What am i loooking for?

i'm looking to buy a flat screen tv/monitor for my mac mini. i'm planning on using the normal style display lead to connect the mini to the tv/monitor which you would normally use for any normal monitor/crt etc.
what specs am i lookinng for on the tv's specifically? i've seen 'PC input', 'D-Sub' and lots of other things, so much so that i am now confused.
i like this: http://www.play.com/Electronics/Electronics/RGNEC/3-/742342/Samsung32_LE32R41B_HD_Ready_Widescreen_LCDTV/Product.html
and have read good reviews about it too.
any help appreciated.

Hi A Emmerson, on the Samsung website you can look at a quick guide for that LCD TV. This link shows you the back of the TV and its connections.
This link gives you the complete user manual Samsung LE32R41B
As for what specs you should be looking for I'll leave that to those here that would know, since I don't.
Good luck...

Similar Messages

  • What the Initial value for sy-tabix & sy-index

    Hi Folks
       I have a small doubt.
    What the Initial value for sy-tabix & sy-index?
    Can anyone please clarify me?
    Regards,
    Sree

    hi sree,
    both values are initialized to 0 before processing and after processing values are changed according to used scenarios.
    if helpful reward some points.
    with regards,
    suresh babu aluri.

  • What is the Tcodes for Uploading of data using BDC & CATT

    PP members:
    I was going through the <b>cutover activities</b> ,  and what I understood is  we transfer all the legacy system data into SAP before going live
    The data upload follows certain steps (depends on the organizational design load strategies)
    First we upload all the master data ( material master, BOM, W/C's & Routings)
    Then the transaction data ( Ideally speaking, there should no open orders i.e. WIP as on the day of cutoff )
    If the WIP (Work in Process) is unavoidable then the materials consumed shall be treated as <b>materials of the previous stage</b> and necessary adjustments shall be made after cutover day
    At this point, I could not able to understand what does the author mean <b>materials of the previous stage</b>
    Now comming to the uploading of data into SAP from legacy system, we use tools like LSMW, CATT & BDC
    Is it a must to use <b>only LSMW tool</b> to upload master data or any other upload tools are fine
    Lastly,. I am not sure about the Tcode of CATT & BDC
    Summary of the questions:
    1.What does the author mean  <b>material of previous stage</b>, for WIP materials during cutover activities
    2. Is it mandatory to use only LSMW tool for uploading for master data
    3. What are the Tcodes for upload tools CATT & BDC ?
    Thanks for your time
    Suren R

    Dear,
    1.What does the author mean material of previous stage, for WIP materials during cutover activities - as i understood, what is the stage of material..like it must have gone through 2 work centers and other 2 is left. i.e. you need to create Production order with only 2 operation as other 2 is already over. - usually it is done in such a way that we will create Production order and confirm till 2 operations and WIp is calculated so thatb FI will tally the books in SAP and lagacy.
    2. Is it mandatory to use only LSMW tool for uploading for master data - no you can use any tool as required and suits yr requirement
    3. What are the Tcodes for upload tools CATT & BDC- BDC through a prog in SE38. CATT through - SCEM.

  • 1,1 running Lion with XP Boot (re-install and what should i use for recovery disk or usb stick)?

