What is better and fast to use between decode and case

Hi friends,
i wanted to know what is better to use decode or case in sql,which gives faster result.
thks
sonal....

Here's a very simple timing comparison. This table (actually it's a partition) has a little over 1 million rows.
As you can see, the timing difference is trivial. (I ran an earlier query to fetch the blocks from disk).
SQL> select sum(decode(balloon_flag
  2                   ,'Y',1
  3                   ,0
  4                   )
  5            ) bal_count
  6  from   prod.loan_master
  7  where  report_date = to_date('31-DEC-2005');
           BAL_COUNT
                9036
Elapsed: 00:00:07.65
SQL> select sum(case balloon_flag
  2                  when 'Y' then 1
  3                  else  0
  4             end
  5            ) bal_count
  6  from   prod.loan_master
  7  where  report_date = to_date('31-DEC-2005');
           BAL_COUNT
                9036
Elapsed: 00:00:07.68
SQL> select sum(case
  2                  when balloon_flag = 'Y' then 1
  3                  else  0
  4             end
  5            ) bal_count
  6  from   prod.loan_master
  7  where  report_date = to_date('31-DEC-2005');
           BAL_COUNT
                9036
Elapsed: 00:00:07.46

Similar Messages

  • What screen protector and case will you be buying for your new ipad (3rd generation)?

    Hello!
    I'd like to know what types of cases people will be buying for their new ipad this coming Friday as well as what type of screen protector/body guard you'd recommend. 
    I've been looking online trying to find places that would be able to ship before Friday, but I'm not sure which one to go with, there's too many options!  I'm definitely interested in a leather folio case though.
    I've also been wondering what type of screen protector to put on.  I've seen the iVisor anti-glare, and I really like how it works, but seriously... anti-glare on a retina display?  I don't know... any thoughts on that or suggestions?  I'd greatly appreciate it!!
    Thanks!

    I had an anti-glare screen protector on my iPad 2 and it degraded the quality of the screen so much I removed it. I have a clear skin on the back, which I like. It prevents scratches to the aluminum back and provides a gripping surface to hold on to. The iPad itself was slippery so that extra grip factor helps me. I use a smart cover for the front, because I like the features it has and the quick removability when docking the iPad. I also like that it automatically sleeps and wakes the iPad thereby conserving power. I chose the polyurethane smart cover because I had heard many issues with the leather covers fading/losing color and I couldn't justify the $30.00 dollar difference in price. I dock my iPad into an iHome theater device regularly, so using a portfolio type case would be too cumbersome to deal with. I do think portfolio cases or the otter box cases provide more protection, but they add more bulk to the iPad than I care to deal with. In the end it comes down to personal preference based on your particular needs. The items I have listed and the reasons for them fit my needs, I'm sure others will have different configurations that are specific to their needs. Hope this helps,
    Bob

  • Session vs. Beans, what is better and why?

    A question of principal: Is there any reason why it is always adviced to use beans (user beans, value beans etc.) if I can get the same results with sessionAttributes? I see one disadvantage of sessionAttributes; they can only store Objects, so you need wrapper for ints, booleans etc., but it seems easyer to write:
    String xxx = session.getAttribute("xxx").toString(); or
    session.setAttribute("xxx", xxx);
    than writing a bean with a getxxxString() and setxxxString()method, compiling it and set the useBean tag scope="session" etc...
    Is there any advantage in performance, storage use or security?
    I have to excuse, if this topic has been discussed before, I couldn't find it...

    Here is an interesting test done on this topic...
    http://www.sys-con.com/weblogic/articleprint.cfm?id=101

  • What's better than Illustrator?

    I've been using Illustrator for many years and several versions.  My usage is nominal and occasional/once a week, and I don't get very sophisticated for my needs, so it has been OK so far. I do not do commercial work but know Ai is the "de-facto std".
    But I read this forum often and see many criticisms of Ai and I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
    I see JET and others here make great use of Illy but also criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
    I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things.
    So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?  Is it worth having a second program and learning (tho I suspect the learning curve should be easy as they do similar things but have different GUI).  Or replacing Illy with something?
    Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?  I don't even know what out there is better than Illy.  I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
    Am I wasting my time looking?
    Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.

