What is the most efficient way to record a educational workshop training on my iPad and then upload it to either Schoology or a Teacher Tube channel? We would need to record clips anywhere from 10 min to 45 minutes and organize them in such a way?

Any help will be appreciated. We have a training comming up next week and seeking to find out if there are any new technologies that I could utilize and model for this workshop.
Thank you.

What many people do is use one of the solutions that allow you to mirror from an iOS device to a computer:
Reflector- http://www.airsquirrels.com/reflector/
AirServer- http://www.airserverapp.com
X-Mirage: http://www.x-mirage.com/x-mirage/
and then use screen capture software on the computer to capture the iPad's display. The other option is to use a document camera or video camera to record the iPad. Questions about uploading to the references sites would be issue best addressed with those sites or in their forums.
Regards.

Similar Messages

What's the most efficient way to serve a file from a servlet?

I have a servlet that does various different things depending on the needs. Sometimes it dynamically generates content, and sometimes all it does is send a file out, with no alteration.
What is the most efficient way to just send a file?
One option:
OutputStream os = response.getOutputStream();
InputStream is = new FileInputStream(...)
(send all the bytes from is to os, the regular way using a buffer)Another option is to say:
RequestDispatcher rd = response.getRequestDispatcher(fileName);
rd.forward();Any other options? What's the prefered way of doing this?
I know the rule of "don't optimize too early" but this is a situation where we need to get the maximum amount of files served with the hardware we have, and it's going to be a lot of static files, so efficiency is important.
Thanks

Ok, that's what I thought. It would be nice if there were a "response.sendStream(InputStream input)" method in the ServletResponse class. Even nicer would be a sendFile or sendChannel or something. This is probably a common usage and it's a place where the container has many opportunities for optimization. For example, it could call the operating systems send_file kernel call so the entire transfer would be done directly from the disk controller to the ether card (on systems that support that).
For now I'll just do my own buffered copy.

I am giving my old MacBook Air to my granddaughter. What is the most efficient way to erase all the data on it?

I am giving my old MacBook Air to my granddaughter. What is the most efficient way to erase the data?

You have two options.....
One is to do a clean reinstall of your OS - if you still have the USB installer that came with your Macbook Air...
The second option is to create a new user (your granddaugher's name).....Deauthorize your Macbook Air from your Itunes and Appstore.....
Restart your Macbook after you've created your granddaughter's user name, login under your granddaughter's username and delete your username.
Search your Macbook for your old files and delete them.....
Good luck...

What is the most efficient way to have full access to the front panel on RT Labview?

I have a RT machine that needs to do its job and also port the front panel to an external machine over the network. What is the most efficient way to do it? Using as little of the RT time as possible but providing full functionality to the RT front panel.
So far I have been using it directly from Labview - running the VI on a remote (RT) and have the front panel on local Labview (WINDOWS). I know I can do it with also through WWW (not very happy with that though).
LV2009 SP1.
Thanks

Running a compiled executable on the RT target, rather than running it within the development environment, is probably slightly more efficient but limits you to the web interface. If you're running within the LabVIEW environment, I doubt there's a noticeable difference in efficiency from the RT perspective between the web server and the LabVIEW front panel, although that's mostly a guess (I would expect the RT system to send identical data in each case, once the front panel is loaded). Those are your only options in modern LabVIEW versions. In LabVIEW 7.1 you could build an executable that acted as the front panel for an RT system, but that feature does not exist in recent versions. However, a quick search turned up this document with code to approximately duplicate that behavior, perhaps it will work for you?

What is the most efficient way to convert a static site to a responsive site using Dreamweaver?

I need to convert an old site made in Dreamweaver to be responsive to any monitor size. What is the most efficient way to do this?

Depending on what you have to work with and how it was coded, it might be doable and then again not. Suffice it to say, there are no magic buttons that will do this for you. Also consider that mobile & tablet users interact differently with their web devices. So your navigation & forms must be finger friendly. Also images & content must make mobile users happy without killing their dataplans. There's a lot of planning that goes into making a good Responsive Web site.
Nancy O.

What is the most efficient way to turn an array of 16 bit unsigned integers into an ASCII string such that...?

What is the most efficient way to turn a one dimensional array of 16 bit unsigned integers into an ASCII string such that the low byte of the integer is first, then the high byte, then two bytes of hex "00" (that is to say, two null characters in a row)?
My method seems somewhat ad hoc. I take the number, split it, then interleave it with 2 arrays of 4095 bytes. Easy enough, but it depends on all of these files being exactly 16380 bytes, which theoretically they should be.
The size of the array is known. However, if it were not, what would be the best method?
(And yes, I am trying to read in a file format from another program)

My method:
Attachments:
word_array_to_weird_string.vi ‏18 KB

What is the most efficient way to post several stories to multiple html pages

What is the most efficient way to post five stories to multiple html pages?
Currently they are all html files saved in DW with some divs sharing content and other divs are unique.
I've experimented with saving stories as library items and dropping into other html but wondered if there is a more efficient or dynamic process.

