What is the best way to organize queue in R/3?

Hi,
I'm in a middle of a project, where I should implement queue in order to sync data between 2 systems - r/3 and legasy one. I have few user exits (or bussiness events), which could be rised concurently in time, and I need only 1 instance of the sync module to run at a time. Well, I know the technique to prevent a program from running in multiple processes, and I have an idea how to organize a queue (my idea is to use transparent table to track actions which should be sync-ed), but there allways are some 'bottlenecks' that should be considered in such an implementation.
That's why it might be of great help if someone could share his/her knowledge on this topic or point me to the right paper/docu, if available.
I just don't want to reinvent the wheel, if possible
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ivaylo Mutafchiev
SAP BC Consultant - ABAP developer
Varna Bussiness Services Ltd.

I'm not sure why you don't just invent a generic data structure (e.g., table name, list of column names and aliases of column names) such as:
class QueryMetaData {
  private final String tableName;
  private final String[] columnNames;
  private final String[] columnAliases;
}Read into the above structure from a properties file, database table, etc. You can store meta-data itself in places other than enum constants, particularly if would like to change the meta-data without requiring a new build of your application.
That having been said, WRT to your specific questions:
(1) Finally, from your experience, what is the best way to organize all that stuff?See above
(2) I have heard that smart Java programmer should avoid using the enums by any means. Do you agree?Enums are better than simple constants using int or String or something similar. If there are known, discrete values unlikely to change frequently, I see no issues with an enum. They improve the readability of code, and there are enough syntactic sugar features in the language (switch statements come to mind) to make them appealing.
(3) Generally what will you prefer when creating a constant which has two values: two final Integers or enum?
See above. Enums were introduced (in large part) to do away with storing constants as integers.
- Saish

Similar Messages

  • What is the best way to organize a tree-like structure of constants?

    Hello everone!
    Need help with organizing my constants structrure.
    I have several tables, and each of them need a list of column names to define the fields returned after query, and also a corresponding list of hashmap keys because that columnnames are ugly. Hashmap is where I store the result of searching through the table. This question is not about JDBC because I search through tables via COM interface, no JDBC ResultSets and other stuff here.
    Finally, for each table I have two constant lists and I have a list of tables. What is the best way to store this?
    My first idea was to create a enum and store column data in it as String array attributes: String[] columnNames; etc.
    But in this case I cannot use each column and key separately.
    Another option is to create two separate enums for each table: columnNames enum and keys enum. That doesn't look great also.
    The third option is to create inner class for each table and store two enums in each of that classes.
    Also I can store all data in hashmaps, Strings etc.
    (1) Finally, from your experience, what is the best way to organize all that stuff?
    (2) I have heard that smart Java programmer should avoid using the enums by any means. Do you agree?
    (3) Generally what will you prefer when creating a constant which has two values: two final Integers or enum?
    Edited by: Dmitry_MSK on Jul 8, 2010 5:22 AM

    I'm not sure why you don't just invent a generic data structure (e.g., table name, list of column names and aliases of column names) such as:
    class QueryMetaData {
      private final String tableName;
      private final String[] columnNames;
      private final String[] columnAliases;
    }Read into the above structure from a properties file, database table, etc. You can store meta-data itself in places other than enum constants, particularly if would like to change the meta-data without requiring a new build of your application.
    That having been said, WRT to your specific questions:
    (1) Finally, from your experience, what is the best way to organize all that stuff?See above
    (2) I have heard that smart Java programmer should avoid using the enums by any means. Do you agree?Enums are better than simple constants using int or String or something similar. If there are known, discrete values unlikely to change frequently, I see no issues with an enum. They improve the readability of code, and there are enough syntactic sugar features in the language (switch statements come to mind) to make them appealing.
    (3) Generally what will you prefer when creating a constant which has two values: two final Integers or enum?
    See above. Enums were introduced (in large part) to do away with storing constants as integers.
    - Saish

  • I need to organize medical photos.  They are pre-op and post-op photos.  What is the best way to organize them.  should I use iphoto or is that too much trouble.

    I need to organize medical photos.  They are pre-op and post-op photos.  What is the best way to organize them?  should I use iphoto or is that too much trouble? Since they occur on different days, organizing by event does not seem appropriate.  Also, organizing by face is not always possible as some are close up photos of an individual eye.  Surely, this has been done before, and I don't want to spin my wheels reinventing this.