    I see JET and others here...criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
    I can't speak for "and others", but since I'm the only one you mention by name:
    If you've already deemed the criticism justifiable, then you must already know what that criticism says. When I criticize Illustrator, I don't just say "Illustrator is crap" and leave it at that, unsupported. I'm careful to explain myself with facts pertinent to the context of the discussion. I actually own and know how to use the other programs to which I compare. I've often posted lists of comparitive features.
    I've always used my real name here and sign all my posts with my initials. So finding my comments is not difficult.
    I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things. So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?
    Didn't you just answer your own question? Other than the broadly general things you just mentioned, what program do you want to compare, and for doing what? Surely you're not asking someone to do an exhaustive feature-by-feature comparison between Illustrator and all similar programs in this one thread?
    All you've said about what you use Illustrator for is that your use is nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical. Mine isn't. Commerical graphics has been my livelihood for over 40 years. Vector-based illustration is both a speciality and a passion.
    I...knowAi is the "de-facto std"
    "Defacto standard" is self-fulfilling. It's effectively equivalent to saying "More people use Illustrator because more people use Illustrator."
    So what? More people ride Vespa scooters than KTM motorcycles. But which one would you call "professional quality"? You can use either one to pick up a gallon of orange juice at the corner store. But if you enter an enduro, the KTM will get the job done with alot less stress.
    The myth is that most software buyers choose the best. That's as naive as the faith that most voters do.
    Illustrator has been slothfully resting on its "defacto standard" haunches since the dark ages (AKA the 80s). "Defacto standard" be hanged.
    I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
    Okay. What issues? State something specific and users actually familiar with other programs can compare.
    This is the 21st century. There's really little new under the sun here. A 2D drawing program is just an interface pasted on top of mostly the same old geometric functionality. The competitive advantage goes to the offering that best (easy) and most fully (robust) empowers the user. The multiplication of easy and robust yields elegance. That's a term I've never applied to Illustrator. Illustrator is one of the oldest of the bunch, lounging under the sun for so long it's at risk of skin cancer. Yet it still fails to provide basic functionality users of other drawing programs have taken for granted for decades.
    Examples that may be germane to your casual, non-commerical use? Try these things in Illustrator:
    Star Tool: Draw a star. Now change the number of points it has.
    Arc Tool: Draw 36 degrees of a circular arc.
    Label that star with a dimension.
    Distribute a group of different objects along a curve.
    Uniformly space Blend steps along a non-uniform curve.
    Attach a Blend to a closed path and have the first/last instances properly positioned.
    Knife Tool: Cut across an open unfilled path.
    Connect a text label to an object that stays connected when you move it.
    Paste a simple graphic into a text string so that it flows with the text.
    Perform a Find/Replace on carriage returns.
    Round Corners: Apply it to an accute or obtuse angle and have it actually yield the radius you specify.
    Crop a raster image.
    Rotate something. Go back later and find out what its rotation angle is.
    Pathfinders: Use them without wrecking existing fills/strokes.
    I could go on (and have). How long a list do you want? All the features/functions associated with the above basic operations (and many more) are substandard, half-baked, or even non-existent in Illustrator. This is "professional"-grade software? No, it's largely consumerish rubbish sold at exhorbitant prices just because it's the "defacto standard."
    Is it worth having a second program and learning...
    Obviously, it is to me (and a third, and a fourth, and...). As I've said many times in this forum, I don't know how anyone can legitimately claim to compare two programs if they've only got workaday familiarity with one.
    As with any other endeavor, the more drawing programs you're comfortable with, the less arduous it is to pick up another, because you tend to pick up on the underlying principles involved, as opposed to just becomming habituated to a particular program's command locations and procedures by rote.
    But you've been using AI for "many years" and find it to be "OK". So if you're happy with it, use it.
    I have a cheap, consumerish Ryobi table saw and it's "OK." But I didn't pay a professional-grade price for it, either. And I'm sure not going to write glorious reviews on it, call it "professional," and get all fearfully brand-loyal defensive about it if someone dares suggest I might ought to learn to use a different one. My use of it, like yours, is merely occasional. But I also presently need to build a TV cabinet, and I'm dreading it. If I were to open a cabinet shop, I'd be much more discriminating, and would do my own homework to make an informed decision.
    Or replacing Illy with something?
    One doesn't have to "replace." There's nothing any more wrong with using more than one 2D drawing program than there is with using more than one 3D modeling program, or raster imaging program, or page layout program, or word processor, or video edting program, or....
    Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?
    That depends on what one is doing with it. Not knowing that, I can again only offer generalities that matter to me: If you've only ever used one program of a particulat kind, you're rather in the dark regarding functionality that you may be missing that may be important to you. (Second-degree ignorance: You don't know what you don't know.) If you're mission-dependent upon that one program, you're also kind of captive to the whims and agenda of its vendor.
    That very well may not matter to you, given your nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical use. And if so, that's fine.
    I don't even know what out there is better than Illy. I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
    But you just said you've been reading a bunch of posts here which mention other programs.
    Am I wasting my time looking?
    Only you can answer that about your time. Time is all any of us have.
    Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.
    No offense, but frankly it sounds like you're just not motivated enough to do your own homework. If you are  sufficiently motivated, visit the websites of other drawing program vendors. Read the features lists. Dowload the demos, read the documentation, and try them out. Visit the programs' user forums. Or, if it's really not that important to you, don't.
    If you've got questions about specific functionality and/or specific programs, be more specific about what you do (or want to do).
    JET