Server-Side Includes.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/2112460#2112460
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Moving content from iMovie to iMovie - what's the most efficient way?

If I edit and create movies in iMovie08 on one iMac and I want to transfer the content to iMovie08 another iMac 200 miles away , what's the most efficient way? I prefer not to burn DVDs, because I want to do further work on the movies on the second iMac's iMovie (so I can share them with iTunes and sync them with Apple TV).

>PDPageAddCosContents(destPage, PDPageGetCosContents(srcPage));
Does this method (PDPageGetCosContent) exist? It would be easy enough
to create, but I don't see it in the document.
More seriously, I have a vague memory that it is a Really Bad Thing to
share the same Contents objects between multiple pages. Maybe
something to do with page deletion, can't remember.
>PDPageAddCosResource(destPage, PDPageGetCosResources(srcPage));
These two methods are not symmetric, and PDPageAddCosResource doesn't
work that way, sadly...
Aandi Inston

With OS 10.4.11, what is the most efficient back up system?

Using OS 10.4.11 on a PowerPc G5, what is the most efficient way to backup?

Look at Mac Backup - Mac Backup Software, Hardware, and Guides for Your Mac http://macs.about.com/od/usingyourmac/tp/backuphub.htm and Mac OS X data backup FAQ http://www.macmaps.com/backup.html and Important Mac Backup Tips- Time Machine, CCC, SuperDuper http://mikosweb.com/it-advice-blog/70-mac-backup-tips Here's a list/description of Mac backup software http://www.pure-mac.com/backup.html
The majority of Mac users use CarbonCopy Cloner @ http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html , or SuperDuper @ http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html . You can also use or the Restore function of Disk Utility included in OS X.
When you backup, boot into Safe Mode (depress the Shift key at startup) and the backup will be safer and faster.
 Cheers, Tom

What is the most efficient (in terms of cost) way to transfer 35 mm slides to my iMac hard drive?

What is the most cost efficient way to transfer 35mm slide images to my iMac hard drive?

This gives you the basics
http://www.tech-faq.com/how-to-copy-slides-to-disk.htm
The first option, the professional one, isn't the cheapest - but the results should be good.
The second option is very appealing. Some printers come with brackets that can be used to scan film or slides.
The third option is a slide scanner. I haven't used this option, but there's a significant startup cost of under $100.
In short, a scanner is the cheapest and most efficient option.

PowerShell - what is the most efficient/fastest way to find an object in an arraylist

Hi
I Work with a lot of array lists in PowerShell when working as a sharepoint administrator. I first used arrays but found them slow and jumped over to array lists.
Often i want to find a specific object in the array list, but the respons-time varies a lot. Does anyone have code for doing this the most efficient way?
Hope for some answers:-)
brgs
Bjorn

Often i want to find a specific object in the array list, but the respons-time varies a lot. Does anyone have code for doing this the most efficient way?
As you decided to use an ArrayList, you must keep your collection sorted, and then use the method BinarySearch() to find the objects your looking for.
Consider using a dictionary, and if your objects are string type, then a StringDictionary.
You stil fail to understand that he slowness is no in the arraylist. It is in the creating of the arraylist which is completely unnecessary. Set up a SharePoint servefr and create a very large list and test.. You will see. An arraylist
with 10000 items takes forever to create. A simple SharePoint search can be done in a few milliseconds.
Once created the lookup in any collection is dependent on the structure of the key and the type of collection. A string key can be slow if it is a long key.
The same rules apply to general database searches against an index.
The main point here is that SharePoint IS a database and searching it as a database is the fastesst method.
Prove me wrong devil! Submit! Back to your cage! Fie on thee!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You seem to be making a lot of assumptions about what he's doing with those arraylists that doesn't seem justified based on no more information than there is in the posted question.
[string](0..33|%{[char][int](46+("686552495351636652556262185355647068516270555358646562655775 0645570").substring(($_*2),2))})-replace " "

What is the most efficient way to compare two Lists?

List A{itemId,itemName} [1,xyz] [9,iyk] [4,iuo] .......
List B{itemId,item price} [2,999] [9,888] [1, 444].......
Assume A will be a much larger list than B
I am trying to find all the items with same itemiId. what would be the most efficient way to do that?
Thanks!

Tinkerbell. wrote:
BigDaddyLoveHandles wrote:
You wrote:
Can we assume that an itemId only occurs once in each list? You're the one making claims and assumptions, not me.No in #4 I asked the OP to verify an assumption.An assumption that couldn't possibly be true. Why are you wasting our time?

What's the most efficient way to transfer to personal domain?

I've been using the cumbersome .Mac address and have spent a lot of time optimizing the site, having also purchased a domain name (which I'll switch to), which is currently masked and forwarded. So what's the most smooth way of using the personal domain without losing all the strides I've made to get bumped up in the rankings? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. www.RedCottageInc.com (that's my future personal domain!)