    Who can tell with that amount of information to work with?
    iPhoto is not limited to Events or Faces as organizational tools - Albums, Keywords, various forms of metadata can be leveraged for use as well, and these are often more flexible. Really it's up to you to look at the tools available and see if they suit your usage scenario.

  • What is the best way to organize music by artist with various artist...

    What is the best way in iTunes 7 to organize my music by an artist who has several songs that have appearances by other artist? I now have about 400 Artist, in my artist list.
    1-Most of them are by the same Artist but with people who appear on their album as a special guest. What is the best solution for this?
    2-The same Artist appear on someone else's album what is the best solutions for this? I would like to have as few categories as possible.
    When I have a track with 2 artist, how will iTunes handle both Artist or do I have to determine? If I choose 1 Artist, does this mean that when I search for the 2nd Artist that the track would not be found. Please help me. I want to fix my Library so I can back it up.

    Do you mean the Artist and the Album
    Artist fields?
    There is the Artist field. This is for the
    artist(s) doing the song.
    There is the Album Artist field. This is for
    who's album it is.
    If there are featured artists on a song, I usually
    take them out of the Artist field and put it
    after the song title.
    "Smooth" - Santana featuring Rob Thomas becomes
    "Smooth featuring Rob Thomas" - Santana.
    This way I don't end up with a bunch of different
    artists showing up in the Artists column.
    That wwas exactly what I was talking about.

  • What is the best way to organize LabVIEW VIs to be used with TestStand?

    I'm using LabVIEW 8.6 with TestStand 4.1.1 and I'm trying to organize the VIs to later deploy them to a production PC. So, I organized them into a LV project and built a LLB with the "Source Distribution Tool". (Destination type: LLB)
    Some VIs in the LLB use the "Call Library Function" (user32.dll) to simulate keyboard events. But, when any of these VIs is called from TS, LabVIEW is suddenly terminated. When these same VIs are not in the LLB and are called from TS they do not have any problem.
    Is the LLB the best way to organize VIs to be used with TestStand? If so, What could I be doing wrong?
    I appreciate your help.
    H.P.
    Mfg. Test Engineer
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer
    Attachments:
    LabVIEW Problem.JPG ‏28 KB

    Hi Ray,
    I really appreciate your intention to help, but I believe I solved the problem already. However I still have some questions.
    The problem was that when I built the LLB the configuration of the "Call Library Function" changed. When the LLB is built it is also created a Support Directory named "data" that contains some dependencies including a new copy of the user32.dll. The "Library name or path" field in the "Call Library Function" changed to be linked to a new Dependency Path. ( ...\data\user32.dll.)
    What I did was select "Specify path on diagram" and create a path-constant ("C:\WINDOWS\system32\user32.dll"), so the "Call Library Function" will be always linked to the original user32.dll.
    I still don't know why the "Call Library Function doesn't work with the user32.dll copy in the New Dependency Path. And I'm not sure if the LLB is the best way to organize VIs to be used with TestStand.
    Do you know why?
    Thank you,
    H.P.
    Mfg. Test Engineer
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer

  • What is the best way to organize pictures for huge library?

    Hello.
    I have lost 3 evenings of work the last week after the corruption of the iPhoto database. I lose my temper now . it was not the first time. but I’m ready to take long term action to improve the situation.
    I have now around 15.000 pics & something like 15 Go of data. That means I have to use an external drive to store them all. Each team the connection between the external HD & my iBook is lost, not often but can happen, the database is bugged. Of course I gonna have more and more pictures in the future, I took 5.000 Go of pictures back from Australia.
    My question is very general, what is the best way to handle this kind of database size?
    Okay, now I know that I should bake-up the Library6.iPhoto file. What else?
    Could I archive my rolls on CDs (well I should do it anyway) & delete the rolls from the database afterwards? What about the photo album? Is it possible to restore the pictures from the CDs to the hard drive?
    I have read that I should create several libraries. That could be a solution. Is it possible to split the current one? I could import the pictures in a new library, but in this case I will lose the comments field.
    I would really appreciate if you could send me your feedback about handling this size of library. Thanks in advance.