    i am trying to give my 1,1 mac pro a little love and would like to keep this machine running lion. i also have a boot camp installation of XP on it.
    1. can anyone give me instructions on how/whether i can basically do a fresh install of Lion on this machine and minimize the system so it is not cluttered up with all my previous software etc, etc while still maintaining the original XP boot camp partition which i really need to have?
    2. can anyone clarify for me what i should have on hand /if/ i need to boot into recovery mode or some other safe boot mode? i recently ran into an issue where i may have had to use the old Disk Utility format function and there was a reference to booting using the DVD install disks. however i am really confused as to what i should have on hand. ALSO the last time i had to do something on this machine i was told to boot into the Recovery Partition and it appears for some reason (perhaps because i had a "non-standard" windows 7 boot camp installation on the drive at the time??) that there was no recovery partition created when i upgraded to Lion.
    - /anyway/ i am finding that i have the two ORIGINAL install disks for the mac pro on hand, a Max OS X Leopard and a mac OS X Snow Leopard DVD on hand but i am thinking that i should be creating some kind of USB stick similar to the one i created with yosemite? actually, i am not even sure what this USB stick for yosemite is for but i guess i can use it to boot into safe mode or something?
    THANKS for any help as i'd like to get this business under control a little better in case i have an issue.
    i'd also like to install Lion so that there is a Recovery Partition if possible and i think this may be possible if i don't have the windows 7 partition in the machine when i do a fresh install. any help would be great. thanks.

    You have to go out of your way to build the Installer Disk yourself. But this tool makes it easy, and this site contains instructions:
    http://diskmakerx.com
    the bootable installer is basically to re-install the OS if i have to
    Yes.
    the recovery partition is somehow for fixing a problem
    Recovery can go and get you the software and re-download it and start the Install, and allows the use of Disk Utility and can reset passwords.
    or is there some overlap?
    Yes. Both give you access to the Utilities that used to be on the Installer DVD. Disk Utility to Repair or initialize and a few other tools that can allow you to set up to install on an otherwise-bare disk or change your password.
    is "Safe Mode" something completely different
    Safe Mode is a way to start the fully-Installed Operating System in a special way. It first does one pass of Disk Utility (Repair Disk) against the Boot Drive. [Normally this would require booting from a different drive to make repairs.] Then it loads a minimal set of Apple-only kernel extensions, and uses a one-size-fits-all screen resolution. Then it demands your Username and password to proceed.
    From there you can fix settings, use the Finder to add or delete things, and check operation with minimal extensions versus all your daily-use extensions. Very helpful for debugging extension conflicts and graphics settings problems, and fixing damaged settings. The next Restart builds a new extensions cache.

  • My ipod nano 6th gen fell out of my pockey and the screen cracked badly, is there any coverage for this under warranty? I just bought it a month ago. If not what are the options for getting it fixed

    My ipod nano 6th gen fell out of my pocket and the screen cracked badly, is there any coverage for this under warranty? I just bought it a month ago. If not what are the options for getting it fixed? It is pretty frustrating, it fell from about 3 feet out of my pocket and now looks like it was beaten by a hammer.

    Debbie:
    deborahfromwindsor wrote:
    he advises restarting by inserting the OSX disc and pressing down the C button to reboot from there then selecting disk utility, hard disk and repair.... Does he mean me to hold down the C key on the alpha keyboard or the ctrl key?
    Should I just ask for my money back??? If it is a simple repair do I just literally push the disc in, push the power button and hold down the C button?
    That's where I would begin, too, with
    Repair Disk
    Insert Installer disk and Restart, holding down the "C" key until grey Apple appears.
    Go to Installer menu (Panther and earlier) or Utilities menu (Tiger) and launch Disk Utility.
    Select your HDD (manufacturer ID) in the left panel.
    Select First Aid in the Main panel.
    (Check S.M.A.R.TStatus of HDD at the bottom of right panel, and report if it saysanything but Verified)
    Click Repair Disk on the bottom right.
    If DU reports disk does not need repairs quit DU and restart.
    If DU reports errors Repair again and again until DU reports disk is repaired.
    If DU reports errors it cannot repair you will need touse autility like TechTool Pro,Drive Geniusor DiskWarrior
    First we need to determine if the issue you are experiencing with the computer is software or hardware based. Once we have gotten things sorted out there should be time enough to make you decision about keeping or returning it.
    cornelius

  • HT1423 what memory is best for mac

    what memory is best for mac

    crucial.com and macsales.com test RAM for compatibility.  Go to that site, select your system and follow their recommendations.  Both are highly regarded as suppliers for Mac-compatible RAM.