  • Use of decode/case statements

    I am trying to use a decode or case statement to check for a particular field code of 'SIP' and if that is the value I only want half of the production figure used in the calculations for that field ('SIP').
    The following code works well without the items commented out:
    SELECT ALL
    FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.END_TIME as prod_date,
    'SCD' as district,
    --decode(FINDER_WIS.FACILITY_FIELD_X.FIELD_CODE,'SIP',FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.VOLUME/2,FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA) AS TEST_SIP,
    /*case when FINDER_WIS.FACILITY_FIELD_X.FIELD_CODE = 'SIP'
         then FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.VOLUME/2
              else FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.VOLUME
    end as fieldtest,*/
    round(SUM(NVL(FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.VOLUME,0))) as total_oil,
    ROUND(SUM(NVL(FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.VOLUME,0)) / TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.END_TIME,'DD'))) AS BOPD
    FROM FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR,
    FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA,
    FINDER_WIS.FACILITY,
    FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP,
    FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL,
    FINDER_WIS.FACILITY_FIELD_X,
    SELECT distinct FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.FACILITY_S
    FROM FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR,
    FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA,
    FINDER_WIS.FACILITY,
    FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP,
    FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL
    WHERE (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.ACTIVITY_TYPE = 'ALLOCATED'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.TIME_PERIOD_TYPE = 'MONTH'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.STATE_TYPE = 'STANDARD'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.EXISTENCE_TYPE = 'ACTUAL'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.MATERIAL_TYPE='OIL'
    and FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP.REPORTING_GROUP_TYPE = 'ASSET_TEAM'
    AND FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP.REPORTING_GROUP_ID ='SCD'
    and finder_wis.production_HDR.SOURCE = 'NEWWIS'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.START_TIME BETWEEN :startdate_var AND :enddate_var)
    AND ((FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.PRODUCTION_HDR_S=FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.PRODUCTION_HDR_S)
    and (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.FACILITY_S = FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.FACILITY_S)
    and (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.START_TIME between FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.start_time and nvl(FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.end_time,'01-JAN-2010')
    or FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.end_TIME between FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.start_time and nvl(FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.end_time,'01-JAN-2010'))
    AND (FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP.REPORTING_GROUP_S = FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.REPORTING_GROUP_S)
    AND (FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.FACILITY_S = FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.FACILITY_S)))T
    WHERE (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.ACTIVITY_TYPE = 'ALLOCATED'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.TIME_PERIOD_TYPE = 'MONTH'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.STATE_TYPE = 'STANDARD'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.EXISTENCE_TYPE = 'ACTUAL'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.MATERIAL_TYPE='OIL'
