Images" Quality slider at 100
Is is the case...that no matter what...the image will be manipulated or reduced in size by the web module engine?
I would like the original image to be exported out to the content\images\large directory.
Is this possible?
I was just on phone with support...close to two hours...disconnected twice...but the phone support folks were not aware of what I am doing.
I am using LR 3.3 in Windows...if that matters.
Thank You,
-Rich O
[email protected]

Rich,
RichO2010 wrote:
Beat, I have not made any adjustments. Not sure where "Image Pages" are. But, under the Web module, I have tried several "Large Images" quality settings under the "Output Settings"
You find this setting under the Appearance section:
I am getting the sense that no matter what...the LR Webgallery engine wants to "optimize" the images for web output.
I just want the people that visit the site, the ability to download the original image...unaltered.
I have not found a way to go beyond 2071 pixels for image width in Web Gallery.
From what i am reading so far, I think I should just let the galley engine do its work. Then come back and upload the original images under the content\images\large (or whatever the output destination might be).
That might be a way to achieve what you want. There might be side-effects regarding borders, watermarks etc.
Beat

Why Does Lightroom Web Module Export Images At 240 ppi?

Firstly, please forgive my ignorance on this subject. I am in the process of getting together a website of my images and have been experimenting with preparing the images and thumbnails through Lightroom's web module. I've noticed that when opening the finished images in Elements, that they have all been converted at 240ppi. Surely, images for websites should be at 72ppi (or possibly 96ppi)? Or am I dimmer than even I thought?

should I simply ignore the resolution box?
Yes indeed. You set the size unit box in the export dialog simply to pixels and then size the right number of pixels for your web use. Typical is for example 800 pixels on the long end. The resolution box is not relevant for web use. It is really only used as a hint to a final printing size.
So I imagine the 240ppi conversion must be the Lightroom default value. Do you think?
Very likely so. I believe Lightroom, just like Photoshop, assumes 240 for files that do not start out having the tag so that is probably what happened if this started as a scan. Many scanners do not write this tag at all, but most DSLRs write the tag into their files and it is usually 240 for older generation cameras and 300 for later ones. I don't know why they do that as it is again not relevant as people print at any size they want.

Web Module Export Settings

I import as dng and then using these create collections which I upload to my website. The images look horrible. What internal settings does LR use when it takes the dng and does the conversion for the web?

yes quality is at max 100, actually there seems to be quite a difference between the home page shot (ozphoto.org) of a model with her hand to her face vs the same shot in the gallery index under portrait.
The home page is TTG Pages and the portrait is Slideshow Pro and in both of these I have used the best settings.
Although in on my screen in the develop or library module on either one of my monitors the images are sharp?
The web module and the web seems to be degraded

Deletion of Document templates not possible - 'Ok' 'Cancel' not displayed

Hello,
I want to delete a few Document templates. I use the business role 'SALESPRO', I go to 'Document Templates', choose a template, press the button 'Delete' (icon garbage bin) and a I get a pop-up window but without the buttons 'OK', 'Cancel' .
The pop-up is empty not even the title 'Confirm Deletion'.
Why's that ?
Any hints on how I could tackle this ?
I am deep in debugging but I do not seem to get anywhere, started from here:
Class CL_CRM_OI_T_TEMPLATELIST_IMPL
METHOD eh_ondeletetempl_btn.
DATA:
    lv_title TYPE string,
    lv_text TYPE string.
IF gr_confirm_popup IS NOT BOUND.
    lv_title = 'Confirm Deletion'(001).
    lv_text = 'Do you really want to delete?'(002).
    CALL METHOD comp_controller->window_manager->create_popup_2_confirm
      EXPORTING
        iv_title          = lv_title
        iv_text           = lv_text
        iv_btncombination = if_bsp_wd_window_manager=>co_btncomb_okcancel
*        IV_CUSTOMBUTTONS =
      RECEIVING
        rv_result         = gr_confirm_popup
    gr_confirm_popup->set_on_close_event( iv_event_name = 'CONFIRM_POPUP_CLOSED' iv_view = me )."#EC NOTEXT
ENDIF.
gr_confirm_popup->open( ).
Initially I thought that there is some oscure authorization needed but the authorization trace did not show anything.
Thank you
ENDMETHOD.