  • All I ask is that I get what I'm PAYING for, please........

    First of all, let me start by saying I'll be very surprised if this actually gets posted.  Took about 10 mins just to get to this point.  Funny how of all sites, Verizon's load the slowest.  You'd think they'd take extra measures to make this a better experience than getting asked over & over to log in after you already did, then it takes minutes (instead of seconds) just to load a page that needs another page that needs another page...
    Here is my deal with Verizon.  I've been a many-years customer of both home phone & DSL.  Up until the last couple months I've had some issues, nothing that couldn't be resolved, but for the last couple months my internet is so slow it's like being back on dialup, ugh..  About 10 days ago I finally got fed up enough to give them a call.
    Something I need to say first, about out-sourcing.  I'm not a fan of it but I understand to an extent why it's being done.  All I ask for though is that when I do talk to someone I can at least understand what they are saying to me.  That's really important to me, I'm sure it's important to you as well.  When I say "you people" I mean Verizon people, I'm not referring to anyone's race, color, etc., etc.,...
    OK...so I call them up & 1st guy is "DJ" he said that was what to call him since after 3 tries I still couldn't pronounce his name correctly.  I could understand him for the most part & I really do believe he tried his best to help me with my problem.  I was on the phone with DJ for I dunno, an hour, maybe hour & 1/2. 
    Looking back on it, I don't think he was the best informed person, I don't think any of them were.  We talked & I let him access not only my 2 yr old desktop but my precious not even 5 month old laptop.  We tried this, this, that, that.....it was just a big run around IMO.  DJ dumped my temp internet files, cookies, blah blah blah.......same on laptop.  Finally, after all the time on the phone he did exactly what I knew would happen.  He opened up my gateway page & said "see where it says you're getting this speed, etc?  That's what you're getting."   I don't care what that page says, I'm not getting what I'm paying for! 
    Due to the crappy service I've been getting I do speed tests daily & do them several times per day.  I use speedtest.net & also internetfrog.com as well as a couple others if I need them.  What amazes me is that after running me around on the phone for well over an hour, they wind up opening my gate page & then blame me, my 2 computers, my ability to see there's a real problem here.  I was asked to subscribe to a "professional tech service" of some sorts at $14.99 a month & was then told that's all that could be done for me.  I was then transferred to the so-called supervisor who was nothing short of RUDE, I was happy to finally end my call.  The next day a woman called, I could barely understand a word she was saying so I told her I wasn't up to talking & hung up.
    Call me **bleep**  but I decided to "upgrade" my service.  It said for 6 months I'd get a $10 rate reduction (which is cheaper than my current pkg) and I figured I'd at the very least, get better than what I was getting for only a few bucks more.  WRONG!!  They kicked in my new "better" pkg last night.  I do get better speed test results but only at "non-peak" times & even then, they are sketchy. 
    I haven't done a ton of reading as of yet but so far my impression is they're over loading the hubs in my area, too bad for me.  My speed tests are no better now than what they were before I "upgraded" my service.  A good example is this...it took 25 mins to download a 20 mb file...tried on both computers & it was the same for each of them.  If I had just one computer then sure, maybe I'd blame it on that.  I have a 2 yr old desktop with XP that has never given me any problems, I do my scans & keep things running smooth.  My laptop has W7 & isn't even  5 months old.  You can't tell me that both are simply "screwed up" and need professional help when I know **bleep** well it's not on my part but is on Verizon's! 
    I am stuck with Verizon due to where I live, what options are actually available at this time.  All I am asking for is that I am given what I'm paying for, what they say they're willing to provide.  I do not appreciate all the running around, the bad accents with less than understand spoken words of what they consider to be "english"....I can't understand wtf they're saying to me!  So frustrating, it really is. *sigh*
    Sorry for the rambling but if you've read this far I think you're in the same boat I am.  They used to be a company I truly did admire, now I'm just wondering how to dump them.  I'm very sad about this, I can't count on Verizon any longer to be reliable & more important...that they care other than me paying my bill.  ~Laurie