    Arnaud:
    There's is a way you can have your library on your boot drive and keep the "source" files on the external. It's using iPhoto in it's alias mode. There are pluses and minuses to this system. The pluses are that you can have a very large library. I have 18,000+ photos in my alias library. The iPhoto Library folder on my boot drive is only 1.7MB while the source files on my external HD take up 27G.
    The minuses are 1: if the external HD is not mounted then you can only view the thumbnail files and any full sized files that have been edited (the edited version is saved to the iPhoto Library folder). Any operation that requires moving a thumbnail or using the full sized version can't be run. 2: if you delete a photo from your library the "source" file does not get deleted. You'll have to do that via the Finder. 3: When you add new files it's best if you put them in their own folder with the other source folders and then import. If you try to put them in another folder it you'll have to import them manually instead of just dragging the entire new folder into iPhoto to create a new roll.
    I've created some Tutorials to help users convert and use this type of library. It's not for everyone but may hold some pluses for your situation.
    Do you Twango?
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've written an Automator workflow application, iPhoto dB file backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
    G5 Dual Core 2GHz, 2G RAM, 250G HD; G4 Dual 1Ghz, 1.5G RAM, 80G HD,   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   QT 7.1.3, 22 LCD, 200 & 160G FW HDs, Canon S400, i850 & LIDE 50, Epson R200

  • What's the best way to organize apps?

    Our college library will purchase iPads for students to check out (200 apps per device). We want each subject to have its own "homepage" or folder. Can we create multiple user accounts for each device (e.g, 1 Psyc, 1 Eng...)? What is the best way to handle this?  Students can check out the device for a week, so they will not be familiar with which apps we  have and where they are. We are looking for a soution so that a nursing student can pick up the device and be able to intuitively find all of the nursing/medical apps.  Thanks for your help.

    The iPad does not have a multi-user OS.
    You can manually organise apps into seperate homescreens and folders either on the iPad itself, or in iTunes.
    However, there is no way to prevent the students from moving the apps around themselves, deleting them, or plugging the iPad into their own computer and wiping the whole thing.

  • What is the best way to organize photos? iPhoto or Aperture?

    I am a mom taking tons of photos of my young children. On my old PC I used to organize everything within "My Pictures" by Month & Year (May 2008). I am a very organized, linear person and don't like to change the way I do things midstream so I am having a hard time figuring out how to organize our family photos now that I have switched to a Mac with iPhoto and Aperture. In the future I hope to learn about Aperture's professional tools (which as a mom & not a professional photographer I currently do not use). I would love to take photography classes at a local community college someday...
    My questions are as follows:
    1) What is the better way for ME to store our photos? Should I be uploading to iPhoto or Aperture? I basically want all of my "master photo images" in the same location in an organized fashion. I am hoping to do this without clogging up my computer. At this point I am thinking at the end of each year I will burn the year's photos to a disk for save keeping. But until then...
    2) Is the "library" the over-arching place where all photos are stored? In general, I am having a hard time following the hierarchy of where my photos are being stored, how to organize them and how to completely delete bad photos.
    3) Can I do everything I can do in iPhoto in Aperture? Obviously I know I can do more but is it as easy to edit/fix up photos?
    I have listened to/watched several tutorials on both programs and have read through many other folks' questions/answers but I am still not sure of what to do.
    I really appreciate any help/advice anyone is willing to give!
    Thanks!

    I'm not a professional either, just a grandma with a love of digital photography who takes lots of photos. We used to live in a motorhome full time, so we had lots of opportunities to take many photos.
    I personally like Aperture better than iPhoto because I like to use some of the NIK software/plugins where I can do the adjusting right in Aperture and don't always have to send the photos to PhotoShop. Also you have a bit more flexibility as to file set ups with Aperture. In iPhoto you don't have as many nesting capabilities. iPhoto is great, but pretty basic.
    I had my photos set up as files on the PC, long before I got my first Mac. So I set them up the same way. I'll try to explain
    In Finder:
    Pictures (in side bar on left in Finder)
    Folder - My Photos
    2nd Folder - by year
    In the year folder I have a folder by date ie: 20000722 (year,month,date) and the photos from that date in there.
    Once I got to using Aperture, I have my years set up as "projects" and the dates set up as "Albums". When importing the whole set of photos into Aperture, it was easy. I highlighted the "library", then did a right mouse click and selected "import folders as projects". That imported the photos into Aperture the same way I have them in finder.
    Once everything is in Aperture, and you have new photos to add, I make an album under the corresponding year and import.
    I do all my photos as referenced and don't duplicate them again, as I have them backed up in a couple of other places.
    IMHO you can't back up enough! Don't wait and do it only once a year! Hard drives have a way of crashing and you'll loose all your photos. Use DVD's, thumb drives, ext. hard drives or what ever works for you. But always back up.
    When I take my photos off of the memory card, I immediately send a copy to the back up external HD. Once the photos are adjusted etc. I make sure I have a copy elsewhere too. Only then do I erase them off of the memory card. Might be a bit redundant, but I'm not about to loose any of my photos. When we lived in the motorhome we were always aware of the possibility of theft or fire. So I got in the habit of taking some time to reduce the size of the photos and keep them on a thumb drive that I kept out of the RV. If anyone broke in or we had a fire, I'd still have the photos. Maybe not the originals or the bigger size, but we wouldn't loose them either.
    If you want more info on non professional filing, send me a PM and I can send you a photo of my file hierarchy . (suemach (at) mac (dot) com)
    Allie