    and FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP.REPORTING_GROUP_TYPE = 'ASSET_TEAM'
    and finder_wis.production_HDR.SOURCE = 'NEWWIS'
    AND FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.START_TIME BETWEEN :startdate_var AND :enddate_var)
    AND ((FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.FACILITY_S = T.FACILITY_S)
    AND (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_DATA.PRODUCTION_HDR_S=FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.PRODUCTION_HDR_S)
    AND FINDER_WIS.FACILITY_FIELD_X.UWI = FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.UWI
    AND FINDER_WIS.FACILITY_FIELD_X.FIELD_CODE NOT IN ('MW','BRM','PLG','SIP')
    and (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.FACILITY_S = FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.FACILITY_S)
    and (FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.START_TIME between FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.start_time and nvl(FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.end_time,'01-JAN-2010')
    or FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.end_TIME between FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.start_time and nvl(FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.end_time,'01-JAN-2010'))
    AND (FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP.REPORTING_GROUP_S = FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.REPORTING_GROUP_S)
    AND (FINDER_WIS.FACILITY.FACILITY_S = FINDER_WIS.REPORTING_GROUP_DETAIL.FACILITY_S))
    GROUP BY FINDER_WIS.PRODUCTION_HDR.END_TIME
    the results look like this but this is without the values for the 'SIP' field:
    PROD_DATE     DISTRICT     TOTAL_OIL BOPD
    31/10/2007     SCD     168009     5420
    30/11/2007     SCD     167339     5578
    31/12/2007     SCD     170277     5493
    31/01/2008     SCD     173677     5602
    29/02/2008     SCD     168498     5810
    31/03/2008     SCD     172689     5571
    30/04/2008     SCD     168180     5606
    31/05/2008     SCD     165448     5337
    30/06/2008     SCD     164631     5488
    31/07/2008     SCD     170073     5486
    31/08/2008     SCD     166520     5372
    30/09/2008     SCD     160321     5344
    When I try to add the decode or case statement, I get ORA-00979; not a Group By expression as the error.
    Can anyone assist me with this please?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi and welcome to the forum.
    Simply put the field names you use in your DECODE also in your GROUP BY and it should work:
    simple example:
    MHO%xe> with t as (
      2  select 1 col1, 1 col2 from dual union all
      3  select 1 col1, 1 col2 from dual union all
      4  select 2 col1, 2 col2 from dual union all
      5  select 3 col1, 3 col2 from dual union all
      6  select 4 col1, 4 col2 from dual
      7  )
      8  select col1
      9  ,      decode(col1, 1, col2*100, col2)
    10  ,      sum(col2)
    11  from   t
    12  group by col1 -->> NO col2 here...
    13  order by col1;
    ,      decode(col1, 1, col2*100, col2)
    FOUT in regel 9:
    .ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
    Verstreken: 00:00:05.78
    MHO%xe> with t as (
      2  select 1 col1, 1 col2 from dual union all
      3  select 1 col1, 1 col2 from dual union all
      4  select 2 col1, 2 col2 from dual union all
      5  select 3 col1, 3 col2 from dual union all
      6  select 4 col1, 4 col2 from dual
      7  )
      8  select col1
      9  ,      decode(col1, 1, col2*100, col2)
    10  ,      sum(col2)
    11  from   t
    12  group by col1, col2
    13  order by col1;
          COL1 DECODE(COL1,1,COL2*100,COL2)  SUM(COL2)
             1                          100          2
             2                            2          2
             3                            3          3
             4                            4          4

  • I have a Mac pro(1 free bay) and a mac mini I need to back both of them  Is it better to use an external NAS HD or an internal hard drive on my mac pro (mid 2010) What option has the faster GB/s?