    LauriesWorld wrote:
    First of all, let me start by saying I'll be very surprised if this actually gets posted.  Took about 10 mins just to get to this point.  Funny how of all sites, Verizon's load the slowest.  You'd think they'd take extra measures to make this a better experience than getting asked over & over to log in after you already did, then it takes minutes (instead of seconds) just to load a page that needs another page that needs another page...
    Here is my deal with Verizon.  I've been a many-years customer of both home phone & DSL.  Up until the last couple months I've had some issues, nothing that couldn't be resolved, but for the last couple months my internet is so slow it's like being back on dialup, ugh..  About 10 days ago I finally got fed up enough to give them a call.
    Something I need to say first, about out-sourcing.  I'm not a fan of it but I understand to an extent why it's being done.  All I ask for though is that when I do talk to someone I can at least understand what they are saying to me.  That's really important to me, I'm sure it's important to you as well.  When I say "you people" I mean Verizon people, I'm not referring to anyone's race, color, etc., etc.,...
    OK...so I call them up & 1st guy is "DJ" he said that was what to call him since after 3 tries I still couldn't pronounce his name correctly.  I could understand him for the most part & I really do believe he tried his best to help me with my problem.  I was on the phone with DJ for I dunno, an hour, maybe hour & 1/2. 
    Looking back on it, I don't think he was the best informed person, I don't think any of them were.  We talked & I let him access not only my 2 yr old desktop but my precious not even 5 month old laptop.  We tried this, this, that, that.....it was just a big run around IMO.  DJ dumped my temp internet files, cookies, blah blah blah.......same on laptop.  Finally, after all the time on the phone he did exactly what I knew would happen.  He opened up my gateway page & said "see where it says you're getting this speed, etc?  That's what you're getting."   I don't care what that page says, I'm not getting what I'm paying for! 
    Due to the crappy service I've been getting I do speed tests daily & do them several times per day.  I use speedtest.net & also internetfrog.com as well as a couple others if I need them.  What amazes me is that after running me around on the phone for well over an hour, they wind up opening my gate page & then blame me, my 2 computers, my ability to see there's a real problem here.  I was asked to subscribe to a "professional tech service" of some sorts at $14.99 a month & was then told that's all that could be done for me.  I was then transferred to the so-called supervisor who was nothing short of RUDE, I was happy to finally end my call.  The next day a woman called, I could barely understand a word she was saying so I told her I wasn't up to talking & hung up.
    Call me **bleep**  but I decided to "upgrade" my service.  It said for 6 months I'd get a $10 rate reduction (which is cheaper than my current pkg) and I figured I'd at the very least, get better than what I was getting for only a few bucks more.  WRONG!!  They kicked in my new "better" pkg last night.  I do get better speed test results but only at "non-peak" times & even then, they are sketchy. 
    I haven't done a ton of reading as of yet but so far my impression is they're over loading the hubs in my area, too bad for me.  My speed tests are no better now than what they were before I "upgraded" my service.  A good example is this...it took 25 mins to download a 20 mb file...tried on both computers & it was the same for each of them.  If I had just one computer then sure, maybe I'd blame it on that.  I have a 2 yr old desktop with XP that has never given me any problems, I do my scans & keep things running smooth.  My laptop has W7 & isn't even  5 months old.  You can't tell me that both are simply "screwed up" and need professional help when I know **bleep** well it's not on my part but is on Verizon's! 
    I am stuck with Verizon due to where I live, what options are actually available at this time.  All I am asking for is that I am given what I'm paying for, what they say they're willing to provide.  I do not appreciate all the running around, the bad accents with less than understand spoken words of what they consider to be "english"....I can't understand wtf they're saying to me!  So frustrating, it really is. *sigh*
    Sorry for the rambling but if you've read this far I think you're in the same boat I am.  They used to be a company I truly did admire, now I'm just wondering how to dump them.  I'm very sad about this, I can't count on Verizon any longer to be reliable & more important...that they care other than me paying my bill.  ~Laurie
    I could have written this EXACT same message - down tot he "upgrading my service" for less money than I was currently paying, I figured, it couldn't hurt, right?
    wrong
    The CS guy told me that my wirespeed modem was still "the best they had"  (which is a joke as I don't even think they offer this anymore.  
    At least now, I am paying for 1.5mbps and I'm not getting it.  They WILL refund this money every month until I get something.  I'm simply not going to pay it anymore.  