  • WHAT'S THE BEST WAY TO ORGANIZE MY MUSIC IN MY IPHONE?

    HELLO. I'D LIKE TO HEAR (OR READ...JEJEJE) MORE OPINIONS ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION OF MY MUSIC IN MY IPHONE. I'VE ALREADY CREATED SOME PLAYLISTS BY GENERE, BUT FOR ME, SOUNDS BETTER CREATE A UNIVERSE OF MUSIC AS ONE PLAY LIST AND THEN (IN MY IPHONE) CREATE MANY PLAYLISTS DENOMINATED ON-THE-GO (THOSE ONES BY GENERE), SYNC THE IPHONE AND CHANGE THE NAME OF THE PLAYLIST IN ITUNES.
    IS THIS THE BEST WAY?
    THANK YOU FOR YOUR OPINIONS AND HAVE A NICE DAY

    further explanation: I was totally accustomed to organizing and using my photos and videos on an external drive when I was a Windows user.  Switched to Mac about 5 yrs ago, love it, and have adjusted to the differences, EXCEPT when it comes to the photos and vids.  I Understand where Ben is coming from, because I prefer keeping my photos on an external drive, filed by year, then month, then occasion.  iPhoto keeps getting itself involved, and in my way, and I'm just wondering if it would be better to surrender my way and learn iPhoto's.  I will check out the discussions on the iPhoto forum too.
    I edit photos in photoshop elements, and have ordered lightroom 4 to learn.  I don't have any need for iPhoto, as far as I can see!

  • What is the best way to process / queue?

    Hello,
    I have a requirement:
    1) Users create as many workflows as they like at any time.
    2) During the execution each workflow changes it's status from e.g. 'Pending' to 'Active'.
    3) Only one workflow can be in 'Active' status at any given time.
    4) Processing of workflows occurs in FIFO mode.
    We don't like the idea of having a trigger to watch out for the status of a workflow.
    Can someone please suggest some more nice solution to making all workflows but one wait untill the 'slot' becomes available and then the workflow which is the next one in line becomes 'Active'. The queue comes in mind but I am not sure this will be the best approach.
    Thank you.
    Anatoliy Smirnov

    I can't say whether JMS is "the answer" to your question, but if you're rewriting your application in Java, and need to send messages from one program to another with the ability to queue up messages somewhere if the receiving program is not ready to accept them yet, then using JMS sounds a reasonable approach. Note that both the sender and receiver of the message must use the JMS API (though some providers support other languages).
    The JMS tutorial at [http://java.sun.com/products/jms/tutorial/1_3_1-fcs/doc/jms_tutorialTOC.html|http://java.sun.com/products/jms/tutorial/1_3_1-fcs/doc/jms_tutorialTOC.html] explains some of the key concepts.
    Nigel

  • What's the best way to organize a sequence of objects of different classes

    Say I have a base class and some derived classes... lots of different derived classes, actually. I need to create many objects from all sorts of these subclasses and put them onto a LIFO sequence. What's the ideal type of collection to handle this? I'd also like to shuffle and pop elements, as well. I know about Vectors and Stacks, but I am wondering... Is it possible to have different types of these objects floating around in them? Would I have to use generics?
    I know you can create a list of the superclass and simply cast it to that, but I read that was bad practice.

    mhoribe wrote:
    I see.
    Let me ask you this. What, exactly, goes on when casting? If I add new methods and field to a subclass and cast it back to the base class, will I get any trouble using methods and fields? Or does Java simply allow this for simplicity sake. Like, we know it's a base class, but I'll allow you to call it a superclass just so it will be compatible and simple. Kinda get what I'm going for here?You never need to cast something to a super. Every instance of a subclass IS and instance of all its superclasses and interfaces.
    However, if you're adding new methods and fields to a subclass, there's a good chance you're subclassing for the wrong reasons, and especially if you're storing objects of these various classes in the same data structure but not treating them as a common parent type, you probably have a broken design.