    I have a Mac pro(1 free bay) and a mac mini I need to back up both of them (time machine)  Is it better to use an external NAS HD or an internal hard drive on my mac pro (mid 2010)
    What option has the faster GB/s?

    Disk drive using native SATA bus interface will allow the drive to copy and always present and ready.
    But once you have backup any hourly changes should be smaller and as long as the NAS and your switch should allow enough.
    You should always have off line backups and don't rely on just one backup set or just TimeMachine.
    WD RED models are designed for RAID and NAS and 7.2k instead of your more standard slower green 5400 rpm green models while still costing less than WD Blacks.
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008JJLW4M/
    How to clone your system:
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone-backup.html
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone.html
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
    Using Cloning as a Backup Strategy
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
    http://www.bombich.com/software/updates/ccc-3.5.html
    Clone to internal, TimeMachine to NAS is one way to go at it.

  • I have a limited budget so between 5s 16b and 5c 32b what is better?

    i have a limited budget so between 5s 16b and 5c 32b what is better? My use is largely for photos, videos and songs. I do not store any movies on the phone.

    The A7 chip is more powerful then the A6. It is also has a 64 bit processor in it. Big advantages not really is slightly faster when you do the same things on both the 5S and 5C.
    For the needs you stated and since you said you are on a budget, I suggested the 5C.
    Allan

  • What is the use of t-rfc in ALE? compared to t-rfc, Qrfc is better and effi

    what is the use of t-rfc in ALE? compared to t-rfc, Qrfc is better and efficient?

    Hi Sunil,
    These are the types of RFC
    Asynchronous RFC (aRFC)
    Synchronous RFC (sRFC)
    Transactional RFC (tRFC)
    Queued RFC (qRFC)
    Parallel RFC (pRFC)
    Asynchronous RFC :
    This is used when you need to increase the performance of ABAP program by having system call more than one function module in parallel than forcing the program to wait for results .
    Transactional RFC
    This let you group one or more function module call together o tRFC LUW and ensure that fucnction module within LUW is called once . In contrast to aRFC and sRFC the tRFC belonging to tRFC LUW are executed in order .
    tRFC is always used if a function is executed as a Logical Unit of Work (LUW). Within a LUW, all calls are
    1.Executed in the order in which they are called
    2.Executed in the same program context in the target system
    3.Run as a single transaction: they are either committed or rolled back as a unit.
    Implementation of tRFC is recommended if you want to guarantee that the transactional order of the calls is preserved
    Asynchronous remote function calls (aRFCs) are similar to transactional RFCs, in that the user does not have to wait for their completion before continuing the calling dialog. There are three characteristics, however, that distinguish asynchronous RFCs from transactional RFCs:
    • When the caller starts an asynchronous RFC, the called server must be available to accept the request.
    The parameters of asynchronous RFCs are not logged to the database, but sent directly to the server.
    • Asynchronous RFCs allow the user to carry on an interactive dialog with the remote system.
    • The calling program can receive results from the asynchronous RFC.
    You can use asynchronous remote function calls whenever you need to establish communication with a remote system, but do not want to wait for the function’s result before continuing processing. Asynchronous RFCs can also be sent to the same system. In this case, the system opens a new session (or window). You can then switch back and for between the calling dialog and the called session
    RECEIVE RESULTS FROM FUNCTION Remotefunction is used within a FORM routine to receive the results of an asynchronous remote function call. The following receiving parameters are available:
    IMPORTING
    TABLES
    EXCEPTIONS
    The addition KEEPING TASK prevents an asynchronous connection from being closed after receiving the results of the processing. The relevant remote context (roll area) is kept for re-use until the caller terminates the connection.
    Hope this resolves your query.
    Reward all the helpful answers.
    Regards

  • What is better to use and why?