  • Centre button is not working properly in my iphone . . what can i do for that ?

    centre button is not working properly in my iphone . . what can i do for that ?

    Get it serviced.

  • What is the query for Accounts Payable Trial Balance (APXTRBAL) in 11.5.10?

    Hi Guys,
    What is the query for Accounts Payable Trial Balance (APXTRBAL) in 11.5.10?
    I have to write an AP Invoice Aging Report in Discoverer to show all unpaid invoices that have been transferred into GL... Business wants it to match one-to-one with the AP Trial Balance standard report...
    Business wants to run the report for any date in a past...
    The report has two parameters:
    As Of Date - the same as As of Date for the AP Trial Report
    Trial Balance Run Date - the date when Trial Balance was run...
    Conditions are:
    TRUNC(Invoice Date) <=TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:As Of Date),SYSDATE))
    TRUNC(NVL(Payment Date,'01-JAN-5000')) > TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:As Of Date),SYSDATE))
    TRUNC(Invoice Creation Date) <= TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:Trial Balance Run Date),SYSDATE))
    Distr Accounting Date <= TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:As Of Date),SYSDATE))
    NVL(Distr Creation Date,Invoice Creation Date) <= TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:Trial Balance Run Date),SYSDATE))
    Show_Flag = 'YES', where:
    Show_Flag = CASE WHEN ( NVL(Cancelled Date,'01-JAN-1901') > NVL(:As Of Date,SYSDATE) AND NVL(Inv Amount Aud,0) = 0 ) THEN 'YES' ELSE ( CASE WHEN NVL(Inv Amount Aud,0) = 0 THEN 'NO' ELSE 'YES' END ) END
    There is a difference between the logic of my report, and the logic of AP Trial Balance...
    Could you please advise what I'm missing?
    Thanks,
    Iana

    What is the query for Accounts Payable Trial Balance (APXTRBAL) in 11.5.10? You can get the code by opening the report in Reports Builder and get the query.
    Or, enable trace/debug as per (FAQ: Common Tracing Techniques within the Oracle Applications 11i/R12 [ID 296559.1]).
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • TS3297 "iTunes was unable to load data class information from Sync Services." What is this solution for the new phone to sync up with my iTunes acct?

    "iTunes was unable to load data class information from Sync Services." What is this solution for this new phone to sync up with my iTunes acct?

    Hi tadhunt,
    Here is an article that directly addresses that error message:
    iTunes for Windows: "Unable to load data class" or "Unable to load provider data" sync services alert
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts2690
    I hope this helps!
    - Ari

  • What is the logic for the behavior of LV9 when opening vi references?