Prasenjit,
I was about to post the solution. I discovered that component but the code did not even go to DO_PREPARE_OUTPUT.
The solution was to 'Disable Cookies' (marked this checkbox in the technical profile associated with the business role).
I got the idea to try this after I came across a method get_server_cookie that could not read the cookie previously set by set_server_cookie (to this extent I came to debug .

Export With Same Pixel Size Not Possible?

I'm exporting two photos from Aperture to another program for the purpose of creating one panoramic picture.
However, the other program (PFactory) only allows the stitching of photos with the exact same pixels and no matter how I try to export both photos with same pixels using Fit Within Pixels with Aperture they never come out the other end the eact same size.
One photo has 5195 x 3454 and the other has 5195 x 3459.
Anyone know why?
Thanks.

How are you trying to do this now? When you export using a "fit within" it's going to scale the image proportionately. It's not going to crop. The problem you're having is that the ratio of height to width of these two images doesn't match so "scaling" wont work... if it trims the height by a few pixels it's going to trim the width by a few pixels to maintain the aspect ratio.
You'll have to crop the larger image by 5 pixels. But this is what I had assumed you (or someone) had already done to the 2nd image. I've never seen a digital camera that puts out images in random sizes (were the images actually taken with the same camera on the same settings??)
Select the larger image, pick the 'adjustments' tab, click the 'crop' icon along the bottom left corner of the image frame. In the crop-window that opens, set the "Aspect Ratio" to "Custom" and then type in the dimensions that you want. It'll put a box on the screen to show the area it intends to keep but you can use your mouse to slide that box around. When you leave the crop mode (e.g. pick the "selection tool" icon (left-most icon in the lower left corner of the image -- or really any other mode) the image will be updated to reflect the crop (keep in mind Aperture doesn't really crop the master... it's just displaying it that way.)
Now when you export to TIFF or JPEG, etc. as "original size" the image sizes will match.

Export in Full HD Mode not possible ?

I create my movies by the Canon 5D Mark-II with 1920 x 1080 Full HD Mode.
After cutting it with iMovi I create a DVD normally.
But for the future I would like to save the movie in best quality-
The iMovi export function offer only up to 1280 by 720pix in means HD quality.
Is there any other possiblity to save the movie into the Full HD quality ?

I would like to use my movie for 2 purposes.
The first is that it is shot in 1080i and 1080p depending on which camera I'm using. As a result, I'd like to export the movie in one of those formats so that I can burn to bluray in the future.
For now, I need to burn to DVD...would I be better off exporting 1080i or 1080p and making it fit in iDVD or would I be better off if I exported 960x540 and then took that into iDVD?
Thanks.

Web module - Upload settings not saved in preset

Hi,
When creating a new preset in the Web module, the current upload settings are not saved. Which constantly leads to annoying mistakes when updating a site. I'm aware of bug reports that have been filed about this issue and the answer was "as designed". I tend to consider this as a bug.
Could someone explain this very strange design choice?
Thanks.
Patrick

nike air max 2011 is the most successful in recent years, a shoe. Not only because of the quality and 100% price guarantee and also we supply all nike shox welcomed by many customers from around the world, they often found that the length of the right to run. air jordan 2010 as the world's most popular shoe, its unique appearance, quiet feel, can show you better have a good taste, at the same time, nike shox torch can slso support cutting breathable, flexible design, open cage net cage covered by combination of insole molds to your feet in the quiet and the shape of the foot support. new jordan shoes 2010, jordan retro shoes can increase the length of the quiet end of the degree. The new damping system, combined with a suitable natural gait movement works, all are designed to bring you the most tranquil experience.Welcome to visit us:http://www.nikejordanlink.com .