    Hi,
    What is better to use and why?
    We have written follwing statements to check the existence of interested record in table.
    1).
    select count(*) from emp where deptno = 20;
    2).
    select 'X'
    from dual
    where exists (
    select 'X' from emp
    where deptno = 20);
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rushang Kansara

    Assuming a large table, number two would be the fastest. If empno in unique, you can leave out the where exists part and just select x from emp where empno = 20. If empno is not unique, then using where exists can be faster. Assuming that empno is not unique, query 1 may elect to scan the whole table looking for that empno. Number 2 can use the index and return your result in, typically, three LIOs.
    Again, it all depends on your indexing, size of tables, and uniqueness of key upon which you are searching.

  • What should I use  between JSE and JEE?

    Is it true that JSE can do only certain level, but JEE can do the same with JSE and specially beyound of JSE.? If i want to develop a web application, what should i install to my computer between JSE and JEE or i have to install its both?

    hi
    you dont get all the features of j2se when you have j2ee with you. they are 2 different things.
    j2ee mostly deals with things which are required for a enterprise application building which include EJBs, Servlets, JSPs etc. while the J2SE is more useful for application developement (using Swing e.g). this is only a crude differentiation.
    the choice betweeen the two depends on your requirement. e.g. if you are developing a web application, you will go for J2EE and proceed using the components available there.
    if you specify your requirements, then we can discuss the details may be.
    Parag

  • Using files between OsX Beta and IOS : No Keyboard editing?

    My ipad is running IOS Ver 6.1.3(10B329). My Numbers for IOS ver 7.5.2. (752). I have an icloud account, and backing up numbers files to icloud.  I am also using Numbers for OSX Safari (Beta). These versions are current as of Aug 18th 2013.
    My spreadsheet is using text, and numbers in multiple tables and fields. When editing  the file on Safari OSX Numbers Beta, and the opening the same file later in Numbers IOS, once a field box is selected to lets say edit the text, it doesn't allow me to use the Keyboard. ??? Its as if, the ipad isn't allowing any ipad pop-up keyboard edits or entries at all in the document. Anybody having the same?

    Do you have a Bluetooth keyboard attached, or attached but forgotten about?
    Turn off Bluetooth in settings, and retest.
    --Sam

  • Updating 3GS from 3.1.2 to 6.1.3 taking way too long. Is there a better and faster way?

    How long does it take to update an original 3GS to 6.1.3? I followed the iTune instructions and it has been updating for hours already. Is there a better and faster way to do this?

    SO if I want to represent the London Underground
    network as a Graph how would I be able to do it?By writing classes of your own or using some one else's. I don't think that the collections framework has out-of-the-box support for graphs.... So try google first.
    The implementation details depend on the API you are going to use, of course...
    from A to B 5 min
    from B to C 4 min
    from A to C 9 min
    this information is redundant, the third info should be omitted. <nit-picking>
    No it's not - What if there's a special, more direct route from A to C? Also, getting from A to B to C will usually take more time than the time from A to B plus the time from B to C. The trains have to stop at B, don't they?
    </nit-picking>
    Maybe this approach is more complex, but it solves the problem Have I understood correctly - isn't what you describe just another way to implement a graph?

  • BVI - What is it and what are its uses?

    BVI - What is that and what are its uses?

    Ranji,
    A BVI is in fact quite similar to an SVI (interface Vlan). You can define a software bridging between various ports of a router, similar to switching between various ports on a switch. If the ports on a switch belong to the same VLAN and the switch is capable of multilayer switching, you can create an interface Vlan for that VLAN and allow the hosts in that VLAN to use the IP address of the interface Vlan as their default gateway.
    The same goes for interface BVI - Bridged Virtual Interface. When configuring software bridging, you define a group of interfaces that are bridged - the router performs bridging (i.e. software-based switching) of frames between all member ports of a bridge group, in essence forming a single broadcast domain - an IP subnet. If the devices in the common bridge group want to access other IP networks, they need a gateway, so you create an associated interface BVI that is also a part of the bridge group, and devices in the bridge group then use the IP address of the BVI interface as their gateway.
    For exampe, imagine a router with two FastEthernet interfaces:
    bridge irb!interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address no shutdown bridge-group 1!interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address no shutdown bridge-group 1!interface BVI1 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 no shutdown!bridge 1 route ip
    This configuration would make your router to basically behave as a 2-port "switch" on its Fa0/0 and Fa0/1 interfaces, and devices connected to these ports would use the 10.0.0.1 as their default gateway to other networks.
    You rarely configure bridging exactly this way these days, as switches are orders of magnitude faster and have way more ports. Still, there are situations where you need to bridge two interfaces, taking packets out of frames of one technology and putting them into frames of a different technology, without routing them, just repackaging but still carrying them between interfaces. This is often done in, say, DSL if the router is configured to act in bridge mode - take IP packets coming to Ethernet interface and simply repackage them into PPP or ATM+AAL5 cells on the DSL WAN port (and vice versa).
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • Data Recover From Formatted Drive? What is the best program to use to get back Logic Projects and any other file type?