    I recently started using LV 9 and I can't figure out what the rationale is for the LV 9 behavior when opening references to vis. The way I understand it, LV9 looks up vis using the absolute path on the disk where they came from when opening references, even if they are in memory. If just a vi name is given, LV9 tacks on the path of the referring vi on disk when trying to open the reference. So, as far as I can see, either an application opening references to vis needs to specify absolute paths to the location on disk and be modified whenever a dynamically called vi's location on disk is changed, or a dynamically called vi has to be saved in the same directory as the vi doing the calling or in a rigid and inflexible directory structure.  
    Example:
    I am trying to use a 3rd party library whose vis open a reference to a vi that I create, the name of which is obtained from those in memory using a name pattern. The library vis get the name of the vi I created and try to open a reference to it. Previously this worked because LV looked in memory for "my.vi" when opening the reference but this fails with LV9 because it apparently looks for, e.g., "D:\VI\3rdparty.llb\my.vi", not "my.vi". So, as far as I can see, I have to save my.vi in 3rdparty.llb in order to use it. And, if I want to use 3rdparty.llb in another application, I have to save other vis to 3rdparty.llb or create a new copy elsewhere and save to that copy for the new application. A similar situation would occur if I passed the name of my vi to the 3rdparty.llb vis - either I would need to pass an absolute path and modify my application if I ever want to move my.vi, or save it in 3rdparty.llb.
    Another example:
    I have a large application built into an executable that calls up to ca. 60 vis  using references.  Previously I could just specify the path to the executable, and I could easily open references to my vis. Now  (if I try to use the LV 9 file structure), I can't figure out the paths I need to open references. Either I have to specify the absolute path to the original location in my development directories, or I have to store all my source vis in some particular directory structure. If I want to reuse my vis in other applications (which I do) things would get pretty complicated. Likewise if I want to optionally open references in other vis than my top level vi (which I do), it seems well nigh impossible.
    Basically I am struggling with the concept that an application remembers the directory structure where the source files were located, and/or depends on a particular directory structure of the source files to work. Maybe I'm missing some tricks that would make things easier, but someone will have to explain to me why these are good things. 

    I appreciate the responses and explanations. I've certainly learned
    some things. I have extensive experience using LV but over a fairly
    narrow set of
    applications so I'm certainly not aware of many of the possible
    techniques.  I clearly don't use LV in the same way as what appears to
    be the mainstream for LV programmers.
    I have some additional
    comments on the various responses:
    "But
    with VI libraries and LVOOP this had the problem that multiple VIs could
    end up with the same name..."
    I'm not clear what this means exactly. My first response would be
    that it doesn't seem like a good idea in general to use different
    portions of code with the same name in a single application. I'm
    surprised this is even possible.  I don't think LV will even let me
    build from a project in which it finds name conflicts for vis.  
    "In addition to what Rolf wrote, it should be
    pointed out that LV should NOT be looking for files if you built your
    app correctly. Each VI maintains a relative path to all VI it calls and
    it should know exactly where to find them (assuming they're there).
    I think this illustrates one thing I was talking about. The
    assumption appears to be that the organization of your source files is
    an essential ingredient in the application that is built, which is a
    foreign concept to me. My project file knows where all my vis are, the
    applications build correctly, and, using the 8.x and previous file
    structure for my exe, they work, and have for some time.  As far as I'm
    concerned the main point of using a project that identifies my source
    files is to be able to pull in code from different places - if I want to
    use a different version of one of my dynamically called subvis, from a
    different location, for example, I tell the project file to use the new
    version and rebuild.  In your scenario, as I understand it, I'm not sure
    why a project file in which you identify source files is even needed, 
    if LV already knows everything about the components of the application
    you're building.  As I mentioned, my primary application uses ca. 60
    dynamically called vis. Most of these control different subsystems of a
    large distributed hardware control and data acquisition system. All of
    these are used sometimes when the application is used, but pretty much
    never all of them at once - typically something like 10-30 of the
    user-interactive vis are run at once. There is some communication
    between them using globals, queues, and semaphores and such, but for the
    most part they are independent and I test them separately. Until the
    application is built and used, there is no need to run the entire
    application  including all subvis, and I never do it. When I build my
    application, the app builder finds all the vis I specify and constructs
    the exe file including all the vis I've told it about. Before LV 9 it
    never occurred to me that I might actually have to worry about being
    able to find vis inside the executable. 
    "However as tst has mentioned having an
    executable search for VIs is a VERY VERY bad idea as it can break your
    entire app if it happens to find the wrong VI at some point."
     I don't really follow this point at all. Where are these vis
    masquerading as the ones I want that will break my application? The only
    vis on the machines where my applications are used are there because I
    put them there inside the executables. I certainly would never use
    different vis with the same name in an application - as I said above, I
    don't even know if it is possible, and don't want to find out.  Search
    paths to find components like shared libraries are a common thing. It
    doesn 't seem like a stretch for the run-time environment to define a
    default search path like "somewhere in the exe file containing the
    application".
    I don't want to make a mountain out of a mole hill here, as I said
    before, I am happy as long as NI supports the 8.x file structure, but if
    nothing else I have definitely learned to appreciate how different
    executables built w/ labview are from executables  constructed in other
    systems. 