Integrate a Web Module's JSP into an iView in NetWeaver CE 7.2

Hi everybody,
I am not sure whether this is the right spot to post this, but I will give it a try anyway.
We want to develop an Enterprise Application containing a Web Module. Basically it is a Java EE application that has a business tier consisting of a couple of beans and business objects and a web tier consisting of JSPs and servlets. What I want to do is to integrate it into the portal content via an iView. We only use a web module in order to integrate servlets to handle AJAX requests made via javascript and because you can only make a servlet-mapping within the web.xml (as far as I know).
Now I have created both the Enterprise Application Project as well as a Dynamic Web Project in the NWDS 7.2 according to the SAP manual. My servlet class as well as the beans are contained within the Dynamic Web Project's Java source folder. In the Web Content folder are the JSPs, css and javascript files. I deployed that application successfully via the NWDS and I can see under the application console of the NetWeaver Administrator that the application is deployed and alledgedly started, yet I cannot see it in the PCD. Therefore I cannot directly include it into a page and by that make it available to portal users. Also, I cannot access the application via the url http://<host>:<port>/<url as defined in application.xml>.
How can this be done?
Normally, I would do this by creating an iView from Template in the PCD's folder containing my designated page and role and adding it to the page as a deltalink. Yet when I try to do this, the portal offers me a long list of iView types, none of which seem to match my desire of matching a Web Module or Enterprise Application. Is that possible at all or what do I have to do to achieve this? I had no problem to integrate my application as a Portal Application, which is also deployed as an .ear, but that lacks the possibility to use servlets - at least from my understanding, since I cannot integrate a servlet-mapping into the portalapp.xml and there is no web.xml in a Portal Application.
I have been trying this for two days now and didn't succeed. Is it possible at all, and if so, how? Any help is highly appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Serg

Hello,
You can use the j2ee telnet console and using it you can deploy the files
you can follow the example given in the note
743630 - How to deploy libraries on J2EE Engine 6.20
after ADD DEPLOY
DEPLOY <filename>.SCA
I hope this should work
Regards,
Chandru

Error in web module project

hi all,
I am writting web module project where i am using servletand in that servlet i am using user data.
so i included "com.sap.security.api.jar".
when i build this project it want give any error.
but i want to deploy this on portal so i created one enterprise application project then added above web project in project reference.
but if i know build this project i get error on line "import com.sap.security.api.jar"
and if i see in web module project that jar file was not there.
please reply.
thanks
jayesh talreja

Hi,
If you use the SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio you can just use the "Organize Imports" option, this will add everything you need in your project automatically.
If not, you can choose the Build Path -> Add External Archives:
a. Browse to the location of the sap.comtcjesecurity_apiimpl.jar. In the AS Java file system, you can find this library by following the path /usr/sap/<SID>/JC<XX>/j2ee/cluster/bin/interfaces/security_api.
b. Select the JAR file and choose Open.
It shouldn't throw exceptions when you deploy your EAR project.
Best regards,
Ekaterina

Use of dynpro services is not possible in the current system status

Hi,
I am new to all of this and new to SAP. I will bew self learing my way into CRM SOA, working with the web service creaiton i keep getting the following errlr when rtying to Activate a new created web service:
"Use of dynpro services is not possible in the current system status"
not knowing the system that well i wonderin if there is missing configuration. This is CRM 7.0
Exception Class CX_SY_SEND_DYNPRO_NO_RECEIVER
Error Name DYNPRO_SEND_IN_BACKGROUND
Program SAPLSKEY
Include LSKEYU03
Line 33

Hi Keith,
Welcome to the SCN forums!
SAPLSKEY
You should first check your Abap dumps using tranaction code ST22, this usually provides more detail on the problem.
In this case I think it's trying to return a screen (or pop-up message) that can't be handled while activating the web service. The "SAPLSKEY" tells me that it might be licence related, do you have a valid developer's licence for Abap development work? If not apply for one (find out the procedure from other Abap developer's that you may work with) & check if that makes a difference while activating.
Regards, Trevor

Updating license data not possible [Maintenance Package]

Hi,
I want to activate Automatic Maintenance Certificate Renewal via solution manager system as per SNOTE: 1280660.
SOL MAN: ST400 SP 18
SCM : ST-PI 2008_1_700 SP 01
when i run Maintenance package in my managed (satellite) system i got the log as below.
Updating license data not possible [Maintenance Package]
No active master Solution Manager destination maintained. [Maintenance Package]
Updating license data completed from destination [Maintenance Package]
Maintenance Package completed
when i run Maintenance package in my Solution Manager system i got the log as below.
Refresh sessions from destination SM_KSMCLNT000_BACK started [Maintenance Package]
> error reading function module interface DSWP_API_SESSIONLIST_GET from SM_KSMCLNT000_BACK
> Logon not possible (error in license check)
> Sessions cannot be refreshed from destination SM_KSMCLNT000_BACK ( KSM , 0020472195 )
Refresh sessions from destination SM_KSMCLNT000_BACK finished [Maintenance Package]
Refresh sessions from destination SM_KSMCLNT001_BACK started [Maintenance Package]
> error reading function module interface DSWP_API_SESSIONLIST_GET from SM_KSMCLNT001_BACK
> Logon not possible (error in license check)
> Sessions cannot be refreshed from destination SM_KSMCLNT001_BACK ( KSM , 0020472195 )
Please anyone facing the same or related issue, give me a suggestion..
Thanks,
Manikandan B