    I was in the process of reorganising my hard drives so I could RAID them however I managed to corrupt one drive and had to format it which meant I lost all my Logic Files and some other files. I managed to save a lot of files (mainly video files) before I had to format the drive but I need a Data Recovery service that will not alter anything on the hard drive and will put all the formatted files (regardless of the type) back for me so I can get the rest of the ones I need.
    Thanks in advance.

    What about folders and such?
    No. FS doesn't reconstruct folders. However, Data Rescue does, depending on how you use it. About the only thing in Data Rescue a Quick Scan ever seems to show you are files that are already live.
    So that leaves you with a Deep Scan, or a Deleted Files scan. The first pass of a Deep Scan will attempt to retrieve folders and files, along with their original names. The second pass only looks for file patterns. Like recognizing a Photoshop .psd file. It will recover it, but give it a nonsense name. A Deleted Files scan only results in nonsense names of recognized file types; no folders.
    What were you using File Salvage on? A hard drive?
    Yes, though you can use it on a flash drive, or any other mounted drive.
    At the moment it is estimating 289 hours remaining on a 1TB drive. Can it not go faster?
    No, both of the software mentioned are slower than molasses in January. When you delete anything in Windows, its file table entry simply tagged as deleted. So to unerase them, the tag is removed. That's why it works to quickly and easily (assuming you haven't already overwritten the data to be recovered).
    In OS X though, the whole idea of the underlying UNIX structure is all about security. It's not supposed to be easy to retrieve deleted items. When you delete items, their file table entries are erased. So the only way to find deleted items is to scour the entire drive for BOF (Beginning Of File) markers that don't have a matching starting block to anything that is in the file table.
    Another question, half the drive was empty. Will it fly over that empty space or will it sieve through it incase there was some files stored on it?
    If you use the Expert mode is FS, you can choose to do that:

  • What is the best format to use on an external hard drive so I can both back up my Macbook Pro and also put movies on it from another hard drive (PC)?

    I am looking for a solution to whether if it is best to get two hard drives or one that can do two things that I want.
    I am looking for a hard drive format that can both back up my 500GB Macbook Pro but I was also wondering if I could also put movies on it from another hard drive that is PC based. Would partitioning the hard drive work for this? I don't know what are the best formats to use.
    If this is too hard it might just be easier having a separate 500GB hard drive for back up of my Mac and another bigger hard drive for the movies etc (the files are probably bigger than 4GB). Any help would be greatly appreciated as I need to make a decision soon!