I'm saying that you give Google the .Mac URL to get to your sitemap but use the registered domain name for normal access.
You are promoting your site with www.RedCottageInc.com but, because it is masked, Google needs your web.mac address to access the verification file and the sitemap so that it can spider your site.
You normally upload your sitemap as "sitemap.xml". You can test its accessibility by entering
http://web.mac.com/username/WebSiteName/Sitemap.xml in your browser.
Google needs this URL to get to the sitemap - visitors will use www.RedCottageInc.com.
Google wants to get to the verification file and the sitemap but your website visitors don't.
I guess all this is confusing if you haven't done it before and I don't know that I am explaining it very well. The best way to get it is to go through all the steps of creating the verification file and sitemap, uploading them to your site folder and adding and verifying in your Google control panel.
Here are the relevant Google pages...
Guidelines...
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
Add URL to Google...
http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl
Verification file....
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35658&query=html+f ile&topic=&type=
Sitemap...
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34657&ctx=sibling

What is the most efficient way of passing large amounts of data through several subVIs?

I am acquiring data at a rate of once every 30mS. This data is sorted into clusters with relevant information being grouped together. These clusters are then added to a queue. I have a cluster of queue references to keep track of all the queues. I pass this cluster around to the various sub VIs where I dequeue the data. Is this the most efficient way of moving the data around? I could also use "Obtain Queue" and the queue name to create the reference whenever I need it.
Or would it be more efficient to create one large cluster which I pass around? Then I can use unbundle by index to pick off the values I need. This large cluster can have all the values individually or it co
uld be composed of the previously mentioned clusters (ie. a large cluster of clusters).

> I am acquiring data at a rate of once every 30mS. This data is sorted
> into clusters with relevant information being grouped together. These
> clusters are then added to a queue. I have a cluster of queue
> references to keep track of all the queues. I pass this cluster
> around to the various sub VIs where I dequeue the data. Is this the
> most efficient way of moving the data around? I could also use
> "Obtain Queue" and the queue name to create the reference whenever I
> need it.
> Or would it be more efficient to create one large cluster which I pass
> around? Then I can use unbundle by index to pick off the values I
> need. This large cluster can have all the values individually or it
> could be composed of the previously mentioned clusters (i
e. a large
> cluster of clusters).
It sounds pretty good the way you have it. In general, you want to sort
these into groups that make sense to you. Then if there is a
performance problem, you can arrange them so that it is a bit better for
the computer, but lets face it, our performance counts too. Anyway,
this generally means a smallish number of groups with a reasonable
number of references or objects in them. If you need to group them into
one to pass somewhere, bundle the clusters together and unbundle them on
the other side to minimize the connectors needed. Since the references
are four bytes, you don't need to worry about the performance of moving
these around anyway.
Greg McKaskle

SQL query with multiple tables - what is the most efficient way?

Hello I am learning PL/SQL. I have a simple procedure where I need to find number of employees and departments per location as per user input of location_id.
I have 3 Tables:
LOCATIONS
location_id (pk)
location_name
DEPARTMENTS
department_id (pk)
location_id (fk)
department_name
EMPLOYEES
employee_id (pk)
department_id (fk)
employee_name
1 Location can have 0-MANY Departments
1 Employee has 1 Department
Here is the query I came up with for PL/SQL procedure:
/*Ecount, Dcount are NUMBER variables */
SELECT SUM (EmployeeCount), COUNT(DepartmentNumber)
     INTO Ecount, Dcount
     FROM
     (SELECT COUNT(employee_id) EmployeeCount, department_id DepartmentNumber
          FROM employees
          GROUP BY department_id
          HAVING department_id IN
                    (SELECT department_id
                    FROM departments
                    WHERE location_id = userInput));
I do get the correct result, but I am just wondering if my query is on the right track and if there is a more "efficient" way of doing this.
Thanks in advance for helping a newbie out.

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
Something like this will be more efficient:
SELECT    COUNT (employee_id)               AS ECount
,       COUNT (DISTINCT department_id)     AS DCount
FROM       employees
WHERE       department_id IN (     SELECT     department_id
                    FROM      departments
                    WHERE      location_id = :userInput
;You should also try a join instead of the IN subquery.
For efficiency, do only the things you need to do.
For example, you don't need a count of employees in each department, so don't compute one. That means you won't need the in-line view, so don't have one.
You don't need PL/SQL for this job, so don't use PL/SQL if you don't have to. (I realize this question was out of context, so you may have good reasons for doing this in PL/SQL.)
Do all filtering as early as possible. Don't waste effort computing things that won't be used .
A particular example of this is: Never use a HAVING clause when you can use a WHERE clause. What's the difference between a WHERE clause and a HAVING clause? The WHERE clause is applied before aggregate functions are computed, and the HAVING clause is applied after; there's no other difference. Therefore, if the HAVING clause isn't referencing an aggregate function, it could be done in a WHERE clause instead.

What is the most efficient way to record a educational workshop training on my iPad and then upload it to either Schoology or a Teacher Tube channel? We would need to record clips anywhere from 10 min to 45 minutes and organize them in such a way?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for