  • What's the best way to organize media in iTunes?

    I have a new Mac Mini running my iTunes.  I have over 80GB of songs and I have them stored on an outboard 1TB drive (a laCie rugged).
    Since I installed my new Mac Mini, iTunes has automatically moved my media, so that I seem now to have folders with different media in them.  I frequently get the ! sign, sending me to find the song I'm trying to play.  I do this using Spotlight, and when I track down the song, I allow iTunes to use that location for my music.  Except it's not the only location, and I have to do this again and again.
    Can anyone suggest the default (or even a folder I choose myself) where all my media can be stored, and in what form?  Should the sub-folders be named for the artist, or the album, or should I just use the song titles?
    Needless to say, my Playlists (I had hundreds) didn't move over with the swap, so I am laboriously trying to rebuild them one by one... if I can find the songs in question, that is.
    Any guidance would be warmly received!
    Thanks,
    Sean Dell

    THank you.  I tried that.  It is now laboriously duplicating every song into a new iTunes folder within iTunes.  And within that new folder, it has a sub-folder, iTunes Media, and within that, a folder called Music. Three new layers of subfolders, and 80+ gigs of space that it doesn't need.  Instead of simply looking in the location I specified in my Preferences - Advanced.
    Frustrating. 
    If all this took thirty seconds, I wouldn't mind.  But it's been churning for an hour now, and only looks to be half done.

  • What's the best way to organize my photos

    I have iPhoto, regular finder files, and adobe Bridge.  I loose photos all the time because of the automated functions in iPhoto, and am wondering if I ought to bite the bullet and give up organizing my personal picture files on my external hard drive, or perhaps learn how to use both in a way that will actually help me find pictures I need, when I need them?

    further explanation: I was totally accustomed to organizing and using my photos and videos on an external drive when I was a Windows user.  Switched to Mac about 5 yrs ago, love it, and have adjusted to the differences, EXCEPT when it comes to the photos and vids.  I Understand where Ben is coming from, because I prefer keeping my photos on an external drive, filed by year, then month, then occasion.  iPhoto keeps getting itself involved, and in my way, and I'm just wondering if it would be better to surrender my way and learn iPhoto's.  I will check out the discussions on the iPhoto forum too.
    I edit photos in photoshop elements, and have ordered lightroom 4 to learn.  I don't have any need for iPhoto, as far as I can see!

  • What is the best way to keep my personal files stored in iCloud separate from my work-related files?

    What is the best way to keep my personal files stored in iCloud separate from my work-related files? It seems that I'm not allowed to link my iPad mini and my work iMac using two different accounts, so I'm wondering how to make my single personal account work for both, while keeping personal vs work files reasonably separated.
    Thanks for any suggestions.

    Is it possible for you to upgrade your account to iCloud Drive? That would mean, all Macs upgraded to Yosemite, and all mobile devices to iOS8?
    See:  iCloud Drive FAQ and iCloud: About using iWork for iOS and iCloud
    In iCloud Drive you could create two separate custom folders, one for work documents and one for private documents and organize your documents there.  Don't use the app specific folders (Keynote, Pages, Numbers, ...) , because you can only create one level of folders inside these folders.

  • What's the best way to import ALL of my photos (34k +) and then share?