  • I have just getting a new phone and I have forgot my password an Apple ID what I made new for the new phone now I cannot get on it because asking for id and password what should I do help plz thank u

    I have just getting a new phone and I have forgot my password an Apple ID what I made new for the new phone now I cannot get on it because asking for id and password what should I do help plz thank u

    Try
    https://iforgot.apple.com

  • HT4437 hi even when i connect my macbook and apple tv to the same wifi network i cant put on the air play mirroring option.my airplay mirroring option does not detect any device.what can i do for this?

    hi even when i connect my macbook and apple tv to the same wifi network i cant put on the air play mirroring option.my airplay mirroring option does not detect any device.what can i do for this?

    See
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4215

  • What is the number for Verizon Wireless  Corporate Customer Service Complaint for CA

    My Complaint:  I have been a Verizon Wireless customer for approx 20 years.  I called customer service to seek an early upgrade for my daughter's phone. She is away in college and her phone is malfunctioning.  She is eligible for an upgrade in approx 6 weeks so I did not want to spend the money on a replacement phone when since we were planning on updating to something newer.  The customer service rep to me they could not do the early upgrade an to call back in a few weeks. After explaining this was unacceptable (I do not like the idea of a young female being out of state and away from home with no reliable means of communication), she places me on hold to later return with the only offer of  I must purchase a new device through her ( over the phone) which will be shipped to me, the phone was priced $100.00 more than the online price (they will not price match), plus i must pay $30.00 upgrade fee, $35.00 activation fee and taxes on the retail price of the phone.  I am upset and disappointed with the quality of service provided by Verizon being a 20 year customer.  If not for the seriousness and urgency of this matter, i would not have asked for an early upgrade.  It is times such as these that you get to see how much of a "valued customer" you really are.   I guess you are valued as long as you pay your bill and continually  purchase their products.  I would like to speak with someone from Verizon's corporate or customer relations department.  As of now I am really considering changing my service to a different provider.  I have multiple accounts with Verizon and i will canx each after the current contract committment expire (starting with my daughter's phone which expires in 6 weeks) In the meantime I will go purchase her a new phone with someone else and take comfort knowing she will have reliable communication.

    I started with them in 1985. It has been wonderful service but very expensive. They seem to operate on day of deposit day of withdrawal. That means that I have no benefits nothing beyond the normal customer if I don't pay my bill they shut me off. That's why I have switch to another provider and I have better service lower cost and better phones. you can't beat  other providers I mean it. Please don't expect more from verizon other than a "pay me more money and I'll do what you want" because it's all about money. Read the transcripts from current Verizon employees all over the internet. The company is going down and they're taking customers with them.
    msvat <[email protected]> wrote:
    msvat  created the discussion
    "What is the number for Verizon Wireless  Corporate Customer Service Complaint for CA"
    To view the discussion, visit: https://community.verizonwireless.com/message/1113982#1113982
    >

  • I purchased extra Icloud storage on my IPhone for £14 but have been charged an additional £1.58p where can I find out what this charge was for?

    I purchased extra Icloud storage on my IPhone for £14 but have been charged an additional £1.58p where can I find out what this charge was for?

    Sign in, activation, or connection errors | CS5.5 and later
    For your payment issues you will have to contact ales support.
    Mylenium

Maybe you are looking for