    Csound1 wrote:
    Microsoft has not released the official exFAT file system specification, and a restrictive license from Microsoft is required in order to make and distribute exFAT implementations. Microsoft also asserts patents on exFAT which make it impossible to re-implement its functionality in a compatible way without violating a large percentage of them.[13] This renders the implementation, distribution, and use of exFAT as a part of free or open-source operating systems or of commercial software, for which the vendors could not obtain a license from Microsoft, not only technically difficult, but legally impossible in countries that recognize United States software patents.
    Can't help with that, if one is using a Windows machine then they are subjected to their rules and control.
    Limited support outside Windows and Mac OS X operating systems as of 2012, when most consumer electronic devices could only handleFAT12/FAT16/FAT32, rendering exFAT (and flash memory formats using it) impractical as a universal exchange format.
    The OP said they plan to store movies on the external drive.
    Many movies today are well over 4GB in size, thus exFAT has to be used and formatted on the PC, which the Mac can then read.
    Older Windows NT versions up to Windows Vista without Service Pack 1 do not support exFAT.
    Irrelevant, Microsoft provides a free download of exFAT for Windows XP, and Vista shouldn't be running on pre SP1 anyway.
    Some distributions of Linux have begun to include support for exFAT. It is however, only available as a file system in user space, as it's not supported by the kernel.
    Irrelevant, OP is using Windows and OS X, not Linux and if they did Linux can read the files at least and transfer, which is all they care about really.
    Windows Vista is unable to use exFAT drives for ReadyBoost. Windows 7 removes this limitation, enabling ReadyBoost caches larger than 4 GiB.[14]
    Irrelevant, the OP's is intending to use it as transfer drive between Mac's and Windows for movies.
    The standard exFAT implementation only uses a single file allocation table and free space map. FAT file systems instead used alternating tables, as this allowed recovery of the file system if the media was ejected during a write (which occurs frequently in practice with removable media). The optional TexFAT component adds support for additional backup tables and maps, but may not be supported.
    Some relevancy, but only exFAT can handle 4GB+ files between Mac's and PC's, so the need outweighs the possible problem.
    The OP needs to follow the standard Windows practice of "safely removing hardware" before physically disconnecting the external drive. If a write is occurring, it won't allow disconnecting until the write is finished.
    Support for up to 2,796,202 files per subdirectory only.[1][nb 3] Microsoft documents a limit of 65,534 files per sub-directory for their FAT32 implementation, but other operating systems have no special limit for the number of files in a FAT32 directory. FAT32 implementations in other operating systems allow an unlimited number of files up to the number of available clusters (that is, up to 268,304,373 files on volumes without long filenames).[nb 4]
    Not a issue, only in extreme cases of a lot of small files. The OP plans to use it for movies which are usually large and take up a lot of space on the drive.
    IMMO It looks like you just ran off and copied something to argue your point when all the points are basically irrelevant.
    There is only one format that can easily share 4GB sized files between Mac's and PC's without further complications.
    It's ALSO possible to install MacDrive on the PC and format the drive on the Mac HFS+, but I didn't recommend that because I know it's a hassle just like third party NTFS writing software is a hassle on Mac's.
    If you so anti-Microsoft format, then you must know Paragon has to pay a license fee to Microsoft for using the NTFS format.
    At least with exFAT there is no fee to Redmond, at least not yet.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error -200587 occurred at DAQmx Start Task.vi:7

    I am running the attached code Merrit_Coil_calibration, and I get the following error: Error -200587 occurred at DAQmx Start Task.vi:7 Possible reason(s): Requested operation could not be performed, because the specified digital lines are either rese

  • How to link to a specific page in an iBook as part of an assignment in an in-session course?

    It would be helpful to link an assignment to a specific page or chapter in an iBook or textbook from iBookstore.  Anyone found a way to do this yet?  I thought is was possible but can't figure it out. Thanks.

  • Use of activity types and cost splitting

    Hi All, We would like to track activities for cost centers, but don't necessarily have the need for a sending cost center/object.  I understand in a traditional manufacturing set-up, you have sending and receiving cost objects that incorporate the us

  • Edit stereoscopic (3d) footage

    I'm trying to edit stereoscopic (3d) footage. I've seen some tutorials of Dave Helmly. I 'm using AVCHD 3D (.MTS) files. I'm expecting to see a Side-by-side image in the program monitor and  hope to see an actual 3D image on my 3D screen. But that do

  • Installing updates on Bridge an PS cc

    I have just subscribed to cc for PS and LR5 only. I am on Mac OS X 10.7.5. LR5 installed without a problem. PSCC installation seemed to stall at 97% and had to shutdown to gain control again. PS opens up and works OK as far as I can see. Bridge did e