    *Part I - importing:*
    I've got approximately 34,400 photos on a networked drive that I need to be able to control using iPhoto. I want these files to stay on the network drive, but also be controlled by iPhoto (organized by date). Right now our photos folder on the network drive is a bit of a mess, some folders are named by date only and some are named by the event itself ("birthday 2009", etc.). I want this naming to go away in place of the iPhoto method (by date only). FYI, I am familiar with how to get to the "original" and "modified" folders/files within the iPhoto Library.
    Question: Is there a way to get iPhoto to organize the photos (all by date) an leave the original photos on the networked drive? or do I need to:
    > Import ALL photos into my iPhoto with the "import photos into iPhoto Library" option checked (iPhoto copies all original files to my laptop hard drive)
    > Then manually move the file structure (all new folders created - by date) back to my networked drive
    > THEN...remove all photos from the iPhoto Library and re-import the newly organized photos from the network drive but unchecking the "import photos into iPhoto Library" option.
    Right now, both of our MacBook Pro's use iPhoto to access those photos independently of one another (each laptop does their own thing). This also creates problems because when files are imported on my laptop they are saved locally (on my laptop) and not on the network drive, same goes for my wife's laptop. Then she's not able to see those new photos.
    *Part II - sharing:*
    I'm also in the process of trying to figure out the best way to share all of our photos between our different laptops. Using the "sharing" function in iPhoto isn't ideal since that requires both laptops to be on.
    My understanding of sharing the iPhoto library itself (having it saved on the networked drive) between two laptops is that only one laptop can access this library at a time, or there's potential of having the files become corrupt (two laptops trying to access the file at the same time).
    Question: What's the best way to share photos between two laptops?
    Thanks in advance

    RONBO
    Is there a way to get iPhoto to organize the photos (all by date) an leave the original photos on the networked drive?
    Yes there is. But I don't recommend it as a way of working with iPhoto.
    Simply go to iPhoto Menu -> Preferences -> Advanced and uncheck 'Copy Files to the iPhoto Library on Import'.
    Now iPhoto will not copy the files, but rather simply reference them on your HD. To do this it will create an alias in the Originals Folder that points to your file. It will still create a thumbnail and, if you modify the pics, a Modified version within the iPhoto Library Folder.
    However, you need to be aware of a number of potential pitfalls using this system.
    1. Import and deleting pics are more complex procedures
    2. You cannot move or rename the files on your system or iPhoto will lose track of them on systems prior to 10.5 and iPhoto 08. Even with the later versions issues can still arise if you move the referenced files to new volumes or between volumes.
    3. Most importantly, migrating to a new disk or computer can be much more complex.
    The problems arise when you change the path to the Files. iPhoto has no way of reconnecting that path and you could find yourself resolving aliases one at a time for all 34k Photos.
    Other apps, such as Aperture have a command to re-connect with the master files.
    FYI, I am familiar with how to get to the "original" and "modified" folders/files within the iPhoto Library.
    Good for you but never, ever access the files this way. Period. Within the iPhoto Package File there are no user sercviceable parts.
    All your work gets done in the iPhoto Window. Everything you need to do can be done from there - and must be.
    Then manually move the file structure (all new folders created - by date) back to my networked drive
    Never, ever break up the internals of the iPhoto Package File. You'll break iPhoto if you do.
    Also, what format is that Networked Drive? iPhoto needs to have the Library sitting on disk formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled). Users with the Library sitting on disks otherwise formatted regularly report issues including, but not limited to, importing, saving edits and sharing the photos.
    Question: What's the best way to share photos between two laptops?
    If simultaneous sharing is your goal then you need to use a Media Server app. iPhoto isn't one.
    The key really is the format of the NAS. IF you can make it Mac OS Extended (Journaled) then you can easily store your Library on it and share it. Otherwise you need to use another application for the job.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for

  • Restoring HD from Time Machine - sleep causes freeze

    Hi Im just trying to migrate my system from a 250GB HD to a new (formatted) 1TB HD. I boot from the Snow Leopard DVD, select 'restore from backup', select the drive and it starts with an estimated 4 hours till completion. However after a few minutes

  • Indesign CS3 text frame parameters and export PDF

    could use some help with the following: I need to edit and export a large number (7000) Indesign documents (one page) 1. check for locked text frames and unlock 2. group all text frames 3. set grouped text frames at x=8 millimeters, y 10 milimeters 4

  • Quick selection tool only wants to make angular selections

    I'm using PS CC on a Mac, OS 10.9.4 . My quick selection tool suddenly decided to be heavily biased towards making angular selections. It REALLY does not want to follow curves.  I have restarted the computer and checked that the brush size and other

  • My silver 80 gb ipod classic is part

    Hi everyone. When I got this ipod in 2011 it was shown as part # 661 4514 on the apple store invoice and says MODEL A1238 on the back. It is silver with a silver back and 80 GB and when I put the serial number in to look up the manual the 160 GB manu

  • Search Result doesn't show the task attachement :- Room Content Search

    Hi Experts,   I am facing a problem with the Room content search. I was able to create a task(In a Room)and was able to attach a document as a supporting document for that task. The Problem am facing is like When I do a Room content search, the attac