Hello Manikandan
The error indicates that there is an issue with the *_back RFC destination
itself.
Have you done an authorisation check within SM59?
Utilities > Authorisation check?
You can also do so by testing the connection in SDCCN.
Goto > Taskspecific settings > RFC destination > Backdestination
This problem is often caused by the user in the RFC connection
being locked in the Solution Manager.
Make sure the RFC user account is a communication user so the password does not expire. Sometimes the password expires and the RFC user locks the account as the old expired password is provided too many times.
The message also indicated "No active master Solution Manager destination maintained"
Please make sure the relevent Solution Manager system has been marked as Master in SDCCN Goto > Taskspecific settings > RFC destination >
These are things you will want to check.
I hope this information helps you resolve this problem.
Regards,
Paul

I am having issues with my web module on Lightroom 4 (Mac OS 10.9.5). "an unknown error occurred" while trying to upload to my FTP (no changes in my FTP). Bandaid fix was to export to local folder and upload via Filezilla. However, now that is no longer w

I am having issues with my web module on Lightroom 4 (Mac OS 10.9.5). "an unknown error occurred" while trying to upload to my FTP (no changes in my FTP). Bandaid fix was to export to local folder and upload via Filezilla. However, now that is no longer working and although upload completes, the URL takes you to a "Forbidden - do not have permission to read this file" page. Lightroom is changing the permissions of each file to 000 instead of 644 for index files and 755 for all others. How can I change the permissions settings in Lightroom?

I am having issues with my web module on Lightroom 4 (Mac OS 10.9.5). "an unknown error occurred" while trying to upload to my FTP (no changes in my FTP). Bandaid fix was to export to local folder and upload via Filezilla. However, now that is no longer working and although upload completes, the URL takes you to a "Forbidden - do not have permission to read this file" page. Lightroom is changing the permissions of each file to 000 instead of 644 for index files and 755 for all others. How can I change the permissions settings in Lightroom?

Support for export keyword for templates in sunCC ?

Hello
Currently sunCC says
"OutputTemplate.hh", line 16: Warning: Export ignored -- not yet implemented.if I try to use export to export my templates.
Is sunCC going to support export keyword, like Comeau and Intel compilers ?
When will export be implemented ?
Thank you,
Timothy Madden

Then why the warning message 'not yet implemented' ? It so makes me think that in the next update there I will find it !
And it so makes my appetite for it grow ! :)
I am very sad to hear such a point of view especially as an official attitude.
I mean this reason, that there is only one implementation and the other compiler implementers did not implement it, so Sun will also not implement it, is quite ... hard to expect.
After all, all new C++ features were also not implemented by compiler implementers when they appeared, until they implemented them ...
I do not think many programmers so confuse export ed templates with extern declarations. Most programmers actually know what templates are and how they are instantiated on demand. Beside, the fact that the template definition needs not be seen by the compiler at the point of instantiation is quite true, as this is the point of using export :). The definition will just be found in one of the object files, at some point before linking.
What the "definitions-separate" default compilation model does is effectively including the template definition in every .cc file, just like I would have included it in .hh file in the first place. This is what export is to prevent: it does not include nor need the template definition until some point before linking, at which all translation units have been translated (compiled) and the template definition can be found.
It is true that in a way template instantiations use symbols from both the definition point, and the instantiation point, but this is intentional and the programmers should all well know about it. The C++ language also has quite some others such hidden effects after all ...
Merging the contexts, or instantiating the templates, should actually have nothing to do with the actual linker or the link-time, if export is to be implemented for real.
Rather the instantiation should be a separate step in the build process, after compiling and before linking, effected by a compiler-provided tool created specifically for compiling template definitions (from object files) into instances; or such a tool could be the compiler put in some special post-compile instantiaton mode. The tool would indeed be given all the object files in a program, and would resolve references between them for instantiation requests, as a linker does, so it might look like it is linking; however it only does template instantiation and it includes actual compiler functionality for that, so it is closely related to the compiler.
So instead of a compile-and-link build model application developers would have a compile-instantiate-and-link build model.
I just hope for more people to see how export is, and not rejecting it ...
Thank you,
Timothy Madden
Edited by: Madden on Jan 21, 2010 7:31 PM

Web module: exporting keywords to a template not possible?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for